Skip to main content

Recurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma in surgically treated patients at Khartoum Teaching Dental Hospital retrospective cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background

In terms of survival rate, recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) after primary surgery is considered as a poor prognostic indicator.

Objective

This study aims to determine the incidence of OSCC recurrence among patients treated at Khartoum Teaching Dental Hospital (KTDH) and possible risk factors associated with it.

Methods

Records of 303 patients with a history of radical surgery were retrieved from the hospital’s archives, and the histopathological records were retrieved from the archival specimens of Professor Ahmed Suleiman Oral Pathology Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, and University of Khartoum.

Results

Advanced stages of OSCC (III, IV) were associated with higher recurrence rates, and the poorly differentiated OSCC was the commonest recurrent type.

Conclusion

The condition of the surgical margin is a significant predictor of OSCC recurrence and tumor stage. The tumor site, the type of surgical resection, and the tumor differentiation were also identified as significant factors influencing the recurrence of OSCC.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Oral cancer is common in males [1]. Physical examination, laboratory testing, and imaging diagnose oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Over the past years, chemo, radiation, and targeted therapy have improved, but surgery is still the best treatment. Due to local invasion and metastasis, OSCC recurs. OSCC recurrence is a significant prognostic indicator [2]. Recurrence occurs six months after radical tumour resection with safe margins and complete regression [3]. Recurrent rate in OSCC patients is 26% with 40.2%. Mean 5-year overall survival rate [1]. This study examines OSCC recurrence, risk factors, and post-surgical survival rate in OSCC patients.

Literature review

There are several clinical and demographical variables that influence recurrence of tumor. For instance, age and gender, use of tobacco and alcohol, site of the tumor, stage and grade of the tumor. Age and prognosis are debateable. OSCC in children may reduce aggressiveness and improve prognosis [2]. A study showed no link between age and OSCC recurrence [2], while recurrence mostly observed in males (mean age = 59) [4]. Tobacco-use strongly predicts head and neck squamous cell carcinoma recurrence (HNSCC) [5]. Smokers and drinkers are four times more prone to secondary tumor [2]. In India, buccal mucosa cancer is more common than tongue cancer in the west [5]. Studies reported that tongue cancer contributed to OSCC recurrence after surgery, followed by the floor of the mouth [4, 6, 7]. Numerous studies link OSCC recurrence to tumor (T) stage. OSCC regional recurrence was highly influenced by T and Nodal (N) stages, especially stage III and IV. OSCC recurrence in surgery-only patients is strongly correlated with lymph node metastases [8]. Local, nodal, and distant recurrence patients were mostly in stages III and IV [5]. Stage I-II recurrence individuals have a better prognosis [1].

Treatment variables that influence recurrence include type of surgery, chemo or radiotherapeutic approach, and neck dissection. Marginal mandibulectomy reduces morbidity and treats early-stage cancer [9]. Segmental and marginal resections may avoid postoperative recurrences, SPTs, metastases, and comorbidities [10]. Studies have examined whether OSCC skin flap surgery reduces recurrence and improves survival and suggest that flap repair reduces local tumor recurrence [2]. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC and AC) may reduce cancer recurrence and improve survival [2, 11,12,13,14]. NAC has not improved survival in a study [15,16,17], whereas NAC found to increase the regional failure in N0 OSCC patients [18]. Stage III and IV radiation treatment failure rates were highest locally and regionally. Unfortunately, local and loco-regional failures are increasing in clinical stages III and IV radiation patients [19]. Moreover, neck dissection is a major predictor of OSCC recurrence in individuals treated with surgery alone. The un-dissected neck has a much higher OSCC recurrence risk [19, 20].

Histopathological variables include, histological grading, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and involvement of surgical margins.

Histopathological tumor grading predicts the disease-free and overall survival [6, 21,22,23,24,25]. Poor differentiation predicts OSCC recurrence in surgery-only patients [6, 26], while recurrence rate was shown to be higher in moderately differentiated OSCC [4]. Pathologists call it a perineural invasion when a tumor invades a nerve’s sheath and covering (PNI). Studies have connected PNI to a worse 5-year survival rate, an increased risk of disease recurrence, and regional and distant metastasis [23, 27,28,29,30]. A study found that PNI is unrelated to recurrence [2]. While another study reported that OSCC demonstrates that PNI histologically impacts adjuvant treatment decisions and the surgical management of the disease [31].

LVI in cancer cells in an endothelial-lined space (either lymphatic vessels or blood vessels). It is associated with the risk of local recurrences and lymph node metastasis [32]. However, Adel et et al. (2015) reported that LVI does not affect the loco-regional recurrence nor the distant metastasis in patients with OSCC after surgery [33]. Resection of clear surgical margins of a minimum of 5 mm healthy tissues is crucial to prevent local recurrence [34]. It is reported that negative tumor margins are related to a low recurrence rate [2], as 60% recurrence is reported in patients with close resection margins [5].

OSCC recurrence is a major prognostic factor. After surgery, tumor recurrence is associated with a poor prognosis, a decline in quality of life, and an increase in mortality. In spite of excellent surgical resection with negative free margins, neck dissection, and NA therapy, the disease returns in some patients. Literature suggests that the total recurrence rate is 26%, with local, regional, and loco-regional recurrences with 47.3, 35.1, and 10.9%, respectively [1]. Recurrence rates of OSCC is generally high, ranging from 21 to 47.1% [2, 6, 8, 19, 26, 34,35,36,37]. Eltohami et al. reported (30%) of patients developed recurrences, and (15%) developed second primary tumours [38]. And 34.9% of oral tongue initial cancers recurred. Recurrence impacts OSCC patients’ 5-year and disease-free survival. 29.1% mean 5-year overall survival percentage following recurrence for advanced stages [1]. It has reported that 30% patients with recurrence survived [6], while local recurrence survival rate is 66.7%.

Local recurrences are caused by leftover cancer cells left after surgery, while SPTs originate from oral mucosal epithelial precursor lesions. The regional recurrence in patients who underwent surgical removal of OSCC alone is the most common recurrence pattern (50%), followed by local (38.9%) and loco-regional (13%) [8, 37]. Kernohan et al. (2010) found that early local recurrence (less than six months after surgery) and late nodal recurrence are worse (6 months or more after the initial surgery). The median recurrence time after surgery is 7.5 months. However, various studies reported 8.5 [7, 37], 14, and 26 months [2, 6] median time for recurrence.

Methodology

Study participants

Inclusion criteria

The patients meeting the following criteria were selected for the study: (i) preoperative and postoperative pathology confirmed primary OSCC, (ii) OSCC surgery patients at Khartoum Teaching Dental Hospital (KTDH) from 2013 to 2016, (iii) complete clinic-pathologic and follow-up data.

Exclusion criteria

Excluded patients were: (i) non-OSCC cancers, (ii) secondary OSCC, (iii) carcinoma with the unknown primary tumor, (iv) incomplete medical records.

Methods

The Ethics Committee Ministry of Health, Sudan, and the University of Khartoum Research Ethics Board approved this study. Name of the patients were kept confidential and replaced with serial number. Patients were called or questioned during follow-up consultations. A retrospective chart review utilizing a custom-designed data entry sheet recorded demographic and tumor treatment information for the trial. Clinical variables came from KTDH archives, and histopathological variables obtained from Professor Ahmed Suleiman Oral Pathology Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, and University of Khartoum archives.

Sample size and sampling technique

This study did not calculate sample size. Instead, the sample size was determined by the number of patients who fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria during recruitment (Convenience sample).

Data management and statistical analysis

Data was double-checked and transferred to IBMSPSS Inc., Chicago, and version 22 for analysis. Age, gender, cigarette, alcohol, T stage, tumor original location, type of surgery, skin flap, neck dissection, chemo/radiotherapy, histological grading, PNI, surgical margins, and LVI were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Numerical parameters were categorized. The chi-square test compared categorical data. Bivariate Analysis was done. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant and survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases) codes determined tumor site.

Study variables

Demographics

  1. 1.

    Patient-related variables.

  2. 2.

    Age.

  3. 3.

    Gender.

  4. 4.

    Habits (snuff dipping, smoking, alcohol).

Recurrence variables

  1. 1.

    Date of first diagnosis.

  2. 2.

    Date of surgery.

  3. 3.

    Date of recurrence.

  4. 4.

    Survival after recurrence variables:

  5. 5.

    Last, follow-up date.

  6. 6.

    Date of death.

Results

Analysis of demographic variables

The research duration was considered from 2013 to 2016. N = 200 males and 103 females. The average age of participants at first diagnosis was 58.9 years (men = 59.2 years, and women 58.2). We observed 130 (42.9%) cases for free safety margins, 118 (38.9%) with involved margins, 46 (15.2%) with close margins, and 9 (3.0%) cases with dysplastic margins. The recurrence rate in patients with free (24.6%), involved (58.5%), close (47.8%), and dysplastic (22.2%) surgical margins was found. Similarly, high recurrence rate (46.2%) was observed with marginal mandibulectomy. The combination of surgery and radiotherapy showed the least recurrence rate (11.8%). Survival rate in patients with recurrence was 4% (2 years), significantly lower than the patients without recurrence (68%). Males were found with more recurrence rates than females.

Among the patient samples, 53.5% were Toombak dippers, while 27.1% were cigarette smokers. Male alcohol usage was modest at 11.6%., and they use Toombak 72.2% more than females (21.4%), (Table 1). Most patients complained of ulceration, edema, and loose teeth. The most common symptoms were a lump (82%), ulcers (73.3%), pain (71.6%), a neck node (48.5%), and teeth mobility (24.8%), (Table 2).

Table 1 Frequency of patients’ habits
Table 2 Frequency of patients’ complaints

Recurrence variables analysis

The study analysed the recurrence rate with respect to surgical margins. In patients with free surgical margin 24.6% (n = 32) recurrence was found. The tumor recurred in 58.5% of patients with involved margins, 47.8% with narrow margins, and 22.2% with dysplastic surgical margins (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation between recurrence and the surgical margin status

Histopathological assessment showed recurrence in 23.8% and 29.2% patients with positive and negative LVI, respectively. Whereas, recurrence in positive and negative PNI was found to be 28.1% and 26.8%, respectively. Furthermore, 55.6%, 23.1%, and 20.7% recurrence was observed in poorly, moderately and well-differentiated tumors, respectively (Table 4).

Table 4 Recurrence in relation to PNI and LVI and tumour differentiation

The site of the primary OSCC significantly affects the recurrence rate of the tumor; the most sites that suffered recurrence were the gum and gingivolabial vestibule (44.1%). The location was identified using codes from ICD-10, (Table 5).

Table 5 Tumor site in relation to recurrence

The most predominant histological tumor differentiation in the present study is well-differentiated SCC (60.1%), followed by moderately differentiated SCC (27.1%) and poorly differentiated SCC (6.9%). PNI was identified in 76 patients (25.1%), while only 49 patients (16.2%) showed LVI (Table 6). The median time between surgery and recurrence was eight months. Regarding gender preference in relation to recurrence, males (28.7%) tend to have more recurrence than females (16.3%), (Table 7).

Table 6 Histological grades of differentiation, PNI, and LVI
Table 7 Distribution of gender among recurrence and non-recurrence groups

In this study, T3 and T4 tumors had 22.9 and 27.1% recurrence rates, whereas T1 and T2 had 12.5 and 25.6%. Negative lymph nodes had a 29.2% greater recurrence rate than positive ones (23.8%). Recurrence rises with T stage, but not much (Table 8).

Table 8 Recurrence in relation to tumor size, lymph nodes involvement, and TNM stage

The treatment modalities also affected the recurrence; hence the marginal mandibulectomy had a higher recurrence rate (46.2%) than maxillectomy (33.3%). But the types of neck dissection affect the recurrence significantly, as the modified radical neck dissection (16.4%), and supraomohyoid neck dissection (32.3%) had the least recurrence rate. Level I had the highest rate (40.0%), while those who didn’t have neck dissection have recurrence rate of 33.3% (Table 9).

Table 9 Recurrence in relation to the type of resection and type of neck dissection

In this study, 29.8% patients received the triple treatment developed recurrence, while patients who had surgery + radiotherapy observed with least recurrence rate that is 11.8% (Table 10).

Table 10 Recurrence in relation to treatment modalities

The mortality rate in all the patients with free surgical margins who developed recurrence was 78.1%, while only 15.6% were alive after recurrence (Table 11). The overall 4 and 2-years survival was 21.1% and 40.0%, respectively, for all OSCC patients who underwent treatment, with its highest records in the first month postoperatively 95% followed by 86.2% in the third month and 71.6% in the sixth month (Fig. 1). In this study, one-year survival was 20% and two-year survival was 4%. All patients died 32 months’ post-recurrence. While in the non-recurrence group, the 2-year survival rate was 68%, and the 4-years survival rate was 45% (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Survival rate of the recurrence group

Fig. 2
figure 2

Survival rate of the recurrence group

Fig. 3
figure 3

Survival rate of the recurrence group

Table 11 Recurrence in relation to the mortality rate

Discussion

Complete resection of tumors and free margins is the key to good loco-regional control in OSCC. This study examines the recurrence rate of OSCC patients for surgical, clinical and histopathologic parameters, as well as survival after recurrence.

Studies show that older people are more likely to develop OSCC. Llewellyn et al. (2001) found most cases between 50 and 80 years old [39, 40]. Smoking, drinking, and sun exposure make males more likely to get OSCC than women. Males have a 2:1 to 4:1 prevalence rate over women [41,42,43]. Our Sudanese OSCC patients were usually elderly. Patients with average age of 58.9 years were more likely to be men than women (66%).

Tobacco, alcohol, and betel quid are known OSCC risk factors [44]. In the present study, 53.5% of patients had a history of Toombak dipping, and 27.1% smoked. These numbers are similar to Fang et al. (2013), 61.3% smokers. In this study, 11.6% of patients had a history of alcohol drinking [43].

Many OSCC suffer differently. OSCC lead to ulceration, edema, and tooth loss in patients. The common symptoms found were lump (82.5%), ulcer (73.3%), and mostly pain. In Sudanese investigations, maximum patients had exophytic ulcerated masses on the inner side of the lower lip (gingivolabial) where snuff is dipped [45,46,47].

The UK Royal College of Pathologists guidelines consider margins of 5 mm or more from the invasive tumor cells as clear margins, 1–5 mm as close margins, and less than 1 mm as involved margins [23]. In the present study, the difference in the recurrence rates between clear, close, and involved excision margins was significant. Clear surgical margins had a 24.6% recurrence rate, similar to Guerra et al. (2003), who reported 21% [48]. The recurrence rate was 47.8% for individuals with close margins and 58.5% for involved margins. Priya et al. (2012) found 30.4% recurrence in close margin, while 41.5% of patients with involved margins did not recur, possibly because most were referred for chemotherapy and radiation or because the postoperative surgical margins evaluation histological diagnosis was incorrect [49]. Struckmeier et al. in Germany reported that Recurrence manifested in 16.63% of the patients, encompassing local recurrence in (77.14% of the patients and distant metastasis in (34.28%). Neck recurrence occurred in only (0.24%) on the contralateral side [50]. Dysplastic cells need time to become malignant, hence close margins (47.8%) had greater recurrence than dysplastic margins (22.2%). Most study shows that diagnosing symptoms are important.

TNM staging and histopathological grading determine outcome. Histological grade predicts recurrence. Poor differentiation had the poorest prognosis and greatest recurrence (55.6%), whereas moderate and well-differentiated had 23.1% and 20.7%, respectively. Eldeeb et al. (2012) found that poorly differentiated tumors had 83.0% greater recurrence rates than moderate and well-differentiated tumors [46]. Priya et al. (2012) observed that histological differentiation did not affect recurrence [49].

Since various cancers affect different bodily parts, the anatomic location of a lesion can predict prognosis [2]. Tongue and floor of mouth SCC has a poor prognosis because to cervical metastases, inaccessibility, and late reporting [7]. In this research, recurrence occurred more often in the gum and gingivo-labial regions (44.1%) following the palate (42.9%). Early observations suggested that mouth floor tumors are harder to cure locally than other oral malignancies. This study found no significant changes because there were few patients with such sub-sites cancers.

PNI in the primary tumor predicts cervical metastasis and loco-regional recurrence, according to Jadhav et al. (2013) [2]. In this study, PNI, LVI, and recurrence were unrelated. In agreement with our findings, Liao et al. (2008) discovered no statistically significant difference between 5-year local control, and overall survival rates of OSCC patients with PNI [34]. In contrast, Brandwein-Gensler et al. (2005) discovered that PNI was a strong independent predictor of local recurrence and overall survival, regardless of tumor margin quality [51].

Gender also affects OSCC recurrence. Wang et al. (2013) found that female patients had fewer recurrence (31.9%) than men (33.7%) [2]. In this study, ladies experienced less recurrence than males (16.3% vs. 28.7%). This may be attributed to the fact that women seek medical treatment earlier and more often than men.

Related to the impact of tumor size on the outcome, it is proven that smaller the tumor size, the better the prognosis. Our study found 38.1% recurrence rate of T1 and T2, while T3 and T4 had a 50% recurrence rate. Similar results were reported by Wang et al. (2013), who found T1 and T2 with 20.3% recurrence rate, while T3 and T4 with 57% [2, 46]. It is also found that negative lymph nodes had a lower recurrence rate (23.3%) than positive ones (48.5%). These findings contradict with present study’s which found that negative lymph nodes had a greater recurrence rate (29.2%) than positive lymph nodes (23.8%). Surgical excision without neck dissection may explain this variation in patients with negative lymph nodes. Clinically negative lymph nodes require prophylactic neck dissection.

TNM staging predicts OSCC recurrence. Stages III and IV had a 49.6% recurrence rate, compared to 37.5% for stages I and II. Sharma et al. (2016) found that most local, nodal, and distant recurrences occurred in stages III and IV [5]. Recurrence with stage I and II primary tumors have a better prognosis [1].

Literature showed that marginal resection technique is not associated with a worse prognosis [48]. This varies from the present study, where marginal mandibulectomy had a greater recurrence rate (46.2%) than segmental (22.2%). The difference may be due to inadequate bone resection in the marginal technique to preserve the mandible’s lower border.

In OSCC patients who have surgery alone, neck dissection type predicts recurrence. Un-dissected necks showed higher OSCC recurrence [19, 20]. In this study, the un-dissected neck had the highest recurrence rate (33.3%), while the modified neck dissection had the lowest (16.4%). Even N0 lymph nodes may contain micro-invasive cancer cells that cause recurrence, requiring neck dissection.

AC improves prognosis and recurrence [2, 11,12,13,14]. Compared to surgery + chemotherapy (28.6%) and surgery + radiation (11.8%), the triple therapy combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy had a 29.8% recurrence rate. However, triple-modality patients were sicker.

Several studies indicate cancer survival even after recurrence, such as 5-year survival in 30% cases [6], 2-year survival in 67.6%, and 5-year survival rate in 31.8% [2]. Kernohan et al. (2010) identified an 18% 2-year survival rate for patients who recurred within 3 months postoperatively [7]. Struckmeier et al. reported that the 5-year Overall Survival stood at 58.29%, Patients with early recurrence within ≤ 12 months showed the least favorable prognosis [50]. This study found a 4% (2-years) survival rate and 32-month post-recurrence mortality. In this study, over 80% recurrences occurred within 2 years, validating the current approach of intense and frequent surveillance in the first few years after therapy. Cancer may return despite cancer-free tumor margins. Peripheral cancer cells may not indicate recurrence. Histological type, tumor site, stage, PNI, and depth of invasion increase local recurrence [51].

Conclusion

Overall, advanced tumor stages III and IV enhance OSCC recurrence. Surgical margin status predicts OSCC recurrence. Modified neck dissection reduced OSCC recurrences in surgically treated individuals. This research may improve treatment strategies for OSCC in Sudan.

Recommendation

  1. 1.

    OSCC prevention needs improvement.

  2. 2.

    patients should employ intraoperative frozen sections analysis (IFSA) and genetic markers to monitor tumor margin status.

  3. 3.

    Raising OSCC knowledge improves early detection.

  4. 4.

    Patient follow-up must be planned.

Limitations

While the study adds to previous literature, some limitations must be acknowledged. Participation in this study was limited to a convenient sample of patients, while the sample size was adequate, further research with a larger sample size, including more histopathologic variables and a longer follow up time is recommended.

Table show the histopathological factors used in the study

Site

Total

percent

Lip

24

7.9%

Tongue

44

14.5%

Gum and gingivolabial

70

23.1%

Floor of the mouth

6

2.0%

Palate

36

11.9%

Unspecified

46

15.2%

Ill-defined sites

63

20.8%

Maxillary sinus

14

4.6%

Total

303

100.0%

 

Frequency

Percent

T1

11

3.6

T2

72

23.8

T3

80

26.4

T4

140

46.2

Total

303

100

 

Frequency

Percent

N0

106

35

N1

122

40.3

N2

69

22.8

N3

6

2

Total

303

100

 

Frequency

Percent

Stage I

11

3.6

Stage II

47

15.5

Stage III

90

29.7

Stage IV

155

51.2

Total

303

100

 

Frequency

Percent

free

130

42.9

Involved

118

38.9

dysplasia

9

3

Close

46

15.2

Total

303

100

Perineural invasion

Frequency

Percent

Positive

76

25.1

Negative

140

46.2

Unknown

87

28.7

Total

303

100

Lymphovascular invasion

Frequency

Percent

Positive

49

16.2

Negative

165

54.5

Unknown

89

29.4

Total

303

100

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. González-García R. The role of salvage surgery in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Plast Aesthetic Res. 2016;3:189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jadhav KB, Gupta N. Clinicopathological prognostic implicators of oral squamous cell carcinoma: need to understand and revise. North Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(12):671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang B, et al. The recurrence and survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a report of 275 cases. Chin J cancer. 2013;32(11):614.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jerjes W, et al. Clinicopathological parameters, recurrence, locoregional and distant metastasis in 115 T1-T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Head Neck Oncol. 2010;2(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma M, et al. Retrospective analysis of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery and adjuvent radiotherapy. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4:1000–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindenblatt RdCR, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma grading systems–analysis of the best survival predictor. J oral Pathol Med. 2012;41(1):34–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kernohan MD, et al. Predicting the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma after first recurrence. Archives Otolaryngology–Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(12):1235–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim YC, Choi EC. Surgery alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: survival rates, recurrence patterns, and salvage treatment. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008;128(10):1132–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Politi M, et al. Review of segmental and marginal resection of the mandible in patients with oral cancer. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120(5):569–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolff D, Hassfeld S, Hofele C. Influence of marginal and segmental mandibular resection on the survival rate in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior parts of the oral cavity. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2004;32(5):318–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper JS, et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(19):1937–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trufelli DC, et al. Complete pathologic response as a prognostic factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx post-chemoradiotherapy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;81:498–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirita T, et al. Primary tumour resection of tongue carcinoma based on response to preoperative therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31(3):267–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Loré Jr JM, et al. Improved survival with preoperative chemotherapy followed by resection uncompromised by tumor response for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1995;170(5):506–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Licitra L, et al. Primary chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity squamous cell cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(2):327–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yanamoto S, et al. Predictors of locoregional recurrence in T1-2N0 tongue cancer patients. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013;19(4):795–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pignon J-P, et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92(1):4–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okura M, et al. Decision analysis and treatment threshold in a management for the N0 neck of the oral cavity carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(10):908–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carvalho A, Magrin J, Kowalski LP. Sites of recurrence in oral and oropharyngeal cancers according to the treatment approach. Oral Dis. 2003;9(3):112–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolfensberger M, et al. Surgical treatment of early oral carcinoma—results of a prospective controlled multicenter study. Head Neck: J Sci Specialties Head Neck. 2001;23(7):525–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kreppel M, et al. The role of clinical versus histopathological staging in patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by radical surgery. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2013;41(1):22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Larsen SR, et al. The prognostic significance of histological features in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J oral Pathol Med. 2009;38(8):657–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Woolgar JA. Histopathological prognosticators in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2006;42(3):229–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Koo BS, et al. Recurrence and salvage treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Oncol. 2006;42(8):789–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fortin A, et al. Does histologic grade have a role in the management of head and neck cancers? J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(21):4107–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ganpathi Iyer S, et al. Surgical treatment outcomes of localized squamous carcinoma of buccal mucosa. Head Neck: J Sci Specialties Head Neck. 2004;26(10):897–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tadbir AA, Ashraf MJ, Sardari Y. Prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilic infiltration in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(2):287–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. de Matos FR, et al. Analysis of inflammatory infiltrate, perineural invasion, and risk score can indicate concurrent metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(7):1703–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller ME, et al. A novel classification system for perineural invasion in noncutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: histologic subcategories and patient outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33(2):212–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rahima B, et al. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2004;97(4):423–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Binmadi NO, Basile JR. Perineural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a discussion of significance and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(11):1005–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jardim J, et al. Prognostic impact of perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion in advanced stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(1):23–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Adel M et al. Evaluation of lymphatic and vascular invasion in relation to clinicopathological factors and treatment outcome in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Medicine, 2015. 94(43).

