Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Rationale and design of the multidisciplinary team IntervenTion in cArdio-oNcology study (TITAN)

  • Edith Pituskin1, 3, 5Email author,
  • Mark Haykowsky2,
  • Margaret McNeely1, 3,
  • John Mackey1, 3,
  • Neil Chua1, 3 and
  • Ian Paterson1, 4
BMC Cancer201616:733

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2761-8

Received: 9 September 2015

Accepted: 6 September 2016

Published: 15 September 2016

Abstract

Background

Cancer is the leading cause of premature death in Canada. In the last decade, important gains in cancer survival have been achieved by advances in adjuvant treatment. However, many oncologic treatments also result in cardiovascular "toxicity". Furthermore, cardiac risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus are known to contribute to the progression of cardiac damage and clinical cardiotoxicity. As such, for many survivors, the risk of death from cardiac disease exceeds that of recurrent cancer. While provision of care by multidisciplinary teams has been shown to reduce mortality and hospitalizations among heart failure patients, the effect of assessments and interventions by multidisciplinary specialists in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy regimens is currently unknown. Accordingly, we will examine the effect of a multi-disciplinary team interventions in the early assessment, identification and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in cancer patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy. Our main hypothesis is to determine if the incidence of LV dysfunction in cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy can be reduced through a multidisciplinary team approach.

Methods/design

This is a randomized study comparing intensive multidisciplinary team intervention to usual care in the prevention of LV remodeling in patients receiving anthracycline or trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Main objectives include early detection strategies for cardiotoxicity using novel biomarkers that reflect myocardial injury, remodeling and/or dysfunction; early identification and intensive treatment of cardiovascular risk factors; and early intervention with supportive care strategies including nutritional and pharmacist counselling, exercise training and cardiology team support. Secondary objectives include correlation of novel biomarkers to clinical outcomes; correlation of multidisciplinary interventions to adverse clinical outcomes; relationship of multidisciplinary interventions and chemotherapy dose density; preservation of lean muscle mass; and patient reported outcomes (symptom intensity and quality of life).

Discussion

Cardiac toxicity as a result of cancer therapies is now recognized as a significant health problem of increasing prevalence. To our knowledge, TITAN will be the first randomized trial examining the utility of multidisciplinary team care in the prevention of cardiotoxicity. We expect our results to inform comprehensive and holistic care for patients at risk for negative cancer therapy mediated sequelae.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01621659 Registration Date 4 June 2012.

Keywords

Multidisciplinary Heart failure Cardiac dysfunction Lymphoma Breast cancer

Background

As a result of improved anti-cancer therapies, many patients now experience long-term survival after treatment. However, cardiac toxicity of cancer therapy is increasingly recognized as a major risk, such that for many survivors, the risk of death from cardiac disease exceeds that of recurrent cancer [1]. Negative lifestyle behaviors not only account for at least of 30 % of cancer deaths, but are well established causative factors for cardiovascular disease. Overweight/obesity, low fruit and vegetable intake coupled with high fat diet, physical inactivity, smoking and alcohol use are firmly established cancer-promoting, modifiable behaviors [2]. On this background of significant baseline cardiovascular risk, the ‘multiple-hits’ to the cardiovascular system with adjuvant chemotherapy convey varying degrees of directly negative effects [3]. Therefore, there is urgent need for effective interventions in this population.

