Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Infections in pediatric acute promyelocytic leukemia: from the canadian infections in acute myeloid leukemia research group

  • Sonia Cellot1,
  • Donna Johnston2,
  • David Dix3,
  • Marie-Chantal Ethier4,
  • Biljana Gillmeister4,
  • David Mitchell5,
  • Rochelle Yanofsky6,
  • Victor Lewis7,
  • Carol Portwine8,
  • Victoria Price9,
  • Shayna Zelcer10,
  • Mariana Silva11,
  • Lynette Bowes12,
  • Bruno Michon13,
  • Kent Stobart14,
  • Josee Brossard15,
  • Joseph Beyene4, 16 and
  • Lillian Sung4, 17Email author
BMC Cancer201313:276

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-276

Received: 18 December 2012

Accepted: 29 May 2013

Published: 4 June 2013

Abstract

Background

It is not known whether children with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have an infection risk similar to non- APL acute myeloid leukemia. The objective was to describe infectious risk in children with newly diagnosed APL and to describe factors associated with these infections.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study that included children ≤ 18 years of age with de novo APL treated at 15 Canadian centers. Thirty-three children with APL were included; 78.8% were treated with APL -specific protocols.

Results

Bacterial sterile site infection occurred in 12 (36.4%) and fungal sterile site infection occurred in 2 (6.1%) children. Of the 127 chemotherapy courses, 101 (79.5%) were classified as intensive and among these, the proportion in which a sterile site microbiologically documented infection occurred was 14/101 (13.9%). There was one infection-related death.

Conclusions

One third of children with APL experienced at least one sterile site bacterial infection throughout treatment and 14% of intensive chemotherapy courses were associated with a microbiologically documented sterile site infection. Infection rates in pediatric APL may be lower compared to non- APL acute myeloid leukemia although these children may still benefit from aggressive supportive care during intensive chemotherapy.

Keywords

Infection Acute promyelocytic leukemia Bacteremia Sepsis Acute myeloid leukemia

Background

Children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at substantial risk of morbidity and mortality from invasive bacterial and fungal infections [1]. Even with this large infectious burden, there is great variability in supportive care strategies used for pediatric AML across institutions [2]. Clinical trials are currently being conducted to address these uncertainties [3, 4]. However, there are some common themes; most North American centers do not use routine anti-bacterial prophylaxis (other than for Pneumocystis jirovecii) and most use fluconazole as antifungal prophylaxis [2].

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a rare sub-type of AML, comprising only 5-10% of pediatric AML [5]. These children can have a specific and life-threatening clinical presentation consisting of hemorrhage and thrombosis, resulting in a relatively high induction death rate [6]. They also uniquely experience differentiating syndrome following exposure to all-trans-retinoic acid. Children with APL are typically excluded from AML supportive care clinical trials. It is unknown whether supportive care designed for non-APL AML patients should be applied to children with APL. We chose to describe and evaluate infectious toxicities in children with APL so as to understand whether they are similar to those in children with other pediatric AML.

Because of the rarity of pediatric APL and because these children are often very ill at presentation, there are much less data available on infections in APL derived from therapeutic clinical trials compared with non-APL AML clinical trials. Consequently, we conducted a population-based retrospective study in order to describe the risk of infection in these children. The primary objective was to describe infectious risk in children with newly diagnosed APL and to determine factors associated with infections in this population.

Methods

This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study that included children with newly diagnosed APL treated at all 15 Canadian centers that care for children with cancer in each province except for Saskatchewan. This manuscript is related to a larger study in which children with newly diagnosed non-APL AML in Canada were examined [7].

Study sample

We included children and adolescents diagnosed with de novo APL between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2004 who were age ≤ 18 years at diagnosis and who received any treatment for APL. We excluded those with secondary APL and previous diagnosis of immunodeficiency.

Outcome measures

Infections were examined from initiation of APL treatment until hematopoietic recovery from the last cycle of chemotherapy, conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, relapse, persistent disease leading to a change in protocol therapy, or death (whichever occurred first). We used consistent trained clinical research associates to abstract and code the relevant information.

