This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Irradiation of the potential cancer stem cell niches in the adult brain improves progression-free survival of patients with malignant glioma
- Patrick Evers†1,
- Percy P Lee†1, 2,
- John DeMarco1,
- Nzhde Agazaryan1,
- James W Sayre3,
- Michael Selch1, 2 and
- Frank Pajonk1, 2Email author
© Evers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 26 February 2010
Accepted: 21 July 2010
Published: 21 July 2010
Glioblastoma is the most common brain tumor in adults. The mechanisms leading to glioblastoma are not well understood but animal studies support that inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in neural stem cells (NSC) is required and sufficient to induce glial cancers. This suggests that the NSC niches in the brain may harbor cancer stem cells (CSCs), Thus providing novel therapy targets. We hypothesize that higher radiation doses to these NSC niches improve patient survival by eradicating CSCs.
55 adult patients with Grade 3 or Grade 4 glial cancer treated with radiotherapy at UCLA between February of 2003 and May of 2009 were included in this retrospective study. Using radiation planning software and patient radiological records, the SVZ and SGL were reconstructed for each of these patients and dosimetry data for these structures was calculated.
Using Kaplan-Meier analysis we show that patients whose bilateral subventricular zone (SVZ) received greater than the median SVZ dose (= 43 Gy) had a significant improvement in progression-free survival if compared to patients who received less than the median dose (15.0 vs 7.2 months PFS; P = 0.028). Furthermore, a mean dose >43 Gy to the bilateral SVZ yielded a hazard ratio of 0.73 (P = 0.019). Importantly, similarly analyzing total prescription dose failed to illustrate a statistically significant impact.
Our study leads us to hypothesize that in glioma targeted radiotherapy of the stem cell niches in the adult brain could yield significant benefits over radiotherapy of the primary tumor mass alone and that damage caused by smaller fractions of radiation maybe less efficiently detected by the DNA repair mechanisms in CSCs.
Glioblastoma (GB) is the most aggressive form of brain tumors in adults. The current standard of care combines surgery and radiotherapy with drug treatment [1, 2]. Even with this multi-modality approach, the median survival is only around 14 months with early recurrences primarily found in the brain.
Recent preclinical and clinical data provide convincing evidence that GBs are organized hierarchically with a small number of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which have the unique ability to self-renew and exhibit multi-lineage potency while their progeny lack these features [3–5]. The carcinogenesis of gliomas is still incompletely understood but carcinogenesis in general requires the acquisition of several mutations of tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes in normal cells to transform them into malignant tumor cells. In the human brain, the 3-5 mm thick lateral periventricular region of the lateral ventricles - the subventricular zone (SVZ) - and a subsection of the hippocampal formation - the subgranular layer (SGL) - have been shown to harbor normal brain stem cells [6–9]. These regions are believed to contain specific regions of so-called stem cell niches, which support neuronal stem cells and keep them in an undifferentiated state. A recent preclinical study suggested that tumor suppressor gene deletion in normal neural stem cells (NSCs) but not in their differentiated progeny leads to tumor formation in the brain . It is suspected that specific niches in the brain also house CSCs  and that CSCs are relatively resistant to established anti-tumor therapies like radiation  and chemotherapy . It has also been shown that the NSCs in these anatomical niches experience amplified division under conditions of cortical damage and their daughter cells (both glial and neuronal) are routed towards the point of injury, perhaps in a repair effort, as well as to the contralateral hemisphere . Together, this provides a model by which we can understand how GB recurs bilaterally post-craniotomy as is often seen clinically .
According to the cancer stem cell hypothesis, all CSCs need to be eliminated in order to cure cancer . Therefore, we hypothesized that the normal tissue stem cells niche in the brain may be a reservoir for CSCs from where they initiate and repopulate a tumor and that irradiation of the potential cancer stem cell niches in the brain would improve patient survival.
To test our hypothesis we performed a retrospective analysis of radiation treatment plans of high-grade glioma patients to study the effect of the radiation dose inadvertently delivered to the periventricular stem cells niche on the progression free survival (PFS) of these patients.
Due to the thin width of the periventricular contour, Eclipse's™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) post-processing modification functionality was necessary to extrapolate the inter-slice volumes and generate a continuous structure. The average volume of our reconstructed ipsilateral hippocampal formation was 4.4 cm3 (95% CI: 4.0-4.8) and 5.05 cm3 (95% CI: 4.69-5.40) for a unilateral periventricular region. Dose-volume histograms were calculated and mean dosing was extracted as the output of interest.
