- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Biological characterization of two xenografts derived from human CUPs (carcinomas of unknown primary)
© Lequin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 27 September 2007
- Accepted: 18 December 2007
- Published: 18 December 2007
Carcinomas of unknown primary site (CUP) are epithelial malignancies revealed by metastatic lesions in the absence of any detectable primary tumor. Although they often adopt an aggressive clinical pattern, their basic biology remains poorly understood. Laboratory research on their biology have been hampered so far by the absence of cell lines representative of CUPs.
We attempted xenografts of CUP clinical specimens in immunodeficient mice and subsequent in vitro culture of transplanted malignant cells. Whenever possible, malignant xenografted or cultured cells were characterized by microsatellite genotyping, immunohistology, electron microscopy, multifish chromosome analysis and search of TP 53 gene mutations.
Successful xenografts were achieved in 2 cases out of 4. One of them (Capi1) was lost after 3 passages whereas the other one (Capi3) has been adapted to in vitro culture and is currently available to the scientific community with reliable identification based on microsatellite genotyping. Both Capi1 and Capi3 have histological characteristics of adenocarcinomas and display intense expression of EMA, CEA and cytokeratin 7. Multifish chromosome analysis demonstrated a translocation involving chromosomes 4 and 21 in both specimens. Distinct rare missense mutations of the TP53 gene were detected in Capi1 (codon 312) and Capi3 (codon 181); the codon 181 mutation is consistent with a previously reported similar finding in a small series of CUP specimens. Finally, intense membrane expression of c-kit was recorded in Capi3.
Our data suggest that xenografted tumors can be obtained from a substantial fraction of CUP clinical specimens. The hypothesis of a preferential association of CUPs with TP 53 mutations of codon 181 deserves further investigations. The Capi3 cell line will be a useful tool for assessment of novel c-kit inhibitors.
- Mucinous Adenocarcinoma
- Denature High Performance Liquid Chromatography
- Unknown Primary Site
- Capi3 Material
- Capi3 Cell Line
The pathogenesis of the carcinomas of unknown primary site (CUPs) remains one of the most enigmatic topics in the field of metastasis research [1, 2]. They are defined as biopsy proven metastases of a malignancy in the absence of an identifiable primary site after clinical examination, radiological imaging and biological workup. Although there is no consensus about their incidence, it is reasonable to estimate that CUPs account for 2–3 % of all newly diagnosed patients with cancer [2, 3]. In all described series, this disease appears to be extremely aggressive with a median survival below 9 months . Biological mechanisms underlying the CUP phenomenon remain almost entirely unknown. With regard to histological characteristics, they are predominantly classified as adenocarcinomas (50–70%) or poorly differentiated carcinomas (20–30%). Only 5–8% are squamous cell carcinomas . Though CUPs comprise a heterogeneous group of tumours with widely varying natural histories, the clinical picture of CUP demonstrates common characteristics. Patients predominantly present with a short history of non-specific complaints (anorexia, weight loss, etc...). The primary tumor remains unidentified in most cases throughout the patient's life . The pattern of metastatic spread tends to be different in CUPs compared to metastasized known primary tumors. Approximately 30% of patients with CUP present with three or more organs involved in contrast with less than 15% in classical metastatic syndromes [4–6]. With the exception of some treatable subgroups – for example young men with extra-gonadal germ cell tumors – patients with CUP have a very poor prognosis [7, 8]. In some recent, mostly phase II studies with patients selected from poor prognostic groups, a median survival of 8–13 months was reached [9, 10].
Despite these intriguing characteristics and the severity of the prognosis, biology of CUPs has been poorly investigated. Surprisingly, there are only few in vitro cell lines representative of this category of tumors. To our knowledge, only one such cell line is available in the American Type Culture Collection but it is uncharacterized (CRL-7431). It is worth noting that none of the NCI-60 cell line panel used for systematic in vitro screening of anti-cancer compounds at the National Cancer Institute (Developmental Therapeutics Program) is derived from a CUP . In order to obtain biological material required for biological and pharmacological investigations of CUPs, we attempted to create xenografted tumor lines derived from fresh clinical specimens (biopsies or surgical specimens). Successful xenografts were achieved in 2 cases out of 4. One of them (Capi1) was lost after only 2 passages whereas the other one (Capi3) has been adapted to in vitro culture and is available to the scientific community. We here report biological characteristics of Capi3 along with some data on Capi1. Rare mutations of the TP53 gene were recorded for both Capi1 (exon 5) and Capi3 (exon 9).