The most common manifestation of cardiotoxicity during or after cancer therapy is left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure (HF) [4]. Cancer therapy-associated toxicity has been proposed to occur acutely (during infusion), early (within the first year of therapy) and chronic (>1 year post-therapy) [4]. Limat observed early and frequent cardiotoxicity in 135 consecutive lymphoma patients treated with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine prednisone) [5]. Twenty-seven (20 %) patients suffered from a cardiac event within 1 year of treatment; among these, 14 patients had clinical signs of HF attributable to anti-cancer therapy. Long-term follow-up of patients after anthracycline-based therapies demonstrated abnormal cardiac function present in 18 % of patients followed up for less than 10 years and in 38 % of those followed for 10 years or more (median, 12 years) [6]. In 141 lymphoma patients assessed at least 5 years post-chemotherapy, Hequet observed subclinical cardiomyopathy in 39 (27.6 %) using echocardiography; associated risk factors included male gender, older age, and overweight [7]. Only 8 of these 39 patients received a doxorubicin dose > 300 mg/m2, indicating that even conservative doxorubicin dosing conveys long-term cardiac sequelae. These observations herald an emerging and potentially devastating health issue, as 60,000 patients per year are exposed to anthracyclines in the United States alone [8]. Maximizing the benefits and minimizing negative cardiac effects of anthracycline-based therapy is challenging. If cardiotoxicity is observed then anti-cancer treatment may be decreased or discontinued, potentially impacting remission rates [3]. Therefore, new approaches in early prevention and treatment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity are required.

Our group has observed high prevalence and negative influence of cardiovascular risk factors in breast cancer patients. In 41 breast cancer patients who had received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy, we showed that at ~20 months following completion of therapy survivors consistently had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors. Here, higher rates of overweight/obesity, low cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak ) and unfavorable lipid profiles were observed compared to controls [9]. In 47 women who had received chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, we again found consistently less favorable cardiovascular risk factors compared to controls. Higher resting heart rate and systolic blood pressure were observed; peak exercise output, stroke volume and cardiac power output were significantly lower in patients than controls [10]. While the cross-sectional designs limit our understanding of baseline characteristics, these results consistently identify significant clinical and sub-clinical negative cardiovascular effects of anti-cancer therapy. The major modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are well-established, and include tobacco use, high blood pressure (BP), high cholesterol, alcohol use, obesity and physical inactivity. Unfortunately, in oncology trials these risk factors have, to date, not been systematically examined. Retrospective reviews indicate modifiable cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension and coronary artery disease predict development of anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy [11, 12]. In patients receiving trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting, hypertension and high body mass index are associated with cardiac dysfunction [13, 14]. Taken together, research examining early identification of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and intensive management to prevent negative sequelae is urgently required.

Importantly, LV dysfunction is now recognized as a late effect of chemotherapy, not detectable until significant damage has already occurred [15]. Unfortunately, when cardiotoxicity is detected, cardiology services are consulted late, if at all, and improvement in clinical cardiac outcomes is not always possible. In women receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy, Cardinale showed a four-fold decrease in the chance of complete recovery from cardiac dysfunction for each doubling in time-to-heart failure treatment [16], emphasizing the urgency for early monitoring and intervention. Of note, the cardinal symptoms of HF (dyspnea, fatigue and edema) are common in cancer patients [17, 18], with 70–100 % reporting exercise intolerance and fatigue [19], and are difficult for the practitioner to distinguish from cardiac causes. Additionally, regular symptom inquiry [20, 21], routine vital sign measurements, and identification or management of cardiac risk factors [22, 23] are not routinely attended to in the oncology outpatient clinic. Taken together, these findings emphasize the importance of careful screening, early identification and intensive management of toxicities to ensure both adequate anti-cancer treatment is delivered on schedule and full dose, and that acute/chronic cardiovascular morbidity is prevented.

Patients at risk for or with cancer treatment-related cardiac effects are complex, multi-disease patients requiring multiple specialists [24], therefore, coordination of care by both cardiology and oncology specialties is urgently required. However, multiple challenges face clinicians managing this patient population including lack of: risk-stratification guidelines, distinguishing early toxicities, evidence-based cardiovascular monitoring schedules, and level 1 evidence for interventions. Furthermore, validation of new imaging techniques and improved biomarkers are necessary to individualize and monitor treatment.

