Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Low glycemic index diet, exercise and vitamin D to reduce breast cancer recurrence (DEDiCa): design of a clinical trial

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 5,
  • 6,
  • 6,
  • 6,
  • 7, 8,
  • 9,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 10,
  • 11,
  • 2, 11, 12,
  • 2, 11, 13, 14,
  • 1, 15 and
  • 1
BMC Cancer201717:69

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3064-4

©  The Author(s). 2017

  • Received: 21 September 2016
  • Accepted: 13 January 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Mechanisms influencing breast cancer (BC) development and recurrence include hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, high insulin-like growth factor-1, high circulating estrogen, inflammation and impaired cellular differentiation/apoptosis. A lifestyle program that targets all the above mechanisms may be warranted. Low glycemic index (GI) foods produce lower post-prandial glucose and insulin responses and have been associated with lower BC risk. Moderate physical activity post-diagnosis reduces BC recurrence and mortality, partly explained by reduced insulin and estrogen levels. Vitamin D increases cell differentiation/apoptosis and high serum vitamin D levels improve BC survival. Yet no trial has evaluated the combined effect of a low GI diet, moderate physical activity and vitamin D supplementation on BC recurrence in the context of a Mediterranean lifestyle setting.

Methods

Women (30-74 yr) who had undergone surgery for primary histologically confirmed BC (stages I-III) within the previous 12 months, in cancer centres in Italy, will be randomized to follow, for a maximum of 33 months, either a high intensity treatment (HIT) composed of low GI diet + exercise + vitamin D (60 ng/mL serum concentration) or a lower intensity treatment (LITE) with general advice to follow a healthy diet and exercise pattern + vitamin D to avoid insufficiency. Both interventions are on a background of a Mediterranean diet. Considering a 20% recurrence rate within 3 years for BC cases and a predicted rate of 10% in the HIT group, with power of 80% and two-sided alpha of 0.05, the subject number required will be 506 (n = 253 in each arm). Clinic visits will be scheduled every 3 months. Dietary and exercise counselling and vitamin D supplements will be given at each clinic visit when blood samples, anthropometric measures and 7-day food records will be collected.

Discussion

DEDiCa study aims to reduce BC recurrence in women with BC using a lifestyle approach with additional vitamin D and to investigate possible cardio-metabolic benefits as well as epigenetic modifications according to lifestyle changes. Given the supporting evidence and safety of the components of our intervention we believe it is feasible and urgent to test it in cancer patients.

Trial registration

May 11, 2016; NCT02786875.

EudraCT Number

2015-005147-14

Keywords

  • Dietary glycemic index
  • Mediterranean diet
  • Exercise
  • Vitamin D
  • Breast cancer recurrence
  • Disease-free survival
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Diabetes
  • Risk factors

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and the 5-year survival rate in Europe is 82% suggesting a considerable residual risk [1]. BC is associated also with other chronic conditions including type two diabetes which may increase the risk of BC recurrence [2–4] and many BC patients are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) [5, 6]. Mechanisms of BC appear to be linked to sex hormones, impairment in glucose metabolism, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin-like growth factors (IGF), inflammation, oxidative stress and impaired cell apoptosis [7, 8]. Current advice to BC survivors suggests adopting cancer prevention strategies [8, 9], however there is no consensus on the effectiveness of lifestyle programs in women with BC [10–12] mostly due to lack of sufficient evidence [13]. The rationale for the study is to target several mechanisms of cancer suppression or proliferation, with a healthy diet and exercise program, to avoid low vitamin D levels in order to obtain maximal efficacy of the lifestyle program, and concomitantly to offer maximal CVD and diabetes protection. Dietary carbohydrates are the main food components to affect glycemia and insulinemia. The glycemic index (GI) is able to capture the difference between those that increase glycemia the most (high GI foods) and those that increase it the least (low GI foods) [14]. Low GI foods lower the glycemic and insulinemic potential of the diet and have been shown to reduce the risk of several cancers particularly diabetes-related cancers including BC [15–18] and some evidence suggests they also correlate with lower recurrence [19]. Furthermore, low GI diets have been inversely associated with risk of type two diabetes [15, 20, 21] and CVD [22, 23] and favourably modified blood glucose [24–26], blood lipids [27], inflammatory markers [28], oxidative damage [29], body weight [30] and IGF binding proteins [31], all factors relevant to carcinogenesis, diabetes and CVD. Our previous studies in Italy have shown significant risk reduction of 40% with a low GI diet compared to a high GI diet in BC primary prevention [18]. Physical activity is one of the mainstays of primary prevention of cancer and it is also included in guidelines for BC survivors (at least 150 minutes per week) mainly to reduce complications such as lower muscle strength and risk of depression [13]. However, physical activity after BC diagnosis has also been shown to reduce the risk of BC mortality by 40–50% particularly when it is of moderate intensity such as 30 minutes of brisk walking per day [32–35] an effect possibly modulated partly by insulin economy improvements in reduced insulin, insulin-like growth factors and estrogen levels [36].

To maximize lifestyle changes it may be useful to avoid vitamin deficiencies, particularly vitamin D deficiency which has been linked to higher breast cancer risk [37, 38]. Vitamin D alters genes implicated in cellular growth, affecting proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis [37]. Preliminary studies suggest that normal-high ranges of serum vitamin D levels improve BC survival [39, 40].

Low glycemic index diet, exercise and vitamin D intake, in addition to determining metabolic changes and benefits for cancer patients, may be able to change the tumor microenvironment and lead to epigenetic modifications [41–44]. In this context, microRNAs (miRNAs), small noncoding RNA molecules, may play a fundamental role in modulating gene expression and breast cancer progression [45, 46]. The evaluation of circulating miRNAs is useful to identify the change of specific miRNAs involved in cancer pathways and predict the development of recurrence in breast cancer patients.

A lifestyle program that targets all the above mechanisms may be warranted. To our knowledge no trial has evaluated the combined effect of a lifestyle program with a healthy diet focusing on low GI, additional physical activity and supplemental vitamin D on BC recurrence and complications in the context of a Mediterranean dietary setting.

Methods/Design

Aims and objectives

DEDiCa study aims primarily at reducing BC recurrence in women with BC using a lifestyle approach with additional vitamin D. The primary objective of DEDiCa study is to determine the effect of a 33-month program combining advice on diet, exercise and supplemental vitamin D, on reducing BC recurrence rates or increasing disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives are to improve markers of diabetes risk and management for those who already have diabetes, to improve cardiometabolic health and quality of life (QoL) and to investigate whether changes in microRNA correlate with changes in lifestyle.

Study design

This is a randomized clinical trial targeting women with BC stages I-III within 12 months from BC surgery (see Tables 1 and 2 for details). The study involves at least five cancer centers in Italy (Table 3) and it started on Oct 10th, 2016. Consenting participants are randomized to either a high intensity program (HIT) or a lower intensity program (LITE, positive control). The endpoints will be assessed at baseline and every three months until the end of the study (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

1. Women with primary diagnosis of histologically confirmed breast cancer (T1 with Ki67 ≥ 30%, T2, T3 without metastasis) within 12 months from diagnosis.

2. Age ≥ 30 and < 75 years.

3. Patients who are able to comprehend and are willing to sign the consent form and are able to adhere to the protocol including scheduled clinic visits and assigned treatment.

