Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

An association of a simultaneous nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of Fra-1 with breast malignancy

BMC Cancer volume 6, Article number: 298 (2006) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Overexpression of Fra-1 in fibroblasts causes anchorage-independent cell growth and oncogenic transformation. A high level of Fra-1 expression is found in various tumors and tumorigenic cell lines, suggesting that Fra-1 may be involved in malignant progression. This study aimed to investigate the significance of Fra-1 expression in breast carcinogenesis.

Methods

The expression of Fra-1 was investigated by immunohistochemistry in neoplastic breast diseases ranging from benign fibroadenoma to very aggressive undifferentiated carcinoma. The correlations of Fra-1 expression with other indicators of breast carcinoma prognosis (ER, PR and ErbB2 receptors) were analyzed.

Results

All neoplastic breast tissues, either benign or malignant breast tissues, were nuclear immunoreactive for Fra-1-recognizing antibody. The pattern of Fra-1 expression by benign neoplastic cells was predominantly nuclear. However, the nuclear/cytoplasmic concomitant immunoreactivity was observed in all types of breast carcinomas. A clear shift in Fra-1 immunoreactivity, from an exclusively nuclear to a simultaneous nuclear and cytoplasmic localization was noticed in ~90% of breast carcinomas.

Conclusion

The overall expression, pattern and intensity of Fra-1 proteins were correlated with breast oncogenesis. Overexpression of Fra-1, leading to a persistent high cytoplasmic accumulation, may play a role in the process of breast carcinogenesis.

Peer Review reports

Background

Transcription factor AP-1 (activator protein 1) is thought to play an important role in regulating the gene expression pattern in response to external stimuli [1–4]. It is composed of transcription factors belonging to Jun and Fos families [5, 6]. In mammalian cells, three members of the Jun family (c-Jun, JunB, and JunD) and four members of the Fos family (c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, Fra-2) have been identified to date. These two family members can form Jun/Jun homodimers or more stable Fos/Jun heterodimers, which bind to the palindromic TGA(C/G)TCA recognition sequence, so-called 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) response element (TRE) and activate the gene transcription [7–9]. Since TRE-containing promoter constructs were strongly activated by the tumor promoter TPA and AP-1 proteins (c-Jun and c-Fos) [10], the AP-1 complex was implicated in carcinogenesis soon after discovery.

In eukaryotic cells, extracellular stimuli cause a series of intracellular signals that ultimately activate the proteins binding to transcriptional control elements, selectively regulating gene expression. Fos and Jun family members participate at the end of signal transduction pathways [11–14]. Stimulation with various growth factors and activated oncogenes results in immediate transcriptional activation of the c-Fos gene, accompanied with transient overexpression of c-Fos protein and formation of c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers [15–17]. Whereas, Fra-1 expression is delayed and more stable. In exponentially growing cells, Fra-1 protein is hyperphosphorylated and its expression elevated [18].

All AP-1 proteins are characterized by a basic leucine-zipper region. As the transcription factors, c-Fos and FosB proteins harbor a C-terminal transactivation domain, but Fra-1 and Fra-2 lack this region [19, 20]. Since Fra-1 and Fra-2 were shown to inhibit c-Fos- and c-Jun-dependent transactivation in a transient-transfection assay, it has been proposed that these proteins act as negative regulators, which limit the duration of the AP-1 response [21]. However, emerging evidence suggests an important role for Fra-1 in cell motility, invasion, and progression of the transformed state in several cell types [22–24]. The recent data indicated that overexpressed Fra-1 in fibroblasts causes anchorage-independent growth and oncogenic transformation [10, 25]. A high level of Fra-1 expression is found in some tumors and tumorigenic cell lines [26–30]. These results suggested that Fra-1 might be involved in malignant progression. However, few reports deal with the expression and location of Fra-1 protein in human breast tumor tissues.