The rates of sterile site microbiologically documented infection [8], clinically documented infection and fever of unknown origin were expressed as the number of events during the time period at risk. Positive cultures with common contaminants such as coagulase negative Staphylococcus were only considered true infection if there were two or more positive cultures within the same episode or if the infection was associated with sepsis [9, 10]. A patient was considered to have sepsis if there was systemic inflammatory response syndrome in the presence of suspected or proven infection and organ dysfunction according to international consensus guidelines [11, 12]. Classification of clinically documented infections was based upon the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions of nosocomial infections [13]. Fever of unknown origin was defined as a fever occurring in the absence of a positive microbiology result or clinical site of infection. Infections were evaluated separately among intensive and non-intensive courses. Induction and consolidation chemotherapy were considered intensive. Maintenance chemotherapy was considered non-intensive and the entire maintenance period was considered one treatment course as we were most interested in intensive treatment in terms of infection outcomes.

Potential predictors

We chose to evaluate factors potentially associated with infection outcomes only among intensive chemotherapy courses as these are the most clinically relevant from an infection supportive care perspective. The following variables were evaluated: (1) Child characteristics at diagnosis (age and obese versus non-obese); (2) Treatment characteristics (APL-specific treatment protocol, registration on APL trial, diagnosis prior to January 1, 2000, and cumulative dose of cytarabine in grams/m2); (3) Course characteristics (neutropenia at the start of the course, neutropenia >15 days (threshold chosen a priori), and days systemic corticosteroids were administered for any reason).

Obesity was defined as a body mass index ≥ 95 percentile for age and gender according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for those at least 2 years of age [14].

Statistics

Regression analyses were conducted at the course level and only included intensive chemotherapy. Factors associated with rates of microbiologically documented sterile site infection, clinically documented infection and fever of unknown origin were examined using repeated measures Poisson regression and the association was expressed as a rate ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Multiple regression was conducted using variables significant in univariate analysis. In order to evaluate co-linearity and which variables should not be concurrently included in the multiple regression model, Spearman correlation coefficients (r) were examined. All tests of significance were two-sided, and statistical significance was defined as P <0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS statistical program (SAS-PC, version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Ethical approvals

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at The Hospital for Sick Children and local Research Ethics Boards of the 14 other participating sites (McMaster University-Hamilton Health Sciences/Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, Montreal Children’s Hospital Research Ethics Board, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Ethics Board, University of Winnipeg Research Ethics Board, University of British Columbia/Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia Research Ethics Board, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, IWK Research Ethics Board, Queen’s University-Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, University of Western Ontario Research Ethics Board for Health Science Research Involving Human Subjects, Memorial University Human Investigation Committee, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec Research Ethics Board, University of Alberta Health Research Ethics Board-Biomedical Panel, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke Research Ethics Board). As this was a retrospective review study the Research Ethics Board at The Hospital for Sick Children and those at the 14 other participating sites waived the need for written informed consent.

Results

In terms of demographics, of the 33 children with APL included in this analysis, most (78.8%) were treated according to APL-specific protocols (Table 1). The median days receiving intensive chemotherapy (from first to last administration) was 79 days (interquartile range (IQR) 67 to 104 days) and the median days receiving maintenance chemotherapy was 396 days (IQR 135 to 565 days). Among the 33 children, throughout the course of therapy, 12 (36.4%) experienced any bacterial sterile site infection and 2 (6.1%) experienced any fungal sterile site infection (both candidemia).
Table 1

Demographic and treatment characteristics for children with acute promyelocytic leukemia (N = 33)

 

Value

Child characteristics at diagnosis

 

Male (%)

16 (48.5)

Median age in years (IQR)

12.5 (7.2, 15.6)

Down syndrome (%)

1 (3.0)

Body mass index (%), N = 321

 

Obese

10 (31.2)

Normal weight

22 (68.8)

Median white blood cell count at diagnosis (×109/L) (IQR)

4.8 (2.5, 15.0)

Median absolute neutrophil count at diagnosis (×109/L) (IQR)2

0.2 (0.1, 1.1)