Tumor transplantation in immunodeficient mice
Fragments of tumor biopsies or surgical specimens were obtained with signed informed consent from 4 patients and grafted on irradiated Swiss nude (5 Gy) and/or NOD-SCID mice. Two to six tumor fragments of about 4 mm3 were implanted subcutaneously in the recipient animals.
A xenografted Capi3 tumor was collected and minced in small pieces in order to favor the release of tumor cells in monocellular suspension or under the form of small clumps. This cell suspension was seeded in RPMI supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum in 6-well plates coated with the PX004 extra-cellular matrix (AbCys, Paris, France). This matrix is produced by a human malignant epithelial cell line . Contamination by murine fibroblasts was reduced by short applications of trypsin-EDTA taking advantage of stronger adherence of malignant epithelial cells to the culture support.
For fingerprint experiments, DNA has been isolated from cell pellets using the DNeasy tissue kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Microsatellite genotypes have been established using twelve highly polymorphic dinucleotide microsatellite markers covering six different chromosome arms (5q, 8p, 17p, 17q, 18p, 18q). The sequences of the primers are from the Ensembl Genome System website . PCR were carried out in 20 μL using 0.2 mmol/L dNTP, 0.5U HotStarTaq polymerase (QIAGEN), and sense primers labelled with 6-FAM (D5S107, D8S1731, D17S796, D17S1824, D18S53), HEX (D17S1353, D17S1791, D17S1873, D17S250, D18S1132) or NED (D8S261, D18S1127). After a 15-min step at 95°C, 35 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 30 sec at 55°C and 30 sec at 72°C, followed by a 6-min final extension at 72°C, were performed. PCR products were diluted in formamide containing ROX-labelled 400 HD size markers (PE Applied Biosystems) and electrophoresed in 50-cm capillaries containing POP-6 on an ABI PRISM® 3100 Genetic Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems). The apparent sizes of the alleles were analyzed using the GeneScan Analysis 3.1 software (PE Applied Biosystems).
Tissue fragments were paraffin-embedded after fixation in 4% formol-PBS. Tissue sections were stained with antibodies directed to EMA (Epithelial Membranous Antigen, E29 MoAb, Dako), CEA (carcino-embryonic antigen, polyclonal, Dako), CK7 (OV-TL12.30 MoAb, Dako), CK20 (K020.8 MoAb, Dako), TTF1 (8G763/1 MoAb, Dako), EGF-R (clone 3C6, Ventana) and c-kit (D117 MoAb, Dako).
Electron microscopy imaging
Cell pellets were fixed with 1.6 % glutaraldehyde at 4°C, followed by treatment with osmium tetroxide, then dehydrated and embedded in epon resin. Ultrathin sections were cut on an LKB-III ultra-microtome, stained for contrast with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined with a Zeiss EM 902 transmission electron microscope.
Metaphase chromosome spreads were obtained using classical procedures, and standard karyotypic analyzes were performed after RHG banding and were classified according to ISCN classification . FISH analysis was performed using 24 color multifish Vysis probes according to manufacturer's instructions (Vysis Downers Grove, Illinois, USA).
Detection of TP53gene mutations
Total DNA was extracted from xenografted tumor pieces. Exons 5 to 9 were amplified by PCR in three segments and analyzed by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) followed by direct sequencing of regions generating abnormal chromatograms . Corresponding PCR products were reamplified using nested primers and sequenced.
