Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Polish experience of lenalidomide in the treatment of lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated del(5q)

  • Aleksandra Butrym1, 2Email author,
  • Ewa Lech-Maranda3, 4,
  • Elżbieta Patkowska3,
  • Beata Kumiega5,
  • Maria Bieniaszewska6,
  • Andrzej Mital6,
  • Krzysztof Madry7,
  • Tigran Torosian7,
  • Ryszard Wichary8,
  • Justyna Rybka1,
  • Krzysztof Warzocha10 and
  • Grzegorz Mazur9
BMC Cancer201515:508

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1444-1

Received: 10 February 2015

Accepted: 18 May 2015

Published: 8 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Lenalidomide has been approved for the treatment of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with 5q deletion (del(5q)). We present for the first time a retrospective analysis of low-risk MDS with isolated del5q treated with lenalidomide, outside the clinical trials.

Methods

36 red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent patients have been included in the study. Patients received lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1–21 of 28-day cycles.

Results

91.7 % of patients responded to lenalidomide treatment: 72.2 % achieved erythroid response, 19.4 % achieved minor erythroid response and 8.4 % of patients did not respond to treatment. Response depended on number of previous treatment lines (p = 0.0101), International Prognostic System Score (IPSS; p = 0.0067) and RBC transfusion frequency (p = 0.0139). Median duration of response was 16 months (range 6–60 months). Treatment was well tolerated. We observed hematological toxicity (grade 3 and 4): neutropenia in 16 (44.4 %) patients and thrombocytopenia in 9 (25 %) patients. Two patients (5.5 %) progressed to high-risk MDS and two subsequent progressed to acute myeloid leukemia. A Kaplan-Meier estimate for overall survival at 5 years in the study group was 79.0 ± 8.8 %.

Conclusions

Lenalidomide in this group of patients was beneficial for the treatment of RBC transfusion-dependency with well-known safety profile.

Keywords

Myelodysplastic syndrome del(5q) Lenalidomide Transfusion independence

Background

In 2005, lenalidomide as an immunomodulating agent was approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in treatment of transfusion-dependent patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with 5q deletion (del(5q)). Currently, chromosome 5q deletion is one of the most frequent rearrangements observed in myelodysplastic syndrome, which may exist as an independent aberration or as a complex of cytogenetic disorders. Based on the latest classification of the World Health Organization (WHO), a new nosological entity, isolated deletion, was described. The above mentioned entity is characterized by the well-known clinical disease manifestation: presence of <5 % of myeloblasts in bone marrow and lack of Auer rods [1, 2]. Patients with isolated 5q deletion are mainly females with macrocytic anemia in the peripheral blood accompanied by normal platelet count or thrombocytosis. In the majority of patients with classic del(5q) syndrome, a transfusion dependency accompanied by iron overload developed over time [3]. In the paper by Patnaik et al., it was revealed that age, transfusion needs at diagnosis and dysgranulopoiesis were independent factors affecting survival reduction in patients with chromosome 5 long arm deletion syndrome [4]. In patients with del(5q) syndrome, lenalidomide introduction has given the chance for long-term responses to be achieved [59]. The drug modifies also immunological pathways involved in pathomechanism of the disease [10].

Currently, available data concerning lenalidomide efficacy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and del(5q) comes only from randomized studies. Moreover, the above mentioned data concerns a heterogeneous group of patients (del(5q) with additional aberrations); however, no publication on patients with isolated 5q deletion could be found [11]. In this paper, we present a retrospective analysis of homogeneous group of patients with isolated chromosome 5 long arms deletion treated with lenalidomide in Poland during the period 2006–2013 outside clinical trial settings.

Methods

This analysis included transfusion-dependent patients with low- and intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated del(5q) treated in 14 Polish hematological centers (2006–2013). Patients were receiving a 21-day oral treatment with lenalidomide 10 mg within a 28-day cycle. Patients were analyzed in respect of treatment response, treatment response duration and overall survival (measured in months since del5q syndrome diagnosis). Treatment response was assessed on the basis of International Working Group Criteria [12]. Treatment toxicity was determined in accordance with Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) scale v.4.0. The study has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Wroclaw medical University ethics committee. Informed consent was not obtained for publication of patient data as it is a retrospective analysis and does not compromise anonymity or confidentiality of patients.

