Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comprehensive analysis of lymph nodes metastasis associated genes in cervical cancer and its significance in treatment and prognosis

BMC Cancer volume 21, Article number: 1230 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cervical carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors of the female reproductive system. Lymph nodes metastasis, the most common metastasis, which can be detected even in small-size tumor patients, results in worse prognosis. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore novel lymph nodes metastasis associated biomarkers, which can predict the prognosis and provide a good reference for clinical decision making in cervical carcinoma patients. However, systematic and comprehensive studies related to the key molecules in lymph node metastasis in cervical carcinoma patients are still absent.

Methods

Transcriptome and clinical data of 307 cervical carcinoma patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Then, survival of patients with and without lymph node metastasis was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves. Differential expressed genes (DEGs) were detected between tumor and control samples using limma package and defined as lymph node metastasis related genes. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out to screen robust prognostic gene signature. The risk score model and nomogram for predicting survival were constructed based on prognostic gene signature. The performance of the risk score model was evaluated by operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Based on risk score, patients were divided into low- and high- risk groups. DEGs, functional enrichment analysis and tumor microenvironment (immune infiltration and expressions of immune checkpoints) were detected in low- and high-risk groups.

Results

A total of 103 lymph node metastasis-associated genes were identified. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified TEKT2, LPIN2, FABP4 and CXCL2 as prognostic gene signature. The risk score model was constructed and validated in cervical carcinoma patients. 345 DEGs identified between high- and low-risk groups were significantly enriched into immune-related biological processes. Furthermore, we found that the immune infiltration and expressions of immune checkpoints were significantly different between low- and high-risk groups.

Conclusion

Our study revealed that lymph node metastasis played an important role in the prognosis of cervical carcinoma patients. Furthermore, we established a risk score model based on lymph node metastasis related genes, which could accurately predict the survival of cervical carcinoma patients. Besides, our findings in tumor microenvironments of low- and high-risk groups improved our understanding of the relationship between lymph node metastasis related genes and cervical carcinoma.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Uterine cervical cancer is a quite common female malignancy after thyroid cancer, with increasing trend of mortality in young females [1]. Importantly, a lot of cervical cancer patients may suffer from unpredicted risk of recurrence, metastasis and death. In clinical practice, surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are applied for patients at different clinical stages. Unfortunately, the prognosis of some patients remain poor even after standard treatment [2], indicating the complicated etiology of cervical cancer. Therefore, prognosis associated factors and biomarkers are urgently needed for better clinical practice.

Lymph nodes metastasis is the most common phenomenon in cervical cancer metastasis and is an independent factor for poor prognosis of cervical cancer. Moreover, the staging system of cervical cancer have been revised based on lymph nodes metastasis in 2018 [3]. In our previous study, we confirmed that lymph nodes metastasis was significantly associated with the up-regulation of immune biomarkers. Mechanisms contributing to lymph nodes metastasis is very complex. Signal transduction by protein interaction and metabolism reprogramming may be involved in this process [4]. Therefore, comprehensive study on lymph nodes metastasis in cervical cancer using bioinformatic strategy will provide better understanding of this phenomenon and lead to the identification of promising biomarkers in predicting the prognosis of cervical cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Data collections based on TCGA

The RNA-seq profile and clinical information of 307 cervical carcinoma patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) website (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). The GTF annotation file was downloaded from the Ensembl Genome Browser (http://asia.ensembl.org/index.html) to convert the Ensembl gene ID into the gene symbol and extract the mRNA profile.

Survival analysis of patients with and without lymph node metastases

Patients (n = 172) with cervical carcinoma were divided into non-lymph node metastasis (N0) and lymph node metastasis (N1) groups according to the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis after excluding patients with survival time less than 30 days and no information on lymph node metastases (Nx). Among these patients, 104 received radiotherapy, 84 received drug therapy and 107 received a combination of radiotherapy and drug therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to compare the overall survival (OS) of cervical carcinoma patients in the N0 and N1 groups via R package ‘survival’.

Differentially expressed genes

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which were defined as lymph node metastasis related genes, were identified between N0 and N1 groups with the threshold of absolute log2-fold-change (FC) more than 0.5 and p values less than 0.05 with R package ‘limma’. And the volcano plot and heatmap were used to demonstrate the gene expression patterns using R package ‘ggplot’ and ‘pheatmap’, respectively.