Characteristics of donor patients
Characteristics of donor patients and outcome of mouse transplantation
Site of tumor biopsy
Outcome of xenotransplantation
poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma
squamous cell carcinoma
Outcome of xenotransplantations and establishment of the Capi3 cell line
As shown in Table 1, mouse transplantation was successful in 2 cases out of four, resulting in the growth of the Capi1 (patient 1) and Capi3 (patient 4) xenografts. Capi1 was lost after 2 passages. However, it was possible to save frozen pieces of xenografted tumors. Capi3 xenografted tumor pieces were collected at passage 2 and tumor cells were released in vitro by mechanical dissociation. Dispersed tumor cells were then seeded for in vitro cultures as reported in the Methods section. Cell attachment was readily obtained on PX004 extra-cellular matrix, allowing slow growth of human epithelial cells mixed with murine fibroblasts. Beyond passage 5, it was possible to grow these cells on non-coated ordinary plastic vessels. Subsequently a progressive increase in cell growth was observed. At passage 20, doubling time stabilized at 4 days.
Microsatellite genotyping at the successive stages of Capi3 establishment
Histology, immuno-phenotyping and ultrastructure
Immunohistological phenotyping of xenografted CUPs and corresponding clinical specimens
Capi1 clinical specimen
Capi3 clinical specimen
Very complex karyotypes were obtained in both tumor lines.
Capi1 was 59–60, XX, add(2)(q14), der(4)t(4;21)(pter->q28-q31::q24->q28-q32;q11), add(5)(p15), +6, +7 × 2, +8 × 2, -9 × 2, +11, +15, der(16)dup(16)(p12p13?, q22q23?), +der(17), +der(19), +der(20)(p11qter), -21, +mar cps.
It is noteworthy that a t(4;21) and a loss of both chromosomes 9 were observed in the two cell lines.
TP53gene status in Capi1 and Capi3
In Capi1, a C to G transversion was found at nucleotide 14696 of the TP53 locus (accession number X54156 in Genbank), in exon 9, resulting in a change of a threonine into a serine at codon 312. In Capi3, a G to C transversion was found at nucleotide 13221, in exon 5, resulting in a change of an arginine into a proline at codon 181.
In this study xenografting was successful for 2 out of 4 CUP specimens. This suggests that there is no real biological hindrance opposing successful grafting of CUP cells on immunodeficient mice. If CUP xenografts and cell lines remain so rare, it is probably due to a lack of deliberate efforts to obtain, preserve and spread this type of biological resource.
Regarding CK20 and TTF1 expression in Capi3, some differences were recorded between the surgical tumor specimen and the corresponding xenograft. Thanks to microsatellite analysis, we can rule out errors in tumor tracking and state positively that these differences reflect a genuine biological process, for example a selection of malignant cells more prone to grow in the murine microenvironment or a direct influence of this microenvironment on gene expression profile as reported in other models [16, 17]. The same factors probably underlie the changes in EGF-R expression which is absent in the Capi1 xenograft while it was abundant in the corresponding clinical specimen.
The karyotypes of both cell lines exhibited very complex chromosomal rearrangements. This is consistent with a previous report by Pantou et al. which has shown that most CUPs – although not all of them – are associated with massive structural alterations of chromosomes . Additional investigations such as high resolution array CGH will be required to better understand those complex rearrangements. One important aim will be to elucidate the t(4;21) translocation observed in both Capi1 and Capi3. So far t(4, 21) translocations have been exclusively reported in hematological malignancies according to the "Mitelman database of chromosome aberrations in cancer", especially in myeloid leukemias .
There has been only one previous study on TP 53 mutations in CUPs which analyzed exons 5 to 9 in 23 CUP specimens and found only 6 tumors with mutations (26%); a frequency which was lower than expected for this aggressive type of epithelial malignancy. One of the 6 positive specimens had a mutation at nucleotide 13 221 (Bar-Eli et al., 1993). In our own study, the same nucleotide was mutated in the Capi3 tumor. Both mutations resulted in a missense alteration at codon 181 : Arg to Leu (Bar-Eli et al.) and Arg to Pro (Capi3) respectively. Mutations of codon 181 are relatively rare, accounting for only 59 cases out of 23 544 somatic mutations indexed in the IARC database (to be compared to 1130 mutations recorded for codon 175; for details see the "IARC TP 53 mutation data base", release R11, 2006) [21–23]. P53 amino-acid 181 is contained in the DNA-binding domain but has no direct contact with the DNA in contrast with residues identified as mutational hot spots. Nevertheless, functional studies have shown that both Leu181Arg and Pro181Arg mutations impair the transactivating functions of TP 53 [24, 25]. It would be interesting to investigate additional CUP specimens to know whether mutations of codon 181 occur at a relatively high frequency in this category of malignancies. A distinct TP 53 mutation was found at codon 312 (Thr to Ser) in the Capi1 xenograft. This codon accounts for only 13 cases of somatic mutations recorded in the IARC data base. The affected amino-acid is outside known functional domains. According to prediction models, this mutation is not expected to be deleterious (IARC TP 53 mutation data base, R11, 2006) [21–23]. No mutation of exon 9 have been reported in the previous study on TP 53 mutations in CUPs .