Cytogenetics (%)

 

t(15;17) (q22;q12) (PML/RARα) and variants

28 (84.8)

Unknown

5 (15.2)

Treatment characteristics

 

Protocol (%)

 

APL-specific3

26 (78.8)

Non-APL specific AML protocol

7 (21.2)

Registered on study (%)

4 (12.1)

Abbreviations: IQR interquartile range, APL acute promyelocytic leukemia, AML acute myeloid leukemia; 1 One patient < 2 years of age at diagnosis; 2 ANC unavailable for two patients at diagnosis; 3 Includes APL standard of care (n = 1), Children’s Cancer Group 2911 (n = 5), Children’s Oncology Group A9710 (n = 20).

Table 2 illustrates the course characteristics and supportive care received among all 127 courses; 101 were classified as intensive (79.5%) and 99 were classified as APL specific (78.0%). Among intensive treatment courses, the proportion in which a sterile site microbiologically documented infection occurred was 14/101 (13.9%) while the number in which a sterile site fungal infection occurred was 2/101 (2.0%). The table also illustrates that there were 8 courses complicated by sepsis and 1 infection-related death due to Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia.
Table 2

Course characteristics and infection outcomes (N = 127)

 

All (N = 127)

Intensive treatment (N = 101)

APL-specific treatment (N = 99)

Course characteristics

   

Number with neutropenia (ANC <0.5 × 109) at start of course (%)

27 (21.3)

27 (26.7)

21 (21.2)

Median days with neutropenia1(IQR)

7.5 (0.0, 19.0)

11.0 (0.0, 20.0)

3.0 (0.0, 18.0)

Median days receiving systemic corticosteroids (IQR)

0.0 (0.0, 5.0)

0.0 (0.0, 6.0)

0.0 (0.0, 3.0)

Median corticosteroid dose1 (IQR)

0.0 (0.0, 29.7)

0.0 (0.0, 38.4)

0.0 (0.0, 5.7)

Supportive care

   

Co-trimoxazole prophylaxis (%)

89 (70.1)

71 (70.3)

77 (77.8)

Other antibacterial prophylaxis (%)

0

0

0

Fluconazole prophylaxis (%)

30 (23.6)

27 (26.7)

18 (18.2)

Infection outcomes 2

   

Sterile site microbiologically documented infection (%)

15 (11.8)

14 (13.9)

9 (9.1)

Sterile site Gram-positive (%)

12 (9.5)

11 (10.9)

7 (7.1)

Sterile site Gram-negative (%)

4 (3.2)

4 (4.0)

2 (2.0)

Sterile site fungus (%)

2 (1.6)

2 (2.0)

2 (2.0)

Bacteremia (%)

11 (8.7)

10 (9.9)

7 (7.1)

Clinically documented infection (%)

30 (23.6)

24 (23.8)

26 (26.3)

Sepsis

8 (6.3)

7 (6.9)

8 (8.1)

Infectious death

1 (0.8)

1 (1.0)

1 (1.0)

Abbreviations: ANC absolute neutrophil count, IQR interquartile range; 1 Presented as mg/m2 of dexamethasone equivalents; 2Infection outcomes represent at least one event per course; number of specific infections do not add to the total as 3 courses had multiple infection types.

Treatment with an APL-specific protocol was not associated with significantly fewer microbiologically documented sterile site infections when only intensive treatment courses were included (Table 3). Only treatment in an earlier era, and a higher cytarabine dose were associated with higher rates of infection. Neutropenia at the start of the course and prolonged neutropenia were both significantly associated with clinically documented infection (Table 3). Finally, the only factors associated with more fever of unknown origin were younger age and diagnosis in an earlier era.
Table 3

Predictors of the rates of microbiologically documented sterile site infection clinically documented infection and fever of unknown origin per course among intensive treatment courses (N = 101)

 

Microbiological sterile site

Clinically documented

Fever of unknown origin

 

Rate ratio

P value

Rate ratio

P value

Rate ratio

P value

 

(CI)

 

(CI)

 

(CI)

 

Child characteristics at diagnosis

    