In this study, we conducted retrospective study using 61 paraffin-embedded breast tumor tissues to investigate Fra-1 expression by immunohistochemistry. The correlations of Fra-1 with estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and ErbB2 receptor status were analyzed in breast cancer patients in order to further explore the role of Fra-1 in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Methods

Collection of Breast Tissue Samples

A total of 61 breast tissue specimens constituted by fibroadenomas, hyperplastic adenosis/fibroadenomas, ductal carcinomas, lobular carcinomas and other breast carcinomas were collected at 307 Hospital (Beijing, China) from patients undergoing surgery (Table 1). All tumor tissue samples were fixed immediately after surgical removal in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin.

Table 1 Summarized patient data
Full size table

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded tissue was freshly cut (4 μm). The sections were dewaxed with xylene, and gradually hydrated in a decreasing ethanol series ending in distilled water. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched using 3% hydrogen peroxide in distilled water for 5–10 minutes and then washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) before immunohistochemical staining. The Streptavidin-Biotin method was used to detect Fra-1 expression. Antigen retrieval was achieved using microwave heating in 1 mM EDTA (pH 9.0) at ~97°C for 20 minutes, followed by a 20 minute cooldown period at room temperature. The rabbit polyclonal antibody against the synthetic peptide derived from residues 128–180 of human Fra-1 (ab22837, Abcam Lid. UK) at a concentration of 5 μg/ml in PBS was applied for 60 minutes at 37°C or overnight at 4°C. The antibody is not able to detect the other members of Fos family. After washing with PBS, sections were incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit antibody (Zhongshan Co., Beijing, China) at 37°C for 15 minutes and washed in PBS. Then the streptavidin peroxidase reagent (Zhongshan Co., Beijing, China) was applied at 37°C for 15 minutes and sections were again washed in PBS. The color was developed by a 7-minute incubation with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution and the sections were weakly counterstained with hematoxylin, washed, dehydrated with alcohol and xylene and mounted with coverslips. Omission of the primary antibody and substitution by nonspecific immunoglobulin at the same concentration were used as negative controls. For ER, PR, and ErbB2 staining, sections were stained with the ER/PR/ErbB2 Immunohistochemistry Test Kit (Zhongshan Co., Beijing, China), which includes the mouse monoclonal antibodies against human ER, PR, and ErbB2 proteins.

Assessment of Fra-1, ER, PR and ErbB2 expression

Fra-1 expression is purely nuclear or mixed nuclear and cytoplasmic. Nuclear reactivity was scored as high (>75% cell positive) or low (<75% cell positive). Cytoplasmic reactivity, when present (positive) was scored as high (strong staining) and low (weak staining). The percentage of tumor cells showing nuclear or cytoplasmic Fra-1 reactivity was recorded semi-quantitatively at ×400 magnification after examining the entire histologic section. ER and PR staining was scored in a minimum of 300 histologically identified neoplastic cells, showing nuclear reaction. Tumors with positive ER or PR nuclear staining in >10% of tumor cells were defined as ER or PR positive, respectively. For ErbB2 protein, immunostainings were scored as strong (2++ and 3+++), weak or negative (0 and 1+) according to the rate of labelled tumor cells and the membrane staining intensity. The ErbB2 status was further classified as overexpressed including 2++ and 3+++ (positive) or not significantly expressed (negative).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using standard statistical software SPSS version 13.0 (Chicago, Illinois) as previously described. Fisher's Exact Test was used to determine the significance of the association of the different factors. Expression is defined as negative or positive staining and staining pattern is defined as nuclear or cytoplasmic staining. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The results of the immunohistochemical study of 61 breast tissues (10 fibroadenomas, 10 hyperplastic adenosis/fibroadenomas, 31 ductal carcinomas, 4 lobular carcinomas and 6 other types of breast carcinomas) are summarized in Table 2. No staining was observed in the absence of the primary antibodies or with nonspecific immunoglobulin (Fig. 1A). Nuclear expression of Fra-1 was detected in all neoplastic tissues. In 85% of benign tumors (17/20), the immunoreactivity for Fra-1-recognizing antibody was exclusively restricted to the nuclei. Fig. 1B shows that the nuclear immunoreactivity for Fra-1 was identified mostly in the epithelial cells. Generally, the nuclei of infiltrating inflammatory cells were not stained. Moreover, the nuclear staining was not observed in all of the epithelial cells. Fig. 1C and 1D shows the strong immunostaining in fibroadenomas. In some ducts lined with stratified epithelium, positive staining appeared largely on the apical epithelial layer on the luminal aspect as shown in Fig. 1D, but myoepithelial layer adjacent to the acinal basement membrane was mostly negative. However, the weak nuclear staining of some interlobular stroma cells was also visible. In most cases (85%), the immunoreactivity is present only in the nuclei. In three cases (15%), focal unequivocal cytoplasmic staining was also exhibited.

