Skip to main content
Download PDF

Eczema as a protective factor for brain cancer: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 1360 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Brain cancer is one of the most aggressive cancer types owing to poor treatment effects. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that allergies may increase the disease risk. Therefore, this study evaluated the association between eczema and the risk of various brain cancers.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases from their inception until June 23, 2022. Two reviewers independently reviewed and screened the articles, extracted data, assessed the study quality, and pooled the results. Stata software was used to generate pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

We included 20 studies comprising 5,117,222 patients that investigated the relationship between eczema and brain cancer. Eczema was significantly inversely associated with the risk of brain cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.87), glioma (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.14–2.02), meningioma (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66–0.84), and acoustic neuroma (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41–0.88). Interesting, The strong correlation between eczema and the reduced risk of brain cancer was observed in people over 16 years old (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71–0.88), but not in those under 16 years old (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79–1.11). In addition, subgroup analyses found that eczema significantly decreased the glioma risk in Europeans (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65–0.82) but not Australians (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.14–2.02) or Americans (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.69–1.46).

Conclusion

Eczema may be considered as a potential protective factor of brain cancer in population aged over 16 years. However, this relationship requires verification using large-scale clinical data.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Brain cancer is one of the most aggressive tumors owing to poor treatment effects [1, 2]. More than 90% of brain tumors occur in the brain parenchyma, with the remainder occurring in the meninges, spinal cord, and cranial nerves [3, 4]. Brain cancers are the primary cause of cancer-related deaths in children and adults worldwide. In 2016, 330,000 central nervous system cancer cases were reported globally, of which 227,000 patients died [5]. The reasons for high rates of brain tumor recurrence and mortality remain unclear. However, several have investigated the potential risk factors for brain tumors. For example, epidemiological studies have shown that air pollution, diet, allergies, medications, genetic predispositions, and some demographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex, and race) may increase the disease risk [6]. However, these factors require confirmation. Therefore, the need to identify new reliable risk factors for early brain tumor interventions is urgent.

Eczema is a common chronic cutaneous inflammatory disease affecting 10–30% of children and 2–10% of adults worldwide [7]. Some reports indicate that eczema affects the cancer risk, but the results are controversial [8, 9]. Therefore, this study performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between eczema and brain cancer to clarify the risk factors.

Methods

Search strategy

This meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) [10] and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) [11] guidelines. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for studies focusing on the relationship between eczema and brain cancers from inception until June 23, 2022. Supplementary Material 1 describes the specific search parameters. Two reviewers (LJ and ZY) independently performed a preliminary screening of relevant literature based on the titles and abstracts. Then, the full text of these papers was reviewed to identify those suitable for analysis. Differences in opinions were resolved through a discussion with the corresponding author. In addition, articles in the bibliographies of the papers mentioned above that met the screening criteria were also assessed for analysis potential.

Selection criteria

The inclusion criteria were: a) human studies; b) observational studies including cohort and case-control study designs; c) published in English; and d) studies focusing on the relationship between eczema and the risk of brain tumors.

The exclusion criteria were: a) reviews, animal studies, abstracts, or conference proceedings; b) unpublished data or case reports; c) duplicate literature and duplicate data; and d) studies lacking specific data on exposure (eczema) and endpoints (brain tumors).

Data extraction and quality assessment

The following relevant information was independently extracted by two reviewers (XSL and XYD) from the included studies: first author’s name, country of origin, publication year, study design, sample size, age, percentage of females, tumor type, number of patients, years of follow-up, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For this meta-analysis, we defined eczema as the exposure factor and the occurrence of various brain tumors as the outcome. Data not directly obtainable from the text were extracted from the associated information (e.g., graphs). The corresponding authors were contacted to retrieve missing data.

Two authors (TYR and YWM) used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) [12] to evaluate the quality of the included studies based on three aspects: selection, comparability, and outcome assessments. The scores were summed, and studies with NOS scores of ≥5 were considered high quality [13].

