Skip to main content

A new approach to prevent radiation-induced xerostomia using intraglandular injection of mitochondria-boosting agents

Abstract

Radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer fairly leads to xerostomia, profoundly affecting their quality of life. With limited effective preventive and therapeutic methods, attention has turned to exploring alternatives. This article outlines how intraglandular injection of mitochondria-boosting agents can serve as a potential strategy to reduce salivary acinar damage. This method can contribute to the thoughtful development of study protocols or medications to reduce radiation-induced salivary glands damage.

Peer Review reports

Main text

Radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstay of treatment in patients with head and neck cancer [1]. Dry mouth (xerostomia) is one of the most common complaints observed in patients following head and neck RT [2]. Studies reveal that even with modern RT techniques, such as IMRT, a significant number of patients may be impacted by dry mouth [3]. Radiation-induced xerostomia (RiX) can occur early during the course of RT, with approximately a 50–60% decline in salivary flow within the first week of RT [4]. This adverse effect stems from direct acinar damage followed by collagen deposition in the salivary glands, transforming the glandular tissue into a fibrotic state and reducing the efficacy of therapeutic interventions [5]. Recovery from dry mouth typically requires at least six months [6], and it has been reported that over 64% of patients continue to complain of moderate to severe xerostomia even three years post-treatment [7]. A recent study demonstrated that only 18% of treated patients experienced complete recovery of xerostomia after a median follow-up of 37 months [8]. This condition significantly disrupts speech, swallowing, and oral hygiene, thus profoundly affecting the patient’s quality of life [9]. Therefore, efficient methods to prevent RiX are of crucial importance.

This issue has urged researchers worldwide to evaluate different strategies to reduce the incidence or severity of RiX [10]. There is still no confident method to prevent dry mouth. Surgical interventions have been applied to displace the submandibular glands to the submental space or forearm away from the radiation fields [11, 12]; however, this procedure might be associated with surgical complications and does not preserve the parotid glands from radiation. The sole FDA-approved xerostomia preventive method, amifostine, faces limited acceptance due to serious side effects [13]. In addition, some studies raised concern that amifostine may not be effective in the prevention of xerostomia in patients who receive concomitant chemotherapy [14]. Regarding the treatment of RiX, the available approaches use saliva substitutes and cholinergic agents (pilocarpine and cevimeline), which are limited in broad-spectrum clinical application due to short-term and severe side effects, respectively [15]. As such, the quest for effective preventive methods regarding RiX remains crucial.

RiX primarily arises from the generating free radicals and acinar cell damage [16]. Given this concept, several studies have tried to evaluate the efficacy of different sorts of antioxidants to prevent RiX. While antioxidants, such as α-lipoic acid (ALA), are highly reactive to free radicals and can prevent tissue damage and dysfunction [16], their effectiveness in preventing RiX may be limited. In addition, concerns about the tumor-protective effects of antioxidants would further restrict their clinical application during the RT course [17]. Due to these limitations, alternative agents are required to diminish the radiation effects on protecting salivary glands.

Emerging research has indicated that bolstering normal tissue mitochondria can mitigate RT side effects [18]. For example, Mohamed and Said demonstrated that coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) (a mitochondria-boosting agent) could prevent the radiation-induced bowel toxicity in a rat model [19]. In a separate animal study, low-dose CoQ10 could provide protection against radiation-induced ovarian damage [20]. These benefits might be due to the following mechanistic pathways: (1) As noted in our previous study, activated mitochondria can reduce the radiation effects by scavenging the released reactive oxygen species (ROSs) [21]; (2) Besides, the mitochondrial enhancement would restore the adenosine-triphosphate (ATP) content of salivary cells, supporting the function DNA-preserving proteins (e.g., PARP-1, XRCC1, ATM, and DNA ligases), which are reliant on ATP molecules [22]; (3) Cell proliferation is an energy-consuming process [23]. Hence, mitochondrial activation can improve the normal tissue capacity to divide and replace the damaged tissues. The first mechanism reflects the “radioprotective effect” of mitochondrial-boosting agents, while the second and third mechanisms reflect their “radiomitigating effect” [24].