1. Patients who do not possess the inclusion criteria for this study.

2. Patients with sarcoidosis or other granulomatous diseases or with hypercalcemia (Ca > 11 mg/dL).

3. Patients with any previous or current concomitant malignant cancer.

4. Pregnant or lactating women.

5. Patients with AIDS diagnosis

6. Patients with severe renal insufficiency

7. Patients with kidney stones (nephrocalcinosis or nephrolithiasis)

8. Patients participating in other lifestyle clinical trials

Table 2

Details of inclusion criteria n. 1

Stage

Primary Tumor

Lymph nodes

Metastasis

Ki-67

I

T1b, T1c

N0

M0

≥30%

IIA

T1a, T1b, T1c

T2

N1

N0

M0

M0

any

IIB

T2

T3

N1

N0

M0

M0

any

IIIA

T1a, T1b, T1c

T2

T3

N2

N2

N1, N2

M0

M0

M0

any

IIIC

T1a, T1b, T1c

T2

T3

N3

N3

N3

M0

M0

M0

any

Table 3

List of recruiting centres in Italy

Recruiting centres

• Coordinating Centre: National Cancer Institute Fondazione G. Pascale (Napoli);

○ Via Mariano Semmola – 80131 Napoli

○ Tel: 081/5903395

○ Email: epidemiologia@istitutotumori.na.it

○ www.istitutotumori.na.it/

• Clinica Mediterranea, Senology Unit; Via Orazio, 2–80122 Napoli; www.clinicamediterranea.it/

• Cannizzaro Hospital, Senology Unit; Via Messina, 829–95126 Catania; www.aocannizzaro.it/

• San Vincenzo Hospital of Taormina, Oncology Unit; Via Sirina, 98039 Taormina (Messina); www.oncologiataormina.it/

• National Cancer Institute CRO Aviano; Via Franco Gallini, 2–33081 Aviano (Pordenone); www.cro.it

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of DEDiCa study protocol

To improve compliance participants on both sides will be followed equally with blood tests and clinic visits and will be equally offered general advice on a healthy Mediterranean diet and physical activity, step counters and vitamin D supplements to avoid insufficiency. Participants in the HIT group will additionally receive dietary counselling on how to reduce the GI of their diet, packages of pasta, more in-depth advice on exercise and more vitamin D supplements compared to the LITE group.

This study was approved by the ethic board of the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA), and of each recruiting hospital: National Cancer Institute “Fondazione Giovanni Pascale” in Naples, Azienda Ospedaliera per l’Emergenza Ospedale Cannizzaro in Catania, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico “G. Martino” in Messina for San Vincenzo Hospital of Taormina, Comitato Etico Campania Centro ASL NA1 Centro for Clinica Mediterranea in Naples. The study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration date and number: May 11, 2016; NCT02786875).

Participants

Women who had undergone surgery for primary histologically confirmed BC, stages I-III (see Tables 1 and 2 for details), within the previous 12 months in cancer centres in Italy, who are between the ages 30–74 years and have no contraindications to participate in this study will be eligible to participate. Eligibility is confirmed by central reviewing of medical records and pathology reports. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized in Table 1. To participate in the study each potential participant is required to read and sign the study information/consent form at baseline.

Recruitment and randomization

Eligible participants are recruited in five oncologic centres in Italy (four in Southern Italy and one in Northern Italy). Details of the recruiting centres can be found in Table 3. Eligible participants are contacted either by phone or during one of their follow-up visits and offered to hear more about the study during an information session (either group session or a one-to-one session to accommodate all needs). Eligible participants are explained the study details and are given an informed consent document to take home which they bring back at the baseline visit. At the baseline visit, after obtaining written consent the participant is sent for a blood test and other measurements, is randomized to one of the two arms of the study, receives the advice on the program according to her randomization arm and is given the next appointment slip. Participants are contacted by phone monthly for the first three months and once between visits afterwards. Study visits are scheduled every 3 months until end of study (33 months).

Randomization is done electronically in real time for all recruiting centres and is stratified by stage (I/IIA vs. IIB/IIIA) and age (<50 yrs or ≥50 yrs) at diagnosis and is based on a permuted block design with block size of 4. Stratification by stage and age is done because we expect these variables to affect the outcomes. To prevent any possible study bias the randomization sequence will be done off-site by a third party statistician (Contract Research Organization, Naples, Italy) who will not have contacts with the study participants. The PI is blinded to the randomization of the study participants but not the staff involved in the clinic visits.

Interventions

Eligible and consenting subjects are randomized to either one of the two treatment programs (higher or lower intensity):
  • Higher intensity (HIT) arm (test): low GI diet + exercise + vitamin D.
    1. 1)

      All carbohydrate foods advised will be low GI choices (GI < 70, on the bread scale), e.g. legumes, pasta al dente, barley, low GI rice, low GI bread, oat, apples, oranges, berries, avocado and nuts.

       
    2. 2)

      Brisk walk of at least 30 min per day (or approximately 5000 steps) more than the habitual physical activity.

       
    3. 3)

      Vitamin D supplement (cholecalciferol) up to 4000 IU/day to reach the upper end of normal blood levels of 25(OH)D (60 ng/ml).

       

  • Lower intensity (LITE) arm (positive control): general recommendations for a healthy diet and physical activity. Vitamin D (cholecalciferol) will be given only if hypovitaminosis D is detected to bring blood levels up to normal ranges of 30 ng/mL.

Both groups will be counselled to follow a healthy Mediterranean diet (≥5 servings vegetable/fruit per day, ≤1 serving red meat/cold cuts per week, <7% saturated fat).

Treatment evaluations are conducted every three months at each clinic visit and include all three components of the treatment (diet, exercise, vitamin D). Seven-day food records is collected from each patient which is filled a week before the clinic visit. The information in the food record is reviewed by the nutritionist staff with the patient and subsequently inserted in a diet analysis program (WinFood Medimatica, Version 3.9.0). Daily means of GI, energy intake, macro- and micro-nutrients and food groups will be obtained from WinFood and periodically evaluated to ensure adherence to the dietary advice. The physical activity component is measured with a step counter with 7-day memory (OMRON Walking Style IV) and with a questionnaire. Participants bring the step counter back at each clinic visit and the 7-day values are recorded by the research staff. Vitamin D is evaluated by blood analysis of 25(OH)D every three months, the dose reviewed at each clinic visit and changed if necessary to reach the group target (Table 4). QoL is measured with questionnaires specifically made for cancer patients (EQ-5D-3 L, EORTC QLQ-C30 e EORTC QLQ-BC23) [47–49].
Table 4

Vitamin D algorithm

Blood levels (ng/ml)

Oral dose (IU)

Treatment duration

Group A (target: 60 ng/ml):

  < 10

75 000 at study visit

+4000/day

3 months

then re-evaluate

  > 10-20

50 000 at study visit

+4000/day

3 months

then re-evaluate

  > 20-30

25 000 at study visit

+4000/day

3 months

then re-evaluate

  > 30

4000/day

3 months

then re-evaluate

 60-80

change to 1000 IU/day

3 months

then re-evaluate

Group B (target: 30 ng/ml):