Statistical analysis

Tests results were analyzed with the use of statistical methods. In all groups, means (X), medians (M), range (min-max), standard deviations (SD) as well as lower and upper quartiles (25-75Q) for investigated continuous parameters were calculated. Hypothesis concerning equivalence of means for particular samples was verified with the use a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test due to small number of cases in each group. In case of discrete parameters, the prevalence of a given trait in the group was analyzed with the use of χ2df test with Yates' correction and appropriate number of degrees of freedom df (df = (m-1)*(n-1), where m – number of lines, n – number of columns); or in case of 2 × 2 tables, when the expected cell value was < 5, the Fisher test was used. Survival curves were prepared with the use of Kaplan-Meier method. P value ≤ of 0.05 was statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of computer packages of statistical programs EPIINFO version 7.1.1.14 (from 02.07.2013).

Results

Patients’ characteristics

The final assessment was performed in 36 patients with isolated del(5q). The patient group was composed of 32 females (88.9 %) and 4 males between 25 and 83 years of age (median 66 years). In 14 patients, IPPS risk score was 0 and in 22 subjects the score was 0.5. According to IPSS-R classification, there were 25 patients with low risk and 11 patients with intermediate risk. WHO adapted Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) was also analyzed in two time points: at diagnosis there were 9 patients with WPSS 0 (very low risk) and 27 with WPSS 1 (low risk). At the moment of lenalidomide beginning all patients were in low risk category (WPSS 1).

At the commencement of treatment, all patients were transfusion-dependent. Enumeration of blast cell percentage has been done from a bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy. 18 subjects were treatment-naive; 6 patients received 1 previous treatment line; 8 subjects received 2 previous treatment lines and 4 patients received 3 treatment lines (erythropoietin, steroids, thalidomide) before lenalidomide therapy was started. Complete patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline patients’ characteristics

Characteristic

Total number of patients (N = 36)

Age, years

 Median

66

 Range

25–83

Sex, n (%)

 Female

32 (88.9)

 Male

4 (11.1)

Time since del5q diagnosis (months)

 Median

10

 Range

1–83

IPSS risk score, n (%)

 0

14 (38.9)

 0.5

22 (61.1)

Number of previous treatment lines

 0

18

 1

6

 2

8

 3

4

Transfusion dependency (months)

 Median

10

 Range

2–47

RBC transfusion units/8 weeks

 Median

2

 Range

1–10

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC), x 109/l

 Median

1.6

 Range

0.4–5.2

Baseline hemoglobin level, g/dl

 Median

7.4

 Range

5.2–8

Baseline platelet count, x 109/l

 Median

259

 Range

102–742

Myelogram

 High cellularity

30

 Low cellularity

6

Bone marrow dysplasia

 1 line

8

 2 lines

16

 3 lines

12

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, n (%)

 Normal

13 (36.1)

 Increased

23 (63.9)

Ferritin level

 Elevated

26

 Missing

10

Lenalidomide treatment

Patients received 1–20 cycles of lenalidomide therapy (median 5 cycles). 12 patients received ≤3 cycles of therapy and 24 subjects received >3 cycles of treatment. In 7 patients lenalidomide dose was reduced post 2nd and 3rd treatment cycle (in 1 patient due to infection and in 6 persons due to hematological toxicity). In those patients lenalidomide was administered in reduced dose of 5 mg on days 1–28 for two cycles. Then original dose of 10 mg was restarted. In 15 subjects treatment was stopped, despite good response, due to lack of further therapy reimbursement by the National Health Fund. In 9 patients, treatment was completed post erythroid response achievement. Only in 1 patient, lack of response was the cause for treatment withdrawal; in 2 patients, treatment was ended due to response loss (treatment until progression). In 3 patients, treatment was stopped due to toxicity. 6 patients still remain on lenalidomide therapy.

