Skip to main content
Download PDF

Claudin18.2 as a potential therapeutic target for primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas and metastatic ovarian mucinous carcinomas from upper gastrointestinal primary tumours

BMC Cancer volume 23, Article number: 44 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The vast majority of ovarian mucinous carcinomas are metastatic tumours derived from nonovarian primary cancers, typically gastrointestinal neoplasms. Therapy targeting claudin18.2 might be used in gastric, gastroesophageal junction and pancreatic cancers with high expression of claudin18.2. In this study, we aimed to profile the expression of claudin18.2 in primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma (POMC) and metastatic gastrointestinal mucinous carcinoma (MGMC).

Methods

Immunohistochemistry was used to detect claudin 18.2 expression in whole tissue sections of ovarian mucinous carcinomas, including 32 POMCs and 44 MGMCs, 23 of which were derived from upper gastrointestinal primary tumours and 21 of which were derived from lower gastrointestinal primary tumours. Immunohistochemical studies for claudin18.2, SATB2, PAX8, CK7 and CK20 were performed in all 76 cases.

Results

Among 76 primary and metastatic mucinous carcinomas, claudin18.2 was expressed in 56.6% (43/76) of cases. MGMCs from the upper gastrointestinal tract, including 22 derived from primary stomach tumours and one derived from a pancreas tumour, were positive for claudin 18.2 in 69.5% (16/23) of cases. MGMCs from the lower gastrointestinal tract, including 10 derived from primary appendiceal cancer and 11 derived from colorectal cancers, showed no claudin18.2 expression (0/21). The expression rate of claudin18.2 in primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms, including 22 primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas and 10 primary ovarian borderline mucinous tumours, was 84.4% (27/32). The common immunophenotypic characteristics of POMCs, upper gastrointestinal tract-derived MGMCs, and lower gastrointestinal tract-derived MGMCs were claudin18.2 + /PAX8 + /SATB2- (17/32), claudin18.2 + /PAX8-/SATB2- (16/23) and claudin18.2-/PAX8-/SATB2 + (19/21), respectively.

Conclusion

Claudin18.2 is highly expressed in POMCs and MGMCs derived from upper gastrointestinal tract primary tumours; therefore, claudin18.2-targeted therapy might serve as a potential therapeutic strategy for POMCs and MGMCs from the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Ovarian mucinous carcinomas, including primary and metastatic cancers, account for 10 ~ 15% of epithelial ovarian cancers [1, 2], but primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma (POMC) represents only approximately 1 ~ 3% of epithelial ovarian tumours [1, 3]. Metastatic ovarian tumours may be derived from tumours in all parts of the body, and the most common primary sites are the gastrointestinal tract, breast, lung, and cervix, with gastrointestinal primary tumours, including upper and lower gastrointestinal tract tumours, being the most common origin [4, 5].

The 5-year survival rate of stage I POMC is 92%; however, if metastasis to the abdominal cavity occurs, in stage III and IV, the overall survival time is only 12–33 months, which is significantly lower than that of advanced-stage high-grade serous carcinoma (35 ~ 60 months) [3]. The prognosis of metastatic mucinous ovarian carcinoma is very poor, as patients usually die within 2 years of diagnosis; prognosis seems to be associated with the origin of ovarian metastatic carcinoma and optimal metastasectomy [6, 7]. The 5-year survival rates of metastasectomy-treated ovarian mucinous carcinoma originating from gastric, colorectal, and breast tumours are 0, 20.7 and 22.2%, respectively [7].

Since the morphological features of POMC and metastatic mucinous ovarian carcinoma are similar, differential diagnosis is difficult [8]. Furthermore, some clinicians suggest that oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil regimens are appropriate for postoperative treatment because primary mucinous carcinomas of the ovary are similar to gastrointestinal tumours [9]. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend that POMC patients be treated with gastrointestinal malignancy chemotherapy regimens such as 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, but their effectiveness has not been assessed in a large-scale study. Therefore, effective therapeutic approaches for primary and metastatic ovarian mucinous carcinoma deserve further study.

