Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Cancer

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The role of multipotent cancer associated fibroblasts in hepatocarcinogenesis

  • Caecilia Hapsari Ceriapuri Sukowati1, 2Email author,
  • Beatrice Anfuso2,
  • Lory Saveria Crocé1, 2 and
  • Claudio Tiribelli1, 2
BMC Cancer201515:188

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1196-y

Received: 9 October 2014

Accepted: 16 March 2015

Published: 27 March 2015

Abstract

Background

The presence of tumor supporting cells in various cancer, including in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has become an important target in the study of carcinogenesis. The cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF), one of the most important cellular components in the cancer stroma, might contribute to the progression of the disease due to its plasticity, a behavior of the stem cells. In this study, we investigate the significance of the CAF and its role in the HCC progression and metastasis.

Methods

Primary CAF and non-tumoral fibroblast (NTF) from nine paired HCC and distant non-tumoral liver tissues were isolated and cultured. The cells were characterized by flow cytometry, RT-PCR, anchorage-independent assay and in vitro cells directed trans-differentiation. Co-culture study was performed in Transwell system and xenograft assay was performed in immunodeficient mice.

Results

CAF and NTF were positive for CD90, CD44, αSMA, and vimentin and negative for CD34, CD45, CD117, and CD133. When stimulated, they showed the potential to differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and pancreatic cells. When co-cultured with human HCC cell lines, CAF up-regulated gene expressions of TGFB1 and FAP of HuH-7 and JHH-6 while NTF did not induced either of the genes. Xenograft assay showed that the CAF had the capacity to enter into circulation as confirmed by RT-PCR and DNA sequencing.

Conclusion

Our data provides evidence of the plasticity of the CAF and the NTF as stem cells in the process of hepatocarcinogenesis and metastasis. These cells mutually interacts with HCC cells. Their trans-differentiation flexibility may induce a switch from normal to cancerous microenvironment.

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinomaCancer-associated fibroblastsStromaStem cellsCancer stem cellsMicroenvironment

Background

Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer in men and the ninth in women, and the second most common cause of cancer-related death, estimated to be responsible for around 9% of all cases in 2012 [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 85% to 90% of liver cancer cases [2].

Recent studies had shown the importance of the cross talk between cancer cells and their stromal microenvironment, including in the HCC. The cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF), sometimes acknowledged as cancer stromal cell, is the most important cell type in the stroma. Previously, Mazzocca et al. had demonstrated an interaction between CAF and HCC cells. The CAF appeared essential for tumor growth and metastasis and the HCC cells stimulated the proliferation of the CAF. HCC invasive cells produced high levels of the connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and generated tumor with high stromal component in vivo. The use of transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) inhibitor was shown to inhibit tumor specific neoangiogenesis and to interrupt their cross talk, thus inhibiting tumor progression [3,4]. Interestingly, CAF-like myofibroblastic phenotype can be originated from peritumoral tissue fibroblasts (PTF) in the presence of lysophostatidic acid (LPA) secreted by HCC cells [5].

Due to its cellular heterogeneity and various physiological functions of the liver, the cellular origin of the CAF in HCC is still unclear. They can be derived from different sources such as resident fibroblast, migrated bone-marrow stem cell, or epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Previously, it had been demonstrated that the CAF in HCC have the characteristics of the multipotent resident progenitor cells through a paracrine mechanism [6].

Despite mounting evidences on the effect of the CAF in the disease progression in other cancers, its role in hepatocarcinogenesis is still undefined. In this paper, we report the potential of the stem cells-like fibroblasts present in HCC and cirrhotic liver tissue to trans-differentiate into other cell types. Data shows that this cell population plays an important role in the maintenance and the progression of liver disease.

Methods

Ethics

For human samples, written informed consent was obtained from patient or by a legal representative and patient anonymity has been preserved. Investigation was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. For animal study, the experimental procedure study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. The Ethical Committee Ateneo of the University of Trieste and responsible administration of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Italy approved the protocol (Permit number: 107/2010).

