Skip to main content

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and their impact on liver enzymes and attenuation

Abstract

Background

Immune related adverse events impacting the liver are common from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy; however, there is little data regarding the subclinical impact of ICIs on liver inflammation. The study aims to determine whether ICI therapy affects liver attenuation and liver enzymes in melanoma patients with and without hepatic steatosis.

Methods

A retrospective, cohort study was conducted of patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICI therapy who received serial PET-CT scans at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC). Primary outcomes included: liver attenuation measured by PET-CT/non-contrast CT and liver enzymes. Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed by radiologists on clinical imaging.

Results

Among 839 patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICIs, 81 had serial PET-CT scans approximately 12 months apart and long-term survival; of these 11 patients had pre-existing steatosis/steatohepatitis. Overall, ICI was not associated with significant increases in liver enzymes in all patients; modest decreases in liver enzymes were observed in patients with pre-existing steatosis/steatohepatitis. Similarly, liver attenuation did not change from baseline to post-treatment (58.44 vs 60.60 HU, + 2.17, p = 0.055).

Conclusions

ICIs may not chronically affect liver enzymes or liver attenuation, a non-invasive measure of liver fat content and inflammation, in the general population or in those with pre-existing steatosis/steatohepatitis.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have known immune related adverse effects (irAEs) that present as autoimmune-like conditions in any organ system. The liver is a commonly affected organ (0.7–16%), primarily with “immune-mediated hepatitis (IMH).” [1, 2] The pathophysiology of hepatoxicity is likely from T-cell based autoimmunity to hepatocytes, which usually resolves with corticosteroid administration [2]. These events are diagnosed and graded based on liver enzymes, and severe events require ICI discontinuation [3, 4].

Beyond overt clinical events, ICIs may produce or worsen subclinical inflammation with more long-term effects [5]. Specifically, pre-existing inflammatory disorders may be exacerbated by ICIs, including atherosclerosis, steatohepatitis, and autoimmune disorders [6,7,8,9,10]. Since the worldwide incidence of NAFLD is approximately 25%, studying the impact of ICI therapy on this condition is a key need [11]. Steatosis (fat deposition in the liver) and steatohepatitis (steatosis with inflammation) represent a complex continuum of increasing inflammation and liver damage characterized by increased uptake or decreased clearance of fatty acids, triggering pro-inflammatory cytokines and infiltration of various immune cell types. Although largely reversible, progression of steatosis may result in steatohepatitis and further progression to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma [12]. Within the context of ICIs, the blockade of the PD-1/L1 pathways has been associated not only with anti-tumor T cell responses, but with proatherogenic T-cell responses, the upregulation of genes involved in cholesterol synthesis, and a resulting increase in cellular cholesterol levels [6, 13]. Liver attenuation on CT scans is a useful adjunct in diagnosing diffuse hepatic diseases, particularly fat deposition [14]. Understanding these liver-based side effects of ICIs are necessary to better understand the risk–benefit profiles of treatment in these patients. However, challenges to studying this population include limited diagnostic assessments of disease status and the ability to follow long-term outcomes of NAFLD in patients with advanced malignancy.

Characterizing whether subclinical liver inflammation or fat deposition occurs in patients treated with ICI, or is exacerbated in patients with pre-existing steatosis/steatohepatitis has not been done. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether liver attenuation and liver enzymes were altered by ICI therapy in patients with long-term survival, and whether pre-existing steatosis/steatohepatitis worsened with ICI.

Methods

Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) melanoma database. As most CT scans are conducted with contrast, we primarily included patients with baseline and post-treatment PET-CT (non-contrast CT portion) and non-contrast CT scans. Contrasted CT scans were not used due to artifactual increases in liver attenuation. To remove confounding of cancer-progression related variables (e.g., cachexia), we included only patients with prolonged (≥ 2 year) survival and measured post-treatment BMI.