Claudin18.2 is highly expressed in gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma [10,11,12]. Claudin18.2 is a highly promising therapeutic target for claudin18.2-overexpressing tumours. Zolbetuximab (claudiximab), the first developed drug to target claudin18.2, is a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to claudin18.2 on the surface of tumour cells, triggering antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), apoptosis and inhibition of cell proliferation. Preclinical studies successfully demonstrated that it has a powerful ability to clear cancer cells and control disease. Subsequently, its clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated by phase I/II/III trials [13,14,15]. Because the high specificity of claudin18.2 helps T cells recognize tumours, it is used for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T). Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have been used to validate efficacy in vivo and thus may lead to breakthroughs, demonstrating claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells as a promising therapeutic strategy for claudin18.2-positive tumours, especially gastric cancer [16,17,18].

Claudin18 expression has been studied in borderline ovarian mucinous tumours and benign ovarian mucinous tumours [19, 20], but there is no study on claudin18.2 expression in ovarian mucinous carcinomas. Therefore, in our study, we investigated claudin18.2 expression in both POMCs and MGMCs to explore its potential role in targeted therapy.

Methods

Patient selection

Seventy-six cases of primary and gastrointestinal metastatic ovarian mucinous tumours were selected from Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital from 2013 to 2021. These included 22 POMCs, 10 primary borderline mucinous ovarian tumours, 21 lower gastrointestinal tract MGMCs (11 derived from colorectal primary tumours and 10 derived from appendix primary tumours), and 23 upper gastrointestinal tract MGMCs (22 derived from gastric primary tumours and 1 derived from a pancreatic primary tumour). Specimens were obtained for 20 cases of benign mucinous cystadenoma, 10 cases of benign ovarian serous cystadenoma, 10 cases of borderline ovarian serous tumours, 20 cases of primary ovarian serous carcinoma (10 cases of low-grade serous carcinoma and 10 cases of high-grade serous carcinoma), and 10 normal cases as a control (specimens were normal ovary and fallopian tube tissues from patients with uterine fibroids). For each specimen, the diagnosis was confirmed by two experienced pathologists according to the 2020 version of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria, and none of the selected patients had received radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgery. All study subjects gave informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital.

Immunohistochemistry

Specimens were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin, and specimen tissue wax blocks were continuously sectioned at 4 µm thickness. The slices were baked for 60 min in a 64 °C incubator. The sections were incubated 3 times in xylene for 5 min each to be completely dewaxed. The cells were incubated twice in 100% ethanol for 5 min each. The samples were hydrated by placing in 95%, 70%, 50%, and 30% ethanol for 2 min each. Antigen retrieval in citrate solution (pH = 6.0) was performed by heating in a pressure cooker to boiling, followed by spray steaming for 2 min. The sample was cooled in fine flow water to room temperature, rinsed with distilled water 2 times for 2 min each, and washed in phosphate buffered solution (PBS) 3 times for 5 min each. The samples were incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 10 min and then washed in buffer for 20 min. Primary antibody was added, incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, and washed 3 times with PBS for 5 min each. Secondary antibody was added and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in PBS 3 times, and each wash was performed for 5 min. diaminobenzidine (DAB) was added for colour development for 1 min and tap water for 2 min. The sample was stained in haematoxylin for 2 min and washed with tap water for 2 min. Then, 50%, 70%, and 95% ethanol were added for 2 min each, 100% ethanol was added 2 times for 2 min each, xylene was added 2 times for 2 min each, and a neutral gum sealing sheet was used. The stained slides were scanned with a Pannoramic SCAN slide scanner (3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) to obtain a whole slide image. The primary antibodies were rabbit anti-claudin18.2 (clone ab222512, Abcam, United Kingdom, 1:500 dilution), rabbit anti-SATB2 (clone ab92446, Abcam, United Kingdom, 1:150 dilution), mouse anti-PAX8 (clone ab53490, Abcam, United Kingdom, 1:100 dilution), mouse anti-CK7 (clone ab9021, Abcam, United Kingdom, 1:500 dilution) and rabbit anti-CK20 (clone ab76126, Abcam, United Kingdom, 1:200 dilution).

