- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Salvage radiotherapy for locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma: clinical outcomes and toxicities
BMC Cancer volume 24, Article number: 871 (2024)
Abstract
Background
The management of locally recurrent gynecological carcinoma remains a challenge due to the limited availability of data. This study aims to share our institutional experience in using definitive radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma.
Methods
The study retrospectively reviewed 20 patients in our hospital completing salvage 3D image-based HDR brachytherapy, with or without EBRT, for locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma after surgery. The Kaplan–Meier method was applied to estimate the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The toxicities were assessed by CTCAEv5.
Results
During a median observation period of 21 months, the study reported a tumor objective response rate of 95%. The 3-year DFS and OS rates were 89.4% and 90.9%, respectively. The EBRT combined with brachytherapy achieved a median cumulative dose of 88 Gy to CTV D90. 14 patients received concurrent and/or systemic chemotherapy. Two patients suffered locoregional recurrence after salvage treatment, one of whom only received salvage brachytherapy for prior RT history. The analysis identified significant predictors for DFS, including tumor histology and FIGO stage. 5 patients observed acute grade 1–2 rectal (15%) or genitourinary (10%) toxicities. Late toxicities including grade 1–2 rectal bleeding (10%) and grade 2 pelvic fracture (5%) were seen in 3 patients.
Conclusions
3D image-guided brachytherapy combined with EBRT shows effective tumor control and acceptable toxicity profile for women with locally recurrent gynecologic cancer. The success in managing vaginal recurrence is notably influenced by histologic subtype and FIGO staging.
Introduction
Cervical cancer and endometrial cancer are the two main tumor types in gynecological oncology, with a long-term high incidence and mortality [1]. In many low-income and middle-income countries, cervical cancer shows slowly reduced or even increased incidence and mortality, which results in heavy health and economic burden [2, 3]. Meanwhile, endometrial cancer demonstrates a continued rise in incidence worldwide and has the fastest increasing morbidity in women [1, 4]. For patients with early-stage disease, radical surgery is recommended, and subsequent adjuvant treatment is determined according to the pathology. While there are still approximately 5-10% of patients suffered postoperative locoregional recurrence [5,6,7,8]. Considering the feasibility of surgical resection, definitive radiotherapy (RT) involving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy is more widely used for locally recurrent patients without previous RT history. After treatment for relapse, long-term disease-free survival rates of approximately 40-70% have been reported in some situations [9,10,11].
Recently, advances in radiotherapy have achieved superior dosimetric outcomes and reduced toxicity. Application of 3D image-guided brachytherapy, especially interstitial brachytherapy, facilitates a higher dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) while minimizing the dose to adjacent organs at risk (OARs) [12, 13]. Herein, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes and toxicities of twenty patients with postoperative localized recurrence of gynecological tumors after undergoing 3D image-based high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy with (or without) EBRT and chemotherapy. We also evaluated the prognostic factors associated with outcomes after salvage therapy to help understand the disease development and make individualized therapies.
Methods and materials
Study design
All patients treated in our hospital from October 2020 to September 2023 for locally recurrent cervical or endometrial cancer after surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria include: (1) pathologically confirmed vaginal recurrence with no evidence of distant metastasis; (2) finishing HDR-brachytherapy delivered in at least four fractions, with or without external beam radiotherapy. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital.
Treatment modalities for recurrence
For patients without prior pelvic radiation, definitive RT consisted of EBRT with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D image-based HDR brachytherapy was applied. If the patients have completed postoperative pelvic EBRT before, only brachytherapy was applied. Moreover, concurrent cisplatin (40mg/m2, weekly) and/or systemic therapy involving platinum and paclitaxel chemotherapy were also performed based on the physical status of patients during treatment. EBRT was up to a dose of 45–50.4 Gy to the entire vagina plus pelvic lymph nodes at 1.8 Gy per fraction in 25–28 fractions. The CTV for EBRT encompasses the gross tumor, entire vagina, and pelvic lymph nodes including the common iliac, external iliac, internal iliac, obturator, and presacral nodal. Inguinal lymph nodes were also involved for distal vaginal lesions. As to the patients with vaginal plus lymph node recurrence, IMRT delivered a simultaneous integrated boost to 61.6 Gy at 2.2 Gy per fraction to the involved lymph nodes. After EBRT, the patients received image-based HDR brachytherapy at a dose of 24–35 Gy to the vaginal recurrence at 4–6 Gy per fraction in 4–6 fractions. Intracavity brachytherapy by ovoids or cylinder and/or interstitial brachytherapy by free-hand needles was chosen according to patients and tumor anatomy, referring to the extent of disease on pretreatment CT or MRI imaging. All brachytherapy fractions were individually optimized to the CTV with 3-dimensional CT-based planning. The high-risk CTV for brachytherapy involves the residual tumor and entire vaginal surface. Radiation was delivered using an after-loaded 192Ir source in two fractions per week.