  ≤ 10

100 000 at study visit

Re-evaluate after 3 months

  ≤ 20

75 000 at study visit

Re-evaluate after 3 months

  > 20-25

50 000 at study visit

Re-evaluate after 3 months

  > 25-29

25 000 at study visit

Re-evaluate after 3 months

  ≥ 30

0

Re-evaluate after 3 months

Outcome measures

Figure 1 depicts the timing and frequency of all study measures. Blood analyses, blood pressure, anthropometric measurements and 7-day food records are taken at baseline and every 3 months afterwards until end of study (up to 33 months). Complete blood analyses are done at baseline, 1 year and end of study while blood analysis pertinent to the treatment are done every three months (Table 5). The primary outcome is the percentage of patients alive at end of study without BC recurrence (disease in the same or opposite breast or any metastasis). The primary outcome is assessed at each collaborating centre by the collaborating oncologist and confirmed by hospital pathological results which are communicated to the coordinating centre. Secondary end points include glycemic control including blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), cardiometabolic variables including body weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, C-reactive protein (CRP) and blood lipids, hormonal measures including insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), estradiol, testosterone and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and epigenetic markers (microRNA). Program adherence and any difficulty noticed, medications and medication changes, as well as any unusual or adverse events, including illness or stressful issues, that occurred since the last clinic visit are recorded in detail.
Table 5

Blood analyses performed during the study

Parameters

Baseline, 12 mo and study end

Every 3 months

25(OH)D

x

x

Calcium

x

x

Glucose

x

x

HbA1c

x

x

Insulin

x

 

Triglycerides

x

 

Total Cholesterol

x

 

 LDL-C

x

 

 HDL-C

x

 

AST/ALT

x

 

CRP

x

 

Estradiol

x

 

Testosterone

x

 

SHBG

x

 

IGF-1

x

 

microRNA

x

 

For future analyses

x

x

AST/ALT: aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase, CRP: C-reactive protein, HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c, HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol, IGF-1: insulin-like growth factor-1, LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol, SHBG: sex hormone binding globulin, 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Blood samples and all information regarding the patient are sent to the coordinating centre where blood samples are centrally analyzed and information entered electronically and statistically analyzed for the interim and end of study reports.

Biochemical analyses

Serum vitamin D and IGF-1 are analyzed using DiaSorin kits on Liaison XL analyzer (DiaSorin) by chemiluminescent method (CLIA). The HbA1c value is analyzed using whole blood collected in EDTA Vacutainer tubes (Vacutainer; Becton, Dickinson and Co) by a turbidimetric inhibition latex immunoassay (TINA QUANT Roche Diagnostics) on Cobas C6000 analyzer (Roche). Serum glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), are measured using reagents and analyzer (Cobas C6000) by Roche Diagnostics according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum insulin, estradiol, testosterone and SHBG are performed on the same analyzer by electro-chemiluminescent method (ECLIA). Nephelometric quantification of CRP is performed on BNP ProSpec nephelometer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum samples are obtained by blood collected in Vacutainer tubes without anticoagulant (Becton, Dickinson and Co) and analyzed within 24 hours. All analytes are measured in the coordinating hospital routine analytical laboratory undergoing quality control procedures.

MicroRNA Analysis

Previous studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) are frequently dysregulated in human cancers, including BC [50, 51] and may be modified by the glycemic load of the diet [41]. Computational models are important for the understanding of biological systems [52]. The following are the procedures to identify and analyze miRNA. These analyses will be conducted at the Laboratory of the Biomedical Sciences Department at the University of Catania (Italy).

Identification of plasma miRNA in BC

Plasma samples are randomly selected for the analysis by the Human Serum & Plasma miScript miRNA PCR Array (Qiagen) that profiles the expression of 84 miRNAs. In this phase, miRNA expression patterns are analyzed in BC patients according to the lifestyle and dietary intake.

Circulating microRNA analysis

miRNAs can be easily purified from a number of patient body fluids. Several studies shown that miRNAs were present in serum and plasma and easily detectable by a sample of peripheral blood. Circulating miRNAs may be important players in the formation of the tumor microenvironment and metastatic evolution by promoting epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) of tumor cells. RNA and miRNAs fraction are extracted from 200 μL of plasma are isolated by miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations Extracted miRNAs are reverse transcribed into cDNA and analyzed by miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen).

Validation of circulating miRNAs in BC tissues

Data obtained in the previous two steps above are validated in tumor tissue samples to confirm the origin source of the circulating miRNA previously identified.

miRNAs and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT)

miRNAs, a class of small non-coding RNA molecules that post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression, are attractive candidates for regulating stem cell self-renewal, cell fate decisions and cell plasticity. For this reason, miRNAs analysis is carried out to shed light on the post-transcriptional control of EMT and stemness.

Analysis of EMT genes

Publicly available gene expression datasets are analyzed to identify pathways involved in EMT. For this reason a comparative analysis of expression of master regulators of EMT genes (Beta-Catenin, OPN, Twist1/2, Snail1/2, Zeb1/2, N-cad, Vim, E-cad and NGAL) will be performed. GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis http://broad.mit.edu/gsea) will assess whether the potential pathways involved in EMT, identified in the previous analysis, will be confirmed using a different computational approach. The key genes, representing the highly connected hubs in the identified networks, are assessed by qRT-PCR and IHC on selected archival tumor series to determine their diagnostic and prognostic value according to clinical information, lifestyle and dietary intake.

MiRNAs and their role in modulating EMT

Validated miRNAs are analyzed by in silico approaches (miRanda, miRbase, TargetScan) to evaluate if EMT genes previously analyzed are included among their putative target genes. miRNAs here identified and their putative target genes are analyzed in BC tumor tissue, positive for canonical mesenchymal markers, such as Vimentin and N-cadherin. Evaluation of EMT markers are carried out by IHC followed by laser micro-dissection. Further functional experiments are performed to validate in silico considerations.

Risk recurrence in BC by computational modeling

The development of a computational model based on agent based modelling, differential equations or Petri nets could lead to a validated tool able to predict the efficacy of the dietary regimen. The model is fit with data coming from the diet regiment components, diet effects, life style, and from plasma miRNAs analysis. miRNAs expression allows the model to be tuned to find evidences that may be relevant to predict the time and the probability of recurrence risk.

Sample size

Considering a 20% recurrence rate within 3 years in most collaborating centres for BC cases specified in Table 2, and a predicted rate of 10% in the high intensity arm, with power of 80% and two-sided alpha of 0.05, the number of subjects are 506 (n = 253 in each arm).

Statistical analyses

All randomized patients will be analysed considering the “intention-to-treat” principle (ITT analysis). Results will be expressed as percentages or means ± SEM or 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Primary analyses

The primary analyses will assess the between-treatment difference in BC recurrence measured as disease-free survival (DFS), calculated as the percentage of patients alive without recurrence of disease at study end (up to 33 months from randomization). BC recurrence is defined as the relapse of the disease or metastasis either in the same breast (including new positive lymph nodes), or the opposite breast or in distant organs. The duration of DFS in patients lost at follow-up will be censured at the date of the last day the patient was considered free of disease. Between-treatment differences in DFS will be analyzed by log-rank test. Kaplan-Meier curves will be provided to estimate median DFS and 95% CI. To address the impact of potential imbalance in prognostic factors we will repeat the primary analysis using the log-rank test stratified by stage, age, family history of BC, time since diagnosis, molecular subtype, medication use, smoking, baseline waist circumference and dietary variables (baseline GI, dietary fiber, saturated fat, vegetables/fruit, meat, sweets/desserts). Missing data for covariates will be handled by using the missing indicator method.

Sensitivity analyses

To assess the robustness of our ITT primary analysis with possible missing data we will repeat the primary analysis using completers data only as well as per-protocol data only, using multiple imputation method to generate missing data in the stratification step. To assess the impact of participant-level factors on the primary outcome we will examine DFS separately in those who, at study end, have reached normo-glycemia (<110 mg/dl) and normal levels of HbA1c <6.0% versus those who have higher levels, in those who reached circulating 25(OH)D ≥60 ng/ml versus those who reached ≤30 ng/ml, in those who have lower versus those who have higher insulin levels (median will be used as cut-offs), in those who have good overall compliance on the three treatment components that is in the highest quantile of: low GI + number of daily steps + levels of 25(OH)D, versus those who have lower compliance. For these analyses study end is defined as the mean of the last three visits.

