Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of imidazole derivatives on cellular proliferation and apoptosis in myeloid leukemia

BMC Cancer volume 24, Article number: 1200 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is the sub-type of Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) which is described by differentiation block at promyelocytic stage and t(15; 17) translocation with All trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) as standard treatments. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) translocation t (19; 22) causes a rise in granulocytes and their immature precursors in the blood. Different mutations cause resistance to first-line tyrosine kinase therapies in CML. Beside drug resistance, leukemia stem cells (LSC) are critical resources for relapse and resistance in APL and CML. The drug toxicity and resistant profile associated with LSC and current therapeutics of APL and CML necessitate the development of new therapies. Imidazoles are heterocyclic nitrogen compounds with diverse cellular actions. The purpose of this research was to assess the anti-leukemic properties of four novel imidazole derivatives including L-4, L-7, R-35, and R-NIM04.

Methods and results

Pharmacological and biochemical approaches were used which showed that all four imidazole derivatives interfere with the NB4 cells proliferation, an APL cell line, while only L-7 exhibit anti-proliferative activity against K562 cells, a CML cell line. The anti-proliferative effect of imidazole derivatives was linked to apoptosis induction. Further real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis revealed downregulation of AXL-Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (AXL-RTK) and target genes of Wnt/beta-catenin pathway like c-Myc, Axin2 and EYA3. An additive effect was observed after combinatorial treatment of L-7 with standard drugs ATRA or Imatinib on the proliferation of NB4 and K562 cells respectively which was related to further downregulation of target genes of Wnt/beta catenin pathway.

Conclusion

Imidazole derivatives significantly reduce proliferation of NB4 and K562 cells by inducing apoptosis, down regulating of AXL-RTK and Wnt/β-catenin target genes.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

APL is characterised by t(15; 17) and differentiation block at promyelocytic stage. APL accounts for approximately 10–15% of all AML cases. The t(15; 17) translocation results in leukemia-associated fusion protein (LAFP), PML-RARα [1, 2]. So far, ATRA, ATO and chemotherapy are the treatment options for newly diagnosed APL cases [3]. Clinically, ATRA and ATO have been useful for treatment of patients with low and intermediate risk APL. Patients having high risk APL are treated with ATRA, ATO and chemotherapy [4]. ATO alone or combined with either ATRA or chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplant was taken in consideration for relapsed APL. ATO alone achieved complete remission (CR) in 80% of relapsed patients. However, 10–20% of patients with relapsed APL are not sensitive to ATRA and ATO either alone or in combination. Despite the availability of standard treatment options, problems such as differentiation syndrome, treatment resistance, relapse, and premature death persist in APL [5, 6].

CML is a myeloproliferative disease that increases granulocytes and their immature precursors in the blood. CML involves t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) translocation, known as Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) which is a constitutive active kinase and causes increased proliferation by activation of downstream signalling [7, 8]. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard treatment options for chronic phase CML. Ponatinib, a third generation TKI targeting the T315I mutation, is used to treat CML if patients develop resistance to first-generation (Imatinib) and second-generation (nilotinib, dasatinib) inhibitors [9]. Furthermore, Imatinib and dasatinib are unable to target CML LSC, but ponatinib, a multikinase inhibitor can slightly interfere with CML LSCs [10]. Anyhow CML LSCs are still problem of relapse in CML.

Several studies reported that Wnt/β-catenin pathway play a pivotal role in cancer progression. It is well understood that activation of Wnt signaling leads to pathogenesis and maintain LSCs in AML and CML [11,12,13]. Since inhibition of Wnt signaling directly targets LSC, drugs and similar signaling pathways that can inhibit Wnt signaling offer significant potential within the setting of maintenance therapy for leukemia. Therefore, a small molecule that effectively inhibits Wnt/β catenin signaling might provide a desirable therapeutic option.

