Skip to main content
Download PDF

Integrative analysis of the molecular signature of target genes involved in the antitumor effects of cantharidin on hepatocellular carcinoma

BMC Cancer volume 23, Article number: 1161 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cantharidin (CTD) is the active ingredient of Chinese medicine, which has been traditionally used in multiple cancers treatment, especially in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, a comprehensive analysis of the CTD-related molecular mechanism is still necessary to understand its functions in HCC treatment. This study aimed to reveal the novel molecular targets and regulatory networks of CTD in HCC.

Methods

A model of H22 tumour-bearing mice was constructed, and the function of CTD in tumour growth was evaluated. An integrated approach of CTD associated transcriptional profiling and biological systems analysis was used to identify key regulators involved in antitumour pathways. The identified differential expression patterns were supported by the results of Gene Ontology (GO) term and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyse, and by protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction. The relationships between gene expression and tumour immunity were evaluated using Tumour Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER). Prognostic value was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier plotter.

Results

In the present study, the therapeutic effect of CTD on HCC was evaluated in vivo. We obtained the CTD-related transcriptional profiles, systematically and intuitively illustrated its possible pharmacological mechanisms in HCC through multiple targets and signalling pathways. These results revealed that the CTD-related differentially expressed genes were involved in autophagy, transcription factors (TFs) related transcriptional regulation, fatty acid metabolism and immune response in HCC. We found that MAPT, TOP2A, CENPF and MEFV were hub genes of CTD targets involved in autophagy regulation. Totally, 14 TFs have been confirmed to be critical for transcriptional regulation, and 33 TF targets were identified as the hub genes in transcriptional mis-regulation pathway in cancer. These TFs were associated with the immune response and immune cell infiltration. In addition, the downregulated genes were significantly enriched in metabolic regulation pathways, especially fatty acid metabolism after CTD treatment. Furthermore, the network of CTD associated miRNAs with these fatty acid metabolism-related targets was constructed in HCC.

Conclusions

Taken together, our results comprehensively elucidated that CTD could act on multiple targets in HCC therapy, affecting autophagy, transcriptional regulation, the immune response and fatty acid metabolism. Our results provide a foundation for the study of the molecular mechanistic of CTD and its clinical application in the treatment of HCC.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumours, and its prevalence and death rates have risen worldwide in recent years [1]. Statistics showed that 90% of liver cancers are hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) [1]. Traditional therapies for HCC include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. However, the cure rate is still very low, since a majority of patients present with advanced disease. In recent years, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has shown obvious advantages in liver cancer treatment, acting as a multi-target adjuvant therapy [1, 2]. Combining TCM with conventional therapeutic drugs is anticipated to increase sensitivity to effectively inhibit the development of liver cancer [1]. It has been reported that this approach could increase sensitivity to ameliorate adverse effects of chemotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with HCC [3].

Cantharidin (CTD) is a main active component in TCM, which is a bioactive sesquiterpenoid isolated from insects of the genus Mylabris. It has been reported that CTD shows obvious cytotoxic activity towards cancer cell to suppress carcinoma cell growth and proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner, especially in liver cancer [4]. However, its potential preclinical application is limited by its toxicity. It has been reported that CTD is an inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and protein phosphatase type 2 A (PP2A), that could induce cell apoptosis and effect protein synthesis [5]. CTD can accelerate apoptosis in different cancer cell lines via the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways or the endoplasmic reticulum pathway [6]. It has also been reported that CTD could increase the expression of death-related genes, including DR5, PUMA, BTG2, NOXA, GADD45 and TRB3 to induce the activation of extrinsic apoptosis pathway [7,8,9]. It promotes ATF6β, IRE1α, IRE1β, GRP78, caspase-4, calpain-2 and XBP-1 expression to induce apoptosis via the ER stress associated pathway [10,11,12,13]. In addition, CTD also effectively induce autophagy by modulating the level of several autophagy associated proteins, including Beclin-1, LC3-I/LC3-II, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway proteins [14,15,16]. Therefore, CTD is responsible for tumour destruction through apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy.

Despite the remarkable therapeutic efficacy of CTD in liver cancer, the understanding of its molecular mechanism is still limited. It has been reported that CTD inhibits HCC development through p38 MAPK, JAK2/STAT3, PI3K/Akt and LC3 related autophagy pathways [16,17,18]. It induces DNA damage via KDM4A-dependent H3K36 methylation [19]. However, the severe toxicity of CTD prevents its clinical application. Therefore, its regulatory mechanisms in HCC are still unclear. An in-depth study of CTD-related molecular regulation is not only helpful for revealing its anticancer activity but also helpful for analysing its cytotoxicity at the cellular level.

In this study, we integrated transcriptional profiling and network analysis to identify potential biomarkers and targets of CTD in HCC cells. We investigated CTD associated autophagy, transcriptional regulation, immune responses and fatty acid metabolism in HCC. The novel potential targets and their regulatory networks were confirmed in HCC. Moreover, the relationships of these hub genes with tumour immune infiltration were evaluated. CTD-related miRNAs that target fatty acid metabolism-related genes were assessed, and a fatty acid-related miRNA-target networks were constructed.