Therefore, boosting the salivary glands’ acinar cells’ mitochondrial metabolism can potentially reduce the risk of acinar damage, thereby xerostomia, following radiation. In the following, two questions need to be answered: (Q1) Which agents can be applied to boost the mitochondrial function of salivary glands acinar cells? (Q2) What is the best method to deliver the selected mitochondria-activating agent to the salivary glands? Systemic or local?

R1) Mitochondrial metabolism relies on several cofactors; for example, CoQ10, α-lipoic acid, and L-carnitine. These cofactors have been applied in the supplements and medicines to improve the mitochondrial function [25]. Among these, CoQ10 is of special interest, and is more commonly applied in clinical settings. Idebenone is a synthetic, water-soluble form of CoQ10 applied to treat hereditary mitochondrial disorders [26]. In addition to the three mechanisms mentioned above, CoQ10 can further protect the acinar cells from radiation effects by its intrinsic antioxidant effects [27]. Other potential agents to improve mitochondrial biogenesis are resveratrol [28], mitochondria-targeted antioxidants (e.g., Mito-Tempo, mitoquinone [MitoQ], and 10-(6′-plastoquinonyl) decyltriphenylphosphonium [SKQ1]) [29], mitochondrial biogenesis modulators (e.g., PGC-1α activators). Selecting a single agent simplifies monitoring of its impact on mitochondrial biogenesis, ensuring focused and effective intervention. Among the available choices, idebenone is likely the optimal choice. FDA-approved for various human diseases, its superior tolerability, water solubility, and potent antioxidant properties make the idebenone a compelling option over CoQ10 [26]. In addition, the activation of idebenone in the mitochondrial membrane, cytosol, and mitochondrial matrix underscores its advantages over CoQ10 [30].

R2) Systemic administration of mitochondria activators might interfere with the radiation effects on the cancer cells by directly activating the cancer cells’ mitochondria [21]. In addition, cancer cells can improve their mitochondrial content by hijacking the functional mitochondria from the nearby normal cells through the intercellular nanoscale tubes [31]. With this background in mind, we propose a new technique to prevent the radiation damage to the salivary glands (Fig. 1):

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia using intraglandular injection of mitochondria-boosting agents

In this approach, the at-risk major salivary glands are identified based on RT dosimetric planning and salivary gland tolerance. The mitochondria-enhancing agent is injected into the at-risk salivary glands before primary RT and regularly during radiation. Intraglandular injections entail administering medication directly into the salivary glands. This approach offers the benefit of direct access, minimizing systemic side effects common with numerous therapies. Additionally, it is a time-efficient approach that necessitates lower dosages for injection. For patients undergoing RT, the intraglandular injection approach is preferred over the intraductal approach as it avoids the need to administer medication through the inflamed mucosa. This method bypasses potential disruptions to the procedure or challenges with tolerability. Applying a non-surgical transcutaneous approach can assist in reducing the morbidity of the procedures [32]. The benefit of an ultrasound guide can assist in better exploring the salivary glands [32]. Regular application of anti-inflammatory ointments or creams during radiation therapy can facilitate the use of transcutaneous injections throughout RT. Eventually, this method would enhance the acinar cells’ tolerability to the released ROS and improve their capability to repair the radiation-induced DNA damage (discussed above). This approach has the potential to inform the deliberate design of study protocols to mitigate radiation-induced salivary gland damage. To formulate comprehensive protocols for human studies, conducting animal-based studies is crucial to address key knowledge gaps, including determining the optimal agent, dosage, and administration sequence.

Conclusions

The impact of RiX on patients with head and neck cancer underscores the critical need for effective preventive and therapeutic approaches. Current preventive interventions, including surgical repositioning of glands and medicines, fall short due to associated complications and limited efficacy. Similarly, the use of antioxidants in preventing RiX presents challenges in balancing radioprotective effects and tumor protection concerns. As a promising alternative, enhancing salivary gland cells’ mitochondria offers multifaceted benefits. Activated mitochondria scavenge reactive oxygen species, restore ATP levels, and bolster cell proliferation, collectively mitigating radiation effects on salivary glands. Further exploration of mitochondrial-boosting agents is crucial in addressing the challenges posed by RiX and enhancing patients’ quality of life.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ALA:

α-lipoic acid

ATM:

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

CoQ10:

Coenzyme Q10

IMRT:

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy

MitoQ:

Mitoquinone

PAPR1:

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1

PGC-1α:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1 alpha

RiX:

Radiation-induced xerostomia

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

RT:

Radiotherapy

SKQ1:

10-(6′-plastoquinonyl) decyltriphenylphosphonium

XRCC1:

X-ray repair cross complementing 1

References

  1. Ameri A, Norouzi S, Sourati A, Azghandi S, Novin K, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. Randomized trial on acute toxicities of weekly vs three‐weekly cisplatin‐based chemoradiation in head and neck cancer. Cancer Rep. Jan. 2022;5(1):e1425. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1425.

  2. Berger T, Noble DJ, Shelley LEA, McMullan T, Bates A, Thomas S. Predicting radiotherapy-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients using day-to-day kinetics of radiomics features. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022;24:95–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Snider JW. Sticky stuff: xerostomia in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy-prevalence, prevention, and palliative care. Ann Palliat Med Vol. 2020;9(3):1340–50. 3rd.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinna R, Campus G, Cumbo E, Mura I, Milia E. Xerostomia induced by radiotherapy: an overview of the physiopathology, clinical evidence, and management of the oral damage. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:171–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nam K et al. Jan., Copper chelation reduces early collagen deposition and preserves saliva secretion in irradiated salivary glands, Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 2, p. e24368, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24368.

  6. Jaguar GC, Prado JD, Campanhã D, Alves FA. Clinical features and preventive therapies of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patient: a literature review. Appl Cancer Res, 37, 1, 2017.

  7. Wijers OB, Levendag PC, Braaksma MM, Boonzaaijer M, Visch LL, Schmitz PI. Patients with head and neck cancer cured by radiation therapy: a survey of the dry mouth syndrome in long-term survivors. Head Neck. 2002;24(8):737–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rades D, Warwas B, Gerull K, Pries R, Leichtle A, Bruchhage KL. Prognostic factors for complete recovery from Xerostomia after Radiotherapy of Head-and-Neck cancers. Vivo. 2022;36(4):1795–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nascimento ML, Farias AB, Carvalho AT, Albuquerque RF, Ribeiro LN, Leao JC. Impact of xerostomia on the quality of life of patients submitted to head and neck radiotherapy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 24, 6, 2019.

  10. Grundmann O, Fillinger JL, Victory KR, Burd R, Limesand KH. Restoration of radiation therapy-induced salivary gland dysfunction in mice by post therapy IGF-1 administration. BMC Cancer, 10, 1, 2010.

  11. Rieger J, Seikaly H, Jha N, Harris J, Williams D, Liu R. Submandibular Gland Transfer for Prevention of Xerostomia after Radiation Therapy: swallowing outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2005;131(2):140–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagen R, Scheich M, Kleinsasser N, Burghartz M. Two-stage autotransplantation of human submandibular gland: a novel approach to treat postradiogenic xerostomia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(8):2217–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rades D, Fehlauer F, Bajrovic A, Mahlmann B, Richter E, Alberti W. Serious adverse effects of amifostine during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2004;70(3):261–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gu J, Zhu S, Li X, Wu H, Li Y, Hua F. Effect of amifostine in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE, 9, 5, 2014.

  15. Li Y, Li X, Pang R, Yang G, Tian M, Zhao T. Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Radiotherapy-Induced Xerostomia, Rev. J Oncol, vol. 2022, no. 7802334, 2022.

