Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Label-free blood serum detection by using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and support vector machine for the preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 4 and
  • 2Email author
BMC Cancer201515:650

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1653-7

©  Yan et al. 2015

  • Received: 18 December 2014
  • Accepted: 17 September 2015
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

It is difficult for the parotid gland neoplasms to make an accurate preoperative diagnosis due to the restriction of biopsy in the parotid gland neoplasms. The aim of this study is to apply the surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) method for the blood serum biochemical detection and use the support vector machine for the analysis in order to develop a simple but accurate blood serum detection for preoperative diagnosis of the parotid gland neoplasms.

Methods

The blood serums were collected from four groups: the patients with pleomorphic adenoma, the patients with Warthin’s tumor, the patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma and the volunteers without parotid gland neoplasms. Au nanoparticles (Au NPs) were mixed with the blood serum as the SERS active nanosensor to enhance the Raman scattering signals produced by the various biochemical materials and high quality SERS spectrum were obtained by using the Raman microscope system. Then the support vector machine was utilized to analyze the differences of the SERS spectrum from the blood serum of different groups and established a diagnostic model to discriminate the different groups.

Results

It was demonstrated that there were different intensities of SERS peaks assigned to various biochemical changes in the blood serum between the parotid gland tumor groups and normal control group. Compared with the SERS spectra of the normal serums, the intensities of peaks assigned to nucleic acids and proteins increased in the SERS spectra of the parotid gland tumor serums, which manifested the differences of the biochemical metabolites in the serum from the patients with parotid gland tumors. When the leave-one-sample-out method was used, support vector machine (SVM) played an outstanding performance in the classification of the SERS spectra with the high accuracy (84.1 % ~ 88.3 %), sensitivity (82.2 % ~ 97.4 %) and specificity (73.7 % ~ 86.7 %). Though the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity decreased in the leave-one-patient-out cross validation, the mucoepidermoid carcinoma was still easier to diagnose than other tumors.

Discussion

The specific molecular differences of parotid gland tumors and normal serums were significantly demonstrated through the comparison between the various SERS spectra.But compared with the serum SERS spectra reported in the other studies, some differences exist between the spectra in this study and the ones reported in the lietratures. These differences may result from the various nano-particles, the different preparation of serum and equipment parameters, and we could need a further research to find an exact explanation.Based on the SERS spectra of the serum samples, SVM have shown a giant potential to diagnose the parotid gland tumors in our preliminary study. However, different cross validaiton methods could effect the accuracy and a further study involing a great number of samples should be needed.

Conclusions

This exploratory research demonstrated the great potential of SERS combined with SVM into a non-invasive clinical diagnostic method for preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. And the internal relation between the spectra and patients should be established in the further study.

Keywords

  • Parotid gland tumor
  • SERS
  • SVM
  • Preoperative diagnosis
  • Nanoparticle

Background

Among the neoplasms arising in the salivary glands, the parotid gland tumors are the most common with a frequency about 80 % [1, 2]. The accurate preoperative diagnosis of the parotid gland tumors is very essential and important clinically, because the discrimination between the benign and malignant tumors influences the following management of the optimal surgical procedures [2, 3]. Unfortunately, the routine biopsy is not recommended in the parotid gland tumors due to the possibility of the implantation metastasis and facial nerve injury [2]. Although the fine needle aspiration biopsy is considered as a well-established diagnostic technique in the preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors, it can still lead to some defects and limits such as hematoma and bacterial infection. Meanwhile, the result of fine needle aspiration biopsy could be influenced by the experiences of the operator and pathologist [2, 4–6]. So it is important and essential to develop a new technique to make an accurate and noninvasive preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors.