Treatment response

In 33 (91.7 %) patients, following treatment response was observed: 26 (72.2 %) patients achieved erythroid response; 7 patients obtained minor erythroid response. In 3 patients, no efficacy of lenalidomide therapy was seen. In case of cytogenetic response, a post-treatment follow-up cytogenetic test was performed only in 2 patients. Those patients achieved a complete cytogenetic response. Treatment response achievement (erythroid, cytogenetic) was negatively associated with number of previous treatment lines before lenalidomide administration; p = 0.0101 (the number of therapies before lenalidomide did not influence response duration but achievement of response), IPSS risk score (p = 0.0067), IPSS-R risk score (p = 0.01) and transfusion requirements (patients requiring less transfusions had better treatment response; p = 0.0139). Similarly, higher ferritin level was associated with worse treatment response (p = 0.0355). Lenalidomide dose reduction during treatment was associated with worse treatment response (p = 0.0334). The time from disease initial diagnosis did not affect treatment outcome. In total, in 33 patients transfusion independence was achieved. In 2 other subjects, an interval between two subsequent transfusions was extended. In 17 patients, transfusion independence was already observed after 1 treatment cycle; in 11 subjects after 2 cycles; in 3 after 3 cycles of lenalidomide therapy and in 2 other subjects post 4 treatment cycles. Transfusion independence achievement was associated with the number of previous treatment lines (p = 0.0308) but not linked to other clinical features as hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, blast count. Post-treatment median hemoglobin level increase was 4 g/dl (range 1–9.1 g/dl). Median duration of treatment response was 16 months (range 6–60 months). In two patients (5.5 %), a progression into high-risk MDS and in two other into acute myeloid leukemia were observed. Patients who progressed to high-risk MDS had no additional changes in cytogenetic. Patients, who progressed to AML had evolution of karyotype: trisomy of chromosome 8 in one patient and complex kariotype in second patient.

Toxicity

Treatment was well-tolerated. A hematological toxicity (grade 3 and 4) was observed: neutropenia - in 16 (44.4 %) patients and thrombocytopenia in 9 (25 %) subjects. Older age was a factor predisposing to grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurrence (p = 0.0156). Median age in group of patients without thrombocytopenia was 61 while in the group with thrombocytopenia during lenalidomide treatment was 71. In 4 patients, treatment was complicated by pneumonia (grade 2); in two patients, a diarrhea (grade 2) occurred. Other rare complications (grade 1 and grade 2) of therapy were as follows: liver enzymes increase (2 patients) and skin rash (1 patient).

Survival

In the study group, a Kaplan-Meier estimate for overall survival at 5 years was 79.0 ± 8.8 % Fig. 1. In multivariate analysis ferritin level was the only independent prognostic factor for longer OS in lenalidomide treated population (p = 0.01). In study population, five deaths were seen: one due to infection (during therapy), two deaths due to progression into AML (Acute myeloid leukemia), one due to progression into high-risk MDS and 2 due to unknown reasons. In those patients lenalidomide was stopped before death. Median leukemia free survival was 30 months (range 3–92). Patients' median follow-up was 58 months.
Fig. 1

Kapplan-Meier estimate for patients' overall survival proportion

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this paper presents the first analysis of cytogenetically homogeneous group of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and isolated 5q deletion. It should be highlighted that this study presents results of drug experience used in everyday clinical practice, outside clinical trial settings. In paper from 2005, it was demonstrated that lenalidomide had a hematological activity in patients with low-risk MDS without response to erythropoietin therapy whereas patients with del(5q) have higher response rate (83 %) in comparison to subjects with normal karyotype (57 %) and other chromosomal aberrations (12 %) [13]. In this paper, response rate was higher (91.7 %) due to homogeneous group of patients. In their later work, List et al. demonstrated the high efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with low- and intermediate-1 risk MDS and del(5q) syndrome. In 76 % of examined patients, transfusion need decrease was observed and in 67 % of subjects transfusion independence was achieved [9]. In comparison, our results show an even better response rate (91.7 %). Cytogenetic treatment response was achieved in 73 % of patients. Approximately 90 % of patients achieved transfusion independence within 3 months of therapy (range 1–49 weeks, median 4.6 weeks) [9]. In comparison, results of our analysis demonstrate that 93.9 % of patients achieved transfusion independence within first three treatment cycles. In the study mentioned above, a multivariate analysis showed that response to lenalidomide therapy was negatively affected by the presence of thrombocytopenia and increased transfusion requirements. Similarly, our results indicate that previous transfusion requirement negatively impacts the achievement of response to lenalidomide therapy.

