Skip to main content
Download PDF

Safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma: a nation-wide post-marketing surveillance

BMC Cancer volume 23, Article number: 565 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study was conducted to identify factors associated with the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma and to confirm the real-world safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients.

Methods

This multicenter, observational, post-marketing surveillance was conducted over a 1-year observation period starting at pembrolizumab initiation (200-mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks); data were collected from case report forms (3 months and 1 year). Safety measures included treatment-related adverse events and adverse events of special interest (AEOSI). Effectiveness assessments included tumor response, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

Overall, 1293 patients were evaluated for safety and 1136 for effectiveness. At 12 months, the treatment-related adverse event incidence was 53.8% (n = 696) and that of AEOSI was 25.0% (n = 323). The most frequent AEOSI of any grade were endocrinological disorder (10.4%, n = 134), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (7.2%, n = 93), and hepatic function disorder (4.9%, n = 64). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the risk of developing ILD was almost seven times greater (odds ratio 6.60) in patients with a comorbidity of ILD, and approximately twice as high in patients aged ≥ 65 years (odds ratio 2.24) and with smoking history (odds ratio 1.79). The ORR was 26.1% and the DCR was 50.7%. The ORR was 46.4% in patients with a Bellmunt risk score of 0 and decreased as the Bellmunt risk score increased.

Conclusions

This post-marketing surveillance confirmed the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma in the real-world setting.

Peer Review reports

Background

Urothelial carcinoma can arise from the renal pelvis, ureter, bladder, and proximal urethra; it is the most common histologic subtype of bladder cancer, accounting for approximately 95% of bladder cancer cases [1]. Bladder cancer is the tenth most common cancer worldwide [2], and the thirteenth most common cancer in Japan [3]. The age-standardized incidence and mortality rate is 5.6 and 1.9 per 100,000, respectively, worldwide and 7.2 and 2.1 per 100,000, respectively, in Japan [2, 4]. It is more common in men than in women, with a worldwide age-standardized incidence rate of 9.5 versus 2.4 per 100,000, respectively, and 12.6 versus 2.8 per 100,000, respectively, in Japan [2, 4]. Approximately 20% of patients presenting with invasive urothelial cancer have metastatic or unresectable disease [5]. The gold-standard first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is platinum-based combination chemotherapy (gemcitabine with cisplatin or carboplatin) or methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and platinum monotherapy [6,7,8,9]. Both atezolizumab and pembrolizumab are approved to treat patients who are ineligible for cisplatin-containing therapy in some countries [10]. There is currently no internationally accepted standard second-line treatment; globally, single-agent paclitaxel and docetaxel are commonly used, and vinflu-nine has been approved in Europe [11,12,13,14].

Pembrolizumab is an IgG4 anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) humanized antibody that binds to PD-1 and blocks the binding of PD-1 to its ligands, programmed death ligand 1 and programmed death ligand 2 [15]. It was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor that significantly improved overall survival while showing improved tolerability compared with chemotherapy when administered as second-line therapy for patients with platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma in the open-label, international, phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial [16]. Pembrolizumab was approved in Japan in December 2017 to treat patients with radically unresectable urothelial carcinoma who progressed after cancer chemotherapy [17]. The safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab for the treatment of these patients has been shown in clinical studies [16, 18, 19]. Although a large retrospective study was conducted recently [18], the real-world clinical safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab for this indication is not yet fully confirmed.

This nation-wide, all-case, post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was conducted at the request of Japanese regulatory authorities as a condition of the approval of pembrolizumab. During this study period, pembrolizumab was the only immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for second-line treatment in Japan, where no immune checkpoint inhibitor has been used for first-line treatment. Given the limited number of Japanese patients in the clinical trials leading up to the approval of pembrolizumab, the safety of this drug in the real-world setting was considered unconfirmed. Safety data for pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with lung cancer have been accumulating since approval; however, such data in patients with other cancer types are lacking and currently limited to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [20] and melanoma [21]. This PMS aimed to identify factors associated with the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma and to confirm the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in the real-world clinical setting by collecting data from a large number (> 1000) of Japanese patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Methods

Study design and treatment

This multicenter, observational, all-case PMS had a 1-year observation period from the start of treatment with pembrolizumab or 30 days after the last pembrolizumab dose for patients with an adverse event (AE). Pembrolizumab monotherapy was initiated at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks. Patients from 455 medical institutions were enrolled from 25 December 2017 to 20 April 2018. The survey period ended on 20 April 2020. The data cut-off was 3 March 2021.