Scoring of immunohistochemistry

Claudin18.2 was expressed mainly in the cell membrane and partially in the cytoplasm, SATB2 and PAX8 were expressed in the nucleus, and CK7 and CK20 were expressed in the cytoplasm. Staining was assessed by two experienced pathologists using a double-blind method according to the proportion of positive cells (< 1% as 0, 1 ~ 25% as 1 + , 26 ~ 50% as 2 + , 51 ~ 75% as 3 + , and > 75% as 4 +) and the staining intensity (no colour is 0, weak is 1 + , moderate is 2 + , strong is 3 +). The product of the above two scores was taken as the final score. Negative expression was indicated by a score less than 4 + , and a score greater than or equal to 4 + indicated positive expression.

Analysis of publicly available data

Claudin18 expression was analysed in patients with either primary or metastatic ovarian mucinous tumours (Fig. 1A-D). The RNA sequencing data are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession numbers GSE2109, GSE26193, and GSE203611. We used the online R2 Genomics Analysis and Visualization Platform (http://r2.amc.nl) to visualize claudin18 gene expression data. To assess the expression of claudin18 protein in patient tissues of different pathological types of primary ovarian epithelial carcinoma, including serous carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and endometrioid carcinoma, we applied the HPA online platform (https://www.proteinatlas.org/).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Claudin18 is upregulated in primary ovarian epithelial mucinous tumours. A, C. Box plot of claudin18 mRNA expression derived from publicly available data for human ovarian carcinoma samples. B, D Claudin18 expression in individual ovarian primary serous and mucinous carcinoma samples (highlighted in red box) (left panel = mucinous and right panel = serous). Figures were generated with the online R2 Genomics Analysis and Visualization Platform (https://hgserver1.amc.nl/cgi-bin/r2/main.cgi). E Claudin18 protein expression derived from publicly available data for human ovarian epithelial carcinoma samples, including serous, mucinous and endometrioid carcinomas. Data were from the HPA online platform (https://www.proteinatlas.org/). F Claudin18.2 expression in ovarian primary epithelial mucinous and ovarian primary epithelial serous tumours. Ovarian epithelial mucinous tumours (benign, borderline or carcinoma) were positive for claudin18.2 expression. Ovarian epithelial serous tumours (benign, borderline or carcinoma) were negative for claudin18.2. G Claudin18.2 expression in ovarian primary epithelial mucinous carcinoma with expansile or infiltrative invasion. (bar = 50 µm)

Full size image

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software. The statistical methods used were the χ2 test, Fisher’s exact test, nonparametric test, and t test. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Claudin18.2 expression in mucinous and serous primary ovarian tumours

The mRNA expression of claudin18 in primary ovarian epithelial malignancies is shown in Fig. 1A-D. The online R2 Genomics Analysis and Visualization Platform was used to visualize claudin18 gene expression based on RNA-sequencing data in GSE2109 and GSE26193, and the levels in mucinous adenocarcinoma were significantly higher than those in serous and endometrioid adenocarcinoma (Fig. 1A, C). Furthermore, the claudin18 mRNA expression levels in individual ovarian primary mucinous and serous adenocarcinoma samples were measured (Fig. 1B, D). Moreover, as shown in Fig. 1E, claudin18 protein expression was observed in ovarian primary epithelial malignancies, and staining was strong in the membrane and partially weak in the cytoplasm in mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. However, both serous carcinomas and endometrioid carcinomas showed negative claudin18 expression.

In whole tissue sections, claudin18.2 expression was negative in normal ovarian tissues and fallopian tube tissues. Mucinous cystadenoma had a positive expression rate of 85.0% (17/20), mucinous borderline tumour had a positive expression rate of 80.0% (8/10), and mucinous adenocarcinoma had a positive expression rate of 86.4% (19/22). Among POMCs, stage I/II mucinous adenocarcinoma had a positive expression rate of 80.0% (8/10) and stage III/IV mucinous adenocarcinoma had a positive expression rate of 91.7% (11/12), with an intensity ≥ 2 + in at least 50% of stained tumour cells. In 22 PMOCs, 6 cases were presented with infiltrative invasion; 1 case of stage IC and 5 cases of stage III had infiltrative invasion. And the claudin18.2 positive rates were 83.3% (5/6) in the POMCs with infiltrative invasion and 87.5% (14/16) in the POMCs with expansile invasion. All primary ovarian serous tumours, including 10 high-grade serous carcinomas, 10 low-grade serous carcinomas, 10 borderline tumours, and 10 benign tumours, showed negative claudin18.2 expression (Table 1, Fig. 1F, G).

