Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: the significance of high risk features

BMC Cancer201717:142

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3120-0

Received: 23 January 2016

Accepted: 7 February 2017

Published: 16 February 2017

Abstract

Background

Papillary carcinomas that measure 1.0cm or less are diagnosed as papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMs). The clinical significance and recommendations for management of these PTMs is still evolving. The objective of the study was to compare the characteristics of small (<5mm) to large (≥ 5mm) papillary thyroid microcarcinomas.

Methods

Amongst 1459 sequential patients undergoing thyroid surgery at a single center, 132 (9%) cases were diagnosed with PTM. We performed a retrospective analysis of these cases using Fisher’s Exact Test. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 a priori.

Results

A relationship between large PTM and high risk features was observed only for extra-thyroidal cancer extension (ETE). Six of 57 large PTM (11%) but none of the 75 small PTM had ETE (p < 0.01). Lymph node metastases were associated with both small PTM (5/9 cases) and large PTM (4/9 cases). A distant metastases was diagnosed in association with a small PTM.

Conclusions

For PTM, neither small cancer size, nor the absence of high-risk features, excluded the possibility of synchronous lymph node metastases.

Keywords

Thyroid Cancer Thyroid Carcinoma Papillary Carcinoma Microcarcinoma Prognosis

Background

Multiple reports have identified a rising incidence of thyroid cancer over the past several decades, primarily due to the diagnosis of small papillary carcinomas [1, 2]. According to the World Health Organization, papillary carcinomas that measure 1.0cm or less are diagnosed as papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMs) [3]. Recent work has suggested that PTMs are the most commonly diagnosed thyroid cancers in individuals who are older than 45 years, and accounts for almost one quarter of new diagnoses [1]. The clinical significance and recommendations for management of these PTMs is still evolving. In general, PTM is considered a clinically very low risk cancer type that uncommonly causes mortality, with a greater than 90% disease-free survival after long term follow up [2, 4, 5]. Reported rates for distant metastases and mortality from PTM are <0.05% [6]. However, some PTMs exhibit aggressive behaviour, including the development of a regional and distant metastases, and even death [7, 8].

The rising incidence of PTM, and its associated morbidity, requires risk stratification and guidelines for treatment. Currently, treatment of PTM is based upon stratification of cancer risk for aggressive behaviour, which is based on patient and cancer characteristics [2, 4]. Cancers considered high risk include those that are: multifocal, have extrathyroidal extension, have vascular invasion, are incompletely resected, have lymph node metastases, especially if multiple nodes are involved, nodes are > 3cm in largest dimension, or if extra-nodal cancer extension is present, and if distant metastases are present. The presence of these high risk features in a PTM influences the extent of surgery required for treatment [9]. Small PTM size (< 5mm versus ≥ 5mm) has also been suggested as being important for risk stratification, with some reports identifying PTMs ≥ 5mm as being more likely to have high risk features [8, 10, 11].

The objective of this study was to determine if small PTMs (size < 5mm) are clinically and pathologically different from larger PTMs (size 5mm- ≤ 10mm).

Methods

The study protocol was approved by our Research Ethics Board. This study was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively between 2002 and 2012 for 1459 sequential patients undergoing thyroid surgery at St. Paul’s Hospital, a single tertiary care/academic teaching hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Analysis was limited to cases where pathology identified a PTM of ≤ 1cm without the presence of an associated macrocarcinoma (> 1cm). Applying this inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 132 cases for analysis. This cohort was then examined based on four clinical and five histopathological characteristics. Clinical variables evaluated were: age (< 45 versus ≥ 45 years), gender (male versus female), surgery performed (total thyroidectomy versus thyroid lobectomy), and surgical indication (benign disease versus known or suspected cancer). Surgical indication was based on pre-operative fine need aspiration (FNAB) and/or imaging findings. Diagnosis of suspicion of malignancy was based upon FNAB diagnosis of nodules, or pre-operative imaging suspicious for local or distant metastases. Histopathological variables evaluated were: cancer multifocality, cancer bilaterality, extra-thyroidal cancer extension, and the presence of local and distant cancer metastases, all based on histopathological reports. Cancers were considered multifocal if ≥ 2 foci were found in one or both thyroid lobes. Size in millimeters (< 5mm vs ≥ 5mm) was the independent variable. The subtype histology of the PTMs were not available for all cases and was not included in the overall analysis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences between groups were determined using the Chi Square and Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically different and a priori. Analysis was performed in R.

