Skip to main content

Prognostic factors in solitary plasmacytoma of the bone: a multicenter Rare Cancer Network study



Solitary plasmacytoma (SP) of the bone is a rare plasma-cell neoplasm. There are no conclusive data in the literature on the optimal radiation therapy (RT) dose in SP. Therefore, in this large retrospective study, we wanted to assess the outcome, prognostic factors, and the optimal RT dose in patients with SP.


Data from 206 patients with bone SP without evidence of multiple myeloma (MM) were collected. Histopathological diagnosis was obtained for all patients. The majority (n = 169) of the patients received RT alone; 32 chemotherapy and RT, and 5 surgery. Median follow-up was 54 months (7–245).


Five-year overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and local control was 70%, 46%, and 88%; respectively. Median time to MM development was 21 months (2–135) with a 5-year probability of 51%. In multivariate analyses, favorable factors were younger age and tumor size < 5 cm for survival; younger age for DFS; anatomic localization (vertebra vs. other) for local control. Older age was the only predictor for MM. There was no dose-response relationship for doses 30 Gy or higher, even for larger tumors.


Younger patients, especially those with vertebral localization have the best outcome when treated with moderate-dose RT. Progression to MM remains the main problem. Further investigation should focus on adjuvant chemotherapy and/or novel therapeutic agents.

Peer Review reports


Solitary plasmacytoma (SP) is a rare plasma-cell neoplasm [1]. There are two separate entities, dependent on the location of the lesion originating in either bone or extramedullary soft tissue [2]. It is defined as a proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells without evidence of significant bone-marrow plasma-cell infiltration [1]. Bone SP is characterized by a unique lesion involving any part of the squeleton, most commonly in the spine.

Recommendations for the choice of treatment modalities in this radiosensitive disease [3] are based mainly on data from retrospective studies often considering relatively small numbers of patients, with a limited ability to make any robust conclusions [4, 5], and only one prospective study including 53 patients [6].

Definitive radiation therapy (RT) is the treatment of choice for solitary plasmacytoma giving adequate local control. However, with respect to long-term outcome, it is known that bone plasmacytoma progresses more frequently to multiple myeloma (MM) than soft-tissue plasmacytoma [79].

There are no conclusive data in the literature on the optimal RT dose in SP. Many authors reported a wide range of doses varying from 30–66 Gy [1012]. Most centers use 50 Gy or more to treat SP, without any strong evidence whether doses higher than 30 Gy are needed.

We report herein the results of a retrospective multicenter study of a large cohort of patients with bone SP from European and North American centers, assessing treatment approaches, radiation dose-response effects and different prognostic factors for survival, myeloma progression, and patterns of local failure.


Between 1977 and 2001, 206 adult patients consecutively treated for a bone SP without evidence of MM were collected in a retrospective multicenter study of the Rare Cancer Network (RCN). The review board of the RCN granted ethical approval for this study, and individual centers obtained individual ethical approval according to their local regulations for retrospective studies. The study included all patients with a new diagnosis of bone SP and considered candidates for curative RT. According to the new International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria [13], a patient can be considered to have a bone SP if there is no M-protein in serum and/or urine (a small M-component may sometimes be present); only a single area of bone destruction related to clonal plasma cells; no bone marrow infiltration; normal skeletal survey including spine and pelvic MRI; and no end-organ damage other than solitary bone lesion. Our study, which was designed and conducted before the publication of the IMWG guidelines, only the following criteria were used: a patient was considered to have a bone SP if there is a biopsy-proven solitary bone lesion; <10% plasma cells in the bone-marrow biopsy; no additional pathological lesions in the skeletal diagnostic work-up; no anemia; and normal blood chemistry. The median age was 60 years (range: 18–87), and the male-to-female ratio was 1.82. Pathological diagnosis was obtained in all patients, by biopsy in 137, partial resection in 66, and complete resection in 9 patients. Spinal column was the most frequent tumor site (n = 102). Initial diagnostic work-up was done according to standard recommendations current at the time of diagnosis. Magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) was used only in 76 patients (37%). The largest diameter of the lesion was recorded in 104 patients (50%), and its median value was 5 cm (range: 1–18 cm). It was 5 cm or more in 59 patients (29%), and less than 5 cm in 45 (22%). Serum immunoglobulin levels, a factor which indicates the possibility of occult disseminated disease, were reported in 120 patients (median 6.5 g/l; range: 0–82); however, myeloma (M) protein levels were not assessed following RT [11]. In this series, serum immunoglobulin level more than 20 g/l was recorded only in 18 patients. Serum electrophoresis and immunofixation were performed in 131 patients. Beta-2 microglobulin data were recorded only for 60 patients. Human immunodeficiency-virus testing was done in only 5 patients, and all were negative. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of all patients. Median follow-up was 54 months (range: 7–245).