Table 1 Expression of claudin18.2 in POMCs and MGMCs derived from the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. POMC, primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma; MGMC, metastatic gastrointestinal mucinous carcinoma; UGI, upper gastrointestinal carcinoma; LGI, lower gastrointestinal carcinoma
Full size table

Claudin18.2 expression in MGMCs derived from upper and lower gastrointestinal tract primary tumours

As shown in Fig. 2A, B, the mRNA expression of claudin18 in ovarian metastatic mucinous tumours derived from the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract and primary ovarian mucinous tumours. Claudin18 expression levels were the lowest in metastatic ovarian mucinous tumours derived from lower gastrointestinal tract primary tumours and were significantly lower than in those of upper gastrointestinal origin.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Claudin18 is upregulated in MGMC from the upper gastrointestinal tract. A Claudin18 mRNA expression derived from publicly available human ovarian primary mucinous ovarian tumours, MGMC in upper and lower gastrointestinal tumours. Data are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE203611 (GEO Accession viewer (nih.gov)). Claudin18 expression in ovarian primary serous and mucinous carcinoma samples (highlighted in red boxes) is presented individually in (B). B Bar plot of claudin18 mRNA expression in MGMC in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tumours. C, High claudin18.2 protein expression in the MGMC of upper gastrointestinal tumours (gastric primary and pancreatic primary) and negative claudin18.2 expression in the MGMC of lower gastrointestinal tumours (colorectal primary and appendiceal primary). (bar = 100 µm)

Full size image

In whole tissue sections, there were 23 cases of MGMCs of upper gastrointestinal origin, including 22 of gastric origin and one of pancreatic origin. The claudin18.2 positive rate was 69.6% (16/23), and 56.5% (13/23) of cases including 12 derived from primary gastric cancer and one derived from primary pancreatic cancer had an intensity ≥ 2 + in at least 50% of stained tumour cells. Labelling was localized to the membrane and partially accompanied by cytoplasmic staining. In contrast, a total of 21 MGMCs of lower gastrointestinal tract origin, including 10 from primary appendiceal tumours and 11 from primary colorectal tumours, did not show significant positive expression of claudin18.2 (Table 1, Fig. 2C).

Immunohistochemical characteristics of claudin18.2, SATB2, PAX8, CK7 and CK20 in POMCs and MGMCs

POMC was compared with MGMC derived from upper and lower gastrointestinal tract primary tumours

The positive expression rate of claudin18.2 in POMCs was 84.4% (27/32), which was significantly higher than that in MGMCs derived from appendiceal and colorectal primary tumours (0/21) (P < 0.001), but not significantly different from that in MGMCs derived from the upper gastrointestinal tract primary tumours (69.6%,16/23). The positive expression rates of SATB2 in POMCs and MGMCs derived from upper gastrointestinal tract primary tumours were only 3.1% (1/32) and 4.3% (1/23), respectively, and the positive expression rate was up to 90.5% (19/21) in MGMCs from lower gastrointestinal tract tumours (P < 0.001). PAX8 expression was positive in 53.1% (17/32) of POMCs and not expressed in MGMCs (P < 0.001). The CK7 expression rate of POMCs was 96.9% (31/32), which was not different from that of upper gastrointestinal MGMCs (82.6%,19/23), but was higher than that of lower gastrointestinal MGMCs (33.3%,7/21) (P < 0.05). The CK20 expression rate of POMCs was 34.4% (11//32), which was lower than that of MGMCs derived from upper and lower gastrointestinal tract primary tumours (P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 Pathological phenotypic features of POMC and MGMC from the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. P values indicating statistical significance are denoted. p1: POMC vs. lower gastrointestinal MGMC; p2: POMC vs. upper gastrointestinal MGMC; p3: upper vs. lower gastrointestinal MGMC; NS, no significant difference
Full size table

Comparison of MGMC from the lower gastrointestinal tract with MGMC from the upper gastrointestinal tract

Claudin18.2 showed negative expression in appendiceal and colorectal MGMCs; a significantly higher positive expression rate of 69.6% (16/23) was observed for gastric and pancreatic MGMCs (P < 0.001). SATB2 was observed frequently in MGMCs derived from the appendix and colorectum (90.5%,19/21), but was only observed in 1 case (4.3%) derived from the upper gastrointestinal tract (P < 0.001). PAX8 was not expressed in MGMCs derived from either upper or low gastrointestinal tract. The CK7 expression rate of MGMCs of upper gastrointestinal tract origin was 82.6% (19/23), which was higher than that of MGMCs with lower gastrointestinal tract origin (33.3%,7/21) (P < 0.05). The rates of CK20 expression in MGMCs of upper and lower gastrointestinal tract origin were relatively high [65.2% (15/23) and 71.4% (15/21), respectively], with no significant difference (Table 2).

Therefore, the common immunophenotypic characteristics of POMCs, upper gastrointestinal tract-derived MGMCs, and lower gastrointestinal tract-derived MGMCs were claudin18.2 + /PAX8 + /SATB2- (17/32, 53.1%), claudin18.2 + /PAX8-/SATB2- (16/23, 69.6%) and claudin18.2-/PAX8-/SATB2 + (19/21, 90.4%), respectively (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

HE staining and staining for different immunophenotypic markers in POMCs and MGMCs from the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts. The immunophenotypic characteristics of POMCs, upper gastrointestinal tract MGMCs, and lower gastrointestinal tract MGMCs were claudin 18.2 + /PAX8 + /SATB2-, claudin 18.2 + /PAX8-/SATB2- and claudin 18.2-/PAX8-/SATB2 + , respectively. (bar = 100 µm)

Full size image

Discussion

The SEER data from 1973–2015 showed that mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer patients exhibited better outcomes in the localized stage (FIGO I-A, I-B, I-not otherwise specified [NOS]) and regional stage (FIGO I-C, II-A, II-B, II-C, II-NOS) than in the distant stage (FIGO III and IV); for patients diagnosed at distant disease, the 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rates for mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer were 22.1, 16.1 and 10.9%, which were even worse than those for high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (51.7, 31.9 and 15.5%) [21], which may be related to its poor response to chemotherapy and indolent biological behaviour [3, 22,23,24]. Improving the resection rate of advanced POMC can help to improve therapeutic efficacy [3]. Moreover, new strategies for the management of high-risk localized disease and advanced-stage POMC need to be assessed in clinical trials.

The prognosis of patients with gastric tumour-derived ovarian carcinomas was significantly worse than that of patients with colorectal tumour-derived ovarian carcinomas, and the survival time was 11 vs. 21.5 months [25]. Kajiyama et al. reported that 91.0% of patients with gastric tumour-derived ovarian carcinomas had recurrence, and 81.2% died of the disease during follow-up. However, 76.3% of patients with nongastric carcinoma developed recurrence, and 64.4% died of the disease. The median overall survival (OS) times were 8.1 and 28.1 months in patients with gastric cancer and nongastric cancer, respectively [26]. Among metastatic mucinous ovarian carcinoma types, those derived from the upper gastrointestinal tract have the worst prognosis, and effective therapeutics for these patients are worth exploring.

Claudin18 has two isoforms, claudin18.1 and claudin18.2, specific for pulmonary and gastric tissue, respectively. Claudin18.2 overexpression has been identified in several other types of cancers, including gastric, esophageal pancreatic adenocarcinomas [27,28,29,30]. In this study, we found a higher rate of claudin18.2 expression in POMCs and in MGMCs of upper gastrointestinal tract origin than in MGMCs of lower gastrointestinal tract origin. The positive expression rates of claudin18.2 in POMCs and borderline mucinous tumours were 86.4% and 80.0%, respectively. Positive expression was observed in 91.7% of advanced POMCs (FIGO III-IV). However, expression was negative in all ovarian serous tumours. In MGMCs, the positive expression rate of metastatic ovarian carcinomas from the upper gastrointestinal tract was 69.6%. Positive expression was observed included 15 cases of metastases from gastric cancer (15/22,68.2%) and 1 case of metastasis from pancreatic cancer (1/1), while no claudin18.2 expression was found in MGMC cases derived from the lower gastrointestinal tract.

Normally, claudin18.2 is expressed only on the surface of epithelial cells differentiated from the gastric mucosa, and claudin 18.2 expression in normal mucosal cells is restricted to the interior of the tight junction complex. However, after the occurrence of malignancy, the tight junction protein is destroyed, exposing the claudin18.2 epitope on the surface of the tumour cells, and making it an extremely ideal drug target.

Zolbetuximab(IMAB362) was the first mAb to target claudin18.2. In the FAST study, first-line treatment with zolbetuximab in gastric cancer led to a 50% increase in the progression-free survival (PFS) and a twofold increase in overall survival (OS) time [31]. Claudin18.2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction/oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients received first-line EOX (epirubicin plus oxaliplatin plus capecitabine) alone or combined with zolbetuximab. For patients with claudin18.2 expression in ≥ 70% of tumour cells, the median PFS with the zolbetuximab + EOX regimen was 9.0 months, and the median OS was 16.5 months. This group of patients benefitted most from zolbetuximab treatment. On the other hand, for patients with 40 ~ 69% claudin18.2 positive tumour cells, the median PFS with the EOX regimen was 5.7 months, and the median OS was 8.9 months [31]. In terms of efficacy, the higher the proportion of cancer cells expressing claudin18.2 is the more significant the advantage of the zolbetuximab regimen. Moreover, in the MONO study, zolbetuximab was used as monotherapy in patients with metastatic or progressive gastric/gastroesophageal junction/oesophageal cancer, including patients with moderate or strong claudin18.2 membrane staining in 50% of tumour cells. The regimen showed a 9% overall response rate (ORR) and a 23% clinical benefit rate (partial response and stable disease). In the subgroup of patients expressing claudin18.2 in ≥ 70% of the tumour cells, the ORR was increased to 14% [14]. Thus, the inclusion criterion for positive claudin18.2 expression in cancer cells was increased to 75% in many recent clinical studies [32]. In our study, a positive staining rate greater than 75% with a staining intensity score greater than 2 + was also applied as a critical value for assessing claudin18.2 expression. In the POMC group, 72.7% of patients had more than 75% claudin18.2-positive cells with moderate or strong staining, and 75.0% (9/12) of patients had in advanced-stage (stage III/IV) POMCs. For MGMCs of upper gastrointestinal tract origin, among 22 patients with tumours derived from gastric cancer, 6 patients (27.3%) had ovarian metastatic tissue with more than 75% stained tumour cells with intensity score ≥ 2 + . Moreover, one patient with pancreatic metastatic mucinous ovarian carcinoma had a score of 3 + in almost all tumour cells.

There are still limitations to this study. For both POMCs and MGMCs derived from upper gastrointestinal tract primary tumours, we should further compare claudin18.2 expression levels between primary and metastatic tumours. The combined detection of claudin18.2 and other targeted therapeutic targets, such as HER-2, PD-L1, MMR, and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), will facilitate the exploration of combined multitarget treatment strategies and the prediction of the response to these therapies for patients with POMCs and MGMCs.

According to the clinicaltrials.gov and chinadrugtrials.gov websites, dozens of clinical studies are currently ongoing to apply claudin18.2-targeted therapeutic strategies for solid tumours with high claudin18.2 expression. These claudin18.2-targeting agents include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs), and CAR-T immunotherapy. It is hoped that further clinical studies will confirm that patients with POMCs and MGMCs from the upper gastrointestinal tract with high claudin18.2 expression can benefit from therapeutic strategies targeting claudin18.2.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

POMC:

Primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma

MGMC:

Metastatic gastrointestinal mucinous carcinoma

NCCN:

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

ADCC:

Antibody-dependent cytotoxicity

CDC:

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity

CAR-T:

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell

PDX:

Patient-derived xenograft

WHO:

World Health Organization

PBS:

Phosphate buffered solution

DAB:

Diaminobenzidine

PFS:

Progression-free survival

EOX:

Epirubicin plus oxaliplatin plus capecitabine

OS:

Overall survival

ORR:

Overall response rate

TILs:

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes

mAbs:

Monoclonal antibodies

BsAbs:

Bispecific antibodies

ADCs:

Antibody-conjugated drugs

References

  1. Lheureux S, Gourley C, Vergote I, Oza AM. Epithelial ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10177):1240–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perren TJ. Mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(Suppl 1):i53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morice P, Gouy S, Leary A. Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(13):1256–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mills AM, Shanes ED. Mucinous Ovarian Tumors. Surg Pathol Clin. 2019;12(2):565–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park CK, Kim HS. Clinicopathological Characteristics of Ovarian Metastasis from Colorectal and Pancreatobiliary Carcinomas Mimicking Primary Ovarian Mucinous Tumor. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(9):5465–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Man M, Cazacu M, Oniu T. Krukenberg tumors of gastric origin versus Krukenberg tumors of colorectal origin. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2007;102(4):407–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang R, Tang J, Cheng X, Zang RY. Surgical treatment for patients with different origins of Krukenberg tumors: outcomes and prognostic factors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(1):92–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Simons M, Bolhuis T, De Haan AF, Bruggink AH, Bulten J, Massuger LF, Nagtegaal ID. A novel algorithm for better distinction of primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas and mucinous carcinomas metastatic to the ovary. Virchows Arch. 2019;474(3):289–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sato S, Itamochi H, Kigawa J, Oishi T, Shimada M, Sato S, Naniwa J, Uegaki K, Nonaka M, Terakawa N. Combination chemotherapy of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil may be an effective regimen for mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary: a potential treatment strategy. Cancer Sci. 2009;100(3):546–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SR, Shin K, Park JM, Lee HH, Song KY, Lee SH, Kim B, Kim SY, Seo J, Kim JO, et al. Clinical Significance of CLDN18.2 Expression in Metastatic Diffuse-Type Gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2020;20(4):408–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coati I, Lotz G, Fanelli GN, Brignola S, Lanza C, Cappellesso R, Pellino A, Pucciarelli S, Spolverato G, Guzzardo V, et al. Claudin-18 expression in oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas: a tissue microarray study of 523 molecularly profiled cases. Br J Cancer. 2019;121(3):257–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiyokawa T, Hoang L, Pesci A, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Oliva E, Park KJ, Soslow RA, Stolnicu S. Claudin-18 as a Promising Surrogate Marker for Endocervical Gastric-type Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2022;46(5):628–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sahin U, Schuler M, Richly H, Bauer S, Krilova A, Dechow T, Jerling M, Utsch M, Rohde C, Dhaene K, et al. A phase I dose-escalation study of IMAB362 (Zolbetuximab) in patients with advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2018;100:17–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tureci O, Sahin U, Schulze-Bergkamen H, Zvirbule Z, Lordick F, Koeberle D, Thuss-Patience P, Ettrich T, Arnold D, Bassermann F, et al. A multicentre, phase IIa study of zolbetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent or refractory advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or lower oesophagus: the MONO study. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(9):1487–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao W, Xing H, Li Y, Tian W, Song Y, Jiang Z, Yu J. Claudin18.2 is a novel molecular biomarker for tumor-targeted immunotherapy. Biomark Res. 2022;10(1):38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qi C, Gong J, Li J, Liu D, Qin Y, Ge S, Zhang M, Peng Z, Zhou J, Cao Y, et al. Claudin18.2-specific CAR T cells in gastrointestinal cancers: phase 1 trial interim results. Nat Med. 2022;28(6):1189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bebnowska D, Grywalska E, Niedzwiedzka-Rystwej P, Sosnowska-Pasiarska B, Smok-Kalwat J, Pasiarski M, Gozdz S, Rolinski J, Polkowski W. CAR-T Cell Therapy-An Overview of Targets in Gastric Cancer. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1894.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang H, Shi Z, Wang P, Wang C, Yang L, Du G, Zhang H, Shi B, Jia J, Li Q, et al. Claudin18.2-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor Engineered T Cells for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(4):409–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Halimi SA, Maeda D, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Koso T, Matsusaka K, Tanaka M, Arimoto T, Oda K, Kawana K, Yano T, et al. Claudin-18 overexpression in intestinal-type mucinous borderline tumour of the ovary. Histopathology. 2013;63(4):534–44.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Halimi SA, Maeda D, Ushiku-Shinozaki A, Goto A, Oda K, Osuga Y, Fujii T, Ushiku T, Fukayama M. Comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of the gastrointestinal and Mullerian phenotypes of 139 ovarian mucinous cystadenomas. Hum Pathol. 2021;109:21–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lan A, Yang G. Clinicopathological parameters and survival of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer by histotype and disease stage. Future Oncol. 2019;15(17):2029–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Peres LC, Cushing-Haugen KL, Kobel M, Harris HR, Berchuck A, Rossing MA, Schildkraut JM, Doherty JA. Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Survival by Histotype and Disease Stage. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(1):60–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zaino RJ, Brady MF, Lele SM, Michael H, Greer B, Bookman MA. Advanced stage mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary is both rare and highly lethal: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2011;117(3):554–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simons M, Ezendam N, Bulten J, Nagtegaal I, Massuger L. Survival of Patients With Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma and Ovarian Metastases: A Population-Based Cancer Registry Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25(7):1208–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu F, Zhao X, Mi B, Feng LU, Yuan NA, Lei F, Li M, Zhao X. Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of Krukenberg tumor. Mol Clin Oncol. 2015;3(6):1323–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kajiyama H, Suzuki S, Utsumi F, Yoshikawa N, Nishino K, Ikeda Y, Niimi K, Yamamoto E, Kawai M, Shibata K, et al. Comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes between metastatic ovarian carcinoma originating from gastrointestinal organs and advanced mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019;24(8):950–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sahin U, Koslowski M, Dhaene K, Usener D, Brandenburg G, Seitz G, Huber C, Tureci O. Claudin-18 splice variant 2 is a pan-cancer target suitable for therapeutic antibody development. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(23):7624–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Woll S, Schlitter AM, Dhaene K, Roller M, Esposito I, Sahin U, Tureci O. Claudin 18.2 is a target for IMAB362 antibody in pancreatic neoplasms. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(3):731–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rohde C, Yamaguchi R, Mukhina S, Sahin U, Itoh K, Tureci O. Comparison of Claudin 18.2 expression in primary tumors and lymph node metastases in Japanese patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49(9):870–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Arnold A, Daum S, von Winterfeld M, Berg E, Hummel M, Rau B, Stein U, Treese C. Prognostic impact of Claudin 18.2 in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas. Clin Transl Oncol. 2020;22(12):2357–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sahin U, Tureci O, Manikhas G, Lordick F, Rusyn A, Vynnychenko I, Dudov A, Bazin I, Bondarenko I, Melichar B, et al. FAST: a randomised phase II study of zolbetuximab (IMAB362) plus EOX versus EOX alone for first-line treatment of advanced CLDN18.2-positive gastric and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(5):609–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kyuno D, Takasawa A, Takasawa K, Ono Y, Aoyama T, Magara K, Nakamori Y, Takemasa I, Osanai M. Claudin-18.2 as a therapeutic target in cancers: cumulative findings from basic research and clinical trials. Tissue Barriers. 2022;10(1):1967080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank AJE (www.aje.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

The study received financial support from the Science and Technology Bureau of Qingdao West Coast New Area [grant number 2020–53] and Qingdao Medical and Health Scientific Research Plan Project [grant number 2021-WJZD201].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shan Dong, China

    Fujun Wang, Xiuzhen Du, Xiaoying Zhu, Changyu Lu, Lei Sui, Kejuan Song & Qin Yao

  2. Department of Gynecology, Junan County People’s Hospital, Junan, 276600, Shan Dong, China

    Fujun Wang

  3. Department of Gynecology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, 266011, Shan Dong, China

    Yao Yang

  4. Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, Shan Dong, China

    Yanjiao Hu & Han Zhao

Authors
  1. Fujun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiuzhen Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoying Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yanjiao Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Changyu Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lei Sui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Han Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kejuan Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Qin Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Fujun Wang collected the results, performed analysis, and wrote the manuscript. Yao Yang and Xiuzhen Du acquired and analysed the data and designed the study. Yanjiao Hu and Han Zhao analysed the pathological features and interpreted the data. Xiaoying Zhu, Changyu Lu and Lei Sui carried out the statistical analysis and collected the results. Kejuan Song finished the investigation, participated in manuscript writing, and acquired research funding. Qin Yao provided the idea, reviewed the original manuscript, and provided research funding.The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kejuan Song or Qin Yao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All study subjects gave informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital.

Consent for publication

All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Yang, Y., Du, X. et al. Claudin18.2 as a potential therapeutic target for primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas and metastatic ovarian mucinous carcinomas from upper gastrointestinal primary tumours. BMC Cancer 23, 44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10533-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10533-x

Keywords

  • Ovarian mucinous carcinoma
  • claudin18.2
  • Primary
  • Metastatic
  • Upper gastrointestinal primary
  • Lower gastrointestinal primary

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us