Skip to main content
Download PDF

Astragaloside IV inhibits cell viability and glycolysis of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating KAT2A-mediated succinylation of PGAM1

BMC Cancer volume 24, Article number: 682 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Astragaloside IV (AS-IV) is one of the basic components of Astragali radix, that has been shown to have preventive effects against various diseases, including cancers. This study aimed to explore the role of AS-IV in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its underlying mechanism.

Methods

The cell viability, glucose consumption, lactate production, and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in SNU-182 and Huh7 cell lines were detected by specific commercial kits. Western blot was performed to analyze the succinylation level in SNU-182 and Huh7 cell lines. The interaction between lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) 2 A and phosphoglycerate mutase 1 (PGAM1) was evaluated by co-immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence assays. The role of KAT2A in vivo was explored using a xenografted tumor model.

Results

The results indicated that AS-IV treatment downregulated the protein levels of succinylation and KAT2A in SNU-182 and Huh7 cell lines. The cell viability, glucose consumption, lactate production, ECAR, and succinylation levels were decreased in AS-IV-treated SNU-182 and Huh7 cell lines, and the results were reversed after KAT2A overexpression. KAT2A interacted with PGAM1 to promote the succinylation of PGAM1 at K161 site. KAT2A overexpression promoted the viability and glycolysis of SNU-182 and Huh7 cell lines, which were partly blocked following PGAM1 inhibition. In tumor-bearing mice, AS-IV suppressed tumor growth though inhibiting KAT2A-mediated succinylation of PGAM1.

Conclusion

AS-IV inhibited cell viability and glycolysis in HCC by regulating KAT2A-mediated succinylation of PGAM1, suggesting that AS-IV might be a potential and suitable therapeutic agent for treating HCC.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a globally threatening cancer worldwide with increasing incidence and mortality, typically developing after liver cirrhosis [1]. HCC is prone to recurrence and metastasis with a 5-year survival rate of 18%, which is much lower than other common cancers [2]. Risk factors for HCC include metabolic liver disorders, alcohol addiction, hereditary hepatitis, and exposure to dietary toxins. Statistical estimations revealed that the global mortality from HCC is expected to reach one million annually worldwide by 2030 [3]. Early HCC can be managed with local ablation, surgical resection, or liver transplantation; but unfortunately, most HCC has been found in the middle or later stages because the liver is not sensitive to pain. Treatment options for patients with advanced HCC are limited in terms of availability and effectiveness [4]. Thus, investigating and exploring novel treatment strategies for HCC is imperative.

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been recognized worldwide due to its natural origin, low toxicity, limited side effects, and multiple curative effects [5]. Astragaloside IV (AS-IV, 3-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-6-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl cycloastragenol) is a natural saponin extracted from Astragali radix [6], with numerous reported protective therapeutic effects in heart failure [7], diabetic nephropathy [8], neurological disorders [9], and cancers [6, 10]. The role of AS-IV in liver-related diseases has been described previously. For example, AS-IV suppresses oxidative stress by inhibiting the activation of the nuclear factor-κB signal pathway, thereby improving rat liver function and alleviating alcoholic fatty liver disease [11]. AS-IV has also been found to regulate inflammation to protect against lipopolysaccharide-induced liver injury [12], and possesses excellent potential in suppressing HCC progression and metastasis [13, 14].

In recent years, succinylation modification has become a hotspot in post-translational modification research, which regulates the structure of proteins by transferring succinyl groups (-CO-CH2-CH2-CO2H) to residues of target proteins [15]. Succinylation is involved in various physiological processes including mitochondrial metabolism, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and gene regulation [16]. Dysregulation of succinylation is associated with the malignant progression of multiple diseases, including cardiovascular disease [17], metabolic disease [18], and cancers [19]. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 A (CPT1A) succinylates lactate dehydrogenase A, thus promoting the invasion and proliferation of gastric cancer [20]. Down-regulation of sirtuin (SIRT) 5, a desuccinylation enzyme, is associated with the increased succinylation and DNA oxidative damage in HCC [21]. Lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) 2 A, acts as a succinyltransferase, and can be coupled with the metabolic enzyme complex α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, affecting the proliferation and formation of tumors [22]. However, the succinylation in HCC has been scarcely studied.

Glycolysis is the common stage through which all organisms undergo glucose catabolism, and impaired glycolysis has been reported to have a a pathological effect on the onset and progression of various diseases, including tumors [23,24,25]. Cancer cell metabolic reprogramming shows an increase in glycolytic dependence to meet the anabolic needs of cancer cell proliferation [26]. Glycolysis affects tumor proliferation, invasion, microenvironment, and chemotherapy resistance [27]. Previous studies have observed elevated glycolytic activity and lactic acid level in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [28, 29]. Nevertheless, the effect of glycolysis in HCC remains unknown.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of AS-IV on cell viability and glycolysis in HCC and further explored the underlying mechanism, which might provide a molecular basis for potential targeted HCC therapies.

Methods and materials

Cell culture

The SNU-182 and Huh7 cell lines were purchased from Suncell Biotechnology Co., LTD (Wuhan, China). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Biowit Technology Co., LTD, Shenzhen, China) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Thermo Fisher). Primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) were obtained from ZEPING Bioscience&Technology Co., LTD (Beijing, China) and cultured in hepatocytes plating medium (ZEPING). The incubated environmental requirement of all cells was 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.

AS-IV treatment

AS-IV (MedChemExpress, Shanghai, China; C41H68O14, molecular weight: 784.9702; purity > 98%) was dissolved in normal saline (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) containing 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Beyotime). The PHHs, SNU-182, and Huh7 cells were treated with different doses (0, 10, 20, and 40 µg/mL) of AS-IV (Fig. 1A) for 12 h [30].

Fig. 1
figure 1

AS-IV inhibited the cell viability of SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. (A) The chemical structure of AS-IV; (B) The cell viability of PHHs, Huh7, and SNU182 cell lines treated with different concentrations (0, 10, 20, and 40 µg/mL) of AS-IV was detected by MTT assay. ***P < 0.001 and **P < 0.01 vs. the 0 µg/ml group. AS-IV, Astragaloside IV; PHHs, primary human hepatocytes; MTT, 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di- phenytetrazoliumromide

Full size image

Cell transfection

PGAM1 small hairpin (sh) RNA (sh-PGAM1), shRNA negative control (sh-NC), KAT2A overexpression vector (oe-KAT2A), and empty vector (oe-NC) used in this study were purchased from Genewiz Biotechnology Co., LTD (Suzhou, China). The SNU-182 and Huh7 cells (1 × 107 cells/well) were inoculated in six-well plates (Beyotime). Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Yeason Biotechnology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions when the cell confluence reached about 80%. The cells were transfected for 48 h. After that, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to detect the transfection efficiency. The knockdown sequences were as follows: sh-PGAM1, 5’-GGCACAGGTATTTGGCCTCAG-3’, and sh-NC, 5’-TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3’.

Mutation of succinylation sites

Firstly, the GPSuc database (http://kurata14.bio.kyutech.ac.jp/GPSuc/index.php) was used to screen succinylation sites of PGAM1, and three possible PGAM1 succinylation sites, K85, K98, and K161 were chosen. Arginine mutations were introduced at K85 (K85R), K98 (K98R), and K161 (K161R) sites of PGAM1. The K85R, K98R, and K161R plasmids were designed by Genscript Biotechnology Co., LTD (Nanjing, China) and transfected into SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines for 24 h.

3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di- phenytetrazoliumromide (MTT) assay

MTT assay was performed using a commercial kit (Baiyue Biotechnology Co., LTD, Zhuji, China) to assess cell viability as previously described [31]. Briefly, 1 × 104 cells were plated into 96-well plates and cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. Then, 10 µL MTT solution was added to each well. The cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 4 h followed 100 µL formazan solution added after removing the supernatant carefully. Subsequently, the 96-well plate was placed on the oscillator (Dam industry Co., LTD, Shanghai, China) at 300 rpm/min for 10 min to dissolve the formazan completely. Finally, the OD values were measured at 570 nm by the microplate reader (Thermo Fisher).

Western blot

The lysis buffer (Beyotime) was added to cells to extract the protein. The homogenate was homogenized in an ice bath, shaken at 4℃ for 2 h, and then centrifuged (12,000 rpm) at 4℃ for 20 min. The supernatant was then taken and stored at -80℃. The Bradford assay (Solarbio, Beijing, China) was performed to detect the protein concentration. Then, 10% SDS-PAGE (Detai Bioengineering Co. LTD., Nanjing, China) was used to separate the protein (50 µg). The protein was subsequently transferred to PVDF membrane (Detai). The membrane was blocked in 5% skim milk for 1 h, and incubated with the primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. After that, the membrane was washed three times with Tris-buffered saline Tween (TBST, Beyotime), and the secondary antibody was incubated with the membrane at 25 °C for 1 h. Finally, protein signal detection was performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence solution (Solarbio). The used antibodies were listed as follows: succinyllysine (PTM Biolabs, Hangzhou, China; PTM-401; 1/1000), KAT2A (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; ab217876; 1/1000), KAT3B (Abcam; ab275378; 1/1000), CPT1A (Abcam; ab220789; 1/1000), SIRT5 (Abcam; ab259967; 1/1000), SIRT7 (Abcam; ab259968; 1/1000), PGAM1 (Abcam; ab288376; 1/1000), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Abcam; ab181602; 1/10,000), and goat anti-rabbit IgG (Abcam; ab205718; 1/5000).

RT-qPCR

Firstly, TRIzol reagent (Solarbio) was used to extract total RNA from cells. Then, RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Evo M-MLV RT Kit for qPCR (Accurate Biology, Changsha, China), and the qPCR amplification experiment was performed using the SYBR Green Premix Pro Taq HS qPCR Kit (Accurate) with the reaction conditions: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and a dissociation stage. The gene expression was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method. Primers used in the present study are listed as follows: lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) 2 A, forward, 5′-GCAAGGCCAATGAAACCTGTA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCCAAGTGGGATACGTGGTCA-3′; phosphoglycerate mutase 1 (PGAM1), forward, 5′-TTGAATACAGCGACCCAGTGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTATCGATGTACAGCCGAATGGTG-3′; glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 5′-GACTCATGACCACAGTCCATGC-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTCTG-3′.

Glucose consumption measurement

Glucose consumption in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines was analyzed using the Screen Quest Colorimetric Glucose Uptake Assay Kit (AAT Bioquest, USA) as previously described [32]. The cells were cultured in DMEM on 96-well plates, washed with Krebs-Ringer-Phosphate-HEPES (KRPH) buffer, and incubated in 90 µL/well of Glucose Uptake Buffer for 1 h. Subsequently, cells were exposed to 10 µL/well of 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) of 10 mM for 40 min. After that, cells were washed with KRPH buffer and lysed. Finally, 50 µL of the Uptake Assay Mixure was added to each sample and the absorbance ratio was read at 570 nm wavelength.

Lactate production measurement

For measurement of lactate level, transfected 1 × 105 SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines were seeded into six-well plates. The lactate level in the cell-cultured medium was quantified using the lactate assay kit (Abbkine Biotechnology Co., LTD, Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sample absorbance at 530 nm was detected using the Synergy HTX Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Agilent Technology Co. LTD., Beijing, China). The Bradford assay was used to measure protein content and the results were normalized to corresponding protein amounts.

Measurement of extracellular acidification rate (ECAR)

The glycolytic stress test kit (Seahorse Bioscience, Agilent) was used for ECAR detection. Briefly, the cells were plated at 1 × 105 cells/well in the Seahorse XF cell culture microplate. After calibration of the analyzer, sequential compound injections, including glucose, oligomycin, and 2-DG at final concentrations of 10 mM, 0.5 µM, and 50 mM were applied to test glycolytic activity. Post assay, wells were washed, cells lysed, and the Bradford assay was performed to analyze protein content. These readouts were normalized to corresponding protein amounts. The ECAR of SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines were analyzed using the Seahorse XFe24 Flux Analyzer.

Immunofluorescence (IF) staining

IF assay was performed to observe the distribution of KAT2A and PGAM1 in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. The cells growing on the glass slide were soaked in phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH 7.4, Sigma) for 3 times, and fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) for 15 min. Next, the sections were rinsed three times with PBS, and incubated with KAT2A and PGAM1 antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with the secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Then, the sections were mounted with Antifade Mounting solution containing 10 mg/mL 4’6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Beyotime). Representative visual fields were acquired using a Leica DM5000 B microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The used antibodies were listed as follows: KAT2A (Abcam; ab153903; 1/500), PGAM1 (Proteintech Group, Wuhan, China; 16126-1-AP; 1/100), and goat anti-rabbit IgG (Abcam; ab150077; 1/500).

Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay

The interaction relationship between KAT2A and PGAM1 in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines was detected by Co-IP assay. The cells were lysed on ice in Radio Immunoprecipitation Assay Lysis (RIPA, Sigma) buffer containing protease inhibitors for 30 min. Then, the supernatant was collected, and a small amount of it was taken as the input group. KAT2A, PGAM1, or lgG antibody (2 µg) was added into the remaining supernatant and incubated at 4 °C overnight. The protein A agarose beads (Abcam) were washed with appropriate lysis buffer (Sigma) three times. The pre-treated 10 µL protein A agarose beads were then added to the cell lysate and antibody complex and slowly shaken at 4℃ for 2 h to make the antibody conjugated with the protein A agarose beads. After the immunoprecipitation reaction, the complex was centrifuged at 4 °C, 3,000 rpm for 3 min. Next, the supernatant was discarded and the agarose beads were washed with 1 mL of lysis buffer three times. Finally, 15 µL of 2 × SDS loading buffer (Sigma) was added and boiled for 5 min. The precipitated protein was then analyzed using western blot assay. The used antibodies were listed as follows: KAT2A (Abcam; ab217876; 1/30), PGAM1 (Thermo Fisher; PA5-112233; 2 µL/mg of lysate), and goat anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher; 31,460; 1/1000).

Protein stability assessment

Protein stability assessment was performed to verify the protein stability of PGAM1 after KAT2A overexpressing in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. The cells were treated with cycloheximide (CHX, 100 µg/mL, Abcam), a protein translation inhibitor, and the protein level of PGAM1 at different time points (0, 8, 16, and 24 h) was detected. The used antibodies were listed as follows: PGAM1 (Abcam; ab288376; 1/1000), GAPDH (Abcam; ab181602; 1/10,000), and goat anti-rabbit IgG (Abcam; ab205718; 1/5000).

Animal study

A total of 24 male BALB/c (6 weeks old) mice were purchased from Charles River (Beijing, China) and housed in cages with 24℃, a 12 h alternating light/dark cycle and free access to water and food. After one-week adaptive feeding, the mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 6 per group): control, AS-IV, AS-IV + Lentivirus negative control (LV-NC), and AS-IV + LV-KAT2A. Huh7 cells were infected with LV-NC and LV-KAT2A and adjusted cell density at 5 × 107 cells/mL. The mice were subcutaneously injected with 100 µL LV-NC-infected or LV-KAT2A-infected Huh7 cells to establish a tumor-bearing mouse model. When the tumors reached about 50 mm3, AS-IV group mice were administered with AS-IV (40 mg/kg [33]) once a day via gavage. The control group mice were treated with the same amount of normal saline. Tumor volume was measured using a vernier caliper every week and quantified using the formula: Volume (mm3) =(length × width2)/2. After the fourth measurement of tumor volume, the mice were sacrificed. The tumors were isolated from all mice and weighed.

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining

Following fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, tumor tissues were embedded in paraffin and then transversely cut into 4 μm slices. For H&E staining, tissue sections were subjected to dewaxing with xylene, rehydration by gradient ethanol and then dyed with the H&E staining kit (Beyotime) obeying product manuals recommended by the supplier.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay

Tumor tissue paraffin Sect. (4 μm) were incubated with anti-PGAM1 (Abcam, ab279384, 1/500) at 4 °C overnight followed by incubating with the secondary antibody (Abcam, ab205719, 1/5000) at room temperature for 0.5 h. Then, the sections were stained with diaminobenzidine solution for 3 min at room temperature. After washing using moving water and sealing, the images were visualized under a microscope.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS 21.0 software was used to analyze data. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student’s t-test was used for comparison between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison among groups. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (v8.0.1, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). p < 0.05 indicates that the difference is statistically significant.

Results

AS-IV inhibited the cell viability of SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines

In previous HCC studies, AS-IV was used at different concentrations [34, 35]. Thus, in order to choose the optimal concentration for this study, different HCC cell lines (PHHs, SNU182, and Huh7) were treated with different concentrations of AS-IV, and the cell viability was then determined by MTT assay. Results showed that AS-IV treatment showed no effects on cell viability of PHHs cell lines. Besides, the cell viability of SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines was decreased with the increasing concentration of AS-IV (0, 10, and 20 µg/mL), and 40 µg/mL could not further inhibit cell viability (Fig. 1B). Hence, AS-IV at the concentration of 20 µg/mL was chosen for further studies.

AS-IV treatment decreased glycolysis in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines

A previous review indicates that the carcinogenic regulation of glycolysis and the multifaceted roles of glycolysis components emphasize the biological significance of tumor glycolysis [36]. Whereas, the role of AS-IV in glycolysis has only been studied in breast cancer [37]. Therefore, we focused on the glycolysis effect of AS-IV on HCC in this study. The results showed that AS-IV-treated SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines decreased glucose consumption (Fig. 2A), lactate production (Fig. 2B), and ECAR (Fig. 2C) compared with the control group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

AS-IV treatment decreased glycolysis in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. The (A) glucose consumption, (B) lactate production, and (C) ECAR of SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines were detected by specific commercial kits in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. ***P < 0.001 vs. the CON group. AS-IV, Astragaloside IV; ECAR, extracellular acidification rate

Full size image

AS-IV treatment decreased succinylation level and KAT2A protein level in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines

Previous research elucidates the role of succinylation in the regulation of glycolysis in HCC [38]. However, the role of AS-IV in succinylation has not been found. In the present study, AS-IV-treated SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines showed downregulated succinylation level compared with the control group (Fig. 3A). Western blot was used to further explore which succinylation enzymes affected succinylation level in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. The results showed that the protein level of KAT2A was suppressed and that of KAT3B, CPT1A, SIRT5, and SIRT7 were not altered in AS-IV-treated SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines compared with the control group (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

AS-IV treatment decreased succinylation level and KAT2A protein level in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. (A) The succinylation level of SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines was detected by western blot; (B) Western blot was used to analyze the protein levels of KAT2A, KAT3B, CPT1A, SIRT5, and SIRT7 in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. AS-IV, Astragaloside IV; KAT2A, lysine acetyltransferase 2 A; KAT3B, lysine acetyltransferase 3B; CPT1A, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 A; SIRT, sirtuin

Full size image

Overexpression of KAT2A reversed the decreased cell viability and glycolysis in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines caused by AS-IV treatment

To further explore the effects of KAT2A on HCC cellular processes, KAT2A overexpression plasmid was transfected into SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines, which resulted in an increased KAT2A mRNA level (Fig. 4A). Overexpression of KAT2A reversed the downregulated cell viability (Fig. 4B), glucose consumption (Fig. 4C), lactate production (Fig. 4D), and ECAR (Fig. 4E) caused by AS-IV treatment in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Overexpression of KAT2A reversed the decreased cell viability and glycolysis in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines caused by AS-IV treatment. (A) The transfection efficiency of oe-KAT2A in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines was detected by RT-qPCR; (B) The cell viability of each group was detected by MTT assay; The (C) glucose consumption, (D) lactate production, and E) ECAR in each group were analyzed by specific commercial kits in each group in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. ***P < 0.001 and **P < 0.01 vs. the oe-NC or CON group; ##P < 0.01 vs. the AS-IV + oe-NC group. AS-IV, Astragaloside IV; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; KAT2A, lysine acetyltransferase 2 A; MTT, 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di- phenytetrazoliumromide; ECAR, extracellular acidification rate

Full size image

PGAM1 was succinylated at K161 site

In order to detect the dependence of astragaloside IV activity on KAT2A-mediated succinylation, the SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines were transfected with sh-NC, sh-KAT2A, oe-NC, and oe-KAT2A plasmids. The results indicated that inhibition of KAT2A downregulated the protein levels of PGAM1 and PGAM1-suc in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. Whereas, AS-IV treatment did not change the protein levels of PGAM1 and PGAM1-suc in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines when KAT2A was knockdown (Fig. 5A-C), implying that KAT2A may lead to increased PGAM1 succinylation. Besides, KAT2A overexpression upregulated the protein levels of PGAM1 and PGAM1-suc in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines (Fig. 6A). Co-IP assay demonstrated that KAT2A interacted with PGAM1 in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines (Fig. 6B). IF staining suggested that KAT2A co-located with PGAM1 in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines (Fig. 6C). The protein levels of PGAM1-suc and PGAM1 protein were decreased when the SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines were co-transfected with K161R rather than K85R and K98R, suggesting that PGAM1 was succinylated at K161 site (Fig. 6D). Protein stability assay revealed that overexpression of KAT2A enhanced the protein stability of PGAM1 in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines compared to the control group (Fig. 6E).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Inhibition of KAT2A downregulated the protein levels of PGAM1 and PGAM1-suc in SNU182 and Huh7 cell line. (A) Western blot was performed to analyze the protein levels of PGAM1 and PGAM1-suc in each group; (B) Quantification of Western blot results. KAT2A, lysine acetyltransferase 2 A; PGAM1, phosphoglycerate mutase 1; suc, succinylation

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

PGAM1 was succinylated at K161 site. (A) The protein levels of PGAM1-suc and PGAM1 in each group in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines were analyzed by western blot; (B) Co-IP assay was used to analyze the interaction between KAT2A and PGAM1 in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines; (C) The protein distribution of KAT2A and PGAM1 in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines was analyzed by IF assay; (D) Western blot was used to determine the succinylation site of PGAM1; (E) The protein stability of PGAM1 was assayed by western blot at the different time points (0, 8, 16, and 24 h) after KAT2A overexpression. KAT2A, lysine acetyltransferase 2 A; PGAM1, phosphoglycerate mutase 1; Co-IP, co-immunoprecipitation; IF, immunofluorescence

Full size image

PGAM1 inhibition restored the increased cell viability and glycolysis in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines caused by KAT2A overexpression

To further explore the effects of KAT2A and PGAM1 on glycolysis in HCC, KAT2A overexpression and PGAM1 knockdown plasmids were transfected into SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. The PGAM1 expression was downregulated after sh-PGAM1 transfection (Fig. 7A). PGAM1 inhibition restored the increased cell viability (Fig. 7B), glucose consumption (Fig. 7C), lactate production (Fig. 7D), and ECAR (Fig. 7E) caused by KAT2A overexpression in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines.

Fig. 7
figure 7

PGAM1 inhibition restored the increased cell viability and glycolysis in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines caused by KAT2A overexpression. (A) The transfection efficiency of sh-KAT2A in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines was detected by RT-qPCR; (B) The cell viability of each group was detected by MTT assay; The (C) glucose consumption, (D) lactate production, and (E) ECAR in each group were analyzed by specific commercial kits in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. ***P < 0.001 and **P < 0.01 vs. the sh-NC or AS-IV + oe-NC + sh-NC group; ##P < 0.01 vs. the AS-IV + oe-KAT2A + sh-NC group. AS-IV, Astragaloside IV; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; KAT2A, lysine acetyltransferase 2 A; MTT, 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di- phenytetrazoliumromide; ECAR, extracellular acidification rate

Full size image

AS-IV suppressed tumor growth though inhibiting KAT2A-mediated succinylation of PGAM1

Finally, we established the tumor-bearing mouse model to explore the role of AS-IV and KAT2A in vivo. The results showed that AS-IV reduced tumor size and weight compared with the control group, while KAT2A overexpression reversed the effects induced by AS-IV (Fig. 8A-C). H&E results showed that tumor cells in the control group were plump and intact, with large nuclei. After treatment with AS-IV, the tumor cells exhibited a large necrotic region and were stained darker, while the results were reversed after KAT2A overexpression (Fig. 8D). The protein levels of PGAM1 and PGAM1-suc were downregulated by AS-IV. Moreover, the levels PGAM1 and PGAM1-suc were increased by KAT2A overexpression, compared with the AS-IV + vector group (Fig. 8E and F). Taken together, AS-IV suppressed tumor growth via inhibiting KAT2A-mediated succinylation of PGAM1.

Fig. 8
figure 8

AS-IV suppressed tumor growth though inhibiting KAT2A-mediated succinylation of PGAM1. (A) The represent images of tumors from mice of each group; (B) Tumor weight of each group; (C) Tumor volume was measured weekly; (D) Histological examination of the morphological changes in tumors from mice of each group; (E) IHC assessed PGAM1 protein level in tumors; (F) Western blot was performed to detect the protein levels of PGAM1 and PGAM1-suc in each group. ***P < 0.001 vs. the control group; ###P < 0.01 vs. the AS-IV + LV-NC group. AS-IV, Astragaloside IV; KAT2A, lysine acetyltransferase 2 A; PGAM1, phosphoglycerate mutase 1; IHC, immunohistochemical; succ, succinylation

Full size image

Discussion

With the acceleration of TCM modernization, increasing evidence shows that many TCM components have significant anticancer activity [14]. In the present study, it was found that the cell viability was gradually decreased with an increasing AS-IV concentration (0, 10, and 20 µg/mL) in HCC cells. Based on these results, 20 µg/mL AS-IV concentration was considered optimal and hence selected for further experiments. In addition, AS-IV treatment downregulated the glycolysis in HCC cells, suggesting that AS-IV might play a suppressive role in the HCC progression. Similarly, studies have reported that the proliferation, migration, and invasion of HCC and lung cancer cells following AS-IV treatment were substantially attenuated [6, 13]. However, the effects of AS-IV on glycolysis have not been researched. Nonetheless, Bu-Shen-Jian-Pi-Fang, a long-standing TCM, is involved in multiple targets and signaling pathways related to tumorigenesis and glycolysis metabolism in clear cell renal cell carcinoma [39]. Additionally, shikonin, a natural naphthoquinone compound, was also reported to inhibit rheumatoid arthritis by regulating glycolysis [40].

It has been reported that the alteration of glycolysis was associated with succinylation [41], thus, in this study, we examined the levels of succinylation level in SNU182 and Huh7 cell lines. The results indicated that the succinylation was decreased after AS-IV treatment, implying that the progression of HCC might be related to succinylation. Moreover, overexpression of KAT2A reversed the decreased cell viability and glycolysis caused by AS-IV treatment, indicating that KAT2A-mediated succinylation might be oncogenic. Similarly, high expression of KAT2A promotes the proliferation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells [42]. Additionally, KAT2A has been found to promote hepatitis B virus transcription and replication through succinylation modification [43]. A previous study demonstrated that PGAM1 is a histone acetyltransferase 1 downstream regulatory gene, another succinyltransferase, involved in various tumors progression [44]. Thus, we examined the relationship between KAT2A and PGAM1 in this study, and the results showed that overexpression of KAT2A upregulated the protein levels of PGAM1 and PGAM1-suc. Moreover, KAT2A interacted with PGAM1 in HCC cells, suggesting that PGAM1 was a downstream regulatory target for KAT2A in HCC. Additionally, it was found that silencing of PGAM1 rescued the increased cell viability and glycolysis caused by KAT2A overexpression in AS-IV-treated HCC cell lines, further supporting the above results. KAT2A is often regarded as an acetyltransferase, and the succinylation of KAT2A has been poorly studied. A study demonstrates that KAT2A could act as a histone succinyltransferase from succinyl-CoA directly to histone H3 lysine 79 (H3K79) from a molecular perspective, which is important for the regulation of gene expression in tumor cells [45]. The specific mechanism of KAT2A in succinylation in tumors remains to be further verified. Additionally, our results found that PGAM1 was succinylated at K161 site, which has not been reported before. This could provide a reference for further study to explore the specific mechanism of PGAM1 in HCC or other cancers. In tumor-bearing mice, AS-IV treatment suppressed the tumor growth and the succinylation of PGAM1, while KAT2A overexpression reversed these results. These results suggested that AS-IV suppressed tumor growth though inhibiting KAT2A-mediated succinylation of PGAM1.

There are several limitations in this study. Firstly, we only used SNU-182 and HuH-7 cell lines for analysis, and it is necessary to investigate more HCC cell lines in future studies. The underlying mechanism of AS-IV on HCC may be complex, including but not limited to PGAM1 succinylation. Moreover, it is ideal to detect the effects of KAT2A-overexpression and knockdown in the presence of succinyl-resistant and succinyl-like mutants of K161. In addition, we have to admit that the resolution of the microscopy we used in the IF study is low. We will further address these deficiencies as experimental conditions permit in the future.

As shown in supplemental Fig. S1, our study first found the inhibitory effects of AS-IV on HCC cell viability and glycolysis. Subsequent studies suggested that the above inhibitory effects were achieved by downregulating KAT2A. Further mechanistic studies indicated that KAT2A deficiency inhibited PGAM1 and its succinylation expression, thus suppressing the cell viability and glycolysis. In conclusion, AS-IV inhibited cell viability and glycolysis of HCC by regulating KAT2A-mediated succinylation of PGAM1, which might provide new insights into the treatment of in HCC.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Calderaro J, Seraphin TP, Luedde T, Simon TG. Artificial intelligence for the prevention and clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Heptol. 2022;76(6):1348–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Doebele RC, Pilling AB, Aisner DL, Kutateladze TG, Le AT, Weickhardt AJ, Kondo KL, Linderman DJ, Heasley LE, Franklin WA, et al. Mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib in patients with ALK gene rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(5):1472–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Akinyemiju T, Abera S, Ahmed M, Alam N, Alemayohu MA, Allen C, Al-Raddadi R, Alvis-Guzman N, Amoako Y, Artaman A, et al. The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and underlying etiologies from 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level: results from the global burden of Disease Study 2015. Jama Oncol. 2017;3(12):1683–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. New Engl J Med. 2008;359(4):378–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsiao WL, Liu L. The role of traditional Chinese herbal medicines in cancer therapy–from TCM theory to mechanistic insights. Planta Med. 2010;76(11):1118–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu F, Cui WQ, Wei Y, Cui J, Qiu J, Hu LL, Gong WY, Dong JC, Liu BJ. Astragaloside IV inhibits lung cancer progression and metastasis by modulating macrophage polarization through AMPK signaling. J Exp Clin Canc Res. 2018;37(1):207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zang Y, Wan J, Zhang Z, Huang S, Liu X, Zhang W. An updated role of astragaloside IV in heart failure. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;126:110012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng H, Zhu X, Tang Y, Fu S, Kong B, Liu X. Astragaloside IV ameliorates diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome–mediated inflammation. INT J MOL MED 2021, 48(2).

  9. Yao M, Zhang L, Wang L. Astragaloside IV: a promising natural neuroprotective agent for neurological disorders. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;159:114229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen T, Yang P, Jia Y. Molecular mechanisms of astragaloside–IV in cancer therapy (review). Int J Mol Med 2021, 47(3).

  11. Jiang ZB, Gao J, Chai YH, Li W, Luo YF, Chen YZ. Astragaloside alleviates alcoholic fatty liver disease by suppressing oxidative stress. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2021;37(8):718–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun Y, Ma Y, Sun F, Feng W, Ye H, Tian T, Lei M. Astragaloside IV attenuates lipopolysaccharide induced liver injury by modulating Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress and NLRP3-mediated inflammation. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e15436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Min L, Wang H, Qi H. Astragaloside IV inhibits the progression of liver cancer by modulating macrophage polarization through the TLR4/NF-kappaB/STAT3 signaling pathway. AM J Transl Res. 2022;14(3):1551–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Xia D, Li W, Tang C, Jiang J. Astragaloside IV, as a potential anticancer agent. FRONT PHARMACOL. 2023;14:1065505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dai X, Zhou Y, Han F, Li J. Succinylation and redox status in cancer cells. FRONT ONCOL. 2022;12:1081712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang Y, Gibson GE. Succinylation Links metabolism to protein functions. Nerochem Res. 2019;44(10):2346–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu YP, Wen R, Liu CF, Zhang TN, Yang N. Cellular and molecular biology of sirtuins in cardiovascular disease. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;164:114931.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Newman JC, He W, Verdin E. Mitochondrial protein acylation and intermediary metabolism: regulation by sirtuins and implications for metabolic disease. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(51):42436–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu K, Han D. A review of the mechanism of succinylation in cancer. Medicine. 2022;101(45):e31493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li X, Zhang C, Zhao T, Su Z, Li M, Hu J, Wen J, Shen J, Wang C, Pan J, et al. Lysine-222 succinylation reduces lysosomal degradation of lactate dehydrogenase a and is increased in gastric cancer. J Exp Clin Cance Res. 2020;39(1):172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen XF, Tian MX, Sun RQ, Zhang ML, Zhou LS, Jin L, Chen LL, Zhou WJ, Duan KL, Chen YJ et al. SIRT5 inhibits peroxisomal ACOX1 to prevent oxidative damage and is downregulated in liver cancer. EMBO REP 2018, 19(5).

  22. Wang Y, Guo YR, Liu K, Yin Z, Liu R, Xia Y, Tan L, Yang P, Lee JH, Li XJ, et al. KAT2A coupled with the alpha-KGDH complex acts as a histone H3 succinyltransferase. Nature. 2017;552(7684):273–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Wang T, Xia J, Yao W, Huang F. Enzymatic and nonenzymatic protein acetylations control glycolysis process in liver diseases. Faseb J. 2019;33(11):11640–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo T, Bai YH, Cheng XJ, Han HB, Du H, Hu Y, Jia SQ, Xing XF, Ji JF. Insulin gene enhancer protein 1 mediates glycolysis and tumorigenesis of gastric cancer through regulating glucose transporter 4. Cancer Commun. 2021;41(3):258–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Warmoes MO, Locasale JW. Heterogeneity of glycolysis in cancers and therapeutic opportunities. Biochem Pharmacol. 2014;92(1):12–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vander HM, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324(5930):1029–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bi J, Bi F, Pan X, Yang Q. Establishment of a novel glycolysis-related prognostic gene signature for ovarian cancer and its relationships with immune infiltration of the tumor microenvironment. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ye JH, Chao J, Chang ML, Peng WH, Cheng HY, Liao JW, Pao LH. Pentoxifylline ameliorates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in hyperglycaemic and dyslipidaemic mice by upregulating fatty acid beta-oxidation. Sci Rep-UK. 2016;6:33102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang T, Yao W, Shao Y, Zheng R, Huang F. PCAF fine-tunes hepatic metabolic syndrome, inflammatory disease, and cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(12):5787–800.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pei C, Wang F, Huang D, Shi S, Wang X, Wang Y, Li S, Wu Y, Wang Z. Astragaloside IV protects from PM2.5-Induced Lung Injury by regulating Autophagy via Inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in vivo and in vitro. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:4707–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wen M, Kwon Y, Wang Y, Mao JH, Wei G. Elevated expression of UBE2T exhibits oncogenic properties in human prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(28):25226–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu J, Montgomery BK, Chatain GP, Bugarini A, Zhang Q, Wang X, Edwards NA, Ray-Chaudhury A, Merrill MJ, Lonser RR, et al. Corticotropin releasing hormone can selectively stimulate glucose uptake in corticotropinoma via glucose transporter 1. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018;470:105–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun H, Wang W, Han P, Shao M, Song G, Du H, Yi T, Li S. Astragaloside IV ameliorates renal injury in db/db mice. Sci Rep-UK. 2016;6:32545.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jiang Z, Mao Z. Astragaloside IV (AS-IV) alleviates the malignant biological behavior of hepatocellular carcinoma via Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. RSC Adv. 2019;9(61):35473–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Su CM, Wang HC, Hsu FT, Lu CH, Lai CK, Chung JG, Kuo YC. Astragaloside IV induces apoptosis, G(1)-Phase arrest and inhibits anti-apoptotic signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Vivo. 2020;34(2):631–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ganapathy-Kanniappan S, Geschwind JF. Tumor glycolysis as a target for cancer therapy: progress and prospects. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Li H, Xia Z, Liu L, Pan G, Ding J, Liu J, Kang J, Li J, Jiang D, Liu W. Astragalus IV undermines Multi-drug Resistance and Glycolysis of MDA-MB-231/ADR cell line by depressing hsa_circ_0001982-miR-206/miR-613 Axis. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:5821–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang YF, Zhao LN, Geng Y, Yuan HF, Hou CY, Zhang HH, Yang G, Zhang XD. Aspirin modulates succinylation of PGAM1K99 to restrict the glycolysis through NF-kappaB/HAT1/PGAM1 signaling in liver cancer. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2023;44(1):211–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zheng J, Xu W, Liu W, Tang H, Lu J, Yu K, Song X, Li F, Wang Y, Wang R et al. Traditional Chinese medicine Bu-Shen-Jian-Pi-Fang attenuates glycolysis and immune escape in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results based on network pharmacology. Bioscience Rep 2021, 41(6).

  40. Li J, Pang J, Liu Z, Ge X, Zhen Y, Jiang CC, Liu Y, Huo Q, Sun Y, Liu H. Shikonin induces programmed death of fibroblast synovial cells in rheumatoid arthritis by inhibiting energy pathways. Sci Rep-UK. 2021;11(1):18263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tannahill GM, Curtis AM, Adamik J, Palsson-McDermott EM, McGettrick AF, Goel G, Frezza C, Bernard NJ, Kelly B, Foley NH, et al. Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1beta through HIF-1alpha. Nature. 2013;496(7444):238–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Y, Chen W, Lian J, Zhang H, Yu B, Zhang M, Wei F, Wu J, Jiang J, Jia Y, et al. The lncRNA PVT1 regulates nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation via activating the KAT2A acetyltransferase and stabilizing HIF-1alpha. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(2):695–710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Qin YP, Yu HB, Yuan SY, Yang Z, Ren F, Wang Q, Li F, Ren JH, Cheng ST, Zhou YJ, et al. KAT2A promotes Hepatitis B Virus transcription and replication through epigenetic regulation of cccDNA Minichromosome. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:795388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang G, Yuan Y, Yuan H, Wang J, Yun H, Geng Y, Zhao M, Li L, Weng Y, Liu Z, et al. Histone acetyltransferase 1 is a succinyltransferase for histones and non-histones and promotes tumorigenesis. Embo Rep. 2021;22(2):e50967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang Y, Guo YR, Xing D, Tao YJ, Lu Z. Supramolecular assembly of KAT2A with succinyl-CoA for histone succinylation. Cell Discov. 2018;4:47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200020, China

    Yuanzhang Zhu & Fei Lu

Authors
  1. Yuanzhang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fei Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors participated in the design, interpretation of the studies and analysis of the data and review of the manuscript. Y Z drafted the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content and was responsible for the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data for the work; F L made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments should comply with the ARRIVE guidelines. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Lu, F. Astragaloside IV inhibits cell viability and glycolysis of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating KAT2A-mediated succinylation of PGAM1. BMC Cancer 24, 682 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12438-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12438-9

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us