Table 1 Characteristics of 206 patients with bone plasmacytoma


All but 5 patients received RT. Surgical treatment was implemented in 69 (33%) patients (partial resection in 66, and complete excision in 3). Chemotherapy was given in 32 (16%) patients. The planning RT volume included the radiologically visible gross tumor volume with a sufficient margin. For vertebral SP, the planning RT volume included one vertebra above and below the involved vertebra. No attempt was made to cover regional lymph nodes. Median dose was 40 Gy (range: 20–64); median number of fractions was 20 (range: 4–33) using a median dose of 2 Gy per fraction (range: 1.25–5). To facilitate the comparison of the different fractionation schedules used by different centers, we computed the 2-Gy per fraction biologically effective dose (BED) according to the linear-quadratic model: BED = nd(1+ [d÷α/β]); where α/β = 10 for plasmacytoma; n = number of fractions; and d = dose per fraction [14]. Median BED was 40.00 Gy (range: 18.75–66.00).

Six cycles (range: 1–12) of chemotherapy consisting of melphalan and prednisone (n = 23; 72%), vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) (n = 7; 22%), and other combinations (n = 2; 6%) were administered in 32 (16%) patients.

Statistical methods

Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control, and time to MM progression were estimated using the product-limit method [15]. Time to any event was measured from the date of histological diagnosis. The events were death (all causes) for OS, and death (all causes) or relapse and/or progression to MM for DFS. For the local control rate, the event consisted of local failure, censoring patients without local relapse. For progression to MM, all patients without MM progression were censored. Confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from standard errors. Differences between groups were assessed using the log rank test [16]. Multivariate analyses were done using the Cox stepwise-regression analysis to determine the independent contribution of each prognostic factor [17].


Local control

Median time to local relapse was 20 months (range: 2–148), and was observed in 13% of the patients (n = 27). No regional lymph node relapse was observed. The 5- and 10-year probability of local control was 88% (95% CI: 83–93) and 79% (95% CI: 69–89), respectively. Ten-year local control according to the RT dose and to other candidate factors is shown in Tables 2 and 3. When considering patients with tumor diameters of 5 cm or larger (n = 59), likewise there was no clear benefit from higher doses. However, patients with vertebral lesions seemed to have a better outcome in terms of local control (Tables 3 and 4). There were 4 (80%) local relapses out of 5 patients who were treated with surgery with or without chemotherapy compared to 21 (14%) out of 148 who received RT alone, and 2 (7%) out of 30 who received RT and chemotherapy. Surgery (RT vs. partial or complete resection and RT) did not influence the 10-year probability of local control (80% [95% CI: 71–89] vs. 74% [95% CI: 47–100], p = 0.35). After adjusting RT dose to 2 Gy per fraction biologically equivalent dose, no dose-response relationship was observed for doses higher than 30 Gy (15 x 2 Gy; Fig. 1, Table 2). Among 201 irradiated patients, there were 2 (7%) local failures out of 29 patients treated with = 30 Gy vs. 20 (12%) out of 168 treated with > 30 Gy.

Table 2 Distribution of local relapses according to biologically effective radiation dose*
Table 3 Univariate analyses (logrank test)
Figure 1

Actuarial local control rate according to biologically equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction (no radiation therapy: solid/double-dot line; <30 Gy: solid line; 30–39 Gy: dashed line; 40–49 Gy: solid/single-dot line; = 50 Gy: dotted line) in 206 patients with solitary bone plasmacytoma (p < 0.0001 but not significant when excluding non irradiated patients).

Progression to multiple myeloma

Median time to development of MM was 21 months (range: 2–135). One hundred and forth (104) patients developed MM with a 5- and 10-year projected probability of 51% (95% CI: 43–59) and 72% (95% CI: 62–82), respectively (Fig. 2). Among the 120 patients where baseline immunoglobulin levels were recorded (median: 6.5 g/l; range: 0–82), 10 of 18 patients whose levels were above 20 g/l developed MM progression compared to 53 of 102 whose immunoglobulin levels were 20 g/l or less (chi-square: 0.079; p = 0.78). Moreover, in a logistic regression analysis assessing the influence of baseline serum immunoglobulin level on the development of MM, no significant correlation was found (R-square: 0.002; p = 0.60). Ten-year probability of progression to MM according to the type of SP and to other factors is shown in Table 3. The only unfavorable factor for myeloma development was older age (> 60 years) in univariate analyses. The 10-year probability of progression to MM was not influenced by anatomical location (79% for vertebra vs. 67% other; p = 0.73). MRI examination during staging work-up was not significantly associated with the 10-year probability of progression to MM (71% in both groups, p = 0.22).