Table 2 Fra-1 expression in benign and malignant breast tissues by immunohistochemistry
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

The immunohistochemical staining of Fra-1 in benign breast tumors. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were prepared. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched using 3% hydrogen peroxide before immunohistochemical staining. The Streptavidin-Biotin method was used to detect Fra-1 expression. The rabbit anti-human Fra-1 polyclonal antibody at a concentration of 5 μg/ml in PBS was applied for 60 minutes at 37°C or overnight at 4°C. The sections were then incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit antibody at 37°C for 15 minutes. The streptavidin peroxidase reagent was applied at 37°C for 15 minutes. The color was developed by incubating with DAB solution. A, nonspecific immunoglobulin was used as a negative control. B, The nuclear immunoreactivity for Fra-1 was identified mostly in the epithelial cells of fibroadenomas. C, The strong nuclear immunostaining was present in fibroadenomas. D, Positive staining appeared largely on the apical epithelial layer on the luminal aspect, but myoepithelial layer was mostly negative. ×400 magnification.

Full size image

In contrast to fibroadenomas or hyperplastic adenosis/fibroadenomas, strong positive nuclear staining for Fra-1 was easily seen in all types of breast carcinomas, either diffuse (100% of the tumor cells positive) or focal (>75% of the tumor cells positive). Moreover, a variable degree of cytoplasmic staining was easily observed in ~90% breast carcinomas, although the immunoreactivity in cytoplasm was weaker than in nucleus. However, cytoplasmic localization of Fra-1 was rarely observed in adjacent peritumoural tissues. In normal epidermal tissues a weak immunoreactivity was only restricted to the nucleus of basal cell layer. In 56% of cases in breast carcinomas (23/41), weak cytoplasmic immunostaining was observed (Fig. 2A and 2B). It is noteworthy that in 34% cases (14/41), strong nuclear and cytoplasmic double staining was very pronounced (Fig. 2C and 2D).

Figure 2
figure 2

The immunohistochemical staining of Fra-1 in breast carcinomas. A and B, strong nuclear and weak cytoplastic immunostaining were observed in two representative invasive ductal carcinomas. C and D, Strong nuclear and cytoplasmic double staining was very pronounced in two representative invasive ductal carcinomas. E, nonspecific immunoglobulin was used as a negative control. ×400 magnification.

Full size image

The accumulation of Fra-1 protein and the changes occurring in its subcellular localization are illustrated in Figure 3A and 3B. Fra-1 protein immunostaining was usually weak in normal tissues or well-differentiated adjacent peritumoural tissues and positive reactivity restricted to the nucleus (Figure 3A). Whereas in poorer differentiated region in the same section the expression of Fra-1 protein was present in the nucleus and cytoplasm simultaneously (Figure 3B). In addition, Fra-1 expression was observed in all types of breast carcinomas.

Figure 3
figure 3

The differential expression of Fra-1 protein in breast carcinomas. Fra-1 protein immunostaining was weak in adjacent peritumoural tissues and positive reactivity restricted to nuclear (A), but strong in poorer differentiated region in the same section and positive reactivity presented in nuclear and cytoplasmic simultaneously (B). ×400 magnification.