The side effects, drug toxicity, and resistance profiles associated with currently available anticancer therapeutics for APL and CML necessitate the development of novel anticancer drugs. Imidazoles are nitrogen-containing heterocyclic rings that exhibit various therapeutic properties and have anticancer potential as well [14]. These interesting anticancer properties of imidazole inspired the development of imidazole derivatives with the goal of reducing side effects and increasing treatment efficacy. This study was designed to assess the anti-cancer potential of imidazole derivatives against APL and CML cell lines.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and cell lines

K562 cell line was used as a model for BCR/ABL1 positive CML and NB4 for PML/RARα positive APL. The cell lines were obtained from our laboratory stock vials purchased from German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). RPMI 1640 media having 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco/Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S) and 1% L-glutamine was used to culture cell lines. Our collaborators provided imidazole derivatives, which were diluted in ethanol (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany). The stock solution was diluted to 1X assay concentrations. ATRA (Sigma Aldrich) was diluted in absolute ethanol according tomanufacturers instructions. Imatinib obtained from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA) was diluted in DMSO to 1000X stock which was further diluted to 1X working concentration for experiments.

Trypan blue exclusion assay

Trypan blue exclusion assay were carried out before MTT assay, to assess cell viability as mentioned [15].

MTT assay

The impact of imidazole derivatives on NB4 and K562 cells proliferation was cheked through MTT cell proliferation assay kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Approximately 10,000 cells were cultured in media containing 10% FBS 1 % P/S, 1 % L-glutamine and were plated in 96-well plates with or without inhibitors (alone or in combination) at the concentrations mentioned in Table 1. The cells were then incubated for 72 h. As a control, cells were plated in media containing    0.01% of solvent of the imidazole derivatives. After 72 h, cells were incubated with 15 μl of filter-sterilised MTT (5 mg dissolved in 1ml PBS) inside a CO2 incubator (Galaxy 170 R, New Brunswick) for 3–4 h at 37 °C. 150 µl of DMSO was added to dissolve crystals after careful removal of MTT medium from all wells without disturbing the crystals.  Before measuring the absorbance, the 96-well plate was incubated for 15 min. Using a micro-plate reader, absorbance was measured at reference wavelength of 550 nm and 660 nm (PR 4100 Bio-Rad). To analyze the data, the control/un-treated cells proliferation was used as a baseline (set to 1), while proliferation potential of the treated cells was shown relative to the baseline.

Table 1 Various ATRA, Imatinib and L-7 concentrations used in single targeting
Full size table

Extraction of RNA for gene expression analysis

Two million cells were treated with imidazole derivatives and incubated till the doubling time of the respective cell lines; a control was also taken the same way. The cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 1500 rpm. For total RNA extraction, the supernatant was gently removed and pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies)  and RNA was extracted following standard protocol. At room temperature, the obtained RNA pellet was air-dried in a laminar flow hood. The pallet was dissolved in 20 µl of NF water. Visual inspection of 2% agarose gel electrophoresis bands determined RNA quality. The extracted RNA was quantified through a Nanodrop-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and RNA purity was assessed by calculating the 260/280 ratio. RNA was then stored at -80 °C till future processing.

Synthesis of cDNA

1 µg of RNA template was used to synthesize complementary DNA (cDNA) using the WizBio cDNA Synthesis Kit, as per manufacturer’s instructions and the quality of synthesized cDNA was verified. Primers were optimized for the housekeeping gene β-actin, as well as for AXL-RTK, EYA3, and c-Myc, using standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols.

Table 2 Key considerations for primer design in gene amplification
Full size table

Analysis of gene expression

To explore the gene expression at the transcriptional level, a real -time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (qPCR; Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany 7300) was used. SYBR Green master mix (5X) was utilized for qRT-PCR (Solis BioDyne). The qRT-PCR program included an initial cycle of 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of amplification for 10 s at 95 °C and afterwards 60 °C for 1 min. Table 2 contain the primers sequences used to express the aforementioned genes in NB4 and K562 cells. The Ct values were exported to Microsoft Excel worksheet for analysis of the fold chain according to comparative Ct method of calculating fold changes. The target genes expression was normalised to endogenous β-actin gene given by 2-∆∆Ct .

Apoptosis analysis

To assess apoptosis, DNA fragmentation assay was performed on K562 and NB4 cells seeded in a 6-well plates and treated with inhibitors. After 72 h incubation, DNA isolation was carried out using the method described [16]. The pellet was air-dried approximately for 30 min, followed by resuspension in 40 µl of NF water and then quantified through a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). For gel electrophoresis, equal amounts of DNA were loaded into wells on a 1.5% agarose gel which was examined using UV transilluminator [16].

