Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 are metastatic and prognostic biomarker for non-small cell lung cancer

  • Lei Zhou1,
  • Lan Yu1,
  • Bo Zhu1,
  • Shiwu Wu1Email author,
  • Wenqing Song1,
  • Xiaomeng Gong1 and
  • Danna Wang1
Contributed equally
BMC Cancer201616:876

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2903-z

Received: 11 July 2015

Accepted: 27 October 2016

Published: 10 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Tumor recurrence and metastasis are the most common reason for treatment failure. Metastasis-associate in colon cancer-1 (MACC1) has been identified as a metastatic and prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer and other solid tumors. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1), a marker of cancer stem cells, is also associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in many tumors. However, the prognostic value of either MACC1 or ALDH1 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. In this study, we explored the relationship between MACC1 and ALDH1 expression, as well as their respective associations with clinicopathological features, to determine if either could be useful for improvement of survival prognosis in NSCLC.

Methods

The expression levels of both MACC1 and ALDH1 in 240 whole tissue sections of NSCLC were examined by immunohistochemistry. Clinical data were also collected.

Results

MACC1 and ALDH1 were significantly overexpressed in NSCLC tissues when compared to levels in normal lung tissues. Investigation of associations between MACC1 or ALDH1 protein levels with clinicopathological parameters of NSCLC revealed correlations between the expression of each with tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, and tumor node metastasis. The overall survival of patients with MACC1- or ALDH1-positive NSCLC tumors was significantly lower than that of those who were negative. Importantly, multivariate analysis suggested that positive expression of either MACC1 or ALDH1, as well as TNM stage, could be independent prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with NSCLC.

Conclusions

MACC1 and ALDH1 may represent promising metastatic and prognostic biomarkers, as well as potential therapeutic targets, for NSCLC.

Keywords

NSCLC MACC1 ALDH1 CSCs Prognosis

Background

New lung cancer cases were estimated at 1.8 million and accounted for nearly 13 % of all new cancer cases in 2012, making it the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide [1]. It was also the most frequent cause of cancer-related death. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85 % of all diagnosed lung cancers [2]; it has an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 20 % [2]. In China, the majority of patients diagnosed with NSCLC have advanced stage disease and are unsuitable for curative surgery.

The leading causes of cancer treatment failure are recurrence and metastasis. One gene that contributes to these processes is metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 (MACC1). MACC1 is a critical regulator of the HGF/MET signaling pathway. It was first identified in colon cancer where it bound to the promoter of the MET gene to control its transcriptional activity [3, 4]. It has been shown to promote tumor cell migration and invasion in vitro and to induce tumor growth and metastasis in vivo [3, 5, 6]. MACC1 is considered an independent factor for prognosis and metastasis in colorectal cancer [3, 7]. Accumulating studies suggest that it could also be a prognostic and metastatic factor for other cancers, such as breast cancer [8], gastric carcinoma [9], hepatocellular carcinoma [10], renal pelvis carcinoma [11], malignant glioma [12], cervical carcinoma [13], and lung cancer [5].

Cancer stem cells (CSCs), also known as tumor-initiating cells, are a small population of cells within a tumor that have the capacity to self-renew and give rise to differentiated cell populations [14]. They are relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. These properties allow CSCs to repopulate tumors following treatment and lead to recurrence or metastasis [1517]. Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH) represent a family of enzymes located in the nucleus, cytoplasm, and mitochondria. ALDHs not only detoxify intracellular aldehydes or some cytotoxic drugs, but are also a key feature of CSCs [1719]. ALDH1, which mainly promotes the conversion of retinaldehyde to retinoic acid, plays an important role in cell proliferation and differentiation in vitamin A metabolism [2022]. Its overexpression can increase the risk of alcohol-related cancers [23]. Moreover, ALDH1 has been associated with metastasis and poor prognosis in many human cancers, such as breast cancer [24], ovarian cancer [17], lung cancer [18], and pancreatic cancer [25].