This was a company-initiated study, and all data handling was carried out by authors affiliated with the company. This PMS conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and was conducted based on the Good Post-Marketing Study Practice authorized by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (Ordinance No. 171, 2004). The ordinance exempts the requirement of ethical review and patients’ informed consent in PMS.

Patients

All Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma who had progressed after at least one regimen of chemotherapy and who had started pembrolizumab monotherapy by 20 April 2018 were included. Only data from patients who were treated at institutions that permitted the use of patient data for this study were included.

Safety assessment

Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were defined as any AE in which a causal relationship to the drug could not be ruled out, including those for which a causal relationship was unknown or unreported. AEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 23.1, and graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. AEs of special interest (AEOSI) were defined in accordance with the Japanese Risk Management Plan and included the following: interstitial lung disease (ILD; in patients with pre-existing ILD, onset of pembrolizumab-induced ILD included the worsening or recurrence of ILD within the observation period), colitis/severe diarrhea, hepatic function disorder, renal function disorder (e.g., tubulointerstitial nephritis), endocrinological disorder (e.g., pituitary function disorder, thyroid function disorder, adrenal function disorder), type 1 diabetes mellitus, uveitis, myositis/rhabdomyolysis, pancreatitis, nerve disorders (e.g., Guillain–Barré syndrome), severe skin disorder (e.g., oculomucocutaneous syndrome, erythema multiforme, pemphigoid), encephalitis/meningitis, myasthenia gravis, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, hemolytic anemia, pure red cell aplasia, infusion reaction, and pembrolizumab administration in patients with organ transplant history including a medical history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (listed in the Japanese Risk Management Plan as an important identified risk) [22].

Effectiveness assessment

Tumor response observed during treatment with pembrolizumab was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of patients with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the proportion of patients with CR, PR, and stable disease (SD).

Statistical methods

The target sample size was 500 patients. In the KEYNOTE-045 study, the incidences of hepatic dysfunction, thyroid dysfunction, renal dysfunction, ILD, and colitis/severe diarrhea were 13.2%, 9.4%, 7.1%, 4.1%, and 3.4%, respectively. Assuming an equivalent post-marketing incidence rate, the number of patients necessary to obtain 1% or greater incidence of AEs, including those mentioned above, with 99% confidence was calculated to be 500.

Analysis populations included the safety analysis set and effectiveness analysis set (see Additional file 1). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized as mean ± standard deviation for categorical variables and median (range) for continuous variables. Safety data are summarized as the number and percentage of patients experiencing a TRAE or AEOSI. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to obtain the odds ratio and two-sided 95% confidence interval, with the presence or absence of AEs as the objective variable and background and treatment factors as explanatory variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out based on the univariate analysis results. These analyses were conducted to identify background characteristics associated with developing ILD (univariate and multivariate) and hepatic function disorder (univariate). To identify factors associated with the effectiveness of pembrolizumab, the ORR was summarized according to patient subgroups based on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Missing values were excluded from the analysis. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute; Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Patients

A total of 1320 patients were registered by 20 April 2018, and case report forms were collected from 1302 patients. The safety analysis set included 1293 patients, and the effectiveness analysis set included 1136 patients (see Additional file 2).

The median (range) treatment and observation periods were 13.1 (0.1–52.1) and 18.7 (0.1–92.7) weeks, respectively. At 12 months, 79.5% of patients (1028/1293) had discontinued treatment, 20.3% (263/1293) continued treatment, and 0.2% (2/1293) had an unknown treatment status. Among patients who discontinued treatment, the reasons for discontinuation were disease progression, 53.4% (549/1028); death, 26.8% (276/1028); AEs, 21.1% (217/1028); and other, 6.8% (70/1028), where the events of disease progression, death, and AEs recorded in any one patient were counted separately.

