Skip to main content

Advertisement

EORTC-1203-GITCG - the “INNOVATION”-trial: Effect of chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, in the perioperative treatment of HER2 positive, gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma on pathologic response rate: a randomized phase II-intergroup trial of the EORTC-Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, Korean Cancer Study Group and Dutch Upper GI-Cancer group

Article metrics

  • 768 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

Background

10–20% of patients with gastric cancer (GC) have HER2+ tumors. Addition of trastuzumab (T) to cisplatin/fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (CT) improved survival in metastatic, HER2+ GC. When pertuzumab (P) was added to neoadjuvant T and CT, a significant increase in histopathological complete response rate was observed in HER2+ breast cancer. This study aims to investigate the added benefit of using both HER2 targeting drugs (T alone or the combination of T + P), in combination with perioperative CT for localized HER2+ GC.

Methods

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II trial. HER2 status from patients with resectable GC (UICC TNM7 tumor stage Ib-III) will be centrally determined. Two hundred and-fifteen patients from 52 sites in 14 countries will be centrally randomized (1:2:2 ratio) to one of the following treatment arms:

  1. 1.

    Standard: CT alone. CT regimens will be FLOT (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, taxotere) CapOx (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) or FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) according to investigator’s choice in Europe, and cisplatin/capecitabine in Asia.

  2. 2.

    Experimental arm 1: CT as in control group, plus T (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) at day 1, independent of CT chosen for 3 cycles of 3 weeks before and after surgery.

  3. 3.

    Experimental arm 2: CT plus T as in experimental arm 1, plus P (840 mg every 3 weeks) on day 1.

Adjuvant treatment with T or T + P will continue for 17 cycles in total. Stratification factors are: histology (intestinal/non-intestinal); region (Asia vs Europe); location (GEJ vs non-GEJ); HER2 immunohistochemistry score (IHC 3+ vs IHC 2+/FISH+) and chemotherapy regimen. Primary objective is to detect an increase in the major pathological response rate from 25 to 45% either with CT plus T alone, or with CT plus the combination of T and P.

Discussion

Depending on the results of the INNOVATION trial, the addition of HER2 targeted treatment with either T or T and P to CT may inform future study designs or become a standard in the perioperative management HER2+ GC.

Trial registration

This article reports a health care intervention on human participants and was registered on July 10, 2014 under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02205047; EudraCT: 2014–000722-38.

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is the 5th most common malignancy, and third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide [1]. Since the publication of the “MAGIC” trial [2], D2 resection in a high-volume surgical center and perioperative chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU (ECF) became standard of care in Europe [3] for medically fit patients with resectable, T1N + M0 to T4N + M0 gastric cancer. In contrast, in Asia adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 [4], or capecitabine and oxaliplatin [5] are standard of care for potentially curative resectable GC. The results of the “MAGIC” trial have recently been challenged by the presentation of the results from the AIO-FLOT-4-trial [6]. This randomized phase III study compared the perioperative chemotherapy regimens FLOT (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) with ECF (epirubicine, cisplatin and 5-FU), and demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (median survival: 35 vs.50 months; projected 5-year-survival: 36 versus 45%) for patients treated with FLOT. Nevertheless, more than 40% of patients treated with perioperative FLOT have either a minimal or no pathological response to this treatment (TRG 3) (according to Becker et al. [7] or cannot proceed to surgery, and further improvement of therapy for GC patients is urgently required.

Between 10 and 20% of patients with GC are HER2 positive (HER2+) [8, 9]. In patients with advanced, HER2+ GC or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, the addition of trastuzumab (T) to standard cisplatin/fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy improved overall survival significantly [10]. In HER2+ breast cancer, the addition of T to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved both, pathological complete response rates and event-free survival (defined as: time from randomization to disease recurrence or progression): 71% versus 56% at 3 years; Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.59, p = 0.013) [11]. A further significant improvement of pathological complete response rates after neoadjuvant treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer has been observed recently, when the dimerization inhibitor pertuzumab was added to trastuzumab and chemotherapy (pathological complete response rates 29% versus 45%) [12]. In advanced, HER2+ breast cancer, the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab and docetaxel increased progression-free survival from 12.4 to 18.5 months (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.51–0.75; p < 0.001) [13], and overall survival from 40.8 (95% CI 35.8–48.3) to 56.5 (95% CI 49.3 – not reached) months [14]. In contrast, in advanced HER2+ GC, the addition of pertuzumab to capecitabine/cisplatin/trastuzumab improved survival by 3.3 months, which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.585) [15]. With respect to targeted, perioperative treatment of HER2+ GC and GEJ cancers, data from randomized clinical trials are lacking.

Methods

Study design and aim

EORTC 1203 -“INNOVATION” (https://www.eortc.org/research_field/clinical-detail/1203/) is a prospective, multicenter, international, randomized phase II trial which aims to evaluate the effect of targeted treatment using either trastuzumab, or the combination of trastuzumab plus pertuzumab in combination with perioperative chemotherapy on the pathologic response rate in patients with localized (stage IB-III according to TNM, 7TH edition) GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma. The trial was designed by the EORTC, which is the legal sponsor. It is conducted by EORTC as leading group, in cooperation with the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (DUCG). Surgical quality assessment is performed in collaboration with the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG).

Study flow

After signing the informed consent and registration of potentially eligible patients, formalin fixed paraffin embedded material from the diagnostic biopsy is sent to a central laboratory for determination of the HER2 status. Only patients with a centrally determined, positive HER2 status, who fulfill the eligibility criteria mentioned below, are randomized centrally by the EORTC randomization system in the following three treatment arms (Fig. 1):

Fig. 1
figure1

INNOVATION Study (Version 4.1) flow chart. CapOx: Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin; mFOLFOX 6: Modified FOLFOX 6; FLOT: 5-fluorouracil (FU), Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Taxotere; CisPT: Cisplatin; Cape: Capecitabine; Her-2: Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2; GE-junction: Gastroesophageal junction; w: weeks

Interventions: In the initial version of the protocol (version1.0 of August 29, 2014), based on the evidence available at that time, cisplatin and 5-FU/capecitabine [16] were selected as chemotherapy backbone. After publication of the results of the FLOT-4 trial [17], the protocol was amended (version 4.1 of 11/12/2017) to allow - in Europe – either FLOT, FOLFOX or CapOx as chemotherapy backbone, according to what the investigator considers as in the best interest of the patient. By contrast, in absence of data for FLOT in Asian patients, and after discussion with the Asian investigators, the chemotherapy backbone of cisplatin and 5-FU/capecitabine in Asian patients remains unchanged. A detailed list of all protocol changes is provided in Appendix 2.

Standard arm - chemotherapy alone

  • Before amendment 4.1 (and continued in Asia after this amendment): Cisplatin (80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily every 2 out of 3 weeks), or 5-FU (800 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 3 weeks) for 3 cycles before and after surgery.

  • After amendment 4.1 in Europe: FLOT is administered in cycles of 2 weeks for 4 cycles (= 8 weeks) on day 1, 15, 29 and 43 pre- and postoperatively, with Docetaxel 50 mg/m2, followed by Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 diluted with 250 to 500 ml of 5% glucose solution as a 2 h infusion, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 over 2 h and 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 as a 24 h-infusion. Alternatively, either CapOx is given for 3 cycles of 3 weeks (=9 weeks) on day 1, 22 and 43 pre- and postoperatively, with Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1, and followed by capecitabine given orally at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 twice daily from the evening of day 1 to the morning of day 15 every 3 weeks or mFOLFOX6 is given for 4 cycles of 2 weeks (=8 weeks) on day 1, 15, 29 and 43 pre- and postoperatively, with oxaliplatin at a dose of 85 mg/m2, followed by leucovorin 400 mg/m2 iv over 2 h on day 1, and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 iv bolus on day 1, then 1200 mg/m2/d × 2 days over 46–48 h continuous infusion every 2 weeks. Chemotherapy should be restarted 4 to 6 weeks after surgery, if the patient has sufficiently recovered, in all trial arms

Experimental arm 1

Chemotherapy as in standard arm, plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) on day 1, 22 and 43, independent of the chemotherapy regimen chosen, for 3 cycles of 3 weeks before and after surgery.

Experimental arm 2

Chemotherapy plus trastuzumab as in experimental arm 1, plus pertuzumab (840 mg every 3 weeks) at day 1, 22 and 43, independent of the chemotherapy regimen chosen.

