Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Biomechanical modelling of the pelvic system: improving the accuracy of the location of neoplasms in MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy

Original Submission
25 Jun 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Sep 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Nov 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Fortuny
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Fortuny
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Fortuny
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Fortuny
Resubmission - Version 7
10 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
24 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marco Oderda
16 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Fortuny
Resubmission - Version 8
16 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
23 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Gerard Fortuny
Resubmission - Version 9
2 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 9
13 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
20 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marco Oderda
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
21 Mar 2022 Editorially accepted
28 Mar 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12885-022-09432-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page