Intense membrane expression of c-kit was found in Capi3 cells in the xenografted tumor as well as in the surgical specimen. We and others have found that the c-kit protein is detected in about 10% of CUP specimens [2, 26]. Using the c-kit tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib mesylate, remarkable therapeutic results have been achieved in human malignancies overexpressing a mutated form of c-kit, especially GISTs. In contrast, this compound has only limited effects on malignancies expressing a non-mutated form of c-kit, for example small cell lung carcinomas . However a novel generation of c-kit inhibitors which are currently under investigation might be efficient on a larger spectrum of c-kit positive malignancies . From this perspective, the Capi3 cell line will probably be a useful target for in vitro assessment of these novel compounds.
This report will encourage other investigators to attempt establishment of CUP cell lines in order to broaden our possibilities of laboratory investigations. TP 53 mutations might be more frequent than initially suspected in this disease . The hypothesis of a preferential association of CUPs with mutations of codon 181 deserves further investigations. Finally, the Capi3 cell line will be a useful tool for assessment of novel c-kit inhibitors.
This study was sponsored by the GEFCAPI ("Groupe d'Etude Français des Carcinomes de Primitif Inconnu") and supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health (PHRC). We thank Françoise Drusch for technical assistance, Jean Bénard, Nadine Béron and the AbCys company for useful advice regarding the PX004 matrix, Françoise Thivolet-Béjui for helpful discussions.
- Busson PD-GL, Pavlidis N, van de Wouw J: The biology of Unknown Primary Tumors : the little we know, the importance of learning more. Carcinoma of an Unknown Primary Site. Edited by: Fizazi K. 2006, New-York – London: Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
- Pentheroudakis G, Briasoulis E, Pavlidis N: Cancer of unknown primary site: missing primary or missing biology?. Oncologist. 2007, 12: 418-425. 10.1634/theoncologist.12-4-418.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van de Wouw AJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Coebergh JW, Hillen HF: Epidemiology of unknown primary tumours; incidence and population-based survival of 1285 patients in Southeast Netherlands, 1984–1992. Eur J Cancer. 2002, 38: 409-413. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00378-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van de Wouw AJ, Jansen RL, Griffioen AW, Hillen HF: Clinical and immunohistochemical analysis of patients with unknown primary tumour. A search for prognostic factors in UPT. Anticancer Res. 2004, 24: 297-301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abrams HL, Spiro R, Goldstein N: Metastases in carcinoma; analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer. 1950, 3: 74-85. 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<74::AID-CNCR2820030111>3.0.CO;2-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pentheroudakis G, Golfinopoulos V, Pavlidis N: Switching benchmarks in cancer of unknown primary: From autopsy to microarray. Eur J Cancer. 2007Google Scholar
- Summersgill B, Goker H, Osin P, Huddart R, Horwich A, Fisher C, Shipley J: Establishing germ cell origin of undifferentiated tumors by identifying gain of 12p material using comparative genomic hybridization analysis of paraffin-embedded samples. Diagn Mol Pathol. 1998, 7: 260-266. 10.1097/00019606-199810000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Culine S, Kramar A, Saghatchian M, Bugat R, Lesimple T, Lortholary A, Merrouche Y, Laplanche A, Fizazi K: Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict the length of survival in patients with carcinomas of an unknown primary site. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 4679-4683. 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Culine S, Lortholary A, Voigt JJ, Bugat R, Theodore C, Priou F, Kaminsky MC, Lesimple T, Pivot X, Coudert B, et al: Cisplatin in combination with either gemcitabine or irinotecan in carcinomas of unknown primary site: results of a randomized phase II study – trial for the French Study Group on Carcinomas of Unknown Primary (GEFCAPI 01). J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21: 3479-3482. 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Briasoulis E, Kalofonos H, Bafaloukos D, Samantas E, Fountzilas G, Xiros N, Skarlos D, Christodoulou C, Kosmidis P, Pavlidis N: Carboplatin plus paclitaxel in unknown primary carcinoma: a phase II Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18: 3101-3107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- DTPwebsite. [http://dtp.nci.nih.gov]