Follow-up and statistical analysis
Outcome measures of disease status included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). DFS was defined as the time from the start of the salvage radiation therapy to the last follow-up attendance or any disease recurrence. OS was defined as the time from the start of salvage radiation therapy to the last follow-up attendance or death from any cause. Besides, we assessed and recorded the treatment-related toxicities by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (CTCAEv5). Cumulative DFS and OS were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate survival curve comparisons were performed by the log-rank test to identify prognostic factors for outcomes. All statistical analyses were carried out with GraphPad v9.4.0.
Results
Patients and treatment characteristics
A total of twenty patients were reviewed and analyzed. The median age of patients undergoing initial surgery was 55 years (range 32–75). Cervical cancer was the predominant cancer type (n = 17). According to the surgical histology, most lesions were precancerous or early-stage cancer (FIGO I). One patient received postoperative pelvic EBRT at a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and concurrent nedaplatin at 40 mg weekly for 5 cycles as adjuvant treatment. Besides, three patients accepted adjuvant platinum and paclitaxel chemotherapy alone for 2–3 cycles after surgery. More characteristics of patients and initial therapy are presented in Table 1.
The median time from primary hysterectomy to vaginal recurrence was 40.5 months (range 10.0–117.0) (Fig. 1). 80% of recurrences (n = 16) were limited to the vagina, the rest (n = 4) involved both vagina and pelvic or inguinal lymph nodes. Except for one patient who only received salvage brachytherapy because of previous RT history, all other patients (n = 19) received definitive RT involving pelvic EBRT and 3D image-guided HDR vaginal brachytherapy. Based on patient anatomy and the residual tumor size and extension, 55% of patients (n = 11) had intracavity brachytherapy, 35% of patients (n = 7) had interstitial brachytherapy, and the rest (n = 2) had hybrid brachytherapy including both. The salvage radiation treatment achieved a median dose of 88 Gy to 90% clinical target volume (D90) in the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). The cumulative dose of CTV D90 was above 75 Gy in all patients except one only receiving brachytherapy. Along with radiotherapy, concurrent cisplatin and/or systemic therapy was performed in 70% of patients (n = 14). The other details of the salvage treatment are listed in Table 2.
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors
After salvage treatment, the objective response rate was 95%. With a median follow-up time of 21 months (range: 3–38), the 3-year DFS and OS were 89.4% and 90.9%, respectively (Fig. 2A-B). Two patients (10%) had locoregional recurrence at 6 and 8 months after salvage treatment, and one of them only received salvage brachytherapy because of prior pelvic RT history. No distant failure was found during the follow-up.
On univariate analysis for disease control, histology of cervical cancer, FIGO stage after initial surgery were significantly prognostic for DFS (Table 3, all p ≤ 0.005). Patients with cervical adenocarcinoma (ADC), higher FIGO stage showed worse outcomes after salvage therapy (Fig. 3A-B). Meanwhile, age at recurrence, the interval between initial surgery and recurrence, tumor grade, pelvic nodal recurrence, brachytherapy type, and chemotherapy use had no predictive value for DFS (Table 3, all p > 0.1).
Treatment-related toxicity
There was no acute grade 3 or higher toxicity observed. 15% of patients (n = 3) had acute grade 1–2 rectal toxicities characterized by diarrhea or rectal hemorrhage. Other 10% of patients (n = 2) had acute grade 1–2 cystitis or urinary tract pain. Late toxicities, including grade 1–2 rectal hemorrhage (10%) and grade 2 pelvic fracture (5%, hairline fracture), were observed in three patients.
Discussion
In this cohort of 20 patients with vaginal recurrence of cervical or endometrial cancer, salvage image-guided HDR brachytherapy with or without EBRT resulted in excellent tumor control and overall survival. The local failure rate was 10%. The 3-year DFS and OS were 89.4% and 90.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, the patients did not experience severe toxicities after salvage treatment. Only grade 1–2 acute or late gastrointestinal, genitourinary toxicities and pelvic insufficiency fracture were observed during the follow-up.
