- Research
- Open access
- Published:
S100A family is a group of immune markers associated with poor prognosis and immune cell infiltration in hepatocellular carcinoma
BMC Cancer volume 23, Article number: 637 (2023)
Abstract
Background
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common human cancers with poor prognosis in the world. HCC has become the second leading cause of cancer-related death in China. It is urgent to identify novel biomarker and valid target to effectively diagnose, treat or predict the prognosis of HCC. It has been reported that S100A family is closely related to cell proliferation and migration of different cancers. However, the values of S100As in HCC remain to be further analyzed.
Methods
We investigated the transcriptional and translational expression of S100As, as well as the value of this family in HCC patients from the various databases.
Results
S100A10 was most relevant to HCC.
Conclusions
The results from HCC patients’ tissues and different cells also confirmed the role of S100A10 in HCC. Furthermore, we proved that S100A10 could influenced the cell proliferation of HCC cells via ANXA2/Akt/mTOR pathway. However, it would appear that the relationship between S100A10 and HCC is complex and requires more research.
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent liver primary cancer and represents the sixth malignant neoplasm and the third cause of cancer-associated deaths worldwide [1, 2]. HCC can be treated by surgical resection, interventional therapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and liver transplantation, etc., but only surgical treatment for the early stage of HCC is known as radical treatment [3, 4]. However, most patients with HCC are usually diagnosed as III or IV stage at the first visit, therefore they are not eligible for radical treatment [5]. Despite the widespread use of local interventional therapy combined with targeted therapies or immunotherapy for advanced HCC in the last decade, the overall prognosis of HCC remains poor [6]. Therefore, it is crucial to identify prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets associated with HCC.
The S100A protein is a calcium-binding protein that has only been detected in vertebrates, and its coding gene S100A is localized on chromosome 1q21 [7]. It has been reported that S100A proteins are a family of small acidic proteins (10–12 kDa) that are profoundly involved in regulating transcription, differentiation, survival, proliferation and motility of cells [8]. Recently, experimental and clinical researches illustrate that the expression of some S100A proteins in various tumors is extremely associated with poor prognosis and tumor development [9,10,11]. Therefore, they are potentially important tumor diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. For instance, previous studies reported that S100A2 and S100A10 were the negative biomarker for pancreatic cancer (PC), while S100A4 was profoundly involved in the chemoresistance and survival in are negative prognostic biomarkers in PC cells [12,13,14]. Besides, it has been reported that S100A families related to various tumor cell proliferation partly dependent on PI3K/AKT signaling pathway [15]. However, the relationship between S100A families and proliferation or apoptosis of HCC( Over-expression of S100A2 in pancreatic cancer correlates with progression and poor prognosis. S100A10, a novel biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. S100A4 contributes to the suppression of BNIP3 expression, chemoresistance, and inhibition of apoptosis in pancreatic cancer), Whether the expression change of this family member has a certain correlation with the proliferation and apoptosis of hepatoma cells is not clear. In addition, the role of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in the proliferation of HCC regulated by S100A needs to be further explored.
In the study, various public databases and experimental analysis were used, we extended the research field of HCC with the purpose to determine the values of S1001A in HCC. Moreover, the role of S100A10 was in the cell growth and apoptosis of HCC and the underlying mechanism was also determined. The findings in the present study indicated the relationship between S100As and HCC development, especially S100A10. It also provided a potential mechanism of S100A10 in promoting HCC proliferation and development via PI3K/mTOR pathway.
Materials and methods
Identification of S100As mRNA status
The expression of S100As mRNA levels were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database(http://cancergenome.nih.gov/)that is a comprehensive database with coordination program of gene expression and clinical information. The database is a landmark cancer genomics program that covers more than 20,000 primary cancer tissues. It also provides researchers with detailed clinical and pathological information of 33 human cancers. We downloaded the high-throughput RNA-sequencing data in Hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and the clinical information data. The transcript expression levels were estimated using the fragments per kilobase per million fragments mapped (FPKM) method in HTSeq. After R package (ggplot2[3.3.6], stats[4.2.1] and car) is analyzed by R software (4.2.1), Visualize the data with the ggplot2 package.