Statistical analyses

Stata software (version 12.0; Stata Corp. LLC, College Station, TX, USA) was used for the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity of the included papers was estimated using a homogeneity test (Q test) and the I2 value. A P-value of > 0.1 and I2 value of < 50% indicated acceptable heterogeneity, and then a fixed effects model was used to calculate pooled ORs and 95% CIs [14]; otherwise, the random effects model was used [15]. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine differences in the associations between eczema and brain tumors by age (≥16 years and <16 years) and study location (Australians, Americans, Europe and others). Sensitivity analyses were also performed by excluding one study at a time and then rerunning the analyses to calculate the effects for the remaining studies to determine if the pooled results were markedly affected by a single study. Finally, publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s weighted regression test.

Results

Search results and study descriptions

We retrieved 9382 records that included 5,117,222 patients. After screening the titles and abstracts, 9148 studies were removed. After assessing the full text of the remaining articles and relevant articles in their bibliographies, 20 studies [16–35] were included (Fig. 1). Of these, two studies [20, 35] were cohort studies, and 18 [16–19, 21–34] were case-control studies. The ages of the participants ranged from 1 to 99 years. All included studies had a NOS score greater than 5 and met the inclusion criteria; Table 1 presents these results.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram summarizing the pooled analysis phases

Full size image
Table 1 Basic characteristics of the included studies
Full size table

Eczema and brain cancer risk

Eczema was significantly associated with a decreased brain cancer risk in the analysis with all 20 studies [16–35] (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.87; Fig. 2A). Insignificant heterogeneity greatly enhanced the reliability of the results (P = 0.004, I2 = 48.1%; Fig. 2A). The sensitivity analysis indicated that excluding each study in turn all studies were distributed between the upper and lower 95% CIs with the estimation line, and excluding any one study did not alter the overall combined results (Fig. 2B). Publication bias, assessed by Begg’s rank correlation and Egger’s linear regression, did not identify publication bias among the studies (Begg’s: P > |z| = 0.362; Egger’s: P = 0.183, 95% CI: − 1.900–0.384; Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The association between eczema and brain cancer risk. A Forest plot of the estimated effects of eczema on brain cancer risk. B Sensitivity analysis conducted by recalculating the pooled results of the primary analysis following the exclusion of one study per iteration. C Begg’s and Egger’s tests indicate the lack of publication bias among such studies. D Subgroup analysis of the estimated effects of eczema on brain cancer risk. CI, Confidence interval; ES, Effect size

Full size image

Next, to test this hypothesis that the brain cancer risk might be influenced in different aged eczema patients, subgroup analyses based on age were performed; we identified a strong association between eczema and brain cancer risk in those aged over 16 years (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71–0.88) but no association for those under 16 years old (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79–1.11; Fig. 2D).

Eczema and glioma risk

Eczema significantly decreased the glioma risk (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66–0.89; Fig. 3A); the analysis included 16 studies [16–22, 24–27, 29–31, 33, 34]. The sensitivity analysis confirmed that the meta-analysis was robust (Fig. 3B). However, significant heterogeneity was observed (P = 0.001, I2 = 59.6%; Fig. 3A). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the study region, indicating that eczema significantly decreased the glioma risk for Europeans (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65–0.82), and the heterogeneity disappeared (P = 0.515, I2 = 0.0%). However, the relationship between eczema and glioma risk was statistically insignificant for Australians (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.14–2.02; I2 = 68.7%) and Americans (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.69–1.46; I2 = 41.5%) (Fig. 3C). Therefore, the study region may be a source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was not observed among the studies (Begg’s: P > |z| = 0.685; Egger’s: P = 0.344, 95% CI: − 2.635–0.983; Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The association between eczema and glioma risk. A Forest plot of the estimated effects of eczema on glioma risk. B Sensitivity analysis. C Subgroup analysis of the estimated effects of eczema on glioma risk. D Begg’s and Egger’s tests indicate the lack of publication bias among such studies. CI, Confidence interval; ES, Effect size

Full size image

Eczema and meningioma risk

Eczema was significantly associated with a decreased risk of meningioma (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66–0.84); the analysis included nine studies [16, 18–20, 23, 24, 26, 30, 33]. Heterogeneity was not observed (P = 0.996, I2 = 0.0%; Fig. 4A), and excluding individual studies did not alter the overall results (Fig. 4B), indicating that these results were reliable.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The association between eczema and meningioma risk. A Forest plot of the estimated effects of eczema on meningioma risk. B Sensitivity analysis. CI, Confidence interval

Full size image

Eczema and acoustic neuroma risk

Eczema was significantly associated with a decreased risk of acoustic neuroma (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41–0.88); the analysis included two studies [19, 30]. There was no heterogeneity (P = 0.366, I2 = 0.0%; Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot of the estimated effects of eczema on acoustic neuroma risk. Confidence interval

Full size image

Discussion

This meta-analysis aimed to advance our understanding of the association between eczema and brain cancer by analyzing 20 related papers. The strong correlation between eczema and the reduced risk of brain cancer was observed in people over the age of 16, but not in the age of 16, which indicated that eczema may be considered as a potential protective factor when assessing the risk of brain cancer in population aged over 16 years. At the same time, eczema was significantly associated with a decreased risk of glioma, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma. However, the relationship between eczema and the risk of glioma differed regionally. Specifically, eczema significantly decreased the glioma risk in the European subgroup without heterogeneity but not in the Australian and American subgroups.

Many previous studies have investigated associations between allergic diseases and the risk of various cancers [29, 36, 37] but with inconsistent results. For instance, Hwang et al. reported complex and site-specific relationships between allergic diseases (e.g., eczema, allergic rhinitis, and asthma) and cancer risk [8]. Unexpectedly, the incidence of brain cancer was higher in patients with eczema [36]; however, the sample size was too small to be reliable. Conversely, another study reported that children with eczema did not have a lower risk of brain tumors (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.17–1.57) [29], which supported our subgroup analysis results. Additionally, a recent study demonstrated that eczema, an allergic disease that increases immune surveillance, may be related to the low risk of many cancers, supporting our results [37]. Unlike our meta-analysis, these reviews preferentially pooled crude estimates and included broader criteria, focusing on the effects of all allergic diseases on the incidence of several cancers; nonetheless, their results were consistent with ours.

Numerous studies have reported inverse associations between eczema and several cancer sites [31, 38, 39]. However, how eczema affects the incidence of tumors remains debatable. Many researchers agree that the severity of eczema varies widely, and only the most severe cases are identifiable [34]. However, in our study, eczema was associated with a reduced risk of brain cancer. Some theories have been proposed to support this conclusion. Specifically, the effects of allergic diseases on the risk of glioma are close to consensus. One hypothesis is that since eczema is an allergic disease, it may indicate a high state of immune surveillance [40–42]. Consequently, the overactive immune system suppresses abnormal cell growth or proliferation. However, the mechanisms by which the enhanced immune surveillance hypothesis helps suppress tumor growth remain unclear. An additional explanation for this protective effect is that allergies are a defense mechanism against infestation by large parasites and environmental toxins [43]. As a result, individuals with stronger allergic reactions excrete and eliminate environmental toxins or carcinogens more efficiently throughout their lives than those without strong reactions. Interestingly, the association between eczema and glioma risk varied in the European, Australian, and American regions. However, the mechanisms underlying these differences have not been elucidated. Studies have shown that the glioma incidence rate varies globally, with the highest rates observed in America, Australia, and Northern Europe [44]. Therefore, the risk of glioma is closely related to the region, descent, and race or ethnicity [45].

This study had some limitations. First, some of our results had heterogeneity, which might affect their reliability. However, heterogeneity did not exist between eczema and meningiomas and acoustic neuromas; the relationship between eczema and glioma was an exception. Therefore, heterogeneity minimally affected our conclusions. Second, our study population spanned a wide age range, but data limitations prevented us from investigating the effects of age on the results; we could only evaluate associations. Finally, we did not find publication bias in our analyses because researchers only reported positive results. Therefore, we inevitably could not assess the effects of unpublished studies with negative results. Nonetheless, our study included many patients and individually eliminated studies to evaluate sensitivity, making our results more comprehensive and reliable.

Conclusion

Eczema was significantly inversely associated with the risk of brain cancer, including glioma, meningioma, and acoustic neuroma. Therefore, eczema is a promising predictor of brain tumor risk. However, the study location affects this relationship. Therefore, these results require validation in large randomized controlled trials.

Availability of data and materials

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Wang X, Wu C, Liu S, Peng D. Combinatorial therapeutic strategies for enhanced delivery of therapeutics to brain cancer cells through nanocarriers: current trends and future perspectives. Drug Deliv. 2022;29(1):1370–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hormuth DA, Farhat M, Christenson C, Curl B, Chad Quarles C, Chung C, et al. Opportunities for improving brain cancer treatment outcomes through imaging-based mathematical modeling of the delivery of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;187:114367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lapointe S, Perry A, Butowski NA. Primary brain tumours in adults. Lancet. 2018;392(10145):432–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duke ES, Packer RJ. Update on pediatric brain tumors: the molecular era and neuro-immunologic beginnings. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020;20(8):30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Athanasiou E, Gargalionis AN, Boufidou F, Tsakris A. The association of human herpesviruses with malignant brain tumor pathology and therapy: two sides of a coin. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(5):2250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Adel Fahmideh M, Scheurer ME. Pediatric brain tumors: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, and future directions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2021;30(5):813–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gregory I, Marshall H. Cochrane corner: phototherapy for atopic eczema. Clin Exp Allergy. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.14230.

  8. Hwang CY, Chen YJ, Liu HN, Chang YT. Response to eczema and cancer risk: a critical appraisal and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165(3):462–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai SCS, Li W, Tian EAL, Allen JC, Tey HL. Topical calcineurin inhibitors in eczema and cancer association: a cohort study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2016;27(6):531–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;151(4):264–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L, Sheng J, Zhang H, Xie B, Xiang L, Liu D, et al. The association between long noncoding RNA over expression and poor prognosis of liver cancer: a meta-analysis. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:1395131.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leonard T, Duffy JC. A Bayesian fixed effects analysis of the mantel-Haenszel model applied to meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryan P, Lee MW, North B, McMichael AJ. Risk factors for tumors of the brain and meninges: results from the Adelaide adult brain tumor study. Int J Cancer. 1992;51(1):20–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cicuttini FM, Hurley SF, Forbes A, Donnan GA, Salzberg M, Giles GG, et al. Association of adult glioma with medical conditions, family and reproductive history. Int J Cancer. 1997;71(2):203–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlehofer B, Blettner M, Preston-Martin S, Niehoff D, Wahrendorf J, Arslan A, et al. Role of medical history in brain tumour development. Results from the international adult brain tumour study. Int J Cancer. 1999;82(2):155–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brenner AV, Linet MS, Fine HA, Shapiro WR, Selker RG, Black PM, et al. History of allergies and autoimmune diseases and risk of brain tumors in adults. Int J Cancer. 2002;99(2):252–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartzbaum J, Jonsson F, Ahlbom A, Preston-Martin S, Lönn S, Söderberg KC, et al. Cohort studies of association between self-reported allergic conditions, immune-related diagnoses and glioma and meningioma risk. Int J Cancer. 2003;106(3):423–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartzbaum J, Ahlbom A, Malmer B, Lönn S, Brookes AJ, Doss H, et al. Polymorphisms associated with asthma are inversely related to glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res. 2005;65(14):6459–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Hepworth SJ, McKinney PA, van Tongeren M, Muir KR. History of allergies and risk of glioma in adults. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(9):2165–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Hepworth SJ, van Tongeren M, Muir KR, McKinney PA. History of allergic disease and risk of meningioma. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(5):477–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wigertz A, Lönn S, Schwartzbaum J, Hall P, Auvinen A, Christensen HC, et al. Allergic conditions and brain tumor risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(8):941–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harding NJ, Birch JM, Hepworth SJ, McKinney PA. Atopic dysfunction and risk of central nervous system tumours in children. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(1):92–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Berg-Beckhoff G, Schüz J, Blettner M, Münster E, Schlaefer K, Wahrendorf J, et al. History of allergic disease and epilepsy and risk of glioma and meningioma (INTERPHONE study group, Germany). Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(8):433–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Il'yasova D, McCarthy B, Marcello J, Schildkraut JM, Moorman PG, Krishnamachari B, et al. Association between glioma and history of allergies, asthma, and eczema: a case-control study with three groups of controls. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18(4):1232–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ. Risk factors for pituitary tumors: a case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18(5):1492–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roncarolo F, Infante-Rivard C. Asthma and risk of brain cancer in children. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23(4):617–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Turner MC, Krewski D, Armstrong BK, Chetrit A, Giles GG, Hours M, et al. Allergy and brain tumors in the INTERPHONE study: pooled results from Australia, Canada, France, Israel, and New Zealand. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(5):949–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Amirian ES, Zhou R, Wrensch MR, Olson SH, Scheurer ME, Il'Yasova D, et al. Approaching a scientific consensus on the association between allergies and glioma risk: a report from the glioma international case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25(2):282–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lupatsch JE, Bailey HD, Lacour B, Dufour C, Bertozzi AI, Leblond P, et al. Childhood brain tumours, early infections and immune stimulation: a pooled analysis of the ESCALE and ESTELLE case-control studies (SFCE, France). Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;52:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pouchieu C, Raherison C, Piel C, Migault L, Carles C, Fabbro-Perray P, et al. Allergic conditions and risk of glioma and meningioma in the CERENAT case-control study. J Neuro-Oncol. 2018;138(2):271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. D'Arcy M, Rivera DR, Grothen A, Engels EA. Allergies and the subsequent risk of cancer among elderly adults in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2019;28(4):741–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mansfield KE, Schmidt SAJ, Darvalics B, Mulick A, Abuabara K, Wong AYS, et al. Association between atopic eczema and cancer in England and Denmark. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(10):1086–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wedgeworth E, Powell AM, Flohr C. Eczema and cancer risk: a critical appraisal and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165(3):457–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Karim AF, Westenberg LEH, Eurelings LEM, Otten R, Gerth van Wijk R. The association between allergic diseases and cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Neth J Med. 2019;77(2):42–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gandini S, Lowenfels AB, Jaffee EM, Armstrong TD, Maisonneuve P. Allergies and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis with review of epidemiology and biological mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14(8):1908–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Prizment AE, Folsom AR, Cerhan JR, Flood A, Ross JA, Anderson KE. History of allergy and reduced incidence of colorectal cancer, Iowa Women’s health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16(11):2357–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Linos E, Raine T, Alonso A, Michaud D. Atopy and risk of brain tumors: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(20):1544–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McCarthy BJ, Rankin K, Il'yasova D, Erdal S, Vick N, Ali-Osman F, et al. Assessment of type of allergy and antihistamine use in the development of glioma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20(2):370–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wiemels JL, Wiencke JK, Sison JD, Miike R, McMillan A, Wrensch M. History of allergies among adults with glioma and controls. Int J Cancer. 2002;98(4):609–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Palm NW, Rosenstein RK, Medzhitov R. Allergic host defences. Nature. 2012;484(7395):465–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Leece R, Xu J, Ostrom QT, Chen Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. Global incidence of malignant brain and other central nervous system tumors by histology, 2003-2007. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(11):1553–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Walsh KM, Neff C, Bondy ML, Kruchko C, Huse JT, Amos CI, et al. Influence of county-level geographic/ancestral origin on glioma incidence and outcomes in US Hispanics. Neuro Oncol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac175.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the “Special and Joint Program” of the Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department, Kunming Medical University, the Yunnan Health Training Project of High-level Talents, and the Scientific Research Fund project of Yunnan Education Department.

Funding

We would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 31960136 and 81760136), the “Special and Joint Program” of the Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department and Kunming Medical University (202001AY070001–097), the Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province (202201AT070285), the Reserve Talent Program for Young Academic and Technical Leaders, the Yunnan Health Training Project of High-Level Talents, and the Scientific Research Fund project of Yunnan Education Department (2021 J0304) for supporting our work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yuxi, Yunnan, China

    Yun Zhu, Shuangyan Xu & Weimin Yan

  2. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China

    Yun Zhu

  3. Department of General Medicine, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yuxi, Yunnan, China

    Yirong Teng

  4. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China

    Yinde Xu, Boheng Zhu & Jie Liu

Authors
  1. Yun Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yirong Teng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shuangyan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yinde Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Boheng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weimin Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jie Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Yun Zhu, Jie Liu, Weimin Yan, Yirong Teng, Shuangyan Xu, Boheng Zhu and Yinde Xu prepared the materials, collected the data, and performed the analyses. Yun Zhu, Jie Liu and Weimin Yan wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Jie Liu and Boheng Zhu revised the manuscript. All the authors commented on and revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weimin Yan or Jie Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

These authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. 

Supplementary Material.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Teng, Y., Xu, S. et al. Eczema as a protective factor for brain cancer: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 22, 1360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10471-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10471-0

Keywords

  • Eczema
  • Brain cancer
  • Glioma
  • Meningioma
  • Acoustic neuroma
  • Risk

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us