Data collection included: patient demographics, treatment characteristics, liver attenuation, and liver enzymes (Aspartate transaminase (AST), Alanine transaminase (ALT)). Baseline scans were defined as those obtained within 3 months of ICI initiation, and post-treatment as those obtained 10–12 months after ICI initiation. Absolute liver attenuation was measured in Hounsfield Units (HU) from a standardized region of interest using IDS7 PACS software (Sectra AB IDS7, 2020, version 22.1.21) on non-contrasted CT scans performed in isolation or as a component of PET-CT scans. Steatosis was defined as liver attenuation of < 40 HU as per standard definitions as measured by radiologists on the pre-treatment scan or scans during the past 24 months [15]. We identified two different cohorts of patients with pre-existing steatosis: 1) those with serial imaging as defined above (n = 11) and 2) those diagnosed as having steatosis by radiologists on pre-treatment scans but without serial non-contrasted CT imaging (n = 20). We assessed changes in liver attenuation in the first cohort, and changes in AST/ALT in both cohorts.

Continuous variables were reported with medians and frequencies (Number, %). Univariate and multivariate regression models were conducted for each primary outcome (liver attenuation, ALT, AST). Liver attenuation and liver enzyme measurements at different time points were compared with paired t-tests. Comparisons between subgroups were conducted with independent t-tests. Statistical significance for univariable tests was determined using FDR correction for multiple testing. Statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.1.1.

Results

Of 839 patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICI, 162 had at least 2-year overall survival (OS), including 81 with serial positron emission tomography (PET) or non-contrasted CT scans and 11 with pre-existing hepatic steatosis/steatohepatitis and liver metastases. Of these 81 patients with serial imaging and long-term survival, 54 were treated with single agent anti-PD-1/L1, 25 with ipilimumab and nivolumab, and 2 with ipilimumab monotherapy (Table S1). Of these, 9 patients developed IMH with treatment and 36 received steroids for any reason.

Liver attenuation

In the full cohort, there was no significant change in liver attenuation following ICI treatment (baseline vs post-treatment 58.4 vs. 60.6 HU, + 2.2, p = 0.055) with a non-significant trend toward increased attenuation/decreased fat deposition over time (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Table 1 Liver attenuation and liver enzymes by steatosis/steatohepatitis status
Fig. 1
figure 1

A Liver attenuation (HU) at baseline and post-ICI for patients with (green) and without pre-existing steatosis/steatohepatitis (blue). Black dotted line represents the overall line of best fit with an R-squared value of 0.236. Blue solid line represents the line of best fit for patients without steatosis/steatohepatitis with an R-squared value of 0.276. Green solid line represents the line of best fit for patients with steatosis/steatohepatitis with an R-squared value of 0.010. B Baseline to post-treatment liver attenuation change following ICI. Changes in liver attenuation generally follow a normal distribution, with few patients experiencing large changes. Most patients have little to no changes in liver attenuation with ICI

We then sought to determine whether high-risk groups would have greater changes with ICI treatment. Patients with baseline steatosis/steatohepatitis did not have statistically different changes in liver attenuation compared to those without these conditions (mean + 8.2 vs. + 1.2, p = 0.165), with a non-significant trend toward increased attenuation/decreased fat deposition on therapy. Unsurprisingly, these patients had lower baseline liver attenuation (46.7 vs. 60.3, p < 0.001) (Table 1). IMH during therapy (+ 4.5, p = 0.356; Table S2), any ICI-induced toxicity (+ 1.7, p = 0.296; Table S3), obesity (BMI ≥ 30) (+ 2.0, p = 0.378; Table S4), single agent therapy (+ 0.7, p = 0.579; Table S5), and steroid use (+ 1.7, p = 0.345; Table S6) were not associated with significant changes in liver attenuation from baseline to post-treatment. With the exception of single-agent vs. combination therapy, no other variable had significantly different changes in liver attenuation compared to their counterparts: IMH vs no IMH (4.5 vs. 1.9, p = 0.464), ICI-induced toxicity vs. no toxicity (1.7 vs. 2.9, p = 0.576), obese vs non-obese (2.0 vs. 2.3, p = 0.909), steroid use vs no steroid use (1.7 vs. 2.6, p = 0.694). Combination therapy, surprisingly, was associated with significant increases in liver attenuation following treatment compared with monotherapy (i.e. less fat deposition; + 5.5, p = 0.023) (Table S5). Multivariable analysis suggested that monotherapy (compared with combination) and higher baseline attenuation were associated with decreased liver attenuation whereas age, gender, obesity, steroid use, and baseline steatosis were not (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariable regression model of predictors for changes in liver attenuation and liver enzymes

Liver enzymes

To assess changes in liver enzymes, we combined the above cohort plus an additional 20 patients who were identified with baseline steatosis as diagnosed by radiologists on prior clinical imaging (n = 31 with steatosis, n = 101 total). These patients were not included in the initial analysis because they did not have serial PET-CT/non-contrast CT scans. Among the full cohort of patients, there was a significant decrease in AST from baseline to post-treatment (-4.8, p = 0.005) (Table 1). Baseline steatosis/steatohepatitis was associated with significant decreases in AST following treatment (-11.4, p = 0.018), although (unsurprisingly) higher liver enzymes at most timepoints (e.g. pre-treatment AST 37.7 vs. 23.1, p = 0.003; post-treatment AST 26.4 vs. 21.4, p = 0.014) (Table 1). ICI-induced toxicity was associated with significant decreases in AST (-5.1, p = 0.017) (Table S3). Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 vs. BMI < 30) was associated with significantly higher post-treatment ALT (28.0 vs. 19.6, p = 0.039), but no changes with therapy (-5.0, p = 0.09) (Table S4). Combination therapy was associated with significant decreases in AST (-4.8, p = 0.048) and ALT (-6.5, p = 0.007) (Table S5). Steroid use was associated with significantly lower post-treatment AST (19.8 vs. 23.9, p = 0.006) compared to no steroid use (Table S6). IMH and single-agent therapy were not associated with significant changes in liver enzymes. However, after controlling for covariates, only steroid use was associated with significant changes (decrease) in liver enzymes (Table 2).

Of the 31 patients with pre-existing steatosis, treatment included ipilimumab (n = 1), anti-PD-1 (n = 23), and ipilimumab and nivolumab (n = 7). Of these, only one patient developed IMH (3.2%), compared with 8 of 70 (11.4%) of patients lacking steatosis. This case occurred on pembrolizumab (grade 4) and resolved with high-dose steroids; no patients required mycophenolate mofetil. Ten patients had baseline liver enzymes above the upper limit of normal, potentially indicating steatohepatitis. Of note, 13 patients (42%) had transient increases in their liver enzymes during treatment of at least twice baseline, although none required steroids for resolution. Four of these patients received steroids for other reasons (pneumonitis, fevers, arthralgias, and adrenal insufficiency, respectively, the latter three only received low-dose prednisone dosed between 10-20 mg daily). Mean baseline, post-treatment, and last follow-up albumin levels were 4.3, 4.2, and 3.9 respectively. Last follow-up albumin levels were significantly decreased compared to post-treatment (-0.3, p = 0.004) and baseline albumin levels (-0.4, p < 0.001).

Discussion

This study tested the hypothesis that ICIs might induce subclinical liver inflammation or exacerbate pre-existing steatosis/potential steatohepatitis [16,17,18]. Our analysis demonstrates that ICIs do not appear to worsen (decrease) liver attenuation or liver enzymes either in the general population or in patients with pre-existing risk factors. Provocatively, most trends that we observed were in the direction of improvement, particularly in patients with risk factors such as hepatic steatosis.

The relationship between pre-existing inflammatory conditions, including obesity-associated disorders with ICIs is complex. Beyond autoimmune diseases, ICIs may potentially affect the clinical course of chronic obesity associated inflammatory conditions including atherosclerosis [5, 19, 20]. Preclinical models have suggested that ICIs exacerbate obesity-associated inflammation [21, 22].

Somewhat surprisingly, patients with pre-existing steatosis/steatohepatitis had non-statistically significant increases in liver attenuation (suggesting, if anything, less infiltration/inflammation) and decreased (improved) liver enzymes following treatment. In contrast, long-term albumin levels were significantly decreased compared following treatment, although remained within normal limits. Moreover, other risk factors such as obesity were not associated with significant changes in liver attenuation and liver enzymes. IMH was also of particular interest as inflammation mediated immunogenic microenvironments (such as steatosis/steatohepatitis) may be also associated with increased T-cell activity and immune checkpoint expression, with uncertain influences on fat deposition and irAE risk [5, 23]. However, IMH incidence was rare in patients with baseline steatosis/steatohepatitis (1 of 31 patients) and was not associated with significant changes in liver attenuation or liver enzymes. Specifically, the single patient with high-grade IMH had normalization of liver attenuation and liver enzymes following steroids and prolonged follow up. Combination therapy increases both the incidence and severity of immune related adverse events, however we observed that this regimen was associated with increased liver attenuation [24].

Our findings suggest that ICI therapy appears to have a limited impact on liver function, although larger populations are needed to rule out small, subclinical impact. While this study is too small to suggest that ICI therapy improves steatosis/steatohepatitis, this seemingly incongruous finding should be studied further. However, this is the only study to date to begin unravelling the impact of ICIs within this population. Potential clinical explanations could include lifestyle changes associated with a cancer diagnosis (improved nutrition, exercise), progression from cancer (although only long-term survivors were included), or non-hepatic toxicities causing weight loss and nutrition changes (e.g. colitis). Alternatively, biological explanations might play some role as well; polarization of culpable macrophage populations would be one highly speculative explanations [25, 26]. ICIs have been reported to impact myeloid populations in the tumor microenvironment and in the context of irAEs [27]. However, the pathogenesis of this process, even outside the context of ICI therapy, is poorly understood, and further study is needed.

Of interest to clinical management, patients with pre-existing steatosis/steatohepatitis frequently experienced transient rises in their liver enzymes, usually early on therapy. Whether this represents a therapy-specific effect or simply routine fluctuations is not clear. However, only one patient experienced high-grade IMH; the remainder resolved or stabilized with observation and continued therapy. This suggests that clinicians should likely monitor patients with steatosis/ steatohepatitis closely with low-grade liver enzyme increases, and reserve steroids for higher-grade events.

Limitations

Limitations include the single-center nature, small sample size, and inclusion of solely melanoma patients. Larger multi-institution studies are necessary to validate these findings. Further, more sensitive imaging modalities (e.g. MRI) and longer term analyses may also provide additional insights. Longer-term studies are also needed to rule out delayed progression from steatosis to steatohepatitis or cirrhosis. Finally, assessment of cytokine levels and other inflammatory markers over time would be useful in patients with NAFLD receiving ICIs.

Conclusions

ICIs were not associated with subclinical changes in liver attenuation or liver enzymes following therapy. This supports ICI use in patients with pre-existing steatosis/steatohepatitis. However, larger studies are necessary to confirm these results and to further elucidate the role of liver attenuation in ICI-induced toxicity diagnosis and management.

Availability of data and materials

We do not wish to share our data at this time. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. De Martin E, Michot JM, Papouin B, et al. Characterization of liver injury induced by cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Hepatol. 2018;68(6):1181–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHEP.2018.01.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peeraphatdit T, Wang J, Odenwald MA, Hu S, Hart J, Charlton MR. Hepatotoxicity from immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and management recommendation. Hepatology. 2020;72(1):315–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/HEP.31227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brahmer JR, Abu-Sbeih H, Ascierto PA, et al. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events. J Immunother cancer. 2021;9(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/JITC-2021-002435

  4. Patrinely JR, McGuigan B, Chandra S, et al. A multicenter characterization of hepatitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Oncoimmunology. 2021;10(1) https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2021.1875639

  5. Johnson DB, Nebhan CA, Moslehi JJ, Balko JM. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors: long-term implications of toxicity. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022. Published online January 26, 2022:1–14 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-022-00600-w

  6. Gotsman I, Grabie N, Dacosta R, Sukhova G, Sharpe A, Lichtman AH. Proatherogenic immune responses are regulated by the PD-1/PD-L pathway in mice. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(10):2974–82. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI31344.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Drobni ZD, Alvi RM, Taron J, et al. Association between immune checkpoint inhibitors with cardiovascular events and atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation. 2020;142(24):2299–311. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049981.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Halle BR, Betof Warner A, Zaman FY, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing psoriasis: safety and efficacy. J Immunother cancer. 2021;9(10) https://doi.org/10.1136/JITC-2021-003066

  9. Menzies AM, Johnson DB, Ramanujam S, et al. Anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting autoimmune disorders or major toxicity with ipilimumab. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2017;28(2):368–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/ANNONC/MDW443.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson DB, Sullivan RJ, Ott PA, et al. Ipilimumab therapy in patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting autoimmune disorders. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(2):234–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMAONCOL.2015.4368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/HEP.28431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanyal AJ, Van Natta ML, Clark J, et al. Prospective Study of Outcomes in Adults with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(17):1559–69. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA2029349/SUPPL_FILE/NEJMOA2029349_DATA-SHARING.PDF.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Strauss L, Mahmoud MAA, Weaver JD, et al. Targeted deletion of PD-1 in myeloid cells induces antitumor immunity. Sci Immunol. 2020;5(43) https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIIMMUNOL.AAY1863

  14. Bol DT, Merkle EM. Diffuse liver disease: Strategies for hepatic CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 2009;29(6):1591–614. https://doi.org/10.1148/RG.296095513/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/G09OC23G09X.JPEG.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance. Radiographics. 2004;24(6) https://doi.org/10.1148/RG.246045065/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/G04NV25G30X.JPEG

  16. Halle BR, Betof Warner A, Zaman FY, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing psoriasis: safety and efficacy. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(10): e003066. https://doi.org/10.1136/JITC-2021-003066.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tison A, Quere G, Misery L, et al. OP0196 Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune diseases: a nationwide multicenter retrospective study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl 2):147–147. https://doi.org/10.1136/ANNRHEUMDIS-2018-EULAR.5840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawada K, Hayashi H, Nakajima S, Hasebe T, Fujiya M, Okumura T. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a potential risk factor for liver injury caused by immune checkpoint inhibitor. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35(6):1042–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/JGH.14889.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Poels K, Neppelenbroek SIM, Kersten MJ, Antoni ML, Lutgens E, Seijkens TTP. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: an emerging clinical problem. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(6):2916. https://doi.org/10.1136/JITC-2021-002916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Drobni ZD, Alvi RM, Taron J, et al. Association Between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Cardiovascular Events and Atherosclerotic Plaque. Circulation. 2020;142(24):2299–311. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049981.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu B, Chiang HC, Sun X, et al. Genetic ablation of adipocyte PD-L1 reduces tumor growth but accentuates obesity-associated inflammation. J Immunother cancer. 2020;8(2) https://doi.org/10.1136/JITC-2020-000964

  22. Pingili AK, Chaib M, Sipe LM, et al. Immune checkpoint blockade reprograms systemic immune landscape and tumor microenvironment in obesity-associated breast cancer. Cell Rep. 2021;35(12) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELREP.2021.109285

  23. Kim JE, Patel K, Jackson CM. The potential for immune checkpoint modulators in cerebrovascular injury and inflammation. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2021;25(2):101–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2021.1869213.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and Ipilimumab versus Ipilimumab in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2006. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA1414428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Qiu Y, Chen T, Hu R, et al. Next frontier in tumor immunotherapy: macrophage-mediated immune evasion. Biomark Res 2021 91. 2021;9(1):1–19 https://doi.org/10.1186/S40364-021-00327-3

  26. Vitale I, Manic G, Coussens LM, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. Cell Metabolism Review Macrophages and Metabolism in the Tumor Microenvironment. Published online. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mihic-Probst D, Reinehr M, Dettwiler S, et al. The role of macrophages type 2 and T-regs in immune checkpoint inhibitor related adverse events. Immunobiology. 2020;225(5): 152009. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IMBIO.2020.152009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Financial disclosure statement

The authors have no financial interests to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Funding

No funding was received for this work. DBJ received funding from NHLBI R01 HL155990 and IT received funding from T32 NCI T32CA217834.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.C.P., D.B.J., and I.T. wrote the main manuscript text. B.C.P. prepared Tables 1– 2. A.L. and F.Y. conducted the biostatistical analyses and prepared Fig. 1. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas B. Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental protocols were approved by the Vanderbilt University institutional review board. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations or declaration of helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, B.C., Lee, A.X.T., Ye, F. et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and their impact on liver enzymes and attenuation. BMC Cancer 22, 998 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10090-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10090-9

Keywords

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • Liver attenuation
  • Steatosis
  • Steatohepatitis
  • Immune related adverse events