Skip to main content
  • Study Protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Evaluation of the tolerability and safety of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: a phase I dose escalation study

Abstract

Background

Life expectancy of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is still limited despite several systemic treatments. Within five years after diagnosis of primary prostate cancer, 10–20% of the patients have mCRPC and curation is not an option. Radionuclide therapy (RNT) targeted against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) emerged as a new treatment option and showed effective results in patients with mCRPC. Survival benefit after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RNT has already been demonstrated in several clinical trials. However, [225Ac]Ac-PSMA (225Ac-PSMA) appears to be an even more promising radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of mCRPC. The use of alpha emitting radionuclides offers advantages over beta emitting radionuclides due to the high linear energy transfer effective for killing tumor cells and the limited range to reduce the radiation effects on the healthy tissue. However, these results are based on retrospective data and safety data of 225Ac-PSMA are still limited. Therefore, a prospective trial is needed to determine the optimal amount of activity that can be administered.

Methods

The 225Ac-PSMA-Imaging & Therapy (I&T) trial is an investigator-initiated phase I, single-center, open label, repeated dose-escalation and expansion trial. Patient with PSMA-positive mCRPC after at least one line of chemotherapy and/or one line of nonsteroidal antiandrogen will be treated with 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in increasing amount of activity per cycle. Dose-escalation following an accelerated 3 + 3 design which allows to open the next dose-level cohort in the absence of dose limiting toxicity while the previous one is still ongoing. Up to 4 treatment cohorts will be explored including up to 3 dose-escalation cohorts and one expansion cohort where patients will be administered with the recommended dose. A total of up to 30 patients will be enrolled in this trial. All patients will be evaluated for safety. Additionally, dosimetry was performed for the patients in the dose-escalation cohorts after the first 225Ac-PSMA-I&T administration.

Discussion

This trial will assess the safety and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC to recommend the optimal dose for the phase II trial.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT05902247). Retrospectively registered 13 June 2023.

Background

Worldwide, prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common types of cancer in men and the number five leading cause of death [1]. Within five years after diagnosis of primary PCa, 10–20% of the patients have metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [2]. Systemic treatments of mCRPC consists of androgen receptor (AR) or androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (abiraterone or enzalutamide), chemotherapy (docetaxel or cabazitaxel), Radium-223 (for patients with bone metastases only), immunotherapy (sipuleucel-T or ipilimumab) and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib and rucaparib) [3]. However, life expectancy of patients with mCRPC is still limited with an overall survival ranging from 3.6 to 34.7 months [4, 5].

More recently, radionuclide therapy (RNT) targeted against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been investigated. PSMA is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein with both an intracellular and extracellular domain [6, 7] and is expressed on benign prostate epithelium and on prostate cancer cells. PSMA is also expressed in other tissues such as the kidneys, small intestine and the salivary glands [6]. However, the expression on prostate cancer cells is approximately a thousand-fold higher than the expression on normal tissues [8]. Therefore, PSMA is a target for both imaging and therapy of prostate cancer. Imaging with Gallium-68 (Ga-68) or Fluorine-18 labeled PSMA ligands is already widely used for primary staging of PCa and for the detection of recurrent disease in patient with a biochemical recurrence [9]. In the recent years, different PSMA ligands were developed for therapy such as PSMA-617 and PSMA Imaging and Therapy (I&T) [10].

In 2022, the Food and Drug Administration approved treatment with Lutetium-177 PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) in the USA for patients with PSMA-positive mCRPC who had previous treatment with AR inhibitors and taxane-based chemotherapy [11,12,13]. The results of two randomized trials led to this approval. In the phase II TheraP trial, an improved progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.1 mo was achieved with 177Lu-PSMA-617 as compared to cabazitaxel (hazard ratio (HR) 0.63) [12]. The phase III VISION trial compared the radiographic PFS (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) in two treatment arms [13]. In this randomized trial, 831 patients with progressive PSMA-positive mCRPC were treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 RNT and standard of care (SOC) or with SOC alone. An improved rPFS and OS was achieved in the 177Lu-PSMA group (8.7 and 15.3 months, respectively) compared to the SOC only group (3.4 and 11.3 months, respectively).

Although 177Lu-PSMA-617 improves PFS and OS [12, 13], Actinium-225 (Ac-225) PSMA (225Ac-PSMA) might be an even more promising radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of mCRPC [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Ac-225 is an alpha-emitter with a half-life of 9.9 days and emits four alpha particles upon decay with energies ranging from 5.8 to 8.4 MeV and tissue penetration of 47 to 85 μm [20]. The decay cascade also includes two beta particles and gamma co-emissions, which may be used for imaging [20]. The use of alpha emitting radionuclides has advantages over beta emitting radionuclides, such as Lu-177, since alpha emitting radionuclides have a high linear energy transfer (LET) with a short radiation range [21]. The high LET nature of the alpha particles makes them a potent radiation capable of effectively killing tumor cells by a single or few event(s) through breaks of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) double strands and DNA clusters, and the short range allows selective tumor cell killing while reducing the radiation effects in the surrounding healthy tissue [20]. As a result, alpha emitting radionuclides have a more complex DNA damage with less possibility for repair than beta emitting radionuclides [21]. Previously, small retrospective case series showed efficacy and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA-617 in patients with both heavily pretreated and chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC [15,16,17,18, 22, 23]. Therefore, alpha emitting radionuclides could provide patients with mCRPC a new treatment option to further improve their survival and quality of life.

As there is still a lack of knowledge on the safety and optimal dose of 225Ac-PSMA, prospective phase I trials are needed to determine the optimal dose level. Therefore, a phase I dose-escalation trial was initiated for 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC to assess the safety and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T and to recommend an optimal dose for a phase II trial.

Methods/design

Study design

This is a phase I, single-center, open label, repeated dose-escalation and expansion trial (See Fig. 1) in patients with mCRPC and sufficient PSMA expression (defined as at least one metastatic site with significant increased uptake value as compared to the normal liver uptake) on PET imaging. The dose-escalation will proceed following an accelerated 3 + 3 design which will allow to open the next dose-level cohort in the absence of dose limiting toxicity while the previous cohort is still ongoing. Up to four treatment cohorts will be explored including up to three dose-escalation cohorts (with dose-levels of 8, 10 and 12 MBq, respectively) and a last one (expansion cohort) where patients will be administered with the recommended dose. A total of up to 30 patients will be enrolled in the dose-escalation and expansion cohort. All patients will be evaluated for safety.

Additionally, extensive dosimetry will be performed for the first three patients in cohort 1 after the first administration of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T. The feasibility and results of this dosimetry protocol will be evaluated after the first three patients during the trial. If there is significant benefit (determined by a better trade-off between absorbed doses in tumor lesions and the absorbed doses in the critical organs/side effects) for these patients, also the following patients in the dose-escalation will undergo extensive dosimetry. In the case of limited benefit for patients, the dosimetry protocol will be adjusted.

Study objectives

The primary objective of this phase I trial is to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended a phase 2 dose based on tolerability and safety of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T. The secondary objectives are to calculate the maximum absorbed dose in critical organs (e.g. bone marrow, kidneys, salivary glands) using PET/MRI and whole-body imaging with Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography / Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) post-therapy. In addition, short-term changes in quantitative parameters after 225Ac-PSMA-I&T will be assessed using PET/MRI with 68Ga-PSMA-I&T.

Patient selection

Inclusion criteria

  • Histopathological proven metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Castration-resistant disease is defined as a serum testosterone level of ≤ 50 nanogram per deciliter or ≤ 1.7 nanomol per liter after bilateral orchiectomy or during maintenance treatment consisting of androgen-ablation therapy with a luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone agonist.

  • Evidence of progressive disease, defined as 1 or more Prostate Cancer Work Grouping 3 (PCWG3) criteria: − PSA level ≥ 1 ng/mL that has increased on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 week apart.

  • Progressive disease as defined by RECIST 1.1 according to PCGW3 modifications.

  • Progressive disease after at least one treatment line of chemotherapy and/or one line of nonsteroidal antiandrogen.

  • No active anti-tumor therapy, except for androgen deprivation therapy in combination with at least one androgen receptor-targeted agent.

  • Willing and able to undergo two cycles of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy and three PET/MRI scans within 16 weeks according to the protocol.

  • Signed and dated written informed consent by the patient (or legal representative) prior to any study-specific procedures.

  • Age \( \ge \) 18 years.

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score 0–2.

  • Use of highly effective methods of contraception (female partners of male participants) during the trial and 6 months after completion of the study or willing to practice sexual abstinence.

Exclusion criteria

  • Concurrent severe illness or clinically relevant trauma within 2 weeks before the administration of the investigational product that might preclude study completion or interfere with study results.

  • Serum hemoglobin ≤ 6.2 mmol/L, total white blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 3.5·109/L, absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1.5·109/L, platelet count ≤ 100·109/L, serum creatinine concentration ≥ 150 umol/L (≥ 1.7 mg/dL), serum albumin < 30 g/L, bilirubin ≥ 1.5 x upper limit normal (ULN), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) ≥ 3 x ULN and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) ≥ 3 x ULN (or bilirubin ≥ 3 x ULN, ASAT ≥ 5 x ULN and ALAT ≥ 5 x ULN in the case of pre-existing liver metastases at baseline).

  • Concurrent bladder outflow obstruction or unmanageable urinary incontinence.

  • Known or expected hypersensitivity to Ga-68, Ac-225, PSMA-I&T, or any excipient present in 225Ac/68Ga-PSMA-I&T.

  • Prior administration of a radiopharmaceutical within a period corresponding to eight half-lives of the previously administered radionuclide.

  • Prior treatment with any type of radionuclide therapy.

  • History of somatic or psychiatric disease/condition that may interfere with the objectives and assessments of the study.

  • Central nervous system (CNS) metastases, leptomeningeal disease, or spinal cord compression.

  • External beam radiation therapy within 4 weeks of first dose (or local or focal radiotherapy within 2 weeks of first dose).

  • Male subjects unwilling to abstain from donating sperm during treatment and for an additional 6 months after the last dose.

Statistical calculations for trial sample size

The primary objective of the trial is to assess the safety and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T, to assess dose-limiting toxicities and determine the MTD (if reached) and define the recommended dose for the phase II trial. Since the data for this objective will be descriptive, a formal statistical sample size calculation is not required. The maximum number of patients has been set on 30 patients. This sample size is considered sufficient for answering the research questions of this study.

Overview of current protocol

Definitions of study periods and visits of the phase I study

  • Screening Period, (Day − 28 to D0) to establish protocol eligibility after obtaining informed consent.

  • Imaging Period: at the screening visit, at Day 7 after treatment visit 1 and at Day 42 after treatment visit 2, PET-MRI using 68Ga-PSMA-I&T will be performed to acquire dosimetry data and for response evaluation. Because of the different energy levels of the radiation, the effect of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T on the images of the 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET-MRI is considered minimal and no effect on the signal-to-noise ratio of PET/MRI is expected. When feasible, a whole-body (WB) planar scan will be acquired at Day 7 to image residual 225Ac-PSMA I&T. The WB planar image will be acquired before the 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET-MRI or 4–5 h (h) thereafter to prevent any effects of radiation emission by Gallium-68 on the imaging quality of the WB scan.

  • Treatment Visits: days of administration of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T.

  • Safety Visits: Follow-up period 1: from the end of Imaging period to treatment visit 2, over 8 ± 1 weeks; Follow-up period 2: from the end of treatment visit 2 to the end of study visit (16 ± 1 weeks).

  • Follow-up Visits, will be performed four times after each cycle and 24 weeks after the first cycle.

  • End of Study Visit, which will scheduled at 24 weeks after the first administration of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T.

Venous blood samples will be collected before and after 225Ac-PSMA-I&T administration, at Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 and Day 42 after each cycle. Urine will be collected at the same time points.

Study procedures of the dosimetry protocol after the first administration of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T

  • Blood sampling will be performed at t = 0 (end of infusion), 5, 10, 20, 30 and 60 min, 2, 4 and 8 h and at each imaging time point (24, 48, 72–96 and 168 h).

  • Urine samples will be collected over the first 24 h in time intervals: 0–2 h, 2–4 h, 4–8 h and 8–24 h.

  • Planar WB scans will be performed at 4, 24, 48, 72–96 and 144–168 h post therapy.

  • SPECT/CT scans of the head / thorax (salivary and lacrimal glands in field of view) and the abdomen will be made at 4 and 24 h. Acquisition and reconstruction parameters will be used as published by Benabdallah et al. [24].

Study endpoints and analyses

Primary endpoints

The primary endpoints of this study are: 1) safety and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC as assessed by, (a) incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse event (SAEs), (b) absolute values and changes from baseline in laboratory parameters (hematology, blood chemistry and urinalysis), including assessment of shifts from baseline to abnormal values on treatment and (c) Absolute values and changes from baseline in vital signs & electrocardiography (ECG) parameters, and 2) a recommended dose for further phase II study.

Analysis of the primary endpoints

The evaluation of the safety of 225Ac-PSMA I&T will be based on the analysis of the incidence, severity, type and consequences of each AE/SAE. Also, all clinically significant value changes of the vital signs, laboratory values and ECG parameters will be reported. AEs and SAEs will be presented on a per patient basis and will be subdivided per organ classes. Descriptive tabulation will be presented for all AEs and SAEs on the incidence, type, severity and possible relation to the investigational product.

Categorical data will be presented as absolute and relative frequencies. Continuous data will be presented as means (and standard deviations) or medians (and interquartile ranges). The observed baseline values and changes over time of vital signs, ECG parameters and laboratory values will be presented graphically using boxplots.

Secondary endpoints

The secondary endpoints include the following:

  • the volume calculations of critical organs and tumor using 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET-MRI.

  • the expected radiotracer uptake in critical organs and tumor calculated as a percentage of the injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g).

  • the expected absorbed doses by 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in critical organs and tumor.

  • the changes in maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of the target lesions on 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET-MRI.

  • the morphological changes on MRI by measuring the changes in MRI signals.

  • the objective response rate (ORR) as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria v.1.1.

  • the percent changes from baseline in tumor size where tumor size is defined as the sum of all target lesions as measured by RECIST criteria v.1.1.

  • the PSA response rate assessed from treatment visit 1 defined as a decrease in PSA of ≥ 50% from baseline.

  • the percent change from baseline in PSA as a continuous endpoint by visit and maximum reduction during the study.

  • the OS defined as the time from the date of first dose of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T treatment to the date of death due to any cause.

  • the percent change from baseline values of pain questionnaire (Brief Pain Inventory short version, Dutch language) at every treatment visit.

Analysis of secondary endpoints

Preliminary efficacy analyses will be performed for all patients in the study. Objective response rate using the RECIST 1.1 will be measured for patients with visceral disease at baseline and will be presented with its 95% confidence intervals. The numbers of patients with either complete response, partial response, stable disease or progressive disease according to RECIST 1.1 will be summarized descriptively.

Changes in tumor size at the end of the study from treatment visit 1 will be summarized descriptively for patients with measurable disease by RECIST at baseline for patients. This data will also be displayed graphically in waterfall plots which present vertical bars representing each patient’s % change from baseline in tumor size ordered from largest increase to largest decrease, including reference lines at + 20% and − 30% (indicators of target lesion progression and response per RECIST guidelines).

PSA response rate with 95% confidence intervals will be presented by dose group. Changes in PSA will also be summarized descriptively.

An exploratory analysis will be performed to explore any preliminary efficacy of 225Ac-PSMA I&T as detected from 68Ga-PSMA I&T imaging. Summaries of number and location of lesions as detected by 68Ga-PSMA I&T imaging and SUV values will be produced at screening and at the end of the study to assess change in the number of lesions with uptake of68Ga-PSMA I&T and the change in SUV values. Any subject not known to have died at the time of the analysis will be censored based on the last recorded date on which the subject was known to be alive.

Monitoring

Monitoring is performed according to good clinical practice guidelines by the Clinical Trial Center of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Trial status

The trial is open for inclusion since March 2022 and is estimated for completion in December 2024. The approved protocol is version 5, 5 December 2022. This trial is retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 13 June 2023 (NCT05902247).

Discussion

Although 225Ac-PSMA therapy showed promising results, current clinical data are only based on retrospective studies in relatively small groups of patients with mCRPC [19]. For the assessment of the safety and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA therapy, more prospective data are needed. In this investigator-initiated phase I trial, we aim to assess the safety and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA I&T in patients with mCRPC and to recommend the optimal dose for a phase II trial.

For imaging in the current trial, a hybrid Positron Emission Tomography / Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI) scanner is used. As metastases in patients with mCRPC are most commonly detected in the bones, lymph nodes and liver, the PET/MRI is considered more sensitive to detect metastases due to better visualization of soft tissues and better characterization of the liver and bone lesions [25,26,27] (See Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Dose-escalation design of the 225Ac-PSMA I&T phase I trial. DL = Dose Level. MBq = Megabecquerel

PSMA is not as prostate specific as the name would suggest since many other tissues such as the kidneys, small intestine and the salivary glands have PSMA expression [6]. To predict toxicity on these healthy tissues, it is essential to calculate the absorbed dose prospectively and compare these data with previous published data. Since Ac-225 is an alpha emitting radionuclide, dosimetry assessments direct after therapy are challenging. Nevertheless, it is still necessary to calculate the absorbed doses to determine to what extent the tumors and healthy critical organs (e.g. bone marrow, kidneys, salivary glands) are affected by the radiation. Therefore, we designed an extensive dosimetry protocol, but this protocol was adapted after evaluation of the first three patients due to the limited benefit and high burden for patients. In the reduced dosimetry protocol, blood sampling remained unchanged and urine sampling was discontinued. WB planar imaging was reduced from five time-points to three time-points at 1 h, 24 h and 4–10 days. SPECT/CT imaging of the head and abdomen was reduced from two time-points to one time-point at 24 h (See Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Study protocol and dosimetry protocol (dosimetry will be performed for the first three patients in cohort 1 after the first administration of 225Ac-PSMA I&T). 225Ac = Actinium-225. d = Day. 68Ga = Gallium-68. h = Hour. I&T = Imaging & Therapy. Min = minute. MBq = Megabecquerel. PET/MRI = Positron Emission Tomography / Magnetic Resonance Imaging. PSMA = Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen. SPECT/CT = Single Proton Emission Computed Tomography / Computed Tomography. Wb = Whole-body. Adapted from 123RF by captainvector.

The current study is the first phase I trial for 225Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy under full Good Manufacturing Practice compliance. Since the same PSMA ligand is used for both imaging and therapy, it is expected that 68Ga-PSMA-I&T and 225Ac-PSMA-I&T have the same uptake pattern in healthy tissue and tumors. As a result, the biodistribution of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy can be predicted very precisely. In most studies on 225Ac-PSMA, patients with mCRPC were treated with 225Ac-PSMA-617 [15,16,17, 22, 23], while only one clinical study investigated 225Ac-PSMA I&T [18]. Preclinical and clinical data have showed that both PSMA ligands, when labeled with 177Lu or 225Ac, have a comparable in vivo behavior, toxicity profile and efficacy in patients with mCRPC [28,29,30,31]. For therapy with PSMA-617, however, a different diagnostic ligand (PSMA-11) is usually used for imaging since PSMA-617 is not suitable for diagnostic purposes. In clinical practice, this is not a problem because of the excellent representation of PSMA expression with both PSMA-I&T and PSMA-11 [32].

In conclusion, to assess the safety and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC and to recommend the optimal dose for a phase II trial, the design of the current phase I trial includes imaging using PET/MRI, an extensive dosimetry protocol, and use of the same PSMA-I&T ligand for imaging and therapy.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

%ID/g:

Percentage of the Injected Dose per Gram of tissue

225Ac:

Actinium-225

AE:

Adverse Event

ALAT:

Alanine Aminotransferase

AR:

Androgeen Receptor

ASAT:

Aspartate Aminotransferase

CNS:

Central Nervous System

CT:

Computed Tomography

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic Acid

ECG:

Electrocardiography

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

68Ga:

Gallium-68

h:

Hour

HR:

Hazard ratio

I&T:

Imaging & Therapy

LET:

Linear Energy Transfer

177Lu:

Lutetium-177

mCRPC:

metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

MeV:

Megaelectronvolt

µm:

micrometer

mmol:

Millimol

mo:

Month

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MTD:

Maximum Tolerated Dose

OS:

Overall Survival

PARP:

Poly ADP-ribose Polymerase

PCa:

Prostate Cancer

PCWG3:

Prostate Cancer Work Grouping 3

PET:

Positron Emission Tomography

PFS:

Progression-free Survival

PSMA:

Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen

RECIST:

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

RNT:

Radionuclide Therapy

rPFS:

radiographic Progression-free Survival

SAE:

Serious Adverse Event

SOC:

Standard of Care

SUVmax:

maximum Standardized Uptake Value

ULN:

Upper Limit Normal

WB:

Whole-body

WBC:

White Blood Cell

References

  1. Rawla P. Epidemiology of prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019;10(2):63–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Labriola MK, Atiq S, Hirshman N, Bitting RL. Management of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following potent androgen receptor inhibition: a review of novel investigational therapies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021;24(2):301–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Powers E, Karachaliou GS, Kao C, Harrison MR, Hoimes CJ, George DJ, et al. Novel therapies are changing treatment paradigms in metastatic prostate cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lawal IO, Bruchertseifer F, Vorster M, Morgenstern A, Sathekge MM. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted endoradiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(1):98–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitsogiannis I, Tzelves L, Dellis A, Issa H, Papatsoris A, Moussa M. Prostate cancer immunotherapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022;22(5):577–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, Heston WD, Cordon-Cardo C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3(1):81–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sweat SD, Pacelli A, Murphy GP, Bostwick DG. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. Urology. 1998;52(4):637–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghosh A, Heston WD. Tumor target prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and its regulation in prostate cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91(3):528–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Han S, Woo S, Kim YJ, Suh CH. Impact of < ovid:sup > 68 Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):179–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Afshar-Oromieh A, Babich JW, Kratochwil C, Giesel FL, Eisenhut M, Kopka K, et al. The rise of PSMA ligands for diagnosis and therapy of prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(Suppl 3):79S–89S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Keam SJ. Lutetium Lu 177 Vipivotide Tetraxetan: first approval. Mol Diagn Ther. 2022;26(4):467–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Joshua AM, Goh JC, et al. [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10276):797–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, Fizazi K, Herrmann K, Rahbar K, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chatalic KL, Heskamp S, Konijnenberg M, Molkenboer-Kuenen JD, Franssen GM, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, et al. Towards Personalized treatment of prostate Cancer: PSMA I&T, a promising prostate-specific membrane Antigen-targeted Theranostic Agent. Theranostics. 2016;6(6):849–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Giesel FL, Weis M, Verburg FA, Mottaghy F, et al. 225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA-Targeted alpha-Radiation Therapy of Metastatic Castration-resistant prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(12):1941–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Rathke H, Bronzel M, Apostolidis C, Weichert W, et al. Targeted alpha-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate Cancer with (225)Ac-PSMA-617: Dosimetry Estimate and Empiric Dose Finding. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(10):1624–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Rathke H, Hohenfellner M, Giesel FL, Haberkorn U, et al. Targeted alpha-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate Cancer with (225)Ac-PSMA-617: swimmer-plot analysis suggests Efficacy regarding duration of Tumor Control. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(5):795–802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zacherl MJ, Gildehaus FJ, Mittlmeier L, Boening G, Gosewisch A, Wenter V et al. First clinical results for PSMA targeted alpha therapy using (225)Ac-PSMA-I&T in advanced mCRPC patients. J Nucl Med. 2020.

  19. Ling SW, de Blois E, Hooijman E, van der Veldt A, Brabander T. Advances in (177)Lu-PSMA and (225)Ac-PSMA Radionuclide Therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate Cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(10).

  20. Morgenstern A, Apostolidis C, Kratochwil C, Sathekge M, Krolicki L, Bruchertseifer F. An overview of targeted alpha therapy with (225)actinium and (213)Bismuth. Curr Radiopharm. 2018;11(3):200–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Scheinberg DA, McDevitt MR. Actinium-225 in targeted alpha-particle therapeutic applications. Curr Radiopharm. 2011;4(4):306–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sathekge M, Bruchertseifer F, Knoesen O, Reyneke F, Lawal I, Lengana T, et al. (225)Ac-PSMA-617 in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced prostate cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(1):129–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sathekge M, Bruchertseifer F, Vorster M, Lawal IO, Knoesen O, Mahapane J, et al. Predictors of overall and Disease-Free Survival in Metastatic Castration-resistant prostate Cancer patients receiving (225)Ac-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):62–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Benabdallah N, Scheve W, Dunn N, Silvestros D, Schelker P, Abou D, et al. Practical considerations for quantitative clinical SPECT/CT imaging of alpha particle emitting radioisotopes. Theranostics. 2021;11(20):9721–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Quick HH, von Gall C, Zeilinger M, Wiesmuller M, Braun H, Ziegler S, et al. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(5):280–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ling SW, de Jong AC, Schoots IG, Nasserinejad K, Busstra MB, van der Veldt AAM, et al. Comparison of (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed tomography for primary staging of prostate Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021;33:61–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Riola-Parada C, Garcia-Canamaque L, Perez-Duenas V, Garcerant-Tafur M, Carreras-Delgado JL. Simultaneous PET/MRI vs PET/CT in oncology. A systematic review PET/RM simultanea vs. PET/TC en oncologia. Una revision sistematica. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2016;35(5):306–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schuchardt C, Zhang J, Kulkarni HR, Chen X, Muller D, Baum RP. Prostate-specific membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy using (177)Lu-PSMA I&T and (177)Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate Cancer: comparison of Safety, Biodistribution, and Dosimetry. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(8):1199–207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Prive BM, Derks YHW, Rosar F, Franssen GM, Peters SMB, Khreish F, et al. (89)Zr-labeled PSMA ligands for pharmacokinetic PET imaging and dosimetry of PSMA-617 and PSMA-I&T: a preclinical evaluation and first in man. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(6):2064–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hartrampf PE, Weinzierl FX, Buck AK, Rowe SP, Higuchi T, Seitz AK, et al. Matched-pair analysis of [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T and [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(9):3269–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Roviello G, Catalano M, Ottanelli C, Giorgione R, Rossi V, Gambale E, et al. Castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases: toward the best therapeutic choice. Med Oncol. 2022;39(10):145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guhne F, Radke S, Winkens T, Kuhnel C, Greiser J, Seifert P et al. Differences in distribution and detection rate of the [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA ligands PSMA-617, -I&T and– 11-Inter-Individual comparison in patients with biochemical relapse of prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;15(1).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The 225Ac-PSMA-I&T trial is funded by the non-profit Dutch Cancer Foundation (Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds (KWF) Kankerbestrijding).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SL contributed to the conception and design of the work, the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and have drafted the work. AV contributed to the conception and design of the work, the analysis and interpretation of data and have substantively revised the work. MK contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. MS contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. EH contributed to conception of the work. EB contributed to conception of the work. FB contributed to the design of the work and the interpretation of data. AM contributed to the design of the work and the interpretation of data. TB contributed to the conception and design of the work, the analysis and interpretation of data and have substantively revised the work. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sui wai Ling.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The 225Ac-PSMA-I&T trial was approved by the medical ethical committee of the Erasmus Medical Center (MEC-2020-0632) on 29 December 2021.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ling, S.w., van der Veldt, A.A., Konijnenberg, M. et al. Evaluation of the tolerability and safety of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: a phase I dose escalation study. BMC Cancer 24, 146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-11900-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-11900-y

Keywords