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was carried out in triplicates, both technically and biologically. The findings were tabulated as mean +/- standard deviation. Data was analysed through One-way ANOVA and Student t-test using GraphPad Prism5 (GraphPad Software Inc. San Diego, CA) with p-value less than 0.05 considered as significant.

Results

Apoptosis induction by imidazole derivatives leads to a notable reduction in the expansion of NB4 and K562 cell lines.

Imidazole has been shown to have anticancer potential [17,18,19], therefore present study was aimed to explore the antiproliferative effect of imidazole derivatives in NB4 and K562 cells. For this reason, cells were treated with increasing concentrations (0, 1.25, 2.5 and 5 µM) of L4, L7, R-35 and R-NIMO4. Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were evaluated using MTT assay. Either ethanol or DMSO served as a solvent control. We observed that imidazole derivative, L-7 causes a significant reduction in NB4 cell growth in a dose-dependent pattern (Fig. 1A) while R-35 and R-NIMO4 showed a slight effect on NB4 cells (Fig. 1B and C). Similarly, K562 cells also exhibited a significant reduction in proliferation by L-7 in dose dependent manner as shown in (Fig. 1D). R-35 and R-NIMO4 have slightly reduced the proliferation of K562 cells (Fig. 1E and F). L4 showed a slight effect on NB4 cells (Sup Fig. 1A) and no effect on K562 cells (Sup Fig. 1B). To evaluate, whether the anti-proliferative potential of imidazole derivatives on NB4 and K562 cells is associated with apoptosis induction, these cells were exposed to imidazole derivatives for 72 h and DNA fragmentation assay was performed to evaluate apoptosis. L4 and L7 were observed to induce apoptosis in NB4 cells (Sup Fig. 2A) while L7 induced apoptosis in K562 cells (Sup Fig. 2B).

Overall, our results demonstrate that imidazole derivatives reduce the proliferation of NB4 and K562 cells by inducing apoptosis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of imidazole derivatives on proliferation potential of NB4 and K562 cells through MTT assay. (A) L-7 effect on NB4 cells (B) R-35 effect on NB4 cells. (C) R-NIMO4 effect on NB4 cells. (D) L-7 effect on K562 cells. (E) R-35 effect on K562 cells. (F) R-NIMO4 effect on K562 cells. Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (10% FBS, 1% P/S1% L-glutamine), 0.01% ethanol, and the indicated concentrations of L7. One-Way ANOVA was used to test statistical significance (statistically highly significant p-values are < 0.001). Mean ± SEM are represented by bars. * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001

Full size image

Comparison of the anti-proliferative activity of imidazole derivatives with ATRA or Imatinib in NB4 and K562 cells respectively

ATRA and Imatinib are standard drugs used in treatment of APL and CML respectively. We have shown that imidazole derivative L-7 reduce proliferation of NB4 and K562 cells independently, therefore we compared the antiproliferative effects of imidazole derivatives with ATRA in NB4 and Imatinib in K562 cell lines. For this purpose, NB4 cells were treated with ATRA or L-7, L-4, R-35, R-NIMO4 and K562 cells with Imatinib or L-7 as shown in (Fig. 2 and Sup Fig. 3A, B and C), and MTT assay was performed. From Fig. 2A, the results indicate that L-7 showed strong effects as compared to ATRA while other L-4, R-35 and R-NIMO3 showed less effect as compared to ATRA in NB4 cells (Sup Fig. 3A, B and C). Similarly, L-7 showed stronger effect as compared to Imatinib in K562 cells.

Taken together our results showed that L-7 has stronger antiproliferative effect on NB4 and K562 cell lines as compared to ATRA and Imatinib.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of antiproliferative activity between L-7 and ATRA, L-7 and Imatinib. (A). Comparison between L7 and ATRA on NB4 cells (B), Comparison between L7 and imatinib on K562 cells. Cells were cultered in RPMI 1640 medium (10% FBS, 1% P/S, 1% L-glutamine), 0.01% ethanol, and the given concentrations of L7, ATRA and Imatinib. MTT assay was performed after 72 h to evaluate cell proliferation.