Raman spectroscopy is a vibrational spectroscopic technique based on the inelastic scattering, which can reflect the molecular structures and changes of samples and considered as the molecular ‘fingerprint’ [7–9]. Due to the technical advances in the Raman spectroscopy system instruments and application of multivariate analytic algorithm, the potential use of Raman spectroscopy has been widely developed in tumor diagnostics [2, 10, 11]. Compared with other optical diagnostic technique, Raman spectroscopy owns the advantages such as non-invasive, high spatial resolution, weak water scattering and no sample preparation [10, 12, 13]. However, the signal of Raman spectrum produced by a smaller number of photons (approximately 1 in 106 to 1 in 108) is very weak and covered by a strong autofluorescence background in some cases [14]. These drawbacks hindered the further clinical application in tumor diagnosis. In order to overcome these drawbacks, the increased excitation laser power and collection time were used, but these resulted in the changes and damages of biochemical samples. So the surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is developed and becomes a promising solution. The SERS is based on the effect of surface-enhanced Raman scattering that the signal of Raman scattering can be greatly enhanced by 105–1014 when the molecules are absorbed onto nanostructured metal or colloid surfaces [16–18]. Because of the increased Raman scattering cross-section and high sensitivity, SERS can overcome the drawback of regular Raman spectroscopy and is applied successfully in the diagnosis and discrimination of various tumors [16, 18, 19].

The successful use of Raman spectroscopy in the ex vivo diagnosis of the parotid gland tumors has been reported in our previous studies [2, 20]. Due to the interference of the superficial skin and subcutaneous tissues, the Raman spectroscopy of parotid gland tumors cannot be obtained successfully in our in vivo study. Previous studies have shown that the plasma or serum levels of RNA, DNA and other biochemical materials changed in patients with cancer and the SERS of peripheral blood, plasma or serum could be used to detect the presence of cancer with a high sensitivity and specificity [16, 18, 21, 22]. So the SERS of peripheral blood could provide an opportunity for non-invasive preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. In this study, we firstly developed the method of blood serum detection by using SERS based on label-free Au nanoparticles to diagnose the parotid gland tumors preoperatively. The support machine vector is applied to analyze the differences between the SERS data and discriminate the patients from healthy subjects.

Methods

Subjects and protocol

In this study, all the patients with the parotid gland tumors were divided into the pleomorphic adenoma (PA) group, the Wartin’s tumor (WT) group and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) group. Then the patients with old maxillofacial fracture and healthy volunteers were selected as the normal control group. The more detailed information on the subjects was shown in Table 1. All the subjects in this study were not treated prior to this study, didn’t have any other systemic diseases or drug abuse, and their blood routine and biochemistry examinations were all in the normal range. The final diagnoses of patients with the parotid gland tumors were carried out by two experienced pathologists after the surgical operation according to the World Health Organization histological criteria [23]. All the subjects participated in this study were informed detailedly and gave their written informed consent at the beginning of the study. This study was approved by the Institution Review Board of West China Hospital of Stomatology and followed the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration.
Table 1

Information on these subjects in this study

Information

Group

PA

WT

MEC

Normal

Age (year)

    

 Age range

28–68

35–74

29–79

18–65

 Median age

41

59

43

35

Gender

    

 Male

8

17

10

20

 Female

12

4

9

11

Total

20

21

19

31

Blood serum samples

After 10 h of overnight fasting, a single 5 ml peripheral blood sample was obtained from the subjects at 8:00 A.M. without any anticoagulant. Then the blood sample was deposited at 4 °C for 4 h and centrifuged at 3400 rpm (2722 g) for 10mins in order to remove the blood cells, fibrinogen and platelet. After the centrifugation, the blood serum was obtained and 1 ml supernatant was collected as the serum sample and stored at −20 °C for Raman measurement.