Primary cells isolation

Paired fresh HCC and distant cirrhotic liver tissues were obtained from nine HCC patients undergoing partial hepatic resection. The ratio of female:male was 5:4, mean age 73 ± 7 years; three were hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive and six were metabolic-related HCC. None of the patients received previous liver surgery, radiofrequency, and trans-arterial chemoembolization.

Tissues were finely minced with scalpel in a tissue culture dish and enzymatically dissociated in 1 mg/mL collagenase type IV (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) at 37°C for 1 hour with frequent shaking. The activity of collagenase was blocked using phosphate saline buffer (PBS) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Single cells suspension was washed and filtered through a 40 μm cell strainer (BD Biosciences, Milan, Italy). Cells were plated on a 100 mm dish in MyeloCult® medium (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) in the presence of 1 μM hydrocortisone sodium succinate and 1% antibiotics. They were maintained in a controlled CO2 incubator with 37°C, 95% humidity, 5% CO2 with medium change every three days and sub-cultured with 0.05% trypsin in PBS when they reached 80% - 90% of confluence. Morphological homogeneity of the cells were noticed along subcultures. Cells from passages 2–6 were used for all experiments. The primary cells from HCC nodules were identified as CAF while cells from distant non-tumoral tissues as NTF (non-tumoral fibroblast).

HCC cell lines

Human HCC cell lines HuH-7 (JCRB0403) and JHH-6 (JCRB1030) were obtained from the Japan Health Science Research Resources Bank (HSRRB, Tokyo, Japan). HuH-7 cells were grown in DMEM medium (high glucose) and JHH-6 in Williams’ E medium. Both media were supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% antibiotics. All cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator and were routinely sub-cultured with 0.05% trypsin in PBS when they reached 85% - 95% confluence.

Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence

The presence of surface marker antigens was detected using antibodies CD90/THY1 (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada), CD133/PROM1, CD45 (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), CD44 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and STRO-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA). After detachment, at least two million cells per mL were incubated with specific first antibodies for 60 minutes on ice in the dark. After two washings with PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), when necessary, the cells were incubated with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibody for 60 minutes on ice in the dark. Flow cytometric analysis was performed immediately in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, NJ, USA). Ten thousands events were analysed per sample.

The presence and localization of the proteins CD90, CD44, Vimentin/Vim (Abcam), and alpha smooth muscle actin/αSMA (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) were visualized with immunofluorescence using fluorescence microscope Leica DM2000 (Leica Camera AG, Solms, Germany). The nucleus of the cells was stained with Hoechst 33342 dye (Sigma-Aldrich).

Total RNA isolation and reverse transcription

Total RNA was extracted using TriReagent (Sigma–Aldrich) according to the manufacture’s protocol. RNA was quantified at wavelength 260 nm in a DU®730 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullertone, CA, USA) and RNA purity was evaluated according the MIQE guidelines [7] by measuring the ratio A260/A280 with an appropriate purity value between 1.8 and 2.0. The integrity of RNA was assessed on standard 1% agarose/formaldehyde gel. Reverse transcription of 1 μg of total RNA was done using iScript cDNA synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

Real time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RTqPCR)

RTqPCR was performed according to the iQ SYBR Green Supermix protocol. PCR amplification was carried out in a 15 μL reaction volume containing 25 ng of cDNA, 1x iQ SYBR Green Supermix, and 250 nM gene specific sense and anti-sense primers and reaction was run on a Bio-Rad iQ5 real-time PCR detection system (IQ5 software version 3.1; Bio-Rad Laboratories), together with reference genes RNA18S and β-actin (ACTB). Cycling parameters were determined and analyzed using the Pfaffl modification of ΔΔCt equation with taking account to the efficiency of the reaction [8,9]. The primers for PCR were designed using software Beacon Designer Version 7.9 (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Primer sets were built across two exons to avoid the contamination of genomic DNA. Nucleotide BLAST was performed to check the specificity of the sequences. Melting curve analysis and agarose gel electrophoresis were carried out to assess the size of the template products. The list of the primers sequences was listed in Supplemental File (Additional file 1: Table S1). Control for of primers: total RNA extract from IHH cells for CD90; HuH-7 cells for CD133 [10,11]; Jurkat cells for CD34; and HCC tissues and blood samples for CD44, CD45, CD29, CD31, CD105, CD166, CD11B, CD13, CD19, CD29, and CD79.