Patient baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Among the 1293 patients in the safety analysis set, the median (range) age was 71 (35–92) years, and most patients were male (75.3%, n = 974) and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0–1 (87.2%, n = 1128). The proportions of patients with 2 and ≥ 3 prior chemotherapy regimens were 30.9% (n = 399) and 14.3% (n = 185), respectively. The proportions of patients with Bellmunt risk scores of 2 and 3–4 were 29.8% (n = 385) and 24.0% (n = 310), respectively.

Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (safety analysis set)
Full size table

Safety

The incidence of TRAEs and AEOSI at 3 months and 1 year is shown in Table 2. At 12 months, the incidence of TRAEs was 53.8% (n = 696) and that of AEOSI was 25.0% (n = 323). Grade 5 TRAEs occurred in 83 patients (6.4%), 47 (3.6%) of which were due to disease progression. Grade 5 AEOSI were reported in 1.4% (n = 18) of patients (Table 3). The most frequent lethal event was ILD, which occurred in 11 patients (0.9%). AEOSI by grade and time of occurrence are summarized in Fig. 1a. At 3 months and 12 months, the most frequent AEOSI of any grade were endocrinological disorder (10.4%, n = 134; Grade 3–5, 2.6%), ILD (7.2%, n = 93; Grade 3–5, 3.6%), hepatic function disorder (4.9%, n = 64; Grade 3–5, 2.5%), and colitis/severe diarrhea (any grade: 1.9% n = 25; Grade 3–5, 1.4%). A violin-plot of AEOSI onset is shown in Fig. 1b. Most AEOSI appeared within the first three dosing cycles (63 days), which was notable for hepatic and endocrine disorders. Both early- and late-onset (i.e., beyond 200 days) ILD occurred, which contrasted with the onset of the other AEOSIs, particularly for colitis/severe diarrhea, which that had few late-onset cases. The outcomes of AEOSI are summarized in Fig. 2. No deaths were reported among patients with endocrinological disorder, but some patients did not recover or recovered with sequelae. Among patients who received corticosteroids for the treatment of endocrine disorder, the dose of administered corticosteroid was low (median: 945 mg) and the treatment period was long (median: 138 days) (see Additional file 3). There were no patients with organ transplant history who received pembrolizumab in this surveillance.

Table 2 Incidence of TRAEs and AEOSI (safety analysis set)
Full size table
Table 3 Grade 5 AEOSI
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

AEOSI incidence at 3 and 12 months (a) and AEOSI onset occurring in ≥ 20 patients (b). AEOSI adverse event of special interest, M months

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Outcomes of adverse events of special interest. a“Unknown” does not include “death”

Full size image

As for clinical factors associated with AEOSI, univariate analysis showed that the risk of ILD was higher in the elderly (odds ratio 1.93 in those aged 65–75 years), male patients (odds ratio 2.11), and those with a history of smoking (odds ratio 2.39 in current smokers, 2.11 in former smokers), lung metastasis (odds ratio 1.78), and ILD as a comorbidity (odds ratio 8.15) (Fig. 3a). The risk of ILD was lower in patients with liver metastasis (odds ratio 0.37) (Fig. 3a). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the risk of developing ILD was almost seven times greater in patients with a comorbidity of ILD at baseline (odds ratio 6.60) and approximately twice as high in patients aged ≥ 65 years (odds ratio 2.24) and patients with smoking history (odds ratio 1.79) (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Background characteristics associated with the development of ILD by univariate (a) and multivariate (b) analysis. aLiver metastasis was not included in the multivariate analysis because the clinical relevance is uncertain. CI confidence interval, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, ILD interstitial lung disease, L line, M months

Full size image

Regarding other frequent AEOSI, univariate analysis showed that hepatic function disorder was less likely to occur in men (odds ratio 0.53). Endocrinological disorders were more likely to occur in patients with a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 (odds ratio 1.55) and less likely to occur in patients with hemoglobin < 10 g/dL (odds ratio 0.44) or ECOG PS ≥ 1 (odds ratio 0.60).

Effectiveness

In the effectiveness analysis set (n = 1136), the tumor response was CR in 64 patients (5.6%), PR in 233 patients (20.5%), SD in 279 patients (24.6%), and progressive disease in 560 patients (49.3%). The ORR was 26.1% and the DCR was 50.7%. The ORR by background patient characteristics is shown in Fig. 4. The ORR was 46.4% in patients with a Bellmunt risk score of 0 and decreased as the Bellmunt risk score increased. The ORR was relatively low in patients with characteristics including an ECOG PS of ≥ 2, liver metastases, and no prior surgery. ORRs in patients with and without AEOSI were 34.9% and 23.1%, respectively, and 36.9% in patients with Grade 1–2 AEOSI (Fig. 5). There was no notable difference in the ORR according to concomitant corticosteroid use (without concomitant corticosteroid use, 25.4% [215/848]; with concomitant corticosteroid use, 28.8% [82/285]).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot for ORR by background patient characteristics (effectiveness analysis set). CI confidence interval, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, ORR objective response rate

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot for ORR by AEOSI (effectiveness analysis set). AE adverse event, AEOSI adverse event of special interest, CI confidence interval, ORR objective response rate

Full size image

Discussion

Pembrolizumab is the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for the second-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma and is the only drug approved in Japan for second- or later-line treatment. Its efficacy and safety have been confirmed in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial [16]. However, it is important to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in actual clinical practice, where patients with different characteristics, including those with various complications and poor ECOG PS, are treated. The findings of this survey, which evaluated the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab as second-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in more than 1000 real-world patients, are of great significance. Of note, the original target sample size for this survey was 500 patients to detect AEOSI with a frequency of 1%, but more than 1300 patients were enrolled, exceeding our expectation. This all-case surveillance enrolled patients with various background characteristics: 12.8% of patients had an ECOG PS ≥ 2, which was higher than that reported in the KEYNOTE-045 trial (0.7%) [16], and 35.0% of patients had a low hemoglobin level (< 10 g/dL). The proportion of heavily treated patients (≥ 2 prior regimens) was higher than that in the KEYNOTE-045 trial (45.2% vs. 20.4%, respectively) [16]. However, the safety profile and AEOSI rates were comparable to that reported in the KEYNOTE-045 trial, and this finding is important because it is the first to demonstrate the safety of pembrolizumab in a large real-world data set.

No unknown safety concerns were raised in this PMS, and the AE profile was generally consistent with that of previous reports. The most frequent AEOSI was endocrine disorder, followed by ILD, hepatic function disorder, and colitis/severe diarrhea. Other AEOSIs were relatively infrequent, but some of them were serious (e.g., Grade 5 renal function disorder, encephalitis/meningitis, and myasthenia gravis). Although the frequency of renal function disorder was low (0.2%), many patients with urothelial cancer have poor renal function, and platinum-based agents often cause renal disorders.

As for the timing of AEOSI, most appeared within the first three dosing cycles (63 days), which was notable for hepatic and endocrine disorders, although the violin-plot revealed that both early-onset and late-onset ILD was observed. These findings suggest that when treating these patients, special attention should be paid to the potential development of AEOSI including rare ones, and constant patient monitoring is also needed from the start of treatment with pembrolizumab.

A previous PMS of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC reported that the most frequent AEOSI was ILD (any grade: 12.2%), followed by endocrine disorders (8.5%), liver dysfunction (5.2%), and colitis/severe diarrhea (2.4%) [20], while another PMS in patients with melanoma reported that the most frequent AEOSI were endocrine disorder (any grade: 9.9%), liver dysfunction (6.1%), ILD (5.1%), and colitis/severe diarrhea (3.1%) [21]. These trends of frequent AEOSI were similar to those observed in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, a previous study showed that there were some differences in the AE incidence among patients with various cancer types who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors [23]. The incidence of ILD in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (7.2%) was lower than that in patients with NSCLC, but was much higher than that in patients with melanoma. These differences of ILD incidence might be due to differences in smoking rates between the different study populations; the smoking rate was especially high in patients with NSCLC (77.8%). Other differences in AE incidence between the different cancer types may also be a result of differences in tumor/patient characteristics, so it would be meaningful to assess the safety of a single drug in patients with different tumor types.

We investigated risk factors associated with the three most frequent AEOSI (ILD, hepatic function disorder, and endocrine disorder). For hepatic function disorder and endocrine disorder, we could not find clinically meaningful risk factors. Age (≥ 65 years), smoking history, and ILD comorbidity were identified as risk factors for the development of ILD. In particular, ILD comorbidity was the strongest risk factor (odds ratio 6.60). A recent PMS of pembrolizumab in patients with NSCLC reported a higher likelihood of experiencing ILD onset or deterioration as an AE in the first-line setting with current/former smokers, those with a history of pre-existing ILD, and those with a history of or current neoplasms (except lung cancer) [20]. Therefore, special attention is necessary for such patients with smoking history or ILD comorbidity, regardless of the tumor type. Of note, liver metastasis was found to be associated with a lower risk of developing ILD in the univariate analysis. However, considering the uncertain clinical relevance of this finding, liver metastasis was not included in the multivariate analysis. This does not suggest that liver metastasis is a protective factor for ILD because liver metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for urothelial carcinoma. Most likely, the short treatment duration in patients with liver metastasis may reduce the onset of ILD.

The ORR of pembrolizumab was 26.1% (CR: 5.6%, PR: 20.5%) in this study, and this result is consistent with previous reports [16, 18, 19]. Bellmunt risk score (ECOG PS > 1, hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, duration from last dose < 3 months, and presence of liver metastasis) is a prognostic factor in conventional second-line treatment [24]. The results of this surveillance also showed that the ORR in patients with Bellmunt risk score 0 was the highest (46.4%) compared with patients with other Bellmunt risk scores and decreased as the Bellmunt risk scores increased. The ORR was > 30% in patients with ECOG PS ≤ 1 or no visceral metastasis. This is consistent with a previous study that investigated prognosis stratified by PS, hemoglobin, metastasis sites, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [25]. Several studies reported that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was also a predictor of pembrolizumab efficacy in urothelial carcinoma [25,26,27].

In a clinical study of pembrolizumab for urothelial carcinoma, patients with immune-related AEs (irAEs) had better outcomes than those without irAEs [28]. Although a relationship between AEOSI (i.e., immune-related AEs) and effectiveness cannot be confirmed, we found that the ORR tended to be better in patients with Grade 1–2 AEOSI than in patients without AEOSI. The timing of irAEs and assessment of effectiveness was not considered in this analysis, but it should be noted that patients with better outcomes tend to receive a longer course of treatment, which would increase the risk of irAE occurrence and may provide an explanation for this finding.

This study had several limitations. The duration of treatment and follow-up was limited. The patient population had a variable treatment history and there were some missing data. Moreover, safety and effectiveness were not centrally assessed, and the timing of the effectiveness evaluation was not specified in advance because this was an investigation of real-world effectiveness of pembrolizumab. Finally, this study evaluated only ORR as a measure of effectiveness. A recent real-world study of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma reported overall survival as a measure of effectiveness [29]. In that study, overall survival was longer in those treated with pembrolizumab versus those treated with conventional chemotherapy, regardless of their background characteristics.

Conclusions

In this PMS, the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab were confirmed in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma in the real-world setting and no new safety signal was raised. ILD was the most lethal event and age (≥ 65 years), smoking history, and ILD comorbidity were identified as risk factors for the development of ILD in patients treated with pembrolizumab.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets analyzed during this post-marketing surveillance are not available because data sharing with third parties is not permitted per the contract with all study sites or the patients. Please contact MSD K.K. (https://www.msd.co.jp) for inquiries about access to the data set used in this post-marketing surveillance.

Abbreviations

AE:

Adverse event

AEOSI:

Adverse event of special interest

CR:

Complete response

DCR:

Disease control rate

ECOG PS:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status

ILD:

Interstitial lung disease

irAEs:

Immune-related AEs

L:

Line

M:

Months

NSCLC:

Non-small-cell lung cancer

ORR:

Objective response rate

PD-1:

Programmed cell death protein 1

PMS:

Post-marketing surveillance

PR:

Partial response

SD:

Stable disease

TRAE:

Treatment-related adverse event

References

  1. Kobayashi T. Understanding the biology of urothelial cancer metastasis. Asian J Urol. 2016;3:211–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer. WHO. Bladder: Globocan 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/30-Bladder-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2022.

  3. Matsuda T, Okuyama A. Incidence rate for bladder cancer in Japanese in Japan and in the United States from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47:284–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Cancer Center. Cancer Statistics in Japan 2022. https://ganjoho.jp/public/qa_links/report/statistics/2022_en.html. Accessed 21 Apr 2022.

  5. Svatek RS, Siefker-Radtke A, Dinney CP. Management of metastatic urothelial cancer: the role of surgery as an adjunct to chemotherapy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3:S228–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. von der Maase H, Sengelov L, Roberts JT, Ricci S, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, et al. Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4602–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sternberg CN, de Mulder P, Schornagel JH, Theodore C, Fossa SD, van Oosterom AT, et al. Seven year update of an EORTC phase III trial of high-dose intensity M-VAC chemotherapy and G-CSF versus classic M-VAC in advanced urothelial tract tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:50–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saxman SB, Propert KJ, Einhorn LH, Crawford ED, Tannock I, Raghavan D, et al. Long-term follow-up of a phase III intergroup study of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2564–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bellmunt J, von der Maase H, Mead GM, Skoneczna I, De Santis M, Daugaard G, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing paclitaxel/cisplatin/gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer without prior systemic therapy: EORTC intergroup study 30987. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1107–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Suzman DL, Agrawal S, Ning YM, Maher VE, Fernandes LL, Karuri S, et al. FDA approval summary: atezolizumab or pembrolizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Oncologist. 2019;24:563–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oing C, Rink M, Oechsle K, Seidel C, von Amsberg G, Bokemeyer C. Second line chemotherapy for advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: vinflunine and beyond—a comprehensive review of the current literature. J Urol. 2016;195:254–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raggi D, Miceli R, Sonpavde G, Giannatempo P, Mariani L, Galsky MD, et al. Second-line single-agent versus doublet chemotherapy as salvage therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:49–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellmunt J, Théodore C, Demkov T, Komyakov B, Sengelov L, Daugaard G, et al. Phase III trial of vinflunine plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone after a platinum-containing regimen in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4454–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bellmunt J, Fougeray R, Rosenberg JE, von der Maase H, Schutz FA, Salhi Y, et al. Long-term survival results of a randomized phase III trial of vinflunine plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1466–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lopez-Beltran A, Cimadamore A, Blanca A, Massari F, Vau N, Scarpelli M, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of bladder cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Vaughn DJ, Fradet Y, Lee JL, Fong L, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1015–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuasa T, Urakami S, Yonese J. Recent advances in medical therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:599–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ito K, Kobayashi T, Kojima T, Hikami K, Yamada T, Ogawa K, et al. Pembrolizumab for treating advanced urothelial carcinoma in patients with impaired performance status: analysis of a Japanese nationwide cohort. Cancer Med. 2021;10:3188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nishiyama H, Yamamoto Y, Sassa N, Nishimura K, Fujimoto K, Fukasawa S, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer in Japanese patients: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25:165–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto N, Kamitani T, Kanda K, Ito Y, Hamada M, Ozaki M, et al. Real-world outcomes of pembrolizumab monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer in Japan: a post-marketing surveillance. Cancer Sci. 2022;113:3110–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamazaki N, Shimizu A, Ozaki M, Hamada M, Takeuchi N, Ito Y, et al. Real-world safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with radically unresectable melanoma: an all-case postmarketing surveillance in Japan. J Dermatol. 2022;49:1096–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. MSD K.K. Risk management plan for KeytrudaⓇ intravenous infusion 100 mg (in Japanese). https://www.pmda.go.jp/RMP/www/170050/bb2e759c-bd7f-4577-b27c-342a2524de1d/170050_4291435A1029_025RMP.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2023.

  23. Ma K, Lu Y, Jiang S, Tang J, Li X, Zhang Y. The relative risk and incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitors related pneumonitis in patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bellmunt J, Choueiri TK, Fougeray R, Schutz FA, Salhi Y, Winquist E, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1850–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kobayashi T, Ito K, Kojima T, Kato M, Kanda S, Hatakeyama S, et al. Risk stratification for the prognosis of patients with chemoresistant urothelial cancer treated with pembrolizumab. Cancer Sci. 2021;112:760–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fukata S, Mizutani K, Yamamoto S, Kuno T, Fukuhara H, Ashida S, et al. Sarcopenia and the rate of change of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as predictors of pembrolizumab efficacy in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Anticancer Drugs. 2022;33:459–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Uchimoto T, Nakamura K, Komura K, Fukuokaya W, Yano Y, Nishimura K, et al. Prognostic value of the fluctuation in the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at 6 weeks of pembrolizumab treatment is specific to the clinical response in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2022;40:344.e11–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kawai T, Taguchi S, Nakagawa T, Kamei J, Nakamura Y, Obinata D, et al. Impact of immune-related adverse events on the therapeutic efficacy of pembrolizumab in urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study using time-dependent analysis. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e003965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Miyake M, Nishimura N, Shimizu T, Ohnishi M, Kuwada M, Itami Y, et al. Significant improvement of prognosis after the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis on real-world data. Cancer Manag Res. 2022;14:623–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the patients and their families who participated in this surveillance, all physicians and coordinators who contributed to this surveillance, Professor Yamamoto for providing advice on the interpretation of the safety results, and CMIC Inc. for their support with the data analysis. The authors wish to thank Michelle Belanger, MD, and Sarah Bubeck, PhD, of Edanz, Japan, for providing medical writing support, which was funded by MSD K.K., Japan, through EMC K.K., Japan, in accordance with Good Publication Practice 2022 guidelines (http://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022).

Funding

This study was funded by MSD K.K., Tokyo, Japan. The funder had a role in the study design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and writing of the report and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan

    Hiroyuki Nishiyama

  2. Japan Pharmacovigilance, MSD K.K., Tokyo, 1-13-12 Kudan-kita, Chiyoda-ku, 102-8667, Japan

    Yu Tanaka, Masahiro Hamada, Masahiko Ozaki & Shinichiroh Maekawa

  3. Oncology Medical Affairs, MSD K.K., Tokyo, 1-13-12 Kudan-kita, Chiyoda-ku, 102-8667, Japan

    Toshihiko Minegishi & Yuichiro Ito

  4. Respiratory Medicine and Medical Oncology, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan

    Nobuyuki Yamamoto

Authors
  1. Hiroyuki Nishiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masahiro Hamada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masahiko Ozaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Toshihiko Minegishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuichiro Ito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shinichiroh Maekawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nobuyuki Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MH, MO, YI, and SM were involved in conception of the study; and MH, MO, and SM designed the study. YT, MH, MO, and SM were involved in the data acquisition; YT, MH, MO, TM, and SM analyzed the data; and HN, TM, YI, and NY interpreted the data. HN, YT, MH, MO, and TM drafted the initial manuscript; and HN, YI, SM, and NY critically revised the manuscript content. All authors approved the final manuscript and hold accountability for the accuracy and integrity of the data presented.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshihiko Minegishi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This post-marketing surveillance conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and was conducted based on the Good Post-Marketing Study Practice authorized by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (Ordinance No. 171, 2004). The ordinance exempts the requirement of ethical review and patients’ informed consent in post-marketing surveillance.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

HN has received all support for the present manuscript from MSD; grants or contracts from Ono Pharmaceutical, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, and Chugai Pharmaceutical through his own institution; consulting fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, and MSD; and payment or honoraria from Olympus, Astellas Pharma, Merck Biopharma, and MSD. YT was an employee of MSD at the time of the study. MH is an employee of MSD; and holds stock or stock options in Merck & Co., and Organon & Co. MO is an employee of MSD and holds stock or stock options in Merck & Co. TM is an employee of MSD and holds stock or stock options in Merck and GlaxoSmithKline. YI is an employee of MSD; and holds stock or stock options in Merck & Co., and Bayer AG. SM is an employee of MSD and holds stock or stock options in Merck. NY has received grants or contracts from MSD, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical., Pfizer, Amgen, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Toppan Printing, Terumo, and Boehringer-Ingelheim through his own institution; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Nippon Kayaku, Life Technologies Japan, Amgen, Guardant Health Japan, and Janssen Pharmaceutical; honoraria from MSD, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Nippon Kayaku, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical, and Merck Biopharma; and has participated in a data safety monitoring or advisory board for MSD, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Pfizer.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: 

Safety analysis set and effectiveness analysis set criteria.

Additional file 2: 

Patient disposition.

Additional file 3: 

Corticosteroid use for AEOSI.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishiyama, H., Tanaka, Y., Hamada, M. et al. Safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma: a nation-wide post-marketing surveillance. BMC Cancer 23, 565 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10930-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10930-2

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us