Results

Cantharidin inhibits HCC tumour growth in vivo

To confirm the antitumour function of CTD in HCC, we investigated the effect of CTD on tumour growth in vivo. The HCC mouse model was constructed based on H22 cells and the antitumour effect of CTD was evaluated. The chemical formula of CTD is shown the supplementary Figure S1. After CTD treatment, the volume and weight of tumour tissues were significantly decreased, the tumor weight was 1.99 g and 2.63 g, and the volume was 635 mm3and 798 mm3 in mouse treated with a high- and middle-doses of CTD, respectively (Fig. 1A, B). Tumor growth inhibition rates were 38.96% and 19.33% in high- and middle-doses groups, respectively. While, the effect of inhibiting tumor growth was not significant in the low dose group. Furthermore, the HE staining results showed that the number of cells was significantly reduced, and that these cells were loosely arranged in tumuor tissues. The necrotic and apoptotic cells were significantly increased in the CTD group, with increase in the number of abnormal vacuoles in the middle and high CTD concentration groups (Fig. 1C). These results indicated that CTD could inhibit tumour cell growth and promote cellular necrosis in vivo.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The cantharidin inhibits the tumor growth in mice. (A, B) Cantharidin represses the tumor cell growth in vivo. The tumor volume (A) and weight (B) were shown. Data were presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3), * p < 0.05 vs. the control group. (C) The H&E staining results of tumor tissues, including model, CTD high, middle, and low groups. The tumor tissues from model were acted as control, and the tumor tissues of CTD treatment were treated groups. (D) The volcano plot showed the differentially expressed genes between cantharidin treated groups and control group. The upregulated genes were shown by red color; the downregulated genes were shown by blue color. (E, F) The function enrichment analysis of CTD-associated differentially expressed genes was showed by (D) GO and (E) KEGG enrichment

Full size image

CTD induces apoptosis and autophagy to affect the growth of HCC cells

To further explore the novel therapeutic targets and potential mechanism of CTD in HCC, RNA-seq analysis was performed. Based on a threshold value of p value < 0.05 and |log2FoldChange| > 1, total of 7008 genes were significantly upregulated and 4973 genes were significantly downregulated in the cantharidin treated group (Fig. 1D). Subsequently, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed. The Go analysis results showed that the upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in the terms transcriptional activator activity, protein heterodimerization activity, modulation of chemical synaptic transmission and trans-synaptic terms (Fig. 1E). Next, KEGG enrichment analysis was performed, and the results showed that pathways in caner, PI3K-AKT, MAPK and RAS signaling pathways were enriched in the DEGs after CTD treatment. Moreover, these DEGs were also involved in apoptosis, autophagy and mitophagy (Fig. 1F). Therefore, CTD might affect cellular apoptosis by regulating the autophagy and mitophagy pathways in HCC.

Furthermore, apoptosis-, autophagy- and mitophagy-related gene sets were obtained from MSigDB. Venn diagram analysis was used to confirm the DEGs, in the apoptosis, autophagy and mitophagy pathways. In total, after CTD treatment, 31 apoptosis-related, 52 autophagy-related and 9 mitophagy-related genes were upregulated, while 30 autophagy-related and 31 mitophagy-related genes were downregulated (Fig. 2A, B). The heatmap of these DEGs was showed in Fig. 2C. Furthermore, KEGG enrichment analysis of these DEGs was performed and showed that these genes were also involved in NOD-like receptor, FoxO, and mTOR signalling pathways, and in oxidative phosphorylation processes (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The cantharidin related autophagy targets in HCC. (A) The venn diagram showed the apoptosis-, autophagy- and mitophagy-related DEGs after CTD treatment. (B) The number of genes in different groups. (C) Heat map showed the expression of theses genes. The upregulated genes were indicated by red color; the downregulated genes were indicated by blue color. (D) The network between the autophagy- and mitophagy-related DEGs and their involved functional pathways were drawn based on the KEGG analysis results. (E) The expression of autophagy-related DEGs of CTD in liver cancer. (F) The expression of autophagy-related DEGs were detected by RT-PCR in CTD treated HepG2 cell. The upregulated genes were indicated by red color; the downregulated genes were indicated by blue color. p < 0.05 was considered the significant difference. (G) The protein interaction network of autophagy-related DEGs after CTD treatment. The top ten hub genes were shown inside the circle. Red to green color indicated a correlation trend. Red color indicated the highest correlation. (H) The correlations between CTD regulated autophagy-related DEGs and different functional pathways in liver cancer. (I) Kaplan–Meier analysis of the relationship between hub genes and OS in patients with liver cancer. (J) A protein interaction network of phosphatases family proteins with CTD regulated autophagy- related hub genes

Full size image

We further conducted an in-depth analysis of the function of these DEGs in HCC. As shown in Fig. 2E, TOP2A, CENPF, ACSL4, SPARC, and COL4A5 were significantly upregulated in patients with liver cancer, while they were downregulated by CTD treatment in HCC cells. PLK3, C9orf72, TRIM22, RNF152, FEZ1 and MEFV were dramatically downregulated in liver cancer patients, but upregulated by CTD treatment in HCC cells (Fig. 2F). Additionally, a protein interaction network was constructed based on these autophagy-related gene set regulated by CTD. The results indicated that GABARAP, GABARAPL1, RAB7B, ALB, ATG101, RRAGC, FLCN, MEFV, MAPT were the top 10 hub genes in CTD regulated autophagy network (Fig. 2G). GSVA suggested that these hub genes also have significant relationships with the apoptosis and EMT pathways in HCC (Fig. 2H). Moreover, we found that hub genes, TOP2A, MAPT, CENPF, ATG101, MEFV, GADD45G, GABARAPL1 and C9orf72 were significantly associated with a worse prognosis in patients with HCC (Fig. 2I).

Because CTD acts as a protein phosphatases inhibitor, we obtained phosphatases family proteins PP1, PP2A and PP5 and constructed a protein interaction network with the CTD-related hub genes. We found that ATG101, MAPT, TOP2A, MAP2K1, PLK3 and NOD2 directly interact with phosphatases to combine with other autophagy-related genes to induce apoptosis in HCC cells (Fig. 2J). Therefore, MAPT, TOP2A, CENPF and MEFV were identified as hub genes of CTD targets that regulate autophagy and also sever as oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes to affect the prognosis of patients with liver cancer.

CTD is involved in transcriptional regulation in HCC

Because the KEGG analysis results indicated that the transcriptional mis-regulated in cancer pathway was enriched in the CTD regulated DEGs, we focused on CTD-associated differentially expressed TFs in HCC. In total, 356 upregulated and 127 downregulated TFs were identified in CTD treated HCC cells (Fig. 3A). KEGG analysis showed that the upregulated TFs were involved in the transcriptional misregulation in cancer. As shown in Fig. 3B, these TFs were associated with pathways in cancer, including the apoptosis, cellular senescence, mitophagy, cell cycle and miRNAs in cancer pathways. Moreover, they were also involved in the regulation of multiple tumour-related signalling pathways, such as p53, MAPK, NF-kappa B, TNF, and IL-17 signalling pathways in HCC.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The transcriptional mis-regulation involved targets of cantharidin in HCC. (A) The venn diagram showed the different expression of TFs after cantharidin treatment. (B) The pathways that were associated with the cantharidin regulated TFs in HCC based on the KEGG results. (C) The protein interaction network of cantharidin regulated TFs that were involved in transcriptional misregulation after cantharidin treatment. Yellow color indicates the DEGs that were involved in transcriptional misregulation. Dark green indicates the hub TFs of this network. The orange color indicated C2H2 family, the brown color indicated bHLH family, turquoise color indicated bZIP family, green color indicated the other type TFs. (D) The KEGG enrichment analysis result of CTD-regulated hub TFs and genes were involved in transcriptional mis-regulation pathway in cancer

Full size image

Furthermore, the protein interaction network of these TFs was constructed based on the STRING database. We classified these CTD-regulated transcription factors and found that the top three TF families were C2H2, bHLH, and bZIP family. As shown in Fig. 3C, the transcription factors subset, which were directly involved in the transcriptional misregulation pathway, were marked in yellow and dark green. Among them, the CTD regulated hub TFs were  SPI1, PAX5, MEF2C, HOXA11, PBX1, SIX4, NR4A3, PBX3, REL, RUNX1, PAX3, RUNX2, ERG, and RARA. (Fig. 3C). In addition, GO enrichment analysis indicated that these hub TFs were enriched in the Th17, Th1 and Th1 cell differentiation pathways and in the PD-L1 expression and PD-1 checkpoint pathway. These results suggested that CTD-targeted TFs likely participate in the regulation of anti-tumor immune responses in HCC (Fig. 3D).

The effects of cantharidin on immune responses in HCC

To further insight into the expression of CTD-related genes involved in signalling pathways in HCC, GSEA was performed. The results showed that CTD-related genes were positively associated with the terms related to immune responses in HCC, including immunoglobulin mediated immune response, humoral immune response mediated by circulating immunoglobulin, regulation of humoral immune response, negative regulation of macrophage activation, and chemokine biosynthetic process (Fig. 4A). In additions, the association results indicated that the CTD-regulated genes, which were involved in the transcriptional misregulation, were dramatically associated with the infiltration of immune cells in liver cancer. The infiltration score showed that the expression of these genes was positively associated with the infiltration of immune cells, including Tfh, CD4 + T cells, macrophages, and DC cells, while negatively associated with the infiltration of neutrophils and Th17 cells (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the relationships between the CTD-related differentially expressed TFs and the infiltration of immune cells were also evaluated. The results suggested that the expression of these TFs was significantly positively associated with the infiltration of immune cells, including central memory cells, CD4 + T cells, CD4 + naïve T cells and iTreg cells (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, we assessed the expression of these immune-related genes in liver cancer based on the TCGA database, and identified 33 genes were significantly downregulated in liver cancer (Fig. 4D). Moreover, the infiltration score also indicated that their expression was significantly associated with infiltration of CD4 + T cells and macrophages, and negatively correlated with infiltration of B cells and effector memory cells (Fig. 4E). Considering these results collectively, we speculated that CTD likely affects antitumour immune response by upregulating the expression of these TFs to activate immune response pathways and induce the infiltration of immune cells in HCC.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The cantharidin associated TFs were involved in immune response. (A) GO functional annotation showed that cantharidin regulated DEGs were positively associated with immune response, macrophage activation and chemokine biosynthetic processes based on GSEA analysis. (B, C) The heatmap showed the correlation between immune infiltration and CTD-regulated transcriptional genes (B) and hub TF genes (C). (D) The heatmap showed the CTD regulated DEGs and its expression was decreased in LIHC patients based on TCGA data. (E) The correlation between immune infiltration and these down-regulated genes in LIHC. The immune infiltration was analyzed using the GSCA tools. Red color indicated positive correlation; bule color indicated negative correlation. * P < 0.05; # FDR < 0.05

Full size image

CTD regulates metabolic pathways in HCC

To further evaluate the mechanism of CTD in HCC therapy, GO enrichment analysis of genes down-regulated by CTD was examined, and the results showed that they were associated with metabolic pathways (Fig. 5A). Moreover, GSEA showed that they were significantly involved in the negative regulation of fatty acid metabolic processes and the PPAR signalling pathway (Fig. 5B), suggesting that CTD has advantages in ameliorating cancer cell metabolic reprogramming, especially fatty acid metabolic regulation, in HCC. In addition, 154 the fatty acid metabolism-, 55 fatty acids catabolic-, 54 fatty acid oxidation-, 41 fatty acid beta-oxidation-, and 60 fatty acid biosynthetic-related genes were obtained from MigBD (Fig. 5C). The venn diagram showed that totally 34 fatty acid metabolic processes related genes were downregulated by CTD (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, the network of fatty acid- related genes down regulated by CTD with metabolic pathways was confirmed based on KEGG analysis (Fig. 5E).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Cantharidin down-regulated genes were involved in fatty acid metabolism. (A) The KEGG enrichment analysis indicated that CTD down regulated genes were involved in metabolism pathways, including fatty acid and steroid. (B) CTD downregulated genes were positively associated with fatty acid metabolic process and PPAR signaling pathway based on GSEA analysis. (C) Statistical analysis showed the fatty acid metabolism-related gene sets from the MSigDB. (D) The venn diagram showed the overlap between CTD down regulated gene set and fatty acid metabolism-related gene sets. (E) The network was shown the relations between CTD down regulated genes and fatty acid and steroid metabolic processes pathways

Full size image

To confirm the hub genes of CTD-targets about fatty acid metabolism regulation in HCC, we assessed the expression of these genes in the LIHC dataset in TCGA. We found that the expression levels of eight genes, namely, CYP7A1, AKR1C3, DAGLA, ACLY, ACACA, BRCA1, MAPK3, and ELOVL5 were increased in LIHC and that their upregulation were indicated a poor prognosis in patients with HCC (Fig. 6A, B). Moreover, their protein levels also dramatically elevated in LIHC patients (Fig. 6C). However, their expression levels were significantly decreased after CTD treatment (Fig. 6D). In addition, we explored the reason for affecting the expression of these genes. We focused on the regulation of miRNA during antitumor therapy of CTD in liver cancer. A network between fatty acid metabolism-related hub genes and miRNAs was constructed (Fig. 6E). The expression of miRNAs in this network was elevated after CTD treatment in HCC. The corresponding expression heatmap was shown in Fig. 6F. Among these miRNAs, the miRNAs with upregulated expression were selected and verified for expression after CTD treatment. A total of 8 upregulated miRNAs were identified (Fig. 6G). Taken together, CTD-upregulated miRNAs and their targets were identified, including miR654-5p/miR423-5p/miR27a-3p/ACACA, miR132-3p/miR3065-5p/miR323-5p/ELOVL5, miR132-3p/DAGLA, miR181a/b-5p/miR543/miR221-3p miR330-3p/CYP7A1, miR935/ACLY, miR342-5p/MAPK3, miR379-5p/BRCA1, which were involved in fatty acid metabolism pathway. Therefore, CTD may target these miRNAs to suppress the expression of fatty acid metabolism-related hub genes to inhibit tumour cell growth in HCC.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Cantharidin regulated miRNA to suppress the expression of genes related to fatty acid metabolism. (A) The CTD downregulated fatty acid metabolism-related gene were elevated in LIHC. The heatmap showed the expression of these genes in LIHC. (B) The genes indicated poor prognosis and involved in fatty acid metabolic process were confirmed. The red color indicated positive correlation; bule color indicated negative correlation. (C) The expressions of key genes related to fatty acid metabolism were assessed by RT-PCR in CTD treated HepG2 cell. (D) The protein level of genes related to fatty acid metabolism in patients with HCC. (E) The network of miRNAs targeting the key fatty acid metabolism related genes after CTD treatment. (F) The heatmap showed the predicted miRNA genes expression in CTD treated HepG2 cells. (G) The expression of CTD upregulated miRNAs related to fatty acid metabolism in HCC cells

Full size image

Discussion

HCC has become one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide due to its heterogeneity and dismal prognosis. In recent years, traditional Chinese medicines, particularly formulas, have demonstrated obvious advantages in the treatment of liver cancer. These benefits involve multiple targets and biological pathways. In this study, the transcriptional regulatory effects of cantharidin in HCC cells were analysed comprehensively. This study not only provides a foundation for molecular mechanistic research of the anti-tumour effective of CTD in HCC but also beneficial for understanding the cytotoxicity of CTD in liver cells.

Accumulating evidence suggests that inhibiting autophagy can induce apoptosis during anticancer therapy. It has been confirmed taht sodium cantharidate could induce apoptosis and autophagy by inhibiting the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway [15]. NCTD-induced apoptosis is enhanced by ATG5 and LC3, which were associated with autophagy pathway in HCC [20, 21]. Our results also showed that CTD was involved in inhibiting autophagy to induce apoptosis in HCC cells. However, we found several novel targets of CTD related to autophagy that had not been previously reported, such as GABARAP, GABARAPL1, ALB, RAB7B, ATG101, GLCN, MEFV, NOD, and MAPT. Moreover, we confirmed that the CTD-downregulated genes TOP2A, CENPF, ACSL4, SPARC, and COL4A5 were significantly increased in liver cancer patients, while upregulated genes PLK3, C9orf72, TRIM22, RNF152, FEZ1 and MEFV were dramatically decreased in liver cancer patients. Among them, TOP2A, CENPF, MEFV and C9orf72 directly affect the prognosis of patients with liver cancer. Therefore, we speculated that these genes are likely the direct antitumor targets of CTD resulting in autophagy inhibition induced apoptosis.

It has been reported that the anticancer mechanisms of CTD are associated with its activity as an inhibitor of protein phosphatases (PP), including PP1, PP2A and PP5, to induce the formation of DNA strand breaks and cell apoptosis [22,23,24]. Moreover, phosphatases play an important role in the regulation of autophagy or mitophagy, and it has identified that many of the core autophagy proteins are as the direct targets of phosphatases [25, 26]. In this study, we further integrate analyzed the network between protein phosphatases and CTD-related autophagy gene set. The hub genes of CTD-related autophagy ATG101, MAPT, TOP2A, MAP2K1, PLK3 and NOD2 were confirmed that could directly interact with phosphatases PP1, PP2A and PP5. We speculated that CTD targets these genes through phosphatases to induce apoptosis or autophagy, which will contribute to the treatment of HCC and exert the best antitumour effect in HCC.

It is well known that the inhibitory effects of traditional Chinese medicines and natural medicines on tumours are reflected at multiple levels and in multiple pathways. While, transcription factors (TFs) are key regulators of cellular processes [27]. Therefore, the antitumor function of CTD involving multiple signaling pathways may be attributed to its targeting of numerous TFs. We constructed a CTD-dependent TF interaction network and found that these hub genes in CTD-related transcriptional regulation were SPI, PAX5, MEF2C, HOXA11, PBX1, SIX4, NR4A3, PBX3, REL, RUNX1, PAX3, RUNX2, ERG, and RARA. In addition, these TFs were involved in immune response- and immunotherapy-related pathways. Considering these results collectively, we speculated that CTD inhibits tumour progression by integrating multiple transcription factor networks related signaling pathways.

Studies have shown that traditional Chinese medicine has antitumor activity by inhibiting the overexpression of immune checkpoint molecules and enhancing the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy [28]. Therefore, the regulatory function of CTD on tumour immunity cannot be ignored. However, the molecular mechanism of CTD in tumour infiltrating lymphocytes remains unelucidated. In this study, the GSEA results indicated that the DEGs after CTD treatment were involved in immune responses and in macrophage and chemokine biosynthetic processes. Moreover, CTD-related TFs were associated with immune cell infiltration, especially CD4 + T cells, Treg cells and neutrophil infiltration. In particular, the significantly upregulated oncogenes after CTD treatment were correlated with the infiltration of macrophages, CD4 T cells and B cells. This is consistent with previously reported results that cantharidin combination therapy will promote increases in CD8 + T cells and CD4 + Teff cells among tumour infiltrating lymphocytes to inhibit lung cancer growth [29]. CTD likely promotes the activation of transcription genes that plays a role in antitumour immune activation in liver cancer. The liver is a major organ for fatty acid metabolism and synthesis. It has been confirmed that fatty acid metabolism is critically involved in the progression of multiple cancers and the hepatotoxicity of drugs, especially traditional Chinese medicines [30,31,32]. Here, we found that the CTD downregulated genes were associated with metabolic pathways, especially fatty acid metabolism and steroid biosynthesis. Moreover, we constructed the miRNA-target network of these hub genes. CTD regulates fatty acid metabolism thought targeting these potential miRNAs to downregulate identified hub genes enriching in fatty acid metabolism pathways. Finally, we constructed a CTD associated function and molecular regulation network of these hub genes involved in the autophagy, transcriptional misregulation and fatty acid metabolism pathways (Fig. 7A, B). Cantharidin inhibits tumor growth by integrating multiple pathway networks in HCC.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Cantharidin inhibits tumor growth by integrating multiple pathway networks. (A) Cantharidin inhibits tumor growth by regulating autophagy or mitophagy, TF-related transcriptional regulation, and fatty acid metabolism pathways. (B) The molecular regulatory network of CTD function related hub genes in above pathways. Yellow and blue showed autophagy- or mitophagy-related genes; blue color showed genes could directly interact with phosphatases; red color represented fatty acid metabolism related genes; green color indicated TFs

Full size image

Materials and methods

Reagents and cells

Cantharidin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, China (C7632, purity ≥ 98%). H22 and HepG2 cells were obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Cell culture

All cells were cultured in a 6-well plate with DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium) (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (foetal bovine serum) (Gibco, USA), 100 µg/ mL streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin (Sigma, USA). All cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere with saturated humidity.

Establishment of animal model

The H22 mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma ascites was established to confirm the antitumour function of cantharidin in vivo. H22 cells (5 × 107 cells) were obtained and injected into BALB/c male mice, which were purchased from Shanghai Laboratory Animal Centre (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China). The axillary skin of the left forelimb of each mouse was disinfected with alcohol, and then 0.2 mL of diluted tumour cell suspension was injected subcutaneously. The tumour sizes were measured every three days. The model was considered to be successfully established when tumour tissue appeared in axillae of the mice after one week. Then, the H22 tumour-bearing mice were randomly divided into four groups, including the model group and three CTD treatment groups (n = 10 per group). Model group was treated with saline solution orally as control, treated groups that were therapy with different doses of CTD (low (0.25 mg/kg), middle (0.5 mg/kg) and high (1.0 mg/kg). The mice were weighed every 3 days during the drug treatment. After two weeks, the mice were fasted for 12 h and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The tumours were obtained and weighed before washing in normal saline.

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining

Tumour tissues were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The tissues were dehydrated with 75% ethanol and embedded in paraffin. The samples were sliced into 4 μm-thick sections and dewaxed with xylene. Then, the sections were rehydrated through an ethanol gradient and stained using hematoxylin. Next, the sections were immersed in hydrochloric acid alcohol differentiation solution for 30 s, followed by eosin solution for 2 min. The sections were visualized and photographed using a digital scanning microscope.

RNA-seq analysis

Total RNA was isolated by the TRIzol method (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA samples were sequenced using the HiSeqTM 2500 system (Illumina). RNA-seq analysis was performed by Novogene Corporation Inc. (Beijing, China). The differences in the expression matrices generated from the sequencing data were analyzed with an R package. Gene expression profiles were constructed using the DESeq2 package. The differentially expressed genes identified by RNA-Seq were listed in the Supplementary materials.

Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analysis

To explore the underlying biological mechanism and pathways of the DEGs, GO analysis, KEGG analysis and Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were used to confirm the functional and pathway based on the clusterProfiler package in the R platform [33]. GSEA hallmark gene sets were obtained from MSigDB (http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb). p < 0.05 was set as the significance threshold.

Construction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network

The PPI networks were constructed based on the STRING database and then visualized by Cytoscape software. The hub genes in these networks were confirmed with the Cytohubba plug-in in Cytoscape.

Immune infiltration analysis

The expression of CTD related target genes was confirmed based on the TCGA LIHC database. The correlations between the expression of these genes and the infiltration of 25 types of immune cells were evaluated in LIHC based on GSCA (Gene Set Cancer Analysis) data.

Prognostic analysis

To confirm the relationships between the CTD-related hub target genes and the prognosis of patients with liver cancer, the Kaplan-Meier Plotter was used to analyse the prognostic value of these genes in LIHC. p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant differrnce.

Real-time-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using RNA Plus reagent (Takara, China) and reverse transcribed using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, China). A SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, China) kit was used to determine the mRNA level of each gene. The assay was performed in the Thermal Cycler CFX6 System (Bio Rad, USA).

Human protein atlas analysis

The protein levels of the target genes of CTD were assessed by immunohistochemistry based on the Human Protein Atlas, an online tool that contains data for protein expression in LIHC.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were independently repeated three times. The data are summarized as the means ± standard deviations (SD). Student’s t-test was used to analysed the differences between two groups, while one-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of differences among multiple groups, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc tests. The results were considered to be statistically significant when the value of p was < 0.05.

Conclusion

This study set out to investigate and expand the possible functions of CTD in liver cancer therapy. We predicted the potential targets of CTD in HCC based on a comprehensive integrated analysis of its transcriptional profiles. The novel CTD target genes associated with autophagy, transcriptional misregulation and fatty acid metabolism were found, and network modules of theses pathways related-target genes were obtained. Moreover, miRNAs related to the regulation of fatty acid metabolism were confirmed, and a miRNA-mRNA network was constructed. In addition, these identified hub genes also play an important role in the immune response and tumour infiltration lymphocytes in HCC. Considered collectively, the integrated targets network of CTD will provide a novel way for exploring its function and mechanism in HCC therapy (Fig. 7). Interesting, metabolism-related genes, such as BRCA1, MAPK3, CYP7A1, and AKR1C3, serve as the core nodes of this network connecting other pathways, including phosphatase interacting and non-interacting auto/mitophagy pathways, TF dependent transcriptional regulation and immune response after CTD treatment in HCC. These findings are expected to guide to the application of CTD in the clinical treatment of liver cancer.

Data Availability

The raw datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the GSA (Genome Sequence Archive) for human. GSA accession number was HRA004466 (subHRA006393). The database link was https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/search/?dbId=hra&q=HRA004466. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Yao M, Liang S, Cheng B. Role of exosomes in hepatocellular carcinoma and the regulation of traditional Chinese medicine. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1110922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1110922. eCollection 2023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh AK, Singh SV, Kumar R, Kumar S, Senapati S, Pandey AK. Current therapeutic modalities and chemopreventive role of natural products in Liver cancer. Progress and Promise World J Hepatol. 2023;15(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fan Y, Xue H, Zheng H. Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Updates and Outlook. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2022; 9:233–263. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S358082. eCollection 2022.

  4. Naz F, Wu Y, Zhang N, Yang Z, Yu C. Anticancer attributes of Cantharidin: involved Molecular mechanisms and pathways. Molecules. 2020;25(14):3279. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ren Y, Kinghorn AD. Antitumor potential of the protein phosphatase inhibitor, cantharidin, and selected derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem. 2021;32:116012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuo JH, Chu YL, Yang JS, Lin JP, Lai KC, Kuo HM, Hsia TC, Chung JG. Cantharidin induces apoptosis in human Bladder cancer TSGH 8301 cells through mitochondria-dependent signal pathways. Int J Oncol. 2010;37(5):1243–50. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kashyap D, Garg VK, Goel N. Intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis: role in cancer development and prognosis. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2021;125:73–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2021.01.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Thomas HR, Li Z, Yeo NCF, Scott HE, Dang N, Hossain MI, Andrabi SA, Parant JM. Puma, noxa, p53, and p63 differentially mediate stress pathway induced apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(7):659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-03902-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Zhu D, Hou L, Hu B, Xu M, Meng X. TRB3 reverses chemotherapy resistance and mediates crosstalk between endoplasmic reticulum stress and AKT signaling pathways in MHCC97H human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(1):1343–9. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lan HY, An P, Liu QP, Chen YY, Yu YY, Luan X, Tang JY, Zhang H. Aidi injection induces apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the mitochondrial pathway. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;2 74:114073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2021.114073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu F, Duan C, Zhang J, Li X. Cantharidin-induced LO2 cell autophagy and apoptosis via endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in vitro. J Appl Toxicol. 2020;40(12):1622–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ren Y, Zhang SW, Xie ZH, Xu XM, Chen LL, Lou ZG, Weng GB, Yao XP. Cantharidin induces G2/M arrest and triggers apoptosis in renal cell carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14(6):5614–8. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng S, Zhu J, Xia K, Yu W, Wang Y, Wang J, Li F, Yang Z, Yang X, Liu B, Tao H, Liang C. Cantharidin inhibits anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins and induces apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cell lines MG-63 and MNNG/HOS via Mitochondria-Dependent Pathway. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:6742–9. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Li HC, Xia ZH, Chen YF, Yang F, Feng W, Cai H, Mei Y, Jiang YM, Xu K, Feng DX. Cantharidin inhibits the growth of Triple-negative Breast Cancer cells by suppressing Autophagy and Inducing apoptosis in Vitro and in vivo. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;43(5):1829–40. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pang JL, Xu LS, Zhao Q, Niu WW, Rong XY, Li SS, Li X. Sodium cantharidate promotes autophagy in Breast cancer cells by inhibiting the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1000377. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1000377. eCollection 2022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tao R, Sun WY, Yu DH, Qiu W, Yan WQ, Ding YH, Wang GY, Li HJ. Sodium cantharidinate induces HepG2 cell apoptosis through LC3 autophagy pathway. Oncol Rep. 2017;38(2):1233–9. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu M, Shi X, Gong Z, Su Q, Yu R, Wang B, Yang T, Dai B, Zhan Y, Zhang D, Zhang Y. Cantharidin treatment inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma development by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 and PI3K/Akt pathways in an EphB4-dependent manner. Pharmacol Res. 2020;158:104868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104868.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng IC, Hsieh MJ, Chen PN, Hsieh YH, Ho HY, Yang SF, Yeh CB. Cantharidic acid induces apoptosis through the p38 MAPK signaling pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Environ Toxicol. 2018;33(3):261–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.22513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei C, Deng X, Gao S, Wan X, Chen J. Cantharidin Inhibits Proliferation of Liver Cancer by Inducing DNA Damage via KDM4A-Dependent Histone H3K36 Demethylation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022:2197071. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2197071. eCollection 2022.

  20. Xiong X, Wu M, Zhang H, Li J, Lu B, Guo Y, Zhou T, Guo H, Peng R, Li X, Tian Q, Wang Y. Atg5 siRNA inhibits autophagy and enhances norcantharidin-induced apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2015;47(4):1321–8. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.3103. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nazim UM, Yin H, Park SY. Downregulation of c–FLIP and upregulation of DR–5 by cantharidin sensitizes TRAIL–mediated apoptosis in Prostate cancer cells via autophagy flux. Int J Mol Med. 2020;46(1):280–8. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2020.4566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Swingle MR, Honkanen RE. Inhibitors of Serine/Threonine protein phosphatases: biochemical and structural studies provide insight for further development. Curr Med Chem. 2019;26(15):2634–60. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867325666180508095242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu MD, Liu SL, Zheng BB, Wu J, Wu MY, Zhang Y, Gong FR, Tao M, Zhang J, Li W. The radiotherapy-sensitization effect of cantharidin: mechanisms involving cell cycle regulation, enhanced DNA damage, and inhibited DNA damage repair. Pancreatology. 2018;18(7):822–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.08.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li W, Xie L, Chen Z, Zhu Y, Sun Y, Miao Y, Xu Z, Han X. Cantharidin, a potent and selective PP2A inhibitor, induces an oxidative stress-independent growth inhibition of Pancreatic cancer cells through G2/M cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(5):1226–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01523.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Licheva M, Raman B, Kraft C, Reggiori F. Phosphoregulation of the autophagy machinery by kinases and phosphatases. Autophagy. 2022;18(1):104–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2021.1909407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. He YL, Li J, Gong SH, Cheng X, Zhao M, Cao Y, Zhao T, Zhao YQ, Fan M, Wu HT, Zhu LL, Wu LY. BNIP3 phosphorylation by JNK1/2 promotes mitophagy via enhancing its stability under hypoxia. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(11):966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05418-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Weidemüller P, Kholmatov M, Petsalaki E, Zaugg JB. Transcription factors: bridge between cell signaling and gene regulation. Proteomics. 2021;21(23–24):e2000034. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202000034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xie J, Huang H, Li X, Ouyang L, Wang L, Liu D, Wei X, Tan P, Tu P, Hu Z. The role of traditional Chinese Medicine in Cancer Immunotherapy: current status and future directions. Am J Chin Med. 2023 Aug;28:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X2350074X.

  29. Zhang Y, Yang SL, Zhang HR, Gao L, Gao X, Liu PJ, Yi ZY, Li N, Xu ZQ. Combination radiotherapy and cantharidin inhibits Lung cancer growth through altering Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Future Oncol. 2017;13(13):1173–80. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2016-0437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Liu X, Niu L, Li Q. Proteomics Analysis reveals an important role for the PPAR Signaling Pathway in DBDCT-Induced Hepatotoxicity mechanisms. Molecules. 2017;22(7):1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22071113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Su D, Liao Z, Feng B, Wang T, Shan B, Zeng Q, Song J, Song Y. Pulsatilla chinensis saponins cause liver injury through interfering ceramide/sphingomyelin balance that promotes lipid metabolism dysregulation and apoptosis. Phytomedicine. 2020;76:153265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gu X, Li S, Lu M, Li Y, Wang Q, Chen L, Jia Y, Cao S, Zhang T, Zhou M, Gou X. Investigation of Gynura segetum root extract (GSrE) induced hepatotoxicity based on metabolomic signatures and microbial community profiling in rats. Front Microbiol. 2022; 13: 947757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.947757. eCollection 2022.

  33. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Morishima K, Tanabe M. New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D590–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky962.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2020MS08132, 2023MS08033), Science and Technology Major Project of Inner Mongolia (KCBJ2018021), Technology Program of Inner Mongolia for Cultivation of Young Scientists (NMGIRT2228).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Basic medical, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China

    Jia Yan, Xiu ling Deng & Hai sheng Wang

  2. School of Public health, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China

    Yu min Gao

  3. Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China

    Gui tao Shi

Authors
  1. Jia Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu min Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiu ling Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hai sheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gui tao Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Hai sheng Wang designed the project. Jia Yan wrote the manuscript. Xiu ling Deng, Gui tao Shi and Yu min Gao completed all experiments. All data analysis was performed by Jia Yan. Hai sheng Wang provided reagents and participated in the preparation of the manuscript. All authors provided critical feedback on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiu ling Deng, Hai sheng Wang or Gui tao Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study does not involve Humans/Human data/Human samples. The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional of the ethics committee of Inner Mongolia medical university. The approval number is YKD202102034. We confirm that all methods in the study were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The animal studies were performed accordance with ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org), and all procedures for animal experiments followed the ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, J., Gao, Y.m., Deng, X.l. et al. Integrative analysis of the molecular signature of target genes involved in the antitumor effects of cantharidin on hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 23, 1161 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11594-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11594-8

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us