Age in years

0.92

0.082

0.99

0.748

0.92

0.025

(0.84, 1.01)

 

(0.92, 1.06)

 

(0.85, 0.99)

 

Obese vs. non-obese1

0.92

0.891

0.60

0.268

0.40

0.103

(0.29, 2.93)

 

(0.24, 1.48)

 

(0.13, 1.20)

 

Treatment characteristics

     

APL-specific treatment protocol

0.77

0.643

2.63

0.127

0.69

0.496

(0.25, 2.37)

 

(0.76, 9.10)

 

(0.24, 2.01)

 

Registered on study

1.91

0.162

1.24

0.553

0.49

0.385

(0.77, 4.70)

 

(0.62, 2.48)

 

(0.10, 2.43)

 

Diagnosed prior to January 1, 2000

3.18

0.030

1.22

0.691

2.87

0.018

(1.12, 9.04)

 

(0.46, 3.18)

 

(1.20, 6.86)

 

Cumulative dose of cytarabine (g/m2)

1.09

0.008

0.97

0.522

0.99

0.763

(1.02, 1.16)

 

(0.88, 1.07)

 

(0.90, 1.08)

 

Course characteristics

     

Neutropenia (ANC <0.5 ×109) at start of course

0.99

0.990

5.68

<0.0001

1.36

0.436

(0.32, 3.06)

 

(2.42, 13.31)

 

(0.63, 2.93)

 

Greater than 15 days with neutropenia

2.04

0.208

4.18

0.001

2.01

0.138

(0.67, 6.21)

 

(1.81, 9.62)

 

(0.80, 5.07)

 

Days receiving corticosteroids

1.04

0.064

1.03

0.075

1.01

0.555

(1.00, 1.09)

 

(1.00, 1.07)

 

(0.97, 1.05)

 

Abbreviations: APL acute promyelocytic leukemia, ANC absolute neutrophil count, CI confidence interval; 1 Obesity only available for children ≥ 2 years of age.

When evaluating course characteristics, diagnosis prior to January 1, 2000 was correlated with cumulative cytarabine dose (Spearman r = 0.385, P < 0.0001) and thus, multiple regression was not conducted for microbiologically documented sterile site infection. Similarly, neutropenia at the start of the course was correlated with prolonged duration of neutropenia (Spearman r = 0.469, P < 0.0001) and thus, multiple regression was also not conducted for clinically documented infection. Age (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99; P = 0.033) and diagnosis in an earlier era (RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.17 to 5.46; P = 0.019) were both independently associated with fever of unknown origin.

Of the specific infections documented, Gram-positive bacterial infections were more common than Gram-negative or fungal infections (Table 4). Among the 3 fungal infections, 2 were from a sterile site (both Candida albicans) while 1 was from a non-sterile site (Alternaria species). Only the patient with Alternaria infection received antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole.
Table 4

Microbiologically documented infections observed during therapy (N = 29)

Organism

n (%)

Sterile site bacteria*

 

 Gram positive

13 (44.8)

 Viridans group streptococci

6 (20.7)

 Coagulase negative staphylococci

5 (17.2)

Enterococcus faecalis

1 (3.4)

Mycoplasma pneumoniae

1 (3.4)

 Gram Negative

4 (13.8)

Escherichia coli

2 (7.0)

Klebsiella pneumoniae

1 (3.4)

Enterobacter cloacae

1 (3.4)

Fungus*

3 (10.3)

Candida albicans

2 (7.0)

Alternaria NOS

1 (3.4)

Virus*

9 (31.0)

 Herpes simplex virus

2 (7.0)

 Respiratory syncytial virus

1 (3.4)

 Torovirus

4 (13.8)

 Other1

2 (7.0)

Abbreviation: NOS not otherwise specified;

* For bacterial infections, only sterile site positive cultures are shown. For fungi and viruses, both sterile and non-sterile site positive cultures are shown;

1 Others were adenovirus (n = 1) and influenza A (n = 1).

Discussion

We found that among children with APL, one third experienced at least one sterile site bacterial infection throughout treatment and 14% of intensive chemotherapy courses were associated with a microbiologically documented sterile site infection. Invasive fungal infection was rare but did occur. Further, we found that the risk of infection has decreased over time.