Secondary analyses

The mean and standard error for each of the following variables will be determined for each study group. The change from baseline to end of study will be compared between groups using repeated measures ANOVA and using nonparametric tests if necessary, for the following variables: body weight, waist circumference, BMI, blood pressure, serum levels of 25(OH)D, blood glucose, HbA1c, insulin, IGF-1, lipids, CRP, estradiol, testosterone, SHBG, specific microRNAs, dietary glycemic index, number of steps per day and quality of life. We will also test treatment differences in medication use and medication side effects. Chi-square test will be used to compare categorical variables and Student t-test or Wilcoxon test for continuous variables. The association between each variable and prognosis will be analyzed using Cox proportional hazard model and logistic regression. Finally, we will assess whether these secondary analyses are different at year 1 compared to end of study. All statistical analyses will be conducted with SPSS statistical software version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA).

Potential toxicity and adverse events

Toxicity due to diet, moderate exercise or vitamin D supplementation are not expected. The diet is an enhanced Mediterranean diet with one arm consuming more low GI foods and physical activity involves moderate exercise of 30 min of daily brisk walk and both respond to lifestyle principles suggested by cancer guidelines such as the American Cancer Society [8] and the World Cancer Research Fund [9]. Oral vitamin D (cholecalciferol) supplementation will be given at safe dosages (up to 4000 IU/day) to reach safe blood levels (60 ng/ml for the test arm and 30 ng/ml for the control arm) [53, 54]. In Italy the normal range of 25(OH)D is between 30-100 ng/ml. Excess vitamin D levels (>100 ng/ml) could induce excess calcium absorption from the intestine and potentially result in hypercalcemia (>11 mg/dl). Both serum 25(OH)D and calcium levels are monitored throughout the study at each clinic visit and any signs or symptom of hypervitaminosis D (hypercalcemia, excess thirst, etc.) will be recorded and immediately communicated to the participant’s physician and supplementation stopped. All adverse events occurring after signing the consent form will be recorded in a specific Adverse Event Form.

Ethical considerations

The study will determine which group will benefit the most however both treatments are expected to gain some health benefits since both treatments are based on a healthy diet and lifestyle and sufficient vitamin D levels. An interim analysis will be conducted to evaluate whether there are excessive disadvantages for one group over the other. Should this happen the study would be terminated and both groups allowed to follow the most beneficial treatment program. Participants health complications will be dealt by the research team of doctors and by contacting patients’ physicians. Should any complication put the participant at risk by continuing the study the participant will be invited to withdraw from the study. The study participants will also have the right to withdraw from the study anytime and for any personal reason without jeopardizing their health care in the study institution or any other institution.

Discussion

The purpose of this study is to reduce BC recurrence and hence increase disease-free survival through a lifestyle program that includes a low glycemic index diet, physical activity and vitamin D supplementation in women with BC living in a Mediterranean country. It is expected that the higher intensity program of low GI diet, exercise and vitamin D will reduce BC recurrence by 50% compared to the lower intensity program.

Dietary clinical trials to reduce BC recurrence have been conducted previously. In the USA two large studies were conducted, the Women’s Intervention Nutrition trial (WIN) and the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living trial (WHEL). The WIN study which focused on a low-fat diet found a 24% reduction in BC recurrence after 5 years compared to a control of minimal dietary counselling [10], whereas the WHEL study focusing on a combination of low-fat and high-fruit and -vegetable diet did not reduce BC recurrence after a 7-year intervention compared to a lower intensity fruit and vegetables advice [11]. This null result may be partly explained by methodology aspects as most women had early stage BC and one of the inclusion criteria was the diagnosis of BC within 4 years. It is possible that such a diet may be protective if consumed earlier, possibly within 1 year of diagnosis as in the WIN study [10]. However, in the WHEL study, women who at baseline consumed more than 3 servings of vegetables per day showed a 30% reduction in BC recurrence and an even greater reduction (up to 52%) in tamoxifen users [55]. Furthermore, women who at baseline consumed at least 5 portions of vegetables/fruit per day and additionally walked for at least 30 min a day had a 44% higher chance of survival, independently of obesity, suggesting that obesity did not impact on lowering survival if people adhered to a healthy lifestyle pattern [56]. Overall these large clinical trials suggest the importance of intervening early after diagnosis and that plant-based diets and half hour daily walk may be protective from future recurrence. The low fat advice may however be appropriate only in countries with high intakes of saturated fat. In Mediterranean countries where diets are characterized by high intakes of olive oil, reducing fat intakes may not be beneficial. In the PREDIMED intervention trial, women without BC but following the intensive Mediterranean dietary advice with high olive oil intakes showed up to 68% lower risk of BC compared with those on lower olive oil intake [57]. The traditional Mediterranean diet, rich in plant food and olive oil, has been associated with protection from BC risk [58, 59] CVD events [60], type two diabetes risk [61] and complications [62, 63] and favour weight loss [64]. However, adherence to a traditional Mediterranean diet has halved from the 60’s to 2003 in Mediterranean countries including Italy [65], hence there may be health benefits in improving the current Mediterranean style dietary pattern. The Italian diet is very rich in carbohydrates, particularly bread and other fast absorbing carbohydrates (high GI foods) which have been associated with higher risk of BC as well as other chronic conditions [15, 16, 18, 66]. Since factors influencing the metabolism of glucose may play a relevant role in the development of chronic diseases including BC [15], it is possible that lowering the GI of the Mediterranean diet of Italian women with BC through guided dietary advice, a lower recurrence may be achieved. Chronic elevation of insulin concentrations may be one of the mechanisms explaining the positive association between dietary GI and cancer risk [67]. High GI diets increase blood glucose and insulin levels more than low GI diets and hence may be involved in increasing IGF-1 bioavailability [31]. Insulin is an anabolic hormone able to increase IGF-1 synthesis and activity and IGF-1 in turn may promote cancer development by inhibiting apoptosis, stimulating cell proliferation and sex-steroid synthesis [68, 69]. Another mechanism for high GI-related increased cancer risk may be through hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress [70, 71] which has been implicated in free radical-dependent DNA damage, known as a contributor to carcinogenesis [72, 73]. Within normal ranges of glycemia higher levels of normal have been directly associated with BC risk in previously healthy women [74] and with higher recurrence rates in women with BC [75]. Another potential mechanism may be through lowering the availability of circulating glucose following low GI diets and exercise. Cancer cells are avid consumers of glucose due to their altered metabolism characterized by insufficient oxidative phosphorylation and compensatory glucose fermentation (the Warburg effect) [76]. This results in lactic acid production and higher protons which acidify the external cellular microenvironment reaching a pH of 6.5-6.9 [77]. A lower pH may provide a competing survival and metastatic advantage for cancer cells (e.g. greater spreading capacity) over normal cells unable to survive below a pH of 7.2 [77, 78] and may induce drug resistance of weak base-anticancer drugs (e.g. doxorubicin) [78].