Full size image

Combinatorial targeting of NB4 cells with L-7 and ATRA and K562 cells with L-7 and Imatinib show additive anti-proliferative effect

Our findings demonstrate that L-7 significantly reduces the proliferation of NB4 and K562 cells. ATRA and Imatinib are approved drugs for APL and CML and interefere with proliferation of NB4 and K562 cells respectively. To minimize the side effects of ATRA and Imatinib, we were interested to study combinatorial effects of imidazole derivatives and ATRA on NB4 cells and imidazole derivatives and Imatinib on K562 cells.  NB4 cells were treated with the given concentrations of ATRA or imidazole derivatives (alone or in combination) as shown in (Fig. 3A and Sup Table 1) and performed MTT assay. We found that both ATRA and L-7 reduced NB4 cells proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion whereas combined treatment showed an additive antiproliferative effect (Fig. 3A). However, L-4, R-35 and R-NIMO4 could not show any additive antiproliferative effect on NB4 cells (Sup Fig. 4A, B and C). Similarly, Imatinib and L-7 both reduced the proliferation of K562 cell line in a dose-dependent manner while combined treatment further reduced the proliferation of K562 cells and showed additive antiproliferative effect (Fig. 3B).

In conclusion, our findings suggest that combination of ATRA and L-7 effectively inhibits NB4 cells, while combination of Imatinib and L-7 can effectively inhibits K562 cells proliferation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Single and combined treatments Effect on NB4 cells with L7 and ATRA (A) and K562 cells with L7and imatinib (B). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (10% FBS, 1% P/S, 1% L-glutamine), 0.01% Ethanol, and given concentrations of L7, ATRA and Imatinib. MTT assay was performed after 72 h to measure cell proliferation

Full size image

Imidazole derivatives interfere with Wnt/beta catenin signalling in NB4 and K562 cells

Wnt β-catenin oncogenic signaling is indispensable for PML/RAR alpha and BCR/ABL induced leukemogenesis. Recently we and others have shown that AXL-RTK regulate Wnt signaling in APL and CML [20] and our results suggest that imidazole derivatives interfere with leukemogenic potential of PML/RAR alpha and BCR/ABL1, therefore we were interested to explore AXL-RTK expression and Wnt signaling in APL and CML. Cells were plated and treated with given concentrations of imidazole derivatives. After 72 h RNA was extracted, and cDNA was synthesized. The Wnt target genes (c-Myc and Axin2) expression was assessed through RT-PCR. AXL-RTK was down regulated in NB4 and K562 cells as shown in Fig. 4A and B respectively, which in turn down regulated Wnt target genes (c-Myc) in NB4 and K562 cells (Fig. 5C, D), Axin2 in K562 cells (Sup Fig. 6D). EYA3 gene serves as a transcriptional regulator and co-activator of PP2A, which is a important cellular Ser/Thr phosphatase and involved in Wnt signalling by stabilizing c-Myc. Therefore EYA3 gene expression in NB4 cells and K562 cells was investigated [18]. Expression of EYA3 was assessed using RT-PCR. All imidazole derivatives reduced the expression of EYA 3 in NB4 cells except R-NIMO4 (Sup Fig. 5). Further single targeting of NB4 cells with L-7 was able to reduce significantly the expression of c-Myc and completely downregulated EYA3 and combined targeting of NB4 cells with ATRA and L-7 showed the same results (Sup Fig. 6A and B). Similarly, treatment of K562 cells either with Imatinib or L-7 reduces the c-Myc, aAxin2and EYA3 expression but co-targeting with Imatinib + L-7 results in further expression reduction of c-Myc, Axin2 and EYA3 (Sup Fig. 6C, D and E).

In summary we can conclude that L-7 interfere with Wnt/beta-catenin cellular signalling in NB4 and K562 cells by reducing the expression of AXL-RTK, c-Myc, Axin 2 and EYA3.

Fig. 4
figure 4

AXL-RTK and c-Myc Expression in NB4 and K562 cells after treatment with L4, L7, R-35, R-NIM04 and Imatinib. Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (10% FBS, 1% P/S, 1% L-glutamine) 0.01% ethanol, and the indicated concentrations of L7, L4, R35 and R-NIM04. Expression analysis was done through RT-PCR for NB4 cells (A and C) K562 cells (B and D). One way Anova was used to measure statistical significance. (statistically significant p-values are < 0.05). Mean ± SEM is represented as bars. *** p-value < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

The goal of current study was to evaluate the anti-cancer activity of four imidazole derivatives L7, L4, R-35, and R-NIM04 against NB4 and K562 cell lines. Pharmacological and biochemical testing showed that all four compounds have anti-proliferative activity against NB4, while only L7 has the ability to reduce cellular proliferation in K562. The DNA fragmentation assay revealed that reduction in proliferation of NB4 and K562 cells is due to induction of apoptosis [19]. It was also observed that the combination treatments (L7 + ATRA) and (L7 + imatinib) had an additive effect on NB4 and K562 cell proliferation. Further, we could show that imidazole derivatives either alone or in combination with ATRA or imatinib reduce expression of AXL-RTK and interfere with Wnt signalling by down regulating c-Myc, Axin2 and EYA3 in NB4 and K562 cells.

