Skip to main content
Download PDF

IMAGENE trial: multicenter, proof-of-concept, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of niraparib with PD-1 inhibitor in solid cancer patients with homologous recombination repair genes mutation

BMC Cancer volume 22, Article number: 1292 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the potential efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) in patients with cancer involving homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutation. Moreover, HRR gene-mutated cancers are effectively treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with the increase in tumor mutation burden. We have proposed to conduct a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial (IMAGENE trial) for evaluating the efficacy and safety of niraparib (PARPi) plus programmed cell death-1 inhibitor combination therapy in patients with HRR gene-mutated cancers who are refractory to ICIs therapy using a next generation sequencing-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and tumor tissue analysis.

Methods

Key eligibility criteria for this trial includes HRR gene-mutated tumor determined by any cancer gene tests; progression after previous ICI treatment; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≤ 1. The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in all patients. The secondary endpoints include the confirmed ORR in patients with HRR gene-mutation of ctDNA using the Caris Assure (CARIS, USA). The target sample size of the IMAGENE trial is 57 patients. Biomarker analyses will be performed in parallel using the Caris Assure, proteome analysis, and T cell repertoire analysis to reveal tumor immunosurveillance in peripheral blood.

Expected outcome

Our trial aims to confirm the clinical benefit of PARPi plus ICI combination therapy in ICI-resistant patients. Furthermore, through translational research, our trial will shed light on which patients would benefit from the targeted combination therapy for patients with HRR gene-mutated tumor even after the failure of ICIs.

Trial registration

The IMAGENE trial: jRCT, Clinical trial no.: jRCT2051210120, Registered date: November 9, 2021.

Peer Review reports

Background

Homologous recombination (HR) is a multifactorial process in DNA repair involving the repair of double strand brakes (DSB) generated at the broken replication forks [1]. In particular, HR repair (HRR) genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 play a critical role in carrying out successful HR. In normal cells, DSBs are repaired by the HRR mechanism to prevent cell death. By contrast, in cells with HRR dysfunction (HR deficiency: HRD), the damage DNA accumulates because of unsuccessful DSB, eventually leading to cell death [2]. These cells rely on DNA single-strand break repair such as base exchange repair (BER) mechanisms, including Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), an enzyme required for BER to maintain genomic stability [3]. PARP inhibitors (PARPis) induce synthetic lethality in cells with HRD and consequently exhibit antitumor effects. Taking this effect into account, PARPis have undergone clinical approval for the treatment of ovarian, breast and prostate cancers involving HRR gene mutations [4,5,6,7,8,9,10].

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been introduced with the aim to improve patient outcomes as evidenced by the encouraging results of several clinical trials [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Interestingly, HRR gene mutations are found in a particular patient subset in many types of cancer, and these patients are thought to have susceptibility to ICIs because HRR gene mutations generate immunogenic cancer-antigens owing to the accumulation of somatic mutations [17]. Indeed, several studies have shown that alterations in DNA damage response and repair genes are associated with response to programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade in patients with several types of cancer [18, 19]. Considering above, we can expect synergistic effects of PARPi plus ICI combination therapy for patients with HRR-gene mutations.

The SCRUM-Japan consortium of the Nationwide Cancer Genome Screening Project with an industry-academia collaboration started the MONSTAR-SCREEN project, which evaluates the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) before and after initiating cancer treatments [20, 21]. This ctDNA assay can reveal comprehensive somatic genomic alterations that enable the assessment of predominant spatial and temporal intratumoral heterogeneity with minimal invasiveness [22]. Utilizing this platform, we propose an investigator-initiated trial (IMAGENE trial) of niraparib (PARPi) and pembrolizumab or nivolumab combination therapy for HRR gene-mutated solid cancer based on the findings of ctDNA as well as tissue genome screening in eight institutions (sample size: 57, enrollment: 1 years and 8 months).

For personalized immunotherapy, we believe this tumor-agnostic trial would create scientific breakthrough that may lead to better treatments for patients with HRR-gene mutations.