Clonogenic assay

The clonogenic capacity of the CAF in a 3-dimensional anchorage-independent matrix was performed by growing the cells at low density of 5000 cells/mL in 67% Matrigel (BD Biosciences) in growth medium without serum on a 12-well cell culture plate. The clones were observed under light microscope every three days (Nikon Eclipse TS100, Nikon Instruments, Campi Bisenzio, Italy).

Trans-differentiation: adipogenic, osteogenic, and pancreatic

For adipocyte differentiation, cells were plated in AdipoDiff medium (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) for 3 weeks with medium change every 4 days. The accumulation of fat deposit was stained using Nile Red, a specific intercellular lipid staining, and the up-regulation of gene PPARG (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma) was quantified using RTqPCR. For osteoblast differentiation, cells were plated in OsteoDiff medium (Miltenyi Biotec) for 2 weeks. Alkaline phosphatase activity was detected using Sigma Fast BCIP/NBT substrate (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacture’s protocol. The up-regulations of bone-specific genes were quantified using RTqPCR. The protocol for pancreatic cells differentiation was performed according previous reports in the presence of 10 mM nicotinamide [12,13]. The identification of cells was performed using RTqPCR on gene somatostatin (SST) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP). Direct DNA sequencing was carried out to confirm the result (automated sequencer ABI Prism 3500xl genetic analyser, Applied Biosystems, Monza, Italy).

Co-culture with HCC cells

A total 50,000 cells/mL of CAF were co-cultured together with 100,000 cells/ml of HuH-7 and JHH-6 cells for 7 days in a 6-well plate of Transwell system (Corning Costar, Milan, Italy). The alteration of tumor promoting factors was evaluated by way of RTqPCR. For comparison, co-culture between NTF and both HCC cell lines was also performed in the similar condition. The experiment was conducted in duplicates in two independent sets.

Xenograft assay

Male 7 weeks athymic nude (Foxn1(nu/nu)) homozygotes and NOD/SCID (NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/NCrHsd) mice for in vivo xenotransplantation studies were obtained from Harlan Laboratories, Srl (Udine, Italy). All animals were maintained in the animal facility of the University of Trieste. After detachment, CAF was suspended in 100 μL cold PBS and placed in ice. A total of 50,000 to 1 million cells were injected subcutaneously into abdomen of the nude mouse in duplicates or orthotopic in the liver of NOD/SCID mice. Viability of the cells was checked by tryphan blue staining dye after injection. The xenotransplantated mice together with control were observed for four months after injection. Mouse body weight was measured every week. Serum alanin transferase (ALT) and aspartate transferase (AST) levels on sacrifice day were measured by photometric enzymatic test (Cobas, Roche, Mannheim, Germany).

Statistical analysis

Students’ t test was performed for statistical comparison between groups using software InStat Version 3.05 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set to p < 0.05.

Results

Morphology and characterization of the cells

Primary cells from HCC (CAF) and from cirrhotic tissue (NTF) were obtained. All cells showed fibroblastic-like morphology and they had the ability to form clonal colonies after plating in low density. The presence of surface markers proteins was detected by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. CAF showed higher percentages of antigens CD90 and CD44 (52 ± 27% and 59 ± 22%, respectively) as compared to NTF (37 ± 28% and 74 ± 12%), however the differences were not statistically significant. Hematopoietic cells markers CD133, CD45, and STRO-1 were either negative or very low expressed (Figure 1A).
Figure 1

The phenotypes of primary cells CAF and NTF. A. Flow cytometric analysis of surface marker proteins showed the positivity for CD90 and CD44, and the negativity for CD133, CD45, and STRO-1. Black graph: control, White graph: positive expression. B. Morphology of the cells and localization of positive proteins CD90, CD44, αSMA, and Vimentin. Scale bar, 100 μm. C. mRNA expressions of vimentin (VIM) and αSMA (ACTA2) in CAF and NTF. VIM and ACTA2 mRNA relative expressions were normalized to reference genes RNA18S and ACTB. D. 3D clonogenic capacity of the CAF in Matrigel. Scale bar, 100 μm.