  16. Liu Z, Dong L, Zheng Z, Liu S, Gong S, Meng L. Mechanism, Prevention, and treatment of Radiation-Induced Salivary Gland Injury related to oxidative stress. Antioxid Basel, 10, 11, 2021.

  17. D’Andrea GM. Use of antioxidants during chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be avoided. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(5):319–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Behnam B, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. Mitochondrial metabolism: a New Dimension of Personalized Oncology. Cancers, 15, 16, 2023.

  19. Mohamed HA, Said RS. Coenzyme Q10 attenuates inflammation and fibrosis implicated in radiation enteropathy through suppression of NF-kB/TGF-β/MMP-9 pathways. Int Immunopharmacol. Mar. 2021;92:107347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107347.

  20. Tekin YB et al. May., Evaluation of the protective effect of coenzyme Q10 against x-ray irradiation‐induced ovarian injury, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res, p. jog.15966, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15966.

  21. Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Houshyari M, Farhadi M. Mitochondrial metabolism: a predictive biomarker of radiotherapy efficacy and toxicity. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149(9):6719–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Taghizadeh-Hesary F. Reinforcement by Tumor Microenvironment: the seventh ‘R’ of Radiobiology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2023.

  23. VG AA, ME E, P. JJ, and, MC C. Mitochondrial regulation of cell cycle and proliferation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;16(10):1150–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Montoro A, Obrador E, Mistry D, Forte GI, Bravatà V, Minafra L. Radioprotectors, Radiomitigators, and Radiosensitizers. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Pagano G, Aiello Talamanca A, Castello G, Cordero MD, d’Ischia M, Gadaleta MN. Current experience in testing mitochondrial nutrients in disorders featuring oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction: rational design of chemoprevention trials. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(11):20169–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Suárez-Rivero JM, Pastor-Maldonado CJ, Povea-Cabello S, Álvarez-Córdoba M, Villalón-García I, Munuera-Cabeza M. Coenzyme Q10 analogues: benefits and challenges for therapeutics. Antioxidants, 10, 2, 2021.

  27. Silva SVE, Gallia MC, Luz J, Rezende AA, Bongiovanni GA, Araujo-Silva G. Antioxidant effect of Coenzyme Q10 in the Prevention of oxidative stress in Arsenic-treated CHO-K1 cells and possible participation of Zinc as a Pro-oxidant Agent. Nutrients, 14, 16, 2022.

  28. Jardim FR, Rossi FT, Nascimento MX, Silva Barros RG, Borges PA, Prescilio IC. Resveratrol and Brain Mitochondria: a review. Resveratrol Brain Mitochondria Rev Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(3):2085–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sacks B, Onal H, Martorana R, Sehgal A, Harvey A, Wastella C. Mitochondrial targeted antioxidants, mitoquinone and SKQ1, not vitamin C, mitigate doxorubicin-induced damage in H9c2 myoblast: pretreatment vs. co-treatment. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol, 22, 1, 2021.

  30. Gueven N, Woolley K, Smith J. Border between natural product and drug: comparison of the related benzoquinones idebenone and coenzyme Q10. Redox Biol. Apr. 2015;4:289–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.009.

  31. Saha T, et al. Intercellular nanotubes mediate mitochondrial trafficking between cancer and immune cells. Nat Nanotechnol. Jan. 2022;17(1):98–106. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-01000-4.

  32. Almansoori AA, Hariharan A, Cao UMN, Upadhyay A, Tran SD. Drug Therapeutics Delivery to the Salivary Glands: Intraglandular and Intraductal Injections, in Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 20, vol. 1436, K. Turksen, Ed., in Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1436., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2023_765.

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Supervision MF; Conceptualization FTH; Writing original draft FTH, SM, PF; Final editing and validation MF, SM, PF, and FTH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to Participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farhadi, M., Fadavi, P., Mohebbi, S. et al. A new approach to prevent radiation-induced xerostomia using intraglandular injection of mitochondria-boosting agents. BMC Cancer 24, 832 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12582-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12582-2

Keywords