The involvement of MACC1 and ALDH1 in the recurrence and metastasis of NSCLC suggest that they could be valuable biomarkers for measuring disease progression and developing more accurate therapeutic strategies. To our knowledge, an association between MACC1 and ALDH1 in NSCLC has not yet been reported. In this study, we investigated the relationship between MACC1 and ALDH1 expression in patient tumor sections as well as compared their expression with the clinicopathology and prognosis of NSCLC.

Methods

Biopsy specimens

NSCLC tissues and adjacent noncancerous lung tissues were collected at the Department of Pathology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, from January 2008 to December 2009. Patients who had received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or other anti-cancer therapies, were excluded. All tissue samples were obtained with patient consent and the study was approved by the ethical committee of the Bengbu Medical College. The study group consisted of 240 patients, 160 males and 80 females, aged from 28–81 years; the average age was 58.3 ± 10.7 years. Tumor stage was assessed according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Of the 240 NSCLC tissue samples, 33 were grade I, 157 were grade II, and 50 were grade III. As for histological type, 160 were characterized as squamous cell carcinoma while the remaining 80 were adenocarcinoma.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry was performed according to the Elivision Plus detection kit instructions (Lab Vision, USA). Briefly, NSCLC- and corresponding normal lung tissues were fixed in 10 % buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Continuous 4 μm thick tissue sections were cut. All sections were deparaffinized and dehydrated with xylene and graded ethanol, then washed for 10 min in PBS (pH 7.2). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by incubation of sections in methanol containing 3 % hydrogen peroxide for 10 min at RT, they were then placed in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for antigen repair. After several washes in PBS, the sections were blocked with goat serum for 20 min at RT then incubated with mouse monoclonal antibody against human ALDH1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) or rabbit polyclonal antibody against human MACC1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h at 37 °C. All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, air-dried, and mounted. Negative controls were prepared by omitting primary antibodies from the staining procedure. MACC1 and ALDH1 positive staining was mainly located in the cytoplasm of cancer cells.

Evaluation of staining

Staining results were interpreted by two independent pathologists who were blind to clinical data and judged by semi-quantitative points. To overcome the intratumoral heterogeneity of antigen expression, ten visual fields from different areas of each NSCLC tumor were examined. If there was a disagreement, the observers would reexamine the section and reach a consensus [15, 2628]. Staining was scored according to intensity and extent. The staining intensity score was graded as: 0, none; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong. The extent of positive staining was graded as: 1, <10 %; 2, 11–50 %; 3, 51–75 %; and 4, >75 %. The intensity and extent scores were then multiplied to yield a final score that ranged from 0–12. Expression was considered positive when the score was ≥3. For tissues that were positive for both MACC1 and ALDH1, an average of the final score of each was taken.

Statistical analysis

Relationships between either MACC1- or ALDH1 protein expression and clinicopathological variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test or Chi-square test. The association between MACC1 and ALDH1 protein expression was compared using Spearman’s coefficient test. The effects of MACC1 and ALDH1 expression on survival were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Independent prognostic factors were determined using the Cox regression model for multivariate analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test for univariate overall survival analysis was used to assess the relationship between the positive expression of either MACC1 or ALDH1 and clinicopathological factors using SPSS 19.0 software for Windows (Chicago, IL). A value of P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

Expression of MACC1 and ALDH1 in NSCLC, and their relationship to clinicopathology

To evaluate the contributions of MACC1 and ALDH1 to NSCLC, their expression levels were assessed in both NSCLC and normal lung tissue sections using immunohistochemistry. These data were then compared to clinicopathological parameters. The positive rate of MACC1 protein expression was 64.2 % (154/240) in NSCLC tissues and 9.6 % (23/240) in normal lung tissues (Fig. 1a–b) and this difference was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.001). There were also significant differences between the positive expression of MACC1 and tumor grade (P = 0.015), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (P < 0.001), and tumor node metastasis (TNM) (P = 0.001). In contrast, there were no correlations detected between MACC1 expression and patient age (P = 0.622), gender (P = 0.341), tumor diameter (P = 0.490), location (P = 0.575), or histological type (P = 0.505).
Fig. 1

Representative results of MACC1 and ALDH1 in non-small cell lung cancer and control group. a: Control bronchiolar epithelial cells expressed MACC1 in the cytoplasm. b: MACC1 predominantly localized in the cytoplasm in moderately grade of squamous cell carcinoma (MACC1 × 400). c: Control bronchiolar epithelial cells expressed ALDH1 in the cytoplasm. d: ALDH1 predominantly localized in the cytoplasm in moderately grade of squamous cell carcinoma (ALDH1 × 400)

Similar to MACC1, the expression of ALDH1 was significantly greater in NSCLC- than in control tissues, with positive rates of 55.8 % (134/240) and 12.5 % (30/240), respectively (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1c–d). There were also positive correlations between high expression of ALDH1 in NSCLC and tumor grade, LNM, and TNM (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with squamous cell carcinoma had a higher positive rate of ALDH1 expression than did those with adenocarcinoma (P = 0.035). There were no associations detected between ALDH1 expression and patient age (P = 0.918), gender (P = 0.854), tumor diameter (P = 0.596), or location (P = 0.677) (Table 1).
Table 1

Correlation between the expression of MACC1 and ALDH1 and clinicopathololgical characteristics in NSCLC

Variable

MACC1

P value

ALDH1

P value

negative

positive

negative

positive

Tissue

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

 Normal

217

23

 

210

30

 

 NSCLC

86

154

 

106

134

 

Gender

  

0.341

  

0.854

 Male

54

106

 

70

90

 

 Female

32

48

 

36

44

 

Age (years)

  

0.622

  

0.918

  < 60

38

63

 

45

56

 

  ≥ 60

48

91

 

61

78

 

Gross type

  

0.575

  

0.677

 Central

60

102

 

70

92

 

 Peripheral

26

52

 

36

42

 

Histological type

  

0.505

  

0.035

 Squamous cell carcinoma

55

105

 

63

97

 

 Adenocarcinoma

31

49

 

43

37

 

Diameter of tumor

  

0.490

  

0.596

  < 3.0 cm

17

25

 

17

25

 

  ≥ 3.0 cm

69

129

 

89

109

 

Grade of tumor

  

0.015

  

<0.001

 Well

19

14

 

26

7

 

 Moderately

53

104

 

70

87

 

 Poorly

14

36

 

10

40

 

Lymph node metastasis

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

 No

56

60

 

84

32

 

 Yes

30

94

 

22

102

 

TNM stage

  

0.001

  

<0.001

 I

18

14

 

25

7

 

 II

38

50

 

60

28

 

 III

30

90

 

21

99

 

ALDH1 expression

  

<0.001*

   

 Negative

59

47

    

 Positive

27

107

    

*positive correlation

Univariate and multivariate analysis

Follow-up data showed that overall survival was significantly reduced in NSCLC patients with positive expression of MACC1 (42.1 months) compared to those who were MACC1-negative (54.2 months) (log-rank = 20.316, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2a). Similarly, the survival of ALDH1-positive patients (42.0 months) was significantly shorter than those whose tumors were negative (52.1 months) (log-rank = 17.065, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2b). Overall survival was also influenced by tumor grade, whereby NSCLC patients with low grade tumors survived significantly longer than those with tumors rated either moderate (log-rank = 12.826, P < 0.001) or poor (log-rank = 4.909, P = 0.027). There was no significant difference between the survival of patients with moderate or poor grade NSCLCs (log-rank = 1.524, P = 0.217) (Fig. 3a). Positive LNM was also linked with significantly reduced survival when compared with the no LNM group (log-rank = 11.148, P = 0.001) (Fig. 3b). The survival of stage I patients was significantly longer than that of those with either stage II (log-rank = 6.688, P = 0.010) or stage III NSCLC (log-rank = 16.359, P < 0.001). The survival of stage II patients was also significantly longer than that of those with stage III NSCLC (log-rank = 4.219, P = 0.040) (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by MACC1 and ALDH1 status (n = 240). The y-axis represents the percentage of patient; the x-axis, their survival in months. The green line represents patients with positive expression of MACC1 (a) or ALDH1 (b) with a trend of worse survival time than the blue line representing the negative MACC1 group or ALDH1 group (P < 0.001). Mean survival time was 42.1 months for the positive expression of MACC1 group and 54.2 months for the negative MACC1 group. Mean survival time was 42.0 months for the positive expression of ALDH1 group and 52.1 months for the negative ALDH1 group