The localizations of positive proteins CD90, CD44, Vim, and αSMA were visualized by immunofluorescence. As expected, CD90 and CD44 proteins were mainly localized on the cell membrane while αSMA and Vim in the cytoplasm (Figure 1B). When we compared the mRNA expression of the αSMA (ACTA2), we observed that ACTA2 expression was higher in CAF compared to NTF, but less noticeable for VIM (Figure 1C).

To assess the clonogenic capacity of the CAF as one of the characteristics of stem cells, CAF was grown in a 3-dimensional anchorage-independent matrix in Matrigel. As shown on Figure 1D, a single cell formed a colony three days after plating.

The presence of other cell markers was identified using RT-PCR, based on the consensus for the mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and previous reports of multipotent hepatic stem cells [12,14]. As expected, qualitative PCR result showed that both CAF and NTF were positive for MSC markers CD90, CD44, CD29, CD13, CD105 and CD166, and negative for hematopoietic cells markers CD34, CD117, and CD45 (Table 1).
Table 1

The genotypes of the primary cells

 

CAF

NTF

 

+

-

+

-

MSC requirement

CD90*

CD11B*

CD90*

CD11B*

 

CD44

CD14*

CD44

CD14*

 

CD29*

CD19*

CD29*

CD19*

 

CD13

CD79*

CD13

CD79*

 

CD105*

CD117

CD105*

CD117

 

CD166

CD34*

CD166

CD34*

  

CD45*

 

CD45*

Mesenchymal marker

ACTA2

 

ACTA2

 
 

VIM

 

VIM

 

Pluripotency markers

OCT4

 

OCT4

 
 

SOX2

 

SOX2

 

Reference

18S

 

18S

 
 

ACTB

 

ACTB

 

The mRNA analysis by RT-PCR of consensus markers of MSC, mesenchymal activation, and pluripotency factors. + = positive expression, − = negative expression. *The reference standard based on the Mesenchymal and Tissue Stem Cell Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy [14].

Adipogenic, osteogenic, and pancreatic trans-differentiation

In total, nine primary cells CAF and NTF were subjected to adipogenic, osteogenic, and pancreatic in vitro differentiation in inducer medium. In adipogenic differentiation, by using Nile Red staining we observed lipid depositions in cytoplasm in five out of six samples induced (83%), in both CAF and NTF. However, a significant PPARG mRNA up-regulations was noticed only in NTF differentiation, with the mean increase of 2.31 ± 0.29 fold compared to basal level (p < 0.05). Induced CAF did not show an increment in PPARG mRNA expression (Figure 2A-B).
Figure 2

Cells-directedin vitrodifferentiation of the CAF and the NTF. A-B. Adipogenic differentiation. Nile Red staining of lipid deposition (arrow indicated) in the cytoplasm (A). RTqPCR result showed the mean of PPARG gene regulation (B). C-D. Osteogenic differentiation. Alkaline phosphatase staining of macro- (upper panel) and microscopic visualization (lower panel). Scale bar, 100 μm (C). RTqPCR result of osteogenic differentiation genes osteocalcin (BGLAP), bone sialoprotein (IBSP), osteopontin (OPN), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and osteonectin (ON) (D). E-G. Endodermic differentiation. The qualitative result of the induction of somatostation (SST) and gastric inhibitory protein (GIP) using gel electrophoresis (E). RTqPCR result of endodermic differentiation genes showed an induction/up-regulation of SST and GIP. NIC = nicotinamide. The target mRNA expression was normalized to reference gene β-actin (F). Confirmation by DNA sequencing of human SST. SST_HCC3 = DNA sequences of SST from induced CAF, NM_001048.3 = reference DNA sequences from GenBank (G). For RTqPCR data, basal expression was considered as 1.00, target mRNA expressions were normalized to reference genes RNA18S and ACTB. Scale bar, 100 μm. *p < 0.05.

