Skip to main content

Toripalimab combined with concurrent platinum-based Chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical Cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial



Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is currently the standard of care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. However, even with the application of modern radiotherapy techniques, a considerable number of patients still develop distant metastases. PD-L1 inhibitors show good efficacy in cervical cancer. This single-arm phase II study aims to explore the efficacy and tolerability of combining PD-L1 inhibitor with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.


The primary endpoint of the study was the objective response rate assessed according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. The inclusion criteria were previously untreated patients aged 18–75 years with stage III-IVA (FIGO 2018 staging system) locally advanced cervical cancer. During concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, the enrolled patients will receive toripalimab (240 mg) every 3 weeks. After consolidation chemotherapy, the enrolled patients will be treated with toripalimab (240 mg) once every 6 weeks until the whole treatment cycle reaches 1 year. Intensity modulated radiotherapy was used for external beam radiation, and high-dose rate brachytherapy was delivered under image-guidance. Weekly DDP (40 mg/m2) was given concurrently with radiotherapy while 6 cycles of consolidated chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus DDP) were given after radiotherapy every three weeks. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, toxicity profile, progression-free survival, and overall survival.


PD-L1 inhibitor has shown good efficacy in recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. However, there is still a lack of evidence about its combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and tolerance of this combination therapy, so as to lay the foundation for the future phase III randomized study.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.govNCT05084677. Retrospectively registered on Octorber 07, 2021.

Peer Review reports


Cervical cancer is a common malignant tumor for female worldwide. According to the latest epidemiological survey by Globocan, the incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer rank third among all female malignancies [1]. As a developing country, the incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer are still relatively high in China, and there is still a substantial increase in cervical cancer incidence in contrast to the decreasing incidence trends in developed countries. In China, an estimated 98,900 new cases and 30,500 cervical-cancer related deaths happened in 2015 [2].

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is currently the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). According to a meta-analysis of 13 studies, the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiotherapy alone improved the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate by 6% [3]. In recent years, with the development of radiotherapy and imaging techniques, the locoregional control of LACC has been greatly improved by using new technologies such as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT), and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT). Distant metastasis, on the other hand, has become the most common type of treatment failure, occurring in 24–30% at 5 years after chemoradiation and brachytherapy [4,5,6]. Therefore, LACC patients may benefit from more intensified systematic treatment.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeted at programmed death-1(PD-1)/ programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway have shown antitumor activity in multiple tumor types [7, 8]. PD-1 is a receptor mainly expressed on activated T cells. By binding to its receptor, PD-L1 mainly expressed on tumor cells, the immune response is inhibited [9]. Considering the fact that persistent infection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main cause of cervical cancer, and that the presence of virus could lead to increased production of antigens identified as strong immune stimulants, evaluating immune checkpoint inhibition as a treatment strategy in cervical cancer is of great interest [10, 11]. Besides, in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), a predominant histologic subtype accounting for approximately 80% of cervical cancer, the expression of PD-L1 is as high as 41–88%, which further provides a rationale to support the addition of immunotherapy in cervical cancer treatment [12,13,14]. In fact, there have been several prospective studies exploring the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with recurrent/ metastatic cervical cancer [15,16,17]. Results showed that the overall objective response rate (ORR) was between 12.2 and 55.6%. Pembrolizumab was therefore approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with PD-L1–positive LACC experiencing progression during or after chemotherapy.

Toripalimab is a recombinant, humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that prevents binding of PD-1 with PD-L1 and PD-L2. At present, it has received conditional approval in China for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma that has failed previous systemic therapy [18]. This study is a single arm prospective phase II clinical study aiming to explore the efficacy and tolerance of adding toripalimab simultaneously and subsequently to CCRT in patients with LACC.

The study started on January, 2021 and the duration of inclusion will be approximately 2 years.


Study design and objectives

This study is a single-institution, open-label, single-arm, prospective phase II clinical trial. The enrolled patients will receive triple modality therapy comprised of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and the duration of immunotherapy will last for 1 year. A detailed overview can be found in the study scheme (Fig. 1). The aim of this trial is to investigate the efficacy of the addition of toripalimab to the standard CCRT treatment in LACC. The primary endpoint is the ORR. Secondary endpoints are the 2-year and 3-year progression free survival (PFS) rates, 3-year OS rate and the safety of the treatment protocol evaluated by NCI CTCAE V5.0.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic illustration of the therapy and evaluation procedures. Abbreviations: EBRT: external beam radiotherapy; DDP: cisplatin; IGABT: image-guided adaptive brachytherapy; QW: once per week; Q3W: once per 3 weeks

Key eligibility criteria

The included patients are treatment-naive and diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed stage III-IVA (2018 FIOG staging system) LACC. Besides, patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 1, adequate organ function, no history of active severe comorbidities, and no history of active autoimmune disease are eligible for this trial (detailed key inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1). Whether patients received prophylactic HPV vaccines or not does not affect their enrollment, whereas patients received therapeutic HPV vaccines after diagnosis of LACC were excluded from the enrollment.

Table 1 Key eligible criteria of the trial

Pre-treatment evaluation

Detailed items of pre-treatment evaluations are shown in Table 2. Imaging evaluations of the tumor included enhanced MRI of the pelvis, ultrasonography of the abdomen and ultrasonography of cervical and supraclavicular lymph nodes. PET-CT is recommended for patients with multiple lymph node metastasis or suspected distal metastasis. Bone scan was performed for patients with bone pain or abnormally elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, and cranial MRI was performed when clinically indicated.

Table 2 Evaluation items before, during and after treatment

Statistical analysis & sample size considerations

The ORR of patients with LACC after receiving (chemo) radiotherapy is approximately 65% according to previous literature [19]. We assumed that the addition of PD-1 antibodies to traditional treatment would yield an elevation of ORR to 80%. Using the optimal design principle of Simon’s Phase II two-stage minmax design, setting unilateral α = 0.025, β = 0.2, the optimal sample size required is 87 cases [20]. 27 patients were enrolled in the first stage. If less than 19 patients achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), the trial will be terminated. If more than 19 patients achieved CR or PR, the trial would proceed to the second phase. In this phase, 60 additional patients will be included. Finally, if 64 patients reached CR or PR, it was confirmed that the treatment scheme was effective. Considering the shedding rate of 10%, 96 cases were needed.


External beam radiotherapy (EBRT)

Planning CT

All patients will be positioned in prone position. In order to reduce the irradiation to bowels and bladder, all patients need to fast for at least 4 hours before simulation and before each radiotherapy fraction. Patients should take 500 ml water containing contrast agent orally 1 h before positioning to fill the bladder and to visualize the small intestine (contrast agent is omitted before daily irradiation). The patient is lying prone on a belly board, with both hands stretched forward and fixed by a thermoplastic body film. A contrast enhanced CT of the pelvis will be scanned and the slice thickness is set at 5 mm.


The gross tumor volume (GTV) is defined as the macroscopic primary tumor. The GTV will be comprehensively determined by all available imaging resources (physical examination, colposcopy, CT- abdomen/pelvis, MRI-pelvis, PET-CT, etc.).

The metastatic regional node (GTVnd) is defined as any lymph node that can be diagnosed as or highly suspected of metastasis using all available imaging methods.

The clinical target volume (CTV) includes the primary cervical tumor, cervix, uterus, upper half vagina, parametria, and pelvic lymph node regions (obturator, internal, external, common iliac and pre-sacral). Upper half vagina should be included in CTV for patients with no or minimal vaginal extension, upper two-thirds vagina for patients with upper vaginal involvement and the entire vagina for patients with extensive vaginal involvement. For patients with extensive pelvic node involvement /common iliac/ para-aortic lymph node involvement, CTV including the para-aortic lymph node up to the level of the renal vessels is recommended.

The planning metastatic regional node volume (PGTVnd) is defined as an expansion of 7 mm of the GTVnd, and the planning target volume (PTV) is derived from CTV plus a uniform 7 mm margin. Rectum, colon, small intestine, bladder, both femoral heads and pelvic bone will be contoured as organ at risk (OAR).

Dose prescription and irradiation

For patients without clinical positive lymph nodes, the prescription to 95% PTV is 45.0–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions, 1.8 Gy per fraction, 1 fraction per day, 5 days per week. For patients with clinical positive or highly-suspected positive lymph nodes, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) will be used. The prescription to 95% PTV is still 45.0–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions, 1.8 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction/day, 5 days/week, while 95% PGTVnd will be boosted to 53.50–59.92 Gy simultaneously in 25–28 fractions, 2.14 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction/day, 5 days/week. EBRT techniques include IMRT, volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and Helical Tomotherapy (TOMO). Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is realized by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). For patients receiving IMRT or VMAT, CBCT is performed daily in the first week and weekly afterwards. For patients treated by TOMO (TomoTherapy Inc., Madison WI) or Halcyon accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA), CBCT is performed before each fraction. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans were generated by the Pinnacle (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) or Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) treatment planning system. Irradiation was delivered with 6-MV photon energy. Dose coverage required that 95% of PTVs / PGTVnds receive the prescribed dose.

Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT)

IGABT was performed using a high-dose rate (HDR) after- loading system (Flexitron, Elekta). Pelvic CT/MRI was scanned during each fraction and target structures (residual tumor; high-risk and intermediate-risk CTV; and organs at risk) were delineated on transverse section images according to recommendations from GEC-ESTRO and International Committee on Radiation Units (ICRU) [21, 22]. Applicators were CT/MRI-compatible intracavitary intrauterine tandems and ovoids (Elekta). Interstitial needles were used for patients with more advanced disease at diagnosis or with extensive residual tumor in the middle of CCRT. Treatment planning was performed using OncCentra (Elekta). Brachytherapy dose was 28 Gy in four fractions of 7 Gy specified at 100% isodose around the high-risk CTV.

Dose constraints

Small intestines, colon, rectum, bladder and femoral heads should be contoured on the simulation images as OARs. Bowels should be contoured at least 2 cm superior and inferior to PTV. OARs such as bladder and femoral heads should be delineated from top to bottom.

The volume of femoral head receiving 50Gy or more should not exceed 5% of the total volume (V50 < 5%). Other dose constraints to OARs include a maximal dose of 75 Gy to the maximally exposed 2 cm3 of rectum and sigmoid (D2cc sigmoid & D2cc rectum ≤75 Gy), and 85 Gy to the D2cc of the bladder (α/β = 3 Gy) in EqD2 (D2cc bladder ≤85 Gy).


During radiotherapy, cisplatin (40 mg/m2) will be used once a week for 4 to 6 weeks. After radiotherapy, six cycles of consolidated chemotherapy will be carried out as follows: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 infused intravenously (i.v.) on day 2–4. Prophylactic antiemetic, acid-suppressive, liver-protection and nutritional supportive drugs will be routinely infused during every cycle of chemotherapy. Any anti-tumor cytotoxic drugs, targeted drugs or research drugs not included in this protocol will not be accepted.


Toripalimab is given concurrently with and sequentially after CCRT. During CCRT, two cycles of 240 mg toripalimab are given intravenously once every three weeks. After CCRT, six cycles of 240 mg toripalimab are given concurrently with consolidated chemotherapy once every three weeks. After that, 240 mg toripalimab will be given once every six weeks until the whole treatment period reached one year since the beginning.

Toxicity & dose modifications

Toxicity will be evaluated using the International Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events of the National Cancer Institute (NCI CTCAE), Version 5 during and after treatment. For chemotherapeutic drugs, if grade IV neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leucopenia or grade III neutropenia with fever occurs, the dose of next cycle will be reduced by 20%. If the hematological toxicity has not recovered to grade 0 ~ I before next cycle after dose-reduction, the chemotherapy will be suspended; if the hematological toxicity recovers to grade 0 ~ I, the chemotherapy will be given by the original dosage. If grade IV non-hematological toxicity occurs, chemotherapy will be discontinued. For any side effects occurring during and after chemoradiation, the principal investigator should determine whether it is immunotherapy-related adverse event (irAE). The principles for handling irAEs are shown in the following Table 3:

Table 3 Recommended dose adjustments for toripalimab

Assessment of efficacy & follow-up

Efficacy evaluation will be conducted during and after treatment. Detailed evaluation items are listed in Table 1. Mid-treatment evaluation is carried out at the end of EBRT, mainly including physical examination, pelvic MRI and HPV testing. The main purpose of this evaluation is to better determine the method of brachytherapy (intracavity or interstitial). Major efficacy evaluation will be conducted 1 month after chemoradiation (3 months since the beginning of radiotherapy), which includes comprehensive imaging examination and blood tests (Table 1). Such evaluation will also be conducted every 3 months within 2 years of treatment, every 6 months within 3–5 years, and yearly after 5 years of treatment. CR, PR, stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) will be defined for the target and non-target lesions at each follow-up according to the RECIST 1.1 -criteria. Patients suspected of disease recurrence / metastasis by routine examination will receive further examinations (PET-CT, histological examination, etc.).

OS time is defined as the time interval between the diagnosis of the disease and death for any cause. PFS time is defined as the time interval between the diagnosis of the disease and progression at any site or death for any cause.


Considering the high expression of PD-L1 in cervical cancer compared with other cancers, the application prospect of PD-L1 inhibitor in cervical cancer is promising. In the recently published Keynote-826 study, adding pembrolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy has improved both PFS and OS rates of patients with persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer [23]. Toripalimab also showed promising efficacy in melanoma, urothelial cancer, renal cell cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer and multiple solid tumors [18, 24,25,26]. Therefore, exploring the combination of PD-L1 inhibitors and CCRT in the treatment of LACC has become a hot spot in recent research. Several prospective phase II / III studies exploring this aspect are being carried out simultaneously with our research, among which Keynote-A18 (NCT04221945) is the largest ongoing randomized phase III clinical trial comparing CCRT with or without pembrolizumab for the treatment of LACC. In addition, several smaller-size randomized studies have investigated the application of PD-L1 inhibitors as maintenance treatment following CCRT in cervical cancer (NCT02635360, NCT03833479, [27]. Another single-arm phase I trial explored the safety and side effects of simultaneous toripalimab during CCRT in cervical cancer (NCT04368273). Compared with the above studies, patients enrolled in our study had more advanced disease and lower heterogeneity. Most of the staging criteria for the above studies were stage IB3-IVA, while the patients enrolled in our study were limited to stage III-IVA (2018 FIGO staging system). By doing so, we could provide more experience on the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with CCRT for patients with more advanced cervical cancer, and also lay a foundation for future randomized phase III trials.

Another highlight of this study is the application of advanced radiation and imaging techniques. All enrolled patients will receive intensity-modulated EBRT and IGABT. For patients with positive lymph nodes, we will further apply SIB-IMRT to give simultaneous boost to metastatic lymph nodes. At present, the experience of applying SIB-IMRT in the treatment of LACC is relatively limited, and most of the published literature focused on the application of SIB-IMRT in the scenario of CCRT [28,29,30]. According to the two largest retrospective studies (including 74 and 75 patients respectively) so far, SIB-IMRT has shown promising oncological outcomes and low toxicities in patients with LACC. 75 patients from EMBRACE study received a median nodal boost dose of 62 Gy EQD2, only six patients recurred in boosted nodes with a median follow up of 30 months [30]. Jayatilakebanda, et al. delivered a total dose of 60 Gy in 25 fractions to radiologically abnormal pelvic nodes by SIB technique and found no increase in toxicity compared to node negative patients [29]. Based on these results, we adopted SIB-IMRT technique in our trial and designed a 53.50–59.92 Gy /25–28 fractions boost protocol. To the best of our knowledge, our research will be the first batch of clinical trials combining immunotherapy with advanced radiotherapy techniques in cervical cancer.

All enrolled patients will receive six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus cisplatin) after CCRT. The value of adding adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) to CCRT in the treatment of LACC is controversial. Siriwan et al. has conducted a prospective randomized trial on this issue. The results showed that compared with CCRT group, significant decrease of systemic recurrences was observed in the ACT group [31]. In another randomized phase III clinical trial conducted by Duenas-Gonzalez, et al., gemcitabine plus cisplatin CCRT followed by BCT and adjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy improved both OS (log-rank P = 0.0224; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95) and PFS (log-rank P = 0 .0227; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95) compared with standard treatment [32]. In addition, further analysis of Duenas-Gonzalez’s study found that stage III/IVA patients with higher tumor load benefited more significantly [33]. These findings provide a basis for adding ACT to CCRT in the treatment of LACC.

To conclude, our study aims to explore the effectiveness and tolerance of the combination of CCRT and immunotherapy in the treatment of LACC while applying advanced radiotherapy and imaging techniques. The results of this study will provide valuable reference for future follow-up research.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable – data collection is still ongoing.


  1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:1941–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vale C, Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Brady M, Dinshaw K, Jakobsen A, et al. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of Chemoradiotherapy for cervical Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5802–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi R, Yamashita H, Okuma K, Ohtomo K, Nakagawa K. Details of recurrence sites after definitive radiation therapy for cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016;27:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Horeweg N, Creutzberg CL, Rijkmans EC, Laman MS, Velema LA, Coen VLMA, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29:257–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan L-T, Pötter R, Sturdza A, Fokdal L, Haie-Meder C, Schmid M, et al. Change in patterns of failure after image-guided brachytherapy for cervical Cancer: analysis from the RetroEMBRACE study. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2019;104:895–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, et al. Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in stage III non–small-cell lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1919–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang J, Xu J, Chen Y, Zhuang W, Zhang Y, Chen Z, et al. Camrelizumab versus investigator’s choice of chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCORT): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:832–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:677–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin Y, Ekmekcioglu S, Forget M-A, Szekvolgyi L, Hwu P, Grimm EA, et al. Cervical Cancer Neoantigen landscape and immune activity is associated with human papillomavirus master regulators. Front Immunol. 2017;8:JUN:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tashiro H, Brenner MK. Immunotherapy against cancer-related viruses. Cell Res. 2017;27:59–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mezache L, Paniccia B, Nyinawabera A, Nuovo GJ. Enhanced expression of PD L1 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancers. Mod Pathol. 2015;28:1594–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Enwere EK, Kornaga EN, Dean M, Koulis TA, Phan T, Kalantarian M, et al. Expression of PD-L1 and presence of CD8-positive T cells in pre-treatment specimens of locally advanced cervical cancer. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:577–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rotman J, den OLAS, Bleeker MCG, Samuels SS, Heeren AM, Roemer MGM, et al. PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in cervical Cancer. Regulation and Biomarker Potential Front Immunol. 2020;11:1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chung HC, Ros W, Delord J-P, Perets R, Italiano A, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Efficacy and safety of Pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical Cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1470–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Naumann RW, Hollebecque A, Meyer T, Devlin M-J, Oaknin A, Kerger J, et al. Safety and efficacy of Nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic cervical, vaginal, or vulvar carcinoma: results from the phase I/II CheckMate 358 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:2825–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lan C, Shen J, Wang Y, Li J, Liu Z, He M, et al. Camrelizumab plus Apatinib in patients with advanced cervical Cancer (CLAP): a multicenter, open-label, single-arm. Phase II Trial J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4095–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Keam SJ. Toripalimab: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2019;79:573–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Z, Yang S, Liu L, Han S. A comparison of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy in Chinese patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a multi-center study. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haie-Meder C, Pötter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO working group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol. 2005;74:235–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sturdza A, Pötter R, Fokdal LU, Haie-Meder C, Tan LT, Mazeron R, et al. Image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: improved pelvic control and survival in RetroEMBRACE, a multicenter cohort study. Radiother Oncol. 2016;120:428–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Colombo N, Dubot C, Lorusso D, Caceres MV, Hasegawa K, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Pembrolizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1856–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang B, Yan X, Sheng X, Si L, Cui C, Kong Y, et al. Safety and clinical activity with an anti-PD-1 antibody JS001 in advanced melanoma or urologic cancer patients. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu R, Wang FH, Feng FJ, Li Q, Xu N, Hu XC, et al. Recombinant humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (JS001) in patients with refractory/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: preliminary results of an open-label phase II clinical study. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:viii409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang F-H, Ren C, Zhang Y, Yao S, Feng H, Wu H, et al. Phase Ia study of a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (JS001) in Chinese patients with refractory solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:v420–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Garcia-Duran C, Grau F, Villacampa G, Oaknin A. ATOMICC trial: a randomized, open-label, phase II trial of anti-PD1, dostarlimab, as maintenance therapy for patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer after chemoradiation. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;ijgc:2022–003370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dang Y-Z, Li P, Li J-P, Zhang Y, Zhao L-N, Li W-W, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of IMRT-based simultaneous integrated boost for the definitive Management of Positive Lymph Nodes in patients with cervical Cancer. J Cancer. 2019;10:1103–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jayatilakebanda I, Tsang YM, Hoskin P. High dose simultaneous integrated boost for node positive cervical cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16:92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramlov A, Kroon PS, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, De Leeuw AAC, Gormsen LC, Fokdal LU, et al. Impact of radiation dose and standardized uptake value of (18) FDG PET on nodal control in locally advanced cervical cancer. Acta Oncol (Madr). 2015;54:1567–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tangjitgamol S, Tharavichitkul E, Tovanabutra C, Rongsriyam K, Asakij T, Paengchit K, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing concurrent chemoradiation versus concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: ACTLACC trial. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dueñas-González A, Zarbá JJ, Patel F, Alcedo JC, Beslija S, Casanova L, et al. Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1678–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dueňas-González A, Orlando M, Zhou Y, Quinlivan M, Barraclough H. Efficacy in high burden locally advanced cervical cancer with concurrent gemcitabine and cisplatin chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin: prognostic and predictive factors and the impact of disease stage on outcomes from a prospective. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:334–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We owe thanks to the patients in our study and their family members.


IThe Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (Grant No. 20JCYBJC00090). National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82172674). The funding source has no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the current study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ZYY made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and gave final approval of the version to be published; JC made contributions to the design of the study, gave substantial contributions to the organization of this trial and revised the article critically; CL draft the manuscript; YJC participated in designing and conducting the study; LZ, BLZ, JQY, HLH, JW made substantial contribution to the delivery of this study and are currently involved in study implementation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyong Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable. No individual person’s data which can identify a person is included in this manuscript.

Competing interests

Jie Chen reports receive research sponsorship from Shanghai Junshi Biosciences Co., Ltd. (TopAlliance, Shanghai, China). The other authors report no conflicts related to the current manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Li, C., Cao, Y. et al. Toripalimab combined with concurrent platinum-based Chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical Cancer: an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial. BMC Cancer 22, 793 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Cervical cancer
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Immunotherapy
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor
  • PD-L1 inhibitor
  • Toripalimab