Skip to main content

Long-term results of postoperative unsuspected small cell lung cancer on real-world data

Abstract

Background

In traditional opinion, solid pulmonary nodule suspected lung cancer should be confirmed by pathology before the operation to exclude small cell lung cancer (SCLC), considering SCLC tends to be aggressive and surgical effect in the management of SCLC remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival result and risk factors of postoperative unsuspected SCLC.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with postoperative unsuspected SCLC who were confirmed by pathology and referred to Chinese PLA General Hospital between 2000 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed (surgery group). Additionally, 120 patients with limited-stage SCLC who underwent chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the same period were enrolled in the chemoradiotherapy group.. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival; the Log-Rank test was used to compare survival rates between different groups; a COX stepwise regression model was used for multivariate analysis.

Results

Among 120 patients in the surgery group, 28 were with central type and other 92 with peripheral type. The median survival (OS) was 44.85 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 46%. The 5-year survival rates for stage I, II, and III were 52.1%, 45.4%, and 27.8%, respectively. The mean disease-free survival time (DFS) was 30.63 ± 4.38 months, and the 5-year DFS rate was 31.5%. In the chemoradiotherapy group, the mean OS was 21.4 ± 4.26 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 28.3%. The 5-year survival rates for clinical stage I, II, and III were 42.5%, 39.8%, and 20.5%, respectively. The mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.63 ± 3.6 months. In the surgery group, one-way ANOVA revealed that the gender, symptoms, smoking history, tumor location, and postoperative radiotherapy were not associated with OS (P ≥ 0.05), while age, surgical approach, surgical method, N stage, TNM stage, and vascular tumor thrombus were related to OS (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that the N stage was associated with OS (HR = 1.86 P = 0.042).

Conclusion

Surgery and adjuvant therapy were found to have encouraging outcomes in postoperative unsuspected SCLC. Patients with stage I, stage II and part of stage IIIA SCLC could benefit from surgery and the standard lobectomy, and systematic lymph node dissection, is also recommended for these patients.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by a high degree of malignancy, rapid progression, and poor prognosis. It is also often accompanied by mediastinal lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Hence, SCLC was previously recognized as a systemic disease. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the standard treatments for this condition, while surgery has not been acknowledged as a routine procedure [1, 2]. However, with the popularization of chest computed tomography (CT) examinations, an increasing number of lung cancers are being detected earlier than ever before. In real-world clinical practice, some patients have postoperative pathologically confirmed SCLC, known as postoperative unsuspected SCLC. Recent large-cohort studies investigating the role of surgery in SCLC patients demonstrated that surgery could provide a significant survival benefit for patients with a broader range of disease stages (I–IIIA) [3,4,5]. Nevertheless, the survival outcome and related risk factors of postoperative unsuspected SCLC remain unclear.

This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the patients with no preoperative pathological diagnosis and postoperative pathologically confirmed SCLC, their clinical characteristics, and imaging manifestations to explore the survival and risk factors that could guide the preoperative differential diagnosis of SCLC in the future.

Materials and methods

Research objects

Patients who underwent surgical treatment in the PLA General Hospital between January 2000 and June 2021 and were confirmed by pathology with postoperative unsuspected SCLC were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were the following: no severe complications during the perioperative period; survival time > 3 months after the operation. The exclusion criteria referred to patients with preoperative pathologically confirmed SCLC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

A total of 120 cases were included, and their general information and clinical data were collected. Additionally, 467 patients with limited SCLC who underwent 1st-line systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy in our hospital between January 2000 and December 2020 were enrolled in the chemoradiotherapy group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups in a 1:1 manner. Age, sex, tumor size on CT, and clinical N stage were included in PSM (Table 1).

Table 1 Patient characteristics of the surgery group versus the chemoradiotherapy group after propensity score–matched

Preoperative examination

Distant metastases were excluded based on the following examinations: routine preoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT scan, chest CT scan, enhanced chest CT scan, whole-body bone scan, ultrasound of liver, gallbladder, pancreas, spleen, adrenals, and neck and supraclavicular lymph node ultrasound. Patients with pulmonary nodules located in the hilum underwent bronchoscopy. After 2008, some patients underwent whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)-CT examination. All patients were tested for serum tumor markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA21-1), squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen (SCC), etc.