Identification of S100As protein status
In the present study, in addition to analyze the mRNA levels of S100As, the expression of S100As proteins were supplied by the data of Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) Confirmatory/Discovery dataset for LIHC. The subtypes, based on proteome, could be inspected in exterior tumor proteomic datasets. In our study, the protein expressions of S100As between LIHC samples and corresponding normal samples were performed, the statically remarkable difference was considered when P < 0.001.
Analysis of survival data and drawing of ROC curve
Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (Gepia2) website (http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/) was applied to analyze the survival data related to different cancer patients in the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database (www.gtexportal.org). The influence of S100As gene expression level on the prognosis of each tumor was analyzed. Besides, the survival data of HCC patients were obtained from the TCGA database. According to the median of S100As mRNA expression, all HCC patients were divided into S100As mRNA high expression group and S100As mRNA low expression group. Finally, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve was drawn by the survminer package and the survival package to analyze the effect of the expression level of S100As gene on the clinical prognosis of HCC patients. Furthermore, the results from the TCGA database were verified again through the Kaplan-Meier Plotter website. The Kaplan-Meier Plotter website (www.kmplot.com/) is able to assess the impact of 54k genes (mRNA, miRNA, protein) on survival of 21 cancer types including HCC. The website data comes from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA), and TCGA. Then, the clinical diagnostic effects of S100A10 and AFP were compared by the pROC package, and the ROC curve was drawn by the ggplot2 package.
Analysis of protein-protein interaction network
String website (https://string-db.org) is a database to predict protein-protein interactions (including at least 6 K million proteins). The protein-protein interactions include direct (physical) and indirect (functional) associations. By inputting S100A gene into the search column, we can directly obtain The Protein-protein Interaction (PPI) network information map and the interaction correlation coefficient between proteins (the combination score > 0.7 is regarded as close relationship).
GSEA and GO KEGG analysis
In this study, we analyzed the correlation between S100A10 mRNA expression and all other genes. the cluster Profiler package was applied for GSEA analysis and the org.Hs.eg.db package and cluster Profiler package were used for GO KEGG [16,17,18] analysis. |ES|>1, P < 0.05, and FDR < 0.25 were considered statistically significant.
Analysis of tumor-related immune infiltration
The Tumor Immune Estimation Resource Web Server (TIMER) is a comprehensive resource for systematic analysis of immune infiltration in different cancer types. In order to analyze the correlation between the expression of S100A10 and immune infiltration in HCC tissues, first six types of immune cells including B cells, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, neutrophils, macrophages and dendritic cells were obtained in the TIMER database. Next, the CD8 + T cell, CD4 + T cell, T regulatory cell infiltration and s100a10 expression were calculated through this website. Then, the relationship between each immune cell marker and the S100A10 expression was analyzed. Also, the coefficient value (R) and corresponding P value of the correlation between S100A10 and immune cell marker were obtained from GEPIA.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
The patients whose tissue were used for the present research were provided by informed consent. the HCC tissue samples and adjacent non-tumor tissue samples T were collected at the Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China, In brief, paraffin-embedded tissues sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated. 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was used to block the endogenous peroxidase activity for 30 min at RT, and then the sections were pre-treated with sodium citrate buffer (pH = 6) for 30 min following pressure cooker heat mediated antigen retrieval. The specific primary anti-S100A10 antibody was used to incubate each tissue Sect. (1:1000, 5529; CellSignaling Technology, Danvers, MA, United States) at 4 °C overnight。 Subsequently, the section were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody at 37 °C for 45 min and stained with 3, 3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) solution. The section was counterstained with haematoxylin, and observed under a microscope.
Cell culture and transfection
L02, HepG2, Huh7, LM3 and SNU449 cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Corning) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Si-S100A10 (cat. no. sc-36,338, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and scrambled siRNA (si-NC, cat. no. sc-37,007, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were applied to silence the expression of S100A10. HCC cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells per well. Then, cells were transfected with 100 nM siRNA by using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Approximately 48 h later, the expression of S100A10 was verified by Western blot.
Overexpression of S100A10 in HepG2 cells
Transfection was performed in HepG2 cells according to the standard instruction. Briefly, HepG2 cells were seeded in 100-mm cell culture tissue at 2 × 106 cells/well for 6 ~ 8 h. Then the cells transfected with overexpression clone lentiviral of S100A10 (ov-e) and empty vector (EV) from Genechem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). After 5 days of cell expansion and maintence in DMEM medium with 10% FBS, 1.5 µg/ml puromycin was used to select stable HepG2 cell lines expressing S100A10.