Imidazoles are nitrogen-containing heterocyclic rings that are found in a variety of bioactive compounds and exhibit a variety of therapeutic properties including anticancer [13], antiviral [22], antibacterial [23], antiepileptic [24] and antifungal activities [25]. Several anti-cancer drugs, including fludarabine phosphate, dacarbazine, nilotinib, and ponatinib, have imidazole as a structural component [26]. Biochemical and pharmacological testing of imidazole derivatives show that all four compounds strongly interfere with the APL cell line (NB4) proliferation; while only L7 exhibit anti-proliferative activity against CML cell line (K562). The hallmarks of cancer include uncontrolled proliferation, angiogenesis and evasion of apoptosis. The loss of apoptotic control enables cancer cells to deregulate proliferation and interfere with differentiation [27]. Targeting and activating an apoptotic pathway in cancer cells could lead to a more universal treatment approach. Our findings suggest that imidazole derivatives induce apoptosis in NB4 and K562 cell lines which is in accordance with previous findings that different imidazole derivatives induce apoptosis in various cancers [28, 29].

AXL-RTK has been found to have a role in chemotherapy resistance in different cancers including ovarian cancer [30] and AML [31]. We have found that AXL-RTK is down regulated by imidazole derivatives and highlights importance of imidazole derivatives in resistant and refractory AML. Recent findings in breast cancer suggest that knockdown leads to a decrease in nuclear β-catenin whereas AXL stimulation by Gas6 dramatically raised β-catenin levels and triggered its nuclear translocation demonstrating AXL-RTK involvement in both the development of cancer and the stabilization of β-catenin [20, 32,33,34]. Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway is crucial in the maintenance of LSCs in the AML and CML. Our study revealed that imidazole derivatives downregulate AXL-RTK, which is related to downregulation of target genes of Wnt/β-catenin pathway, like c-Myc and Axin2. This suggests that AXL-RTK is involved in modulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in APL and CML. EYA3 gene is member of a unique proteins family with dual functions like as co-activators for transcription and haloacid dehalogenase-like Tyr phosphatases. These proteins have different functions including cells proliferation and migration, invasion, and metastasis. The activity of EYA3 as ser/thr phosphatase is not intrinsic but linked to PP2A [35]. EYA3 stabilizes c-Myc by utilizing the phosphatase activity of PP2A, a major Wnt signalling regulator. Previous research has shown that β-catenin physically interacts with HIF-1α at target gene sites and promotes HIF-1α-mediated transcription through a mechanism that is not fully understood [36]. Recent findings suggest that HIF-1 and 2 are required for the expression of EYA3 (Yang C et al., 2022). Our findings suggest that imidazole derivatives down regulate HIF-1α expression (data not shown), and except R-NIM04, all other imidazole derivatives/compounds showed significant decrease in c-Myc, Axin2, EYA3 expression (Fig. 4, Sup Figs. 5 and 6) which may further confirm interference of imidazole derivatives with Wnt signalling. However, we showed that imidazole derivatives interefere with Wnt/beta catenin pathway, the exact machanism needs to be further explored. We investigated the role of imidazole derivatives in leukemic cell lines, further validation is required through primary samples of APL and CML patients and in in-vivo models. These imidazole derivatives have potential to contribute to the development of effective therapies for APL and CML in the future.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that imidazole derived compounds have the potential to decrease the proliferation ability of NB4 as well as K562 cells by down regulating AXL-RTK and by interfering with β-catenin dependent signalling in APL and CML.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Abbreviations

APL:

Acute promyelocytic leukemia

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

CML:

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

AXL-RTK:

Receptor tyrosine kinase

ATRA:

All trans retinoic acid

ATO:

Arsenic trioxide

LSC:

Leukemia stem cells

RT-PCR:

Real time polymerase chain reaction

LEAP:

Leukemia-associated fusion proteins

References

  1. Jimenez JJ, Chale RS, Abad AC, Schally AV. Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): a review of the literature. Oncotarget. 2020;11(11):992.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tallman MS, Altman JK. Curative strategies in acute promyelocytic leukemia. ASH Educ Program Book. 2008;2008(1):391–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu HH. The history of the chemo-free model in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Front Oncol. 2020;10:592996.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Stahl M, Tallman MS. Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): remaining challenges towards a cure for all. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60(13):3107–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding W, Li YP, Nobile LM, Grills G, Carrera I, Paietta E, Tallman MS, Wiernik PH, Gallagher RE. Leukemic Cellular Retinoic Acid resistance and missense mutations in the PML-RAR Fusion Gene after Relapse of Acute promyelocytic leukemia from treatment with all-trans retinoic acid and intensive chemotherapy. Blood. J Am Soc Hematol. 1998;92(4):1172–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yilmaz M, Kantarjian H, Ravandi F. Acute promyelocytic leukemia current treatment algorithms. Blood cancer J. 2021;11(6):123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Acar K, Uz B. A chronic myeloid leukemia case with a variant translocation t (11; 22)(q23; q11. 2): masked Philadelphia or simple variant translocation? Pan Afr Med J. 2018;30.

  8. Turner SD, Alexander DR. What have we learnt from mouse models of NPM-ALK-induced lymphomagenesis? Leukemia. 2005;19(7):1128–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deininger MW, O’brien SG, Ford JM, Druker BJ. Practical management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving imatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(8):1637–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka Y, Fukushima T, Mikami K, Adachi K, Fukuyama T, Goyama S, Kitamura T. Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on a mouse chronic myeloid leukemia model and chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Exp Hematol. 2020;90:46–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heidel FH, Bullinger L, Feng Z, Wang Z, Neff TA, Stein L, et al. Genetic and pharmacologic inhibition of β-catenin targets imatinib-resistant leukemia stem cells in CML. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10(4):412–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Y, Krivtsov AV, Sinha AU, North TE, Goessling W, Feng Z, et al. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is required for the development of leukemia stem cells in AML. Science. 2010;327(5973):1650–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang X, Zhao Y, Smith C, Gasparetto M, Turhan A, Eaves A, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells possess multiple unique features of resistance to BCR-ABL targeted therapies. Leukemia. 2007;21(5):926–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ali I, Lone MN, Aboul-Enein HY. Imidazoles as potential anticancer agents. MedChemComm. 2017;8(9):1742–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mian AA, Schüll M, Zhao Z, Oancea C, Hundertmark A, Beissert T, et al. The gatekeeper mutation T315I confers resistance against small molecules by increasing or restoring the ABL-kinase activity accompanied by aberrant transphosphorylation of endogenous BCR, even in loss-of-function mutants of BCR/ABL. Leukemia. 2009;23(9):1614–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saadat YR, Saeidi N, Vahed SZ, Barzegari A, Barar J. An update to DNA ladder assay for apoptosis detection. BioImpacts: BI. 2015;5(1):25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma GV, Ramesh A, Singh A, Srikanth G, Jayaram V, Duscharla D, Jun JH, Ummanni R, Malhotra SV. Imidazole derivatives show anticancer potential by inducing apoptosis and cellular senescence. MedChemComm. 2014;5(11):1751–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu F, Zhang L, Nandakumar KS, Cheng K. Imidazole scaffold based compounds in the development of therapeutic drugs. Curr Top Med Chem. 2021;21(28):2514–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang DL, Zhang YJ, Lei J, Li SQ, He LJ, Tang DY, Xu C, Zhang LT, Wen J, Lin HK, Li HY. Discovery of fused benzimidazole-imidazole autophagic flux inhibitors for treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;240:114565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fatima M, Kakar SJ, Adnan F, Khan K, Mian AA, Khan D. AXL receptor tyrosine kinase: a possible therapeutic target in acute promyelocytic leukemia. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu Y, Zeng J, Zhang F, Zhu Z, Qi T, Zheng Z, et al. Integrative analysis of omics summary data reveals putative mechanisms underlying complex traits. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):918.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhan P, Liu X, Zhu J, Fang Z, Li Z, Pannecouque C, De Clercq E. Synthesis and biological evaluation of imidazole thioacetanilides as novel non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009;17(16):5775–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rani N, Sharma A, Singh R. Imidazoles as promising scaffolds for antibacterial activity: a review. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2013;13(12):1812–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mishra R, Ganguly S. Imidazole as an anti-epileptic: an overview. Med Chem Res. 2012;21:3929–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rani N, Sharma A, Kumar Gupta G, Singh R. Imidazoles as potential antifungal agents: a review. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2013;13(11):1626–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma P, LaRosa C, Antwi J, Govindarajan R, Werbovetz KA. Imidazoles as potential anticancer agents: an update on recent studies. Molecules. 2021;26(14):4213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hassan M, Watari H, AbuAlmaaty A, Ohba Y, Sakuragi N. [Retracted] apoptosis and Molecular Targeting Therapy in Cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014(1):150845.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharma BN, Marschall M, Henriksen S, Rinaldo CH. Antiviral effects of artesunate on polyomavirus BK replication in primary human kidney cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(1):279–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Z, Li ZX, Zhao WC, Huang HB, Wang JQ, Zhang H, Lu JY, Wang RN, Li W, Cheng Z, Xu WL. Identification and characterization of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) as a functional target of marine natural product grincamycin B. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021;42(5):801–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kanlikilicer P, Ozpolat B, Aslan B, Bayraktar R, Gurbuz N, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, Bayraktar E, Denizli M, Gonzalez-Villasana V, Ivan C, Lokesh GL. Therapeutic targeting of AXL receptor tyrosine kinase inhibits tumor growth and intraperitoneal metastasis in ovarian cancer models. Mol Therapy-Nucleic Acids. 2017;9:251–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Auyez A, Sayan AE, Kriajevska M, Tulchinsky E. AXL receptor in cancer metastasis and drug resistance: when normal functions go askew. Cancers. 2021;13(19):4864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Clevers H. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell. 2006;127(3):469–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Polakis P. Wnt signaling in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(5):a008052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Anastas JN, Moon RT. WNT signalling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(1):11–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang L, Zhou H, Li X, Vartuli RL, Rowse M, Xing Y, Rudra P, Ghosh D, Zhao R, Ford HL. Eya3 partners with PP2A to induce c-Myc stabilization and tumor progression. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaidi A, Williams AC, Paraskeva C. Interaction between β-catenin and HIF-1 promotes cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(2):210–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None declared.