These infection rates appear lower than those described for pediatric non-APL AML treatment protocols. In an evaluation of children enrolled on the Children’s Cancer Group 2961 protocol, more than 60% of children experienced a microbiologically documented infection during each course of therapy [15]. In an analysis of AAML0531, the most recently completed Children’s Oncology Group phase 3 AML trial, over 80% of children experienced at least one sterile site bacterial infection while 14% experienced at least one sterile site fungal infection throughout chemotherapy. The risk of sterile site bacterial infection was 30 to 60% per course [16].

Within our Canadian study focused on infections in AML, the cumulative risk of bacteremia was 54.3% for children with non-APL AML [7], compared with a 36.4% for any sterile site bacterial infection in this APL-specific study [7]. When comparing the risk by course, the risk of sterile site microbiologically documented infection was 24.5% in non-APL AML in comparison to 13.9% among intensively treated courses in APL [7]. When put together, these data suggest that the overall risk of invasive infections among children with APL may be less than that experienced by children with non-APL AML. Nonetheless, many children experienced invasive infections and there were two episodes of candidemia and one infection-related death. Furthermore, we did not find that APL-specific treatment protocol was associated with significantly fewer sterile site microbiologically documented infection in regression analysis although power was limited. Consequently, children with APL may benefit from aggressive supportive care similar to children with non-APL AML, at least during intensive courses of chemotherapy.

The rates of infection and infectious deaths have been variable on adult-predominated APL clinical trials [1719]. However, almost none of these studies focused on infection outcomes. Girmenia et al [20]. evaluated 89 adult and pediatric patients with APL treated with the AIDA (all-trans retinoic acid plus idarubicin) protocol. Microbiologically documented infection occurred in 37.4% of patients. Fungal infections were rare. They compared bloodstream infections in APL patients with other AML patients and concluded that the incidence of total septicemia, fungemia and coagulase-negative staphylococci were significantly lower in APL. One infection-related death was observed. Consequently, our results are similar to this study.

In our study of pediatric non-APL AML patients, we found that exposure to corticosteroids was the most important factor associated with infection outcomes [7]. In contrast, within this analysis, we found that the association between duration of corticosteroids and rate of microbiologically documented infection was not statistically significant (rate ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.09; P = 0.064). However, given the observed lower confidence interval of 1.00, it is possible that this analysis was underpowered to demonstrate an association.

In this study, 6% of courses were complicated by sepsis. It is difficult to know how many courses were, in fact, truly complicated by infection-related sepsis since sepsis and differentiation syndrome associated with all-trans-retinoic acid have many similar features. Jeddi and colleagues recently highlighted how differentiation syndrome, which is thought to be mediated through inflammatory cytokines generated by APL cells, may not be distinguishable from sepsis [21]. Nonetheless, our report does provide reassuring data since we have likely over-estimated the rate of sepsis and the true rate may be lower.

The strength of our report is that we conducted a population-based analysis of a very rare sub-type of AML in children and we were able to measure infections very accurately because of the use of consistent and specifically trained personnel. The inclusion of very ill patients at presentation is another important strength of this study. However, our report must be interpreted in light of its limitations. APL treatments were heterogeneous. Second, supportive care strategies were also variable between centers. Finally, the sample size was small and many analyses were performed; consequently the results should be considered hypothesis generating rather than definitive.