The patients in our cohort showed better survival outcomes than those reported in other studies [10, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. For patients with local recurrence who received salvage brachytherapy with or without EBRT, the 3-year DFS and OS were approximately 34-55% and 57-75%, respectively [17, 18, 20]. While for those who completed both EBRT and brachytherapy, the 3-year DFS and OS increased to 68–75% and 67–80%, respectively [10, 15, 19]. In our study, most patients (95%) received EBRT and sequential brachytherapy. More importantly, the median cumulative dose to CTV D90 (88 Gy, EQD2) was higher than that in previous reports (70–82 Gy, EQD2) [10, 11, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20], which accounted for the better outcomes. During the follow-up, none of the patients suffered distant metastasis, which might be attributed to the use of concurrent and /or systemic chemotherapy.
Analysis of prognostic factors associated with DFS demonstrated cervical ADC, relatively advanced tumor stage (FIGO II-III) predicted worse outcomes after salvage treatment. It has been reported that patients with ADC had a poorer prognosis than squamous cell carcinoma in the uterine cervix [21, 22]. Our finding reconfirmed that ADC was a significant prognostic factor affecting relapse-free survival of patients with locally recurrent cervical cancer. The prognostic role of the FIGO stage was consistent with prior studies [10, 15].
In the present study, with a median dose delivery of 88 Gy prescribed to CTV, no patients suffered grade 3 or higher toxicities. The median D2cc for the bladder, rectum, and bowel were 64.6 Gy, 62.4 Gy and 52.2 Gy, respectively. According to the dose constraint recommended by ASTRO clinical practice guideline [23], ideal dose constraints for the bladder, rectum, and bowel were achieved in 100%, 60%, and 95% of the patients in the study. No one had the dose of OARs exceeded the maximum dose constraints. Limitations of this study included its retrospective nature and small sample size, which resulted in the preclusion of multivariate analysis. Nevertheless, our data contributed to the limited number of related series in the literature, as well as shared our institutional experience in exploring treatment modalities and dose prescriptions for treating isolated vaginal recurrence.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study indicates that image-guided brachytherapy combined with EBRT could achieve favorable tumor control and tolerable treatment-related toxicities in patients with locoregionally recurrent gynecological cancer. Tumor histology and FIGO stage revealed prognostic value for clinical outcomes.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21820.
He WQ, Li C. Recent global burden of cervical cancer incidence and mortality, predictors, and temporal trends. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;163(3):583–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.075.
Singh D, Vignat J, Lorenzoni V, Eslahi M, Ginsburg O, Lauby-Secretan B, Arbyn M, Basu P, Bray F, Vaccarella S. Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: a baseline analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(2):e197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00501-0.
Giaquinto AN, Broaddus RR, Jemal A, Siegel RL. The changing Landscape of Gynecologic Cancer Mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(3):440–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004676.
Uppal S, Gehrig PA, Peng K, Bixel KL, Matsuo K, Vetter MH, Davidson BA, Cisa MP, Lees BF, Brunette LL, et al. Recurrence rates in patients with cervical Cancer treated with Abdominal Versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional Retrospective Review study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(10):1030–40. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.03012.
Zhang YF, Fan Y, Zhang P, Ruan JY, Mu Y, Li JK. Cervical Cancer recurrence and patient Survival after Radical Hysterectomy followed by either adjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant Radiotherapy with Optional Concurrent Chemotherapy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2022;12823064. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.823064.
Siegenthaler F, Lindemann K, Epstein E, Rau TT, Nastic D, Ghaderi M, Rydberg F, Mueller MD, Carlson J, Imboden S. Time to first recurrence, pattern of recurrence, and survival after recurrence in endometrial cancer according to the molecular classification. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;165(2):230–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.024.
Akesson A, Adok C, Dahm-Kahler P. Recurrence and survival in endometrioid endometrial cancer - a population-based cohort study. Gynecol Oncol. 2023;168:127–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.11.012.
Thomas GM, Dembo AJ, Myhr T, Black B, Pringle JF, Rawlings G. Long-term results of concurrent radiation and chemotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix recurrent after surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1993;3(4):193–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.1993.03040193.x.