Our main hypothesis is to determine if the incidence of LV dysfunction in cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy can be reduced through a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach

The main objectives include implementation of early detection strategies for cardiotoxicity with sensitive imaging modalities; early identification and intensive treatment of cardiovascular risk factors; and early intervention with supportive care strategies including nutritional counselling, pharmacist support, exercise training and cardiology team support. Secondary objectives include correlation of novel biomarkers to clinical outcomes; correlation of MDT interventions to adverse clinical outcomes; relationship of MDT interventions and chemotherapy dose density; preservation of lean muscle mass; and patient reported outcomes (symptom intensity and quality of life).

Methods/design

TITAN (multidisciplinary Team IntervenTion in cArdio-oNcology) is a randomized study comparing intensive multidisciplinary team intervention to usual care in the prevention of LV remodeling in patients receiving anthracycline or trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Additional inclusion requirements are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

• Patients receiving anthracycline or trastuzumab-based chemotherapy.

• Histologically confirmed malignancy;

• Age > 18 years, and

• No contraindication to MRI.

• Physical disability preventing exercise testing or DEXA scan;

• Psychiatric disease or disorder precluding informed consent;

• Contraindication to anti-cancer therapy, including known heart failure, cardiomyopathy, or baseline LV ejection fraction less than 50 %;

• Previous anthracycline or trastuzumab-based therapy;

• Previous radiotherapy to thorax.

Methods

The TITAN study underwent full Board review and was approved by the University of Alberta Health Research Ethics Board—Biomedical Panel. Potential participants are consecutively identified at Tumor Board review of all newly diagnosed cases of early breast cancer and lymphoma scheduled for chemotherapy (anthracycline and/or trastuzumab-based). Following primary oncologist approval, a study coordinator provides potential participants with an overview of the study and written information. Written informed consent to participate in the TITAN study is obtained from all participants. After informed consent, participants are scheduled for a baseline clinic visit for final determination of eligibility.

Clinical assessments include physical examination, cardiovascular history, symptomatology and risk factor profile. Smoking status, vital signs, menstrual status, weight and height will acquired. Cardiac MRI, coronary artery calcium score (cardiac CT) and body composition (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry, or DEXA) will be acquired. Maximal aerobic capacity (peak pulmonary oxygen uptake or VO 2peak) is evaluated with an incremental exercise test; continuous expired gas analysis is performed with a metabolic measurement system. Heart rate and cuff blood pressure are measured at each stage; the highest oxygen consumed over 1-min will be used as the peak VO2 score [25, 26]. Upper and lower extremity maximal strength testing is also assessed. Detailed range of motion assessments are performed by an expert physiotherapist. In addition to clinically indicated laboratory, brain natriuretic protein, high-sensitivity troponin and research biofluids (collagen remodeling products, urine) are collected. Fasting lipid profile will be collected at baseline. Total energy expenditure and activity energy expenditure are evaluated with a SenseWear armband, worn by the participant for 4 days [27]. Quality of life will be assessed with instruments validated in cancer populations (‘Screening for Distress’ [28] and MDASI-HF [29], both based on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [30]). Each assessment will occur at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Our primary outcome is measure of left ventricular ejection fraction at 12 months.

After baseline assessments, participants will be randomized 1:1 to multidisciplinary intervention or usual care (Fig. 1)