Preparation of Au NPs

Au NPs were prepared through the deoxidizing process according to the method reported by Frens [24]. A beaker of 100 ml of 0.1 g/L HAuCl4 was heated to the rolling boil and then added the 0.7 ml of 10 g/L sodium citrate rapidly. The mixed solution was heated to keep boiling and stirred continuously for 30mins. During this process, the color of the solution changed from pale yellow to burgundy due to the production of Au NPs. The nanoparticle form of the Au NPs prepared in the above method was spherical with a mean diameter of 55 nm and the UV-visible absorption spectrum shown a significant absorption at 550 nm (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a The UV/visible absorption spectra of the Au NPs, serum and the mixture of Au NPs and serum. b SERS spectrum of serum, normal Raman spectrum of serum and background Raman spectrum of the Au NPs colloid. c The SEM images of Au NPs. d The SEM images of the mixture of Au NPs and serum

SERS measurement

A 4 ml Au NPs solution was centrifuged at 6000 rpm (3219 g) for 10mins,discarded the supernatant and added a 0.4 ml serum sample for the SERS measurement. Before the SERS measurement, the mixed solution was incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. Then a drop of the mixed solution was transferred onto the coverslip for the SERS detection. The confocal Raman micro-spectrometer system (Renishaw, Great Britain) was employed for the SERS measurement of the serum sample using a 633 nm excitation laser. The excitation laser with a power of approximately 0.4 W was focused on 4–6 regions of each drop for the SERS spectral record through a × 50 objective lens (NA = 0.75). The spectra were recorded in the 200–1800 cm–1 Raman shift range with a 2 cm−1 spectral resolution and a 10s integration time.

Data analysis

The raw spectral data were preprocessed by WiRE 2.0 software (Renishaw, Great Britain) before the Data statistical analysis in order to remove the interference noises and oversaturated spectra. The LABSPEC 2.0 software (HORIBA Scientific, France) was utilized to remove the autofluorescence background by the 4th polynomial function and smooth the SERS spectra by the Savitzky-Golay smoothing. And all the smoothed SERS spectra were normalized in the region of 200–1800 cm−1.

Then the preprocessed data were put into the OriginPro8.0 software(OringinLab, USA) to calculate and produce the mean spectrum of each group. The comparison between the spectra of parotid gland tumors group and normal group were made through the subtraction of different mean spectra and the shifts of the different peaks in the subtracted spectral were assigned to the molecular structures and biochemical component based on the previous studies and literatures [15–18, 25–31] (Table 2).
Table 2

Raman shifts of peaks and the characteristic assignments [15–18, 25–31]

Raman shift (cm−1)

Peak assignment

292–296

Au-S band

543–548

S-S disulfide stretching in Proteins

723–727

Hypoxanthine

744–747

Thymine in DNA

933

C-C stretching mode, C-C αhelix in proteins

1084

C-C stretching mode in phospholipids

1094

C-N stretching mode in D-Mannos

1127

C-C stretching in lipids, C-N stretching in D-Mannos

1140

Carotenoids

1261–1264

CH bending in lipids

1326–1329

CH vibration in DNA/RNA, CH2 twisting in lipids

1368–1373

Guanine in DNA, Tryptophan in proteins

1441–1445

CH2, CH3 bending in proteins and lipids

1541–1551

C-N stretching, Amide II

1607

C = C band in Phenylalanine or Tyrosine

1698–1699

Amide I

In the process of training SVM, the Gaussian radial basis function was selected and the Jackknife method was employed to optimize the penalty parameter C and kernel-related parameter gamma [20]. Then in the process of testing SVM, the leave-one-sample-out and leave-one-patient- out methods were utilized to test the prediction performance of the diagnostic model established in the process of training SVM. And when the leave-one-patient-out method was applied, all spectra from one patient were left out to test the prediction. Due to the classification of tumor and normal samples, the process of discrimination and diagnosis was divided into two steps as reported in the previous literature [20]. First, the SVM was employed to discriminate the tumor groups from the normal group. Then, the tumor group were classified and diagnosed by SVM respectively. In order to value the efficiency of the model developed by SVM, the employed parameters were as following: the specificity (SP), sensitivity (SE), accuracy (ACC), Matthew correlation coefficient (MCC) and rigidity (R).