Methods

Study design and treatment

The present trial is a multicenter, single-arm, proof-of-concept (POC), phase II study. aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of niraparib plus nivolumab or pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with solid cancer involving HRR gene mutations. This study is conducted as a tumor-agnostic trial for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), metastatic esophageal cancer (mEC), metastatic head and neck cancer (mHNC), and metastatic melanoma (mMC). HRR gene mutations were determined by tumor tissue analysis including FoundationOne CDx, OncoGuide NCC oncopanel, and Caris Molecular Profiling (Fig. 1). In this study, FoundationOne liquid CDx, Guardant 360, and Caris Assure are also used to screen patients harboring HRR gene mutations using ctDNA tests in blood samples (Fig. 1). The HRR genes are defined as BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CDK12, CHEK2, PALB2, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK1, FANCL, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, and RAD54L. This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2051210120).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overall trial design. As the translational research, liquid biopsies for the IMAGENE trial will be performed at baseline, cycle 2, and after discontinuation of protocol treatment. C2; Cycle 2, mEC; metastatic esophageal cancer, mGC; metastatic gastric cancer, mHNC; metastatic head and neck cancer, mMC; metastatic melanoma, mRCC; metastatic renal cell carcinoma, mUC; metastatic urothelial carcinoma, PD-1; programmed cell death-1, PD-L1; programmed cell death ligand-1, TCR; T cell receptor

Full size image

Patients

The eligibility criteria for this trial are presented in Table 1. Key eligibility criteria include the presence of HRR gene mutated tumors determined by an analysis of the tumor tissue or blood sample; tumor progression after treatment with a previous PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of ≤ 1. All patients are enrolled in the molecular profiling study, SCRUM-Japan MONSTAR-SCREEN-2 (UMIN000043899), which incorporate a tissue (Caris Molecular Profiling) and plasma multiomics approach (Caris Assure) based on artificial intelligence. Enrollment has started on April 2022 and will be completed on August 2023.

Table 1 Eligibility criteria for the IMAGENE trial
Full size table

In addition to this clinical trial, patients who do not meet all inclusion criteria, or those meet any of the exclusion criteria are enrolled in the natural history follow-up cohort and will be observed on follow up to collect information on anti-tumor treatment, post-treatment and survival every 3 months as a historical control (SCRUM-Japan registry, UMIN000028058).

Treatments

Patients with mRCC, mGC, mEC, mHNC, and mMC will be treated with niraparib 200 mg daily and nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, whereas those with mUC will be treated with niraparib 200 mg daily and pembrolizumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients will receive therapy until reaching either disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dose of niraparib can be reduced to 200 mg daily according to adverse events during the treatment.

Endpoints and statistical analysis

The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR) confirmed by the investigators' assessment in patients with HRR genes mutation determined by any cancer gene panel. The secondary endpoints include the confirmed ORR in patients with HRR gene mutations in ctDNA determined by Caris Assure, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and change rate of tumor size, as determined by the investigators' assessment, and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Efficacy will be evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1 using computed tomography every 6 weeks until the end of cycle 12 (nivolumab) or 8 (pembrolizumab), and thereafter every 8 weeks. AEs are assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.0 before the administration of the investigational drug on the day of administration. In this trial, the threshold of the ORR has been set to 16%, and the expected rate to 31%, as niraparib combined with ICIs based on the results of previous clinical trials of ICIs. Under this assumption, with a one-sided significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, the sample size required was calculated to be 57. The sample size for each tumor was set at 15 for mUC, 4 for mRCC, 15 for mGC, 8 for mEC, 13 for mHNC and 2 for mMC, based on feasibility and the expected proportion of participants.

All analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. The baseline characteristics will be described as the mean and standard deviation, or median and quantiles (for continuous variables), or proportion (for categorical variables). The binomial test will be used to analyze the primary endpoint ORR and a threshold, and the Clopper-Pearson method will use the 95% confidence interval for ORR and DOR. Estimates of PFS, DCR, DOR, TTF, and OS will be used with the Kaplan–Meier method.

