Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prostate cancers in men under the age of 50: about a series in Togo, Sub-Saharan Africa

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 1341 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer is a public health problem and increasingly diagnosed in men under 50 years of age. This cancer occurs much more in subjects of advanced age, generally over sixty. The aim of the study was to describe the epidemiological, clinical and histopathological aspects of prostate cancer in men under the age of 50 in Togo.

Methods

It was a retrospective descriptive, cross-sectional study of histologically confirmed cases of prostate cancer in young adults at the Pathological Laboratory of Lomé over a period of 10 years (2011–2020).

Results

In total, 29 cases of prostate cancer in patients under 50 years of age. The proportion of prostate cancers in men under 50 was 0.7% of all prostate cancers, The average age of the patients was 45 years with extremes of 35 and 49 years. Twelve patients had a family history of prostate cancer, with a statistically significant relationship between the existence of a family history of prostate cancer and the age of onset of the cancer (p-value = 0.03). The dominant clinical information was prostatic hypertrophy (40.37%), followed by acute urine retention (20.69%) and micturition disorders (17.27%). The median Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was 188 ng/ml with extremes of 20 ng/ml and 2100 ng/ml. A large proportion of patients had a PSA between 100 and 500 ng/ml. Histologically, they were all prostatic acinar adenocarcinomas. These adenocarcinomas were well differentiated (48%) and moderately differentiated (38%). The predominant histoprognostic grade was ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade 1 which was noted in 65.52%, followed by grade 2 in 20.69%.

Conclusion

Prostate cancer in men under 50 years of age is relatively rare in Togo, sometimes occurring in the context of a family history of prostate cancer. Hence the importance of raising awareness among the male population, especially with a family history of prostate cancer, to start screening early, around the age of 40.

Peer Review reports

Background

Prostate cancer, a public health problem, is defined as malignant cell proliferation at the expense of normal prostate constituents [1]. In 2020, prostate cancer was the 4th most diagnosed cancer in the world in terms of incidence, with 1.4 million new cases representing 7.3% of all diagnosed cancers and responsible for 375 thousand deaths [2]. Histologically, it is adenocarcinoma in more than 90% of cases; squamous cell carcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma are very rare [3, 4].

Prostate cancer mainly affects subjects over 70 years old with an average age at diagnosis of 74 years, diagnosed in 45% of cases after 75 years [2]. It is exceptional in men under 50, with an average frequency of 0.5% [5]. Young adult prostate cancer is a cancer that occurs in people up to the age of 50 [6, 7]. The incidence of prostate cancer in young adults (≤ 50 years old) increased 5.7 times, from 5.6 to 32 cases per 100,000 person-years between 1986 and 2008 [7, 8]. Using epidemiological surveillance results from 17 regions of the United States, Salinas et al. found an increase in the incidence of prostate cancer in men aged 20–49, especially since 1991; these cancers accounted for 10% of new cases diagnosed in 2013 [6]. Current literature suggests that the clinical features and prognosis of prostate cancer in young adults are contradictory and remain unresolved; some authors have suggested that young age is an indicator of poor prognosis [9, 10].

Several studies have reported a better survival outcome in men younger than 50 years [5, 11]. However, others have found no significant difference in recurrence, histologic grade, and stage of disease [12, 13].

Prostate cancer is the most common urological cancer in Togo representing 74.63% of all urological cancers; these cancers occur in 8.3% of subjects under 50 years old [3, 4].

As these studies do not focus specifically on prostate cancer in young adults, we initiated this study with the objective of updating the epidemiologic, clinical, and histopathologic aspects of prostate cancer in men under the age of 50.

Methods

It was a cross-sectional descriptive study carried out among prostate cancers diagnosed histologically in subjects under 50 years of age at the Pathological Anatomy Laboratory of Lomé University Hospital over a period of 10 years (2011–2020). Togo is a country of 56,600Km2, with an estimated population of 7,200,000 inhabitants, located between Ghana in the west, Benin in the east and Burkina faso in th north. These cases were collected from the registers of the said laboratory. The study material consisted of biopsies and surgical specimens fixed in 10% buffered formalin and was processed according to conventional histology techniques.