Result

SERS spectra

In the UV-visible absorption spectra shown as Fig. 1a, the pure serum samples absorption band appeared in the around 420 nm wavelength region and the band of Au NPs appeared in the around 550 nm wavelength region. When the Au NPs were mixed with the serum, the intense of their assigned absorption bands reduced and the shapes of peaks changed. This result was believed to originate from the localized surface plasmon resonance of Au NPs deposited on the biochemical substances in serum [15, 28]. Compared with the normal Raman spectrum, there was a dramatic increase in the intensity of serum SERS, which was resulted from the surface enhance effect produced by Au NPs [Fig. 1b]. The SEM images of the pure Au NPs and the mixture of Au NPs and serum were shown in the Fig. 1c and d respectively. The SEM image showed the conjunction of Au NPs and biochemical substances in serum.

After the SERS measurement, a total of 454 SERS spectra were obtained successfully from the 91 serum samples, including 101 spectra of PA samples, 105 spectra of WT samples, 95 spectra of MEC samples and 153 spectra of normal samples. The mean SERS spectra of different samples before the spectral normalization were shown in the Fig. 2. Then compared with the normalized mean SERS spectra of the normal groups, the PA groups showed the increase in the peaks at 548, 724, 747, 933, 1094, 1328, 1371, 1445, 1698 cm−1 but the decrease in the peaks at 295, 1551, 1607 cm−1, which was shown in the subtracted spectrum in Fig. 3a. There were also differences in the mean SERS spectra between the normal groups and the WT groups, the subtracted spectra in Fig. 3b showed the increase in the peaks at 296, 450, 543, 727, 744, 1084, 1140, 1264, 1326, 1373, 1444 and 1699 cm−1 but the only decrease in the peak at 1548 cm−1. The subtracted spectrum from the MEC and normal groups showed the increase in the peaks at 548, 723, 934, 1127, 1329, 1368 and 1441 cm−1 but the decrease in the peaks at 292, 1261, 1541 and 1607 cm−1, which was shown in the Fig. 3c. All these peaks can be assigned to different biochemical components and molecular structures such as nucleic acids and proteins, and in order to better understand the different peaks in the subtracted spectra, Table. 2 lists the characteristic assignments of peaks at different Raman shifts based on the previous literatures and studies. In the parotid tumors groups, compared with the normal groups, the intensities of peaks at the 720–750 cm−1 and 900–1450 cm−1 regions increased, which were assigned to the molecular structures in the nucleic acids, proteins and lipids, but the intensities of peaks at the around 1500–1600 cm−1 region decreased, which were assigned to some special molecular bond or vibration. The assignments of major peaks can be shown in Table 2. And based on these differences of peaks, the spectra of different tumors and normal groups can be classified and diagnosed.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The average Raman spectra of PA, WT, MEC and normal control samples. (a: The average spectrum of PA. b: The average spectrum of WT. c: The average spectrum of MEC. d: The average spectrum of normal samples). The gray areas manifest the standard deviations

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

a Comparison of the PA and normal group. b Comparison of the WT and normal group. c Comparison of the MEC and normal group

SVM diagnosis

In order to develop effective diagnostic algorithms for differentiation between the parotid tumor groups and normal group, the process of SVM diagnosis contains two steps. The first step was to discriminate the normal samples from the parotid tumor samples respectively, in which the normal samples were selected as the positive group and the parotid tumors as the negative group. As the result of the leave-one-sample-out method, 78 of 101 PA spectra, 78 of 105 WT spectra and 91 of 95 MEC spectra were classified correctly in the first step. According to the above results, the SVM could diagnoses the different spectra from the parotid tumors and normal samples successfully, and the parameters SP, SE, ACC, MCC and R of the SVM diagnostic results were shown in the Table 3. Then the diagnosis of different parotid tumor samples was also carried out by using SVM in the second step. The results showed that SVM achieved an acceptable performance on the classification of different parotid gland tumors. And the parameters SP, SE, ACC, MCC and R in the second step were shown in Table 4. And when the leave-one-patient-out method was applied, 58 of 101 PA spectra, 54 of 105 WT spectra and 61 of 95 MEC spectra were classified correctly in the first step. And the results of the classification by this method were shown in Tables 5 and 6.
Table 3

The parameters of the ‘Leave-one-sample’ classification results of the spectra from parotid tumor samples and normal samples using SVM