RNA isolation, reverse transcription and QRT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from all cells according to the kit instructions (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The mRNA expression of S100A10 was detected by by the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). The primer sequences of mRNAs as follow: GAPDH-F: GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC; GAPDH-R TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA; S100A10-F: AACAAAGGAGGACCTGAGAGTAC; S100A10-R: CTTTGCCATCTCTACACTGGTCC, QRT-PCR was performed following the manufacture’s protocol of the SYBR Green PCR kit (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). Real-Time PCR System was used to quantify the mRNA levels of S100A10 at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 34 s. ΔCt values were normalized to ACTB levels, and the relative expressions of mRNA to the control were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT.
Protein extraction and western blot
Proteins from frozen tissues and cells were extracted using RIPA buffer with 1% phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and PMSF. The lysates were collected following 30 min lysis on ice. Then the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) were used to detected proteins concentration. The process of western blotting analysis was performed as described previously [12]. 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS- onto the nitrocellulose (NC) membranes (PALL, CA, USA). The specific primary antibodies were used to incubate the membrane overnight at 4 °C. Subsequently, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody at 1:5000 dilution for 1 h at RT. The protein bands were observed with Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) Detection Kit(Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Image J software was used to analyze the relative levels of proteins.
Cell counting Kit-8 (CCK-8)
For CCK8 assays, cells were seeded into 96-well cell culture tissue at 3000 cell/well. According to the instruction, 10 µl of CCK-8 solution diluted in 100 µl of culture medium replaced the original medium at different time (24, 48, 72, and 96 h) incubating for 1 ~ 2 h. The absorbance was measured by Microplate Reader at a 450-nm wavelength.
Tumor xenograft assay
Male BALB/c nude mice at 6–8 weeks were obtained from the Shanghai Laboratory Animal Center (Shanghai, China). The animals were housed in standard conditions with light controlled conditions (12-h light/12-h dark cycle) and laboratory food and water ad libitum. Animals were adapted to the environment for 1 week before experiment. The experimental procedures were approved by Hunan Normal University and performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. HepG2 and SNU449 cells (2 × 106 cells/mice) were implanted subcutaneously into the flank of nude mice. After tumor formation, tumor volume (mm3) was measured every other day. When the tumors had reached a volume of approximately 600 mm3, the mice were euthanized, and the tumors were excised.
Flow cytometry
Cell apoptosis was assayed by Flow cytometry using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, cells were collected and simultaneously stained with FITC-Annexin V (green) and the nonvital dye PI (red), which allowed the discrimination of intact cells (FITC-/PI-), early-to mid-apoptotic (FITC+/PI-) and late apoptotic or necrotic cells (FITC+/PI+).
Statistical analysis
SPSS 20.0 (SPSS, USA) was used for statistical analysis, and the quantitative data were usually expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of gene expression in tissue array. Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s test were used to analyze the differences in S100A10 expression between clinical variables. Logrank test was used to analyze prognostic effects. Other data were compared by student’s t test or Mann Whitney test. Two-tails of P value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Result
The expression of S100A is higher in some tumor tissues than the corresponding normal tissues
We analyzed the expression of S100A mRNA in HCC tissues and corresponding normal tissues using TCGA database. Meanwhile, the expression of S100A protein in liver cancer tissues and adjacent tissues from CPTAC database. From TCGA database, we collected a total of 424 samples, including RNA sequencing data and detailed clinical prognosis information resources of 374 hepatocellular carcinoma specimens and 50 normal tissue specimens. We found that the expression levels of S100A4, S100A6, S100A10, S100A11, S100A13 and S100A16 in HCC and corresponding normal tissues were high, and the expression levels in tumors were higher than those in normal tissues (Fig. 1A). Further analysis showed that S100A4, S100A6, S100A10, S100A11,S100A13and S100A16 were highly expressed in most tumors (Fig. 1B-G). The expression of S100A members was positively correlated in tumors (Fig. 2A). Meaningful S100A members were screened out by analyzing the mRNA expression level. In order to further understand the protein expression level, we analyzed S100A4, S100A6, S100A10, S100A11, S100A13 and S100A16 through CPTAC database (Fig. 2B-F). The final results showed that there was no significant difference in the expression of S100A4, S100A11, S100A13 and S100A16 between HCC and normal tissues (P > 0.1) (Fig. 2B-G). The expression of S100A10 proteins in HCC was significantly higher than that in normal tissues (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2D). However, the expression of S100A6 protein in tumors was lower than that in normal tissues (Fig. 2C). S100A6 mRNA expression is higher in tumors, but S100A6 protein expression is lower in tumors, which may be involved in many regulatory mechanisms. According to the above analysis, only mRNA and protein of S100A10 were expressed at a high level in both tumor and normal tissues of HCC, and the expression in tumor tissues was higher than that in normal tissues. Therefore, the next study focused on S100A10. In order to further investigate the expression of S100A10 in HCC, we analyzed the expression of S100A10 in different HCC stages by using TCGA database, although the expression of S100A10 in HCC tumor tissues was higher than that in normal tissues. Interestingly, there was no significant correlation between the expression level of S100A10 and TNM stage, Pathological stage, Histologic grade, child-pugh grade and AFP of HCC (Fig. 3A-H). To verify the reliability of data sources, tumor tissues and para cancer tissues of 40 HCC patients were collected in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital. Among them, 39 patients showed high expression levels of S100A10 protein in tumor tissues, and 40 patients showed low expression levels of S100A10 protein in para cancer tissues (Fig. 3I). Subsequently, qRT-PCR was used to detect the expression level of S100A10 mRNA in tumor tissues and para cancer tissues of these 40 patients. Similarly, expression of S100A10 mRNA in tumor tissues was significantly higher than that in para cancer tissues (P < 0.01) (Fig. 3J). The consistent results were obtained by detecting the protein expression level of S100A10 by Western Blot (Fig. 3K). In conclusion, we could basically conclude that S100A10 mRNA and protein are highly expressed in HCC.
S100A10 has good diagnostic sensitivity in HCC
In this study, we assessed the diagnostic value of S100A10 in HCC by making ROC curves from the TCGA database. The results showed that the area under the curve (AUG) of S100A10 was 0.890 (Fig. 4A), and the diagnostic performance of S100A10 was better than that of AFP. In addition, we also analyzed the diagnostic value of S100A10 in different HCC stages. The results showed S100A10 AUG = 0.665 at 1 year of tumor progression (Fig. 4B), S100A10 AUG = 0.569 at 3 years of tumor progression (Fig. 4C), and S100A10 AUG = 0.615 at 5 years of tumor progression (Fig. 4D), S100A10 AUG = 0.879 at T1 and T2 stage (Fig. 4E), S100A10 AUG = 0.888 at T3 and T4 stage (Fig. 4F), S100A10 AUG = 0.868 at G1 and G2 stage (Fig. 4G), S100A10 AUG = 0.903 at G3 and G4 (Fig. 4H). All of these data supported that the sensitivity of S100A10 for the diagnosis of HCC is no less than that of AFP.
The high expression of S100A is associated with poor prognosis
According to the RNA sequencing data of HCC in TCGA database, they were divided into two groups: S100A10 low expression group (n = 187) and S100A10 high expression group (n = 187). The clinical data were grouped according to the following information: tumor status, T stage, N stage, M stage, pathological stage, historical grade, Child-Pugh grade, AFP, race, age, adjacent pathological tissue information, vascular invasion and OS event, and the above information was listed in Table 1.
Moreover, we drew the KM survival curve based on the data of GEPIA2.0 website, and found that the overall survival (OS) of the group with high S100A10 mRNA expression in CESC, HNSC, LGG, LIHC, LUAD and PAAD was lower than that of the group with low S100A10 mRNA expression (Fig. 5A). We further obtained HCC survival curves related to S100A10 through Kaplan Meier plotter website, and the results were consistent with TCGA results (OS (e = 0.0012), DSS(e = 0.024), PFI(P = 0.0034)) (Fig. 5B-D). Subsequently, we obtained the same result through TCGA database analysis. OS (P = 0.002), DSS (P = 0.022), PFI (P = 0.006)) (Fig. 5E-G). It has been confirmed in multiple databases that high expression level of S100A10 is associated with poor prognosis of HCC. We hypothesized that the prognostic correlation was related to the level of immune cell infiltration.
S100A is related to tumor immune cell infiltration and immune microenvironment
It is well known that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) influence the development of human tumors and affect the survival time of cancer patients. we used many algorithms to evaluate the relationship between S100A10 expression and the immune cells including CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells and regulatory T cells infiltration in various tumors (Fig. 6A). the results showed that S100A10 was related to tumor immune cell infiltration in many types of cancers including HCC. Next, we used the TIMER database to analyze the correlation between the expression of S100A10 and tumor purity and the infiltration of CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells, B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages and neutrophils. The results showed that the high expression of s100a10 was significantly positively correlated with the high infiltration of the above six immune cells. Among them, it was correlated with B cell (COR = 0.217, P < 0.001), CD8 + T cell (COR = 0.177, P < 0.001), CD4 + T cell (COR = 0.226, e < 0.001), macrophage (COR = 0.296, P < 0.001), neutrophil (COR = 0.254, P < 0.001), dendritic cell (COR = 0.252, P < 0.001). There was a similar correlation with tumor purity (COR = 0.155, P < 0.001) (Fig. 6B). In order to further study the infiltration of various immune cells in HCC tissues, we obtained from TCGA database that Th2 cells, T helper cells, TFH, ADC, NK CD56 bright cells, macrophages, T cells, etc. have a high correlation between immune infiltration and S100As expression. Among them, the infiltration level of Th2 cells was positively correlated with the expression level of S100A10 mRNA, while the infiltration level of CD8 + T cells was negatively correlated with the expression level of S100A10 mRNA. (Fig. 6C).
Network enrichment analysis identifies S100A10 functions, associated signaling pathways and genes
S100A10 activated two pathways: reaction signaling by Rho GTPases and reactome M phase (Fig. 7A, B). GO and KEGG analysis showed 3 signal pathways (BP), 3 cell components (CC), 3 biological processes (MF), and 2 KEGG respectively. We found that S100A10 was involved in the lipase inhibitor activity, S100 protein binding, phospholipase inhibitor activity, collagen-containing extracellular matrix, an extrinsic component of membrane, extrinsic component of the plasma membrane, regulation of response to wounding, regulation of wound healing and fibrinolysis, .etc by GO analysis. While, KEGG analysis showed that S100A10 was involved in complement and coagulation cascades and salmonella infection (Fig. 7C, D).
Protein interactions coordinate various biological functions, and the study of protein interactions is crucial for understanding the molecular mechanisms of biological processes and pathophysiology [19]17](Yang et al., 2017)(Yang, et al., 2017) [17][Yang et al., 2017][Yang et al., 2017]17 [17](Yang et al., 2017) [17] [17]. In order to explore the interaction between proteins in HCC, we obtained the interaction network diagram between proteins related to S100A10 from the STRING website (Fig. 7E). Among them, there is a strong correlation between ANXA1, ANXA2 genes and the expression level of S100A10. (Fig. 7F, G). In addition, the TOP 50 genes positively and negatively correlated with s100aF gene expression were also exhibited by the heat map (Fig. 7H, I). Next, we identify the S100A10 associated signaling pathways and genes in L02 cell lines (use knock out; showed in WB.) All the results provided new information for the in-depth understanding of S100A.
Inhibiting S100A10 reduces the proliferation, invasion and migration of HCC cells and promotes apoptosis
To further verify the biological functions of S100A10, we examined the expression levels of S100A10 mRNA and protein in hepatocytes (L02) and hepatoma cells (HepG2, Huh7, LM3, SNU449) (Fig. 8A, B). In hepatocellular carcinoma cells, S100A10 expression was lowest in HepG2 and highest in SNU449. Therefore, we established HepG2 cells that stably overexpressed S100A10 (ov-S100A10) and SNU449 cells that stably silence expressed S100A10(si-S100A10) (Fig. 8C-F). By CCK8 assay we found that the cell viability was higher for ov-S100A10 and lower for si-S100A10(Fig. 9A, B). Overexpression of S100A10 reduced apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells, while silencing of S100A10 increased apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Fig. 9C, D). To further explore the role of S100A10 in vivo, we grew HepG2 cells with ov-S100A10 and SNU449 cells with si-S100A10 subcutaneously in nude mice. On the premise of successful tumor formation, tumor volume was observed every three days for 21 days. No matter HepG2 or SNU449, the growth rate of the tumor was positively correlated with the expression level of S100A10 (Fig. 9E, F). S100A10 regulates apoptosis and viability of hepatocellular carcinoma cells probably associated with ANXA2/Akt/mTOR pathway [15, 20,21,22]. We found that the expression level of S100A10 was positively correlated with the phosphorylation levels of ANXA2, Akt, and mTOR by Western Blot (Fig. 9G). In summary, we basically concluded that S100A10 was involved in the growth process of hepatocellular carcinoma through the ANXA2/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.
Discussion
HCC ranks third in cancer-related death worldwide owing to its high incidence and linked mortality [23]. Although advances in the knowledge of HCC biology and therapy, the fatality if this disease is still high. Evidences indicated that the precise identification and differential diagnosis of early HCC can significantly increase the survival of patients. In the present study, we comprehensively analyzed the role of S100As in HCC including expression, mutation, prognostic value and immune cells infiltration.S100As proteins, small calcium-binding dimeric proteins, were originally shown to be found in vertebrates exclusively. S100As proteins, encoded by S100As genes which are located on chromosome 1q21 in humans in the district of the epidermal differentiation complex, are high structural homology and pleiotropic function [7]. According to reports, it ultimately leads to apoptosis, glycogen phosphorylation, phagocyte recruitment, and so on through involving in the activation of particular biochemical ways [24, 25]. The S100A family members have been demonstrated to play an important role in the interaction between tumor cells and their micro-environment, even involving the process of malignant tumor metastasis [26, 27]. Many studies have shown that S100A10 is involved in the occurrence and development of ovarian, lung, colorectal and pancreatic cancers [10, 13, 22, 28,29,30]. Even with evidence that S100As have been confirmed to be associated with the development of many digestive cancers, distinct roles of S100As in HCC remained to be investigated. Furthermore, the function of S100A10 and related mechanisms were verified by the experimental analysis.
The TCGA database was applied to analyze the differences between expression of S100As in LIHC samples and normal samples. We learned that mRNA expression levels of S100A4, S100A6, S100A10, S100A11 and S100A16 were higher in HCC than in normal tissues. It Studies have shown that multiple members of the S100As are abnormally expressed in tumors and are widely involved in processes related to tumorigenesis and progression [22, 23]. In order to indicated the role of the family members in HCC development, we further analyzed the expression of S100A4, S100A6, S100A10, S100A11 and S100A16 in pan-cancer, and the results suggested that they were highly expressed in most tumors. Furthermore, their protein expression was analyzed by the CTPAC database, and only S100A6 and S100A10 protein expression was different, and S100A6 protein expression was lower in tumors than in normal tissues, the protein expression level of S100A10 in HCC was higher than that of normal tissues. Our results illustrated that the mRNA expression of S100A6 and protein expression of S100A6 were inconsistent. The expression of mRNA does not necessarily have a linear relation to its translation product-protein expression, because there are several levels of regulation of gene expression, and the regulation of transcription level is only one connection, and post-transcriptional regulation and translation and post-translational regulation are all related to the expression of the final protein. There are many factors that may cause the expression levels of mRNA and protein to be inconsistent, including mRNA degradation, protein degradation, modified folding and so on. This may be caused by the rapid degradation of mRNA expression of S1006 in LIHC tissues, or the slow degradation of protein expression of S1006. Although some reports also evidenced that S100A10 participated in the development of ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and gastric cancer via different pathways, the mechanism for the function of S100A10 has not been clarified. We further analyzed the role and underlying mechanism of S100A10 in the development of HCC [31].
Using a large amount of data from multiple public databases, we concluded that high expression of S100A10 is associated with a poor prognosis of HCC. This conclusion may be related to immune cell infiltration. Early in 1985, Virchow had put forward this point of view [32]. Early in the initial stage, the inflammatory cells in different types of human tumors are powerful tumor promoters33 [2]. As cancers develop, the presence of proliferating inflammatory cells plays an important role in tumor cell migration, invasion and poor clinical outcomes [32, 33]. The S100A10 was related to the most infiltration status of immunocytes. In addition, through functional enrichment analysis, we found that S100A10 activates reaction signaling by Rho GTPases and Reactome M phase signal pathways and participates in biological functions such as complement and coagulation cascades and salmonella infection.We used TIMER to study the potential relationship between different immune cell infiltration levels and S100A10 in LIHC. This results was similar to these previous studies, suggesting that the S100A10 may be a potential target for the immunotherapy of HCC. However, the specific mechanism should be further investigated.
A large number of studies have shown that ANXA2 is involved in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma and plays an important role in its growth, and high expression of ANXA2 is negatively correlated with the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma [34,35,36]. ANXA2 interacts with S100A10 in gastric cancer to activate the mTOR pathway and inhibit apoptosis in gastric cancer cells [15]. To further explore the biological function of S100A10 in HCC. We speculate that S100A10 and ANXA2 may also activate the Akt/mTOR pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Finally, we come to the conclusion that the expression level of S100A10 was positively correlated with the phosphorylation levels of ANXA2, Akt, and mTOR. Nevertheless, some limitations in our study should be recognized. In the further research, we will combine the public databases and HCC cohorts to study the function of S100As in HCC.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.
Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):7.
Corrigendum to “EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma” [J Hepatol 69. (2018) 182–236]. J Hepatol 2019, 70(4):817.
Kishi Y, Hasegawa K, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N. Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and future development-improved outcomes with surgical resection. Int J Hepatol. 2011;2011:728103.
Roxburgh P, Evans TRJ. Systemic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: are we making progress? Adv Ther. 2008;25(11):1089–104.
Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1301–14.
Schäfer BW, Heizmann CW. The S100 family of EF-hand calcium-binding proteins: functions and pathology. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996;21(4):134–40.
Shiota M, Tsunoda T, Song Y, Yokomizo A, Tada Y, Oda Y, Naito S. Enhanced S100 calcium-binding protein P expression sensitizes human bladder cancer cells to cisplatin. BJU Int. 2011;107(7):1148–53.
Emberley ED, Murphy LC, Watson PH. S100 proteins and their influence on pro-survival pathways in cancer. Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;82(4):508–15.
Zhuang H, Chen X, Dong F, Zhang Z, Zhou Z, Ma Z, Huang S, Chen B, Zhang C, Hou B. Prognostic values and immune suppression of the S100A family in pancreatic cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(6):3006–18.
Zhao W, Han H-B, Zhang Z-Q. Suppression of lung cancer cell invasion and metastasis by connexin43 involves the secretion of follistatin-like 1 mediated via histone acetylation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43(10):1459–68.
Chen Y, Wang C, Song J, Xu R, Ruze R, Zhao Y. S100A2 is a prognostic biomarker involved in Immune Infiltration and Predict Immunotherapy Response in Pancreatic Cancer. Front Immunol. 2021;12:758004.
Bydoun M, Sterea A, Liptay H, Uzans A, Huang W-Y, Rodrigues GJ, Weaver ICG, Gu H, Waisman DM. S100A10, a novel biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2018;12(11):1895–916.
Huang S, Zheng J, Huang Y, Song L, Yin Y, Ou D, He S, Chen X, Ouyang X. Impact of S100A4 Expression on Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Dis Markers 2016, 2016:8137378.
Diklić M, Mitrović-Ajtić O, Subotički T, Djikić D, Kovačić M, Bjelica S, Beleslin-Čokić B, Tošić M, Leković D, Gotić M, et al. IL6 inhibition of inflammatory S100A8/9 proteins is NF-κB mediated in essential thrombocythemia. Cell Biochem Funct. 2020;38(4):362–72.
Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Ishiguro-Watanabe M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D587–92.
Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.
Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28(11):1947–51.
Yang B, Tang S, Ma C, Li S-T, Shao G-C, Dang B, DeGrado WF, Dong M-Q, Wang PG, Ding S, et al. Spontaneous and specific chemical cross-linking in live cells to capture and identify protein interactions. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):2240.
Zheng S, Liu L, Xue T, Jing C, Xu X, Wu Y, Wang M, Xie X, Zhang B. Comprehensive Analysis of the prognosis and correlations with Immune Infiltration of S100 protein family members in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Genet. 2021;12:648156.
Li Y, Li X-Y, Li L-X, Zhou R-C, Sikong Y, Gu X, Jin B-Y, Li B, Li Y-Q, Zuo X-L. S100A10 accelerates aerobic glycolysis and malignant growth by activating mTOR-Signaling pathway in gastric Cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:559486.
Bharadwaj AG, Kempster E, Waisman DM. The ANXA2/S100A10 complex-regulation of the oncogenic plasminogen receptor. Biomolecules 2021, 11(12).
Tekupalli R, Anand S, Ramachandregowda S, Kariyappa AS, Vadde R. Biomarkers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-An updated review. Crit Rev Oncog. 2021;26(1):11–20.
Santamaria-Kisiel L, Rintala-Dempsey AC, Shaw GS. Calcium-dependent and -independent interactions of the S100 protein family. Biochem J. 2006;396(2):201–14.
Fritz G, Botelho HM, Morozova-Roche LA, Gomes CM. Natural and amyloid self-assembly of S100 proteins: structural basis of functional diversity. FEBS J. 2010;277(22):4578–90.
Allgöwer C, Kretz A-L, von Karstedt S, Wittau M, Henne-Bruns D, Lemke J. Friend or foe: S100 proteins in Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020, 12(8).
Salama I, Malone PS, Mihaimeed F, Jones JL. A review of the S100 proteins in cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(4):357–64.
Sato K, Saiki Y, Arai K, Ishizawa K, Fukushige S, Aoki K, Abe J, Takahashi S, Sato I, Sakurada A, et al. S100A10 upregulation associates with poor prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;505(2):466–70.
Noye TM, Lokman NA, Oehler MK, Ricciardelli C. S100A10 and Cancer hallmarks: structure, functions, and its emerging role in Ovarian Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2018, 19(12).
Liu G, Fei F, Qu J, Wang X, Zhao Y, Li Y, Zhang S. iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis of DMH-induced colorectal cancer in mice reveals the expressions of β-catenin, decorin, septin-7, and S100A10 expression in 53 cases of human hereditary polyposis colorectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019;21(2):220–31.
Yanagi H, Watanabe T, Nishimura T, Hayashi T, Kono S, Tsuchida H, Hirata M, Kijima Y, Takao S, Okada S, et al. Upregulation of S100A10 in metastasized breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Sci. 2020;111(12):4359–70.
Condeelis J, Pollard JW. Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell. 2006;124(2):263–6.
Lukanidin E, Sleeman JP. Building the niche: the role of the S100 proteins in metastatic growth. Semin Cancer Biol. 2012;22(3):216–25.
Shi H, Xiao L, Duan W, He H, Ma L, Da M, Duan Y, Wang Q, Wu H, Song X, et al. ANXA2 enhances the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma via remodeling the cell motility associated structures. Micron. 2016;85:26–33.
Yan X, Zhang D, Wu W, Wu S, Qian J, Hao Y, Yan F, Zhu P, Wu J, Huang G, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells promote Hepatocarcinogenesis via lncRNA-MUF Interaction with ANXA2 and miR-34a. Cancer Res. 2017;77(23):6704–16.
Lou Y, Yu Y, Xu X, Zhou S, Shen H, Fan T, Wu D, Yin J, Li G. Long non-coding RNA LUCAT1 promotes tumourigenesis by inhibiting ANXA2 phosphorylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(3):1873–84.
Acknowledgements
No.
Funding
This work was financially supported by following funds: National Natural Science Foundation of China (81803272),China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M68115/2021T140197);Youth Talent of Hunan (2020RC3066) ; Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2020JJ5610, 2020JJ5385); Natural Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars of Hunan Province (2021JJ20003) ; Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission(202104010997, 202212045173);Chen Xiao-Ping Foundation for Development of Science and Technology of Hubei Province(CXPJJH12000001-2020322);innovative program of Hunan Normal University School of Medicine (KF2022004); The Project of Improving the Diagnosis and Treatment Capacity of Hepatobiliary, Pancreas and Intestine in Hunan Province (Xiangwei [2019] No. 118).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yuchen Qi, Yujing Zhang performed the data; Yinghui Song, Mengting Cai, Yuchen Qi and contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation; Xu Chen, Bo zhang, Junkai Huang, Zhangtao Yu and Yuhang Li performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; Jianwen Li and Sulai Liu contributed to the conception of the study; Jianwen Li, Yinghui Song and Sulai Liu helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The experimental procedures were approved by Hunan Normal University and performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The approval from the ethics Committee of Hunan Normal University is provided in the supplementary material. This study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines. Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Qi, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, J. et al. S100A family is a group of immune markers associated with poor prognosis and immune cell infiltration in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 23, 637 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11127-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11127-3