- Maubant S, Cruet-Hennequart S, Poulain L, Carreiras F, Sichel F, Luis J, Staedel C, Gauduchon P: Altered adhesion properties and alpha V integrin expression in a cisplatin-resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell line. Int J Cancer. 2002, 97: 186-194. 10.1002/ijc.1600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ensembl. [http://www.ensembl.org]
- Shaffer LG, Tommerup N, Karger S: An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. 2005, Basel: Karger SGoogle Scholar
- Le Calvez F, Ahman A, Tonisson N, Lambert J, Temam S, Brennan P, Zaridze DG, Metspalu A, Hainaut P: Arrayed primer extension resequencing of mutations in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene: comparison with denaturing HPLC and direct sequencing. Clin Chem. 2005, 51: 1284-1287. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.048348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Creighton CJ, Bromberg-White JL, Misek DE, Monsma DJ, Brichory F, Kuick R, Giordano TJ, Gao W, Omenn GS, Webb CP, Hanash SM: Analysis of tumor-host interactions by gene expression profiling of lung adenocarcinoma xenografts identifies genes involved in tumor formation. Mol Cancer Res. 2005, 3: 119-129. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-04-0189.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura T, Fidler IJ, Coombes KR: Gene expression profile of metastatic human pancreatic cancer cells depends on the organ microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 139-148. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2563.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pantou D, Tsarouha H, Papadopoulou A, Mahaira L, Kyriazoglou I, Apostolikas N, Markidou S, Trangas T, Pandis N, Bardi G: Cytogenetic profile of unknown primary tumors: clues for their pathogenesis and clinical management. Neoplasia. 2003, 5: 23-31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mitelman F, Johansson B, Mertens F: [http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman]
- Bar-Eli M, Abbruzzese JL, Lee-Jackson D, Frost P: p53 gene mutation spectrum in human unknown primary tumors. Anticancer Res. 1993, 13: 1619-1623.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- IARC: [http://www-p53.iarc.fr]
- Olivier M, Eeles R, Hollstein M, Khan MA, Harris CC, Hainaut P: The IARC TP53 database: new online mutation analysis and recommendations to users. Hum Mutat. 2002, 19: 607-614. 10.1002/humu.10081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petitjean A, Mathe E, Kato S, Ishioka C, Tavtigian SV, Hainaut P, Olivier M: Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database. Hum Mutat. 2007, 28: 622-629. 10.1002/humu.20495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marutani M, Tonoki H, Tada M, Takahashi M, Kashiwazaki H, Hida Y, Hamada J, Asaka M, Moriuchi T: Dominant-negative mutations of the tumor suppressor p53 relating to early onset of glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 4765-4769.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ludwig RL, Bates S, Vousden KH: Differential activation of target cellular promoters by p53 mutants with impaired apoptotic function. Mol Cell Biol. 1996, 16: 4952-4960.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Massard C, Voigt JJ, Laplanche A, Culine S, Lortholary A, Bugat R, Theodore C, Priou F, Kaminsky MC, Lesimple T, et al: Carcinoma of an unknown primary: are EGF receptor, Her-2/neu, and c-Kit tyrosine kinases potential targets for therapy?. Br J Cancer. 2007Google Scholar
- Fischer B, Marinov M, Arcaro A: Targeting receptor tyrosine kinase signalling in small cell lung cancer (SCLC): what have we learned so far?. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007, 33: 391-406. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chow LQ, Eckhardt SG: Sunitinib: from rational design to clinical efficacy. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 884-896. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.3602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/7/225/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.