Full size image

The results provided in Table 3 showed an association between the cytoplasmic expression of Fra-1 and breast carcinoma. There was a significant relationship between the cytoplasmic expression of Fra-1 and breast carcinomas (P = 0.000). No inverse relationship between Fra-1 and ER and PR protein levels was noticed in malignant tumors (Table 4). The relative expression level of Fra-1 was not correlated with the expression of ErbB2.

Table 3 Correlation of Fra-1 cytoplasmic expression with benign and malignancy
Full size table
Table 4 Correlation of Fra-1 cytoplasmic expression with other prognostic factors
Full size table

Discussion

A large group of oncogenes encode transcription factors. The oncogenic transcription factors play critical role in contributing to malignancy by altering programs of cell growth, differentiation and development. Activation of AP-1 has been implicated in the fundamental processes occurring in mammalian cells. Promoters and enhancers of many genes, whose expression is affected in cancer development, bear TRE capable of binding the Fos and Jun transcription factors. Recent reports have underlined a crucial role of Fra-1 in the transformation of several cell lines. For example, ectopic expression of Fra-1 in rat fibroblast cells induced tumorigenicity [25]. Fra-1 gene induction was required for establishment of the neoplastic phenotype in retrovirally transformed rat thyroid cells [31]. The overexpression of Fra-1 protein had also been described in a variety of epithelial neoplasias, including thyroid cancer [27], esophageal squamous carcinoma [32], endometrial cancer [33] and prostate cancer [34] A tight association of Fra-1 expression with highly invasive breast cancer cell lines has been demonstrated. Fra-1 was efficient for stimulating MMP-9, MMP-1, VEGF and cyclin D1 production in MCF7 cells [23] and could induce the expression of osteopontin (OPN), thrombospondin and CD44 [35], suggesting that Fra-1 might influence cell proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis. The effects of Fra-1 on motility and invasion have been observed in four highly invasive and nine weakly invasive human breast cancer cell lines by cDNA array technology. Among 24 differentially expressed genes, Fra-1 expression level was significantly enhanced in the highly invasive cells. Similar results were found by cDNA array technology in 22 human mammary epithelial cell strains/lines (breast cancer cell lines and cells derived from primary or metastatic breast cancers and reduction mammoplasties) [26]. Some authors suggested that Fra-1 might be a valuable diagnostic marker in breast cancer.

Fra-1 Expression at both mRNA and protein levels in breast cancer tissues has been previously studied using Northern blot and Western blot [36, 37]. To further investigate the significance of Fra-1 in human breast cancer, the expression of Fra-1 was investigated in this study by immunohistochemistry with the anti-Fra-1 antibody in neoplastic breast diseases ranging from benign fibroadenoma to very aggressive undifferentiated carcinoma. The correlations of Fra-1 expression with other indicators of breast carcinoma prognosis (ER, PR and ErbB2 receptors) were analyzed. All neoplastic breast tissues, either benign or malignant breast tissues, were nuclear immunoreactive for Fra-1-recognizing antibody, whereas tumor adjacent normal tissues showed a much weaker nuclear immunoreactivity only restricted to some epithelial cells. The patterns of Fra-1 expression by benign neoplastic cells were predominantly nuclear. In only 3 of 20 cases of fibroadenomas or hyperplastic adenosis/fibroadenomas, nuclear expression coexisted with weak cytoplasmic reactivity. However, the nuclear/cytoplasmic concomitant immunoreactivity was observed in all types of breast carcinomas. A clear shift in Fra-1 immunoreactivity, from an exclusively nuclear to a simultaneous nuclear and cytoplasmic localization was noticed in ~90% of breast carcinomas. We can not exclude a slight increase in Fra-1 expression not detectable by immunohistochemistry. The data indicate that the expression pattern and intensity of Fra-1 proteins are correlated with epithelial cell oncogenesis.