Results

One hundred thirty-two of 1459 patients (9%) met study inclusion criteria and made up the study patient population.

Clinical characteristics

The clinical characteristics and treatment of the study patient population is summarized in Table 1. Of the 132 patients included, there were 105 (80%) women and 27 (20%) men. The mean age at the time of their procedure was 50.2 years (range 23–74 years) with 48 patients (36%) being less than 45 years old and 84 patients (64%) being aged 45 years or older. The surgical procedure was a total thyroidectomy for 63 patients (48%) and thyroid lobectomy for 69 patients (52%). Indication for surgery was for presumed benign disease in 33 cases (25%) and for suspicion of or confirmed malignant disease in 99 cases (75%). The suspicion of malignancy was generally due to an intermediate Fine needle aspiration biopsy of an associated thyroid nodule > 1cm. Benign pathology included goiter, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, thyroid cyst, hyperplastic nodules, and Hurthe cell adenomas, all with PTM that was identified incidentally. All cases with confirmed malignancy pre-operatively were papillary thyroid cancer.
Table 1

Papillary Microcarcinoma Patient and Operative Characteristics

Patient and operative characteristics

< 5mm

n = 75

≥ 5mm

n = 57

Total N = 132

Chi square

Age

 <45

22

26

48 (36%)

p = 0.08

 ≥45

53

31

84 (64%)

Gender

 Male

11

16

27 (20%)

p = 0.09

 Female

64

41

105 (80%)

Surgery

 Total Thyroidectomy

37

26

63 (48%)

p = 0.80

 Thyroid Lobectomy

38

31

69 (52%)

Surgical Indication

 Benign

20

13

33 (25%)

p = 0.76

 Malignant

55

44

99 (75%)

Benign pathology included goiter, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, thyroid cyst, hyperplastic nodules, and Hurthe cell adenomas associated with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Malignant pathology (confirmed or suspected) was based on fine needle aspiration biopsy of nodules or pre-operative imaging. All cases with confirmed malignancy pre-operatively were papillary thyroid cancer

At least 1 histopathologic high risk feature was identified in 45 patients (34%). Twenty-seven patients (20%) had 1 high-risk feature, 14 patients (11%) had 2 high risk features and 4 (3%) had 3 high risk features. No patients had 4 or 5 high risk histopathologic features. Multifocality was identified in 29 patients (28%), bilaterality in 8 patients (6% of total, 27% with multifocal disease), extrathyroidal cancer extension in 6 patients (5%), lymph node metastases present at diagnosis in 9 patients (7%) and distant metastases present at diagnosis in 1 patient (0.7%). The study population’s characteristics are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

High Risk Characteristics of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma Patient Population

High Risk Feature

<5 mm

n = 75(%)

≥ 5mm

n = 57(%)

Total (% of 132)

Chi square/Fisher’s

Cancer Bilaterality

6 (8)

2 (4)

8 (6)

0.48

Cancer Multifocality

21(28)

17 (30)

38 (29)

0.97

Extrathyroidal Cancer Extension

0 (0)

6 (11)

6 (5)

p = 0.005

Lymph Node Metastases

5 (7)

4 (7)

9 (7)

0.78

Distant Metastases

1 (1)

0 (0)

1 (0.7)

0.89

Total

24

29

53

 
Chi square or Fisher’s Exact test comparison for patient and surgical variables of interest failed to identify a difference between small or large PTM (Table 1). Examination of high risk features revealed that extrathyroidal cancer extension was present significantly more often in large PTM (p = 0.005). Other high risk features were not differentially identified based on cancer size (Table 2). The 9 patients who had lymph node metastases present at the time of their cancer diagnosis were further studied. Six of nine patients (67%) had bilateral disease and two of the six also had extrathyroidal extension (both large PTM), while two others had associated bilateral disease (both small PTM), including one patient with distant metastases from a 3mm cancer. Three of the nine patients (33%) had lymph node metastases in the absence of any high risk features (Table 3).
Table 3

Patient Population With Lymph Node Metastases

Pt

Age

Size mm

Histology

Bilateral

Multifocal

ETE

LN Mets

Dis

Mets

7

< 45

9

PTMC

+

1

< 45

8

PTMCvF

+

+

+

8

45

6

PTMC

+

3

≥ 45

5

PTMC

+

+

+

2

≥ 45

3

PTMCvS

+

+

+

5

< 45

3

PTMC

+

+

6

≥ 45

3

PTMCvF

+

+

+

+

4

≥ 45

2.5

PTMCvS

+

+

9

45

2

PMTCvF

+

Pt patient, Bilateral bilaterality, Multifocal multifocality, ETE extra-thyroidal extension, LN Mets lymph node metastasis, Dis Mets distant metastasis, PTMC papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, vF variant follicular, vS variant sclerosing

+, present; -, absent

Bold values, LN metastasis in absence of any other high risk features

Discussion

PTM diagnosis is very common with almost half of all new papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) diagnoses being a PTM. Following thyroid surgery, pathologic identification of PTM ranges from 1–24% of surgical specimens [2, 5, 10], and 6–36% of autopsy specimens [2, 5]. Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database revealed that PTM in patients older than 45 years is now the most commonly diagnosed PTC [1]. Our observed rate of PTM diagnosed from surgical specimens in the absence of a thyroid macrocarcinoma was 9%, and was consistent with Canadian autopsy (6%) [12], international autopsy (3–18%) [2] and pathology data (1–24%) depending on the extent of surgical resection [2, 11].

Guidelines regarding the surgical management of PTC have continued to evolve and are currently based on clinical and pathological characteristics of the diagnosed individual and their thyroid cancer, respectively [9}. However, debate still exists regarding whether PTM should be managed in a manner similar to larger PTC [4]. PTM usually has an excellent prognosis and current American Thyroid Association Guidelines recommend that thyroid lobectomy alone is adequate treatment for unifocal intrathyroiodal cancers in the absence of a prior history of head and neck irradiation, familial thyroid carcinoma, or clinically detectable cervical metastases. As there are no features of PTM that can reliably identify the small subset of patients who will go on to develop clinically significant cancer progression, an active surveillance approach that involves close clinical and ultrasound PTM follow up, has currently not been adopted by the vast majority of centers [9]. An observational study, with non-surgical management of PTM, reported 3mm of growth in 6% of patients, with 1.4% of patients developing lateral lymph node metastases at 5 years of follow-up. These authors have suggested non-operative management of PTM in the absence of high risk features [13]. However, other groups have encouraged a surgical approach, which has shifted from thyroid lobectomy to total thyroidectomy, and some groups even recommend nodal dissection of the central neck. Proponents of the latter approach recognize the relationship between high risk features and disease recurrence [14, 15].

High risk features are often present in PTM and one-third of our patients had at least 1 high risk feature identified after pathological examination. While distant metastases were uncommon in our series (< 1%), consistent with other reports [6], multifocality was observed in almost a third of cases (28%) and 27% of these cases had bilateral disease. Reported multifocality rates for PTM have ranged from 15–43% [2, 15], with contralateral malignancy identified in up to 53% of cases [16]. Interestingly, multifocality is believed to reflect multiple independent tumors of different clonal origin, as opposed to intraglandular cancer metastases [17]. While the incidence of PTC multifocality is not related to tumor size [18] as we observed in the current study, it has been reported to be an independent risk factor for cancer recurrence [6, 17]. However, the prognostic significance of contralateral PTM is controversial. Given that only 5–10% of the PTCs recur, some investigators have suggested that recurrence can be treated when detected clinically, while other investigators have argued that reoperative surgery carries additional risks that need to be weighted appropriately [14]. The presence of lymph node metastases at the time of diagnosis also influences cancer recurrence risk and has been reported in 5–51% of cases [2, 15]. The current study observed a 7% rate of nodal disease at the time of PTC diagnosis is at the lower end of this range, but is consistent with the 9% nodal disease risk that has been recently associated with PTM [15]. This low rate of lymph node metastases may be an underestimate as the practice of central neck dissection for these cases is variable. Long-term follow-up of PTM has found that the presence of multifocality and lymph node metastases at diagnoses increases the risk of developing subsequent nodal disease, 11% of multifocal PTM recurred compared with 4% of unifocal PTM tumors [19].

Three of nine patients diagnosed with lymph node metastases at the time of their diagnosis had no other high risk features present. The presence of nodal metastasis in association with PTM is believed to represent different underlying cancer biology when compared with PTM not associated with nodal metastases [5]. Aggressive biological behavior may be related to molecular characteristics not yet well understood. Recent reports have identified molecular BRAF mutations, present in 17–52% of PTM, as potential early genetic lesions in PTC [2, 20]. Presence of BRAF mutations are associated with high risk features, including extrathyroidal cancer extension (ETE) and multifocality, and are also predictive of an increased risk of lateral compartment nodal disease [20]. Lin and colleagues have suggested that pre-operative screening for BRAF mutation using fine needle aspirate biopsy could potentially guide the initial treatment of PTM, with positive BRAF status requiring more aggressive therapy [20]. Other recent studies have found that combining BRAF mutations with a panel of other molecular prognosticators may improve its clinical utility [9].

Some investigators have reported that the tumor size of PTM (< 5 vs ≥ 5mm) may be related to aggressive cancer behavior, with larger PTMs being more likely to have high risk features and nodal metastasis [10, 21]. Other groups have found no relationship between PTM size and the presence of high risk features [22, 23]. Our study found that the size of PTM had little relationship with the presence of high risk features. Only ETE was significantly more commonly present in larger than smaller PTM. While the overall rate of ETE was low (5%), these observations were consistent with prior reports (2–21%) [2, 5]. Kim et al. [24] found that the presence of ETE was directly related to the PTM size but not with the risk of cancer recurrence. Other groups have evaluated the relationship between cancer size and high risk features concluded that PTM size did not influence patient outcomes [10, 21].

The current study has several limitations. It is a retrospective analysis from a single institution and results may not be generalizable to all populations. However, the prospective data collection from a multi-cultural catchment area in a publically funded health care system provides support of the representative nature of the sample. The incidental identification of PTC after surgery for benign disease implies that lymph nodes could be under-sampled, and presence of metastatic disease may be higher than our results suggest. As well, outcome and follow-up data is not available and thus no prognostic information can be inferred from this analysis.

Conclusions

The diagnosis of PTM after thyroid surgery presents the thyroid cancer management team with a dilemma. Neither PTM size, nor the absence of high risk features, excluded the possibility of synchronous lymph node metastases. While some argue that high risk features should prompt surgical management consistent with PTC >1cm, further study that includes the evaluation of the role of thyroid cancer molecular prognostications is required in order to identify the optimal management algorithm for this common endocrine malignancy.

Abbreviations

PTM: 

Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

PTC: 

Papillary thyroid cancer

ETE: 

Extrathyroidal cancer extension

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Jeremy Hamm, Biostatistician, for his assistance with data analysis in this study.

Funding

This research study has not received any funding support from any source.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

NB carried out the literature search, drafted the tables, collected data, analysed data, data interpreted data, and drafted the manuscript. SMW designed the study, collected data, analysed data, interpreted data, and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Both study authors can be contacted at: Department of Surgery, St. Paul’s Hospital & University of British Columbia, Current Address: 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6.

Competing interests

No funding was received for this research study and there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Consent to publication

As no details/images/videos that would allow for identification of study participants are presented in this work Consent for Publication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved and consent to participate was obtained by the ethics committee of Providence Health Care Research Ethics Board of St. Paul’s Hospital and University of British Columbia. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Additional details

This study was presented at the 82nd American Thyroid Association Annual Meeting, September 19–21, 2012, Quebec City, Canada.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, St. Paul’s Hospital & University of British Columbia, St. Paul’s Hospital Department of Surgery

References

  1. Hughes DT, Haymart MR, Miller BS, et al. The most commonly occurring papillary thyroid cancer in the United States is now a microcarcinoma in a patient older than 45 years. Thyroid. 2011;3:231–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Pacini F. Thyroid microcarcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;26(4):421–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization. Classificiation of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Endocrine Organs. 3rd ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  4. Plzák J, Astl J, Psychogios G, et al. Current treatment strategies for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. HNO. 2013;61(4):300–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pazaitout-Panayoitou K, Capezzone M, Pacini F. Clinical features and therapeutic implication of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Thyroid. 2007;17:1085–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Roti E, Degli Uberti EC, Bondanelli M, et al. Thyroid papillary microcarcinoma: a descriptive and meta-analysis study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;159:659–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pellegriti G, Scollo C, Lumera G, et al. Clinical behavior and outcome of papillary thyroid cancers smaller than 1.5 cm in diameter: study of 299 cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;8:3713–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Malandrino P, Pellegriti G, Attard M, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinomas: A comparative study of the characteristics and risk factors at presentation in two cancer registries. J Clin Endocrinol Metabl. 2013;98(4):1427–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Haugen E, Alexander E, Bible K, et al. American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2015;26(1):1–133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wada N, Duh QY, Sugino K, et al. Lymph node metastasis from 259 papillary thyroid microcarcinomas: frequency, pattern of occurrence and recurrence, and optimal strategy for neck dissection. Ann Surg. 2003;237(3):399–407.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Lombardi C, Bellantone R, De Crea C, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metaseases, and risk factors for recurrence in a high prevalence of goiter area. World J Surg. 2010;34:1214–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fukanaga FH, Yatani R. Geographic patholgy of occult thyroid carcinomas. Cancer. 1975;36:1095–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ito Y, Uruno T, Nakano K, et al. An observational trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid. 2003;13:381–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ricci JA, Alfonso AE. Multifocal micropapillary thyroid cancer: A new indication for total thyroidectomy? Am Surg. 2003;78:1211–4.Google Scholar
  15. Karatzas T, Vaseileidadis I, Kapetanakis S, et al. Risk factors contributing to the difference in prognosis for papillary versus micropapillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2013;206:586–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pitt SC, Sippel RS, Chen H. Contralateral papillary thyroid cancer: does size matter? Am J Surg. 2009;197:342–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Bansal M, Mantha G, Nikforov YE. Molecular and histopathological features of multifocal papillary thyroid cancinomas. Mod Pathol. 2010;23:126A–33A.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Arora N, Turbendian HK, Kato MA, et al. Papillary thyroid carcinoma and microcarcinoma: is there a need to distinguish the two? Thyroid. 2009;19:473–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hay ID, Hutchinson ME, Gonzalez-Losada T, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a study of 900 cases observed in a 60-year period. Surgery. 2008;144:980–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin KL, Wang OC, Zhang XH, et al. The BRAF mutation is predictive of aggressive clinicopathological characteristics in papillary thryoid microcarcinoma. Ann Surg Onocol. 2010;17:3924–30.Google Scholar
  21. Lo CY, Chan WF, Lang BH, et al. Papillary microcarcinoma: is there any difference between clinically overt and occult tumors? World J Surg. 2006;30(5):759–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chow SM, Law SC, Chan JK, et al. Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid - Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases and multifocality. Cancer. 2003;98:31–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pellizzo MR, Boschin IM, Toniato A, et al. Natural history, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PMTC): a mono-institutional 12-year experience. Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25(6):547–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim JM, Lee YY. Choi, et al. The clinical importance of minimal extrathyroid extension on tumor recurrence in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinol Metab. 2010;25(4):340–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017