Figure 2

Actuarial probability of progression to multiple myeloma in 206 patients.


At the time of analysis, 135 patients were alive (50 with disease), and 71 had died (54 died of disease including 2 with unknown causes, 16 related to intercurrent disease, and 1 from cardiopulmonary disease probably related to mediastinal RT).

In all patients, the 5- and 10-year probability of OS were 70% (95% CI: 63–77) and 50% (95% CI: 40–60), respectively; and for 5- and 10-year DFS, 46% (95% CI: 38–54) and 25% (95% CI: 16–34), respectively.

In univariate analyses, statistically significant best factors influencing the OS were younger age (60 years or younger), and tumor size (< 5 cm). Ten-year probabilities of OS and DFS according to different prognostic factors are shown in Table 3.

Multivariate analyses

Multivariate analyses revealed that the best independent factors predicting the outcome were: younger age (RR = 0.59; p < 0.00001) and tumors less than 5 cm (RR = 0.56; p = 0.0007) for OS; younger age (RR = 0.79; p = 0.02) for DFS; and vertebra localization (RR = 0.63; p = 0.04) for local control. Older age (RR = 0.78; p = 0.01) was the only independent predictor for MM development.


Early side effects according to CTC v2.0 depended on the irradiated anatomical regions [18]. Grade 1 toxicity was observed in 46 patients (22%), grade 2 in 14 (7%), and grade 3 in 4 (2%).

According to the RTOG/EORTC late effect scoring system [19], grade 1 toxicity was observed in one patient (asymptomatic bone necrosis), no grade 2 toxicity, and grade 3 toxicity in 2 (femoral head necrosis in one, and xerostomia in the other). Grade 4 pulmonary toxicity was observed in one patient who died from cardiopulmonary disease probably related to mediastinal RT toxicity.


We recently reported our experience on a series of 258 patients including bone and extramedullary SP [20]. In the present study, we wanted to specifically assess different treatment approaches, radiation dose-response effects; and different prognostic factors in patients with bone plasmacytoma. Several factors are reported to influence the outcome of SP in the literature [2, 8, 10, 12, 2024].

Despite good local control with RT, patients with bone SP progresses to MM more frequently than those with extramedullary SP [7, 10]. Many questions remain unanswered about prognostic factors influencing the outcome and radiation dose-response, probably due to the limited number of patients included in reported series [9, 12, 24]. This may be related to the lack of routine use of MRI to exclude occult lesions at initial diagnosis [25, 26]. MRI was done in only 33% of our patients (Table 1). Staging using MRI to exclude multiple lesions has contributed in recent years to more accurate diagnosis of SP, since only the patients with truly solitary involvement are eligible for curative RT [25, 26]. This may also help radiation oncologists to define target radiation volumes with higher precision [27]. Unfortunately, in this study, whether MRI examination was done or not did not result in an improved ability to predict progression to MM. However, it was not clear how often MRI was done to define the local extent of disease, rather than for the detection of occult disease in other bony sites such as the spine and pelvis. Nevertheless, in our patients who had an MRI examination, no occult asymptomatic MM lesions were detected.

There is limited information in the literature regarding the outcome of elderly patients with myeloma. Some series indicate that advanced age is clearly associated with poor survival whereas others do not [28]. In our series older age (>60 years) was found to be a bad prognostic factor, either in univariate or multivariate analyses, in terms of OS, DFS, or progression to MM. This difference may be related to several reasons. In terms of survival, older patients who develop MM are possibly treated with "less aggressive" treatments, or not included in prospective trials compared to younger patients [29]. However, it is difficult to find an explanation why our patients older than 60 years develop MM more frequently than the younger ones.