DNA was isolated from FFPE using Ambion Recoverall Kit (Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Foster City, CA). DNA samples were bisulfite-modified using the Zymo Research EZ-DNA Methylation Gold Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA) according to manufacturer's directions. For MGMT, samples were subjected to a two-stage nested PCR strategy. The first-stage primers were 5'-GGATATGTTG GGATAGTT-3' and 5'-CCAAAAACCCCAAACCC-3' and second-stage primers were unmethylated reaction: 5'-TTTGTGTTTTGATGTTTGTAGGTTTTTGT-3' and 5'-AACTCCACACTCTTCCAAAAACAAAACA-3'; methylated reaction: 5'-TTTCGACGTTCGTAGGTTTTCGC-3' and 5'-GCACTCTTCCGAAAACGAAACG-3'. PCR products were analyzed on 3% agarose gels.
Statistical tests were executed SPSS (version 17; SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). The primary end-point in this retrospective study was PFS as defined as the number of months after the cessation of radiotherapy until the establishment of radiological evidence of disease progression. This establishment of radiological indication of progression must have been agreed upon by the treating neurooncologist.
The dosimetry data was extracted as a mean dose value for each structure of interest: ipsilateral PV, contralateral PV, bilateral PV, and ipsilateral HF. For each structure, these doses were divided at their median value into a high dose arm (those patients who received greater than the median dose) and a low dose arm (those patients who received a less than median dose).
Kaplan-Meier plots were calculated with event times being the time since the cessation of therapy until progression or death, whichever occurred first . Subjects who neither died nor had cancer progressing were censored at time of their last follow-up. Patients were stratified based the total prescribed dose and dose delivered to both periventricular regions.
Relative risks were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model . Dose to the bilateral periventricular region was entered as a continuous variable. A model including dose to the periventricular region, total dose administered, RPA (recursive partitioning analysis) class, total resection intervention, and tumor location as construct model effects provided adjusted relative risks that corresponded to the Kaplan-Meier analyses. The log partial likelihood was compared with that of a model without interaction in order to test whether the dose to the periventricular region relative risks differed significantly with between the low- and the high-dose group. The log partial likelihood ratio test was used.
Study subject characteristics
# of Subjects
Low PV Dose
High PV Dose
Mean Age at RT (range)
52 ± 6 (25-82)
51 ± 5 (26-77)
Median Karnofsky Perf. Scale (range)
Mean RPA Classification
# of RPA Class III
# of RPA Class IV
# of RPA Class V
Mean Bilateral PV Dose
27 Gy ± 5
50 Gy ± 2
Median Ipsilateral PV Dose
46 Gy ± 15.5
Median Contralateral PV Dose
41 Gy ± 16.1
Median Ipsilateral HF Dose
49.9 Gy ± 16.3
Mean Total Prescription Dose (range)
52 Gy ± 4 (30-63)
57 Gy ± 2 (45-60)
Cox regression analysis of progression-free survival
Total Tumor Dose
Even after optimal conventional treatment, the outcome for patients suffering from GB is currently unacceptable and drugs like temozolamide add only little survival benefit for the patients, which comes at very high costs and is accompanied by considerable toxicity . Presently, while many other cancers are cured by radiation treatment, most patients suffering from glioblastoma relapse after radiotherapy. This is despite the fact that patients suffering from glioblastoma are generally treated with relatively high total radiation doses and SF2 Gy (surviving fraction at 2 Gy) values for glioblastoma cells in-vitro are not exceptionally high . A possible explanation for the failure of radiotherapy to cure patients from GB is the observation that glioma cells migrate widely into healthy bilateral brain tissue [22, 23] from one or more foci of origin. These isolated cells are not detected by current radiological techniques or even biological imaging and therefore usually not included into the target volume during radiotherapy.
In our present study we tested the hypothesis that the dose prescribed to the normal tissue stem cell niche in the adult brain would impact the effectiveness of radiotherapy for patients suffering from glioblastoma as these niches may serve as a harbor for radioresistant glioma stem cells, which are the only cells in a glioblastoma believed to able to repopulate a tumor . Our hypothesis was based on previous reports showing that adult normal tissue stem cells reside in the lateral periventricular regions of the lateral ventricles and the hippocampus [6, 9] and animal studies reporting that transformation of normal tissues stem cells but not differentiated cells lead to tumor formation [24–27]. The unique anatomical patterns of the brain that clearly separate stem cell niches as a potential pool of CSCs from differentiated tissue make the brain an ideal model system to study the impact of radiation dose given to these stem cell niches.