Fig. 1

Flow chart TITAN Study

  • Group 1: Multidisciplinary Team Intervention

    Patients randomized to the MDT arm will be assessed by the cardio-oncology team, and receive regular clinical assessment. Blood pressure and lipid profile targets will be guided by national guideline consensus documents [31, 32]. Counselling and written information regarding optimal nutrition will be provided by a registered dietician. As indicated, a clinical pharmacist will offer ongoing monitoring and support of any prescribed medications. Patients will be encouraged to participate in a supervised exercise training program consisting of endurance and resistance training twice per week and unsupervised endurance exercise (walking and/or cycling) exercise training another 1–2 days per week. During the first 3–4 months, moderate-intensity continuous aerobic training (30 to 60 min at 60 to 80 % peak VO2) will be performed on a cycle ergometer or treadmill. Thereafter, participants will perform moderate intensity contimuous exercise (1 day/week) and high-intensity aerobic interval training. Participants will also perform 1–3 sets of moderate upper (bench press, lattissimus dorsi puldown, shoulder press, arm curl and tricep extension) to lower extremity (leg press, leg extension and leg curl) resistance training (10 to 15 repetitons with weight added after 3 sets are completed while adhering to strict technique). All subjects will be given an exercise diary to record exercises performed, training heart rate, weight lifted and rate of perceived exertion.

  • Group 2: Usual Care

    Patients randomized to usual care will receive standard anti-cancer therapy and standard clinical monitoring.

Blinding and masking

The exercise assessments (baseline, 6 months and 1 year) are performed at a different facility by different staff than the supervised exercise training team. The cardiac MRI interpreter is blinded to the group assignment.

Sample size calculations

The incidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in early breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab has been reported as approximately 10 % in randomized clinical trials [33] and up to 22 % in non-trial community based practice [34]. The 1 year incidence of left ventricular dysfunction of early breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines is not well characterized. In a randomized, placebo controlled trial on the prevention of cardiotoxicity of cancer patients receiving high dose anthracyclines, the incidence of LV dysfunction at 1 year was 43 % in the control arm vs. 0 % in the treatment arm [35]. Extrapolating from these results, we estimate that the 1 year incidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in our combined cohort of patients receiving trastuzumab and/or anthracyclines will be 15 % in those patients receiving usual care. Patients will be analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. For patients attending the multidisciplinary clinic and receiving early pharmacologic intervention, we estimate the 1 year incidence of LV systolic dysfunction at 5 %. Given the high accuracy and reproducibility of cardiac MRI [36], with a two tailed significance level ∞ = 0.05 and power = 0.80 then 36 participants are required in each group. We anticipate a 10 % drop-out rate and a 3 % mortality during the 1 year follow-up so aim to recruit 40 patients in each arm.

Data management

Study data are collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University of Alberta [37]. REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) is a secure, web-based application designed to support data capture for research studies, providing 1) an intuitive interface for validated data entry; 2) audit trails for tracking data manipulation and export procedures; 3) automated export procedures for seamless data downloads to common statistical packages; and 4) procedures for importing data from external sources. Research biospecimens are stored within the Alberta Cancer Research Biobank [38] and maintained according to established standard operating procedures.

Safety

Maximal exercise testing is safe for patients with early and metastatic cancer; the exercise protocol in this study has been used in healthy older subjects, cardiac patients and breast cancer survivors [10, 25, 26]. Participants experience normal effects of maximal exercise testing including sore muscles and temporary post-exercise fatigue.

Discussion

Cardiac toxicity as a result of cancer therapies is now recognized as a significant health problem of increasing prevalence. Not only deleterious cardiac effects, but negative impacts on the entire oxygen cascade and multiple organ systems highlight the need for multiple interventional approaches as we will undertake here. To our knowledge, TITAN is the first randomized trial examining the effect of multidisciplinary team interventions in the prevention of chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity. We expect that, in the short-term, this study will find that early multidisciplinary care will maintain cardiac geometry and enhance patient-reported quality of life. In the long-term, we anticipate that early supportive care interventions will prevent deleterious cardiovascular effects of cancer treatment, and improve overall survival (both cancer and cardiovascular). We also expect this work to inform new approaches in the delivery of comprehensive and holistic care in patients at risk for cancer therapy-mediated cardiovascular toxicity.

Conclusion

Patients at risk for or with cancer treatment-related cardiac effects are complex, multi-disease patients requiring multiple specialists. The TITAN Study will provide high-level evidence in the development of guidelines for multidisciplinary preventive initiatives, locally, nationally and internationally. Lastly, this work will inform and support other long-term goals of our cardio-oncology team, in the prevention, detection and treatment of cardiovascular effects of cancer therapies.

Abbreviations

CHOP: 

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine prednisone

CT: 

Computerized tomography

DEXA: 

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

HF: 

Heart failure

LV: 

Left ventricle

MDT: 

Multidisciplinary team

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

VO2 peak

Peak pulmonary oxygen uptake

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the cancer patients participating in this project.

Funding

Supported by an investigator-initiated research grant from the University Hospital Foundation/Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton Alberta, Canada. The Foundation had no role in the project development, in the preparation of this manuscript, nor the decision to publish.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable—this study protocol is currently in progress, with data collection ongoing.

Authors’ contributions

EP conceived the study, participated in design and coordination and drafted the manuscript. MH participated in study design and development of participant training protocols. MM participated in design of interventions and participant training protocols. JM participated in study design and participant recruitment. NC participated in study design. IP conceived the study, participated in design and coordination. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Competing interest

There is no competing interest to declare on the part of any named author.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Multidisciplinary Team IntervenTion in CArdio-ONcology (TITAN Study) was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board, Biomedical Panel, Study ID Pro00028600, 9 July 2012. Written informed consent to participate in the TITAN study is obtained from all participants.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Alberta
(2)
University of Texas
(3)
Cross Cancer Institute
(4)
Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute
(5)
4-256 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta

References

  1. Hanrahan EO, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Giordano SH, Rouzier R, Broglio KR, Hortobagyi GN, et al. Overall survival and cause-specific mortality of patients with stage T1a, bN0M0 breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2007;25(31):4952–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand SS, Yusuf S: Stemming the global tsunami of cardiovascular disease. The Lancet. 2011;377(9765):529–32.Google Scholar
  3. Jones LW, Haykowsky MJ, Swartz JJ, Douglas PS, Mackey JR. Early breast cancer therapy and cardiovascular injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(15):1435–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wells QS, Lenihan DJ: Reversibility of left ventricular dysfunction resulting from chemotherapy: can this be expected? Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;53(2):140–48.Google Scholar
  5. Limat S, Demesmay K, Voillat L, Bernard Y, Deconinck E, Brion A, et al. Early cardiotoxicity of the CHOP regimen in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(2):277–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Steinherz LJ, Steinherz PG, Tan CT, Heller G, Murphy ML. Cardiac toxicity 4 to 20 years after completing anthracycline therapy. JAMA. 1991;266(12):1672–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hequet O, Le QH, Moullet I, Pauli E, Salles G, Espinouse D, et al. Subclinical Late Cardiomyopathy After Doxorubicin Therapy for Lymphoma in Adults. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(10):1864–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardinale D, Colombo A, Sandri MT, Lamantia G, Colombo N, Civelli M, et al. Increased perioperative N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels predict atrial fibrillation after thoracic surgery for lung cancer. Circulation. 2007;115(11):1339–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones LW, Haykowsky M, Peddle CJ, Joy AA, Pituskin EN, Tkachuk LM, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Profile of Patients with HER2/neu-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Anthracycline-Taxane-Containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy and/or Trastuzumab. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Pub Am Assoc Canser Res Am Soc Prev Oncol. 2007;16(5):1026–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones LW, Haykowsky M, Pituskin EN, Jendzjowsky NG, Tomczak CR, Haennel RG, et al. Cardiovascular reserve and risk profile of postmenopausal women after chemoendocrine therapy for hormone receptor—positive operable breast cancer. Oncologist. 2007;12(10):1156–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yeh ET. Cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapy and antibody therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:485–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yeh ET, Tong AT, Lenihan DJ, Yusuf SW, Swafford J, Champion C, et al. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management. Circulation. 2004;109(25):3122–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Suter TM, Procter M, van Veldhuisen DJ, Muscholl M, Bergh J, Carlomagno C, et al. Trastuzumab-associated cardiac adverse effects in the herceptin adjuvant trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(25):3859–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tan-Chiu E, Yothers G, Romond E, Geyer Jr CE, Ewer M, Keefe D, et al. Assessment of cardiac dysfunction in a randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, with or without trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy in node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(31):7811–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zuppinger C, Timolati F, Suter TM. Pathophysiology and diagnosis of cancer drug induced cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2007;7(2):61–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cardinale D, Colombo A, Lamantia G, Colombo N, Civelli M, De Giacomi G, Rubino M, Veglia F, Fiorentini C, Cipolla CM: Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy: clinical relevance and response to pharmacologic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;55(3):213–20.Google Scholar
  17. Chu TF, Rupnick MA, Kerkela R, Dallabrida SM, Zurakowski D, Nguyen L, et al. Cardiotoxicity associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. Lancet. 2007;370(9604):2011–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Force T, Krause DS, Van Etten RA. Molecular mechanisms of cardiotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibition. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(5):332–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofman M, Ryan JL, Figueroa-Moseley CD, Jean-Pierre P, Morrow GR. Cancer-related fatigue: the scale of the problem. Oncologist. 2007;12 Suppl 1:4–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Janjan NA, Cleeland CS. Pain and suffering during cancer therapy: continued sins of omission. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(1):6–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fromme EK, Eilers KM, Mori M, Hsieh YC, Beer TM. How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(17):3485–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97(18):1837–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenihan DJ. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Can Promising New Therapy Associated With Cardiac Toxicity Strengthen the Concept of Teamwork? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(32):5154–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lenihan DJ, Esteva FJ. Multidisciplinary Strategy for Managing Cardiovascular Risks When Treating Patients with Early Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2008;13(12):1224–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hung C, Daub B, Black B, Welsh R, Quinney A, Haykowsky M. Exercise training improves overall physical fitness and quality of life in older women with coronary artery disease. Chest. 2004;126(4):1026–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Haykowsky M, Vonder Muhll I, Ezekowitz J, Armstrong P. Supervised exercise training improves aerobic capacity and muscle strength in older women with heart failure. Can J Cardiol. 2005;21(14):1277–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mackey DC, Manini TM, Schoeller DA, Koster A, Glynn NW, Goodpaster BH, Satterfield S, Newman AB, Harris TB, Cummings SR et al.: Validation of an Armband to Measure Daily Energy Expenditure in Older Adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(10):1108–13.Google Scholar
  28. Carlson LE, Bultz BD. Cancer distress screening. Needs, models, and methods. J Psychosom Res. 2003;55(5):403–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fadol A, Mendoza T, Gning I, Kernicki J, Symes L, Cleeland CS, et al. Psychometric testing of the MDASI-HF: a symptom assessment instrument for patients with cancer and concurrent heart failure. J Card Fail. 2008;14(6):497–507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, MacMillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991;7(2):6–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Anderson TJ, Grégoire J, Hegele RA, Couture P, Mancini GBJ, Mcpherson R, et al. Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Adult. Can J Cardiol. 2012;29(2):151–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Daskalopoulou SS, Rabi DM, Zarnke KB, Dasgupta K, Nerenberg K, Cloutier L, et al. Canadian Hypertension Education Program Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(5):549–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Panjrath GS, Jain D. Trastuzumab-induced cardiac dysfunction. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28(2):69–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McArthur HL, Chia S. Cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(1):94–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cardinale D, Colombo A, Sandri MT, Lamantia G, Colombo N, Civelli M, et al. Prevention of high-dose chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in high-risk patients by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Circulation. 2006;114(23):2474–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bellenger NG, Davies LC, Francis JM, Coats AJ, Pennell DJ. Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2000;2(4):271–8.Google Scholar
  37. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2011;42(2):377–81.Google Scholar
  38. Alberta Cancer Research Biobank [http://www.acrb.ca/)]. Accessed March 2016.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement