Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant duration with post-treatment fall-related injury and fracture in patients with stage III colon cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer volume 24, Article number: 878 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy yields a significant survival benefit in stage III colon cancer and is the standard of care. Simultaneously, it causes dose-dependent peripheral neuropathy that may increase the risk of fall-related injury (FRI) such as fracture and laceration. Because these events carry significant morbidity and the global burden of colon cancer is on the rise, we examined the association between treatment with a full versus shortened course of adjuvant chemotherapy and post-treatment FRI and fracture.

Methods

In this overlap propensity score weighted, retrospective cohort study, we included patients aged ≥ 18 years with resected stage III colon cancer diagnosed 2007–2019 and treated with oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (oxaliplatin plus a fluoropyrimidine; capecitabine [CAPOX] or 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin [FOLFOX]). Propensity score methods facilitate the separation of design from analysis and comparison of baseline characteristics across the weighted groups. Treatment groups were defined as 50% (4 cycles CAPOX/6 cycles FOLFOX) and > 85% (7–8 cycles CAPOX/11–12 cycles FOLFOX) of a maximal course of adjuvant chemotherapy to approximate the treatment durations received in the IDEA collaboration. The main outcomes were time to any FRI and time to fracture. We determined the subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) estimating the association between FRI/fracture and treatment group, accounting for the competing risk of death.

Results

We included 3,461 patients; 473 (13.7%) received 50% and 2,988 (86.3%) received > 85% of a maximal course of adjuvant therapy. For post-treatment FRI, median follow-up was 4.6 years and total follow-up was 17,968 person-years. There were 508 FRI, 301 fractures, and 692 deaths. Treatment with > 85% of a maximal course of therapy conferred a sHR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.62–1.13) for post-treatment FRI and a sHR of 0.72 (95% CI 0.49–1.06) for post-treatment fracture.

Conclusion

For patients with stage III colon cancer undergoing treatment with oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, any potential neuropathy associated with longer durations of treatment was not found to result in greater rates of FRI and fracture. Within the limits of this retrospective study, our findings suggest concern about FRI, while mechanistically plausible, ought not to determine treatment duration.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

While oxaliplatin chemotherapy is recommended by guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer, it causes serious, dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy (PN) [1, 2]. The severity of oxaliplatin-associated PN varies from mild numbness or tingling experienced by up to 99% of patients treated with the drug to disabling symptoms that can preclude further treatment and persist for years after treatment [3,4,5,6]. Despite the known relationship between PN and gait and balance, few studies have examined the potential relationship between differing durations of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy and fall-related injury (FRI) – a substantial and potentially avoidable source of morbidity and mortality [7,8,9,10,11].

The potential association between extent of oxaliplatin treatment and risk of post-treatment FRI is relevant for patients and clinicians deciding between 3 versus 6 months of adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer after the publication of the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Collaboration (IDEA) results [12]. An international survey of oncologists found that half reported no greater confidence in decision-making around adjuvant therapy after the publication of IDEA, indicating that in practice this treatment decision remains difficult and may be sensitive to knowledge of additional harms and benefits of differing treatment durations [13]. Moreover, this decision is of lasting importance given that a subset of patients will develop chronic PN, potentially putting them at increased risk for falls into their older years when they are most vulnerable to FRI [5].

The existing literature describing the relationship between neurotoxic chemotherapy and FRI has found an association between FRI and treatment with neurotoxic agents as compared with treatment without any neurotoxic agents [14,15,16,17,18]. However, it is unknown if a relationship exists when comparing durations of chemotherapy in a cohort of patients who all receive neurotoxic chemotherapy. Thus, we have designed a population-based, retrospective cohort study using linked health administrative databases to investigate the association between receipt of 50% versus > 85% of a maximal course of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy and long-term, post-treatment FRI and fracture in routine practice. These treatment groups were chosen to approximate the treatment durations in the IDEA collaboration.

Methods

Study design and population

This retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data is reported in accordance with the RECORD statement and checklist (Online-only Table 1) [19].

Health services and population databases held at ICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) were used to ascertain covariates, exposures, and outcomes. These datasets were linked using unique encoded identifiers and analyzed at ICES. ICES is an independent non-profit institution with protected legal status allowing it to analyze routinely collected health service and population data.

We included Ontario residents aged ≥ 18 at the time of incident stage III colon adenocarcinoma diagnosis in the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR) between January 1 2007 and December 31 2019 (Online-only Table 2). The OCR registers incident cancers in Ontario from 1964 onwards and is over 95% complete [20]. The year 2007 was chosen as a cutoff because prior to this date, Ontario staging data are limited and oxaliplatin for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer was not funded by the Ontario Health Insurance Program (OHIP).

Vital status was obtained from the Registered Persons’ Database (RPDB). Individuals were excluded if they had a diagnosis date after their death date, previous cancer diagnosis within 5 years of colon cancer diagnosis, a previous colon cancer diagnosis at any time, multiple simultaneous primary colon cancer diagnoses, non-adenocarcinoma histology, stage IV disease, no curative colon cancer resection within 6 months of diagnosis, previous chemotherapy within 5 years of colon cancer diagnosis, previous oxaliplatin treatment at any time, less than 2 years OHIP coverage prior to the date of first oxaliplatin treatment, or treatment with 0 or > 12 cycles of oxaliplatin. All codes used to define the cohort are listed in Online-only Table 2.

Exposure

Treatment groups were defined as 50% (4 cycles of CAPOX or 6 cycles of FOLFOX) and > 85% (7–8 cycles of CAPOX or 11–12 cycles of FOLFOX) of a maximal course of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy to approximate the treatment durations actually received by patients in the IDEA collaboration [21]. Oxaliplatin cycles were ascertained from the Drug Funding Program (NDFP) database, which records all oxaliplatin administered in Ontario. To assign patients to treatment groups, oxaliplatin cycles were captured from the first day of adjuvant treatment through 270 days later. Time zero (index date), the time from which each patient was followed for outcomes, was also set at 270 days after adjuvant initiation to avoid immortal time bias [22]. Based on provincial treatment standards and medical oncologist guidance, this window was sufficient to capture the full course of adjuvant therapy [23].

Patients who stopped oxaliplatin for over 16 weeks and subsequently resumed within the exposure window were excluded since they were likely being treated for recurrence. Patients who died, lost OHIP coverage, received 0 cycles of oxaliplatin, or received > 12 cycles of oxaliplatin during the 270-day exposure window were also excluded from analysis.

Outcome

The primary outcomes were time from index date to (1) FRI and (2) fracture. FRI was ascertained from NACRS and DAD using the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) cause of injury codes W00-W19 corresponding to any injury caused by a fall in emergency or inpatient records (e.g. ‘Fall on same level from slipping’) [24]. ICD-10 cause of injury codes always appear with another code corresponding to the type of injury sustained. The positive predictive value of this algorithm for falls is 0.91 (0.86 to 0.94) against a reference standard of chart abstraction [24]. As an alternative measure of FRI, fracture was ascertained from NACRS, DAD, and OHIP using ICD-10, Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI), and OHIP procedure billing codes (Online-only Table 2). For the fracture outcome, all fractures were included irrespective of the presence or absence of cause of injury codes. For each outcome, we were interested in the time to its first occurrence.

Covariates

We identified potential confounders based on clinical knowledge and existing literature (Online-only Table 2) [25, 26]. Lookback began at the time of the first adjuvant oxaliplatin treatment record and extended back 2 years for frailty, The Johns Hopkins ACG® System Version 10 Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADG) comorbidity score, osteoporosis, stroke, alcohol-related hospital visits, pre-treatment neuropathy, and pre-treatment FRI [27]. Age, sex, material deprivation index quintile, rurality, diabetes, and dementia were defined at the time of the first adjuvant oxaliplatin treatment record.

Age (continuous), sex, and rural residence were defined by the RPDB. Using the patient’s most recent address at the time of first oxaliplatin treatment, the Ontario Marginalization Index (ONMARG) defined patients’ dissemination area-level material deprivation index quintile [28]. The index includes measures of education, income, employment, housing quality, and family structure.

Cancer characteristics including the date of diagnosis, cancer site (proximal versus distal), and tumor risk (high-risk T4 or N2 versus low-risk T1-3 and N1) were ascertained from the OCR (Online-only Table 2). Treatment characteristics included time from diagnosis to surgery, time from surgery to adjuvant initiation, 30-day postoperative complications, adjuvant regimen, oxaliplatin dose reduction, and chemotherapy complications (Online-only Table 2).

We defined comorbidity level using ADG comorbidity score (continuous), calculated from weighted ADG categories derived using data from DAD, NACRS, and OHIP [29]. Frail patients were identified using the ACG® System Frailty flag, which defines patients as frail in the presence of diagnostic codes strongly associated with marked functional limitation [30]. Diabetes and dementia were ascertained from validated, ICES derived cohorts contained in the Ontario Diabetes Database and the DEMENTIA database, respectively [31]. Osteoporosis, stroke, and alcohol-related hospital visits were ascertained from OHIP, DAD, and NACRS databases using previously defined coding algorithms [32,33,34,35,36]. To identify pre-treatment FRI, we used the same coding algorithm used to ascertain FRI as an outcome [24]. Pre-treatment neuropathy was defined as at least one visit recorded in NACRS or DAD where the primary diagnostic code corresponded to neuropathy, consistent with a previous study of PN after treatment with oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy (Online-only Table 2) [34]. As the index date was taken to be 270 days after adjuvant treatment initiation, all covariates mentioned above were considered baseline (fixed) measures.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were summarized as means and categorical variables were summarized as proportions for the entire cohort and by exposure group. Standardized differences quantified imbalance between exposure groups. In the overall cohort, we calculated crude event rates per 100 person-years of follow-up and 95% confidence intervals based on lognormal distributions for each outcome.

Overlap weights accounted for confounding by baseline differences between those who received 50% and > 85% of a maximal course of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant therapy [37]. Propensity scores were first estimated using logistic regression, with treatment assignment as the binary dependent variable and including all patient characteristics as covariates. The estimated propensity score was then used to calculate the overlap weight. Adequacy of the propensity score specification was assessed using propensity score distributions, standardized differences (SD) < 0.10 indicating negligible imbalance, and cumulative distribution functions for continuous variables [38].

The subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) for the association between treatment with > 85% versus 50% of a maximal course of therapy and each outcome were estimated using overlap-weighted Fine and Gray regression models, with death treated as a competing risk. We chose the competing risk approach over the cause-specific approach as we are most interested in identifying population risk rather than establishing an etiological link [39]. Starting from the index date (270 days after adjuvant initiation), follow-up terminated at the outcome of interest, death, or censoring (loss of OHIP eligibility or end of follow-up [February 28 2022]), whichever came first. Outcomes occurring in the 270 days after adjuvant initiation (prior to the index date) were thus not included in the analysis.

Cumulative incidence functions (CIF), with death as a competing risk, were estimated to illustrate the risk for each outcome over time by exposure group. Robust variance estimators accounted for the overlap weighting procedure [40]. For each outcome, we tested for multiplicative and additive interaction between treatment group and potential effect modifiers of age at diagnosis, sex, and tumor risk [25]. To evaluate multiplicative interaction, we tested an interaction term of the effect modifier and oxaliplatin cycles. Additive interaction was evaluated by determining the p-value for the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) [41].

The missing indicator approach was used for handling missing deprivation quintile; the proportion missing was extremely small and was assumed to be missing not at random [42]. Complete cases were analyzed for missing rurality and tumor risk, as these were assumed to be missing completely at random.

All statistical tests were two-sided and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using SAS Enterprise Guide, version 7.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Sensitivity analyses

First, we evaluated the association between FRI and treatment with 50% versus 100% of a maximal course of therapy to examine for a dose effect. Second, as FRI may occur repeatedly for each patient throughout their observation window, we examined this outcome as a recurrent event. This was done by fitting overlap-weighted Andersen-Gill recurrent event regression models to estimate the relative rate of FRI [43]. Third, because of the potential for decay in the neurotoxic effect of oxaliplatin to act as a confounder, we included the number of days between the last oxaliplatin cycle and the index date as a fixed covariate in the overlap-weighted Fine and Gray subdistribution hazards regression model for FRI.

Results

After exclusions, 3,461 patients were included in the study, of whom 473 (13.7%) received 50% and 2,988 (86.3%) received > 85% of a maximal course of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant therapy (Fig. 1). In the unweighted cohort, those who received 50% of a maximal course of therapy were older (mean 61.8 years versus 60.0 years, SD 0.18), less often diagnosed with high-risk tumors (24.9% versus 54.3%, SD 0.63), less likely to experience an oxaliplatin dose reduction (23.0% versus 36.7%, SD 0.30), and more likely to be diagnosed later in the study period (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow diagram

Full size image
Table 1 Distributions of baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the cohort treated with > 85% or 50% of a maximal course of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy. In the weighted cohort, patients are weighted by the overlap propensity score weight
Full size table

In the analysis of post-treatment FRI, median follow-up was 4.6 years. Total follow-up was 17,968 person-years, during which 508 (14.7%) individuals experienced a FRI and 692 (20.0%) individuals died. The crude rate of post-treatment FRI in the cohort was 2.8 (95% CI 2.6 to 3.1) FRI per 100 person-years.

In the analysis of post-treatment fracture, median follow-up was 4.9 years. Total follow-up was 18,680 person-years, during which 301 (8.7%) individuals experienced a fracture and 733 (21.2%) individuals died. The crude rate of post-treatment fracture in the cohort was 1.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.8) fractures per 100 person-years). Forearm fractures were most common, followed by hip, rib, humerus, and ankle fractures (Table 2).

Table 2 Anatomic distribution of fractures, considering only first fractures
Full size table

In the overlap-weighted cohort, the distribution of weights was appropriate, all standardized differences were < 0.1, and cumulative distribution functions for continuous variables in each treatment group were qualitatively similar, indicating the PS was adequately specified.

The sHR obtained from the Fine and Gray regression model for the association of post-treatment FRI and treatment with > 85% of a maximal course of therapy was 0.84 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.13). The sHR for post-treatment fracture associated with receipt of > 85% of a maximal course of therapy was 0.72 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.06). The p-values for the tests of multiplicative and additive interaction for age, sex, and tumor risk were not statistically significant for either outcome. The estimated CIF for post-treatment FRI and fracture are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cumulative incidence function for post-treatment fall-related injuries stratified by treatment group, with death as a competing risk and after applying overlap weights. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. Cumulative incidence functions illustrate the proportion of patients having experienced the event of interest over time, with the denominator being all patients at risk for the event at all points in time

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Cumulative incidence function for post-treatment fractures stratified by treatment group, with death as a competing risk and after applying overlap weights. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. Cumulative incidence functions illustrate the proportion of patients having experienced the event of interest over time, with the denominator being all patients at risk for the event at all points in time

Full size image

Sensitivity analyses

Our estimates were similar when we compared treatment with 50% versus 100% of a maximal course of therapy, accounted for recurrent events using Andersen-Gill models, or included days between the last oxaliplatin cycle and time zero of follow-up in the overlap-weighted Fine and Gray subdistribution hazards model (data not shown).

Discussion

Concern for elevated risk of post-treatment FRI and fracture with longer durations of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy is grounded in biological plausibility, clinical experience, and limited existing research linking oxaliplatin, PN, and FRI [10, 11, 15, 17, 18, 34]. In this population-based retrospective cohort study of 3,461 patients with stage III colon cancer, post-treatment FRI and fracture were common in patients who received 50% or > 85% of a maximal course of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy. However, we did not find that patients who received > 85% of a maximal course were at increased risk of post-treatment FRI or fracture compared to those who received only 50% of a maximal course, and this finding held across tumor risk, sex, and age.

Our study builds on four observational studies that examined the association between chemotherapy-associated PN and risk of self-reported falls [14,15,16,17,18]. Most similar to the present study is a population-based observational study using SEER-Medicare data that compared the rate of falls among cancer patients who received neurotoxic versus non-neurotoxic chemotherapy [18]. In their stratified analysis of patients with colorectal cancer, they found a hazard ratio for FRI of 1.14 comparing receipt of any neurotoxic agent against no neurotoxic agents, raising the question of whether greater extent of oxaliplatin treatment might increase the risk of FRI.

Yet, this hypothesis is not borne out in our results. Instead, our findings support the idea that the rate of FRI requiring medical care and fracture is similar within a cohort of patients with colon cancer who all received adjuvant oxaliplatin for durations relevant to the post-IDEA era. Potential mechanisms for this finding include the possibility that chemotherapy prescribers can identify those patients who would be tolerant of longer durations of chemotherapy without dramatically reducing their functional status or increasing their risk of FRI. Patients who receive more therapy may also recognize their neuropathy and take effective compensatory measures to avoid post-treatment FRI [44].

Several aspects may explain why the findings of the SEER-Medicare study differed from our observations. First, the study compared neurotoxic versus non-neurotoxic chemotherapy, rather than exploring the risk of falls within a cohort of patients who all received neurotoxic chemotherapy but of differing durations. Second, the SEER-Medicare cohort included patients with advanced cancer, potentially increasing the frailty of their population and subsequently the rate of FRI associated with neurotoxic chemotherapy. Third, our outcomes differed, where we used injuries with a fall-related mechanism and the previous study used injury codes without a specific mechanism (e.g. ‘Concussion with no loss of consciousness’).

Our study has numerous strengths. We included patients who had all received adjuvant oxaliplatin, contributing to the ongoing examination of the costs and benefits of differing durations of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer. By using an overlap-weighting approach, we accounted for baseline between-group differences in important patient characteristics. Our landmark analysis mitigated immortal time bias, and the subdistribution hazards model addressed the substantial competing risk of death. Our findings were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. Effect modifiers were thoroughly explored using tests for multiplicative and additive interaction. Finally, our study benefited from an extended duration of follow-up and the reliable capture of events resulting in hospital presentation from high-quality linked databases drawing on a population-based sample.

Several limitations of our study should be acknowledged. Our datasets capture only the most clinically significant FRI that require interaction with the healthcare system, which is not exhaustive of the total burden of post-treatment FRI [15, 45]. Partially measured and unmeasured covariates, including physical activity, visual acuity, and seizure disorder may be common causes of both a patient’s likelihood of continuing treatment and post-treatment FRI, biasing the long treatment group toward a lower rate of FRI [46]. Lastly, our data were compatible with a sHR for FRI as high as 1.13 and thus an association between FRI and longer durations of therapy cannot be definitively ruled out, despite our population-based approach and long-term follow-up. This underscores the need for future evidence syntheses of large, high-quality studies to better define this potential association.

Conclusion

In our population-based retrospective cohort study of 3,461 patients treated with oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer, treatment with > 85% of a maximal course of therapy was not associated with a significant increase the rate of post-treatment FRI or fracture over treatment with 50% of a maximal course. Though oxaliplatin is known to cause peripheral neuropathy in a dose-dependent fashion, longer durations of treatment do not appear to translate into elevated population rates of post-treatment FRI or fracture in the context of routine practice.

Data availability

The dataset from this study is held securely in coded form at ICES. While legal data sharing agreements between ICES and data providers (e.g., healthcare organizations and government) prohibit ICES from making the dataset publicly available, access may be granted to those who meet pre-specified criteria for confidential access, available at www.ices.on.ca/DAS (email: das@ices.on.ca). The full dataset creation plan and underlying analytic code are available from the authors upon request, understanding that the computer programs may rely upon coding templates or macros that are unique to ICES and are therefore either inaccessible or may require modification.

References

  1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Colon Cancer - Version 3.2021. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6165-1_18.

  2. Argilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, et al. Localised colon cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1291–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mols F, Beijers T, Lemmens V, et al. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and its association with quality of life among 2- to 11-year colorectal cancer survivors: results from the population-based PROFILES registry. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2699–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Land SR, Kopec JA, Cecchini RS, et al. Neurotoxicity from oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2205–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pachman DR, Qin R, Seisler DK, et al. Clinical course of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy: results from the randomized phase III trial N08CB (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3416–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beijers AJM, Mols F, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in colorectal cancer survivors: the influence of oxaliplatin administration. Results from the population-based PROFILES registry. Acta Oncol (Madr). 2015;54:463–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gill TM, Allore HG, Holford TR, et al. Hospitalization, restricted activity, and the development of disability among older persons. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;292:2115–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S, et al. Fall-Induced deaths among Elderly people. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:422–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Medical Advisory Secretariat. Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8:1–78.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson JK, Hurvitz EA. Peripheral neuropathy: a true risk factor for falls. Journals Gerontology: Med Sci. 1995;50:211–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson JK, Ashton-Miller JA, Lee SG, et al. Moderate peripheral neuropathy impairs weight transfer and unipedal balance in. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1152–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. André T, Meyerhardt J, Iveson T, et al. Effect of duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer (IDEA collaboration): final results from a prospective, pooled analysis of six randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1620–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu IS, Pereira AAL, Lee M, et al. Medical oncologists’ perspectives on how the results of the IDEA collaboration impact the adjuvant treatment of stage III Colon cancer. Oncologist. 2020;25:229–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tofthagen C, Overcash J, Kip K. Falls in persons with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:583–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolb NA, Smith AG, Singleton JR, et al. The association of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms and the risk of falling. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:860–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Winters-Stone KM, Horak F, Jacobs PG, et al. Falls, Functioning, and disability among women with persistent symptoms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2604–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gewandter JS, Fan L, Magnuson A, et al. Falls and functional impairments in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): a University of Rochester CCOP study. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:2059–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ward PR, Wong MD, Moore R, et al. Fall-related injuries in elderly cancer patients treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2014;5:57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, et al. The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015;12:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robles SC, Marrett LD, Aileen Clarke E, et al. An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:495–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grothey A, Sobrero AF, Shields AF, et al. Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1177–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mi X, Hammill BG, Curtis LH, et al. Use of the landmark method to address immortal person-time bias in comparative effectiveness research: a simulation study. Stat Med. 2016;35:4824–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wasserman DW, Boulos M, Hopman WM, et al. Reasons for delay in time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11:e28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Welk B, McArther E, Fraser L-A, et al. The risk of fall and fracture with the initiation of a prostate-selective α antagonist: a population based cohort study. Br Med J. 2015;351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.040.

  25. Peeters G, Cooper R, Tooth L, et al. A comprehensive assessment of risk factors for falls in middle-aged adults: co-ordinated analyses of cohort studies in four countries. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30:2099–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. World Health Organization. WHO Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age. Geneva, Switzerland 2007. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2004.0010.

  27. Johns Hopkins University. The Johns Hopkins ACG System version 10.0 Technical Reference Guide, Baltimore. MD 2011. https://www.hopkinsacg.org/document/acg-system-version-10-0-technical-reference-guide/.

  28. Matheson F, Moloney G, van Ingen T. 2016 Ontario Marginalization Index User Guide. 2018.

  29. Austin PC, Van Walraven C. The mortality risk score and the ADG score: two points-based scoring systems for the Johns Hopkins aggregated diagnosis groups to predict mortality in a general adult population cohort in Ontario, Canada. Med Care. 2011;49:940–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergman H, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J, et al. Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm - issues and controversies. Journals Gerontol - Ser Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:731–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lipscombe LL, Hwee J, Webster L, et al. Identifying diabetes cases from administrative data: a population-based validation study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hall R, Mondor L, Porter J, et al. Accuracy of administrative data for the coding of acute stroke and TIAs. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43:765–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kokotailo RA, Hill MD. Coding of stroke and stroke risk factors using international classification of diseases, revisions 9 and 10. Stroke. 2005;36:1776–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Raphael MJ, Fischer HD, Fung K, et al. Neurotoxicity outcomes in a Population-based Cohort of Elderly patients treated with adjuvant oxaliplatin for Colorectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017;16:397–e4041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hulme J, Sheikh H, Xie E, et al. Mortality among patients with frequent emergency department use for alcohol-related reasons in Ontario: a population-based cohort study. CMAJ. 2020;192:1522–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Raman-Wilms L, et al. Osteoporosis quality indicators using healthcare utilization data. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:1335–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomas LE, Li F, Pencina MJ. Overlap weighting: a propensity score method that mimics attributes of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;323:2417–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34:3661–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lau B, Cole SR, Gange SJ. Competing risk regression models for epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:244–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Joffe MM, Ten Have TR, Feldman HI, et al. Model selection, confounder control, and marginal structural models: review and new applications. Am Stat. 2004;58:272–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Knol MJ, VanderWeele TJ. Recommendations for presenting analyses of effect modification and interaction. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:514–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Choi J, Dekkers OM, le Cessie S. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34:23–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rogers JK, Yaroshinsky A, Pocock SJ, et al. Analysis of recurrent events with an associated informative dropout time: application of the joint frailty model. Stat Med. 2016;35:2195–205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Public Health Agency of Canada. Seniors’ Falls in Canada: Second Report. 2014.

  45. O’Loughlin JL, Robitaille Y, Boivin JF, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for falls and injurious falls among the community-dwelling elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:342–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mohile SG, Magnuson A, Pandya C, et al. Community oncologists’ decision-making for treatment of older patients with cancer. JNCCN J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2018;16:301–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this work was presented as an online poster at the American Society of Clinical Oncology GI Cancers Symposium, San Francisco, CA, January 20–22, 2022. We thank IQVIA Solutions Canada Inc. for use of their Drug Information File. We thank Yosuf Kaliwal and Ning Liu for their assistance in obtaining and preparing the data. We thank the Toronto Community Health Profiles Partnership for providing access to the Ontario Marginalization Index.

Funding

This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Ministry of Long-Term Care (MLTC). Funding for this study was also provided by the PSI Foundation and a CIHR Foundation Grant (#148470). This document used data adapted from the Statistics Canada Postal CodeOM Conversion File, which is based on data licensed from Canada Post Corporation, and/or data adapted from the Ontario Ministry of Health Postal Code Conversion File, which contains data copied under license from ©Canada Post Corporation and Statistics Canada. Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by: the Ontario Ministry of Health, Ontario Health, the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the Ontario Community Health Profiles Partnership, and the Ontario Registrar General. The original source of Ontario Registrar General information on deaths is ServiceOntario. The analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect those of the funding or data sources; no endorsement is intended or should be inferred.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Colin Sue-Chue-Lam

  2. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Colin Sue-Chue-Lam, Christine Brezden-Masley, Rinku Sutradhar, Amy Ying Xin Yu & Nancy Noel Baxter

  3. Division of Medical Oncology, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada

    Christine Brezden-Masley

  4. ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Rinku Sutradhar, Amy Ying Xin Yu & Nancy Noel Baxter

  5. Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Amy Ying Xin Yu

  6. Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Nancy Noel Baxter

  7. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Nancy Noel Baxter

  8. Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St. Level 5, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia

    Nancy Noel Baxter

Authors
  1. Colin Sue-Chue-Lam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine Brezden-Masley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rinku Sutradhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amy Ying Xin Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nancy Noel Baxter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: C.S. and N.N.B.; Data curation: C.S.; Formal analysis: C.S.; Funding acquisition: C.S. and N.N.B.; Methodology: C.S., C.B., R.S., A.Y.Y. and N.N.B.; Supervision: N.N.B.; Writing – original draft: C.S.; Writing - review & editing: C.B., R.S., A.Y.Y. and N.N.B. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Noel Baxter.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to Participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The Research Ethics Board at St. Michael’s Hospital (#20–256) and the Office of Research Ethics at the University of Toronto (#40355) waived the requirement for informed consent and provided approval for the present study.

Consent to Publish

Not Applicable (NA).

Competing interests

Dr. Brezden​-Masley received grants from Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca; consultancy fees from Hoffman-La Roche, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Pfizer, Taiho, Gilead Sciences, Beigene, Astellas, Astra Zeneca and Seagen; speaker fees from: Novartis, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, Astellas, Astra Zeneca and Seagen. All other authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sue-Chue-Lam, C., Brezden-Masley, C., Sutradhar, R. et al. Association of oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant duration with post-treatment fall-related injury and fracture in patients with stage III colon cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 24, 878 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12558-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12558-2

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us