Our study has several shortcomings. First, this is a retrospective analysis and as such, it needs validation in a prospective trial. Second, even though all but one patient received temozolamide in combination with radiation, we do not have MGMT (O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase) promoter methylation data for all our patients. Therefore, it is possible that that the group of patients receiving higher doses to the PV region had predominantly unmethylated MGMT promoters. Finally, we did not assess the effect of the PV dose on overall survival because after tumor recurrence patients were subjected to various salvage therapies. The heterogeneous nature of the treatments applied would not have allowed for any conclusions regarding the radiation treatment and future studies would have to account for this in the study design.
However, our observation fits well into the current understanding of neural progenitor cell migratory patterns out of these stem cell niches. In the adult brain, the SGL NSCs send their differentiated daughter cells solely into the granular layer of the hippocampus. No evidence for the SGL distributing cells throughout the cortex has yet been described. Accordingly, our data indicating that the magnitude of radiotherapy directed at the SGL provides no significant impact on progression is unsurprising. The periventricular SVZ however, has been shown by Goings et al. to respond to cortical injury by increasing neurogenesis and sending migratory cells into the corpus callosum, in the cortex at the edge of the lesion and on migratory projections between the lesion and the SVZ . Incorporating this migratory pattern with the assertions of Llaguno et al. that it is the NSCs held in the SVZ that hold the malignant transformation potential to give rise to glioma , our data indicate that efforts to eradicate these SVZ CSCs bilaterally may lead to a survival advantage for glioblastoma patients.
Previous clinical studies prescribing 45 Gy to the normal brain with a 15 Gy boost for the tumor region did not yield in significant improvements of clinical outcome . The major differences between these studies and our analysis is that the SVZ in our study was mostly outside the clinical target volume and radiation applied to the SVZ was therefore given in smaller fractions (1.36 Gy, CI: 1.2 - 1.5). Additionally, radiotherapy techniques and imaging capabilities have dramatically evolved since these early trials and therefore, these historic data may not easily be comparable to modern treatment. The relative resistance of CSCs to ionizing radiation is believed to be caused by increased free radical scavenger expression  and activation of DNA damage checkpoints  in CSCs. We hypothesize that CSCs exhibit a threshold for DNA damage recognition and damage caused by subclinical fractions of radiation may remain undetected by the DNA repair response in CSCs. This is supported by previous reports describing low dose hypersensitivity for GB cells [31, 32] although low-dose hypersensitivity has not been studied in CSCs specifically yet and needs to be addressed in future studies.
In this study, we have illustrated an increase in PFS among glioblastoma patients when treated with periventricular dosing in excess of 43 Gy. Prescription of a defined dose to the periventricular region may be a way to improve treatment responses in patients with high-grade gliomas. However, the periventricular regions and the hippocampus are locations of adult neurogenesis and thought to contribute to normal tissue repair in the brain. Even though current survival times for most GB patients are too short to allow the observation of long-term normal tissue side effects this may change with improved outcome. Therefore, prospective, randomized clinical trials should be initiated to address the efficacy and toxicity of including the periventricular regions as additional target volumes into treatment plans for patients suffering from glioblastoma with optimal dosing yet to be determined.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
We thank Dr. Albert Lei, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA for proving the MGMT methylation data. This work was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute 1R01CA137110-01A2 to FP.
- Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, et al: Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 987-996. 10.1056/NEJMoa043330.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, et al: Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10: 459-466. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hemmati HD, Nakano I, Lazareff JA, Masterman-Smith M, Geschwind DH, Bronner-Fraser M, Kornblum HI: Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 15178-15183. 10.1073/pnas.2036535100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J, Dirks PB: Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 5821-5828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T, Henkelman RM, Cusimano MD, Dirks PB: Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature. 2004, 432: 396-401. 10.1038/nature03128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gage FH, Coates PW, Palmer TD, Kuhn HG, Fisher LJ, Suhonen JO, Peterson DA, Suhr ST, Ray J: Survival and differentiation of adult neuronal progenitor cells transplanted to the adult brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 11879-11883. 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11879.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Goldman SA, Sim F: Neural progenitor cells of the adult brain. Novartis Found Symp. 2005, 265: 66-80. full_text. discussion 82-97View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds BA, Tetzlaff W, Weiss S: A multipotent EGF-responsive striatal embryonic progenitor cell produces neurons and astrocytes. J Neurosci. 1992, 12: 4565-4574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds BA, Weiss S: Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science. 1992, 255: 1707-1710. 10.1126/science.1553558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Llaguno SA, Chen J, Kwon CH, Parada LF: Neural and Cancer Stem Cells in Tumor Suppressor Mouse Models of Malignant Astrocytoma. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2008Google Scholar