Parameter

Normal vs PA

Normal vs WT

Normal vs MEC

SP

77.2 %

74.3 %

73.7 %

SE

93.5 %

90.8 %

97.4 %

ACC

87.5 %

84.1 %

88.3 %

MCC

0.727

0.668

0.755

R

0.780

0.737

0.765

Table 4

The parameters of the ‘Leave-one-sample’ classification results of the spectra from the different parotid tumor samples using SVM

Parameter

PA vs WT

PA vs MEC

WT vs MEC

SP

86.7 %

82.1 %

86.3 %

SE

82.2 %

90.1 %

84.8 %

ACC

84.5 %

86.2 %

85.5 %

MCC

0.689

0.725

0.710

R

0.832

0.812

0.836

Table 5

The parameters of the ‘Leave-one-patient’ classification results of the spectra from parotid tumor samples and normal samples using SVM

Parameter

Normal vs PA

Normal vs WT

Normal vs MEC

SP

79.1 %

79.1 %

93.5 %

SE

57.4 %

51.4 %

64.2 %

ACC

70.5 %

67.8 %

82.3 %

MCC

0.371

0.328

0.621

R

0.663

0.639

0.862

Table 6

The parameters of the ‘Leave-one-patient’ classification results of the spectra from the different parotid tumor samples using SVM

Parameter

PA vs WT

PA vs MEC

WT vs MEC

SP

57.4 %

69.5 %

78.9 %

SE

57.1 %

68.3 %

67.6 %

ACC

57.3 %

68.9 %

73.0 %

MCC

0.159

0.389

0.473

R

0.256

0.555

0.684

Discussion

In clinical examination, the blood samples are easily collected and mostly reflect some vital subtle change caused by tumors in the metabolism environment, such as amino acid metabolism, miRNA expression and biomarkers generation [32–34]. The concentration of nucleic acids and the composition of proteins from the serum and plasma samples of tumor patients are different from the normal samples, which are believed to originated from apoptosis, tumor necrosis and associated metabolites [22]. So in our exploratory study, blood serum detection is appropriate for the preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. It would be a revolution of tumor screening by using SERS to detect periphery blood samples for the preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors.

In our study, the specific molecular differences of parotid gland tumors and normal serums were significantly demonstrated through the comparison between the various SERS spectra. These differences or alterations would be related with the proliferation and metabolism of tumors. In the comparison between the tumors and normal serums, the SERS peaks at around 723–727 cm−1 and 744–747 cm−1 assigned to the hypoxanthine and thymine in nucleic acids manifested the higher intensity in the parotid gland tumor groups, which could be resulted from the active metabolism of nucleic acids in the patients with parotid gland tumors. This result is also in agreement with the studies on the Raman spectra of parotid gland tumor tissues [2, 20]. The SERS peak at around 1326–1329 cm−1 was assigned to the CH vibration structure in nucleic acids, and the increased intensity of this peak in parotid gland tumor groups also suggested that there was an increased amount of nucleic acids in the serums from the patients with parotid gland tumors. This difference can be explained by the increased cell-free nucleic acids which originated from the apoptosis, necrosis and release of intact cells in the bloodstream and their subsequent lysis [16]. In the previous studies, the alteration of the nucleic acids in the tumorous blood samples could be detectable by SERS,so the SERS signal assigned to the nucleic acids in the serums can be employed as spectroscopic diagnostic biomarker to screen and monitor the occurrence of parotid gland tumors [15, 16, 18]. The SERS peaks at around 933 cm−1, 1084 cm−1, 1094 cm−1, 1368–1373 cm−1 and 1441–1445 cm−1 are attributed to the relative molecular structures in proteins. The higher intensities of these SERS peaks assigned to proteins in the parotid gland tumor serums demonstrated that there was an increase in the amount of relative proteins in the parotid gland tumor serums. Redistribution or translocation of plasma free amino acids in cancer patients was reported in the previous literature and the level of plasma free amino acids was related with the cancer type [32]. And the amount of these amino acids in plasma would increase in some cancers such as the breast cancer because these cancers does not grow as fast as the metabolically active cancers [32]. So these increased SERS peaks attributed to proteins in the serums can be employed as a diagnostic indicator to discriminate the parotid gland tumor serums from the normal ones. Meanwhile, there are some other differences existing in the SERS peaks of different parotid gland tumors, which may be due to the tumors’ various metabolisms and also can be considered as the diagnostic references. But compared with the serum SERS spectra reported in the other studies, some differences exist between the spectra in this study and the ones reported in the lietratures [29, 30]. These differences may result from the various nano-particles, the different preparation of serum and equipment parameters, and we could need a further research to find an exact explanation.