Fig. 3

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by grade, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stages status (n = 240). The y-axis represents the percentage of patient; the x-axis, their survival in months. a The green line represents patients with moderate grade of NSCLC with a trend of worse survival time than the blue line representing the well grade group (P < 0.001). Mean survival time was 44.1 months for the moderate grade of NSCLC group and 58.2 months for the well grade of NSCLC group. The brown line represents patients with poor grade of NSCLC with a trend of worse survival time than the blue line representing the well grade group (P = 0.027). b The green line represents patients with LNM of NSCLC with a trend of worse survival time than the blue line representing the no LNM group (P = 0.001). c The green line represents patients with stageII of NSCLC with a trend of worse survival time than the blue line representing the stageIgroup (P = 0.010). The brown line represents patients with stage III of NSCLC with a trend of worse survival time than the blue line representing the stage I group (P < 0.001). The brown line represents patients with stage III of NSCLC with a trend of worse survival time than the blue line representing the stage II group (P = 0.040)

Multivariate analysis showed that positive expression of either MACC1 or ALDH1, as well as TNM stage, were independent prognostic factors for NSCLC (Table 2).
Table 2

Multivariate survival analysis of 240 patients with NSCLC

Covariate

B

SE

P value

Exp (B)

95 % CI

MACC1

0.505

0.166

0.002

1.657

1.198–2.292

ALDH1

0.468

0.181

0.010

1.597

1.120–2.279

TNM stage

0.887

0.259

0.001

2.428

1.461–4.034

Association between the expression of MACC1 and ALDH1 in NSCLC

Spearman association coefficient analysis revealed a positive association between the expression of MACC1 and that of ALDH1 (r = 0.368, P < 0.001).

Discussion

NSCLC is a highly heterogeneous disease. This heterogeneity may affect the reproducibility of biomarker assessment [29, 30]. Thorough investigation of the prognostic value of candidate biomarkers is thus required to ensure validity. In this study, we analyzed MACC1 expression in NSCLC and matched normal tissues from 240 patients and compared it to clinicopathological parameters. We found that MACC1 expression was significantly greater in NSCLC tissues than in normal lung tissues. Moreover, it was positively associated with tumor grade, LNM, and TNM. Our findings are consistent with previous studies in NSCLC [3135] suggesting that MACC1 could be useful as a clinical biomarker of NSCLC.

ALDH1, an intracellular enzyme related to retinoic acid, is widely regarded as a CSC marker in many cancers [18, 21, 25, 3638]. In NSCLC, ALDH1 has been associated with carcinogenesis [39] and shown to predict a poor response to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy [28]. In our study, we found that ALDH1 expression was significantly related to tumor grade, LNM, and TNM. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that NSCLC patients with positive ALDH1 expression had significantly reduced survival compared with that of those negative for ALDH1. These findings suggest that ALDH1 plays an important role in the tumorigenesis, development, progression, metastasis, and prognosis of NSCLC. Several other immunohistochemical studies that examined the metastatic and prognostic significance of ALDH1 in NSCLC patients obtained similar results [18, 40, 41]. In addition, because squamous cell carcinomas tend to develop more rapidly than andenocarcinomas, could this suggest that ALDH1 is a good biomarker for more aggressive NSCLC. This is also consistent with a previous study [42]. Thus, our findings support the notion that ALDH1 would be a reliable biomarker of NSCLC, in particularly for predicting metastasis and disease progression.

Recurrence and metastasis are the most common causes of deaths in NSCLC. TNM staging is well-known as the guide for designing therapeutic strategies for patients with NSCLC, however, it provides limited information on the biological behavior of the disease. It is thus critical to find novel and effective prognostic strategies to predict recurrence and metastasis in NSCLC patients. In this study, multivariate Cox model analysis suggested that the positive expression of either MACC1 or ALDH1, as well as TNM stage, are independent prognostic factors for patients with NSCLC.

Abnormal ALDH1 expression may be involved in the initiation and recurrence of NSCLC through its involvement in CSCs. Among other things, self-renewal, proliferation, and an aptitude for multiple differentiation allow CSCs to induce angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis to thereby access adequate nutrition and oxygen for rapid tumor growth. Indeed, the niche where CSCs reside mainly consists of vascular and lymphatic vessels.

Meanwhile, MACC1 contributes to tumorigenesis through the promotion of cancer cell proliferation and invasion through activation of the HGF/ Met signaling pathway [3, 4]. It is also involved in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis to promote tumor invasion and metastasis [43, 44]. In turn, these microvessels and microlymphantic vessels sustain CSCs that further promote tumor invasion and metastasis, thus creating a positive cycle of tumor advancement.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that aberrant expression of MACC1 and ALDH1 may play important roles in the development of NSCLC. The combined detection of MACC1 and ALDH1 may thus be valuable as markers for metastasis and thereby prognosis for patients with NSCLC.

Abbreviation

ALDH1: 

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1

CSCs: 

Caner stem cells

LNM: 

Lymph node metastasis

MACC1: 

Metastasis-associated in colon cancer 1

NSCLC: 

Non small cell lung cancer

PBS: 

Phosphate-buffered saline

TICs: 

Tumor initiating cells

TNM: 

Tumor-node-metastasis

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff members at the Department of Pathology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College for assistance with the data search and project management.

Funding

This work was supported by the Anhui Province Key Laboratory and Engineering Center (Bengbu Medical College) open issue plan (No.BYKL1412ZD) and the Nature Science Key Program of College and University of Anhui Province (No.KJ2015A269 and No.KJ2016A488) and Key projects of support program for outstanding young talents in Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province (No. gxyqZD2016160). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable requests.

Authors’ contribution

WSW, ZL, YL and ZB carried out the design, analysis of pathology and drafted the manuscript. GXM and SWQ carried out sample collections and coordination. WDN performed the immunohistochemical staining. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Tissue samples for diagnostic and research aims were obtained with each patients written consents and the research was approved by the ethical committee of Bengbu Medical College and performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Author information

Zhou L – associated professor of the Department of Pathology.

Yu L – associated professor of the Department of Pathology.

Zhu B – lecturer of the Department of Pathology.

Wu SW – associated professor of the Department of Pathology.

Song WQ – lecturer of the Department of Pathology.

Gong XM – associated professor of the Department of Pathology.

Wang DN – laboratory technician.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu Medical College