Surgery is scheduled within 2–4 weeks after the completion of cycle 3 in a 3-week-cycle, and after completion of cycle 4 in a 2-week-cycle if the white blood count has normalized again and the patient is clinically deemed fit to undergo major surgery. Surgery is performed according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2014 (version 3) [18]. The extent of the surgical resection depends primarily on the location of the tumor and is either an extended total, partial or subtotal gastrectomy, or – for tumors of the GEJ – esophagogastrectomy and reconstruction via gastric tube or extended total gastrectomy according to the decision of the surgeon. Surgical CRFs, mandatory intra-operative photo documentation, the operative report, the pathology report, central pathology review and assessment of surgical complications according to Dindo [19] will be used for surgical quality assessment.

Maintenance treatment is performed with trastuzumab alone or trastuzumab plus pertuzumab in experimental arms 1 and 2 starting after the end of adjuvant chemotherapy, and continuing for a total of 17 cycles from the start of neoadjuvant treatment.

Main inclusion criteria for REGISTRATION

Histologically proven, gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma (Siewert I-III), absence of distant metastases on CT scan of thorax and abdomen, age > 18 years, WHO performance status 0–1 in a patient judged medically fit for gastrectomy/esophagogastrectomy as decided by the investigator.

Main inclusion criteria for RANDOMIZATION

HER2 overexpression, as determined by central testing using immunohistochemistry (IHC 3+) or the combination of IHC 2+ and HER2 FISH (Fluorescence In Situ-hybridization) positive. Amenable to gastrectomy/esophagogastrectomy with curative intent as confirmed by a multidisciplinary team discussion. UICC (7th edition) tumor stage Ib to III, as defined by CT scan and/or MRI. Endosonography (EUS) is recommended, but not mandatory. Absence of contraindications for any of the study treatments. No prior chemotherpy or antibody treatment. Adequate organ function. Written informed consent according to ICH/GCP, and national/local regulations.

Primary endpoint: major pathological response rate (< 10% vital residual tumor cells) according to Becker et al. [20].

Secondary endpoints: are R0 resection rate, pathological complete response rate, locoregional failure, distant failure, progression-free survival according to RECIST v1.1, recurrence-free-survival from surgery, overall survival and adverse events (according to CTCAE v 4.0).

Schedule of investigations

Before registration: histologic diagnosis of gastric or GE-junction adenocarcinoma, written informed consent for screening.

During screening: Central HER2 assessment, CT scan of thorax and abdomen (needed within 35 days of treatment start), hepatic MRI in case of suspected liver lesions, brain MRI if clinically indicated echocardiography, ECG, laboratory tests including hematology and biochemistry, assessment of adverse events, multidisciplinary team discussion of surgical resectability and general operability. Echo-endoscopy and laparoscopy are not mandatory and performed at the investigator’s discretion.

After randomization/before each (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy cycle: Clinical and laboratory tests, including hematology and biochemistry, assessment of adverse events.

Before surgery: Multidisciplinary team discussion of surgical resectability and general operability, clinical and laboratory tests, including hematology and biochemistry, assessment of adverse events.

During maintenance treatment: Clinical and laboratory tests, including cardiac evaluation by ECG and echocardiography every three months.

During adjuvant/maintenance treatment and follow-up: CT-scan of thorax and abdomen every 6 months in year 1 and 2, yearly thereafter.

Sample size calculation and analysis populations: Based on the results in breast cancer, where the addition of trastuzumab to neoadjuvant treatment with docetaxel increased the total pathologic complete response in the primary tumor and axillary nodes (tpCR) from 19 to 38% [11], and where the addition of pertuzumab to the combination of trastuzumab and chemotherapy further increased pathologic tpCR from 31 to 45% [12], the primary objective of the “INNOVATION” trial is to detect an increase in the major pathological response rate of the primary tumor from 25 to 45% either with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab alone, or with chemotherapy plus the combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab. A comparative design with an increased one-sided type I error of 10% will be applied to test each experimental arm versus the control arm. To have 80% power to detect an increase from 25 to 45% in major pathological response rate between the control arm and each experimental arm using a Z-test for the comparison of two sample proportions with a one-sided type I error of 10%, 38 patients are required in the control arm and 76 patients in each experimental arm. A stepwise testing procedure will be used in order to avoid inflation of the one-sided type I error due to multiple testing. Therefore, the hypothesis of an increase in major pathological response rate with both trastuzumab and pertuzumab will first be tested using a one-sided type I error of 10%. If significant, the hypothesis of an increase in major pathological response rate with trastuzumab alone will be tested. As such, the overall one-sided type I error will be kept below 10%. Analysis populations are the following:

  • Per protocol population: All patients who are eligible and have started their allocated treatment (at least one dose of the study drug(s) planned as pre-operative treatment).

  • Safety population: All patients who have started their allocated treatment (at least one dose of the study drug(s) planned as pre-operative treatment).

  • Resected population: All eligible patients who have started the allocated pre-operative treatment, were operated and achieved a R0 or R1 resection.

The primary analysis of the major pathological response rate will be performed in the per protocol population with a non-missing assessment of pathological response. This includes all patients in the per protocol population who have had a resection and for whom the tumor regression according to Becker et al. has been assessed by the central pathology laboratory or who did not proceed to surgery or did not have a resection for any reason and therefore will be considered as not having a major pathological response in the analysis. Thus, missing data for the primary endpoint will only occur if a patient has had a resection and the central pathology review of the resection specimen is not possible for technical reasons e.g. if the resection specimen is not provided at all by the local pathologist or are not provided in sufficient quality or quantity. These patients will be excluded from the analysis. All reasonable efforts will be made to minimize this risk, e.g. the local pathologists will receive detailed information (written pathologist guidelines, web-based training) about the material and procedure necessary for central pathology review and will be asked to sign that he agrees to provide the material required according to protocol during the evaluation of the feasibility of the study in a center. Assessment of pathologic response will be performed independently by two senior pathologists specialized in gastrointestinal cancers, who will be blinded to treatment allocation. Inter-observer variability will be adjucidated by a third expert pathologist. In contrast, caregivers and patients will not be blinded to the allocated treatment. Randomization (both generation of the allocation sequence and assignment of participants to interventions) will be performed centrally by the EORTC computerized randomization system. Randomization between the three arms will continue until the required number of patients for the primary analysis is reached (38 patients in the control arm and 76 patients in each experimental arm). Using a safety margin of 10% in each arm, a maximum of 215 patients will have to be randomized in total. After analysis of the primary endpoint the advice of the EORTC Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) (https://www.eortc.org/governance/committees/) will be sought regarding the possible conduct of a phase III trial. Follow up will continue until death or for a minimum of 6 years after end of treatment.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol has been approved by the competent ethics committee as requested by the applicable national legislation. It is conducted in agreement with either the Declaration of Helsinki (available on the World Medical Association web site [21] and/or the laws and regulations of the country, whichever provides the greatest protection of the patient as well as according to the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline on Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP), available online at [22].

Written informed consent according to the above mentioned regulations is obtained prior to any study-related procedure by the investigator in each participating center.

Discussion

The development of HER2 targeting treatments for breast cancer is one of the greatest achievements in modern oncology, and permitted to improve median survival for patients with metastatic, HER2+ breast cancer from about 12 months to more than 50 months in a recently published trial [14].

Subsequently, HER2 targeting treatments were also developed in gastric cancer. Trastuzumab was the first targeted agent, which – when added to palliative chemotherapy – demonstrated a significant survival benefit in patients with metastatic GC [10], without the side effects of chemotherapy or other new safety signals. As such, it was a milestone in drug development. Whereas pertuzumab significantly improved survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer, this was not the case in patients with metastatic GC as reported in the JACOB-trial recently. Despite a survival benefit of 3.3 months, this was not statistically significant according to the hypothesis specified in the protocol. However, the question whether the integration of HER2 targeting drugs in perioperative chemotherapy may further improve treatment outcomes in patients with localized or locally advanced resectable GC remains one of the major open questions in the current management of GC patients. While trastuzumab is certainly the most promising drug to study in this indication, pertuzumab might still be able to increase the benefit of trastuzumab when given at an earlier time point in the evolution of this disease and for a longer time. The “INNOVATION”-trial has the advantage to assess the relative benefit of both trastuzumab and pertuzumab individually in the perioperative treatment of GC patients. In addition, as not all patients are eligible for treatment with FLOT, and given the currently limited experience of FLOT outside of Germany at present, “INNOVATION” will allow a preliminary estimation of the relative benefit of these antibodies with different chemotherapy backbones (CF and FOLFOX or CapOx).

In addition to systemic treatment, it is well established that the quality of surgery has a major impact on the patients’ outcome. Surgical quality assurance is therefore another key feature of this study protocol. An integrated approach [23, 24] has been adapted for this study through the central review by independent surgeons and pathologists from JCOG and EORTC. Data from surgical and pathology case report forms, pathology review, intraoperative photographs and macroscopic pictures of the resected specimen will be reviewed to assess completeness of surgical treatment. Thirty and 90 day surgical complications, graded by the Clavien-Dindo Classification [19], will also be reviewed.

Finally, assessment of histopathological tumor regression may be challenging as different tumor regression systems are used by local pathologists. To minimize the risk of bias, the primary endpoint, major pathological response, will be assessed centrally, by two expert gastrointestinal pathologists, according to a previously published, validated protocol [20], with discrepancies being resolved by a third expert gastrointestinal pathologist. As major pathological response rate remains a surrogate endpoint, the final decision to proceed with further development of trastuzumab and pertuzumab, either alone or in combination, in this indication will also consider other endpoints, such as safety, progression- free survival and overall survival.

Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the biology of gastric cancer biology differs significantly between Asian and Caucasian patients [25], and a large variability in the results of surgery [2, 4, 26] and several systemic treatments [27, 28] between different geographical regions has been observed since years. Thus, it is unclear if treatment benefits observed in one region of the world will have the same magnitude in other regions.

“INNOVATION” is a unique example of an academic, international, multidisciplinary collaboration of four leading academic groups in upper GI-cancer: EORTC, DUCG and KCSG, with JCOG being responsible for the surgical quality assurance, under the leadership of EORTC. Due to its design and recruitment in different European countries, as well as Korea and Singapore, “INNOVATION” will permit to estimate the relative benefit of perioperative HER2 targeted treatment with trastuzumab and pertuzumab individually in different geographical regions, and with different chemotherapy backbones and provide a rational basis for the design of future confirmatory studies in patients with resectable GC.

Abbreviations

Cape:

Capecitabine

CapOx:

Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin

CisPT:

Cisplatin

CT:

Chemotherapy

CT:

Computed tomography

CTCAE:

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Even

DUCG:

Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Group

ECF:

Epirubicine, Cisplatine and 5-FU

EORTC:

European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer

EUS:

Endoscopic ultrasound

FISH:

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

FLOT:

5-fluorouracil (FU), Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Taxotere

FOLFOX:

5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin

GC:

Gastric cancer

GCP:

Good clinical practice

GEJ:

Gastroesophageal junction

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2

ICH:

International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use

JCOG:

Japanese Clinical Oncology Group

KCSG:

Korean Cancer Study Group

mFOLFOX 6:

Modified FOLFOX 6

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

P:

Pertuzumab

RECIST:

Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors

T:

Trastuzumab

UICC:

International Union Against Cancer

References

  1. 1.

    IARC cancer fact sheets: gastric cancer. [Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/fact-sheets-cancers?cancer=5&type=0&sex=0. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.

  2. 2.

    Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20.

  3. 3.

    Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v38–49.

  4. 4.

    Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1810–20.

  5. 5.

    Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9813):315–21.

  6. 6.

    Al-Batran S. [Available from: http://oncologypro.esmo.org/Meeting-Resources/ESMO-2017-Congress/Docetaxel-oxaliplatin-and-fluorouracil-leucovorin-FLOT-for-resectable-esophagogastric-cancer-updated-results-from-multicenter-randomized-phase-3-FLOT4-AIO-trial-German-Gastric-Group-at-AIO.

  7. 7.

    Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C, Ott K, Fink U, Busch R, et al. Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2003;98(7):1521–30.

  8. 8.

    Ruschoff J, Hanna W, Bilous M, Hofmann M, Osamura RY, Penault-Llorca F, et al. HER2 testing in gastric cancer: a practical approach. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(5):637–50.

  9. 9.

    Hofmann M, Stoss O, Shi D, Buttner R, van de Vijver M, Kim W, et al. Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study. Histopathology. 2008;52(7):797–805.

  10. 10.

    Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):687–97.

  11. 11.

    Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, Manikhas A, Lluch A, Tjulandin S, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010;375(9712):377–84.

  12. 12.

    Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC, et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):25–32.

  13. 13.

    Baselga J, Cortes J, Kim SB, Im SA, Hegg R, Im YH, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(2):109–19.

  14. 14.

    Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, Ro J, Semiglazov V, Campone M, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):724–34.

  15. 15.

    Tabernero J, Hoff PM, Shen L, Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Cheng K, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (JACOB): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018.

  16. 16.

    Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, Chen J, Xiong J, Wang J, et al. Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(4):666–73.

  17. 17.

    Al-Batran SE, editor. Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil/leucovorin (FLOT) for resectable esophagogastric cancer: updated results from a multicenter phase III-study of the german gastric cancer group (AIO). Barcelona: ESMO; 2017.

  18. 18.

    Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):113–23.

  19. 19.

    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

  20. 20.

    Becker K, Langer R, Reim D, Novotny A, Meyer zum Buschenfelde C, Engel J, et al. Significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinomas: a summary of 480 cases. Ann Surg. 2011;253(5):934–9.

  21. 21.

    WMA. [Available from: http://www.wma.net. Accessed 17 Apr 2018.

  22. 22.

    ICH-GCP. [Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500002874.pdf. Accessed 13 Apr 2018.

  23. 23.

    Members of EQ. Working groups of scientific E. multidisciplinary quality assurance and control in oncological trials: Perspectives from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:91–100.

  24. 24.

    Wagner AD, Kang YK, Van Dieren J, Mauer M, Grabsch H, Caballero C, et al. 64. EORTC-1203: integration of trastuzumab, with or without pertuzumab, into perioperative chemotherapy of HER-2 positive stomach cancer: INNOVATION EudraCT number 2014-000722-38; NCT02205047. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(9):S91–S2.

  25. 25.

    Lin SJ, Gagnon-Bartsch JA, Tan IB, Earle S, Ruff L, Pettinger K, et al. Signatures of tumour immunity distinguish Asian and non-Asian gastric adenocarcinomas. Gut. 2015;64(11):1721–31.

  26. 26.

    Schuhmacher C, Gretschel S, Lordick F, Reichardt P, Hohenberger W, Eisenberger CF, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5210–8.

  27. 27.

    Pavlakis N, Sjoquist KM, Martin AJ, Tsobanis E, Yip S, Kang YK, et al. Regorafenib for the treatment of advanced Gastric Cancer (INTEGRATE): a multinational placebo-controlled phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(23):2728–35.

  28. 28.

    Hecht JR, Bang YJ, Qin SK, Chung HC, Xu JM, Park JO, et al. Lapatinib in combination with Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced or metastatic Gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: TRIO-013/LOGiC--A randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(5):443–51.

Download references

Available of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

This trial is supported by an educational grant by F. Hoffman La Roche to EORTC.

Author information

ADW, HIG, FL, MM have made significant contributions to the study conception and design and conduct of the trial, as well as the drafting of the manuscript. MM is the responsible statistician, HIG is the responsible pathologist, YKK and AC are coordinating investigators from the collaborating groups. MT is responsible for the surgical quality assurance from JCOG. CC and SM are clinical research physicians at EORTC and as such have made significant contributions to the study conception and conduct of the trial. PTP, LM, AE, MHM, UM, YKK, MT, FL made substantial contributions to the acquisition and analysis of data. ADW, HIG, MM, SM, CC, PTP, LM, AE, MHM, UM, YKK, SYR, AC, MT, FL have approved the submitted version and agreed to be both personally accountable for their own contribution and ensure that questions related to the accuracy and integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Correspondence to Anna Dorothea Wagner.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ information

ADW had the idea for this trial, has been coordinating the protocol development, is the coordinating investigator and responsible for the present paper. She is a senior lecturer and consultant at the University Hospital of Lausanne, where she is head of the upper gastrointestinal cancer unit in the department of oncology. In addition, she is chair of the EORTC GI GROUP gastric task force (together with MHM).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study protocol has been approved by the competent ethics committees in all participating countries as requested by the applicable national legislation. Full names of the ethics committees, including the institution to which it belong, as well as approval dates and reference numbers of all ethics approvals are listed on the supplementary file. It is conducted in agreement with either the Declaration of Helsinki (available on the World Medical Association web site [21]) and/or the laws and regulations of the country, whichever provides the greatest protection of the patient as well as according to the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline on Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP), available online at [22]. All patients gave written informed consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Item 2b: All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data Set (if not described in the protocol text).

Primary registry and trial identifying number, including date of registration and secondary identifying numbers: see abstract.

Primary sponsor: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Avenue E. Mounierlaan 83/11, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgique. Email:eortc@eortc.be, https://www.eortc.org.

Secondary sponsor: see declarations. The trial is supported by an educational grant by F. Hoffmann La Roche to EORTC.

Contact for public queries: 1203@eortc.be

Contact for scientific queries: 1203@eortc.be

Public title: EORTC-1203-GITCG: INNOVATION-trial.

Scientific title: Integration of trastuzumab, with or without pertuzumab, into perioperative chemotherapy of HER-2 posiTIve stomach cancer: the INNOVATION-TRIAL.

Countries of recruitment (as of 19.09.2018): South Korea, Germany, Estonia, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, France, Israel, Switzerland, Norway, Portugal, Belgium.

Health condition or problem studied: HER-2 positive, gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Interventions: see methods.

Key inclusion and exclusion criteria: see methods.

Study type: Interventional, Allocation: randomized. Masking: single blind (outcomes assessor). Primary purpose: treatment, phase II.

Date of first enrolment: 01.12.2015.

Target sample size: n=215

Recruitment status: 69 patients as of 19.09.2018.

Primary outcomes: see methods.

Key secondary outcomes: see methods

Appendix 2

Summary of protocol changes from protocol v3.0 to 4.0

- Change of chemotherapy backbone: in Europe, the regimen will be selected between FLOT, CapOX por mFOLFOX6; in Asia, cisplatin +capecitabine or 5-FU.

This scientific amendment was necessary after the presentation of the results of the FLOT-4-trial at ASCO 2017, which demonstrated a significantly better progression-free and overall survival for perioperative treatment with FLOT, as compared to ECF. Both, dose modification and supportive care recommendations for treatment with FLOT have been inspired by those used in the FLOT-4 study, which were generously provided by the author. Cisplatin is being kept as an option as it is still standard of care in Korea, and efficacy benefit of other regimen yet have to be demonstrated in these patients (section 4 trial design, page 28; therapeutic drug regimen, section 5; newly added Appendix L).

- A safety run has been introduced in the protocol, given the change of background chemotherapies (section 4.1).

- A definition of ‘high dose corticosteroids’ was inserted (section 3.2).

- Clarification was added, that DPD testing should be done according to local guidelines (section 3.2; section 5.4.5.1.1).

- Dose reduction upon grade 2 or 3 nausea or vomiting has been adapted (appendix L for Cisplatin-treated patients).

- Recommendations regarding the procedures in case of tubular damage and low Mg/Ca were added in Table 9 (Appendix L).

- Measures to be taken after assessment of ototoxicity and sensory neural damage were clarified (Appendix L, section ‘Other precautions’).

Furthermore:

- The numbers of treatment cycles and timelines for follow-up have been clarified and made consistent between the protocol and PISIC.

- For enrolled patients, the side effects and toxicities have been updated in the protocol and PISIC based on the new versions of the IBs of Pertuzumab.

and Trastuzumab.

- A PISIC specific to the new chemotherapy backbone has been created, while the Cisplatin-only PISIC remains valid for Asian patients, as well as already registered patients.

- The RECIST criteria have been added in the protocol.

- Additional clarifications, update of contact information and administrative corrections have been implemented.

Summary of changes from protocol v4.0 to 4.1:

Clarifications included in the protocol about:

- Time Window for tests during the follow up period.

- Treatment administration in case of delay for initiating the adjuvant treatment.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, A.D., Grabsch, H.I., Mauer, M. et al. EORTC-1203-GITCG - the “INNOVATION”-trial: Effect of chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, versus chemotherapy plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, in the perioperative treatment of HER2 positive, gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma on pathologic response rate: a randomized phase II-intergroup trial of the EORTC-Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, Korean Cancer Study Group and Dutch Upper GI-Cancer group. BMC Cancer 19, 494 (2019) doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5675-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • Gastro-esophageal junction cancer
  • Perioperative chemotherapy
  • Trastuzumab
  • Pertuzumab
  • HER2