Based on the SERS spectra of the serum samples, an advanced algorithm is required to develop and establish an powerful diagnostic system. Numerous algorithms have been employed to analyze the Raman data such as principle component analysis (PCA), discrimination function analysis (DFA), partial least squares (PLS) and support vector machine (SVM). Compared with the other algorithms, SVM have been applied more extensively in many studies such as drug design, prediction of protein structure and diseases diagnosis due to its remarkable generalization performance [20, 35]. It is reported that SVM could classify and diagnose the oral squamous cell carcinoma based on the Raman spectra with the accuracy of approximate 98 % [25]. However, SVM is more powerful for the problem with small sampling, nonlinear and high dimension, and the increase of samples will waste more time and decrease the classification performance [35, 36, 37]. In this study, in order to reduce analytical errors, the process of classification by using SVM consisted of two step as reported in the previous study [20]. When the leave-one-sample-out method was applied for cross validation, the SERS spectra of tumorous serums and normal serums were classified and diagnosed successfully with an average accuracy of 86 %. But the accuracy of the classification carried out by the leave-one-patient-out cross validation decreased, the reason could be that only 4–6 independent spectra could not totally represent the differences in the serum of one patient. So in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy, the internal relation between the patient and spectrum should be explored and established in the further study. However, the classification results carried out by the two cross validation methods all manifested that WT was easier to be misdiagnosed as normal than MEC and PA probably due to the differences between benign and malignant tumors. Among the types of parotid gland tumors researched in this study, WT is benign tumor and MEC is malignant tumor. Although PA is benign tumor, it is considered as the critical tumor with the malignant degeneration potential [38]. So in the second step, MEC could be easier to be discriminated from PA and WT due to the diverse biological characters of the parotid gland tumors, which was also in agreement with the result in the study of Raman spectra of parotid gland tumor tissues [20]. But Beleites et al. demonstrate that the test sample sizes are necessary to achieve reasonable precision in the validation, too small sample size situation will completely mask the learning curve [39]. So this result of our preliminary study carried out by SVM could only demonstrate the potential to diagnoses and classify the different parotid gland tumors by SERS and SVM, and a further study involving a great number of samples should be needed. And the epidemiological characteristics of various tumors resulted in the differences and unbalances of the age and gender in the groups, which could interfere the diagnostic results of this study, it is also needed a large sample size experiment to give an explicit explanation.

Conclusion

According to our knowledge, this is the first time to report that the SERS combined with SVM could be employed successfully to discriminate the serum samples of the patients with parotid gland tumors from the ones of the normal subjects and carry out a preoperative diagnosis of the parotid gland tumors. The differences existing in the SERS spectra of different samples manifested that the alterations of the biochemical metabolites in the serums from the patients with parotid gland tumors and normal control subjects. The serum SERS combined with SVM algorithm may have a giant potential to apply in the preoperative diagnosis and screening of parotid gland tumors if the further study could establish the relation between the spectra and patients.

Abbreviations

SERS: 

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

NPs: 

Nanoparticles

SVM: 

Support vector machine

PL: 

Pleomorphic adenoma

WT: 

Warthin’s tumor

MEC: 

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

SP: 

Specificity

SE: 

Sensitivity, ACC, accuracy

MCC: 

Matthew correlation coefficient

R: 

Rigidity

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge the support from Prof. Bin Ren, Dr. Xiaoshan Zheng (the State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Xiamen University, China).