Patients in this study seemed to develop MM in two peaks. A first peak during the first three years post treatment is probably due to undetected asymptomatic gross disease becoming more obvious; a second peak corresponding to a progression of previously occult disease is observed after 6–9 years (Fig. 2). A number of patients showed very late myeloma progression, even after 10 years. Of note, while vertebral disease has been reported to be a poor prognostic factor compared to other bony localizations [7], in our series 50% of bone SP were located in the axial skeleton but no difference in terms of progression to MM was observed. However, in multivariate analysis, patients in our series with vertebral lesions had a better local control compared to other anatomical locations (Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariate analysis* (Cox model) in 201 irradiated patients

Progression to MM has been reported to be less frequent in younger patients, whose survival is also better [10, 24, 30, 31]. Our study confirmed these reports, with progression to MM seen more frequently in older patients, and improved survival in younger patients (Fig. 3, Table 3). However, local failure did not depend on age.

Baseline immunoglobulin (M protein) levels are reported to be a predictive factor of occult disseminated disease, and almost all experts agree that an M protein level of 20 g/l is crucial for the definition of SP [11, 13]. In our series, only 18 patients had an M protein level above 20 g/l, and no difference in terms of MM development was observed between patients with M protein levels above and below 20 g/l. Furthermore, patients showing persistent M protein levels for more than one year after RT are prone to progress to MM [30, 32]. This factor could not be assessed in our series because we did not have adequate data on M protein level responses to treatment, and the correlation of progression to MM with M protein persistence.

Tumor size is reported to be an important prognostic factor in terms of local control. Tsang et al [10] reported a better outcome for lesions less than 5 cm, while other studies did not find tumor size to be a factor [32]. In our series, local control was higher for plasmacytomas measuring less than 5 cm (91%) than for those 5 cm or higher (73%). It is important to note that size was not reported for 112 (43%) of the patients in our study (Table 3).

In a large review of over 400 publications from 1905 to 1997, Alexiou et al [33] reported evidence that surgery alone gave the best results for extramedullary bone plasmacytoma when clear surgical margins were obtained. In the present series, 94 patients were treated by surgery with (n = 86) or without RT (n = 8). Nine (3%) had a complete resection with negative margins; of these, only one received adjuvant RT, and seven relapsed. This finding argues against proposing surgery alone, even in cases where complete resection is achieved.

While radiation therapy is the treatment of choice for solitary plasmacytoma, the evidence of its efficacy is solely based on small retrospective studies [34]. There is no clear RT dose-response relationship in the literature. The analysis performed by Mendenhall et al [22] suggested a minimum dose of 40 Gy for optimal local control. Despite little evidence for a dose-response relationship above 30–40 Gy [8, 21, 24], some authors propose doses between 40 and 50 Gy for small lesions, and higher doses for larger tumors [23, 26, 34]. While Tsang et al [10] reported that there was no convincing dose-response relationship above 35 Gy for small lesions, they concluded that local control was related to the size of the lesion and suggested giving higher doses or combined modality treatment for bulky tumors. This has also been proposed by other groups [8].

Our data showed no correlation between local failure and radiation dose, even for large tumors (Fig. 1, Table 2). Due to its retrospective nature, these results should be interpreted with caution. However, it included a large number of patients treated with a wide spectrum of RT doses, with the finding that 30 Gy in 2-Gy fractions, or a biologically equivalent regimen was sufficient. It appears from this study that administering a higher radiation dose may be unable to overcome the negative prognostic impact of a bulky tumor on local control, in comparison with smaller tumors (Table 2). In addition to size, it is possible that other poorly documented factors (e.g. local invasiveness, proliferation rate, or morphologic grade) also impact on the risk of local relapse, and are confounding factors in a dose-response analysis.

Chemotherapy, which is not considered as a standard of care in patients with SP, has been proposed by some investigators in the initial management of bone plasmacytoma. Only one prospective study reported a benefit with combined chemotherapy and RT compared to RT alone [6]. The chemotherapy used consisted of melphalan-prednisone given every six weeks for three years. Although a limited number of patients was included (n = 53), this study concluded that combined radiochemotherapy seems to increase remission and survival duration.

Targeting the mechanisms that control angiogenesis, which has an integral role in the pathophysiology of hematologic malignancies, could be an innovative therapeutic approach in the treatment of SP. Kumar et al [35] reported high-grade angiogenesis in 64% of tumors in their series of 25 bone SP patients, and found that angiogenesis is highly correlated with progression to MM. Therefore, antiangiogenic compounds such as thalidomide, vascular-endothelial growth-factor, or proteasome inhibitors may be promising in this disease.


Overall, the results obtained in this study, to our knowledge the largest series in the literature, are in accordance with other published series [4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 21, 23, 24]. Although high rates of local control were obtained, survival was disappointing because of progression to MM. Only a large prospective study conducted by collaborative groups could answer the unresolved questions in this relatively rare disease. Following a complete staging work-up, which may include very sensitive imaging tools such as positron-emission tomography [36, 37], current evidence supports the use of involved-field moderate-dose radiation therapy. Future investigation in phase II or III prospective trials should focus on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or novel therapeutic agents.



solitary plasmacytoma


multiple myeloma


radiation therapy


magnetic-resonance imaging


biologically effective dose


overall survival


disease-free survival


confidence intervals


common toxicity criteria


Radiation Therapy Oncology Group


European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer


  1. 1.

    Knowling MA, Harwood AR, Bergsagel DE: Comparison of extramedullary plasmacytomas with solitary and multiple plasma cell tumors of bone. J Clin Oncol. 1983, 1: 255-262.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Galieni P, Cavo M, Avvisati G, Pulsoni A, Falbo R, Bonelli MA, Russo D, Petrucci MT, Bucalossi A, Tura S: Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and extramedullary plasmacytoma: two different entities?. Ann Oncol. 1995, 6: 687-691.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jyothirmayi R, Gangadharan VP, Nair MK, Rajan B: Radiotherapy in the treatment of solitary plasmacytoma. Br J Radiol. 1997, 70: 511-516.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Brinch L, Hannisdal E, Abrahamsen AF, Kvaloy S, Langholm R: Extramedullary plasmacytomas and solitary plasma cell tumours of bone. Eur J Haematol. 1990, 44: 131-134.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shih LY, Dunn P, Leung WM, Chen WJ, Wang PN: Localised plasmacytomas in Taiwan: comparison between extramedullary plasmacytoma and solitary plasmacytoma of bone. Br J Cancer. 1995, 71: 128-133.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Aviles A, Huerta-Guzman J, Delgado S, Fernadez A, Diaz-Maqueo JC: Improved outcome in solitary bone plasmacytoma with combined therapy. Hematol Oncol. 1996, 14: 111-117. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1069(199609)14:3<111::AID-HON575>3.0.CO;2-G.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dimopoulos MA, Moulopoulos LA, Maniatis A, Alexanian R: Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma. Blood. 2000, 96: 2037-2044.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mayr NA, Wen BC, Hussey DH, Burns CP, Staples JJ, Doornbos JF, Vigliotti AP: The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of solitary plasmacytomas. Radiother Oncol. 1990, 17: 293-303. 10.1016/0167-8140(90)90003-F.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Liebross RH, Ha CS, Cox JD, Weber D, Delasalle K, Alexanian R: Clinical course of solitary plasmacytoma. Radiother Oncol. 1999, 52: 245-249. 10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00114-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tsang RW, Gospodarowicz MK, Pintilie M, Bezjak A, Wells W, Hodgson DC, Stewart AK: Solitary plasmacytoma treated with radiotherapy: impactof tumor size on outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001, 50: 113-120. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01572-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dimopoulos MA, Hamilos G: Solitary bone plasmacytoma and extramedullary plasmacytoma. Current Treatment Options Oncol. 2002, 3: 255-259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bolek TW, Marcus RB, Mendenhall NP: Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and soft tissue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996, 36: 329-333. 10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00334-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    The International Myeloma Working Group: Criteria for the classification monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003, 121: 749-757. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04355.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hall EJ: Time, dose, and fractionation in radiotherapy. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. Edited by: Hall EJ. 1994, Philadelphia: Lippincott, 211-229.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958, 53: 457-481. 10.2307/2281868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Peto P, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, Mantel N, McPherson K, Peto J, Smith PG: Design and analysis of randomised clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient: part II. Br J Cancer. 1977, 35: 1-39.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Cox DR: Regression models and life tables. J Roy Stat Soc. 1972, 34: 187-220.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Trotti A, Byhardt R, Stetz J, Gwede C, Corn B, Fu K, Gunderson L, McCormick B, Morrisintegral M, Rich T, Shipley W, Curran W: Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. An improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000, 47: 13-47. 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00559-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF: Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995, 31: 1341-1346. 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ozsahin M, Tsang RW, Poortmans P, Belkacemi Y, Bolla M, Oner Dincbas F, Landmann C, Castelain B, Buijsen J, Curschmann J, Kadish SP, Kowalczyk A, Anacak Y, Hammer J, Nguyen TD, Studer G, Cooper R, Sengoz M, Scandolaro L, Zouhair A: Outcomes and patterns of failure in solitary plasmacytoma: a multicenter Rare Cancer Network study of 258 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006, 64: 210-217. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.06.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Soutar R, Lucraft H, Jackson G, Reece A, Bird J, Low E, Samson D: Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of solitary plasmacytoma of bone and solitary extramedulary plasmacytoma. Br J Haematol. 2004, 124: 717-726. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04834.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liebross RH, Ha CS, Cox JD, Weber D, Delasalle K, Alexanian R: Solitary bone plasmacytoma: outcome and prognostic factors following radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998, 41: 1063-1067. 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00186-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mendenhall CM, Thar TL, Million RR: Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and soft tissue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1980, 6: 1497-1501.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Frassica D, Frassica FJ, Schray MF, Sim FH, Kyle RA: Solitary plasmacytoma of bone: Mayo clinic experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989, 16: 43-48.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA, Weber D, Fuller L, Libshitz HI, Alexanian R: Magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of solitary plasmacytoma of bone. J Clin Oncol. 1993, 11: 1311-1315.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Vogl TJ, Steger W, Grevers G, Balzer J, Mack M, Felix R: MR characteristics of primary extramedullary plasmacytoma in the head and neck. Am J Neuroradiol. 1996, 17: 1349-1354.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Susnerwala SS, Shanks JH, Banerjee SS, Scarffe JH, Farrington WT, Slevin NJ: Extramedullary plasmacytoma of the head and neck region: clinicopathological correlation in 25 cases. Br J Cancer. 1997, 75: 921-927.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Anagnostopoulos A, Gika D, Symeonidis A, Zervas K, Pouli A, Repoussis P, Grigoraki V, Anagnostopoulos N, Economopoulos T, Maniatis A, Dimopoulos MA: Multiple myeloma in elderly patients: prognostic factors and outcome. Eur J Haematol. 2005, 75: 370-375. 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00532.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hjorth M, Holmberg E, Rodjer S, Turesson I, Westin J, Wisloff F: Survival in conventionally treated younger (<60 years) multiple myeloma patients: no improvement during two decades. Eur J Haematol. 1999, 62: 271-277.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bataille R, Sany J: Solitary myeloma: clinical and prognostic features of a review of 114 cases. Cancer. 1981, 48: 845-851.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chak LY, Cox RS, Bostwick DG, Hoppe RT: Solitary plamacytoma of bone: treatment, progression, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 1987, 5: 1811-1815.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wilder RB, Ha CS, Cox JD, Weber D, Delasalle K, Alexanian R: Persistance of myeloma protein for more than one year after radiotherapy is an adverse prognostic factor in solitary plasmacytoma of bone. Cancer. 2002, 94: 1532-1537. 10.1002/cncr.10366.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Alexiou C, Kau RJ, Dietzfelbinger H, Kremer M, Spiess JC, Schratzenstaller B, Arnold W: Extramedullary plasmacytoma: tumor occurrence and therapeutic concepts. Cancer. 1999, 85: 2305-2314. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990601)85:11<2305::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO;2-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hu K, Yahalom J: Radiotherapy in the management of plasma cell tumors. Oncology. 2000, 14: 101-111.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kumar S, Fonseca R, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Lust JA, Wellik L, Witzig TE, Gertz MA, Kyle RA, Greipp PR, Rajkumar SV: Prognostic value of angiogenesis in solitary bone plasmacytoma. Blood. 2003, 101: 1715-1717. 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2441.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Orchard K, Barrington S, Buscombe J, Hilson A, Prentice HG, Mehta A: Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of occult disease in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2002, 117: 133-135. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03407.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Schirrmeister H, Buck AK, Bergmann L, Reske SN, Bommer M: Positron emission tomography (PET) for staging of solitary plasmacytoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2003, 18: 841-845. 10.1089/108497803770418382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


The authors thank Ms. Frances Godson for her excellent secretarial assistance.

Author information




Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmut Ozsahin.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

DK, AZ, RWT, PP, YB, MB, FOD, CL, BC, and MO included patients in the study. DK, AZ, and MO realized the conception and design of the study. MO did the statistical analysis and interpretation of the data. MO and AZ drafted the manuscript, and RWT revised it critically. All the authors have read, revised, and approved the manuscript.

David Knobel, Abderrahim Zouhair contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knobel, D., Zouhair, A., Tsang, R.W. et al. Prognostic factors in solitary plasmacytoma of the bone: a multicenter Rare Cancer Network study. BMC Cancer 6, 118 (2006).

Download citation


  • Overall Survival
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Local Control
  • Plasmacytoma
  • Biologically Effective Dose