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ramalingam SS, Owonikoko TK, Khuri FR. Lung cancer: new biological insights and recent therapeutic advances. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:91–112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stein U, Walther W, Arlt F, Schwabe H, Smith J, Fichtner I, Birchmeier W, Schlag PM. MACC1, a newly identified key regulator of HGF-MET signaling, predicts colon cancer metastasis. Nat Med. 2009;15:59–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stein U, Smith J, Walther W, Arlt F. MACC1 controls Met: what a difference an Sp1 site makes. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:2467–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chundong G, Uramoto H, Onitsuka T, Shimokawa H, Iwanami T, Nakagawa M, Oyama T, Tanaka F. Molecular diagnosis of MACC1 status in lung adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemical analysis. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:1141–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ren B, Zakharov V, Yang Q, McMahon L, Yu J, Cao W. MACC1 is related to colorectal cancer initiation and early-stage invasive growth. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140:707–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ge Y, Meng X, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Ding Y. Positive MACC1 expression correlates with invasive behaviors and postoperative liver metastasis in colon cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:1094–100.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang Y, Zhang H, Cai J, Fang L, Wu J, Ye C, Zhu X, Li M. Overexpression of MACC1 and its significance in human breast cancer progression. Cell Biosci. 2013;3:16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang L, Lin L, Chen X, Sun L, Liao Y, Huang N, Liao W. Metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 promotes vasculogenic mimicry in gastric cancer upregulating Twist1/2. Oncotarget. 2015;6:11492–506.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Yang YP, Ou JH, Chang XJ, Lu YY, Bai WL, Dong Z, Wang H, An LJ, Xu ZX, Wang CP, Zeng Z, Hu KQ. High intratumoral metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 expression predicts poor outcomes of cryoablation therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2013;11:41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu H, Tian D, Chen T, Han R, Sun Y, Wu C. Metastasis-associated in colon cancer 1 is a novel survival-related biomarker for human patients with renal pelvis carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9, e100161.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagemann C, Fuchs S, Monoranu CM, Herrmann P, Smith J, Hohmann T, Grabiec U, Kessler AF, Dehghani F, Löhr M, Ernestus RI, Vince GH, Stein U. Impact of MACC1 on human malignant glioma progression and patients unfavorable prognosis. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15:1696–709.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo L, Lu W, Zhang X, Luo D, Zhang H. Metastasis-associated colon cancer-1 is a novel prognostic marker for cervical cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:4150–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Balic A, Dorado J, Alonso-Gómez M, Heeschen C. Stem cells as the root of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Exp Cell Res. 2012;318:691–704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu S, Yu L, Wang D, Zhou L, Cheng Z, Chai D, Ma L, Tao Y. Aberrant expression of CD133 in non-small cell lung cancer and its relationship to vasculogenic mimicry. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:535.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Curley MD, Garrett LA, Schorge JO, Foster R, Rueda BR. Evidence for cancer stem cells contributing to the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2011;16:368–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang S, Cui B, Lai H, Liu G, Ghia EM, Widhopf 2nd GF, Zhang Z, Wu CC, Chen L, Wu R, Schwab R, Carson DA, Kipps TJ. Ovarian cancer stem cells express ROR1, which can be targeted for anti-cancer-stem-cell therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:17266–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiang F, Qiu Q, Khanna A, Todd NW, Deepak J, Xing L, Wang H, Liu Z, Su Y, Stass SA, Katz RL. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a tumor stem cell-associated marker in lung cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2009;7:330–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim IG, Lee JH, Kim SY, Kim JY, Cho EW. Fibulin-3 negatively regulates ALDH1 via c-MET suppression and increases c-radiation-induced sensitivity in some pancreatic cancer cell lines. Biochem Biophy Res Commun. 2014;454:369–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Vasiliou V, Nebert DW. Analysis and update of the human aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) gene family. Hum Genomics. 2005;2:138–43.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhao D, Mo Y, Li MT, Zou SW, Cheng ZL, Sun YP, Xiong Y, Guan KL, Lei QY. NOTCH-induced aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 deacetylation promotes breast cancer stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:5453–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh S, Brocker C, Koppaka V, Chen Y, Jackson BC, Matsumoto A, Thompson DC, Vasiliou V. Aldehyde dehydrogenases in cellular responses to oxidative/electrophilic stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;56:89–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Druesne-Pecollo N, Tehard B, Mallet Y, Gerber M, Norat T, Hercberg S, Latino-Martel P. Alcohol and genetic polymorphisms: effect on risk of alcohol-related cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:173–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pan H, Wu N, Huang Y, Li Q, Liu C, Liang M, Zhou W, Liu X, Wang S. Aldehyde dehydrogenase1 expression correlates with the invasion of breast cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2015;10:66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Singh S, Arcaroli J, Thompson DC, Messersmith W, Vasiliou V. Acetaldehyde and retinaldehyde-metabolizing enzymes in colon and pancreatic cancers. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;815:281–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Li XS, Xu Q, Fu XY, Luo WS. ALDH1A1 overexpression is associated with the progression and prognosis in gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:705.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee K-H, Ahn E-J, Se-Jeong O, Kim O, Joo Y-E, Bae J-A, Yoon S, Ryu H-H, Jung S, Kim K-K, Lee J-H, Moon K-S. Kitenin promotes glioma invasiveness and progression associated with the induction of EMT and stemness markers. Oncotarget. 2015;6:3240–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ayub TH, Kewer-Paik MD, Debald M, Rostamzadeh B, Thiesler T, Schröder L, Barchet W, Abramian A, Kaiser C, Kristiansen G, Kuhn W, Kübler K. Accumulation of ALDH1-positive cells after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts treatment resistance and prognosticates poor outcome in ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6:16437–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lips EH, van Eijk R, de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, de Miranda NF, Oosting J, Karsten T, Eilers PH, Tollenaar RA, van Wezel T, Morreau H. Progression and tumor heterogeneity analysis in early rectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:772–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Koelzer VH, Herrmann P, Zlobec I, Karmitopoulou E, Lugli A, Stein U. Heterogeneity analysis of metastasis associated in colon cancer 1 (MACC1) for survival prognosis of colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:160.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhen T, Dai S, Li H, Yang Y, Kang L, Shi H, Zhang F, Yang D, Cai S, He Y, Liang Y, Han A. MACC1 promotes carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer via β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2014;5:3756–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Gao J, Ding F, Liu Q, Yao Y. Knockdown of MACC1 expression suppressed hepatocellular carcinoma cell migration and invasion and inhibited expression of MMP2 and MMP9. Mol Cell Biochem. 2013;376:21–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Meng F, Li H, Shi H, Yang Q, Zhang F, Yang Y, Kang L, Zhen T, Dai S, Dong Y, Han A. MACC1 down-regulation inhibits proliferation and tumourigenicity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells through Akt/β-catenin signaling pathway. PLoS One. 2013;8, e60821.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang Z, Cai M, Weng Y, Zhang F, Meng D, Song J, Zhou H, Xie Z. Circulating MACC1 as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for nonsmall cell lung cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141:1353–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang Z, Li Z, Wu C, Wang Y, Xia Y, Chen L, Zhu Q, Chen Y. MACC1 overexpression predicts a poor prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer. Med Oncol. 2014;31:790.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Miranda-Lorenzo I, Dorado J, Lonardo E, Alcala S, Serrano A, Clausell-Tormos J, Cioffi M, Megias D, Zagorac S, Balic A, Hidalgo M, Erkan M, Kleeff J, Scarpa A, Sainz Jr B, Heeschen C. Intracellular autofluorescence: a biomarker for epithelial cancer stem cells. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1161–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Shao C, Sullivan JP, Girard L, Augustyn A, Yenerall P, Rodriguez-Canales J, Liu H, Behrens C, Shay JW, Wistuba II, Minna JD. Essential role of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 for the maintenance of non-small cell lung cancer stem cells is associated with the STAT3 pathway. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:4154–66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Mizukami T, Kamachi H, Mitsuhashi T, Tsuruga Y, Hatanaka Y, Kamiyama T, Matsuno Y, Taketomi A. Immunohistochemical analysis of cancer stem cell markers in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:687.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Cao YT, Li JH, Wang YT, Fu YW, Xu J. Serum ALDHA1 is a tumor marker for the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Tumori. 2014;100:214–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shien K, Toyooka S, Soh J, Furukawa M, Maki Y, Muraoka T, Tanaka N, Ueno T, Asano H, Tsukuda K, Yamane M, Oto T, Kiura K, Miyoshi S. Prognostic impact of cancer stem cell-related markers in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with introduction chemoradiotherapy. Lung Cancer. 2012;77:162–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zenke Y, Ishii G, Ohe Y, Kaseda K, Yoshida T, Matsumoto S, Umemura S, Yoh K, Niho S, Goto K, Ohmatsu H, Kuwata T, Nagai K, Ochiai A. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression in cancer cells could have prognostic value for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who are treated with neoadjuvant therapy: identification of prognostic microenvironment factors after chemoradiation. Pathol Int. 2013;63:599–606.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dimou A, Neumeister V, Agarwal S, Anagnostou V, Syrigos K, Rimm DL. Measurement of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression defines a group with better prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Pathol. 2012;181:1436–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zheng Z, Gao S, Yang Z, Xie H, Zhang C, Lin B, Wu L, Zheng S, Zhou L. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 gene predict the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after transplantation. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11:142–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Sun L, Duan J, Jiang Y, Wang L, Huang N, Lin L, Liao Y, Liao W. Metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor-C/D to promote lymphangiogenesis in human gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;357:242–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement