Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Trastuzumab-based palliative chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric cancer: a single-center real-world data

BMC Cancer volume 21, Article number: 325 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Since the results of the ToGA trial were published, trastuzumab-based chemotherapy has been used as the standard first-line treatment for HER2-positive recurrent or primary metastatic gastric cancer (RPMGC). However, the real-world data has been rarely reported. Therefore, we investigated the outcomes of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in a single center.

Methods

This study analyzed the real-world data of 47 patients with HER2-positive RPMGC treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in a single institution.

Results

With the median follow-up duration of 18.8 months in survivors, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 12.8 and 6.9 months, respectively, and the overall response rate was 64%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 and massive amount of ascites were independent poor prognostic factors for OS, while surgical resection before or after chemotherapy was associated with favorable OS, in multivariate analysis. In addition, 5 patients who underwent conversion surgery after chemotherapy demonstrated an encouraging median OS of 30.8 months, all with R0 resection.

Conclusions

Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive RPMGC in the real world demonstrated outcomes almost comparable to those of the ToGA trial. Moreover, conversion surgery can be actively considered in fit patients with a favorable response after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is the most commonly newly diagnosed type of cancer in Korea and the 2nd leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the world [1, 2]. The outcome of recurrent or primary metastatic GC (RPMGC) is poor; the median overall survival (OS) is approximately 4 months with best supportive care and approximately 11–12 months with palliative chemotherapy [3, 4]. Combination chemotherapy with a two or three-drug regimen, including platinum, fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, or taxane has been the mainstay in the treatment of RPMGC [5,6,7].

While trastuzumab has been used in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, several studies have focused on its effectiveness on patients with HER2-positive GC due to the 8.2–15.6% positivity of HER2 expression status [8,9,10]. Since the benefit of adding trastuzumab to standard chemotherapy in metastatic HER2-positive GC was demonstrated in the ToGA trial, trastuzumab-based chemotherapy has been used as the standard first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive RPMGC for approximately 10 years [11]. However, the real-world data concerning trastuzumab-based palliative chemotherapy for RPMGC has been rarely reported.

Therefore, we investigated the outcomes of patients with RPMGC treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in a single center, while analyzing the potential prognostic factors.

Methods

Patients

All histologically documented advanced HER2-positive gastric adenocarcinoma patients who had initiated first-line palliative trastuzumab-based chemotherapy between June 2011 and December 2019 at Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea, were retrospectively identified. The eligible patients were those with recurrent disease or American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IV [12] with distant metastasis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0–2, and sufficient hepatorenal function. Eligible HER2-positive patients had the result of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) positive with IHC 2+. HER2 testing and interpretation had been performed at pathology laboratory of our institution by consistent criteria, using Ventana Benchmark XT system (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Tucson, Arizona, USA), according to gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma guideline from the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology [13].

Doses and intervals between courses of chemotherapy were the same as reported in the ToGA trial, with some modifications according to the discretion of physicians in cases of chemotherapy-induced toxicity [11]. The responses to chemotherapy were evaluated every 2 or 3 cycles (6 or 9 weeks) with abdominal computed tomography (CT) with or without chest CT according to the discretion of medical oncologists.

This research protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Ajou University Hospital (IRB approval no. AJIRB-MED-MDB-20). Informed consent was waived by the IRB because this study was conducted using medical records of anonymized patients. Some patients (n = 9) in this study cohort were included in previous studies about palliative chemotherapy for RPMGC [4, 14, 15]. However, the follow-up of the patients was extended in the current study.

Clinical review

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the eligible patients and collected data such as age, gender, ECOG PS, disease status (primary or recurrent), histologic type, HER2 status (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with SISH +), liver metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, amount of ascites, types of chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab, number of administration of each chemotherapeutic agent, trastuzumab maintenance status, use of surgical resection, overall response, progression status, and survival information.

The amount of ascites was classified into four categories according to previous reports: no (not observed in the CT scan), small (limited to the pelvic cavity or around the liver), moderate (definitely present on CT scan, but, neither small nor large), massive (continuous from the liver surface to the pelvic cavity) [16, 17].

Trastuzumab maintenance was defined as the continuation of trastuzumab after completing six or more cycles of triplet chemotherapy (capecitabine or 5-FU/cisplatin/trastuzumab) without evidence of disease progression, including treatment with capecitabine, in addition to trastuzumab. Conversion surgery was defined as surgical resection performed after palliative chemotherapy when complete resection, including metastatic lesions, appeared possible according to the discretion of surgeons [18].

As a historical control cohort, we investigated the outcome of 164 RPMGC patients who initiated palliative chemotherapy with non-trastuzumab containing regimen between June 2011 and December 2014. These patients were included in the cohort of previous published study [4].

Statistical analysis

OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The log rank test was used to analyze the differences between the survival curves. PFS was defined as the time from the starting day of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy to disease progression or the death of any cause. OS was defined as the time from the starting day of chemotherapy to death, while data on the survivors were censored at the last follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the factors influencing PFS and OS, and factors with p values < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were included. All statistical analyses were two-sided and performed using IBM SPSS Statics software (version 23). In addition, responses to chemotherapy were evaluated by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 [19].

Results

Patient characteristics

Overall, 47 patients with RPMGC received first-line palliative trastuzumab-based chemotherapy at our institution. The characteristics of patients at the initiation of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy are summarized in Table 1. Ten patients (21%) were ≥ 70 years, with a median age of 59 (36–83) years; 38 patients were male (81%); and 7 patients (15%) were in ECOG PS 2. The number of patients with primary metastatic gastric cancer was 36 (77%), while all of them were in AJCC stage IV. Furthermore, the numbers of patients with liver metastasis and peritoneal metastasis were 24 (51%) and 15(32%), respectively. In addition, the patients with no, small or moderate, and massive ascites on CT scan were 26 (55%), 16 (34%), and 5 (11%), respectively. Three patients received palliative surgical resection (gastrectomy, 2; resection of the metastatic liver lesion, 1) before chemotherapy. Surgical resection was performed in 6 patients (13%) after chemotherapy. Among them, 5 patients underwent conversion surgery after achieving partial response to chemotherapy, all with R0 resection, while 1 patient received resection of newly developed ovarian metastasis despite the response of other lesions. Re-evaluation of HER2 status following treatment was performed in surgical specimens of 5 IHC 3+ patients (conversion surgery: 4, palliative surgery: 1) who underwent surgery after chemotherapy, with still IHC 3+ in 4 patients and 2+ in 1 patient, respectively.

Table 1 Patient characteristics
Full size table

The median number of trastuzumab administration was 8 (range, 1–56), and that of cisplatin was 6 (1–15). Thirty-five patients (74%) were given capecitabine, while 12 patients (26%) were given 5-FU, with the median number of capecitabine being 7 (range, 1–56) and 5-FU being 6 (range, 1–8). Furthermore, trastuzumab maintenance therapy was administrated to 19 patients (40%). While 15 patients received 6 cycles of triple combination chemotherapy, 10 patients underwent more than 6 cycles of triplet therapy (maximum 16 cycles) according to the discretion of medical oncologists. Second-line chemotherapy was performed in 22 patients, whereas 13 patients were treated with third or more lines of chemotherapy. In addition, no patient received other anti-HER2 agents or trastuzumab as second or more lines of treatment.

Patient outcomes

Among 39 patients with a measurable lesion before the initiation of chemotherapy, 3 patients had a complete response and 22 patients achieved a partial response, giving the overall response rate of 64%, while 5 patients had stable disease, 5 patients had progressive disease, and 4 patients were unevaluable without follow-up imaging study due to various reasons.

Nine patients were alive at the last follow-up time with a median follow-up duration of 18.8 months (range, 9.3–82.9 months). The median OS and PFS were 12.8 (Fig. 1a) and 6.9 months (Fig. 1b), respectively. In the univariate analysis, the patients with ECOG PS 2 had significantly shorter median OS than those with ECOG PS 0 or 1 (p < 0.0001), and a massive amount of ascites also correlated with a shorter median OS (p = 0.001) (Fig. 2a). In addition, the patients who underwent surgical resection before or after initiation of chemotherapy showed significantly longer OS (p = 0.004) (Fig. 2b). ECOG PS 2 (p = 0.001) and massive ascites (p = 0.005) were independent poor prognostic factors, while surgical resection was associated with favorable OS (p = 0.025), in the multivariate analysis (Table 2). Univariate and multivariate analysis for PFS showed similar results (Table 2). In 5 patients with conversion surgery after chemotherapy, the median OS was 30.8 months, while 3 of them were alive at the time of analysis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overall survival (a) and progression-free survival (b) from the start of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Overall survival from the start of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy according to the amount of ascites (a) and surgical resection (b)

Full size image
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of progression-free survival and overall survival
Full size table

Cisplatin was discontinued, due to grade 3 or 4 side effects in 8 patients: acute kidney injury in 3 patients, nausea and vomiting in 2 patients, general weakness in 2 patients, and sepsis in 1 patient. The remaining drugs of the regimen, however, were continued. Four cases of treatment-related mortality occurred: pneumonia and sepsis both from neutropenia, heart failure, and cerebral infarction.

In the historical control cohort, the median OS of RPMGC patients treated with non-trastuzumab containing regimen was 11 months, while that of combination chemotherapy group (131 patients) and single agent group (33 patients) was 11 months and 9 months, respectively. In addition, almost all patients in the control cohort were HER2-negative except for 2 HER2-positive patients [4].

Discussion

Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy has been used as a primary first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive RPMGC at our institution since June 2011, when trastuzumab had become reimbursable from the Korean national health insurance. In this study, the median OS and PFS (12.8 and 6.9 months, respectively) of patients were almost comparable to those of the ToGA study (13.8 and 6.7 months), with similar baseline characteristics except for somewhat higher proportion of patients with ECOG 2 (15% vs. 9.8%) and 5-FU/cisplatin regimen (26% vs. 13%) [11]. In addition, the median OS (11 months) of RPMGC patients treated with non-trastuzumab combination chemotherapy in the historical control cohort was almost same as that of control group in the ToGA trial [4]. Moreover, the response to chemotherapy of this study cohort appeared higher compared to that of the ToGA trial (64% vs. 52%). Because this study was based on real-world data and the OS benefit in the Asian population of the trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in the ToGA trial was not significantly proved, these results appeared encouraging, although the number of patients was relatively small. The median OS of this study tends to be a little shorter than that of the ToGA trial, which could be attributed to the difference in the proportion of ECOG 2 patients (15% vs. 10.8%) or the relatively small number of patients in this study. However, considering the almost similar PFS between this study and the ToGA trial as well as the rather higher response rate, the findings of this study suggest that treatment in real-world settings can achieve outcomes comparable to clinical trials.

In several studies, ECOG PS 2 has been reported as a poor prognostic factor in patients with RPMGC [4, 20, 21]. In this study, the median PFS and OS of ECOG PS 2 patients were very poor (2.7 and 4.1 months, respectively), with an independent prognostic significance of ECOG PS 2 in the multivariate analysis. In addition, the benefit of adding trastuzumab was not observed in ECOG PS 2 patients in the ToGA trial [11]. Therefore, careful consideration and discussion with patients are essential before initiating trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in ECOG PS 2 patients. Considering the previous studies, including from our institution, which reported the absence of significant differences in the OS between combination and single-agent chemotherapy in ECOG PS 2 patients [4, 22,23,24], single-agent chemotherapy may be a useful option in ECOG PS 2 patients, even for HER2-positive cases.

A massive amount of ascites was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for OS in this study population. Although there was no study concerning the prognostic significance of the amount of ascites in patients with RPMGC treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy, a poor outcome has been reported in patients with massive ascites who underwent different types of chemotherapy in some studies [17, 25]. Therefore, in patients with a massive amount of ascites, especially with ECOG PS 2, the use of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy should be carefully decided.

Surgical resection before or after chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor in this study group, although the number of patients who underwent surgery was small. The role of surgical resection in metastatic gastric cancer is controversial. The REGATTA trial, the only phase III trial in metastatic gastric cancer patients, did not demonstrate the benefit of palliative gastrectomy before chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone [26]. On the contrary, there were several encouraging retrospective studies for post-chemotherapy resection (i.e., conversion surgery) in patients with metastatic gastric cancer [27, 28]. Although various combination regimens were used before the conversion surgery, there were limited reports on trastuzumab-based chemotherapy [27,28,29,30,31]. A recent retrospective study from Japan reported favorable outcomes in 20 patients who underwent surgical resection after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy [29]. Considering the encouraging outcome of patients who received conversion surgery in this study with 30.8 months of median OS, surgical resection could be actively considered if patients show a good response after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy, amenable to complete resection.

The treatment-related mortality rate of 8% (4 patients) of this study cohort appears higher than that of the ToGA trial (3%). Given the relatively small number of patients in this real-world data, it is difficult to consider it as meaningful. However, mortality cases of infection resulting from neutropenia or heart failure suggest that careful monitoring is needed during trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. In addition, in this study, a significant number of patients (17%) experienced discontinuation of cisplatin during treatment. Replacement of cisplatin with other agents, such as oxaliplatin or irinotecan, can be considered in patients with high risk of cisplatin-induced toxicity. However, further clinical trial is necessary to establish such regimens in routine practice.

This study has some limitations. First, since it is a retrospective study with a relatively small sample size, the role of potential prognostic factors (i.e., massive amount of ascites and conversion surgery) cannot be clearly defined, requiring further larger studies. Second, the timing of the response assessment differed according to the treating medical oncologist. Third, the detailed assessment of chemotherapy-induced toxicity was not conducted as a limitation of the retrospective study. Nonetheless, the current study investigated the real-world data by analyzing the eligible patients within a certain period, while comparing with the results of the ToGA trial. Although few retrospective studies of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy have been reported, they had some limitations in reflecting the real-world data, such as studies including patients enrolled in clinical trials, treated as second-line chemotherapy, or receiving cytotoxic agent combinations not used in the ToGA trial as well as multi-center studies with a small number of patients per institution [32,33,34,35,36]. In addition to several clinical implications, the present study suggests that conversion surgery may achieve favorable results after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive RPMGC in real world demonstrated outcomes almost comparable to those of the ToGA trial. Moreover, conversion surgery can be actively considered in fit patients with a favorable response after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the confidentiality of the data of patient but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

GC:

Gastric cancer

RPMGC:

Recurrent or primary metastatic gastric cancer

OS:

Overall survival

ToGA:

Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer

AJCC:

American Joint Committee on Cancer

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PS:

Performance status

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

SISH:

Silver-enhanced in situ hybridization

CT:

Computed tomography

IRB:

Institutional review board

PFS:

Progression-free survival

References

  1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkim DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong S, Won YJ, Park YR, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Lee ES. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2017. Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):335–50. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagner AD, Syn NLX, Moehler M, Grothe W, Yong WP, Tai BC, et al. Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8(8):CD004064.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi JH, Choi YW, Kang SY, Jeong GS, Lee HW, Jeong SH, et al. Combination versus single-agent as palliative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6666-1.

  5. Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(1):36–46. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa073149.

  6. Bouché O, Raoul JL, Bonnetain F, Giovannini M, Etienne PL, Lledo G, et al. Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a federation francophone de Cancerologie digestive group study--FFCD 9803. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(21):4319–28. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.01.140.

  7. Cutsem EV, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):4991–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barros-Silva JD, Leitão D, Afonso L, Vieira J, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Fragoso M, et al. Association of ERBB2 gene status with histopathological parameters and disease-specific survival in gastric carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(3):487–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604885.

  9. Koopman T, Smits MM, Louwen M, Hage M, Boot H, Imholz AL. HER2 positivity in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathological analysis and comparison. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(8):1343–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-014-1900-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanner M, Hollmén M, Junttila TT, Kapanen AI, Tommola S, Soini Y, et al. Amplification of HER-2 in gastric carcinoma: association with topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification, intestinal type, poor prognosis and sensitivity to trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(2):273–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi064.

  11. Bang YJ, Cutsem EV, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):687–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Amin+MB%2C+Edge+SB%2C+Greene+FL%2C+et+al.%2C+eds.+AJCC+cancer+staging+manual.+8th+ed.+New+York%3A+Springer%2C+2016.

  13. Bartley AN, Washington MK, Calasacco C, Ventura CB, Ismaila N, Benson AB, et al. HER2 testing and clinical decision making in Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(4):446–64. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4836.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi YW, Ahn MS, Jeong GS, Lee HW, Jeong SH, Kang SY, et al. The role of surgical resection before palliative chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39432-7.

  15. Choi YW, Ahn MS, Jeong GS, Lee HW, Jeong SH, Kang SY, et al. The role of third-line chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer: a cohort study with propensity score matching analysis. Medicine. 2018;97(39):e12588. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012588.

  16. Shitara K, Mizota A, Matsuo K, Sato Y, Kondo C, Takahari D, et al. Fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0143-8.

  17. Matsumoto H, Kawazoe A, Shimada K, Fukuoka S, Kuboki Y, Bando H, et al. A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus ramucirumab in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with ascites. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4057-7.

  18. Kodera Y, Kobayashi D, Tanaka C, Fujiwara M. Gastric adenocarcinoma with Para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a borderline resectable cancer? Surg Today. 2015;45(9):1082–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1067-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

  20. Shitara K, Muro K, Matsuo K, Ura T, Takahari D, Yokota T, et al. Chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer with performance status 2. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009;3(6):220–4.

  21. Ganguly S, Biswas B, Ghosh J, Dabkara D. Metastatic gastric cancer: real world scenario from a developing country. South Asian J Cancer. 2018;7(3):171–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/sajc.sajc_2_18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(3):215–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70035-4.

  23. Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(11):1063–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70259-1.

  24. Sun DS, Jeon EK, Won HS, Park JC, Shim BY, Park SY, et al. Outcomes in elderly patients treated with a single-agent or combination regimen as first-line chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18(3):644–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0405-8.

  25. Zheng LN, Wen F, Xu P, Zhang S. Prognostic significance of malignant ascites in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: a systemic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7(20):3247–58. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fujitani K, Yang HK, Mizusawa J, Kim YW, Terashima M, Han SU, et al. Gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor (REGATTA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(3):309–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00553-7.

  27. Zhang F, Huang X, Song Y, Gao P, Zhou C, Guo Z, et al. Conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01158.

  28. Beom SH, Choi YY, Baek SE, Li SX, Lim JS, Son T, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment for patients with stage IV gastric cancer: the role of conversion surgery following chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4998-x.

  29. Takahashi R, Nunobe S, Osumi H, Takahari D, Yamamoto N, Ida S, et al. Clinical outcomes of radical gastrectomy following trastuzumab-based chemotherapy for stage IV HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Surg Today. 2020;50(10):1240–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02011-9.

  30. Ikari N, Nakajima G, Taniguchi K, Sasagawa T, Narumiya K, Yamada T, et al. HER2-positive gastric cancer with paraaortic nodal metastasis successfully resected after chemotherapy with trastuzumab: a case report. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(2):867–72.

  31. Dong CX, Fu JF, Ye XY, Li XF, Zhong X, Yuan Y. Surgical resection of advanced gastric cancer following trastuzumab/oxaliplatin/capecitabine combination therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(34):12355–8. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ilhan-Mutlu A, Taghizadeh H, Beer A, Dolak W, Ba-Ssalamah A, Schoppmann SF, et al. Correlation of trastuzumab-based treatment with clinical characteristics and prognosis in HER2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a retrospective single center analysis. Cancer Biol Ther. 2018;19(3):169–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2017.1414759.

  33. Yi JH, Kang JH, Hwang IG, Ahn HK, Baek HJ, Lee SI, et al. A retrospective analysis for patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer who were treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy:in the perspectives of ethnicity and histology. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(2):553–60. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.155.

  34. Ock CY, Lee KW, Kim JW, Kim JS, Kim TY, Lee KH, et al. Optimal patient selection for trastuzumab treatment in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(11):2520–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2659.

  35. Qiu MZ, Li Q, Wang ZQ, Liu TS, Liu Q, Wei XL, et al. HER2-positive patients receiving trastuzumab treatment have a comparable prognosis with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer patients: a prospective cohort observation. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(10):2468–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28559.

  36. Al-Batran SE, Moorahrend E, Maintz C, Goetze TO, Hempel D, Thuss-Patience P, et al. Clinical practice observation of trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth receptor 2-positive metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Oncologist. 2020;25(8):e1181–7. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jin-Hyuk Choi and Mi Sun Ahn contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, South Korea

    Tae-Hwan Kim, Hun Do Cho, Yong Won Choi, Hyun Woo Lee, Seok Yun Kang, Geum Sook Jeong, Jin-Hyuk Choi & Mi Sun Ahn

  2. Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-380, South Korea

    Seung-Soo Sheen

Authors
  1. Tae-Hwan Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hun Do Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong Won Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hyun Woo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seok Yun Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Geum Sook Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jin-Hyuk Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mi Sun Ahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Seung-Soo Sheen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JHC and MSA designed and planned the study. THK, HDC, YWC, HWL, SYK, GSJ, JHC and MSA collected and analyzed clinical data. THK wrote the main manuscript and JHC and MSA edited the manuscript. THK, JHC and MSA performed statistical analysis and SSS reviewed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jin-Hyuk Choi or Mi Sun Ahn.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocols were approved by the institutional review board of Ajou University Hospital (IRB approval no. AJIRB-MED-MDB-20). Furthermore, the institutional review board of Ajou University Hospital decided to waive the informed consent for this study because it was a retrospective study using anonymized data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, TH., Do Cho, H., Choi, Y.W. et al. Trastuzumab-based palliative chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric cancer: a single-center real-world data. BMC Cancer 21, 325 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08058-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08058-2

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us