Conclusions

In summary, one third of children with APL experienced at least one sterile site bacterial infection throughout treatment and 14% of intensive chemotherapy courses were associated with a microbiologically documented sterile site infection. Infection rates in pediatric APL may be lower compared to non-APL AML although these children may still benefit from aggressive supportive care during intensive chemotherapy. Aggressive support care could include mandatory hospitalization during neutropenia and prophylactic antibacterial and antifungal strategies.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Canadian Cancer Society (Grant #019468) and the C17 Research Network. LS is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Canadian infections in AML research group

David Dix (PI), Buffy Menjou (CRA) and Nita Takeuchi (CRA) from British Columbia Children’s Hospital; Kent Stobart (PI), Brenda Ennis (CRA) and Linda Churcher (CRA) from Stollery Children’s Hospital; Victor Lewis (PI), Janice Hamilton (CRA) and Karen Mazil (CRA) from Alberta Children’s Hospital; Sonia Cellot (PI), Dominique Lafreniere (CRA) and Catherine Desjean (CRA) from Hospital Sainte-Justine; Victoria Price (PI), Tina Bocking (CRA), Lynn Russell (CRA) and Emily Murray (CRA) from IWK Health Centre; Lynette Bowes (PI) and Gale Roberts (CRA) from Janeway Child Health Centre; Carol Portwine (PI) and Sabrina Siciliano (CRA) from McMaster Children’s Hospital at Hamilton Health Sciences; Joseph Beyene (Collaborator) from McMaster University; Mariana Silva (PI) from the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston; Rochelle Yanofsky (PI), Rebekah Hiebert (CRA) and Krista Mueller (CRA) from CancerCare Manitoba; Shayna Zelcer (PI), Martha Rolland (CRA) and Julie Nichols (CRA) from London Health Sciences; Donna Johnston (PI) and Elaine Dollard (CRA) from Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario; David Mitchell (PI), Martine Nagy (CRA) and Margaret Hin Chan (CRA) from Montreal Children’s Hospital; Bruno Michon (PI), Josee Legris (CRA) and Marie-Christine Gagnon (CRA) from Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec; Josee Brossard (PI) and Lise Bilodeau (CRA) from Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke; Lillian Sung (PI), Biljana Gillmeister (CRA), Marie-Chantal Ethier (CRA), Renee Freeman (Collaborator), Jeffrey Traubici (Collaborator), and Upton Allen (Collaborator) from The Hospital for Sick Children.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hematology/Oncology, Hospital Sainte-Justine
(2)
Hematology Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario
(3)
Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, British Columbia Children’s Hospital
(4)
Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children
(5)
Hematology/Oncology, Montreal Children’s Hospital
(6)
Hematology/Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba
(7)
Hematology/Oncology/Transplant Program, Alberta Children’s Hospital
(8)
Hematology/Oncology, McMaster Children’s Hospital at Hamilton Health Sciences
(9)
Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre
(10)
Hematology/Oncology, London Health Sciences
(11)
Hematology/Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston
(12)
Hematology/Oncology, Janeway Child Health Center
(13)
Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Centre, Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec
(14)
Stollery Children’s Hospital, University of Alberta Hospital
(15)
Hematology/Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
(16)
Population Genomics Program, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University
(17)
Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children