A negative correlation of ER/PR and Fra-1 expression was observed in breast cancer cell lines. In breast cancer tissues, Fra-1 was found correlated with ER status in one study [37]. The high Fra-1 expression and phosphorylation in ER-negative cells appeared to take place only in culture conditions, since the phosphorylated bands were undetectable in clinical tumor tissue from both ER-positive and ER-negative carcinomas [37]. In another study, an inverse correlation of Fra-1 level with a progesterone receptor isoform PR-B expression was observed [38]. However, the correlations of Fra-1 expression with ER, PR and ErbB2 were not found in our study. The further investigation is still needed.

Fra-1 lacks a transcriptional transactivation domain and it is thought, in partnership with c-Jun, to drive the expression of genes [35]. Its overexpression results in the transcription of progression-associated genes and induction of epithelial mesenchymal transition [22, 25]. The recent evidence has indicated a potential role for Fra-1 in abnormal differentiation and transformation of lung cells [19, 39]. However, the role played by Fra-1 in malignancy remains unclear. It is known that many transcription factors shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm. The synthesis of Fra-1 is supposed to start in the cytoplasm. However when it was overexpressed, nuclear import might be hampered. Saturation of a nuclear import mechanism, leading to a persistent high cytoplasmic concentration of the proteins, may also play a role in the process of breast carcinogenesis.

The recent study showed that nuclear p21Cip1/WAF1 translocates to the cytoplasm and this translocation event is accompanied by resistance to various apoptotic stimuli [40]. The non-transcriptional mechanism of Fra-1 remains to be further demonstrated.

Conclusion

In summary, our data by immunohistochemical analysis of breast tissues, including benign and malignant breast carcinomas, reveal that Fra-1 protein accumulation in the cytoplasm may play an important role in human breast carcinogenesis. These data may highlight the significance of therapy based on the blockage of Fra-1 functions of breast cancers.

References

  1. Karin M: The regulation of AP-1 activity by mitogen-activated protein kinases. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 16483-16486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boulikas T: Phosphorylation of transcription factors and control of the cell cycle. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1995, 5: 1-77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Radler-Pohl A, Gebel S, Sachsenmaier C, Konig H, Kramer M, Oehler T: The activation and activity control of AP-1 (fos/jun). Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993, 684: 127-148. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb32277.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Angel P, Karin M: The role of Jun, Fos and the AP-1 complex in cell-proliferation and transformation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991, 1072: 129-157.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abate C, Curran T: Encounters with Fos and Jun on the road to AP-1. Semin Cancer Biol. 1990, 1: 19-26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Curran T, Franza BR: Fos and Jun: the AP-1 connection. Cell. 1988, 55: 395-397. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90024-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Satake M, Ibaraki T, Yamaguchi Y, Ito Y: Loss of responsiveness of an AP1-related factor, PEBP1, to 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate after transformation of NIH 3T3 cells by the Ha-ras oncogene. J Virol. 1989, 63: 3669-3677.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Welter JF, Crish JF, Agarwal C, Eckert RL: Fos-related antigen (Fra-1), junB, and junD activate human involucrin promoter transcription by binding to proximal and distal AP1 sites to mediate phorbol ester effects on promoter activity. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 12614-12622. 10.1074/jbc.270.21.12614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogram SA, Reeves R: Differential regulation of a multipromoter gene. Selective 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate induction of a single transcription start site in the HMG-I/Y gene. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 14235-14242. 10.1074/jbc.270.23.14235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mechta F, Lallemand D, Pfarr C, Yaniv M: Transformation by ras modifies AP1 composition and activity. Oncogene. 1997, 14: 837-847. 10.1038/sj.onc.1200900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kerr LD, Inoue J, Verma IM: Signal transduction: the nuclear target. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992, 4: 496-501. 10.1016/0955-0674(92)90017-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simonson MS, Wang Y, Dunn MJ: Cellular signaling by endothelin peptides: pathways to the nucleus. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992, 2: S116-S125.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Woodgett JR, Pulverer BJ, Plyte S, Hughes K, Nikolakaki E: Nuclear onco-protein targets of signal transduction pathways. Pigment Cell Res. 1994, 7: 96-100. 10.1111/j.1600-0749.1994.tb00027.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodgett JR, Avruch J, Kyriakis JM: Regulation of nuclear transcription factors by stress signals. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1995, 22: 281-283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haby C, Lisovoski F, Aunis D: Stimulation of the cyclic GMP pathway by NO induces expression of the immediate early genes c-fos and junB in PC12 cells. J Neurochem. 1994, 62: 496-501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whaley PD, Chaudhary J, Cupp A, Skinner MK: Role of specific response elements of the c-fos promoter and involvement of intermediate transcription factor(s) in the induction of Sertoli cell differentiation (transferrin promoter activation) by the testicular paracrine factor PModS. Endocrinology. 1995, 136: 3046-3053. 10.1210/en.136.7.3046.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson RE, Taylor SL, Atherton GT, Johnston D, Waters CM, Norton JD: Early response gene signalling cascades activated by ionising radiation in primary human B cells. Oncogene. 1993, 8: 3229-3237.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith LM, Wise SC, Hendricks DT, Sabichi AL, Bos T, Reddy P, Brown PH, Birrer MJ: cJun overexpression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells produces a tumorigenic, invasive and hormone resistant phenotype. Oncogene. 1999, 18: 6063-6070. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reddy SP, Mossman BT: Role and regulation of activator protein-1 intoxicant-induced responses of the lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002, 283: L1161-L1178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Milde-Langosch K: The Fos family of transcription factors and their role in tumourigenesis. Eur J Cancer. 2005, 41: 2449-2461. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wisdom R, Verma IM: Transformation by fos proteins requires a C-terminal transactivation domain. Mol Cell Biol. 1993, 13: 7429-7438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kustikova O, Kramerov D, Grigorian M, Berezin V, Bock E, Lukanidine E, Tulxhinsky E: Fra-1 induces morphological transformation and increases in vitro invasiveness and mobility of epithelioid adenocarcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1998, 18: 7095-7105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Belguise K, Kersual N, Galtier F, Chalbos D: Fra-1 expression level regulates proliferation and invasiveness of breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 1434-1444. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramos-Nino ME, Scapoli L, Martinelli M, Land S, Mossman BT: Microarray analysis and RNA silencing link fra-1 to cd44 and c-met expression in mesothelioma. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 3539-3545.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bergers G, Graninger P, Braselmann S, Wrighton C, Busslinger M: Transcriptional activation of the fra-1 gene by AP-1 is mediated by regulatory sequences in the first intron. Mol Cell Biol. 1995, 157: 3748-3758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zajchowski DA, Bartholdi MF, Gong Y, Webster L, Liu HL, Munishkin A, Beauheim C, Harvey S, Ethier SP, Johnson PH: Identification of gene expression profiles that predict the aggressive behavior of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 5168-5178.