In osteogenic differentiation, induced CAF and NTF were positive for alkaline phosphatase staining. CAF and NTF showed similar tendencies on the regulation of bone-specific genes, with clear up-regulations of bone sialoprotein (IBSP), osteocalcin (BGLAP) and osteopontin (OPN) and down-regulations of osteonectin (ON) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) (p < 0.05) (Figure 2C-D).

When CAF and NTF were subjected to trans-differentiation into pancreatic cells with the presence of 10 mM nicotinamide, induced CAF and NTF showed a clear up-regulation of GIP with the means of mRNA increase of 3.3 ± 2.0 fold and 7.9 ± 10.1 fold, respectively. Moreover, SST mRNA was found to be strongly increased after the induction. DNA sequencing confirmed the specificity of SST DNA sequence (Figure 2E-G).

Co-culture study

To investigate the difference between CAF and NTF in hepatocarcinogenesis and to explore the cross talk between these cells with HCC cells, a co-culture study in a Transwell system was performed. The HuH-7 and JHH-6 HCC cell lines were chosen to represent well- and poor-differentiated HCC cells, respectively. mRNA analysis showed that in basal condition, both CAF and NTF expressed higher level of fibroblast activated protein (FAP), ACTA2, and collagen type 1 (COL1) compared to those of HuH-7 and JHH-6 (p < 0.01 for all genes; data not shown).

After co-culture, we observed a significant effect of the presence of both CAF and NTF in HCC cell lines. In the presence of the CAF, the up-regulations of TGFB1 and FAP were observed in both HCC cell lines (p < 0.05), a slight up-regulation of ACTA2 was observed in HuH-7. On the other hand, the presence of HuH-7 cells increased the expressions of ACTA2 and COL1 in CAF, while JHH-6 cells did not (Figure 3A).
Figure 3

Co-culture study between the primary cells and the HCC cell lines HuH-7 and JHH-6. A. Cross-talk between the HCC cells lines and the CAF. B. Cross-talk between the HCC cells lines and the NTF. Target mRNA expression was normalized to reference genes RNA18S and ACTB. CTRL = cells control without co-culture (=1.00). Target mRNA expressions were normalized to reference genes 18SRNA and ACTB. *p < 0.05 compared to each control.

In contrast, we noticed clear decrease of tumor supporting genes in HCC cells upon co-culture with the NTF with the exception of the increases of FAP and VIM in JHH-6. The mRNA expressions of CTGF, COL1, E-cadherin (CDH1), and N-cadherin (CDH2) were down-regulated in both HCC cell lines, while TGFB1 (p < 0.05), ACTA2, and integrin β1 (CD29) were down-regulated in HuH-7. In parallel, the presence of HCC cells up-regulated the expressions of CTGF (p < 0.05), VIM, COL1, and CD29 of the NTF. The expressions of TGFB1, CDH1, and CDH2 of the NTF were up-regulated after co-culture with JHH-6, a poor-differentiated HCC cell line (Figure 3B).

Xenograft assay

Two CAFs were subjected to xenograft assay. The viability of the cells was more than 95%. Four months after subcutaneous injection in nude mice, the serum level of ALT and AST of xenografts were slightly increased compared to control (102 ± 23 IU vs. 77 ± 9 IU for ALT and 23 ± 2 IU vs. 17 ± 1 IU for AST) even though no tumor nodules were observed. Orthotopic injection in NOD/SCID mice resulted in the appearance of nodules in the liver as well as in the lung and thymus. Cultured primary cells of the nodules and the injected sites expressed liver-specific markers ALB and AFP, including those of human, as confirmed by DNA sequencing with reference to DNA sequences of the CAF (Figure 4). However, we could not notice the human CD90 protein. The positivity of human and murine genes of xenograft models is listed on Table 2. No difference in body weight of all animals was noticed (data not shown).
Figure 4