Funding

The study was supported by a grant from Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (No: 21–1826/SRGP/R&D/HEC/2018) to Dilawar Khan Ph.D.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Bazla Binte Nadeem and Aysha Bibi contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedicine, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Bazla Binte Nadeem, Aysha Bibi, Mudassir Khan, Gul Rukh Sajjad & Dilawar Khan

  2. Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Fazal Adnan

  3. Department of Chemistry, University of Wah, Wah Cantt, Pakistan

    Zaheer Ahmad

Authors
  1. Bazla Binte Nadeem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aysha Bibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mudassir Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gul Rukh Sajjad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fazal Adnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zaheer Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dilawar Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: D.K.; Development of methodology, B.B.N., A.B., M.K., G.R.S & D.K; Acquisition of data B.B.N. & A.B; Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): B.B.N., A.B., F.A., Z.A., D.K.; Writing Original Draft: B.B.N., A.B., M.K. & D.K.; Writing-Review and Editing: Z.A., F.A., D.K.; Study supervision: D.K.; Performed experiments: B.B.N., A.B; Others: B.B.N., A.B., M.K. Z.A., F.A., & D.K., Funding Ac-quisition: D.K. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilawar Khan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Protein sequences

Not applicable.

DNA and RNA sequences

Not applicable.

DNA and RNA sequencing data

Not applicable.

Genetic polymorphisms

Not applicable.

Linked genotype and phenotype data

Not applicable.

Macromolecular structure

Not applicable.

Microarray data (must be MIAME compliant)

Not applicable.

Crystallographic data for small molecules

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nadeem, B.B., Bibi, A., Khan, M. et al. Effects of imidazole derivatives on cellular proliferation and apoptosis in myeloid leukemia. BMC Cancer 24, 1200 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12958-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12958-4

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us