Skip to main content
Download PDF

The combination of PD-L1 expression and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor of postoperative recurrence in non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer volume 23, Article number: 1107 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

While PD-L1 expression and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are prognostic biomarkers for lung cancer, few studies have considered their interaction. We hypothesized that the product of PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score) and the NLR (PD-L1 × NLR) might be a postoperative prognostic marker reflecting the immune microenvironment of lung cancer.

Methods

We analyzed the association between PD-L1 × NLR and postoperative recurrence-free survival in 647 patients with NSCLC using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

In the analysis of PD-L1 × NLR as a categorical variable, the group with PD-L1 × NLR ≥ 25.8 had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) than the group with < 25.8 (adjusted HR 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23–2.60). The adjusted HR for PD-L1 × NLR, considered a continuous variable, was 1.004 (95% CI, 1.002–1.006). The risk of postoperative recurrence increased by 1.004-fold for each unit increase in PD-L1 × NLR, and a more than 2-fold increase in risk was observed for values ≥ 170.

Conclusions

PD-L1 × NLR may be used in real-world clinical practice as a novel factor for predicting the risk of postoperative recurrence after lung cancer surgery.

Peer Review reports

Background

Primary lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Although complete surgical resection is recommended as a cure, a high rate of postoperative recurrence in advanced-stage lung cancer has also been reported [2]. Since the development of immunotherapy in recent years, the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have attracted considerable attention [3]. In the surgical field, studies have shown that the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in preoperative and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a favorable prognosis [4, 5]. Therefore, immunotherapy may play a central role in the treatment of NSCLC.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is widely recognized as a biomarker for predicting the efficacy of PD-1 axis therapies [6]. PD-L1, which is expressed on a variety of malignant tumor cells, including NSCLC cells, is a ligand for programmed death 1 (PD-1), a molecule expressed on immune cells that negatively regulates the immune system [7]. PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells binds to PD-1 on immune cells and suppresses their activation. It is considered that expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells is considered to be associated with a poor prognosis, as such lesions tend to show malignant tumor growth via immunosuppression. Several studies have demonstrated that the expression of PD-L1 is a negative prognostic factor following lung cancer surgery [8,9,10,11], which corroborates this theory. This finding was further supported by our previous findings [12]. However, since there are lung cancer patients with high PD-L1 expression who have a good postoperative course in clinical practice [13], while other lung cancer patients with low PD-L1 expression may show a poor postoperative course in clinical practice [14], factors related to tumor immunity other than PD-L1 may also have a significant impact on postoperative prognosis.

Accumulating evidence indicates that a systemic inflammatory response is associated with poor prognosis in a variety of solid tumors, including NSCLC [15]. Neutrophils are attracted to the tumor stroma by chemokines, which are inflammation-related factors secreted by tumor cells. These attracted neutrophils are involved in the establishment of an inflammatory tumor microenvironment. Neutrophils are indirectly associated with angiogenesis, metastasis and inhibition of apoptosis through inflammatory responses in the tumor microenvironment, which consequently promote tumor growth [16]. Conversely, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes exert anti-tumor effects and inhibit tumor growth [17]. Therefore, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), which can be easily calculated by dividing the number of neutrophils by the number of lymphocytes, has attracted attention as a biomarker of tumor-related immune responses [18, 19]. Some studies have reported that NLR may be a predictive factor for lung cancer recurrence after surgery [20,21,22].

Both the expression of PD-L1 as a marker of tumor immunosuppression and NLR as a marker of the tumor immune response may be predictors of the risk of postoperative recurrence. In previous studies, the association between the expression, PD-L1 and the NLR with lung cancer prognosis was evaluated separately [13, 23,24,25,26]. However, no study has numerically addressed the interaction between PD-L1 expression and the NLR or evaluated the association between this interaction and the postoperative prognosis in NSCLC.

We hypothesized that the value of the product of the tumor proportion score (TPS), which represents the expression of PD-L1, and the preoperative NLR (subsequently “PD-L1 × NLR”) may be a new factor that better reflects the immune microenvironment of lung cancer, while more accurately predicting postoperative recurrence than either of these values alone. The association between this number and the postoperative prognosis of lung cancer was statistically evaluated. The value of PD-L1 × NLR, considering the immune microenvironment of lung cancer, may provide more accurate information for predicting postoperative recurrence in real-world clinical practice than either of these values alone.

Methods

Patients

A total of 647 patients with NSCLC who underwent complete surgical resection at Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center between January 2017 and April 2022 were included in our study. Complete resection was defined as a gross or microscopically removed tumor that corresponded to R0 in the residual tumor (R) classification. Patients with incomplete tumor removal (R1 resection) were excluded from the study. Our institutional pathologists performed histopathological diagnoses according to the 2015 World Health Organization classification. Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to eligible patients who provided informed consent based on the guidelines of the Japanese Lung Cancer Association.

Clinicopathological features, including age, sex, smoking status, comorbidities, histological type, pathological tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification (American Joint Committee eight edition), tumor size (invasive size), surgical procedure, adjuvant chemotherapy, and preoperative laboratory data (i.e., neutrophil counts and lymphocyte counts) were collected from the medical records.

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center (KCMC) (approval number: 2022–043). The Institutional Review Board of KCMC waived the requirement for informed consent from opting out of the research, which was provided on the homepage of KCMC. All methods were in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Tumor PD-L1 immunohistochemistry

All viable cancer cells were assessed in the entire pathological tissue section of each tissue sample. We evaluated PD-L1 expression using the PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit and the Dako Automated Link 48 platform (Agilent Technologies, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and calculated the PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) as the percentage of complete or partial membrane staining in a sample that included at least 100 viable tumor cells, ranging from 0 to 100%. The TPS calculation was performed following the standard 22C3 assay protocol. The tumor region was visually segmented into four areas, and the proportion of PD-L1-positive cells in each area was quantified, yielding an average value for the clinical TPS.

Recurrence-free survival (RFS)

The primary outcome of this study was RFS, defined as the time from the date of curative surgical resection to the date of lung cancer recurrence diagnosis. The patients underwent blood examinations, chest radiography and chest computed tomography every three–six months. Further diagnostic procedures, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head, contrast computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and examination of tissue biopsy specimens, were performed when abnormal findings indicating possible disease recurrence were observed. The diagnosis of recurrence was based on a thorough clinical evaluation of these test results and was determined at a joint conference consisting of general thoracic surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, and pathologists.

Statistical analyses

We used the Mann–Whitney U test to compare two unpaired groups with non-normal continuous variables. Pearson’s chi-squared test, which was used if the overall number of cases was ≥ 40, was used to compare categorical variables between non-recurrence and recurrence groups. Considering the product of PD-L1 expression (i.e., TPS) and the NLR, we were careful to treat TPS 0%. The value of PD-L1 × NLR will always be zero at 0% TPS and will not reflect the NLR at all. Therefore, TPS 0% was replaced by 0.5%, an intermediate value between 0%, and a detection limit of 1%. The predictive performance of the cutoff values of PD-L1 × NLR, PD-L1, and the NLR was calculated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The probability of RFS was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test.

We performed multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) with adjustment for confounding factors. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis can analyze the covariates of the number of cases with an outcome divided by 10 [27]. In the present study, the number of cases was 141 (number of cases with postoperative recurrence) divided by 10 (result:14). We included the value of PD-L1 × NLR as the explanatory variable of interest and the other 13 variables as confounding factors in the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Age, sex, histological type, pathological stage, tumor size, pathological N status, surgical procedure, and adjuvant chemotherapy were selected as confounding factors that have been reported to be potentially associated with postoperative recurrence of NSCLC [28,29,30]. In summary, we selected the following 14 factors as variables in a multivariable Cox hazards model: PD-L1 × NLR (≥ 25.8 [reference: < 25.8]), age (continuous variable), sex (female [reference: man]), histological type (squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and other types [reference: adenocarcinoma (AD)]), pathological stage (stage II and III [reference: stage I]), tumor size (continuous variable), pathological N status (N1 and N2 [reference: N0]), surgical procedure (segmentectomy, lobectomy, and others [i.e., lobectomy with combined resection and pneumonectomy] [reference: wedge resection]), and adjuvant chemotherapy (platinum-based regimen [reference: none]).

We also evaluated the PD-L1 × NLR as a continuous variable rather than a categorical variable. In this case, the PD-L1 × NLR value as a categorical variable was replaced by a continuous variable. The proportional hazards assumption in the Cox models was qualitatively determined from Martingale residual plots. The presence or absence of multicollinearity in the variables of the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was evaluated using a variance inflation factor (VIF) < 2.

All statistical analyses were conducted using Easy R (EZR) (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). EZR is a modified version of R commander with added biostatistical functions [31]. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

The clinicopathological characteristics of the 647 patients with completely resected NSCLC are summarized in Table 1. The median age of the patients was 71 years (range, 65–76 years). Men (58.8%) and smokers (64.4%) were significantly more common in the recurrence group than in the nonrecurrence group. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological type (73.9%); however, there was a trend toward significantly more histological types other than adenocarcinoma in the recurrence group than in the non-recurrence group. Pathological stages I, II, and III were observed in 52 (36.9%), 40 (28.4%), and 49 (34.8%) patients in the recurrence group, and 404 (79.8%), 72 (14.2%), and 30 (5.9%) patients in the non-recurrence group, respectively. Patients in the recurrence group had a significantly higher number of advanced stages than those in the non-recurrence group. In the recurrence group with more advanced stages, extended resection (20 [14.2%]) was significantly more common than that in the non-recurrence group (16 [3.2%]). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 65 (12.8%) and 37 (26.2%) patients in the non-recurrence and recurrence groups, respectively. Neutrophil counts (× 109/L) were 3.0 (range, 2.4–3.9) and 3.5 (range, 2.8–4.4), and lymphocyte counts (× 109/L) were 1.7 (range, 1.4–2.1) and 1.8 (range, 1.3–2.1) in the non-recurrence and recurrence groups, respectively. The expression of PD-L1, NLR, and PD-L1 × NLR were 2% (range, 0%–20%), 1.8 (range, 1.3–2.4) and 3.4 (range, 0.9–38.1) in the non-recurrence group and 15% (range, 1%–60%), 2.1 (range, 1.6–2.8) and 39.1 (range, 3.0–128.2) in the recurrence group, respectively.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients
Full size table

The RFS

During a median follow-up period of 729 days (360–1150 days) after surgery, 141 patients developed recurrent disease (21.7%). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis showed 25.8 a cutoff value of PD-L1 × NLR according to the RFS of patients with NSCLC (Supplemental Fig. S1a). In addition, ROC analyses showed 15.0 and 1.72 as the cutoff values of PD-L1 and the NLR, respectively, according to the RFS of patients with NSCLC (Supplemental Fig. S1b, c). The Kaplan–Meier curves for the RFS according to PD-L1 × NLR are shown in Fig. 1. The RFS in patients with a PD-L1 × NLR ≥ 25.8 was significantly shorter than in those with a value < 25.8 before adjusting for the patient background (log-rank P < 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier curves for the RFS according to the values of PD-L1 and the NLR are shown in Supplemental Fig. S2. The RFS in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 15.0 and NLR ≥ 1.72 were significantly shorter than in those with values < 15.0 and < 1.72, respectively, before adjusting for the patient background (log-rank P < 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curves showing the probability of recurrence-free survival among patients after surgery according to the value of PD-L1 × NLR. NLR neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, PD-L1 programmed cell death-ligand 1

Full size image

Multivariable analyses of postoperative RFS according to the PD-L1 × NLR

The results of the multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses for postoperative RFS according to PD-L1 × NLR as a categorical variable (cutoff value:25.8) are shown in Table 2. A significant difference in RFS was observed between the ≥ 25.8 group and < 25.8 group (adjusted HR, 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26–2.68) after adjusting for patient background factors. The proportional hazards assumption for this Cox model was assessed using a martingale residuals plot (Supplemental Fig. S3). The smoothed curve was generally horizontal, confirming that the proportional hazards assumption was satisfied. There was no multicollinearity in any of the explanatory variables used in the Cox model (VIF < 2) (Supplemental Table S1). Cox proportional hazards analysis, in which PD-L1 × NLR was considered a continuous variable rather than a categorical variable, showed that PD-L1 × NLR was significantly associated with postoperative RFS, with or without adjusting for patient background factors (unadjusted HR, 1.006; 95% CI, 1.004–1.007; adjusted HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.002–1.006) (Table 3). The proportional hazards assumption regarding this Cox model was also confirmed to be satisfied by the martingale residual plot (Supplemental Fig. S4). There was no multicollinearity in any of the variables in the Cox model (VIF < 2) (Supplemental Table S2). Based on the adjusted HR, the results of plotting the HR against each PD-L1 × NLR in the range of 0–500 are shown in Fig. 2. With the value of PD-L1 × NLR in the range of 0–100, the HRs ranged from 1–1.5. At ranges of 100–170, 170–340 and 340–500, the HRs ranged from 1.5–2.0, 2.0–4.0 and 4.0–7.5, respectively.

Table 2 Results of a Cox proportional hazard analysis of RFS according to the product of PD-L1 and the NLR as a categorical variable
Full size table
Table 3 Results of a Cox proportional hazard analysis of RFS according to the product of PD-L1 and the NLR as a continuous variable
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Hazard ratios of postoperative recurrence-free survival for each increase in the value of PD-L1 × NLR. The hazard ratio (y) for each value of PD-L1 × NLR to the range of increase from the value (x) was calculated based on the result of a multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. The hazard ratio for the regression coefficient (β) in this multivariable analysis was given by the value of eβ, i.e., 1.004. The function y was given by y = eβx

Full size image

Multivariable analyses of the postoperative RFS according to the PD-L1 and the NLR

As a control for the results of the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses of the postoperative RFS according to PD-L1 × NLR, we performed multivariable analyses of PD-L1 and the NLR alone. As PD-L1 × NLR, PD-L1, and the NLR differ greatly in the range of possible values, categorical variables rather than continuous variables were used for the comparison. The results of multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses for the postoperative RFS according to PD-L1 and the NLR as a categorical variables (cutoff value: 15.0 and 1.72, respectively) are shown in Supplemental Tables 3 and 4. A significant difference in the RFS was observed between patients with PD-L1 values of ≥ 15.0 and < 15.0 (adjusted HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.15–2.43) and between those with an NLR of ≥ 1.72 and < 1.72 (adjusted HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.09–2.32).

Discussion

In this study, we hypothesized that the product of the expression of PD-L1 (TPS [%]) in lung cancer and preoperative NLR (i.e., PD-L1 × NLR) is a novel prognostic factor that reflects the immune microenvironment in lung cancer. The association between the PD-L1 × NLR value and postoperative recurrence of NSCLC was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The recurrence rate in our cohort was 21.7%, which is in close agreement with previous large cohorts reporting recurrence rates of 20–26% for lung cancer [32,33,34]. When PD-L1 × NLR was treated as a categorical variable, the cut-off value was 25.8. The group with PD-L1 × NLR ≥ 25.8 was associated with a significantly higher risk of postoperative recurrence than the group with PD-L1 × NLR < 25.8. When PD-L1 × NLR was treated as a continuous variable, the risk of postoperative recurrence was 1.004 times higher per unit of change. Based on this result, a mathematical model was developed to represent the risk of postoperative recurrence for each value of PD-L1 × NLR, and the results showed for the first time that the higher the value of PD-L1 × NLR, the greater the stepwise risk.

To assess the accuracy of the PD-L1 × NLR value as a risk factor for postoperative recurrence in direct comparison to individual single values, we conducted a comparison of Kaplan–Meier curves and HRs. The PD-L1, NLR, and PD-L1 × NLR variables differ greatly in the range of values that they can take. Therefore, we considered it unsuitable to use continuous variables for the comparison. To compare these three variables under identical conditions, we employed a binary variable, i.e. a categorical variable in this validation. Significant group differences were found for all variables in the Kaplan–Meier curves. Qualitatively, the difference between the PD-L1 × NLR and PD-L1 groups was greater than that in the NLR group. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, the HRs for postoperative recurrence for the PD-L1 × NLR, PD-L1, and the NLR groups were 1.84 (95% CI, 1.26–2.68), 1.67 (95% CI, 1.15–2.43), and 1.59 (95% CI, 1.09–2.32), respectively. Quantitatively, the HR of the PD-L1 × NLR group was significantly the highest. These comparisons suggest that PD-L1 × NLR may offer greater utility as a biomarker for predicting the risk of postoperative recurrence than PD-L1 or the NLR individually.

The novelty of this study lies in the fact that both PD-L1 expression and the NLR were used as continuous variables and the clarification that their product value could predict postoperative prognosis in NSCLC. Previous studies on lung cancer prognosis have considered a combination of PD-L1 expression and the NLR [35,36,37]. However, PD-L1 expression and the NLR were treated as categorical variables and were evaluated in combination with each category in these reports. Therefore, the cut-off values differed among the studies, and the lack of uniformity in the combinations was considered problematic. We first performed a multivariable analysis to understand the association between the PD-L1 × NLR value and postoperative recurrence by setting cut-off values using ROC curves. The results showed that the group with PD-L1 × NLR ≥ 25.8 was at a higher risk than the group with PD-L1 × NLR < 25.8. However, this cut-off value was limited to the present study. Therefore, we evaluated the PD-L1 × NLR value using a continuous variable that was considered more reproducible. As a result, we have shown for the first time that higher PD-L1 × NLR values tend to increase the risk of postoperative recurrence. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that PD-L1 × NLR is significantly associated with the risk of postoperative recurrence of NSCLC. This is a major new finding of this study, as it clearly demonstrates that a low NLR may reduce the risk, even with a high expression of PD-L1, whereas a high NLR may increase the risk even with a low expression of PD-L1.

There may be a biological explanation for the results of the present study. PD-L1 expression in tumors contributes to tumor promotion by suppressing the activity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Neutrophils have been reported to be associated with tumor promotion through their ability to assist tumor growth, angiogenesis and distant metastasis [38,39,40]. Furthermore, inflammation, reflected by an elevated NLR, also contributes to tumor promotion by stimulating the release of soluble signals associated with tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis [41]. Many tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are thought to be cytotoxic T cells that play a central role in the antitumor immune response. It has been suggested that an increase in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, reflected by a decrease in the NLR, is associated with a favorable prognosis [42] and favorable effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors [43]. In addition, a decrease in the NLR may also reflect a decrease in inflammation. Inflammation is known to be associated with damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and it has been reported that DAMPs released by cancer cells induce myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which strongly suppress antitumor immune responses [44]. Thus, these findings suggested that high expression of PD-L1 and high NLR represent tumor-promoting properties, while low expression of PD-L1 and low NLR may conversely represent tumor-resistant properties. A low NLR may mitigate the tumor-promoting nature of the high expression of PD-L1 due to decreased inflammation and increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conversely, a high NLR may counterbalance the weak tumor-promoting properties associated with low PD-L1 expression by increasing inflammation and decreasing the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In our study, lymphocyte counts did not differ markedly between the nonrecurrence and recurrence groups. However, the NLR showed a significant difference between the non-recurrence and recurrence groups, indicating that the difference was highly dependent on the number of neutrophils. Changes in the NLR may better reflect the effects of inflammation than the properties of lymphocytes. It may be clinically relevant to consider the interaction between PD-L1 and the NLR, which are biomarkers from different compartments, from an immunological perspective. In essence, the value of PD-L1 × NLR may be a more accurate predictor of the risk of postoperative recurrence of lung cancer by better reflecting the immune microenvironment of the tumor than either of these values alone. PD-L1 is also expressed in immune cells [45]. In particular, PD-L1 expressed on tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) within the tumor microenvironment has been reported to contribute to the suppression of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [46, 47]. Interactions between TAMs and TANs have also been reported to contribute to tumor heterogeneity and proliferation [48]. Based on these findings, PD-L1 × NLR may also reflect interactions between neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages within the tumor microenvironment that are relevant to tumor progression.

Several limitations of the present study warrant mention. First, this was a single-center observational study. A study with a larger cohort across multiple institutes is needed to assess the reproducibility of this study and to confirm the robustness of the results. Second, this was a single-center study with a small sample size. With regard to overall survival (OS), for which there were fewer outcome cases in comparison to RFS, OS was not examined in our study because sufficient removal of confounding factors could not be performed in the multivariable analysis. Further studies are needed to collect more cases and to determine whether there is a similar trend in OS. Third, theoretically, the PD-L1 × NLR value, which may reflect the immune microenvironment of the tumor, may be a predictor of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, to confirm this assumption, the overall survival of immune checkpoint inhibitor-eligible patients needs to be evaluated, which is a future challenge. Fourth, there are limitations associated with the observational study design. Although we performed as much confounding adjustment as possible through multivariable analyses, the confounding introduced by bias due to differences in unmeasured factors between the groups remains an unaddressed issue.

Conclusion

We used multivariable analyses to evaluate the association between postoperative recurrence of NSCLC and the PD-L1 × NLR, suggesting that the value of PD-L1 × NLR reflects the tumor immune microenvironment and may represent the risk of postoperative recurrence depending on its value. PD-L1 and the NLR are biomarkers that have already been used in real-world clinical practice, and it has been reported that each has the potential to become a factor that can independently predict postoperative recurrence of lung cancer. PD-L1 × NLR values may be applied as a predictor that can easily and accurately assess the risk of postoperative recurrence of NSCLC in comparison to each value alone.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AD:

Adenocarcinoma

HR:

Hazard Ratio

NLR:

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

NSCLC:

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PD-L1:

Programmed cell death-ligand 1

PD-L1 × NLR:

Product of PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score) and the NLR

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

SCC:

Squamous cell carcinoma

TPS:

Tumor proportion score

VIF:

Variance inflation factor

95% CI:

95% Confidence interval

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Segel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Subotic D, Van Schil P, Grigoriu B. Optimising treatment for post-operative lung cancer recurrence. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(2):374–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saigi M, Alburquerque-Bejar JJ, Sanchez-Cespedea M. Determinants of immunological evasion and immunocheckpoint inhibition response in non-small-cell lung cancer: the genetic front. Oncogene. 2019;38(31):5921–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Felip E, Altorki N, Zhou C, et al. Adjuvant atezolizumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Impower010): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10308):1344–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Forde PM, Chaft JE, Smith KN, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade in Resectable Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(21):1976–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1823–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Han Y, Liu D, Li L. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: current researches in cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(3):727–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Eichhorn F, Kriegsmann M, Klotz LV, et al. Prognostic Impact of PD-L1 Expression in pN1 NSCLC: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(9):2046.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun JM, Zhou W, Choi YLk, et al. Prognostic Significance of PD-L1 in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Large Cohort Study of Surgically Resected Cases. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(7):1003–11.

  10. Cha YJ, Kim HR, Lee CY, Cho BC, Shim HS. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma and its relationship with p53 status. Lung Cancer. 2016;97:73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Handa Y, Tsutani Y, Shiroma N, et al. Prognostic impact of programmed death-ligand 1 and surrounding immune status on stage I lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020;21(4):e302–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kojima K, Sakamoto T, Kasai T, Kagawa T, Yoon H, Atagi S. PD-L1 expression as a predictor of postoperative recurrence and the association between the PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):17522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper WA, Tran T, Vilain RE, et al. PD-L1 expression is a favorable prognostic factor in early stage non-small cell carcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2015;89(2):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tuminello S, Sikavi D, Veluswamy R, et al. PD-L1 as a prognostic biomarker in surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020;9(4):1343–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bobbio A, Alifano M. Immune therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer. The future Pharmacol Res. 2015;99:217–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brostjan C, Oehler R. The role of neutrophil death in chronic inflammation and cancer. Cell Death Discov. 2020;6:26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Badalamenti G, Fanale D, Incorvaia L, et al. Role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with solid tumors: can a drop dig a stone? Cell Immunol. 2019;343: 103753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cedrés S, Torrejon D, Martinez P, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an indicator of poor prognosis in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2012;14(11):864–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Valero C, Lee M, Hoen D, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and mutational burden as biomarkers of tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu Y, Qian L, Cui J. Value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting lung cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis of 7,219 patients. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;7(3):498–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Xia L, Huang H, Xiao H, Wang D, Yang Z. Utilization of cimbined PD-L1 expression and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio prior to surgery as a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis. Trans Cancer Res. 2019;8(8):2864–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shen YJ, Qian LQ, Ding ZP, et al. Prognostic value of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma treated with surgical dissection. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 711206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Azuma K, Ota K, Kawahara A, et al. Association of PD-L1 overexpression with activating EGFR mutations in surgically resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(10):1935–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ren F, Zhao T, Liu B, Pan L. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicted prognosis for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:4235–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gu XB, Tian T, Tian XJ, Zhang XJ. Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan A, Bentzen S, Rout A, Miller K. Predicting if lung cancer will relapse—The role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2021;16(2):158–61.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(12):1503–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ito M, Miyata Y, Tsutani Y, et al. Positive EGFR mutation status is a risk of recurrence in pN0–1 lung adenocarcinoma when combined with pathological stage and histological subtype: a retrospective multi-center analysis. Lung Cancer. 2020;141:107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cao J, Yuan P, Wang Y, et al. Survival Rates after lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection for non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(5):1483–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pirker R. Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2014;3(5):305–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48(3):452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Flores RM, Ihekweazu UN, Rizk N, et al. Patterns of recurrence and incidence of second promary tumors after lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(1):59–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Demicheli R, Fornili M, Ambrogi F, et al. Recurrence dynamics for non-small-cell lung cancer: effect of surgery on the development of metastases. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(4):723–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lou F, Huang J, Sima CS, Dycoco J, Rusch V, Bach PB. Patterns of recurrence and second primary lung cancer in early-stage lung cancer survivors followed with routine computed tomography surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang X, Cao L, Li S, Wang F, Huang D, Jiang R. Combination of PD-L1 expression and NLR as prognostic marker in patients with surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Cancer. 2019;10(26):6703–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Tashima Y, Kuwata T, Yoneda K, et al. Prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression in correlation with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pirlog CF, Cotan HT, Parosanu A, et al. Correlation between pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and programmed death-ligand 1 expression as prognostic markers in non-small cell lung cancer. Cureus. 2022;14(7): e26843.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li S, Cong X, Gao H, et al. Tumor-associated neutrophils induce EMT by IL-17a to promote migration and invasion in gastric cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Liang W, Ferrara N. The complex role of neutrophils in tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4(2):83–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Aoyama T, Takano M, Miyamoto M, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was a predictor of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients. Oncology. 2019;96(5):259–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao H, Wu L, Yan G, et al. Inflammation and tumor progression: signaling pathways and targeted intervention. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Noma T, Makino T, Oshima K, et al. Immunoscore signatures in surgical specimens and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in pretreatment biopsy predict treatment efficacy and syrvival in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2023;277(3):e528–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Koh J, Kim S, Woo YD, et al. TCF1+PD-1+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict a favorable response and prolonged survival after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2022;174:10–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hangai S, Kawamura T, Kimura Y, et al. Orchestration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment by ubiquitous cellular protein TCTP released by tumor cells. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(8):947–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tang F, Zheng P. Tumor cells versus host immune cells: whose PD-L1 contributes to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade mediated cancer immunotherapy? Cell Biosci. 2018;2(8):34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Loeuillard E, Yang J, Buckarma E, et al. Targeting tumor-associated macrophages and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells augments PD-1 blockade in cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(10):5380–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang TT, Zhao YL, Peng LS, et al. Tumor-activated neutrophils in gastric cancer foster immune suppression and disease progression through GM-CSF-PD-L1 pathway. Gut. 2017;66(11):1900–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wu L, Zhang XHF. Tumor-associated neutrophils and macrophages heterogenous but not chaotic. Front Immunol. 2020;11: 553967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Thoracic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, 1180 Nagasone-Cho, Kita-Ku, Sakai-Shi, Osaka, 591-8555, Japan

    Hironobu Samejima, Kensuke Kojima, Ayako Fujiwara, Toshiteru Tokunaga & Hyungeun Yoon

  2. Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka, Japan

    Kyoichi Okishio

  3. Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka, Japan

    Kyoichi Okishio

Authors
  1. Hironobu Samejima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kensuke Kojima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ayako Fujiwara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Toshiteru Tokunaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kyoichi Okishio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hyungeun Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KK conceived and designed the study. HS and KK collected patient data. HS and KK performed the statistical analyses. HS, KK, AF, TT, KO, and HY interpreted the data. KK wrote and supervised the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kensuke Kojima.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center (KCMC) (Approval number: 2022–043) and carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board of KCMC waived the requirement for informed consent from all research participants due to the retrospective and anonymous nature of this study. Information about opting out of the study was provided on the homepage of KCMC.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 Supplemental Figure S1. A receiver operating characteristic analysis to confirm the cut-off value ofPD-L1×neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (a), PD-L1 (b) and NLR (c) for the prediction ofpostoperative recurrence.

Additional file 2:

Supplemental Figure S2. Kaplan–Meier curves showing the probability of recurrence-free survival among patients after surgery according to the value of PD-L1 (a) and NLR (b).

Additional file 3:

Supplemental Figure S3. The evaluation of the proportional hazards assumption in Cox models.

Additional file 4:

Supplemental Figure S4. The evaluation of the proportional hazards assumption in Cox models.

Additional file 5:

Supplemental Table S1. Results of a Cox proportional hazard analysis of RFS according to the product of PD-L1 and the NLR as a categorical variable.

Additional file 6:

Supplemental Table S2. Results of a Cox proportional hazard analysis of RFS according to the product of PD-L1 and the NLR as a continuous variable.

Additional file 7:

Supplemental Table S3. Results of a Cox proportional hazard analysis of RFS according to the PD-L1 as a categorical variable.

Additional file 8:

Supplemental Table S4. Results of a Cox proportional hazard analysis of RFS according to the NLR as a categorical variable.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samejima, H., Kojima, K., Fujiwara, A. et al. The combination of PD-L1 expression and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor of postoperative recurrence in non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 23, 1107 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11604-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11604-9

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us