Xenograft assay of the CAF. A. Tissue mass in the liver and lung of the NOD/SCID mouse following orthotopic injection of the CAF from HCC. Arrow indicates nodules. B. Primary cells of the nodules in the orthotopic xenografts. Scale bar, 100 μm. C. The positivity of genes in the xenograft primary cells. H = hepatic, L = lung, C + H = positive control human (human liver), C + M = positive control mouse (mouse liver). Gene 18S is homolog for human and mouse species. D. DNA sequencing of human AFP of primary cells obtained from the lung of xenograft. REF_AFP = DNA sequences of AFP genes from injected CAF, XG_AFP = DNA sequences of AFP genes from primary cultures of xenograft, NM_001134.1 = reference DNA sequences from GenBank.

Table 2

The positive expression of human and mouse genes of the xenograft tissues

Strain

Injection site

n

Nodule

Human genes +

Mouse genes +

Nude mice

Subcutaneous

3

N/D

ALB, AFP, Actin, 18S

Afp, Actin, Gapdh, 18S

NOD/SCID mice

Intrahepatic

2

liver and lung

ALB, AFP, Actin, 18S

Afp, Alb, Actin, Gapdh, 18S

Human and mouse genes positivity were detected using RT-PCR on xenograft tissues. Species specificity was checked using BLAST of NCBI. N/D: not detectable.

Discussion

We report on the presence of CAF and NTF populations with the characteristic of MSC in human hepatic tissues obtained from HCC patients. The CAF and NTF were negative or low expressed for the markers of endothelial (CD31) and hematopoietic cells (CD34, CD45). They had spindle-shape fibroblast-like morphology with the capacity to form colonies on plastic surface, and for CAF in three-dimensional matrix, indicating its anchorage-independent capacity and clonogenicity. The morphologic and phenotypic characteristics of the cells were maintained during subcultures.

Previously, Herrera et al. reported the isolation of the multipotent hepatic liver stem cells (HLSC) from normal human liver expressing MSC markers, vimentin, and nestin. They could be differentiated not only into mesodermal lineages, but also into endodermal lineage [12]. In this work, we induced both CAF and NTF into mesodermal lineage (adipocytes and osteoblasts) and endodermal lineage (pancreatic cells). After adipogenic induction, lipid deposition in cytoplasm was clearly noticeable, accompanied by the up-regulation of PPARG, a master regulator of adipocyte differentiation, in the NTF. After osteogenic induction, the cells were positive for alkaline phosphatase staining as well as the up-regulations of bone-specific genes. Our data is in line with a previous study by Cesselli et al. that the multipotent adult stem cells from diseased liver cultured in osteogenic medium became positive to von Kossa staining specific for bone differentiation and expressed osteocalcin [6].

To investigate whether the cells can be differentiated into not only similar mesenchymal lineage but also more advanced into endodermal lineage, we induced the cells into pancreatic cells. After induction, we observed the induction of SST, markers for δ cell, and the up-regulation of GIP, a member of glucagon, marker of α cell. However, the expression of insulin, a marker for β cells of pancreatic islet, was either absent of too low to be detected, at least at mRNA level. One possible explanation is that these cells were derived from cirrhotic and HCC tissues and their multipotent capacity might be more restricted compared to that of normal HLSC. Both phenotype and capacity of these cells are in agreement with the consensus of the Mesenchymal and Tissue Stem Cell Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy [14,15]. In particular, they showed plastic adherence in standard culture condition, expression of CD105 and CD90, but not CD45 and CD34, and the potency to differentiate into mesenchymal lineage in vitro.

From the trans-differentiation data, we found that both CAF and NTF had comparable potential to be induced into various cell types, even though the plasticity of the NTF was higher than the CAF. To understand their intrinsic difference in hepatocarcinogenesis, we performed a co-culture experiment with HCC cell lines with different degrees of differentiation, in a Transwell system. We observed that the presence of the CAF increased the expression of several genes involved in tumorigenesis in HCC cells. The expression of TGFB1 was increased, particularly in HuH-7, and a very strong up-regulation was observed for the FAP in both HCC cell lines.