The variables studied were frequency, age, personal or family history of prostate cancer, clinical signs, PSA level, nature of the specimen, histological group and type.

Data was entered twice in Microsoft Excel to reduce data entry errors and then exported to Epi Info version 7 software. A descriptive analysis was carried out with a view to highlighting the characteristics of the various qualitative and quantitative variables. We used the percentages for the qualitative variables and the means with their standard deviations for the quantitative variables. The statistical tests used were the Pearson Chi-square test for the qualitative variables and the Student test for the quantitative variables. The significance threshold was set at 0.05.

Results

Epidemiological data

A total, 29 cases of prostate cancer were collected in men under 50, an annual frequency of 2.9 cases. During the same period, 4200 cases of prostate cancer were globally collected. The proportion of prostate cancers in men under 50 was 0.7% of all prostate cancers. The average age of the subjects was 45 years with extremes of 35 and 49 years. Subjects between 45 and 50 years of age represented 48.83% (13 cases) of all cases. Regarding family history of prostate cancer, 12 patients (41.38%) had a family history of prostate cancer. We noted a statistically significant relationship between the existence of a family history of prostate cancer and the age of occurrence of the cancers (p-value = 0.03). (Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of patients by family history of prostate cancer/age
Full size table

Clinical and biological data

Clinical information was represented by prostatic hypertrophy in 12 cases (41.38%), acute retention of urine in 6 cases (20.69%), micturition disorders without further specification in 5 cases (17.24%), hematuria in 3 cases (10.34%), back pain with 2 cases (6.90%) and adenopathy in 1 case (3.45%). The median PSA level was 188 ng/ml with extremes of 20 ng/ml and 2100 ng/ml. Eighteen patients (18; 62.07%) had a PSA level between 100 and 500 ng/ml. (Table 2)

Table 2 Distribution of patients by PSA level (ng/ml)
Full size table

Pathological data

The diagnosis was made on 19 prostate biopsies (65.52%) and 10 prostate adenomectomy specimens (34.48%). Histologically, all were prostatic acinar adenocarcinomas. These adenocarcinomas were well differentiated in 14 cases (48.27%), moderately differentiated in 11 cases (37.93%) and poorly differentiated in 4 cases (13.79%).

ISUP histoprognostic grade 1 (Gleason score 6) was found in 19 cases (65.52%), followed by grade 5 (Gleason score 9 or 10) in 4 cases (13.8%). There was no statistically significant relationship between the histoprognostic grade of ISUP and the age of cancer occurrence (p-value = 1.06), nor with the existence of a family history of cancer (p-value = 2.21). (Table 3).

Table 3 Distribution of patients by ISUP grade/age/family history of prostate cancer
Full size table

For the 10 cases of adenomectomy, the pTNM stage was specified in 6 cases. These were 4 cases of stage pT1N0M0, one case of stage pT2N0M0 and pT2N1M0 respectively.

The surgical limits were in healthy areas in 9 cases (R0) and in microscopically tumorous areas in 1 case (R1).

Discussion

In our study, the proportion of prostate cancer in subjects under 50 years of age was 0.7%. This proportion is similar to that of Alioune et al. in Senegal who found a frequency of 0.45% [14]. This frequency is lower than that of Catalona et al. who found a frequency of 2% of prostate cancer in subjects under 50 years of age [15]. The frequency of prostate cancer in young adults is 4% in Australians and Asians, and 9% and 3% respectively in Caucasians and black Americans [5]. This low frequency in sub-Saharan Africa is underestimated and may be related to the under-medicalization of the health care system, the geographical and financial inaccessibility of health care facilities, the difficulties of diagnosis, the shortage of specialist pathologists and oncologists, and the absence of a program to control cancer in general and prostate cancer in particular.

The average age of our subjects was 45 years. Similar mean ages have been reported by Alioune et al. and Varkarakis et al. of 44.99 and 41.7 years, respectively [14, 16].

It is estimated that 43% of prostate cancers occurring before the age of 50 are hereditary forms [10, 17]. In our series, 41.38% of patients had a family history of prostate cancer, with a statistically significant relationship between the existence of a family history of prostate cancer and the age of onset of the cancers (p-value = 0.03). Rouprêt et al. found a family history of prostate cancer in 33.6% of patients [18].

Clinically, 41.38% of our patients had prostatic hypertrophy. In the series of Alioune et al. and Huang et al. the discovery was incidental in the majority of cases, respectively in 55.9% and 38% [10, 14].

The median PSA level of our patients was 188 ng/ml. This level is much higher than that of Alioune et al. and Varkarakis, which were 26.62 ng/ml and 3.8 ng/ml respectively [14, 16]. Screening for prostate cancer in the presence of elevated serum PSA levels has been used in men over the age of 50 since at least 1992. No medical organization has recommended PSA screening for men in their 30 or 40 s [5].

Histologically, these were all prostatic acinar adenocarcinomas. These adenocarcinomas were predominantly ISUP grade 1 (Gleason score 6) in 65.52%, followed by ISUP grade 5 (Gleason score 9 or 10) in 13.8%. Varkarakis et al. and Huang et al. found a predominance of ISUP grade 2 [10, 16]. Alioune et al. found a predominance of ISUP grade 3 (Gleason score 7 = 4 + 3) [14]. Similar findings were made by Ji et al. who found a predominance of ISUP grade 3, with a statistically significant correlation with age (p-value = 0.002) [19]. Ji et al. report that men aged ≤ 50 years or > 75 years have clinically significant higher grades of prostate cancer compared to patients aged 55–75 years [19].

We did not find a statistically significant relationship between the histoprognostic grade of ISUP and age of cancer occurrence (p-value = 1.06), nor with the existence of a family history of prostate cancers (p-value = 2.21). Similarly, Huang et al. did not find a statistically significant association between histopronostic grade and age (p-value = 0.652) [10]. Bleyer et al. and Ji et al. found a statistically significant relationship between histopronostic grade and age with p-values of 0.043 and 0.002 respectively [5, 19]. Several studies have reported a better survival outcome in men younger than 50 years [5, 11]. However, others have found no significant difference in recurrence, histologic grade, and disease stage [12, 13]. This raises the issue of the age of onset of prostate cancer screening, especially with more and more cases diagnosed around 40 years old [20].

Regarding the pTNM classification, we found 4 cases of stage pT1N0M0 out of the 6 cases specified. Review of the literature indicates that earlier detection of the prostate cancer with low grade and stage disease in young men has a superior disease outcome [7].

Aprikian et al. revealed similar histologic grade and disease stage, between the younger and older population [21].

Limitations

Our study has limitations common to retrospective studies, including the absence of data such as family history of prostate cancer in the majority of the records. The absence of a population-based cancer registry also makes it difficult to compare our results to those of the general population. However, it is of interest because it is the second study in sub-Saharan Africa on prostate cancer in subjects under 50 years of age, apart from the study by Alioune et al. [14].

Conclusion

Prostate cancer is a public health problem in Togo, occurring most often in men over 75 years of age. These cancers of young adults are most often hereditary forms, diagnosed generally at high grades ; which is not the case in Togo, probably due to the small sample size. Hence the importance of raising awareness among the male population, especially with a family history of prostate cancer, to start screening early, around the age of 40.

Availability of data and materials

Extracted data are with the corresponding author and available under reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PSA:

Prostate Specific Antigen

ISUP:

International Society of Urological Pathology

References

  1. Schatten H. Brief overview of prostate Cancer Statistics, Grading, diagnosis and treatment strategies. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1095:1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hyuna S, Jacques F, Rebecca L, Siegel, Mathieu L, Isabelle S, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin. 2021;0:1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Darré T, Folligan k, Kpatcha TM, Kanassoua K, Sewa E, Daré S, et al. Evolution of the histo-epidemiological profile of Urological Cancers in Togo from 2012 to 2016. Azian pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(2):491–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Darré T, Amégbor K, Kpatcha TM, Tengue K, Sonhaye L, Doh K, et al. Cancers urologiques au Togo: profil histoépidémiologique à propos de 678 cas. J Afr Cancer. 2014;6:27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bleyer A, Spreafico F, Barr R. Prostate cancer in young men: an emerging young adult and older adolescent challenge. Cancer. 2020;126:46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salinas CA, Tsodikov A, Ishak-Howard M, Cooney KA. Prostate Cancer in Young Men: an important clinical entity. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:317–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussein S, Satturwar S, Van der Kwast T. Young-age prostate cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68:511–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sartor O. Why is prostate cancer incidence rising in young men? Cancer. 2020;126:17–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang T-H, Kuo J-Y, Huang Y-H, Chung H-J, Huang WJS, Wu HHH, et al. Prostate cancer in young adults-seventeen-year clinical experience of a single center. J Chin Med Assoc. 2017;80:39–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sasaki H, Miki J, Hasegawa T, Hasegawa N, Ikemoto I, Ohishi Y. [Prostatic cancer in a young adult: a report of 2 cases]. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2004;50:57–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benson MC, Kaplan SA, Olsson CA. Prostate cancer in men less than 45 years old: influence of stage, grade and therapy. J Urol. 1987;137:888–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki T, Togo Y, Yasuda K, Yamamoto H, Kokura K. [Prostate cancer in a relatively young adult: a case report]. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2008;54:139–42.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alioune S, Yaya S, Ibou T, Boubacar F, Babacar D, Ahmed FP, et al. _Early detection of prostate cancer in senegalese men 40–50 years old. Prog Urol. 2011;21(4):260–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Catalona WJ, Antenor JAV, Roehl KA, Moul JW. Screening for prostate cancer in high risk populations. J Urol. 2002;168:1980–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Varkarakis J, Pinggera G-M, Sebe P, Berger A, Bartsch G, Horninger W. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program. Urology. 2004;63:337–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perdana NR, Mochtar CA, Umbas R, Hamid ARA. The risk factors of prostate Cancer and its Prevention: A literature review. Acta Med Indones. 2016;48:228–38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rouprêt M, Fromont G, Bitker M-O, Gattegno B, Vallancien G, Cussenot O. Outcome after radical prostatectomy in young men with or without a family history of prostate cancer. Urology. 2006;67:1028–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ji G, Huang C, Song G, Xiong G, Fang D, Wang H, et al. Are the pathological characteristics of prostate Cancer more aggressive or more indolent depending upon the patient age? BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:1438027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Darré T, Djiwa T, Kpatcha TM, Sidibé A, Sewa E, Botcho G, et al. Prostate cancer screening: a survey of medical students’ knowledge in Lome, Togo, and associated determinants in a resource-limited african context. SAGE Open Med. 2021 Jul;17:9:20503121211032812.

  21. Aprikian AG, Zhang ZF, Fair WR. Prostate adenocarcinoma in men younger than 50 years. A retrospective review of 151 patients. Cancer. 1994;74:1768–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Drs Landow and Saka for correcting the mistakes.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, University Teaching Hospital of Lomé, Lomé, Togo

    Tchin Darré, Toukilnan Djiwa & Gado Napo-Koura

  2. Department of Urology, University Teaching Hospital of Lomé and Kara, Lomé, Togo

    Tchilabalo Matchonna Kpatcha & Essodina Padja

  3. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lomé, BP 1515, Lomé, Togo

    Tchin DARRE

Authors
  1. Tchin Darré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toukilnan Djiwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tchilabalo Matchonna Kpatcha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Essodina Padja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gado Napo-Koura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tchin DARRE
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TD was responsible for the conception of the study, participated in the study design, performed the laboratory analysis and interpretation, and wrote the paper. TDj, TMK, and EP were involved in the treatment and follow up of the patient; they have reviewed the paper. GNK was responsible for the overall scientific management of the study and the preparation of the final paper. All the authors have read and approved the final paper to be submitted for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tchin DARRE.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the “Comité de Bioéthique pour la Recherche en Santé (CBRS)” (Bioethics Committee for Health Research) from the Togo Ministry of Health, Ref N0: 0101/2016/MS/CAB/DGS/DPLET/CBRS). All patients and relatives of patients had received information on the purpose and procedures of this study and provided written and informed consent. The study has been carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darré, T., Djiwa, T., Kpatcha, T.M. et al. Prostate cancers in men under the age of 50: about a series in Togo, Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Cancer 22, 1341 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10425-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10425-6

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us