  34. Liao C-T, et al. Analysis of risk factors of predictive local tumor control in oral cavity cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):915–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Scully C, Bagan J. Oral squamous cell carcinoma overview. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(4/5):301–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brown J, et al. A comparison of outcomes for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma at intermediate risk of recurrence treated by surgery alone or with post-operative radiotherapy. Oral Oncol. 2007;43(8):764–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu C-H, et al. Patterns of recurrence and second primary tumors in oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery alone. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013;29(10):554–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Eltohami Y, Suleiman A. Survival analysis of Sudanese oral squamous cell carcinoma patients with field of cancerization. BMC Cancer. 2024;24(1):473. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12197-7. PMID: 38622532; PMCID: PMC11017610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Llewellyn C, Johnson N, Warnakulasuriya K. Risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in young people—a comprehensive literature review. Oral Oncol. 2001;37(5):401–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jaber M, Fanas SA. The pattern of occurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Libya. Ibnosina J Med Biomedical Sci. 2010;2(03):105–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ol G, Dutra rA, Tartaglia S, Vasconcellos WA, Barbosa AA, Aguiar mC. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study of 740 cases in a Brazilian population. Braz Dent J. 2001;12(1):57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kim B-G, et al. Retrospective study on factors affecting the prognosis in oral cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment only. Maxillofacial Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;38(1):1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fang QG, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: analysis of clinical presentation, outcome and prognostic factors. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1(3):531–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Eltayeb AS, Satti A, Sulieman AM. Oral cancer awareness in Sudan: Assessment of knowledge, attitude and treatment seeking behavior. Asian Pac J Cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2017;18(6):1645.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bagan J, Sarrion G, Jimenez Y. Oral cancer: clinical features. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(6):414–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Eldeeb H, et al. The effect of the surgical margins on the outcome of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: single institution experience. Cancer Biology Med. 2012;9(1):29.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Irawati N, Hao S-p. Clinicopathological parameters and Locoregional recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Int J Head Neck Surg. 2017;6(4):161–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Guerra MFM, et al. Marginal and segmental mandibulectomy in patients with oral cancer: a statistical analysis of 106 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(11):1289–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Priya S, Pai P. Cut margins and disease control in oral cancers. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;8(1):74–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Struckmeier AK, Buchbender M, Lutz R, Kesting M. Improved recurrence rates and progression-free survival in primarily surgically treated oral squamous cell carcinoma - results from a German tertiary medical center. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(5):262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05644-z. PMID: 38642146; PMCID: PMC11032275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Brandwein-Gensler M, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(2):167–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sharma M et al. Retrospective Anal oral Cavity Squamous cell Carcinoma Treat Surg Adjuvent Radiotherapy 2016.

  53. Cooper JS et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med, 2004. 350(19).

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.A., A.M.S., M.E., A.A.S. and N.T. contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by N.A. The first draft of the manuscript was written by N.A, M.E, A.M.S, Statistical expertise provided by AS and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nourelhoda Alim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Informed consent

Obtained from all individual participants included in the study, including consent to publish.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alim, N., Elsheikh, M., Satti, A.A. et al. Recurrence of oral squamous cell carcinoma in surgically treated patients at Khartoum Teaching Dental Hospital retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 24, 781 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12562-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12562-6

Keywords