In contrast, the up-regulation effect of HCC cells was apparent in the NTF, while the presence of the NTF down-regulated the factors of HCC. The presence of HCC cells induced a significant up-regulation of CTGF, as well as VIM, COL1, CDH2, and CD29, markers for mesenchymal phenotypes. This result was in accordance with previous data observed by Mazzocca et al. that HCC invasive cells produced high level of CTGF and they generated tumors with high stromal component in vivo [4]. The up-regulation ACTA2 of the NTF in the presence of HuH-7 is also in agreement with the previous report on the trans-differentiation of the PTF into CAF-myofibroblast in the presence of conditioned medium of HuH-7, even though in our experimental set we did not add the LPA [5]. In this study, the extent of the mRNA expressions in the NTF was higher in the presence of the poor-differentiated HCC cells JHH-6 compared to well-differentiated HuH-7 cells. These data support our conclusion on the mutual cross talk of the CAF, the NTF, and the cancer cells.

Yang et al. had demonstrated that CD90 cells isolated from primary HCC induced tumor and lung metastasis after orthotopic injection to SCID/Beige mice, indicating the CD90+ cells as a marker of cancer stem cells (CSC) [16]. Our in vivo data showed that subcutaneous injection of the CAF expressed CD90+ failed to induce tumor in nude mice four months after injection. However, orthotopic injection in the liver of NOD/SCID mouse induced mass in the liver and the lung. Interestingly, we noticed the presences of human ALB and AFP in the primary cells obtained from the lung mass. We assumed that the CAF were able to enter into circulation and interact with resident tissue environment, this indirectly supported our co-culture data in vitro. However, we did not found cells positive for human CD90 and CD44 in both liver and lung tissue. Therefore, although this initial in vivo data is important, further studies must be conducted to prove this interaction.

The negativity of human HCC after injection might indicate either different function of CD90 cells population in HCC or the presence of several different populations of CD90 phenotype. We had recently reported that the CD90 was up-regulated in liver cirrhosis and HCC compared to normal tissue [17] and data from Yamashita et al. had shown that the tumorigenicity of the CSC CD90+ cells might appear in the late stages of hepatocarcinogenesis with the preference to HBV-related HCC [18]. In our study, none of our CAF was derived from HBV-related HCC and the tissues were obtained from early stage of the disease undergoing partial hepatectomy. It is possible that it might be one of the reasons of this discrepancy, even though we are not in the position to demonstrate this point further.

Although the origin of CAF in HCC is still controversial, our result showed that CAF was able to differentiate into other cell types and to circulate to other organs, one of the characteristics of mesenchymal or stromal stem cells. On the other hand, CAF could be also derived upon a paracrine mechanism between multipotent NTF and HCC cells. Further studies will be essential to demonstrate the plasticity and mobility of resident fibroblasts in normal liver as well as in the progression of liver disease.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our data provides clear evidence of the plasticity of the stem cells-like CAF and NTF isolated from HCC and liver cirrhosis in the process of hepatocarcinogenesis and metastasis. These cells mutually interact with HCC cells and deregulate important tumor promoting factors. Their trans-differentiation flexibility may induce a switch from normal to cancerous microenvironment.

Abbreviations

ACTA2: 

Alpha smooth muscle actin

ALT: 

Alanin transferase

AST: 

Aspartate transferase

BGLAP: 

Osteocalcin, bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein

CAF: 

Cancer associated fibroblast

CD: 

Cluster of differentiation

COL1: 

Collagen type 1

CSC: 

Cancer stem cells

CTGF: 

Connective tissue growth factor

CTRL: 

Control

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic acid

GIP: 

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide

HBV: 

Hepatitis B virus

HCC: 

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV: 

Hepatitis C virus

IBSP: 

Bone sialoprotein

mRNA: 

Messenger ribonucleic acid

MSC: 

Mesenchymal stem cells

NTF: 

Non-tumoral fibroblast

ON: 

Osteonectin

OP: 

Osteopontin

OPG: 

Osteoprotegerin

PLC: 

Primary liver cancer

PPARG: 

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

RNA: 

Ribonucleic acid

RTqPCR: 

Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction

SC: 

Stem cells

SST: 

Somatostatin

TGFB: 

Transforming growth factor beta

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. N. De Manzini, A. Adami, M. Giuricin, P. Tarchi, and G. Stanta for their help in the collecting of samples. We also thank Dr. A. Beltrami and Prof. D. Muljono for their input in the thesis of CHCS. We acknowledge Dr. M. Bestagno of the ICGEB Trieste for the flow cytometry facility, Drs. N. Rosso and C. Coda-Zabetta for αSMA and Vimentin antibodies.

CHCS was supported by fellowships of the Italian Ministero degli Affari Esteri, Fondazione Umberto Veronesi, and Fondazione Aldo Duca. This work was funded by an internal grant from the Italian Liver Foundation and supported by the project 297 Nutrizione e Salute (2012–2014) ‘Dalla nutrigenetica alla nutraceutical’ of the Italian Ministro dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (Art. 13 D.LGS 297/99).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
(2)
Fondazione Italiana Fegato - Italian Liver Foundation, Trieste, Italy

References

  1. Bray F, Ren J-S, Masuyer E, Ferlay J. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:1133–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2557–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fransvea E, Mazzocca A, Antonaci S, Giannelli G. Targeting transforming growth factor (TGF)-betaRI inhibits activation of beta1 integrin and blocks vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2009;49:839–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mazzocca A, Fransvea E, Dituri F, Lupo L, Antonaci S, Giannelli G. Down-regulation of connective tissue growth factor by inhibition of transforming growth factor beta blocks the tumor-stroma cross-talk and tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2010;51:523–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mazzocca A, Dituri F, Lupo L, Quaranta M, Antonaci S, Giannelli G. Tumor-secreted lysophostatidic acid accelerates hepatocellular carcinoma progression by promoting differentiation of peritumoral fibroblasts in myofibroblasts. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2011;54:920–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cesselli D, Beltrami AP, Poz A, Marzinotto S, Comisso E, Bergamin N, et al. Role of tumor associated fibroblasts in human liver regeneration, cirrhosis, and cancer. Int J Hepatol. 2011;2011:120925.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55:611–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:e45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Tichopad A, Didier A, Pfaffl MW. Inhibition of real-time RT-PCR quantification due to tissue-specific contaminants. Mol Cell Probes. 2004;18:45–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma S, Chan K-W, Hu L, Lee TK-W, Wo JY-H, Ng IO-L, et al. Identification and characterization of tumorigenic liver cancer stem/progenitor cells. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2542–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Suetsugu A, Nagaki M, Aoki H, Motohashi T, Kunisada T, Moriwaki H. Characterization of CD133+ hepatocellular carcinoma cells as cancer stem/progenitor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;351:820–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrera MB, Bruno S, Buttiglieri S, Tetta C, Gatti S, Deregibus MC, et al. Isolation and characterization of a stem cell population from adult human liver. Stem Cells Dayt Ohio. 2006;24:2840–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang L, Li S, Hatch H, Ahrens K, Cornelius JG, Petersen BE, et al. In vitro trans-differentiation of adult hepatic stem cells into pancreatic endocrine hormone-producing cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:8078–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Horwitz EM, Le Blanc K, Dominici M, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, et al. International society for cellular therapy: clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: the international society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2005;7:393–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang ZF, Ho DW, Ng MN, Lau CK, Yu WC, Ngai P, et al. Significance of CD90+ cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:153–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sukowati CHC, Anfuso B, Torre G, Francalanci P, Crocè LS, Tiribelli C. The expression of CD90/Thy-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: an in vivo and in vitro study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76830.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Yamashita T, Honda M, Nakamoto Y, Baba M, Nio K, Hara Y, et al. Discrete nature of EpCAM+ and CD90+ cancer stem cells in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2013;57:1484–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sukowati et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement