Skip to main content
Download PDF

The clinicopathological significance of thymic epithelial markers expression in thymoma and thymic carcinoma

BMC Cancer volume 23, Article number: 161 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The classification of thymomas is based on the morphology of epithelial tumor cells and the proportion of lymphocytes. Type A thymomas are composed of the spindle or oval tumor epithelial cells. Tumor cells of B thymomas are epithelioid-shaped with increasing atypia. Type AB thymomas have the features of epithelial tumor cells of A and B thymomas. The diagnosis can be difficult because of the complex morphology. Some novel thymic epithelial markers have been reported in several preclinical studies, but they have not been applied to clinical practice. Here, we investigated the expression of 3 cortical and 3 medullary markers, which are thymoproteasome-specific subunit β5t (β5t), thymus-specific serine protease 16 (PRSS16), cathepsin V, autoimmune regulator (AIRE), CD40 and claudin-4.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze 53 cases of thymomas and thymic squamous cell carcinomas (TSCC), aiming to explore the expression of cortical and medullary epithelial markers and their correlation with histological classification, Masaoka-Koga stage, and prognosis.

Results

Our results found that for cortical epithelial markers the expression of β5t, PRSS16, and cathepsin V was higher in type AB and B thymomas than in micronodular thymoma with lymphoid stroma (MNT), and we observed a dramatic increase of β5t and PRSS16 expression in type AB compared to type A thymomas. In medullary epithelial markers, the expression of AIRE was higher in type A than in B3 thymomas. CD40 and β5t expression were associated with the Masaoka-Koga stage. High cathepsin V expression was related to a good prognosis and a longer progression-free survival.

Conclusion

This is the first comprehensive analysis of the role of thymic cortical and medullary epithelial markers as biomarkers for differential diagnosis and prognosis in thymic tumors. Thymic medullary epithelial immunophenotype was found to exhibit in type A, MNT, and TSCC. Type B thymomas primarily exhibited a cortical epithelial immunophenotype. Type AB thymomas showed cortical, medullary, or mixed corticomedullary epithelial immunophenotype. Our results demonstrated that thymic cortical and medullary epithelial markers including β5t, PRSS16, cathepsin V, and AIRE could be used as ancillary markers in the diagnosis and prognosis of thymic epithelial tumors.

Peer Review reports

Background

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare tumors, including thymoma, thymic carcinoma, and thymic neuroendocrine tumors. Thymoma represents the most common TETs, with an annual incidence rate of 0.13–0.26 per 100,000 people [1].

The histopathologic classification of TETs is a controversial issue, and 24 histologic classifications of thymoma have been introduced in the past [2]. A previous study has divided thymoma into lymphocyte-predominant, epithelial-predominant, mixed (lymphoepithelial), and spindle cell thymoma [3]. In 1985, Marino and Muller-Hermelink divided thymic epithelial tumors into medullary, mixed medullary and cortical, predominantly cortical, and cortical thymoma, well-differentiated thymic carcinoma, and high-grade carcinoma [4]. Currently, the most widely used classification system for TETs is World Health Organization (WHO) classification. According to the atypia of the epithelial cells and the extent of the lymphocyte component, TETs are subclassified into type A, AB, B1, B2, B3 thymoma, metaplastic thymoma, micronodular thymoma with lymphoid stroma (MNT), thymic carcinoma, and thymic neuroendocrine tumors in the fifth edition of the WHO classification of thymic epithelial tumors [1]. Many reports have investigated the clinicopathologic relationship between WHO histologic classification of thymoma and prognosis. The WHO histological classification was shown to correlate with disease-free survival and recurrence by some studies [5,6,7], but the relationship between WHO classification and overall survival (OS) remains unclear [8, 9]. Moreover, because of the rarity and heterogeneous behaviors of thymomas, there have been arguments and controversies regarding the reproducibility of WHO classification [10,11,12].

It is difficult for pathologists to distinguish subtypes of TETs through histological features of epithelial cells and lymphocytes in some cases. Researchers have explored some markers to differentiate thymoma from thymic carcinoma, such as CD5, CD117, CD70, thymoproteasome-specific subunit β5t (β5t), Glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1), BRCA1 associated protein 1, methylthioadenosine phosphorylase, Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) and Ki-67 labeling index [13,14,15,16]. However, no one single biomarker can distinguish different thymomas effectively, hence a mix of antibodies is frequently used to aid the diagnosis. In thymoma, lymphocytes can be identified by CD3, CD5, CD20, CD1α, and TdT. Although CD20 can be expressed by some type A and AB thymoma epithelial cells, the generally used epithelial markers CK, CK5/6, p40, and p63 have limited utility in thymoma histological classification [17]. The fifth edition of the “WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumors” mentioned three thymic cortical and three medullary epithelial markers, which are β5t, Thymus-specific serine protease 16 (PRSS16), cathepsin V, autoimmune regulator (AIRE), CD40 and claudin-4, but no indication was given about their roles in histological classification [1]. Previous studies mainly focused on biological functions. β5t was mainly expressed in type B, and AB thymomas, and the expression of β5t correlated with the morphology of tumor cells and the number of TdT-positive lymphocytes [18,19,20,21]. Cathepsin V is mainly expressed in cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTECs), and its expression is increased in thymoma patients with myasthenia gravis [22]. PRSS16 is specifically expressed in the cTECs, correlates with the presentations of the self-peptides that are bound to MHC class II molecules, and is involved in the positive selection of CD4+ thymocytes [23]. AIRE expression is inherent to all medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs), and it can be expressed in different phases of differentiation [24]. In the final stage of maturation, mTECs lose AIRE expression accompanied by the formation of Hassall’s corpuscles [25]. CD40 is expressed in both mTECs and cTECs, mainly in mTECs, but Hassall’s corpuscles are stained very weakly [26]. Claudin-4 is found in the area surrounding Hassall’s corpuscles [27]. However, the role of thymic cortical and medullary epithelial markers in histological classification, Masaoka-Koga stage, and prognosis has hardly been studied so far.

In this study, we aimed to explore the expression of thymic cortical epithelial markers (β5t, PRSS16, and cathepsin V) and medullary epithelial markers (claudin-4, CD40, and AIRE) in thymoma and TSCC and its correlation with histological classification, staging, and prognosis.

Methods

Patients and specimens

We enrolled 53 patients diagnosed with thymoma or TSCC in the Department of Pathology, Second Hospital of Jilin University from December 2011 to May 2021, including 5 patients with type A thymoma, 5 with B1, 13 with B2, 5 with B3, 13 with AB, 5 with MNT, and 7 with TSCC, and all type A thymomas were classic and excluded atypical A thymoma. Tumor classification was based on the fifth WHO classification of Thoracic Tumors, and staging was performed using the Masaoka-Koga staging system. Follow-up data were recorded for 34 of 53 thymomas and TSCC. The mean follow-up period was 35.5 months (range 2–75 months). Among them, 3 patients died, 2 developed recurrences 2 and 45 months after the initial resection, and 1 showed metastasis to the right pleura 15 months postoperatively.

Immunohistochemical staining

Formalin-fixed paraffin sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in graded alcohol, and incubated in a 0.3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 30 min at room temperature to block endogenous peroxidase activity. For immunohistochemical analysis, the antibodies employed included β5t (rabbit polyclonal, 1:200, absin), PRSS16 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:500, cusabio), cathepsin V (rabbit polyclonal, 1:200, cusabio), claudin-4 (1:300, absin), CD40 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:300, cusabio), and AIRE (rabbit polyclonal, 1:200, absin). All procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The negative controls underwent the same procedures, and the primary antibody was replaced with PBS. Peritumor remnant thymus served as a positive control.

A semi-quantitative score was obtained by multiplying the grades for the extent (the percentage of positive tumor cells: 0–100%) and intensity (0 = negative, 1 = weak, 2 = intermediate, and 3 = strong) of the staining. The median was used as the cut-off value for distinguishing positive or negative. The quantity of positive cortical or medullary markers determines the immunophenotype of epithelial cells. Cortical epithelial immunophenotype was defined when the expression number of cortical antibodies exceeds the number of medullary antibodies and vice versa. It was thought to have a bidirectional corticomedullary immunophenotype when the number was equal. The case was defined as null immunophenotype if neither cortical nor medullary epithelial markers are expressed.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The results of the immunohistochemical analysis were evaluated by the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test. OS rates and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was assessed by the log-rank test. The correlation between the protein expression and histological classification was analyzed using Spearman’s correlation. A Venn illustration was used to show corticomedullary epithelial immunophenotype between type A, B, and AB thymomas [28]. All p values were based on two-sided statistical analysis, and p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Expression of cortical epithelial markers (β5t, PRSS16, and cathepsin V) in thymoma and TSCC

We stained 53 cases of thymoma and TSCC with 3 cortical markers (Table 1). β5t positivity was observed in the tumor cell nuclear in 76.9% (10/13) of type AB thymomas (Fig. 1A). In a few cases of AB thymomas with intricately intermingled type A component and type B-like component, positive β5t expression was detected in oval epithelial cells rather than spindle cells as in type A thymomas (Fig. 1A). β5t was positive in most type B thymomas (65.2%, 15/23), and its expression increased sequentially in B1-B3 thymomas. One case in type A and one case in TSCC was β5t positive, and β5t expression was observed in the plasma of tumor cells of type A thymoma (Fig. 1B).

Table 1 Expression of cortical and medullary markers in thymomas and TSCC
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Expression of cortical epithelial markers in thymoma and TSCC. (a) β5t in AB thymoma × 400; (b) β5t in A thymoma × 200; (c) PRSS16 in B1 thymoma × 200; (d) PRSS16 in B2 thymoma × 200; (e) Cathepsin V in AB thymoma × 200; (f) Cathepsin V in B1 thymoma × 100

Full size image

PRSS16 was expressed in 78.3% (18/23) of type B, and 61.5% (8/13) of type AB thymoma, not in MNT and type A thymoma, and rarely expressed in TSCC (28.6%, 2/7). Among type B thymomas, B2 thymoma (84.6%, 11/13) had the highest expression rate, followed by B1(80.0%, 4/5), and B3(60.0%, 3/5). PRSS16-positive epithelial cells were scattered in B1 thymoma (Fig. 1C), and a network of PRSS16-positive epithelial cells was seen in B2 (Fig. 1D) and B3 thymoma, which was consistent with the morphology of type B thymomas.

Cathepsin V expression was found in 69.6% (16/23) of type B, 69.2% (9/13) of type AB (Fig. 1E), 40.0% (2/5) of type A thymomas, and 28.6% (2/7) of TSCC, while MNT was not expressed. In type B thymoma, the expression of B2 (76.9%, 10/13) and B3 (80.0%, 4/5) thymoma was similar. The expression of cathepsin V in the medullary islands of B1 (Fig. 1F) was weaker than that in the cortex-like areas. Table 2 summarized the expression of cortical epithelial markers in the differential diagnosis. The expression of β5t, PRSS16, and cathepsin V was higher in type AB and B thymomas than in MNT (p < 0.05). Moreover, the expression of β5t and PRSS16 has significantly increased in type AB thymomas as compared with type A thymomas (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the rest groups (p > 0.05).

Table 2 Comparison of cortical and medullary markers expression in thymomas and TSCC
Full size table

Expression of medullary epithelial markers (claudin-4, CD40, and AIRE) in thymoma and TSCC

We stained 53 cases of thymoma and TSCC with 3 medullary markers (Table 1).

CD40 is expressed in all types of thymoma and TSCC. A total of 60.0% (3/5) of type A, 61.5% (8/13) of type AB, 56.5% (13/23) of type B, 40.0% (2/5) of MNT, and 57.1% (4/7) of TSCC were CD40 positivity. For AB thymoma, CD40 was more strongly expressed in tumor cells around the cysts (Fig. 2A). In B1 thymoma, CD40 was more expressed in the medullary islands than in the cortical areas (Fig. 2B). Claudin-4 positive was observed in 20.0% (1/5) of type A, 69.2% (9/13) of type AB, 43.5% (10/23) of type B, 40.0% (2/5) of MNT, 85.7% (6/7) of TSCC. In AB thymoma, claudin-4 was more strongly expressed in the epithelial cells surrounding the cysts in the A component (Fig. 2C). Similarly, claudin-4 expression was stronger in medullary islands of B1 thymoma (Fig. 2D). The rate of AIRE expression was 100.0% (5/5) in type A (Fig. 2E), 76.9% (10/13) in type AB (Fig. 2F), 47.8% (11/23) in type B, 40.0% (2/5) in MNT, 28.6% (2/7) in TSCC. Table 2 summarized the expression of medullary epithelial markers in the differential diagnosis. The expression of AIRE was higher in type A and AB than in B3 thymoma (p < 0.05). No significant differences in the rest groups (p > 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Expression of medullary epithelial markers in thymoma and TSCC. (a) CD40 in AB thymoma × 200; (b) CD40 in B1 thymoma × 100; (c) Claudin-4 in AB thymoma × 200; (d) Claudin-4 in B1 thymoma × 100; (e) AIRE in A thymoma × 400; (f) AIRE in AB thymoma × 400

Full size image

Correlation between thymic epithelial markers expression and histological classification

The score of thymic markers expression was used to assess the associations between thymic epithelial markers expression and histological classification. With histological classification moving from A to AB, B1, B2, B3, and TSCC, we found an inverse correlation between thymoma histological classification and CD40 and AIRE expression (Spermanr= -0.326, p = 0.024; Spermanr= -0.419, p < 0.001 respectively) (Fig. 3). There was no correlation between thymoma histological classification and β5t, PRSS16, cathepsin V and claudin-4 expression (p > 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Associations between histological classification and CD40 and AIRE expression

Full size image
Table 3 Corticomedullary epithelial immunophenotype of thymomas and TSCC
Full size table

Corticomedullary epithelial immunophenotype in 53 cases of thymoma and TSCC

The comparison of corticomedullary epithelial immunophenotype in thymomas and TSCC is shown in Fig. 4. The results are summarized in Table 3. A total number of 18 (34.0%) patients with a cortical epithelial immunophenotype, 20 (37.7%) patients with a medullary epithelial immunophenotype, 13 (24.5%) patients with a bidirectional epithelial immunophenotype, and 2 (3.8%) patients with null of corticomedullary epithelial immunophenotype.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of corticomedullary epithelial immunophenotype in thymomas and TSCC

Full size image

Cortical epithelial immunophenotype was found in 52.2% (12/23) of B thymoma, 38.5% (5/13) of AB thymoma, 14.3% (1/7) of TSCC, and not found in MNT and A thymoma. In B thymoma, the proportion of cases with a cortical epithelial immunophenotype increases successively in B1, B2, and B3. All types of thymoma and TSCC showed medullary epithelial immunophenotype. Medullary epithelial immunophenotype was found in 80.0% (4/5) of type A, 13.0% (3/23) of type B, 38.5% (5/13) of type AB, 80.0% (4/5) of MNT, 57.1% (4/7) of TSCC. Corticomedullary bidirectional epithelial immunophenotype was observed in 23.1% (3/13) of type AB, 40.0% (2/5) of B1 thymoma, 38.5% (5/13) of B2 thymoma, 28.6% (2/7) of TSCC, 20.0% (1/5) of A thymoma and not found in MNT, and B3 thymoma. Compared with type B, the portion of the medullary epithelial immunophenotype of MNT, A thymoma, and TSCC was significantly higher (p < 0.05). No correlation was found between type B and AB in corticomedullary epithelial immunophenotype (p > 0.05).

The relationship between thymic epithelial markers expression and survival

Associations between thymic epithelial markers expression, Masaoka-Koga stage, WHO classification, and survival status are summarized in Table 4. Cathepsin V was significantly correlated with PFS (p < 0.05). High cathepsin V expression was associated with a good prognosis and a longer PFS (Fig. 5), but not for OS. B2, B3, and TSCC have worse PFS and OS than type A, AB, B1, and MNT (p < 0.05). Although no relationship was found between PFS and PRSS16, claudin-4 expression, there was a trend toward improved PFS (p = 0.078, p = 0.069, respectively) with PRSS16 positive and claudin-4 negative. There were no significant associations between PFS, OS, and Masaoka-Koga stage, β5t, CD40, and AIRE expression (p > 0.05). The small number of death and recurrence precluded multivariate analysis.

Table 4 Univariate analysis of PFS and OS according to clinicopathologic patterns and thymic epithelial markers expression
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Kaplan-Meier curves of cathepsin V expression and PFS in thymomas and TSCC

Full size image

The relationship between thymic epithelial markers expression and Masaoka-Koga stage

Excluding biopsy specimens, a total of 52 thymomas and TSCC were studied, including 21 stage I, 17 stage II, 13 stage III, and 1 stage IV, and the association between Masaoka-Koga stage and immunohistochemical expression is summarized in Table 5. There was a significant difference in the β5t and CD40 expression between Masaoka-Koga I and Masaoka-Koga II, III, IV. There was no significant difference in the PRSS16, cathepsin V, claudin-4, and AIRE expression between Masaoka-Koga I and Masaoka-Koga II, III, IV.

Table 5 Masaoka-Koga stage of thymoma and TSCC according to thymic cortical and medullary markers expression
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we analyzed comprehensively the expression of thymic epithelial markers in thymoma and TSCC to examine whether they could serve as new markers for diagnosis, staging, and prognosis. We found that thymomas and TSCC showed evidence of both cortical and medullary differentiation. Most of the A thymomas, TSCC, and MNT showed a medullary epithelial immunophenotype. Type B thymomas primarily expressed a cortical epithelial immunophenotype, and B2 and B3 thymomas showed higher expression of cortical markers than B1. Type AB thymoma showed cortical or medullary epithelial immunophenotypes, and a similar proportion of cases also showed mixtures of cortical and medullary immunophenotypes.

Previous studies have discussed the cortical or medullary phenotype of thymoma, but the results are complex [4, 29, 30]. Some studies demonstrated the medullary notion of A thymoma and the cortical notion of B thymoma [4, 30], while other studies documented that medullary markers were mostly negative in A thymoma [29]. The sheets of tumor cells in MNT contain the features of A thymoma, and the similar expression of the mTEC marker suggested a common histogenesis of medullary origin [30, 31]. By morphology, type AB thymomas were composed of type A lymphocyte-poor components and type B-like lymphocyte-rich components. The corticomedullary differentiation of AB thymoma was unique showing mixed expression of cortical and medullary markers which were different from type A and B thymoma [29]. Our results were consistent with previous study indicating that AB thymoma is a distinct type of thymoma rather than a mixture of type A and type B thymoma [32].

In the differential diagnosis, in addition to applying CD20, CD3, CD5 and other immunological markers to identify background lymphocytes, β5t, PRSS16, and cathepsin V can also be applied for diagnosis. Cathepsin V is mainly expressed in type B and AB thymomas, with less expression in A thymomas. The combined application of cathepsin V and cathepsin S helped identify TSCC and B3 thymomas [22]. The expression of β5t was like that of cathepsin V and was mainly expressed in type B and AB thymomas, compared with type A thymomas and TSCC, and its expression helped to identify TSSC and B3 thymomas [18, 19]. Eriko S et al. [33] examined AIRE mRNA in 45 thymomas and found that AIRE mRNA levels were higher in B2 thymoma than in other types of thymomas, AIRE mRNA expression was lowest in AB thymoma. Some studies reported that MNT could mix with type A, AB, and B thymoma [34]. Our study proved that cortical epithelial markers (β5t, PRSS16, and cathepsin V) could distinguish AB and B thymomas from MNT and that the positive rate of cortical epithelial markers was higher in AB and B thymomas, especially in biopsy specimens with abundant lymphocyte infiltration around epithelial nodules. Moreover, our results indicated that A and AB thymomas could compose of spindle cells, the application of β5t and PRSS16 helped to identify type AB and A thymomas. It is important to identify type A and B3 thymomas because of the significant difference in disease-free and overall survival [15]. In this study, we found that the medullary epithelial marker AIRE was found to help differentiate B3 from A thymomas. In general, the perivascular spaces are obvious in B3, and the tumor cells are large, polygonal, and slightly or moderately atypical, most of them can be recognized from A thymomas, but a few B3 thymomas can show spindle cell features, which are not easily distinguished from A thymomas. Very few atypical A thymomas, with increased cell density with heterogeneity, necrosis, and mitotic, are also easily confused with B3 thymomas. In our results, the expression rate of AIRE in type A thymoma was 100%, while in B3 thymoma it was completely negative. Combined with histologic morphology, the application of AIRE is helpful for differential diagnosis. AIRE is mainly expressed in mTECs and plays a crucial role in promoting self-tolerance [35]. Thymoma has an association with autoimmune disease, and myasthenia gravis (MG) was the commonest, which usually occurs in type B thymomas, and the risk of MG increased from A to B3 thymoma [36]. The level of AIRE mRNA in type A, AB, and B1 thymoma was significantly higher than that in the B2, B3, and C (thymic carcinoma) thymoma [37]. AIRE expression in thymoma with the presence of MG was significantly lower than that in the simple thymoma without autoimmune disease [37]. Our results suggest that the AIRE expression declined from A, AB, B1, B2, B3, and TSCC, which is similar to previous studies and indicates that AIRE may be associated with the presence of MG in thymoma.

Staging, histological classification, and surgical resection status of thymoma are important factors in prognosis. In 2020, a Meta-analysis study found that the expression of many markers was associated with higher Masaoka stage of thymic tumors, including EGFR, Glut-1, EMA, Bcl-2, etc. [38]. CD40 is expressed in many tumors, but its significance is different. CD40 expression in breast and gastric cancers was associated with an earlier stage [39, 40], whereas in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma CD40 expression was associated with a more advanced pathological stage, poorer differentiation, and higher rates of lymph node metastasis, predicting an increased potential for tumor progression and metastasis [41]. In the present study, β5t and CD40 expression correlated with low Masaoka-Koga staging. In the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines of thymoma and thymic carcinoma (Version 1.2023 — December 15, 2022), postoperative management was guided by Masaoka-Koga stage especially radiation therapy [42]. Our result indicates that β5t and CD40 expression may help with postoperative treatment. We also evaluated the TNM stage by using the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals. As lymph node dissection was only performed in a few cases in our center and the rarity of distant metastasis, we only assessed the pT stages. There was no significant difference in the expression of thymic epithelial markers between different pT stages.

Cathepsin V is involved in the prognosis of many tumors. High expression of cathepsin V in ductal carcinoma in situ correlates with poor prognostic factors (histological grading, hormone receptor negativity, and HER-2 positivity) [43]. Both cathepsin V and mRNA expression were higher in hepatocellular carcinoma than in normal liver tissue, and immunohistochemical results showed that high cathepsin V expression was associated with shorter OS and DFS [44]. Kiuchi S et al. found that the expression patterns of cathepsin V and cathepsin S helped identify TSCC and B3 thymomas and the recurrence rate was higher in cathepsin V-negative patients than in cathepsin V-positive patients with TSCC [22]. In the present study, cathepsin V expression was associated with prolonged PFS. This observation was similar to those of Kiuchi S et al. [22]. However, our study had some limitations. The sample size is limited, so further sample size expansion is needed to make thymic epithelial markers can be applied more reliably.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings, for the first time, estimated the expression of thymic cortical (β5t, PRSS16, and cathepsin V) and medullary epithelial markers (AIRE, CD40, and claudin-4) in differential diagnosis, Masaoka-Koga stage, histological classification, and prognosis of thymic tumors. Our results revealed that the potential differential diagnosis utility of β5t, PRSS16, cathepsin V, and AIRE. CD40 and β5t expression were associated with the Masaoka-Koga stage of thymoma and TSCC. Cathepsin V expression can facilitate the prognosis of patients. Moreover, our results support the morphological distinction of thymoma subtypes.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TSCC:

Thymic squamous cell carcinomas

MNT:

Micronodular thymoma with lymphoid stroma

TETs:

Thymic epithelial tumors

WHO:

World Health Organization

cTECs:

Cortical thymic epithelial cells

mTECs:

Medullary thymic epithelial cells

OS:

Overall survival

PFS:

Progression-free survival

MG:

myasthenia gravis

β5t:

thymoproteasome-specific subunit β5t

PRSS16:

Thymus-specific serine protease 16

AIRE:

Autoimmune regulator

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

References

  1. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Thoracic tumours. WHO classification of Tumours. 5th ed. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Valavanis C, Stanc GM, Baltayiannis N. Classification, histopathology and molecular pathology of thymic epithelial tumors: a review. J BUON: official J Balkan Union Oncol. 2021;26(4):1198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernatz PE, Harrison EG, Clagett OT. Thymoma: a clinicopathologic study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1961;42:424–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marino M, Muller-Hermelink HK. Thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Relation of thymoma epithelial cells to the cortical and medullary differentiation of thymus. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1985;407(2):119–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okumura M, Shiono H, Minami M, Inoue M, Utsumi T, Kadota Y, et al. Clinical and pathological aspects of thymic epithelial tumors. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;56(1):10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kondo K, Yoshizawa K, Tsuyuguchi M, Kimura S, Sumitomo M, Morita J, et al. WHO histologic classification is a prognostic indicator in thymoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(4):1183–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee GD, Kim HR, Choi SH, Kim YH, Kim DK, Park SI. Prognostic stratification of thymic epithelial tumors based on both Masaoka-Koga stage and WHO classification systems. J Thorac disease. 2016;8(5):901–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tseng YC, Tseng YH, Kao HL, Hsieh CC, Chou TY, Goan YG, et al. Long term oncological outcome of thymoma and thymic carcinoma - an analysis of 235 cases from a single institution. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0179527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Alkaaki A, Abo Al-Saud A, Di Lena É, Ramirez-GarciaLuna JL, Najmeh S, Spicer J, et al. Factors predicting recurrence in thymic epithelial neoplasms. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2022;62(5).

  10. Wolf JL, van Nederveen F, Blaauwgeers H, Marx A, Nicholson AG, Roden AC, et al. Interobserver variation in the classification of thymic lesions including biopsies and resection specimens in an international digital microscopy panel. Histopathology. 2020;77(5):734–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zucali PA, Di Tommaso L, Petrini I, Battista S, Lee HS, Merino M, et al. Reproducibility of the WHO classification of thymomas: practical implications. Lung cancer (Amsterdam Netherlands). 2013;79(3):236–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roden AC, Yi ES, Jenkins SM, Edwards KK, Donovan JL, Lewis JE, et al. Reproducibility of 3 histologic classifications and 3 staging systems for thymic epithelial neoplasms and its effect on prognosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(4):427–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada Y, Tomaru U, Ishizu A, Kiuchi T, Marukawa K, Matsuno Y, et al. Expression of proteasome subunit β5t in thymic epithelial tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(9):1296–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Angirekula M, Chang SY, Jenkins SM, Greipp PT, Sukov WR, Marks RS et al. CD117, BAP1, MTAP, and TdT Is a Useful Immunohistochemical Panel to Distinguish Thymoma from Thymic Carcinoma.Cancers. 2022;14(9).

  15. Roden AC, Yi ES, Jenkins SM, Donovan JL, Cassivi SD, Garces YI, et al. Diagnostic significance of cell kinetic parameters in World Health Organization type A and B3 thymomas and thymic carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2015;46(1):17–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kojika M, Ishii G, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, Hishida T, Ota SJ, et al. Immunohistochemical differential diagnosis between thymic carcinoma and type B3 thymoma: diagnostic utility of hypoxic marker, GLUT-1, in thymic epithelial neoplasms. Mod pathology: official J United States Can Acad Pathol Inc. 2009;22(10):1341–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Illei PB, Shyu S. Fine needle aspiration of thymic epithelial neoplasms and non-neoplastic lesions. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2020;37(4):166–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamada Y, Tomaru U, Ishizu A, Kiuchi T, Marukawa K, Matsuno Y, et al. Expression of proteasome subunit beta5t in thymic epithelial tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(9):1296–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamada Y, Tomaru U, Ishizu A, Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Matsuno Y. Expression of thymoproteasome subunit β5t in type AB thymoma. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67(3):276–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomaru U, Kasahara M. Thymoproteasome: role in thymic selection and clinical significance as a diagnostic marker for thymic epithelial tumors. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2013;61(5):357–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomaru U, Yamada Y, Ishizu A, Kuroda T, Matsuno Y, Kasahara M. Proteasome subunit β5t expression in cervical ectopic thymoma. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(9):858–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiuchi S, Tomaru U, Ishizu A, Imagawa M, Kiuchi T, Iwasaki S, et al. Expression of cathepsins V and S in thymic epithelial tumors. Hum Pathol. 2017;60:66–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gommeaux J, Gregoire C, Nguessan P, Richelme M, Malissen M, Guerder S, et al. Thymus-specific serine protease regulates positive selection of a subset of CD4 + thymocytes. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39(4):956–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kawano H, Nishijima H, Morimoto J, Hirota F, Morita R, Mouri Y, et al. Aire expression is inherent to most medullary thymic epithelial cells during their differentiation program. J Immunol. 2015;195(11):5149–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang X, Laan M, Bichele R, Kisand K, Scott HS, Peterson P. Post-Aire maturation of thymic medullary epithelial cells involves selective expression of keratinocyte-specific autoantigens. Front Immunol. 2012;3(March):19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Galy AH, Spits H. CD40 is functionally expressed on human thymic epithelial cells. J Immunol. 1992;149(3):775–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ichimiya S, Kojima T. Cellular networks of human thymic medullary stromas coordinated by p53-related transcription factors. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006;54(11):1277–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bardou P, Mariette J, Escudié F, Djemiel C, Klopp C. jvenn: an interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15(1):293.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ströbel P, Hartmann E, Rosenwald A, Kalla J, Ott G, Friedel G, et al. Corticomedullary differentiation and maturational arrest in thymomas. Histopathology. 2014;64(4):557–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamada Y, Sugimoto A, Hoki M, Yoshizawa A, Hamaji M, Date H, et al. POU2F3 beyond thymic carcinomas: expression across the spectrum of thymomas hints to medullary differentiation in type a thymoma. Virchows Archiv: an international journal of pathology. 2022;480(4):843–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu PP, Su YC, Niu Y, Shi YF, Luo J, Zhong DR. Comparative clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of micronodular thymoma and micronodular thymic carcinoma with lymphoid stroma. Journal of clinical pathology. 2021;75(10):702-5.

  32. Miki Y, Hamada K, Yoshino T, Miyatani K, Takahashi K. Type AB thymoma is not a mixed tumor of type A and type B thymomas, but a distinct type of thymoma. Virchows Archiv: an international journal of pathology. 2014;464(6):725–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Suzuki E, Kobayashi Y, Yano M, Fujii Y. Infrequent and low AIRE expression in thymoma: difference in AIRE expression among WHO subtypes does not correlate with association of MG. Autoimmunity. 2008;41(5):377–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mneimneh WS, Gökmen-Polar Y, Kesler KA, Loehrer PJ, Sr., Badve S. Micronodular thymic neoplasms: case series and literature review with emphasis on the spectrum of differentiation. Mod pathology: official J United States Can Acad Pathol Inc. 2015;28(11):1415–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gardner JM, Fletcher AL, Anderson MS, Turley SJ. AIRE in the thymus and beyond. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;21(6):582–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ströbel P, Chuang WY, Chuvpilo S, Zettl A, Katzenberger T, Kalbacher H, et al. Common cellular and diverse genetic basis of thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis: role of MHC class II and AIRE genes and genetic polymorphisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1132:143–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu Y, Zhang H, Zhang P, Meng F, Chen Y, Wang Y, et al. Autoimmune regulator expression in thymomas with or without autoimmune disease. Immunol Lett. 2014;161(1):50–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zeng H, Yang W, Xu B, Zou J, Su C, Zhong B, et al. Relationship of possible biomarkers with malignancy of thymic tumors: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Slobodova Z, Ehrmann J, Krejci V, Zapletalova J, Melichar B. Analysis of CD40 expression in breast cancer and its relation to clinicopathological characteristics. Neoplasma. 2011;58(3):189–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li R, Chen WC, Pang XQ, Hua C, Li L, Zhang XG. Expression of CD40 and CD40L in gastric cancer tissue and its clinical significance. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10(9):3900–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Matsumura Y, Hiraoka K, Ishikawa K, Shoji Y, Noji T, Hontani K, et al. CD40 expression in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is Associated with Tumor Progression and Lymph Node Metastasis. Anticancer Res. 2016;36(9):4467–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in. Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Guideline Thymomas and Thymic Carcinomas V.1.2023. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022. All rights reserved. Accessed [Dec and 17 2022]. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org.

  43. Toss M, Miligy I, Gorringe K, Mittal K, Aneja R, Ellis I, et al. Prognostic significance of cathepsin V (CTSV/CTSL2) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73(2):76–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jing J, Wang S, Ma J, Yu L, Zhou H. Elevated CTSL2 expression is associated with an adverse prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11(8):4035–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Jilin Province Department of Science and Technology, Jilin Province Department of Finance, Jilin University, Health Commission of Jilin Province (grant numbers 3D5213850429, 3D5204884429, 419161900034, 3D5213025429), and Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (3A4197642429) and Science and Technology of Jilin Province, Jilin Province Key Laboratory (3D517K363429).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, 218 Ziqiang Road, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China

    Huiyang Li, Bo Ren, Shili Yu, Hongwen Gao & Ping-Li Sun

Authors
  1. Huiyang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bo Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shili Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongwen Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ping-Li Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HYL: investigation, formal analysis, writing (original draft); BR: formal analysis; SLY: resources; HWG: project administration, funding acquisition; PLS: conceptualization, writing (review and editing), project administration, funding acquisition. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping-Li Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

For this retrospective study, institutional review board approval was obtained from the local Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Jilin University (approval no. 2022 − 146; Changchun, China) and all methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for informed consent from patients was waived by the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Jilin University in view of the retrospective nature of the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Ren, B., Yu, S. et al. The clinicopathological significance of thymic epithelial markers expression in thymoma and thymic carcinoma. BMC Cancer 23, 161 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10619-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10619-6

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us