Physical activity after BC diagnosis has also been shown to reduce the risk of BC mortality by 40-50% particularly when it is of moderate intensity such as 30 minutes of brisk walking per day [32–35]. This effect may be modulated partly by reduced insulin, insulin-like growth factors and estrogen levels [36, 79, 80] which are associated with BC recurrence and death [81, 82]. Furthermore, physical activity can improve insulin sensitivity, reduce blood triglycerides, blood pressure and body fat [83–85]. The lifestyle changes proposed in this study (lower dietary GI, enhanced Mediterranean diet, physical activity) may also induce weight loss which in turn may improve insulin sensitivity, IGF profile and reduce aromatase activity in adipose tissue with consequent reduction in estrogen levels [86], particularly relevant in postmenopausal women [87]. Although weight loss is not a goal of the DEDiCa study, participants will be allowed to lose weight in situations of overwheight or obesity should they wish to. The secondary statistical analyses will take into consideration this aspect.

Lifestyle changes may be more efficacious in a setting of vitamin D sufficiency. Vitamin D alters genes implicated in cellular growth, through upregulation of E-cadherin thereby stimulating cell differentiation and apoptosis [39]. Higher serum vitamin D levels (>30 ng/ml) in BC patients have been associated with 50% less fatality rates compared to lower levels (<20 ng/ml) [88]. The vitamin D dose–response relationship for BC appears inverse and linear up to 60 ng/ml [39]. These levels could achieve a 25% lower BC incidence and could be reached by supplementing 2000–4000 IU/day [53, 89]. The upper dose recommended by the National Academy of Sciences is 4000 IU/day [54]. The Italian guidelines for the prevention and treatment of hypovitaminosis D (SIOMMMS) indicate that in Italy this condition is present in 50% of young adults and at higher rates in older individuals [53]. The updated SIOMMMS guidelines for vitamin D deficiency (25-OH-D < 10 ng/ml) suggest up to 600,000 as a cumulative dose [90]. In Italy the normal range for circulating 25-OH-D is set between 30 ng/ml and 100 ng/ml while toxicity levels are considered above 150 ng/ml [53]. Vitamin D can also protect against bone loss and risk of fractures as a consequence of osteoporosis typically seen after postmenopause or after estrogen deprivation therapy used in BC treatment. Hence vitamin D supplementation may also reduce adverse skeletal effects [53]. Furthermore, higher vitamin D levels have also been associated with reduced risk of developing diabetes [91, 92]. Continuous improvements in survival rates will have an impact on comorbidities and quality of life of BC survivors. Co-morbid conditions have been found at higher prevalence in cancer survivors than in age-matched controls [93] and in the subgroup of cancer patients presenting with two comorbidities, the most frequent combination of diseases appeared to be CVD in men and diabetes in women [94]. There are downstream effects of cancer therapy (e.g. radiation and chemotherapy) causing heart, respiratory, kidney and memory problems but also of hormone suppressing therapy in BC patients [95]. Compounding on this problem, cancer survivors fail to receive the same level of care for their comorbid condition compared to the general population [96] and this is especially true for type two diabetes [97]. Hence it may become even more relevant to implement cost-effective lifestyle risk reduction strategies. Two international cancer organizations have published lifestyle guidelines for cancer survivors, The American Cancer Society (ACS) [8] and the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) [9], however there is no agreement on a specific lifestyle program that could reduce BC recurrence and complications including recommendations on vitamin D supplementation.

DEDiCa study includes treatment components such as low GI, traditional Mediterranean foods, high dietary fiber and physical activity which have been shown to reduce risk factors for type two diabetes and CVD including HbA1c, blood glucose and lipids, and inflammatory factors [15, 20, 22, 23, 25–28, 30, 60, 98–100].

This study will contribute to understanding the efficacy of lifestyle changes in a Mediterranean population of BC survivors with respect to several novel aspects: testing a lifestyle modification (diet and exercise) within normal vitamin D levels on disease-free survival; investigate lifestyle changes in relation to BC staging, molecular subtypes, menopausal status, body weight, CVD risk factors and events, diabetes control, new diabetes cases, quality of life, response to medication. It will also allow to understand breast carcinogenesis and the role of microRNA in BC and whether they are modulated by dietary and other lifestyle aspects. It will allow to investigate best time of treatment adherence since women will be enrolled within 12 months of surgery, some will have just started their cancer therapy and some will have ended.

Given the supporting evidence of important health effects and safety of the components of DEDiCa intervention we believe it is feasible and urgent to test this program in BC patients.

Abbreviations

25(OH)D: 

25-hydroxyvitamin D

AST/ALT: 

Aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase

BC: 

Breast cancer

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

GI: 

Glycemic index

HbA1c: 

Hemoglobin A1c

HDL-C: 

High density lipoprotein cholesterol

HIT: 

High intensity treatment

IGF-1: 

Insulin-like growth factor-1

LDL-C: 

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol

LITE: 

Low intensity treatment

RNA: 

Ribonucleic acid

SHBG: 

Sex hormone binding globulin

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Barilla Spa for providing pasta, Abiogen Pharma for providing vitamin D, and Lega Italiana per la Lotta Contro i Tumori (LILT Nazionale) Progetto Cinque Per Mille 2013 and LILT Catania for their support.

Funding

This trial is funded by a grant of the Italian Ministry of Health (grant no. PE-2013-02358099). The funding body will not play any role in the study.

Availability of data and material

None declared.

Authors’ contributions

LSA, ML, AC, MG and MM contributed to the protocol and grant proposal. LSA, CWCK, DJAJ and GR contributed to the dietary aspect of the intervention program design, MP and LSA contributed to the exercise aspect of the intervention program design, DG and LSA contributed to the vitamin D aspect of the intervention program design. MDL, MR, MDA, FC, GB, FF, RR, DS, SM, GT, GC contributed to patient selection criteria. EC, LSA, MM and ML contributed to the biochemical analysis plan. AC, EV and EB were primarily involved in developing the statistical analysis plan. LSA wrote the manuscript. The manuscript was amended based on comments from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