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiapetta G, Tallini G, De Biasio MC, Pentimalli F, de Nigris F, Losito S, Fedele M, Battista S, Verde P, Santoro M, Fusco A: Fra-1 expression in hyperplastic and neoplastic thyroid diseases. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6: 4300-4306.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Serewko MM, Popa C, Dahler AL, Smith L, Strutton GM, Coman W, Dicker AJ, Saunders NA: Alterations in gene expression and activity during squamous cell carcinoma development. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 3759-3765.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mangone FR, Brentani MM, Nonogaki S, Begnami MD, Campos AH, Walder F, Carvalho MB, Soares FA, Torloni H, Kowalski LP, Federico MH: Overexpression of Fos-related antigen-1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Exp Pathol. 2005, 86: 205-212. 10.1111/j.0959-9673.2005.00423.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gibo DM, Debinski W: Fos-Related Antigen 1 Modulates Malignant Features of Glioma Cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2005, 3: 237-249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vallone D, Battista S, Pierantoni GM, Fedele M, Casalino L, Santoro M, Viglietto G, Fusco A, Verde P: Neoplastic transformation of rat thyroid cells requires the junB and fra-1 gene induction which is dependent on the HMGI-C gene product. EMBO J. 1997, 16: 5310-5321. 10.1093/emboj/16.17.5310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu YC, Lam KY, Law S, Wong J, Srivastaval G: Identification of differentially expressed genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by cDNA 3 expression array: overexpression of fra-1, neogenin, Id-1, and CDC25B genes in ESCC. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 2213-2221.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bamberger AM, Milde-Langosch K, Rossing E, Goemann C, Loning T: Expression pattern of the AP-1 family in endometrial cancer: correlations with cell cycle regulators. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2001, 127: 545-550. 10.1007/s004320100255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zerbini LF, Wang Y, Cho JY, Libermann TA: Constitutive activation of nuclear factor kappaB p50/p65 and Fra-1 and JunD is essential for deregulated interleukin 6 expression in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 2206-2215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Andersen H, Mahmood S, Tkach V, Cohn M, Kustikova O, Grigorian M, Berezin V, Bock E, Lukanidin E, Tulchinsky E: The ability of Fos family members to produce phenotypic changes in epitheloid cells is not directly linked to their transactivation potentials. Oncogene. 2002, 21: 4843-4848. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Philips A, Teyssier C, Galtier F, Rivier-Covas C, Rey JM, Rochefort H, Chalbos D: FRA-1 Expression Level Modulates Regulation of Activator Protein-1 Activity by Estradiol in Breast Cancer Cells. Molecular Endocrinology. 1998, 12: 973-985. 10.1210/me.12.7.973.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bamberger AM, Methner C, Lisboa BW, Städtler C, Schulte HM, Lõning T, Milde-Langosch K: Expression pattern of the AP-1 family in breast cancer: association of fosB expression with a well-differntiated, receptor-positive tumor phenotype. Int J Cancer (Pred Oncol). 1999, 84: 533-538. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19991022)84:5<533::AID-IJC16>3.0.CO;2-J.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bamberger AM, Milde-Langoscha K, Schulteb HM, Löninga T: Progesterone receptor isoforms, PR-B and PR-A, in breast cancer: correlations with clinicopathologic tumor parameters and expression of AP-1 factors. Horm Res. 2000, 54: 32-37. 10.1159/000063434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Reddy SP, Kleeberger SR, Zhang Q: DEP-induced fra-1 expression correlates with a distinct activation of AP-1-dependent gene transcription in the lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004, 286: L427-L436. 10.1152/ajplung.00221.2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou BP, Liao Y, Xia W, Spohn B, Lee MH, Hung MC: Cytoplasmic localization of p21Cip1/WAF1 by Akt-induced phosphorylation in HER-2/neu-overexpressing cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2001, 3: 245-252. 10.1038/35060032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Guomin Li and Xiaobing Li (the Department of Pathology of 307 Hospital) for pathological evaluation of breast tissues. This work was supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No.7051006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100850, P.R. China

    Yuhua Song, Yan Zhang, Liyong Chen, Lu Qian, Ming Shi & Ning Guo

  2. 307 Hospital, No. 8 East Street, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100071, P.R. China

    Yuhua Song, Santai Song, Dong Zhang, Huibin Zhao & Zefei Jiang

  3. The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, P.R. China

    Yan Zhang

  4. The department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266003, P.R. China

    Yuhua Song

Authors
  1. Yuhua Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Santai Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liyong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lu Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ming Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Huibin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zefei Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ning Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zefei Jiang or Ning Guo.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

YS collected clinical data, carried out immunohistochemical study, performed statistical analysis and participated in writing the manuscript.

SS, ZJ recruited patients, designed and coordinated the study.

DZ, HZ collected clinical specimens.

YZ participated in the immunohistochemical studies

LY, LQ, MS evaluated the immunohistochemical data.

NG participated in the design of the study, supervised the laboratory work, and drafted the manuscript.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, Y., Song, S., Zhang, D. et al. An association of a simultaneous nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of Fra-1 with breast malignancy. BMC Cancer 6, 298 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-298

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-298

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us