Construction of the risk score model based on lymph node metastases associated prognostic signature

Cervical carcinoma patients were divided into a training set and a validation set in a ratio of 7:3, and the training set was used to construct a lymph node metastasis associated prognostic signature. The univariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen the genes significantly correlated with prognosis, and a forest plot was drawn via R package ‘survival’. Then, the genes with p value less than 0.05 were used to perform the multivariate Cox regression analysis to obtain robust gene signature (p < 0.05). We then calculated the risk score of each sample based on the expressions and regression coefficients of gene signature. The median risk score of all samples was used as the cut-off value to divide the patients into high- and low- risk groups.

Assessment and validation of the risk score model based on lymph node metastases associated prognostic signature

Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the overall survival (OS) between high- and low- risk cervical carcinoma patients. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the sensitivity and accuracy of the risk score in predicting the OS of cervical carcinoma patients. At the same time, the same methods were carried out in the validation set to verify the replicability and stability of the lymph node metastases associated prognostic signature.

Identification of independent prognostic factors in cervical carcinoma

In order to investigate the independent prognostic factor in cervical carcinoma, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to evaluate the prognostic capability of risk score, age and N stage. And the factor with p value less than 0.05 was used as an independent prognostic factor for patients with cervical carcinoma.

Construction and validation of nomogram for predicting survival

For the effective clinical application of the risk score, the nomogram for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of cervical carcinoma patients was constructed using R package ‘rms’.

Functional enrichment analysis for high- and low- risk groups

Firstly, the DEGs were identified between the high- and low- risk groups using R package ‘limma’. The threshold value for DEGs screening was set to the absolute value of Log2FC more than 1 and p values less than 0.05. Next, the Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed to predict the the function of DEGs via R package ‘clusterProfiler’. The selection criterion for pathway enrichment results were P values less than 0.05.

Immune cell infiltration

CIBERSORT deconvolution algorithm was used to accurately determine the infiltration of 22 immune cells in cervical carcinoma samples. The immune cell subtypes were characterized and quantified using gene expression signatures (LM22 files) which downloaded from the CIBERSORT website. And the samples with p values less than 0.05 were filtered.

Statistical analysis

In our studies, all statistical analyses were performed in R (version 4.0.3), and p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare differences between two groups. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare differences among multiple groups. Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed to calculate correlations among immune cells and correlations among gene signature and differentially distributed immune cells.

Results

Cervical carcinoma patients with non-lymph node metastases had a better prognosis

The corresponding clinicopathological characteristics of patients included in this analysis were summarized in Table 1. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses results showed that patients with non-lymph node metastases (N0) enjoy significantly better prognosis than patients with lymph node metastases (N1) (P = 0.011, Fig. 1A). In addition, patients with N0 who received radiotherapy or a combination of radiotherapy and drug therapy had a significantly better prognosis than those with N1 (P < 0.05, Fig. 1B and C), while there was no significant difference between patients in N1 and N0 patients who received drug therapy only (P = 0.103, Fig. 1D) regarding to prognosis. We found that no significant difference among patients treated by different therapies in either N0 or N1 groups (P > 0.05, Fig. 1E and F) regarding to prognosis. These results indicated that lymph node metastasis was significantly correlated with patients’ survival. Thus, lymph node metastasis-related genes might serve as prognostic biomarkers for patients with cervical carcinoma.

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients included in this analysis
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Survival analyses in selected cohorts. A K-M analysis of non-lymph node metastasis and lymph node metastasis groups; B K-M analysis of non-lymph node metastasis and lymph node metastasis patients treated by radiotherapy; C K-M analysis of non-lymph node metastasis and lymph node metastasis patients treated by radiotherapy and drug therapy; D K-M analysis of radiotherapy patients treated by drug therapy; E K-M analysis of patients with non-lymph nodes metastasis treated by different therapies; F K-M analysis of patients with lymph nodes metastasis treated by different therapies