LSA has received honoraria from the Nutrition Foundation of Italy (NFI, Milan) and from Lega Italiana per la Lotta Contro i Tumori (LILT-Catania). DG has received speaking and/or consulting fees from Abiogen Pharma, Amgen, Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Merck and Mundipharma. MP has received research support from Amgen. GR has received research grants from Barilla Spa to his University Department and speaker and travel fees from Sanofi, Astra Zeneca and Takeda. CWCK has received research support from the Advanced Foods and Material Network, Agrifoods and Agriculture Canada, the Almond Board of California, the American Pistachio Growers, Barilla, the California Strawberry Commission, the Calorie Control Council, CIHR, the Canola Council of Canada, the Coca-Cola Company (investigator initiated, unrestricted grant), Hain Celestial, the International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research and Education Foundation, Kellogg, Kraft, Loblaw Companies Ltd., Orafti, Pulse Canada, Saskatchewan Pulse Growers, Solae and Unilever. He has received travel funding, consultant fees and/or honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, the Almond Board of California, the American Peanut Council, the American Pistachio Growers, Barilla, Bayer, the Canola Council of Canada, the Coca-Cola Company, Danone, General Mills, the International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research and Education Foundation, Kellogg, Loblaw Companies Ltd., the Nutrition Foundation of Italy, Oldways Preservation Trust, Orafti, Paramount Farms, the Peanut Institute, PepsiCo, Pulse Canada, Sabra Dipping Co., Saskatchewan Pulse Growers, Solae, Sun-Maid, Tate and Lyle, and Unilever. He has served on the scientific advisory board for the Almond Board of California, the International Tree Nut Council, Oldways Preservation Trust, Paramount Farms and Pulse Canada. He is a member of the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC), Executive Board Member of the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), is on the Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee for Nutrition Therapy of the EASD and is a Director of the Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials foundation. DJAJ has received research grants from Saskatchewan Pulse Growers, the Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program through the Pulse Research Network, the Advanced Foods and Material Network, Loblaw Companies Ltd., Unilever, Barilla, the Almond Board of California, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Pulse Canada, Kellogg’s Company, Canada, Quaker Oats, Canada, Procter & Gamble Technical Centre Ltd., Bayer Consumer Care, Springfield, NJ, Pepsi/Quaker, International Nut & Dried Fruit (INC), Soy Foods Association of North America, the Coca-Cola Company (investigator initiated, unrestricted grant), Solae, Haine Celestial, the Sanitarium Company, Orafti, the International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research and Education Foundation, the Peanut Institute, the Canola and Flax Councils of Canada, the Calorie Control Council (CCC), the CIHR, the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Ontario Research Fund. He has been on the speaker’s panel, served on the scientific advisory board and/or received travel support and/or honoraria from the Almond Board of California, Canadian Agriculture Policy Institute, Loblaw Companies Ltd, the Griffin Hospital (for the development of the NuVal scoring system, the Coca-Cola Company, EPICURE, Danone, Saskatchewan Pulse Growers, Sanitarium Company, Orafti, the Almond Board of California, the American Peanut Council, the International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research and Education Foundation, the Peanut Institute, Herbalife International, Pacific Health Laboratories, Nutritional Fundamental for Health, Barilla, Metagenics, Bayer Consumer Care, Unilever Canada and Netherlands, Solae, Kellogg, Quaker Oats, Procter & Gamble, the Coca-Cola Company, the Griffin Hospital, Abbott Laboratories, the Canola Council of Canada, Dean Foods, the California Strawberry Commission, Haine Celestial, PepsiCo, the Alpro Foundation, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, DuPont Nutrition and Health, Spherix Consulting and WhiteWave Foods, the Advanced Foods and Material Network, the Canola and Flax Councils of Canada, the Nutritional Fundamentals for Health, Agri-Culture and Agri-Food Canada, the Canadian Agri-Food Policy Institute, Pulse Canada, the Saskatchewan Pulse Growers, the Soy Foods Association of North America, the Nutrition Foundation of Italy (NFI), Nutra-Source Diagnostics, the McDougall Program, the Toronto Knowledge Translation Group (St. Michael’s Hospital), the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, the Canadian Nutrition Society (CNS), the American Society of Nutrition (ASN), Arizona State University, Paolo Sorbini Foundation and the Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes. He received an honorarium from the US Department of Agriculture to present the 2013 W.O. Atwater Memorial Lecture. He received the 2013 Award for Excellence in Research from the International Nut and Dried Fruit Council. He received funding and travel support from the Canadian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism to produce mini cases for the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA). He is a member of the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC). His wife is a director and partner of Glycemic Index Laboratories, Inc., and his sister received funding through a grant from the St. Michael’s Hospital Foundation to develop a cookbook for one of his studies. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethic board of: the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA), the National Cancer Institute “Fondazione Giovanni Pascale” in Naples, Azienda Ospedaliera per L’Emergenza Ospedale Cannizzaro in Catania, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico “G. Martino” in Messina for San Vincenzo Hospital of Taormina, Comitato Etico Campania Centro ASL NA1 Centro for Clinica Mediterranea in Naples. Written informed consent will be obtained from each recruited patient before the intervention and questionnaire survey.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Cancer Institute Istituto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione Giovanni Pascale”, IRCCS, Naples, Italy
(2)
Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
(3)
Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences Oncologic, Clinical and General Pathology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
(4)
Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
(5)
San Vincenzo Hospital, Taormina, Italy
(6)
National Cancer Institute CRO, Aviano, Italy
(7)
Seconda Universita’ di Napoli, Naples, Italy
(8)
Clinica Mediterranea SpA, Naples, Italy
(9)
Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
(10)
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
(11)
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(12)
College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
(13)
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
(14)
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
(15)
National Cancer Institute IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori “Regina Elena”, Rome, Italy

References

  1. De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, Trama A, Visser O, Brenner H, Ardanaz E, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE--5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):23–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ma FJ, Liu ZB, Qu L, Hao S, Liu GY, Wu J, Shao ZM. Impact of type two diabetes mellitus on the prognosis of early stage triple-negative breast cancer in People’s Republic of China. OncoTargets Ther. 2014;7:2147–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaplan MA, Pekkolay Z, Kucukoner M, Inal A, Urakci Z, Ertugrul H, Akdogan R, Firat U, Yildiz I, Isikdogan A. Type two diabetes mellitus and prognosis in early stage breast cancer women. Med Oncol. 2012;29(3):1576–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Salinas-Martinez AM, Flores-Cortes LI, Cardona-Chavarria JM, Hernandez-Gutierrez B, Abundis A, Vazquez-Lara J, Gonzalez-Guajardo EE. Prediabetes, diabetes, and risk of breast cancer: a case–control study. Arch Med Res. 2014;45(5):432–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Armenian SH, Xu L, Ky B, Sun C, Farol LT, Pal SK, Douglas PS, Bhatia S, Chao C. Cardiovascular disease among survivors of adult-onset cancer: a community-based retrospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1122–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gavila J, Seguí MÁ, Calvo L, López T, Alonso JJ, Farto M, Sánchez-de la Rosa R. Evaluation and management of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer: a Delphi study. Clin Transl Oncol. 2017;19(1):91–104. doi:10.1007/s12094-016-1508-y.
  7. Giovannucci E, Harlan DM, Archer MC, Bergenstal RM, Gapstur SM, Habel LA, Pollak M, Regensteiner JG, Yee D. Diabetes and cancer: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1674–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, Bandera EV, Hamilton KK, Grant B, McCullough M, et al. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):243–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. WCRF. 2015. http://www.wcrf.org/int/cancer-facts-figures/worldwide-data Accessed 22 January 2016.
  10. Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Thomson CA, Nixon DW, Shapiro A, Hoy MK, Goodman MT, Giuliano AE, Karanja N, McAndrew P, et al. Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: interim efficacy results from the Women’s intervention nutrition study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(24):1767–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pierce JP, Natarajan L, Caan BJ, Parker BA, Greenberg ER, Flatt SW, Rock CL, Kealey S, Al-Delaimy WK, Bardwell WA, et al. Influence of a diet very high in vegetables, fruit, and fiber and low in fat on prognosis following treatment for breast cancer: the Women’s healthy eating and living (WHEL) randomized trial. JAMA. 2007;298(3):289–98.Google Scholar
  12. Kushi LH, Kwan ML, Lee MM, Ambrosone CB. Lifestyle factors and survival in women with breast cancer. J Nutr. 2007;137(1 Suppl):236S–42S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, Henry KS, Mackey HT, Cowens-Alvarado RL, Cannady RS, Pratt-Chapman ML, Edge SB, Jacobs LA, et al. American cancer society/american society of clinical oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):611–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, Bowling AC, Newman HC, Jenkins AL, Goff DV. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34(3):362–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Barclay AW, Petocz P, McMillan-Price J, Flood VM, Prvan T, Mitchell P, Brand-Miller JC. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk--a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(3):627–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Turati F, Galeone C, Gandini S, Augustin LS, Jenkins DJ, Pelucchi C, La Vecchia C. High glycemic index and glycemic load are associated with moderately increased cancer risk. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59(7):1384–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Choi Y, Giovannucci E, Lee JE. Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of diabetes-related cancers: a meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(11):1934–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Augustin LS, Dal Maso L, La Vecchia C, Parpinel M, Negri E, Vaccarella S, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ, Francesch S. Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: a case–control study. Ann Oncol. 2001;12(11):1533–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyerhardt JA, Sato K, Niedzwiecki D, Ye C, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Mowat RB, Whittom R, Hantel A, Benson A, et al. Dietary glycemic load and cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB 89803. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(22):1702–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Livesey G, Taylor R, Livesey H, Liu S. Is there a dose–response relation of dietary glycemic load to risk of type two diabetes? meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(3):584–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bhupathiraju SN, Tobias DK, Malik VS, Pan A, Hruby A, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type two diabetes: results from three large US cohorts and an updated meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(1):218–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Fan J, Song Y, Wang Y, Hui R, Zhang W. Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and stroke mortality: a systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52182.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Mirrahimi A, de Souza RJ, Chiavaroli L, Sievenpiper JL, Beyene J, Hanley AJ, Augustin LS, Kendall CW, Jenkins DJ. Associations of glycemic index and load with coronary heart disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1(5):e000752.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, McKeown-Eyssen G, Josse RG, Silverberg J, Booth GL, Vidgen E, Josse AR, Nguyen TH, Corrigan S, et al. Effect of a low-glycemic index or a high-cereal fiber diet on type two diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;300(23):2742–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Brand-Miller J, Hayne S, Petocz P, Colagiuri S. Low-glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(8):2261–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Augustin LS, Mitchell S, Sahye-Pudaruth S, Blanco Mejia S, Chiavaroli L, Mirrahimi A, Ireland C, Bashyam B, et al. Effect of legumes as part of a low glycemic index diet on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in type two diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(21):1653–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Goff LM, Cowland DE, Hooper L, Frost GS. Low glycaemic index diets and blood lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;23(1):1–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolever TM, Gibbs AL, Mehling C, Chiasson JL, Connelly PW, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Maheux P, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Rodger NW, et al. The canadian trial of carbohydrates in diabetes (ccd), a 1-y controlled trial of low-glycemic-index dietary carbohydrate in type two diabetes: no effect on glycated hemoglobin but reduction in c-reactive protein. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(1):114–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Botero D, Ebbeling CB, Blumberg JB, Ribaya-Mercado JD, Creager MA, Swain JF, Feldman HA, Ludwig DS. Acute effects of dietary glycemic index on antioxidant capacity in a nutrient-controlled feeding study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(9):1664–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Larsen TM, Dalskov SM, van Baak M, Jebb SA, Papadaki A, Pfeiffer AF, Martinez JA, Handjieva-Darlenska T, Kunesova M, Pihlsgard M, et al. Diets with high or low protein content and glycemic index for weight-loss maintenance. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(22):2102–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Brand-Miller JC, Liu V, Petocz P, Baxter RC. The glycemic index of foods influences postprandial insulin-like growth factor-binding protein responses in lean young subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(2):350–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ibrahim EM, Al-Homaidh A. Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis: meta-analysis of published studies. Med Oncol. 2011;28(3):753–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Holick CN, Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A, Titus-Ernstoff L, Bersch AJ, Stampfer MJ, Baron JA, Egan KM, Willett WC. Physical activity and survival after diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Epidem Biomar Prev. 2008;17(2):379–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Siddiqi SM, McTiernan A, Alfano CM. Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(11):815–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, Kroenke CH, Colditz GA. Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA. 2005;293(20):2479–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ligibel JA, Campbell N, Partridge A, Chen WY, Salinardi T, Chen H, Adloff K, Keshaviah A, Winer EP. Impact of a mixed strength and endurance exercise intervention on insulin levels in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(6):907–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Feldman D, Krishnan AV, Swami S, Giovannucci E, Feldman BJ. The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(5):342–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Giovannucci E. Vitamin D and cancer incidence in the Harvard cohorts. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19(2):84–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Garland CF, Gorham ED, Mohr SB, Garland FC. Vitamin D for cancer prevention: global perspective. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19(7):468–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lappe JM, Travers-Gustafson D, Davies KM, Recker RR, Heaney RP. Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(6):1586–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McCann SE, Liu S, Wang D, Shen J, Hu Q, Hong CC, Newman VA, Zhao H. Reduction of dietary glycaemic load modifies the expression of microRNA potentially associated with energy balance and cancer pathways in pre-menopausal women. Br J Nutr. 2013;109(4):585–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ntanasis-Stathopoulos J, Tzanninis JG, Philippou A, Koutsilieris M. Epigenetic regulation on gene expression induced by physical exercise. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013;13(2):133–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Giangreco AA, Nonn L. The sum of many small changes: microRNAs are specifically and potentially globally altered by vitamin D3 metabolites. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;136:86–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Cordero F, Ferrero G, Polidoro S, Fiorito G, Campanella G, Sacerdote C, Mattiello A, Masala G, Agnoli C, Frasca G, et al. Differentially methylated micrornas in prediagnostic samples of subjects who developed breast cancer in the european prospective investigation into nutrition and cancer (epic-italy) cohort. Carcinogenesis. 2015;36(10):1144–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Gulyaeva LF, Kushlinskiy NE. Regulatory mechanisms of microRNA expression. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):143.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Al-Khanbashi M, Caramuta S, Alajmi AM, Al-Haddabi I, Al-Riyami M, Lui WO, Al-Moundhri MS. Tissue and serum mirna profile in locally advanced breast cancer (labc) in response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (nac) treatment. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0152032.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. EuroQol G. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Fayers PM. Interpreting quality of life data: population-based reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(11):1331–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sprangers MA, Groenvold M, Arraras JI, Franklin J, te Velde A, Muller M, Franzini L, Williams A, de Haes HC, Hopwood P, et al. The european organization for research and treatment of cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(10):2756–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Cuk K, Zucknick M, Madhavan D, Schott S, Golatta M, Heil J, Marme F, Turchinovich A, Sinn P, Sohn C, et al. Plasma microRNA panel for minimally invasive detection of breast cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76729.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Tutar Y. miRNA and cancer; computational and experimental approaches. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2014;15(5):429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Motta S, Pappalardo F. Mathematical modeling of biological systems. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14(4):411–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Adami S, Romagnoli E, Carnevale V, Scillitani A, Giusti A, Rossini M, Gatti D, Nuti R, Minisola S, Italian Society for Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, et al. Guidelines on prevention and treatment of vitamin d deficiency. Italian society for osteoporosis, Imineral metabolism and bone diseases (siommms). Reumatismo. 2011;63(3):129–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones G, et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(1):53–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomson CA, Rock CL, Thompson PA, Caan BJ, Cussler E, Flatt SW, Pierce JP. Vegetable intake is associated with reduced breast cancer recurrence in tamoxifen users: a secondary analysis from the women’s healthy eating and living study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;125(2):519–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Pierce JP, Stefanick ML, Flatt SW, Natarajan L, Sternfeld B, Madlensky L, Al-Delaimy WK, Thomson CA, Kealey S, Hajek R, et al. Greater survival after breast cancer in physically active women with high vegetable-fruit intake regardless of obesity. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(17):2345–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Toledo E, Salas-Salvado J, Donat-Vargas C, Buil-Cosiales P, Estruch R, Ros E, Corella D, Fito M, Hu FB, Aros F, et al. Mediterranean diet and invasive breast cancer risk among women at high cardiovascular risk in the predimed trial: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(11):1752–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Buckland G, Travier N, Cottet V, Gonzalez CA, Lujan-Barroso L, Agudo A, Trichopoulou A, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Peeters PH, et al. Adherence to the mediterranean diet and risk of breast cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(12):2918–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. la Vecchia C, Negri E, Franceschi S, Decarli A, Giacosa A, Lipworth L. Olive oil, other dietary fats, and the risk of breast cancer (Italy). Cancer Causes Contr. 1995;6(6):545–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvado J, Covas MI, Corella D, Aros F, Gomez-Gracia E, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Fiol M, Lapetra J, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(14):1279–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwingshackl L, Missbach B, Konig J, Hoffmann G. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(7):1292–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ajala O, English P, Pinkney J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of different dietary approaches to the management of type two diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(3):505–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Esposito K, Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Chiodini P, Panagiotakos D, Giugliano D. A journey into a Mediterranean diet and type two diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analyses. BMJ Open. 2015;5(8):e008222.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Lasa A, Miranda J, Bullo M, Casas R, Salas-Salvado J, Larretxi I, Estruch R, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Portillo MP. Comparative effect of two mediterranean diets versus a low-fat diet on glycaemic control in individuals with type two diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(7):767–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. da Silva R, Bach-Faig A, Raido Quintana B, Buckland G, Vaz de Almeida MD, Serra-Majem L. Worldwide variation of adherence to the Mediterranean diet, in 1961–1965 and 2000–2003. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(9A):1676–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Augustin LS, Malerba S, Lugo A, Franceschi S, Talamini R, Serraino D, Jenkins DJ, La Vecchia C. Associations of bread and pasta with the risk of cancer of the breast and colorectum. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(12):3094–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Augustin LS, Franceschi S, Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, La Vecchia C. Glycemic index in chronic disease: a review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56(11):1049–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Renehan AG, Zwahlen M, Minder C, O’Dwyer ST, Shalet SM, Egger M. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet. 2004;363(9418):1346–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kaaks R, Lukanova A. Energy balance and cancer: the role of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Proc Nutr Soc. 2001;60(1):91–106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Brownlee M. The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism. Diabetes. 2005;54(6):1615–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Ceriello A, Bortolotti N, Motz E, Pieri C, Marra M, Tonutti L, Lizzio S, Feletto F, Catone B, Taboga C. Meal-induced oxidative stress and low-density lipoprotein oxidation in diabetes: the possible role of hyperglycemia. Metabolism. 1999;48(12):1503–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Beckman KB, Ames BN. Oxidative decay of DNA. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(32):19633–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Halliwell B. Oxidative stress and cancer: have we moved forward? Biochem J. 2007;401(1):1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Sieri S, Muti P, Claudia A, Berrino F, Pala V, Grioni S, Abagnato CA, Blandino G, Contiero P, Schunemann HJ, et al. Prospective study on the role of glucose metabolism in breast cancer occurrence. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(4):921–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Minicozzi P, Berrino F, Sebastiani F, Falcini F, Vattiato R, Cioccoloni F, Calagreti G, Fusco M, Vitale MF, Tumino R, et al. High fasting blood glucose and obesity significantly and independently increase risk of breast cancer death in hormone receptor-positive disease. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(18):3881–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Warburg O. On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science. 1956;124(3215):269–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Gatenby RA. The potential role of transformation-induced metabolic changes in tumor-host interaction. Cancer Res. 1995;55(18):4151–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Fais S, Venturi G, Gatenby B. Microenvironmental acidosis in carcinogenesis and metastases: new strategies in prevention and therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014;33(4):1095–108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  79. McTiernan A, Tworoger SS, Ulrich CM, Yasui Y, Irwin ML, Rajan KB, Sorensen B, Rudolph RE, Bowen D, Stanczyk FZ, et al. Effect of exercise on serum estrogens in postmenopausal women: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Cancer Res. 2004;64(8):2923–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Woolcott CG, McTiernan A, Wang Q, Ballard-Barbash R, Jones CA, Stanczyk FZ, Brant RF, Yasui Y, et al. Changes in insulin resistance indicators, IGFs, and adipokines in a year-long trial of aerobic exercise in postmenopausal women. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011;18(3):357–69.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Trudeau ME, Koo J, Madarnas Y, Hartwick W, Hoffman B, Hood N. Fasting insulin and outcome in early-stage breast cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(1):42–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Baum M, Buzdar A, Howell A, Dowsett M, Forbes JF, Investigators AL. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(12):1135–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Byberg L, Zethelius B, McKeigue PM, Lithell HO. Changes in physical activity are associated with changes in metabolic cardiovascular risk factors. Diabetologia. 2001;44(12):2134–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Moreau KL, Degarmo R, Langley J, McMahon C, Howley ET, Bassett Jr DR, Thompson DL. Increasing daily walking lowers blood pressure in postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(11):1825–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Irwin ML, Mayer-Davis EJ, Addy CL, Pate RR, Durstine JL, Stolarczyk LM, Ainsworth BE. Moderate-intensity physical activity and fasting insulin levels in women: the cross-cultural activity participation study. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(4):449–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Campbell KL, Foster-Schubert KE, Makar KW, Kratz M, Hagman D, Schur EA, Habermann N, Horton M, Abbenhardt C, Kuan LY, et al. Gene expression changes in adipose tissue with diet- and/or exercise-induced weight loss. Cancer Prev Res. 2013;6(3):217–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Bulun SE, Zeitoun K, Sasano H, Simpson ER. Aromatase in aging women. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1999;17(4):349–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Mohr SB, Gorham ED, Kim J, Hofflich H, Garland CF. Meta-analysis of vitamin D sufficiency for improving survival of patients with breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(3):1163–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Garland CF, Gorham ED, Mohr SB, Grant WB, Giovannucci EL, Lipkin M, Newmark H, Holick MF, Garland FC. Vitamin D and prevention of breast cancer: pooled analysis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;103(3–5):708–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. SIOMMMS Guidelines. Linee guida 2015 per la diagnosi, prevenzione e terapia dell'osteoporosi. http://www.siommms.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Linee-guida-OP_2015.pdf.
  91. Forouhi NG, Ye Z, Rickard AP, Khaw KT, Luben R, Langenberg C, Wareham NJ. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and the risk of type two diabetes: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk cohort and updated meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetologia. 2012;55(8):2173–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. McDonnell SL, Baggerly LL, French CB, Heaney RP, Gorham ED, Holick MF, Scragg R, Garland CF. Incidence rate of type two diabetes is >50% lower in GrassrootsHealth cohort with median serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 41 ng/ml than in NHANES cohort with median of 22 ng/ml. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;155(Pt B):239–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Jabaaij L, van den Akker M, Schellevis FG. Excess of health care use in general practice and of comorbid chronic conditions in cancer patients compared to controls. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Louwman WJ, Aarts MJ, Houterman S, van Lenthe FJ, Coebergh JW, Janssen-Heijnen ML. A 50% higher prevalence of life-shortening chronic conditions among cancer patients with low socioeconomic status. Br J Cancer. 2010;103(11):1742–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Redig AJ, Munshi HG. Care of the cancer survivor: metabolic syndrome after hormone-modifying therapy. Am J Med. 2010;123(1):87. e81-86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Khan NF, Ward A, Watson E, Austoker J, Rose PW. Long-term survivors of adult cancers and uptake of primary health services: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(2):195–204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Liu W, Vyas A, Escalante C, Weiser MA, Wang J, Geraci JM. Results of general internal medicine consultations for diabetes mellitus in 283 cancer patients. Am J Med Sci. 2007;333(5):276–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Liu S, Manson JE, Buring JE, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Ridker PM. Relation between a diet with a high glycemic load and plasma concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75(3):492–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Liu S, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Holmes MD, Hu FB, Hankinson SE, Willett WC. Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(3):560–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, et al. Prevention of type two diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(18):1343–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us