Treatment methods

All 120 patients in the surgery group underwent surgical treatment, including posterolateral thoracotomy and thoracoscopic approach. Surgical methods included wedge resection, segmentectomy, lobectomy, double lobectomy, sleeve lobectomy, and pneumonectomy. Except for mediastinal lymph node sampling in wedge resection, hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection was performed in all other procedures. Pathological staging was done based on the 7th edition of AJCC’s tumor, node, and metastases (TNM) staging criteria [6].

All patients received systemic chemotherapy after surgery, with the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens including EP (etoposide/cisplatin), EC (etoposide/carboplatin), or IP (irinotecan hydrochloride/cisplatin). Some patients received postoperative thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic whole-brain radiotherapy. Eight patients received chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, and 3 patients received chemotherapy combined with vascular-targeted therapy.

All 120 patients in the chemoradiotherapy group received chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Irradiation of the primary tumor and mediastinal lymph nodes was performed following 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The mean radiation dose was 54 Gy (30-72 Gy). After radiotherapy, 2–4 cycles of chemotherapy were administered according to patient’s tolerance. Six patients received immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.

Follow-up

The patients underwent regular outpatient re-examination after surgery every 3 months within 2 years after surgery and every 6 months thereafter. The re-examinations included brain MRI or CT scan, chest CT scan, whole-body bone scan, ultrasound of liver, gallbladder, pancreas, and spleen + adrenal gland, ultrasound of the neck and supraclavicular lymph nodes, and serum tumor markers. Besides outpatient follow-up, all patients were followed up by telephone. The last follow-up time was September 16, 2021.

The study's primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), which was defined from the date of surgery to the date of death from any cause or the date of the last follow-up. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the first therapy dose to disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from surgical tumor resection until disease recurrence, which also included patients without relapse who were censored on the date of the last follow-up or death.

Statistical analysis

Stata software (Version 15 StataCorp, TX, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Continuous variables and dichotomous variables were compared with t-test and Chi-square test, respectively. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The survival rate comparison between different groups was performed with the Log-Rank test. A COX stepwise regression model was used for multivariate analysis. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General characteristics

There were 8238 cases of lung cancer confirmed by pathology after surgery, including 8112 cases of non-SCLC and 126 cases of SCLC. SCLC accounted for 1.53% of lung cancers managed by surgical resection. As 4 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and 2 patients who lacked follow-up data were excluded, 120 patients were finally included in the study as the surgery group. Among these 120 patients, 93 were men and 27 were women, aged 35–80 years old, with an average age of 60.25 ± 9.38 years. Respiratory symptoms such as cough and blood in sputum were found in 48 patients, while the remaining 72 were asymptomatic and were incidentally diagnosed during physical examination. There were 79 patients who were smokers, 64 of whom were heavy smokers (smoking index > 600 cigarettes), while the remaining 41 patients had no smoking history. With reference to co-morbidities, 1 patient had a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, 2 had a history of thyroid cancer, and 16 had a family history of lung cancer.

Chest CT showed a central mass in 28 (23%) cases and peripheral mass in the remaining 92 (77%) cases, while there were only 2 cases with non-solid nodules. Six patients were found with accompanying nodules in the ipsilateral lung. According to the CT images, 107 (89%) cases were accompanied by lobulation, 13 (11%) cases were with no lobulation, 45 (38%) cases had smooth nodule edges, and 75 (62%) cases had blurred edges. Only 5 cases had a vacuolar sign. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy was found in 44 (37%) cases, while 78 (63%) had no obvious lymphadenopathy. Whole-body PET-CT examination was administered in 38 cases, with an average standardized uptake value (SUV) value of 8.8 ± 4.1.

Surgical and pathological staging

In the surgery group, 52 (43%) patients underwent thoracotomy and 68 (57%) patients underwent minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery. Among them, 87 (71.3%) patients underwent lobectomy, 5 underwent pneumonectomy, 6 underwent bilobectomy, and the remaining 14 underwent a sublobar resection. There were no perioperative deaths. R0 resection was achieved in 117 cases, and R1 resection was achieved in 3 cases. Pathological results showed that 109 cases were pure small cell carcinoma, 11 cases were mixed type, 4 cases were combined with large cell carcinoma, and 7 cases were combined with squamous cell carcinoma. According to the largest diameter, the tumor size was 0.8-12 cm, and the average size was 3.61 ± 1.97 cm. In addition, there were 30 cases associated with pleural invasion, 4 cases with tumor spread in the trachea, and 21 cases with intravascular tumor thrombus. Lymph node dissection was performed in 115 cases, and the number of dissected lymph nodes was 1–50, with an average of 11.9 ± 0.69. There were 61 cases of lymph node metastasis, including 40 cases of single-site metastasis and 21 cases of multi-site metastasis.

Pathological staging was as follows: 29 cases in stage IA, 10 cases in stage IB, 15 cases in stage IIA, 22 cases in stage IIB, 37 cases in stage IIIA, 5 cases in stage IIIB, and 2 cases in stage IV. In stage IV, 2 cases were found to have pleural nodules during operation, and intraoperative frozen pathology confirmed metastasis. Immunohistochemistry showed that the average Ki-67 was 75.5 ± 13.2%. There was no significant difference in pathology characteristics between the two subgroups of patients with and without a smoking history in the surgery group (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of characteristics of pathology for a subgroup of patients with and without smoking history in the surgery group

Adjuvant therapy

All 120 patients in the surgery group received 2–13 cycles of systemic chemotherapy, 44 patients received radiotherapy (11 patients in stage I, 6 patients in stage II, and 27 patients in stage III), 17 patients received prophylactic whole-brain radiotherapy, and 8 patients received thoracic radiotherapy. In addition, combination therapy of cytotoxic chemotherapy and programmed death and its ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibody immunotherapy were used in 8 patients.

Survival analysis

There were no perioperative deaths in the surgery group. The mean follow-up was 51 months, and 48 patients were still alive at the end of the follow-up. The mean overall survival time (OS) was 44.85 ± 3.85 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 46%. The 5-year survival rates for stages I, II, and IIIA were 52.1%, 45.4%, and 27.8%, respectively (Fig. 1). The mean disease-free survival time (DFS) was 30.63 ± 4.38 months, and the 5-year DFS rate was 31.5%.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of survival analysis of different pathological TNM stages

In the chemoradiotherapy group, the mean OS was 21.4 ± 4.26 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 28.3%. The 5-year survival rates for clinical stage I, II, and III were 42.5%, 39.8%, and 20.5%, respectively. The mean PFS was 10.63 ± 3.6 months (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of PFS (DFS) in the surgery group and the chemoradiotherapy group

Further analysis showed that gender, symptoms, smoking history, tumor location, and postoperative radiotherapy were not significantly associated with OS (P ≥ 0.05), while age, surgical approach, surgical method, N stage, TNM stage, and vascular tumor thrombus were related to OS of patients (P < 0.05, Table 3, Fig. 3, and Fig. 4). Earlier N and TNM stage were associated with improved DFS compared to the later stage. Lobectomy has no significant DFS benefit compared to other resections.

Table 3 Summary of DFS and OS in patients with unexpected small cell lung cancer
Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of survival analysis between lobectomy (including bilobectomy) and other procedures

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of survival analysis of different N stages

Multivariate analysis showed that the N stage was associated with OS (HR = 1.86 P = 0.042), unlike tumor location and surgical method (Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the risk factors affecting the survival of unsuspected small cell lung cancer after surgery

Discussion

SCLC is a highly malignant tumor characterized by rapid progression. The median survival time of affected patients is 17 months, while a 5-year survival rate for patients with the limited-stage disease is only 10% [7]. At present, the treatment of SCLC is mainly based on chemoradiotherapy, while the role of surgical treatment remains controversial. In the last century, two prospective trials reported that surgery was not beneficial for SCLC [1, 2]. Consequently, surgery has not been recommended as a routine approach for treating SCLC for decades. However, in the past ten years, numerous retrospective analyses based on the SEER (the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database and NCDB (National Cancer Database) have shown that surgery benefits stage I and II SCLC. Accordingly, the NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines recommended surgical treatment for T1 and T2N0 patients [3,4,5, 8,9,10,11,12]. ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology) also proposed similar guideline practices for SCLC in 2021 [13].

Patients with early-stage SCLC have no significant symptoms. In our group, 60% of the patients were incidentally diagnosed during physical examination. On chest CT imaging, peripheral SCLC has a significantly higher proportion of smooth nodules than non-small cell lung cancer, which may be related to faster tumor cell growth and fewer stromal cells [1, 14,15,16]. Therefore, paying attention to the possibility of SCLC when encountering solitary pulmonary nodules with smooth edges on a chest CT scan is necessary. Also, the differential diagnosis needs to be differentiated from sclerosing hemangioma and inflammatory pseudotumor. SCLC tends to proliferate actively. The average SUV value in this group of patients who underwent PET/CT examination was 8.8, which was higher than that of non-small cell lung cancer [17]. PET-CT also provides more accurate preoperative staging of SCLC [18, 19], which is important to make a clinical strategy.

Our results also showed that clinical early-stage SCLC (stage I-IIIA) achieved a better 5-year survival rate following surgical management. The survival analysis of this group showed that the mean OS was 44.8 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 46%, which is encouraging and consistent with the results of several previous retrospective analyses [3,4,5, 8,9,10,11, 20,21,22]. The 5-year survival rate of stage I was 52.1%, which was a favorable outcome as expected. Similarly, the very limited stage (T1-2N0M0) also obtained solid benefits from oncological resection, according to several retrospective studies [4, 8, 21, 23]. So, small peripheral tumors clinically staged as N0 are recommended for surgical resection rather than needle aspiration biopsy to exclude SCLC. Patients with stage IIIA SCLC were also found to have improved OS in the present study, which is consistent with a propensity score matching study reported by Gao et al.[22]. The results indicate that patients with selected clinical stage IIIA SCLC whose lymph nodes could be completely dissected could be recommended for indications of surgery. In this cohort, there were seven cases with advanced stage, including five with IIIB and 2 with IV. The survival rate of the advanced stage was very poor, and the 5-year survival rate was zero even though these cases were treated with surgical resection and systemic chemoradiotherapy. The 5-year survival rate in the chemoradiotherapy group was better than that previously reported [21, 24], which might be due to the higher percentage of patients in the early stage of this study.

Lobectomy is still the preferred surgical approach for early-stage SCLC, and we found a significant difference in OS between the lobectomy group and the sublobar resection and pneumonectomy groups, which is also consistent with the results of previous studies [3, 22, 25]. In addition, although the incidence of mediastinal lymph node involvement in SCLC was high, the R0 resection rate in this group was still as high as 97%, which is related to strict preoperative evaluation.

In addition to surgical approach, age, surgical method, TNM stage, N stage, and vascular tumor thrombus were associated with survival time. Among them, multivariate analysis revealed lymph node involvement to as an independent survival risk factor. Therefore, preoperative lymph node biopsy should be considered when mediastinal lymph node involvement is suspected in preoperative imaging evaluation.

All incidentally confirmed SCLC should receive systemic adjuvant therapy after surgery [26]. Although no survival benefit was observed following postoperative radiotherapy in this group, mediastinal radiotherapy and chemotherapy were recommended in patients with lymph node involvement [27, 28]. The lack of observable benefits from radiotherapy may be related to the low number of cases. Previous retrospective analyses also found no survival benefit from postoperative radiotherapy (including prophylactic whole cranial irradiation) or thoracic radiotherapy following postoperative chemotherapy [29]. Prospective studies or larger retrospective analyses are expected to confirm this aspect in the future.

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been found to improve outcomes in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [30, 31]. Anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD1) and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used in the adjuvant therapy of small cell lung cancer. Several RCTs have reported that antiangiogenic agents such as bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, also led to improved PFS in small-cell lung cancer [32, 33]. Accordingly, immunotherapy and vascular targeted therapy were combined with traditional chemotherapy in 17 patients in two groups; however, they still cannot be considered standard care for SCLC.

The present study has several limitations. First of all, this was a retrospective analysis, with the relatively small number of cases, the large time span, the different characteristics of patients, and high heterogeneous postoperative treatment. Second, the study did not include patients with limited-stage SCLC without surgery as control during the same period. The subjects were patients with SCLC who were incidentally discovered after surgery, and the indications were different from those patients with SCLC confirmed by pathology before the operation. Also, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not added. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgery may be a reasonable option for clinical N2-stage patients [34]. Despite these several limitations, the present study reflects the actual clinical outcomes of postoperative unsuspected SCLC patients.

In conclusion, this study shows that surgery and adjuvant therapy have encouraging outcomes in postoperative unsuspected SCLC. Patients with early-stage SCLC, including stage II and IIIA, can benefit from surgery, and standard lobectomy plus systematic lymph node dissection is recommended. Systemic therapy should be performed postoperatively. Future randomized controlled prospective studies are needed to confirm whether preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy can further prolong survival time and whether to perform thoracic radiotherapy after surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fox W, Scadding JG. Medical Research Council comparative trial of surgery and radiotherapy for primary treatment of small-celled or oat-celled carcinoma of bronchus. Ten-year follow-up Lancet. 1973;2:63–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(73)93260-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lad T, Piantadosi S, Thomas P, Payne D, Ruckdeschel J, Giaccone G. A prospective randomized trial to determine the benefit of surgical resection of residual disease following response of small cell lung cancer to combination chemotherapy. Chest. 1994;106:320s–3s. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.106.6_supplement.320s.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Combs SE, Hancock JG, Boffa DJ, Decker RH, Detterbeck FC, Kim AW. Bolstering the case for lobectomy in stages I, II, and IIIA small-cell lung cancer using the National Cancer Data Base. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:316–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0000000000000402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schreiber D, Rineer J, Weedon J, Vongtama D, Wortham A, Kim A, et al. Survival outcomes with the use of surgery in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should its role be re-evaluated? Cancer. 2010;116:1350–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weksler B, Nason KS, Shende M, Landreneau RJ, Pennathur A. Surgical resection should be considered for stage I and II small cell carcinoma of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:889–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vallières E, Shepherd FA, Crowley J, Van Houtte P, Postmus PE, Carney D, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals regarding the relevance of TNM in the pathologic staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:1049–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181b27799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2019. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. 2019. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/ annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2019/cancer-facts-and-figures-2019.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2020.

  8. Yang CJ, Chan DY, Shah SA, Yerokun BA, Wang XF, D’Amico TA, et al. Long-term Survival After Surgery Compared With Concurrent Chemoradiation for Node-negative Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Surg. 2018;268:1105–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakeam E, Varghese TK Jr, Leighl NB, Giuliani M, Finlayson SRG, Darling GE. Trends, practice patterns and underuse of surgery in the treatment of early stage small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;109:117–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.05.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wakeam E, Byrne JP, Darling GE, Varghese TK, Jr.Surgical Treatment for Early Small Cell Lung Cancer: Variability in Practice and Impact on Survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;104:1872-80.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.07.009

  11. Wakeam E, Acuna SA, Leighl NB, Giuliani ME, Finlayson SRG, Varghese TK, et al. Surgery Versus Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy For Early and Locally Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Survival. Lung Cancer. 2017;109:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.04.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. NCC N.NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2021 Small Cell Lung Cancer. Principles Of Surgical Resection http://guidemedlivecn/2021.

  13. Dingemans AC, Früh M, Ardizzoni A, Besse B, Faivre-Finn C, Hendriks LE, et al. Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up(). Ann Oncol. 2021;32:839–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, Roberts H, Liu G, Soghrati K, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:910–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1214726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas A, Pattanayak P, Szabo E, Pinsky P. Characteristics and Outcomes of Small Cell Lung Cancer Detected by CT Screening. Chest. 2018;154:1284–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.07.029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu L, Wei J, Teng F, Zhu Y, Xing P, Zhang J, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic analysis of 247 small cell lung cancer with limited-stage after surgery. Hum Pathol. 2021;108:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2020.11.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yilmaz Demirci N, Yilmaz Ü, Biner Uslu I, Dikmen A, Yılmaz A, Erdoğan Y.Prognostic significance of standardised uptake value (SUV(max) ) measured on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017;26doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12485

  18. Veronesi G, Bottoni E, Finocchiaro G, Alloisio M. When is surgery indicated for small-cell lung cancer? Lung Cancer. 2015;90:582–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.10.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Niho S, Fujii H, Murakami K, Nagase S, Yoh K, Goto K, et al. Detection of unsuspected distant metastases and/or regional nodes by FDG-PET [corrected] scan in apparent limited-disease small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007;57:328–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang H, Xu J, Yao F, Liang S, Zhao H. Analysis of unexpected small cell lung cancer following surgery as the primary treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:2441–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2766-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kauffmann-Guerrero D, Walter J, Kovács J, Sellmer L, Hatz RA, Behr J, et al. The Role of Thoracic Surgery in Small Cell Lung Cancer - A Large Longitudinal Analysis (2002–2015) Based on Real-World Data. Clin Lung Cancer. 2022;23:244–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2022.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao L, Shen L, Wang K, Lu S. Propensity score matched analysis for the role of surgery in stage III small cell lung cancer based on the eighth edition of the TNM classification: a population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese hospital. Lung Cancer. 2021;162:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.10.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Takei H, Kondo H, Miyaoka E, Asamura H, Yoshino I, Date H, et al. Surgery for small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 243 patients from Japanese Lung Cancer Registry in 2004. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:1140–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Takenaka T, Takenoyama M, Inamasu E, Yoshida T, Toyokawa G, Nosaki K, et al. Role of surgical resection for patients with limited disease-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2015;88:52–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.01.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Varlotto JM, Recht A, Flickinger JC, Medford-Davis LN, Dyer AM, DeCamp MM. Lobectomy leads to optimal survival in early-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:538–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang CF, Chan DY, Speicher PJ, Gulack BC, Wang X, Hartwig MG, et al. Role of Adjuvant Therapy in a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Early-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1057–64. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.63.8171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong AT, Rineer J, Schwartz D, Schreiber D. Assessing the Impact of Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Completely Resected Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Using the National Cancer Database. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:242–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2015.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wakeam E, Giuliani M, Leighl NB, Finlayson SRG, Varghese TK, Darling GE. Indications for Adjuvant Mediastinal Radiotherapy in Surgically Resected Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1647–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou N, Bott M, Park BJ, Vallières E, Wilshire CL, Yasufuku K, et al. Predictors of survival following surgical resection of limited-stage small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161:760-71.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldman JW, Dvorkin M, Chen Y, Reinmuth N, Hotta K, Trukhin D, et al. Durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, plus platinum–etoposide versus platinum–etoposide alone in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): updated results from a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2021;22:51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30539-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu SV, Reck M, Mansfield AS, Mok T, Scherpereel A, Reinmuth N, et al. Updated Overall Survival and PD-L1 Subgroup Analysis of Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide (IMpower133). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:619–30. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Spigel DR, Townley PM, Waterhouse DM, Fang L, Adiguzel I, Huang JE, et al. Randomized phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from the SALUTE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2215–22. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Neal JW, Wakelee HA. Elusive Target of Angiogenesis in Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1269–71. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.6084.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu YJ, Zheng H, Gao W, Jiang GN, Xie HK, Chen C, et al. Is neoadjuvant chemotherapy mandatory for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19:887–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivu262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients with small cell lung cancer enrolled in this study and their families for their support of this real world data.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Juntang Guo and Leilei Shen carried out the studies, participated in collecting data, and drafted the manuscript. Chaoyang Liang and Zhipeng Ren performed the statistical analysis and participated in the study design. Juntang Guo and Yang Liu participated in the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaoyang Liang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 2000 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

The study protocol had been approved by the Ethics Committee of the PLA General Hospital in October 2021. Due to the retrospective analysis, the Ethics Committee of the PLA General Hospital waived the need for individual consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, J., Shen, L., Ren, Z. et al. Long-term results of postoperative unsuspected small cell lung cancer on real-world data. BMC Cancer 22, 1256 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10341-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10341-9

Keywords

  • Lung cancer
  • SCLC
  • Surgery
  • Overall survival rate