Full size image

Identification of 103 lymph node metastasis-related genes

Thereafter, we identified a total of 103 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 33 up-regulated DEGs and 70 down-regulated DEGs (Supplementary Table S1). The DEGs were visualized by volcano plot, with red solid dots representing up-regulation genes, blue solid dots representing down-regulation genes and grey solid dots representing genes that are not significantly different (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, 33 up-regulated genes and top 50 down-regulated genes in each sample were shown in the heatmap (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Identification of Lymph node metastasis-related genes. A DEGs between non-lymph node metastasis (N0) and lymph node metastasis (N1) groups were shown in the volcano plot. B 33 up-regulated and top 50 down-regulated genes were shown in the heatmap

Full size image

Construction of the risk score model based on four lymph node metastasis-associated genes

A total of 120 cervical carcinoma patients in TCGA were used to construct the prognostic signature. We found that 11 genes (CXCL2, SERPINB5, THBD, LPIN2, PTP4A1, FABP4, TEKT2, BCL2L10, ME1, IRX4, and SDC1) were significantly associated with survival in patients with cervical carcinoma according to the results of univariate Cox regression analysis of 103 DEGs (Supplementary Table S2, P < 0.05). Then, further multivariate Cox regression analysis identified LPIN2, TEKT2, CXCL2, and FABP4 as gene signature to construct the risk score model (Supplementary Table S3, Fig. 3A). Subsequently, the risk score of each sample was calculated based on the expression and regression coefficient of genes acquired from the multivariate Cox regression analysis as following: Risk score = (− 0.8468 × expression level of LPIN2) + (− 0.8232 × expression level of TEKT2) + (0.7068 × expression level of CXCL2) + (0.1906 × expression level of FABP4). Thereafter, we divided the patients into high- and low- risk groups according to the median of risk score and plotted the risk curve (Fig. 3B). Corresponding to the risk curve, more dead patients were observed while risk score increasing (Fig. 3C). And the gene expression heatmap showed that FABP4 and CXCL2 were up-regulated in high-risk group while LPIN2 and TEKT2 were down-regulated (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated that patients in the high-risk group have worse prognosis (P = 2.012e-04, Fig. 3E), and the ROC revealed a strong confidence of the risk score model in predicting survival of cervical carcinoma patients and the AUCs for predicting 1, 3, and 5-year survival were 0.972, 0.839, and 0.821, respectively (Fig. 3F). The result of Harrels c-index measure showed that the index values before and after correction were 0.520 and 0.509 respectively (Table 2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Construction of the risk score model in the training set. A Four lymph node metastasis-associated genes were identified in multivariate Cox regression analysis; B Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the median of the risk score; C More dead patients were observed with higher risk score; D Heatmap showed the expressions of prognostic gene signature in high- and low-risk groups. E K-M analysis of high- and low-risk groups F-H ROC curves of 1-, 3- and 5-year survival prediction of cervical carcinoma patients

Full size image
Table 2 The c-index value in the training set and testing set
Full size table

Validation of the risk score model

We further validated the risk model in 51 patients from internal validation set. Similarly, patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups according to the median of risk score (Fig. 4A). At the same time, the expression trends of FABP4, CXCL2, LPIN2 and TEKT2 were consistent with results observed in the training set (Fig. 4B). In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients in high-risk group also had worse prognosis than those in low-risk group (P = 6.101e-03, Fig. 4C). The AUCs of ROC curves for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year survival of cervical carcinoma patients in the validation set were 0.86, 0.748, and 0.748 (Fig. 4D-F). These results indicated that the risk score model had high accuracy in predicting survival of cervical carcinoma patients.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Validation of the risk score model in the validation set. A. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the median of the risk score; B. Heatmap showed the expressions of prognostic gene signature in high- and low-risk groups. C K-M analysis of high- and low-risk groups; D-F ROC curves of 1-, 3- and 5-year survival prediction of cervical carcinoma patients

Full size image

The relationship among the risk score and clinical characteristics

Furthermore, we investigated the relationship among the risk score and clinical characteristics. We found that there was no significant difference of risk score among groups divided by age, M stage, T stage and FIGO stage (P > 0.05, Fig. 5A). K-M curves showed that patients in high risk group with clinical features including age > 50, age ≤ 50, N0, Stage I, and T1 had a worse prognosis than those in low-risk group (P < 0.05, Fig. 5B), while there was no significant difference in prognosis between patients in low- and high-risk groups characterized by N1, Stage II, and T2 clinical features (P > 0.05, Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Association between the risk signature and clinical characteristics. A. Comparison of risk scores among subgroups divided by age, M stage, T stage and FIGO stage. B. K-M analysis of high- and low-risk groups under different clinical features

Full size image

Risk score is an independent prognostic predictor of survival in patients with cervical carcinoma

Then, we investigated whether the risk score was an independent prognostic factor in cervical carcinoma. Firstly, we included risk score, age, T stage, N stage, FIGO stage grade and treatment to conduct univariate Cox regression analysis in the training set. We found that the risk score was significantly associated with prognosis (P < 0.001, Fig. 6A). Further multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the risk score remained strongly associated with prognosis (P < 0.001, Fig. 6B), revealing that the risk score was an independent prognostic factor in cervical carcinoma. Similar results were obtained in the validation set (Fig. 6C and D). Next, we constructed a nomogram based on the risk score to predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year survival of cervical carcinoma patients (Fig. 6E).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Construction of the nomogram. A-B Risk score is a independent prognosis factor in both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses in training set. C-D Risk score is a independent prognosis factor in both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses in validation set. E Nomogram for survival prediction in cervical carcinoma

Full size image

Lymph node metastasis-related genes may regulate cervical carcinoma via immune-related biological processes

We further explored the mechanisms underlying the differences in survival between high- and low- risk groups. A total of 345 DEGs were identified with |log2(fold change)| > 1 and P value < 0.05 (Supplementary Table S4, Fig. 7A, B). Then, GO enrichment analysis including biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions, were performed to analyze the biological functions of these DEGs. The results showed that DEGs were enriched in biological processes and cellular components closely related to the immune system, such as ‘leukocyte migration’(P = 8.97E-05), ‘humoral immune response’(P = 9.45E-05), ‘myeloid leukocyte migration’(P = 0.0002), ‘granulocyte chemotaxis’(P = 0.0002), ‘neutrophil activation’(P = 0.0002), and ‘neutrophil mediated immunity’(P = 0.0007), etc. (Supplementary Table S5, Fig. 7C).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs between high- and low-risk groups. A DEGs between high- and low-risk groups were shown in the volcano plot. B Top 50 up-regulated and top 50 down-regulated genes were shown in the heatmap. C GO enrichment analysis of DEGs

Full size image

The immune landscape of the high- and low-risk groups

The above findings led us to hypothesize that the prognostic signature might be related to the tumor microenvironment of cervical carcinoma. Firstly, the proportions of 22 immune cell types in 171 samples were estimated based on the LM22 signature files with CIBERSORT [5]. The abundance of 22 immune cells in 113 significant samples (P < 0.05) were shown in Fig. 8A. We found that there were no naive CD4 T cells distributed in either low- or high-risk group. Meanwhile, the correlations between 21 immune cell types were analyzed by Pearson correlation. And we found that resting memory CD4 T cells showed the highest negative correlation with CD8 T cells (cor = − 0.7), followed by activated memory CD4 T cells (cor = − 0.47). Besides, M1Macrophages also showed a high negative correlation with activated dendritic cells (cor = − 0.49). And activated mast cells showed a strong positive correlation with neutrophils (cor = 0.54) (Fig. 8B). Moreover, R package ‘vioplot’ was used to calculate the differences in immune cell types between high- and low-risk groups. We observed that the distributions of naive B cells, CD8 T cells, resting NK cells, M0 Macrophages, activated dendritic cells, and neutrophils were significantly different between two groups (P < 0.05, Fig. 8C).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Tumor microenvironment characteristics in low- and high-risk groups. A Proportions of different immune cell types in selected samples. B Correlations between different immune cell types. C Comparison of immune infiltration between high- and low -risk group (Blue: high risk group; Red: low risk group). D Correlations among prognostic gene signature and differentially distributed immune cells. E The expressions of immune checkpoint molecules in high- and low-risk groups

Full size image

Next, we analyzed the relationship among four prognostic gene and differentially distributed immune cells (Table S6 and Fig. 8D). The results showed that TEKT2 was positively correlated with naive B cells (p < 0.01). LPIN2 had strong positive correlations with naive B cells (p < 0.01) and CD8 T cells (p < 0.05). FABP4 was positively correlated with M0 macrophages (p < 0.05), but negatively correlated with CD8 T cells (p < 0.05). As for CXCL2, it was found to be positively correlated with activated dendritic cells (p < 0.01) and neutrophils (p < 0.01).

Furthermore, we detected the expression of immune checkpoint molecules correlated with immune response in low- and high-risk groups. We observed that CD274, CEACAM1, LGALS9, PVR and TNFRSF14 were significantly different (P < 0.05, Fig. 8E) between two groups, providing a novel insight into immunotherapy for cervical carcinoma patients.

Discussion

In recent years, NGS enable us to have a broader and deeper view in tumor. Numerous researches have validated the relationship between lymph nodes metastasis and poor prognosis [6,7,8]. Lymph nodes metastasis is quite common in cervical cancer. Recent years, researchers have revealed some possible mechanisms involved in lymph nodes metastasis in cervical cancer [9,10,11],indicating that lymph nodes metastasis is a complicated progress deserving more attention. However, comprehensive analysis about the genes involved in this process is still absent. Therefore, we integrated RNA-Seq data and clinical information of cervical cancer patients in TCGA database. 103 genes associated with lymph nodes metastasis were identified. Prognostic gene signature LPIN2, TEKT2, CXCL2, and FABP4 was obtained from these 103 genes by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. Then, we constructed a risk score model based on LPIN2, TEKT2, CXCL2, and FABP4, which had high accuracy in predicting the prognosis of cervical cancer patients. Moreover, we found that Lymph nodes metastasis may influence the prognosis of cervical cancer patients via tumor microenvironment, as evidenced by different immune cells infiltration and expressions of immune checkpoints between low- and high-risk groups.

TEKT2, LPIN2, CXCL2, and FABP4 were found to be associated with lymph nodes metastasis and identified as prognostic gene signature in our research. TEKT2 belongs to Tektin family, which is important in cytoskeleton formation [12]. Several studies have reported its role in spermatogenesis [13, 14]. However, its role in cervical cancer remains unclear. Destroyed cytoskeleton may inhibit cell migration and invasion in cervical cancer [15]. Proteomic analysis in cervical cancer cell lines revealed aberrant expression of cytoskeleton associated protein [16]. Therefore, we speculated that TEKT2 may regulate cervical cancer by affecting cytoskeleton in cervical cancer cells, which needs further study in the future. Moreover, we found TEKT2 is a protective factor, which is supported by its higher expression in low-risk group. Another protective factor in cervical cancer found in the current study was LPIN2. LPIN2 can regulate MAPK activation, which mediates synthesis of pro-IL-1β during inflammasome priming [17]. It has reported that IL-1β inflammatory response could inhibit breast cancer cell metastasis [18]. Thus, LPIN2 may affect the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer via IL-1β. CXCL2 and FABP4 have been intensively studied in malignancies. These two risky factors regulate the tumorigenesis via complicated mechanisms such as chemokine releasing and lipid metabolism [19,20,21,22,23]. In cervical cancer, CXCL2 may promote tumor growth and angiogenesis and NF-κB pathway is involved [24]. FABP4 may promote epithelia epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by activating AKT pathway [25], which supports its upregulation in high-risk group in our research. More solid experiments are needed to clarify the detailed functions and associated molecular mechanisms of these genes in cervical cancer. We constructed a risk score model based on the expressions and coefficients of these 4 genes. Then we divided these patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. To better understand the roles of these 4 lymph nodes metastasis associated genes in prognosis, we performed GO enrichment analysis of 345 DEGs between low- and high-risk group. We found that the DEGs were mainly enriched into immune related biological processes, one of which was humoral immune response (Fig. 7C). Humoral immune response is often observed in B cell associated immunity and plays an important role in virus or bacteria defection. Cervical cancer is significantly associated with HPV infection. Humoral immune response against HPV is an important process and it could allow the determination of the infection stage (transient, latent, persistent) and the stage of the disease [26]. Humoral immune response will facilitate antigen cross-presentation and activation of T cells, which have led to better application of HPV vaccine [27, 28].

All results above indicated that prognostic signature had a strong relationship with immunity. Immune cells are important parts for immune system and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) could be a marker for prognosis prediction [29]. Therefore, we compared the distribution of 22 types immune cells between high and low-risk groups, and analyzed the relationship between differentially distributed immune cells and prognostic signature. Interestingly, we found that the relationship between the abundance of neutrophils and the expression of CXCL2 was the most significant. In a previous study, CXCL2 signals can induce neutrophils aging [30], which supports significant relationship between CXCL2 and neutrophils found in our study (Fig. 8D). Neutrophils can infiltrate solid tumors at different extent. In some types of human tumors, high infiltration of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) is associated with poor prognosis [31, 32]. In cervical cancer, TANs density is an independent prognostic factor for shorter survival in those who were treated by definitive radiotherapy [33]. In following research, TANs even promotes radio- resistance in cervical cancer and MAPK pathway maybe involved [34]. Therefore, we supposed that CXCL2 may lead to activation of neutrophils signaling and result in poor prognosis in cervical cancer, which deserves further research.

Finally, we compared the expressions of checkpoints in high- and low-risk groups. The expressions of five checkpoint molecules were significantly different. Among them, CD274 (also named PD-L1),which was up-regulated in high-risk group, attracted our attention. PD-L1 antibody is quite promising in cervical cancer treatment [35]. In our previous study, PD-L1expression promotes lymph nodes metastasis in cervical cancer [4]. Herein, we supposed that prognostic signature may regulate lymph nodes metastasis via affecting the expression of PD-L1.

In summary, for the first time, our research revealed 4 genes associated with lymph nodes metastasis in cervical cancer and provided a prognostic prediction model based on these 4 genes. Besides, we explored the potential immune related mechanisms of these 4 genes in regulating cervical cancer. Our study has some limitations due to the absence of clinical validation and limited populations of cervical cancer patients in TCGA database. Our findings enrich our understanding of cervical cancer etiology, which will contribute to good clinical practice in immunotherapy and future target therapy research.

Availability of data and materials

This study obtained open data from the TCGA database. (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/).

References

  1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–32. PubMed PMID: 26808342. Epub 2016/01/26. eng. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):169–82. PubMed PMID: 30638582. Epub 2019/01/15. eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–35. PubMed PMID: 30656645. Epub 2019/01/19. eng. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang S, Li J, Xie J, Liu F, Duan Y, Wu Y, et al. Programmed death ligand 1 promotes lymph node metastasis and glucose metabolism in cervical cancer by activating integrin beta4/SNAI1/SIRT3 signaling pathway. Oncogene. 2018;30(30):4164–80PubMed PMID: 29706653. Epub 2018/05/01. eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0252-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen B, Khodadoust MS, Liu CL, Newman AM, Alizadeh AA. Profiling tumor infiltrating immune cells with CIBERSORT. Methods Mol Biol. 1711;2018:243–59. PubMed PMID: 29344893. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5895181. Epub 2018/01/19. eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Du R, Li L, Ma S, Tan X, Zhong S, Wu M. Lymph nodes metastasis in cervical cancer: incidences, risk factors, consequences and imaging evaluations. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018;14(5):e380–e5. PubMed PMID: 29855154. Epub 2018/06/02. eng. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.12997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Han L, Mo S, Xiang W, Li Q, Wang R, Xu Y, et al. Comparison of four lymph node staging systems for predicting prognosis for stage IV rectum cancer. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(4):111. PubMed PMID: 32175404. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC7049057. Epub 2020/03/17. eng. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.12.90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Aslan K, Meydanli MM, Oz M, Tohma YA, Haberal A, Ayhan A. The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and Para-aortic lymphadenectomy. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020;31(1):e1. PubMed PMID: 31788991. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6918892. Epub 2019/12/04. eng. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shang C, Wang W, Liao Y, Chen Y, Liu T, Du Q, et al. LNMICC promotes nodal metastasis of cervical Cancer by reprogramming fatty acid metabolism. Cancer Res. 2018;78(4):877–90. PubMed PMID: 29229603. Epub 2017/12/13. eng. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huo H, Tian J, Wang R, Li Y, Qu C, Wang N. Long non-coding RNA NORAD upregulate SIP1 expression to promote cell proliferation and invasion in cervical cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;106:1454–60. PubMed PMID: 30119219. Epub 2018/08/19. eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo H, Dai Y, Wang A, Wang C, Sun L, Wang Z. Association between expression of MMP-7 and MMP-9 and pelvic lymph node and Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(7):1274–83. PubMed PMID: 29767419. Epub 2018/05/17. eng. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13659.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Setter PW, Malvey-Dorn E, Steffen W, Stephens RE, Linck RW. Tektin interactions and a model for molecular functions. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312(15):2880–96. PubMed PMID: 16831421. Epub 2006/07/13. eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.05.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shimasaki S, Yamamoto E, Murayama E, Kurio H, Kaneko T, Shibata Y, et al. Subcellular localization of Tektin2 in rat sperm flagellum. Zool Sci. 2010;27(9):755–61. PubMed PMID: 20822404. Epub 2010/09/09. eng. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.27.755.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Honda S, Miki Y, Miyamoto Y, Kawahara Y, Tsukamoto S, Imai H, et al. Oocyte-specific gene Oog1 suppresses the expression of spermatogenesis-specific genes in oocytes. J Reprod Dev. 2018;64(4):297–301. PubMed PMID: 29731491. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6105735. Epub 2018/05/08. eng. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2018-024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J, Wang P, He Y, Liu X, Wang S, Ma C, et al. Graphene oxide inhibits cell migration and invasion by destroying actin cytoskeleton in cervical cancer cells. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(17):17625–33. PubMed PMID: 32924971. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC7521503. Epub 2020/09/15. eng. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103821.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pappa KI, Lygirou V, Kontostathi G, Zoidakis J, Makridakis M, Vougas K, et al. Proteomic analysis of Normal and Cancer cervical cell lines reveals deregulation of cytoskeleton-associated proteins. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2017;14(4):253–66. PubMed PMID: 28647699. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5572303. Epub 2017/06/26. eng. https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lordén G, Sanjuán-García I, de Pablo N, Meana C, Alvarez-Miguel I, Pérez-García MT, et al. Lipin-2 regulates NLRP3 inflammasome by affecting P2X7 receptor activation. J Exp Med. 2017;214(2):511–28. PubMed PMID: 28031477. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5294860. Epub 2016/12/30. eng. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20161452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Castaño Z, San Juan BP, Spiegel A, Pant A, DeCristo MJ, Laszewski T, et al. IL-1β inflammatory response driven by primary breast cancer prevents metastasis-initiating cell colonization. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(9):1084–97. PubMed PMID: 30154549. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6511979. Epub 2018/08/30. eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0173-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Girbl T, Lenn T, Perez L, Rolas L, Barkaway A, Thiriot A, et al. Distinct Compartmentalization of the Chemokines CXCL1 and CXCL2 and the Atypical Receptor ACKR1 Determine Discrete Stages of Neutrophil Diapedesis. Immunity. 2018;49(6):1062–76.e6 PubMed PMID: 30446388. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6303217. Epub 2018/11/18. eng.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin T, Zhang E, Mai PP, Zhang YZ, Chen X, Peng LS. CXCL2/10/12/14 are prognostic biomarkers and correlated with immune infiltration in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biosci Rep. 2021;4(6):BSR20204312, PubMed PMID: 34085699. Epub 2021/06/05. eng. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20204312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yan F, Shen N, Pang JX, Zhang YW, Rao EY, Bode AM, et al. Fatty acid-binding protein FABP4 mechanistically links obesity with aggressive AML by enhancing aberrant DNA methylation in AML cells. Leukemia. 2017;31(6):1434–42. PubMed PMID: 27885273. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5457366. Epub 2016/11/26. eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gharpure KM, Pradeep S, Sans M, Rupaimoole R, Ivan C, Wu SY, et al. FABP4 as a key determinant of metastatic potential of ovarian cancer. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2923. PubMed PMID: 30050129. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6062524. Epub 2018/07/28. eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04987-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mukherjee A, Chiang CY, Daifotis HA, Nieman KM, Fahrmann JF, Lastra RR, et al. Adipocyte-induced FABP4 expression in ovarian Cancer cells promotes metastasis and mediates carboplatin resistance. Cancer Res. 2020;80(8):1748–61. PubMed PMID: 32054768. Epub 2020/02/15. eng. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang W, Wu Q, Wang C, Yang L, Liu P, Ma C. AKIP1 promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth by upregulating CXC-chemokines in cervical cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2018;448(1–2):311–20. PubMed PMID: 29520695. Epub 2018/03/10. eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-018-3335-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jin J, Zhang Z, Zhang S, Chen X, Chen Z, Hu P, et al. Fatty acid binding protein 4 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cervical squamous cell carcinoma through AKT/GSK3β/snail signaling pathway. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018;461:155–64. PubMed PMID: 28893569. Epub 2017/09/13. eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gutierrez-Xicotencatl L, Salazar-Piña DA, Pedroza-Saavedra A, Chihu-Amparan L, Rodriguez-Ocampo AN, Maldonado-Gama M, et al. Humoral immune response against human papillomavirus as source of biomarkers for the prediction and detection of cervical Cancer. Viral Immunol. 2016;29(2):83–94. PubMed PMID: 26780189. Epub 2016/01/19. eng. https://doi.org/10.1089/vim.2015.0087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Massa S, Paolini F, Curzio G, Cordeiro MN, Illiano E, Demurtas OC, et al. A plant protein signal sequence improved humoral immune response to HPV prophylactic and therapeutic DNA vaccines. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(2):271–82. PubMed PMID: 28118086. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5328226. Epub 2017/01/25. eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1264766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Vujadinovic M, Khan S, Oosterhuis K, Uil TG, Wunderlich K, Damman S, et al. Adenovirus based HPV L2 vaccine induces broad cross-reactive humoral immune responses. Vaccine. 2018;36(30):4462–70. PubMed PMID: 29914845. Epub 2018/06/20. eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Darb-Esfahani S, Lederer B, Heppner BI, Weber KE, et al. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and prognosis in different subtypes of breast cancer: a pooled analysis of 3771 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(1):40–50. PubMed PMID: 29233559. Epub 2017/12/14. eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30904-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Adrover JM, Del Fresno C, Crainiciuc G, Cuartero MI, Casanova-Acebes M, Weiss LA, et al. A Neutrophil Timer Coordinates Immune Defense and Vascular Protection. Immunity. 2019;50(2):390–402.e10 PubMed PMID: 30709741. Epub 2019/02/03. eng.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, Bratman SV, Feng W, Kim D, et al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):938–45. PubMed PMID: 26193342. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4852857. Epub 2015/07/21. eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Shaul ME, Fridlender ZG. Tumour-associated neutrophils in patients with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(10):601–20. PubMed PMID: 31160735. Epub 2019/06/05. eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-019-0222-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsumoto Y, Mabuchi S, Kozasa K, Kuroda H, Sasano T, Yokoi E, et al. The significance of tumor-associated neutrophil density in uterine cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145(3):469–75. PubMed PMID: 28552395. Epub 2017/05/30. eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wisdom AJ, Hong CS, Lin AJ, Xiang Y, Cooper DE, Zhang J, et al. Neutrophils promote tumor resistance to radiation therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(37):18584–9. PubMed PMID: 31462499. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6744874. Epub 2019/08/30. eng. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901562116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, Perets R, Italiano A, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Efficacy and safety of Pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical Cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(17):1470–8. PubMed PMID: 30943124. Epub 2019/04/04. eng. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the Youth Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81902652), the Basic research in Yunnan Province (Kunming Medical University Joint Project): 2019FE001(− 150), and Yunnan Provincial Medical Reserve Talents Project:H-2019007.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yang Ping and RuanYouqin contributed equally to this article, they were co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, 650118, China

    Ping Yang, Youqin Ruan, Hongying Yang & Shaojia Wang

Authors
  1. Ping Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Youqin Ruan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhiling Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hongying Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shaojia Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived and designed the study: SW. Performed the data analysis: PY and SW. Checked the data: PY and YR. Obtained the original data from the database: YG. Wrote the paper: YP and ZY. Critical review of the manuscript: HY. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongying Yang or Shaojia Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center. Data of our present study was downloaded from an open database TCGA, so there was no informed consent from participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, P., Ruan, Y., Yan, Z. et al. Comprehensive analysis of lymph nodes metastasis associated genes in cervical cancer and its significance in treatment and prognosis. BMC Cancer 21, 1230 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08945-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08945-8

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us