Chapman CH, Maghsoudi K, Littell RD, Chen LM, Hsu IC. Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for isolated vaginal recurrences of endometrial cancer with no prior adjuvant therapy. Brachytherapy. 2017;16(6):1152–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2017.07.002.
Engineer R, Chopra S, Shukla R, Mahantshetty U, Phurailatpam R, Ghadi Y, Gupta S, Shrivastava SK. Computed tomography-based interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent cervical carcinoma in the vaginal apex. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022;34(1):e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.012.
Mahantshetty U, Shrivastava S, Kalyani N, Banerjee S, Engineer R, Chopra S. Template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in gynecologic cancers: a single institutional experience. Brachytherapy. 2014;13(4):337–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2013.09.009.
Itami J, Murakami N, Watanabe M, Sekii S, Kasamatsu T, Kato S, Hirowatari H, Ikushima H, Ando K, Ohno T, et al. Combined interstitial and Intracavitary High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy of Cervical Cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11809825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.809825.
Fokdal L, Ortoft G, Hansen ES, Rohl L, Pedersen EM, Tanderup K, Lindegaard JC. Toward four-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally recurrent endometrial cancer. Brachytherapy. 2014;13(6):554–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2014.06.004.
Vargo JA, Kim H, Houser CJ, Berhane H, Sukumvanich P, Olawaiye AB, Kelley JL, Edwards RP, Comerci JT, Huang M, et al. Definitive salvage for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer: the impact of modern intensity-modulated-radiotherapy with image-based HDR brachytherapy and the interplay of the PORTEC 1 risk stratification. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113(1):126–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.08.038.
Huang K, D’Souza D, Patil N, Velker V, Leung E, Stitt L, Whiston F, Sugimoto A, McGee J, Prefontaine M. High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for the treatment of high-volume locally recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Brachytherapy. 2016;15(5):543–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2016.06.010.
Murakami N, Kato T, Miyamoto Y, Nakamura S, Wakita A, Okamoto H, Tsuchida K, Kashihara T, Kobayashi K, Harada K, et al. Salvage high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for pelvic recurrent cervical Carcinoma after Hysterectomy. Anticancer Res. 2016;36(5):2413–21.
Kamran SC, Manuel MM, Catalano P, Cho L, Damato AL, Lee LJ, Schmidt EJ, Viswanathan AN. MR- versus CT-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. Brachytherapy. 2017;16(6):1159–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2017.07.007.
Alban G, Cheng T, Adleman J, Buzurovic I, Pretz J, Singer L, King M, Lee L. Definitive radiotherapy for vaginal recurrence of early-stage endometrial cancer: survival outcomes and effect of mismatch repair status. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(7):1007–13. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-002536.
Lee LJ, Alban GM, Cheng T, Buzurovic I, Pretz J, Singer L, King MT. Clinical outcomes and dosimetric predictors of toxicity for re-irradiation of vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. Brachytherapy. 2022;21(3):263–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2021.12.010.
Noh JM, Park W, Kim YS, Kim JY, Kim HJ, Kim J, Kim JH, Yoon MS, Choi JH, Yoon WS, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in uterine cervical cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13 – 10). Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(3):618–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.043.
Jung EJ, Byun JM, Kim YN, Lee KB, Sung MS, Kim KT, Jeong DH. Cervical adenocarcinoma has a poorer prognosis and a higher propensity for distant recurrence than squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27(6):1228–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001009.
Chino J, Annunziata CM, Beriwal S, Bradfield L, Erickson BA, Fields EC, Fitch K, Harkenrider MM, Holschneider CH, Kamrava M, et al. Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020;10(4):220–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2020.04.002.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank dedicated brachytherapy nurses Yanxia Yin and Jing Xu for their expertise and support; and Yanxiao Wang for her assistance with data collection.
Funding
The work was supported by grant from the Science and Technology Project of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (No.22Y31900500).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Hui Cong: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing-Original Draft. Xiaojing Yang: Writing-Review & Editing, Project administration. Zhaobin Li: Project administration. Zhen Li: Writing-Review & Editing. Shuchen Lin: Project administration. Wei Jiang: Resources, Supervision. Jie Fu: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, and the need to obtain informed consent was waived.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Cong, H., Yang, X., Li, Z. et al. Salvage radiotherapy for locally recurrent cervical and endometrial carcinoma: clinical outcomes and toxicities. BMC Cancer 24, 871 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12617-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12617-8