Funding

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81172578) and the Project of Science and Technology of Xiamen City (Grant No. 3502Z20134007).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the First Affiliated Hosipital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
(2)
State Key Laboratory of Oral disease, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
(3)
College of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
(4)
Department of Stomatology, the First Affiliated Hosipital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

References

  1. Przewozny T, Stankiewicz C. Neoplasms of the parotid gland in northern Poland, 1991–2000: an epidemiologic study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;261(7):369–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yan B, Li Y, Yang G, Wen ZN, Li ML, Li LJ. Discrimination of parotid neoplasms from the normal parotid gland by use of Raman spectroscopy and support vector machine. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(5):430–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Shahat HME, Fahmy H, Gouhar GK. Diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for parotid gland tumors. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2013;44(2):203–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Boerner SL. Patterns and pitfalls in fine needle aspiration of salivary gland. Current Diagnostic Pathology. 2003;9:339–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Jandu M, Webster K. The role of operator experience in fine needle aspiration cytology of head and neck masses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;28:441–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Salama AA, EI-Barbary, Mlees MA, Esheba GE. Value of apparent diffusion coefficient and magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the identification of various pathological subtypes of parotid gland tumors. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.cjrnm. 2014.09.005.
  7. Xue L, Sun P, Ou D, Chen P, Chen M, Yan B. Diagnosis of pathological minor salivary glands in primary Sjogren’s syndrome by using Raman spectroscopy. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(2):723–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lau DP, Huang Z, Lui H, Man CS, Berean K, Morrison MD, et al. Raman spectroscopy for optical diagnosis in normal and cancerous tissue of the nasopharynx-preliminary findings. Laser Surg Med. 2003;32:210–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Brauchle E, Schenke-Layland K. Raman spectroscopy in biomedicine-non-invasive in vitro analysis of cells and extracellular matrix components in tissues. Biotechnol J. 2013;8:288–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guze K, Pawluk HC, Short M, Zeng H, Lorch J, Norris C, et al. Pilot study: Raman spectroscopy in differentiating premalignant and malignant oral lesions from normal mucosa and benign lesions in humans. Head Neck. 2014. doi:10.1002/hed.23629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lui H, Zhao J, McLean D, Zeng H. Real-time Raman spectroscopy for in vivo skin cancer diagnosis. Cancer Res. 2012;72:2491–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Guze K, Short M, Zeng H, Lerman M, Sonis S. Comparison of molecular images as defined by Raman spectra between normal mucosa and squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity. J Raman Spectrosc. 2011;42:1232–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Cals FLJ, Bakker Schut TC, Koljenovi S, Puppels GJ, de Jong RJB. Method development: Raman spectroscopy-based histopathology of oral mucosa. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2013;44:963–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris AT, Rennie A, Waqar-Uddin H, Wheatley SR, Ghosh SK, Martin-Hirsch DP, et al. Raman spectroscopy in head and neck cancer. Head Neck Oncol. 2010;2:26–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin D, Pan J, Huang H, Chen G, Qiu S, Shi H, et al. Label-fress blood plasms test based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering for tumor stages detection in nasopharyngeal cancer. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4751. doi:10.1038/srep04751.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Feng S, Chen R, Lin J, Pan J, Chen G, Li Y, et al. Nasopharyngeal cancer detection based on blood plasma surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. Biosens Bioelectron. 2010;25(11):2414–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Feng S, Lin J, Cheng M, Li YZ, Chen G, Huang Z, et al. Cold nanoparticle based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy of cancerous and normal nasopharyngeal tissues under near-infrared laser excitation. Appl Spectrosc. 2009;63:1089–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Feng S, Chen R, Lin J, Pan J, Wu Y, Li Y, et al. Gastric cancer detection based on blood plasma surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy excited by polarized laser light. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;26:3167–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kast RE, Serhatkulu KG, Cao A, Pandya AK, Dai H, Thakur JS, et al. Raman spectroscopy can differentiate malignant tumors from normal breast tissues and detect early neoplastic changes in a mouse model. Biopolymers. 2008;89:235–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yan B, Wen Z, Li Y, Li L, Xue L. An intraoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors using Raman spectroscopy and support vector machine. Laser Phys. 2014;24:115601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Warawdekar UM, Zingde SM, Iyer KSN, Jagannath P, Mehta AR, Mehta NG. Elevated levels and fragmented nature of cellular fibronectin in the plasma of gastrointestinal and head and neck cancer patients. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2006;372:83–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris AT, Lungari A, Needham CJ, Smith SL, Lones MA, Fisher SE, et al. Potential for Raman spectroscopy to provide cancer screening using a peripheral blood sample. Head Neck Oncol. 2009;1:34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Gale N, Plich BZ, Sidransky D, Westra W, Califano J. World Health Organization classificaiton of tumors. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, editors. Pathology and genetics Head and neck tumors. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005. p. P.246.Google Scholar
  24. Frens G. Controlled nucleation for the regulation of the particle size in monodisperse gold suspensions. Nature Phys Sci. 1973;241:20–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Li Y, Wen ZN, Li LJ, Li ML, Gao N, Guo YZ. Research on the Raman spectral character and diagnostic value of squamous cell carcinoma of oral mucosa. J Raman Spectrosc. 2010;41:142–7.Google Scholar
  26. Lin J, Chen R, Feng S, Pan J, Li Y, Chen G, et al. A novel blood plasma analysis technique combining membrane electrophoresis with silver nanoparticle-based SERS spectroscopy potential application in noninvasive cancer detection. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2011;7:655–63.Google Scholar
  27. Casella M, Lucotti A, Tommasini M, Bedoni M, Forvi E, Gramatica F, et al. Raman and SERS recognition of β-carotene and haemoglobin fingerprints in human whole blood. Spectrochimica Acta Part A. 2011;79:915–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kah JCY, Kho KW, Lee GGL, Richard CJ, Sheppard, Shen ZX, et al. Early diagnosis of oral cancer based on the surface plasmon resonance of gold nanoparticle. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007;2(4):785–98.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Li S, Zhang Y, Xu J, Li L, Zeng Q, Lin L, et al. Noninvasive prostate cancer screening based on serum surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and support vector machine. Applied Physics Letters. 2014;105:091104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin D, Feng S, Pan J, Chen Y, Lin J, Chen G, et al. Colorectal cancer detection by gold nanoparticle based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of blood serum and statistical analysis. Optics Express. 2011;19:13565–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu P, Zheng XS, Zong C, Li MH, Zhang LY, Li W, et al. Drop-coating deposition and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopies (DCDRS and SERS) provide complementary information of whole human tears. Journal of Raman spectroscopy. 2014;45:565–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Lai HS, Lee JC, Lee PH, Wang ST, Chen WJ. Plasma free amino acid profile in cancer patients. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15(4):267–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wittmann J, Jack HM. Serum microRNAs as powerful cancer biomarkers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1806(2):200–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hocker JR, Peyton MD, Lerner MR, Mitchell ST, Lightfoot SA, Lander TJ, et al. Serum discrimination of early-stage lung cancer patients using electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry. Lung Cancer. 2011;74(2):206–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao CY, Zhang RS, Liu HX, Xue CX, Zhao SG, Zhou XF, et al. Diagnosing anorexia based on partial least squares, back propagation neural network, and support vector machines. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004;44:2040–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lv G, Cheng H, Zhai H, Dong L. Fault diagnosis of power transformer based on multi-layer SVM classifier. Electric Power Systems Research. 2005;75:9–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu XC, Yang GP, Feng WF, Zhou X. Reduced set based support vector machine for hyperspectral imagery classification. Computer Science. 2010;37:268–70.Google Scholar
  38. Zbaren P, Tschumi I, Nuyens M, Stauffer E. Recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland. Am J Surg. 2005;189:203–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Beleites C, Neugebauer BT, Krafft C, Popp J. Sample size planning for classification models. Analytical Chimica Acta. 2013;760:25–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yan et al. 2015

Advertisement

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us