References

  1. Hann I, Viscoli C, Paesmans M, Gaya H, Glauser M, International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group (IATCG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): A comparison of outcome from febrile neutropenic episodes in children compared with adults: results from four EORTC studies. Br J Haematol. 1997, 99 (3): 580-588. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.4453255.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lehrnbecher T, Ethier MC, Zaoutis T, Creutzig U, Gamis A, Reinhardt D, Aplenc R, Sung L: International variations in infection supportive care practices for paediatric patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2009, 147 (1): 125-128. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07844.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander S, Nieder M, Zerr DM, Fisher BT, Dvorak CC, Sung L: Prevention of bacterial infection in pediatric oncology: what do we know, what can we learn?. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012, 59 (1): 16-20. 10.1002/pbc.23416.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dvorak CC, Fisher BT, Sung L, Steinbach WJ, Nieder M, Alexander S, Zaoutis TE: Antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric hematology/oncology: new choices & new data. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012, 59 (1): 21-26. 10.1002/pbc.23415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gregory J, Feusner J: Acute promyelocytic leukemia in childhood. Curr Oncol Rep. 2009, 11 (6): 439-445. 10.1007/s11912-009-0060-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yoo ES: Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of childhood acute promyelocytic leukemia. Korean J Pediatr. 2011, 54 (3): 95-105. 10.3345/kjp.2011.54.3.95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Dix D, Cellot S, Price V, Gillmeister B, Ethier MC, Johnston DL, Lewis V, Michon B, Mitchell D, Stobart K: Association between Corticosteroids and Infection, Sepsis and Infectious Death in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia: from the Canadian Infections in AML Research Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 55 (12): 1608-1614. 10.1093/cid/cis774.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Santolaya ME, Alvarez AM, Becker A, Cofre J, Enriquez N, O’Ryan M, Paya E, Pilorget J, Salgado C, Tordecilla J: Prospective, multicenter evaluation of risk factors associated with invasive bacterial infection in children with cancer, neutropenia, and fever. J Clin Oncol. 2001, 19 (14): 3415-3421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouza E, Cobo-Soriano R, Rodriguez-Creixems M, Munoz P, Suarez-Leoz M, Cortes C: A prospective search for ocular lesions in hospitalized patients with significant bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2000, 30 (2): 306-312. 10.1086/313648.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chirouze C, Schuhmacher H, Rabaud C, Gil H, Khayat N, Estavoyer JM, May T, Hoen B: Low serum procalcitonin level accurately predicts the absence of bacteremia in adult patients with acute fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2002, 35 (2): 156-161. 10.1086/341023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A: International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005, 6 (1): 2-8. 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, Cohen J, Opal SM, Vincent JL, Ramsay G: 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med. 2003, 29 (4): 530-538.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM: CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. APIC Infection Control and Applied Epidemiology: Principles and Practice. Edited by: Olmsted RN. 1996, St. Louis: MosbyGoogle Scholar
  14. Ogden CL, Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Mei Z, Guo S, Wei R, Grummer-Strawn LM, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts for the United States: improvements to the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics version. Pediatrics. 2002, 109 (1): 45-60. 10.1542/peds.109.1.45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sung L, Lange BJ, Gerbing RB, Alonzo TA, Feusner J: Microbiologically documented infections and infection-related mortality in children with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2007, 110 (10): 3532-3539. 10.1182/blood-2007-05-091942.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sung L, Aplenc R, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, Meshinchi S, Burden L, Raimondi S, Hirsch B, Kahwash S, Heerema-McKenney A: Severe toxicities during pediatric acute myeloid leukemia chemotherapy: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Am Soc Hematol. 2010, 166: 1071-Google Scholar
  17. Avvisati G, Petti MC, Lo-Coco F, Vegna ML, Amadori S, Baccarani M, Cantore N, Di Bona E, Ferrara F, Fioritoni G: Induction therapy with idarubicin alone significantly influences event-free survival duration in patients with newly diagnosed hypergranular acute promyelocytic leukemia: final results of the GIMEMA randomized study LAP 0389 with 7 years of minimal follow-up. Blood. 2002, 100 (9): 3141-3146. 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0352.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. de la Serna J, Montesinos P, Vellenga E, Rayon C, Parody R, Leon A, Esteve J, Bergua JM, Milone G, Deben G: Causes and prognostic factors of remission induction failure in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid and idarubicin. Blood. 2008, 111 (7): 3395-3402. 10.1182/blood-2007-07-100669.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang BT, Zeng QC, Gurung A, Zhao WH, Xiao Z, Li BS: The early zion of arsenic trioxide versus high-dose arabinoside is more effective and safe as consolidation chemotherapy for risk-tailored patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: multicenter experience. Med Oncol. 2012, 29 (3): 2088-2094. 10.1007/s12032-011-0099-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Girmenia C, Lo Coco F, Breccia M, Latagliata R, Spadea A, D’Andrea M, Gentile G, Micozzi A, Alimena G, Martino P: Infectious complications in patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia treated with the AIDA regimen. Leukemia. 2003, 17 (5): 925-930. 10.1038/sj.leu.2402899.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeddi R, Ghedira H, Amor RB, Menif S, Belhadjali Z, Meddeb B: Recurrent differentiation syndrome or septic shock? Unresolved dilemma in a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Med Oncol. 2011, 28 (1): 279-281. 10.1007/s12032-010-9462-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/276/prepub

Copyright

© Cellot et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.