Biomarker analyses and translational research

ctDNA analysis using a targeted next-generation sequencing (Caris Assure) will be performed at baseline, Cycle 2, and after treatment discontinuation. We will also perform three types of analysis (namely, PD-L1 expression analysis, next-generation sequencing-based T cell repertoire analysis, and quantitative proteomics analysis) to investigate predictive biomarkers of response to this combination therapy. First, the expression level of PD-L1, a well-known biomarker of the clinical response to ICIs in cancer tissues, will be evaluated. Second, we will perform T cell repertoire analysis based on next-generation sequencing to determine whether T cell receptor (TCR) diversity in the peripheral blood can serve as a useful indicator of response to combination therapy. Third, we will perform a mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomic analysis using plasma to identify candidate proteins as potential predictive biomarkers.

Discussion

The introduction of next-generation sequencing technologies and large-scale tumor molecular profiling tests have revolutionized the field of precision oncology [23]. Precision oncology has already transformed cancer treatment for both common and rare malignancies that are targeted by specific therapies to improve clinical outcomes in patients. HRR gene-mutated tumor are one of the rare fractions across cancers, which are reported to be approximately 3% – 20% [24,25,26,27,28,29], and require more effective treatment beyond PARPi monotherapy. In this regard, our trial will reveal some important points for selecting patients who benefit from a PARPi in combination with ICIs as tumor-agnostic therapy.

First, our trial could first reveal the real benefit of PARPi plus ICI combination therapy for patients who are refractory to previous treatment with ICIs for a subset of HRR gene-mutated tumors. Importantly, PARPis are compatible with ICIs for three reasons: 1) PARPis upregulate PD-L1 expression in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo which is a marker for response to ICIs; 2) PARPis release DNA from cancer cells and induce T cell activation through the release of interferon-γ by the activation of the STING pathway; and 3) PARPis change the tumor microenvironment to activate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Considering these possible benefits, our trial could reveal additional effects of PARPi combined with ICI in ICIs-resistant cancers [17, 30].

Second, our trial could show whether patients with HRR gene-mutated solid tumors identified by ctDNA genotyping benefit from PARPi plus ICI similarly to patients identified by conventional tissue analysis. To date, only one study from our group has reported that pertuzumab plus trastuzumab showed similar efficacy in patients with mCRC with HER2 amplification in ctDNA and tumor tissues [31]. Considering that ctDNA may offer clinical advantages for assessing tumor heterogeneity associated with acquired resistance, our trial could contribute to the critical assessment for further use of ctDNA genotyping clinical trials.

Third, our trial results will help perform translational research to decipher the real benefit from PARPi plus ICI combination therapy and could clarify the dynamics of tumor immunosurveillance in both tissues and peripheral blood in our setting. We previously reported that peripheral TCR analysis and early ctDNA dynamics could predict clinical response to ICIs [32]. Franz et al. reported that the clinical utility of proteomic analysis may clarify the responders to PAPRi [33]. Given the additional effect of PAPRi for modulating the tumor microenvironment and cancer-specific T cells, our combined novel analysis could identify the subgroup that shows a good response to this combination therapy.

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, the IMAGENE trial is the first phase II study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and POC of combination therapy with niraparib and ICI in patients with HRR gene-mutated tumor. For precision oncology, these findings will shed light on the potential value of targeted combination therapy for patients with HRR gene-mutated tumors even after the failure of ICIs treatment.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CTCAE:

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event

ICI:

Immune checkpoint inhibitor

ORR:

Objective response rate

OS:

Overall survival

PARPi:

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor

PD-1:

Programmed cell death-1

PD-L1:

Programmed cell death ligand-1

PFS:

Progression-free survival

References

  1. Murai J, Pommier Y. PARP trapping beyond homologous recombination and platinum sensitivity in cancers. Ann Rev Cancer Biol. 2019;3:131–50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030518-055914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen L, Martens JWM, Van Hoeck A, Cuppen E. Pan-cancer landscape of homologous recombination deficiency. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5584. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19406-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas A, Murai J, Pommier Y. The evolving landscape of predictive biomarkers of response to PARP inhibitors. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:1727–30. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci120388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, Saad F, Shore N, Sandhu S, et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2091–102. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C, Friedlander M, Vergote I, Rustin G, et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1382–92. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1105535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J, Oza AM, Mahner S, Redondo A, et al. Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2154–64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pujade-Lauraine E, Ledermann JA, Selle F, Gebski V, Penson RT, Oza AM, et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1274–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30469-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzalez-Martin A, Pothuri B, Vergote I, DePont CR, Graybill W, Mirza MR, et al. Niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2391–402. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1910962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robson M, Im SA, Senkus E, Xu B, Domchek SM, Masuda N, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:523–33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1706450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Litton JK, Rugo HS, Ettl J, Hurvitz SA, Gonçalves A, Lee KH, et al. Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:753–63. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1802905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1803–13. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1510665.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellmunt J, de Wit R, Vaughn DJ, Fradet Y, Lee JL, Fong L, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1015–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613683.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang YK, Boku N, Satoh T, Ryu MH, Chao Y, Kato K, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2461–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31827-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, Okada M, Lin CY, Chin K, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1506–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30626-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, et al. Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1856–67. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weber JS, D’Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:375–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)70076-8.

  17. Yarchoan M, Johnson BA 3rd, Lutz ER, Laheru DA, Jaffee EM. Targeting neoantigens to augment antitumour immunity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:209–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Teo MY, Seier K, Ostrovnaya I, Regazzi AM, Kania BE, Moran MM, et al. Alterations in DNA damage response and repair genes as potential marker of clinical benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in advanced urothelial cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1685–94. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.75.7740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Labriola MK, Zhu J, Gupta RT, McCall S, Jackson J, Kong EF, et al. Characterization of tumor mutation burden, PD-L1 and DNA repair genes to assess relationship to immune checkpoint inhibitors response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e000319. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura Y, Fujisawa T, Taniguchi H, Bando H, Okamoto W, Tsuchihara K, et al. SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN and MONSTAR-SCREEN: Path to the realization of biomarker-guided precision oncology in advanced solid tumors. Cancer Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.15132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Taniguchi H, Nakamura Y, Kotani D, Yukami H, Mishima S, Sawada K, et al. CIRCULATE-Japan: Circulating tumor DNA-guided adaptive platform trials to refine adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2021;112:2915–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Parikh AR, Leshchiner I, Elagina L, Goyal L, Levovitz C, Siravegna G, et al. Liquid versus tissue biopsy for detecting acquired resistance and tumor heterogeneity in gastrointestinal cancers. Nat Med. 2019;25:1415–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0561-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Malone ER, Oliva M, Sabatini PJB, Stockley TL, Siu LL. Molecular profiling for precision cancer therapies. Genome Med. 2020;12:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0703-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robertson AG, Kim J, Al-Ahmadie H, Bellmunt J, Guo G, Cherniack AD, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cell. 2017;171(540–56):e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sato Y, Yoshizato T, Shiraishi Y, Maekawa S, Okuno Y, Kamura T, et al. Integrated molecular analysis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2013;45:860–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;513:202–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature. 2017;541:169–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Heeke AL, Pishvaian MJ, Lynce F, Xiu J, Brody JR, Chen WJ, et al. Prevalence of homologous recombination-related gene mutations across multiple cancer types. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2018:17. https://doi.org/10.1200/po.17.00286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim KB, Soroceanu L, de Semir D, Millis SZ, Ross J, Vosoughi E, et al. Prevalence of homologous recombination pathway gene mutations in melanoma: rationale for a new targeted therapeutic approach. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2021.01.024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Césaire M, Thariat J, Candéias SM, Stefan D, Saintigny Y, Chevalier F. Combining PARP inhibition, radiation, and immunotherapy: A possible strategy to improve the treatment of cancer? Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakamura Y, Okamoto W, Kato T, Esaki T, Kato K, Komatsu Y, et al. Circulating tumor DNA-guided treatment with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2021;27:1899–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01553-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kato T, Kiyotani K, Tomiyama E, Koh Y, Matsushita M, Hayashi Y, et al. Peripheral T cell receptor repertoire features predict durable responses to anti-PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Oncoimmunol. 2021;10:1862948. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402x.2020.1862948.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Franz A, Coscia F, Shen C, Charaoui L, Mann M, Sander C. Molecular response to PARP1 inhibition in ovarian cancer cells as determined by mass spectrometry based proteomics. J Ovarian Res. 2021;14:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00886-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the patients and their families who participated in this trial; all the co-investigators and site personnel. We also thank the clinical trial office members in the Department of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital (Yoko Kawamura, Kento Asano, and Tomoharu Dohi) and FiveRings Corporation (Harumi Sakata, Chiho Uegaki, Tatsushi Goto, and Hiroshi Miyamoto).

Funding

IMAGENE trial receives financial support from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED; grant Number, 21ck0106656h0001). Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. provides investigational drugs as well as financial support for the translational research. The funders had no role in the study design; in data collection, analysis, or interpretation; or in the writing of the report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan

    Taigo Kato & Norio Nonomura

  2. Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan

    Nobuaki Matsubara

  3. Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Masaki Shiota, Masatoshi Eto & Takahiro Osawa

  4. Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan

    Takashige Abe & Nobuo Shinohara

  5. Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    Yota Yasumizu, Nobuyuki Tanaka & Mototsugu Oya

  6. Department of Uro-Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan

    Koshiro Nishimoto

  7. Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan

    Takuji Hayashi & Masashi Nakayama

  8. Department of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center, Aichi, Japan

    Takahiro Kojima

  9. Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

    Kenjiro Namikawa

  10. Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan

    Takao Fujisawa & Susumu Okano

  11. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

    Eisuke Hida

  12. Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan

    Yoshiaki Nakamura, Hideaki Bando & Takayuki Yoshino

  13. Translational Research Support Section, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan

    Yoshiaki Nakamura & Hideaki Bando

Authors
  1. Taigo Kato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nobuaki Matsubara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masaki Shiota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masatoshi Eto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Takahiro Osawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Takashige Abe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nobuo Shinohara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yota Yasumizu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nobuyuki Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mototsugu Oya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Koshiro Nishimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Takuji Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Masashi Nakayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Takahiro Kojima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Kenjiro Namikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Takao Fujisawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Susumu Okano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Eisuke Hida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Yoshiaki Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Hideaki Bando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Takayuki Yoshino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Norio Nonomura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TK and NN participated in the entire coordinating of this trial, designed and prepared the protocol. NM, MS, ME, TO, TA, NS, YY, NT, MO, KN, TH, MN, TK, KN, TF, SO, YN, HB, and TY designed and prepared the protocol. EH is the chief statistician. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission and agreed to be accountable for the contents.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taigo Kato.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The IMAGENE trial is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Japanese Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects, and the Clinical Trial Acts in Japan. Each trial has been approved by the institutional review board of Osaka University Hospital Certified Review Board.

All patients were required to sign written informed consent.

Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2051210120).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

TK reports research funding supports from Takeda and Pfizer. NM reports honoraria from Janssen, Merck biopharma, and Sanofi and research funding supports from Janssen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Roche, MSD, Taiho, Astellas, Amgen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, PRA Health Science, Takeda, Pfizer, Seagen, Chugai, Abbvie, and Novartis. MS reports honoraria from Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Astellas and research funding support from Daiichi Sankyo. ME reports honoraria from ONO, Takeda, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol, Janssen, MSD, Merck, AstraZeneca, and Eisai and research funding support from Sanofi, Bayer, Astellas, ONO, and Takeda. TO reports honoraria from Takeda. MO reports honoraria from Bayer, Bristol, Novartis, Ono, Merck, Takeda, MSD, and Pfizer. KN reports honoraria from Ono, Novartis, MSD, and Bristol, and consulting fees from Novartis and MSD. YN reports honoraria from Chugai, Merck Biopharma, and Guardant Health AMEA, and research funding support from Taiho, Chugai, Guardant Health, Genomedia, Daiichi Sankyo, Seagen, and Roche Diagnostics. HB reports honoraria from Taiho, Ono, and Eli Lilly Japan, and research funding support from Ono. TY reports honoraria from Chugai, Merck, Bayer, Ono, and MSD, and research funding from MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono, Taiho, Amgen, Sanofi, Pfizer, Genomedia, Sysmex, Chugai, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. NN reports honoraria from Takeda, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Merck Biopharma, Ono, and Bristol.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kato, T., Matsubara, N., Shiota, M. et al. IMAGENE trial: multicenter, proof-of-concept, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of niraparib with PD-1 inhibitor in solid cancer patients with homologous recombination repair genes mutation. BMC Cancer 22, 1292 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10398-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10398-6

Keywords

  • Homologous recombination repair
  • Niraparib
  • PARP inhibitor
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor
  • Tumor-agnostic therapy

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us