- Calabrese C, Poppleton H, Kocak M, Hogg TL, Fuller C, Hamner B, Oh EY, Gaber MW, Finklestein D, Allen M, et al: A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2007, 11: 69-82. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bao S: Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006, 444: 756-760. 10.1038/nature05236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eramo A, Ricci-Vitiani L, Zeuner A, Pallini R, Lotti F, Sette G, Pilozzi E, Larocca LM, Peschle C, De Maria R: Chemotherapy resistance of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13: 1238-1241. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401872.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goings GE, Sahni V, Szele FG: Migration patterns of subventricular zone cells in adult mice change after cerebral cortex injury. Brain Res. 2004, 996: 213-226. 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.10.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barker FG, Chang SM, Gutin PH, Malec MK, McDermott MW, Prados MD, Wilson CB: Survival and functional status after resection of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Neurosurgery. 1998, 42: 709-720. 10.1097/00006123-199804000-00013. discussion 720-703View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL: Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001, 414: 105-111. 10.1038/35102167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chera BS, Amdur RJ, Patel P, Mendenhall WM: A radiation oncologist's guide to contouring the hippocampus. Am J Clin Oncol. 2009, 32: 20-22. 10.1097/COC.0b013e318178e4e8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barani IJ, Cuttino LW, Benedict SH, Todor D, Bump EA, Wu Y, Chung TD, Broaddus WC, Lin PS: Neural stem cell-preserving external-beam radiotherapy of central nervous system malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007, 68: 978-985.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan E, P M: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958, 54: 457-481. 10.2307/2281868.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cox D: Regression models and life table. J Royal Stat Soc B. 1972, 34: 187-220.Google Scholar
- Yang X, Darling JL, McMillan TJ, Peacock JH, Steel GG: Heterogeneity of radiosensitivity in a human glioma cell line. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992, 22: 103-108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Franceschi E, Sotti G, Frezza G, Amista P, Morandi L, Spagnolli F, Ermani M: Recurrence pattern after temozolomide concomitant with and adjuvant to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma: correlation With MGMT promoter methylation status. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 1275-1279. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4969.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tuettenberg J, Grobholz R, Seiz M, Brockmann MA, Lohr F, Wenz F, Vajkoczy P: Recurrence pattern in glioblastoma multiforme patients treated with anti-angiogenic chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009Google Scholar
- Barker N, Ridgway RA, van Es JH, van de Wetering M, Begthel H, van den Born M, Danenberg E, Clarke AR, Sansom OJ, Clevers H: Crypt stem cells as the cells-of-origin of intestinal cancer. Nature. 2009, 457: 608-611. 10.1038/nature07602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez-Caro M, Cobaleda C, Gonzalez-Herrero I, Vicente-Duenas C, Bermejo-Rodriguez C, Sanchez-Beato M, Orfao A, Pintado B, Flores T, Sanchez-Martin M, et al: Cancer induction by restriction of oncogene expression to the stem cell compartment. Embo J. 2009, 28: 8-20. 10.1038/emboj.2008.253.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alcantara Llaguno S, Chen J, Kwon CH, Jackson EL, Li Y, Burns DK, Alvarez-Buylla A, Parada LF: Malignant astrocytomas originate from neural stem/progenitor cells in a somatic tumor suppressor mouse model. Cancer Cell. 2009, 15: 45-56. 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.12.006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhu L, Gibson P, Currle DS, Tong Y, Richardson RJ, Bayazitov IT, Poppleton H, Zakharenko S, Ellison DW, Gilbertson RJ: Prominin 1 marks intestinal stem cells that are susceptible to neoplastic transformation. Nature. 2009, 457: 603-607. 10.1038/nature07589.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kakita A, Zerlin M, Takahashi H, Goldman JE: Some glial progenitors in the neonatal subventricular zone migrate through the corpus callosum to the contralateral cerebral hemisphere. J Comp Neurol. 2003, 458: 381-388. 10.1002/cne.10597.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laperriere N, Zuraw L, Cairncross G: Radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma in adults: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2002, 64: 259-273. 10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00078-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phillips TM, McBride WH, Pajonk F: The response of CD24(-/low)/CD44+ breast cancer-initiating cells to radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98: 1777-1785. 10.1093/jnci/djj495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Short SC, Mitchell SA, Boulton P, Woodcock M, Joiner MC: The response of human glioma cell lines to low-dose radiation exposure. Int J Radiat Biol. 1999, 75: 1341-1348. 10.1080/095530099139214.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beauchesne PD, Bertrand S, Branche R, Linke SP, Revel R, Dore JF, Pedeux RM: Human malignant glioma cell lines are sensitive to low radiation doses. Int J Cancer. 2003, 105: 33-40. 10.1002/ijc.11033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/384/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.