In a phase III randomized trial, MDS-004, efficacy of two lenalidomide doses (5 and 10 mg) in transfusion-dependent patients with low- and intermediate-1 risk level was compared [8]. Transfusion independence for ≥26 weeks was demonstrated in: 56 % of patients treated with lenalidomide 10 mg, in 41 % of subjects receiving lenalidomide 5 mg and in 6 % of patients treated with placebo (p < 0.001 in 10 and 5 mg groups vs. placebo). In 10 mg lenalidomide group, 24 % of patients achieved complete cytogenetic response whereas in 5 mg group 11 % of subjects (placebo group-0 %). Adverse events in form of grade 3–4 neutropenia were observed in 74 and 75 % patients according to lenalidomide dose level (15 % in placebo group) whereas thrombocytopenia was seen in 33 and 41 % patients receiving 10 and 5 mg of lenalidomide, respectively (2 % in placebo group). In analysis of patients achieving transfusion-free period >26 weeks, a longer period free of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia in comparison to patients without treatment response was revealed (p = 0.021). Factors affecting survival free of progression into AML and overall survival before therapy were as follows: higher ferritin level, older age and high number of transfusions. Bone marrow myeloblast percentage, cytopenias, cytological abnormalities and IPSS risk score were not correlated with the disease progression risk. In the analysed population, the size of group with disease transformation (into AML or higher-risk MDS) is too small for reliable statistical analyses conduction. However, the obtained percentage results are not significantly different from literature data concerning population without lenalidomide treatment [14]. In the study by Le Bras et al., a 48-week lenalidomide therapy in 95 patients with low- and intermediate-1 risk MDS and del(5q) syndrome was described [15]. In the above mentioned study, 63 % of patients achieved transfusion independence. Median time to transfusion independence achievement was 16 weeks whereas mean overall survival after 16 months of therapy was 86 %. Within first 8 weeks of therapy, grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 62 % of patients whereas grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 25 % of subjects resulting in drug dose reduction in 55 % of cases. In our study, grade 3-4 neutropenia rate was 44 %, thus it was lower in comparison with cited publication. In contrast, thrombocytopenia rate is similar to that observed in Le Bras et al. study.

The study performed by Göhring et al. revealed that patients without cytogenetic remission and erythroid response post lenalidomide therapy had greater risk of progression into acute leukemia [16]. After three and five years of post-enrolment observation, the cumulative percentage of AML occurrence in patients with cytogenetic response was 10 and 21 %, respectively. In contrast, in patients without treatment response those rates were respectively 46 and 60 %. In 37 % of patients with MDS and isolated del5q and normal bone marrow blasts count, a progression into AML was observed whereas in 87 % of patients, a cytogenetic clonal evolution was seen. The weakness of our study group was the absence of cytogenetic analysis in patients with treatment response. The main reason for this seems to be the fact that physicians were satisfied by observing the treatment outcome and interrupted therapy when erythroid response was achieved. It is very important due to results of the last work by List et al., in which authors demonstrated that transfusion independence and cytogenetic response post lenalidomide therapy were associated with longer overall survival and lower progression into AML risk [17].

Conclusion

According to our knowledge, this is the first efficacy analysis of lenalidomide used outside clinical trial settings in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated 5q deletion. Currently available data indicates that lenalidomide 10 mg remains the first-line choice in treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and del(5q) aberration and results in higher transfusion independence and cytogenetic response rates achievement. It is worth noting that patients should be treated until disease progression. In our analysis, the main emerging problem was the limited drug availability resulting from socio-economic conditions, which in turn translated into too short treatment. Despite small numbers of therapeutic cycles, a very high rate of long-term responses (transfusion independence) was achieved. Treatment continuation at the moment of erythroid response achievement increases the chance for cytogenetic response occurrence and thus translated into patients' survival improvement. In the context, socio-economic conditions should play a secondary role and therapy should continue until patient still gets benefits from it.

Abbreviations

AML: 

Acute myeloid leukemia

CR: 

Complete remission

CTC: 

Common toxicity criteria

FDA: 

Food and drug administration

IPSS: 

International prognostic scoring system

IPSS-R: 

International prognostic scoring system

MDS: 

Myelodysplastic syndrome

RBC: 

Red blood cell

SD: 

Standard deviation

WHO: 

World health organisation

WPSS: 

WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was performed in collaboration with Polish Young Hematologist Association. The authors thank the following people for their contributions in data collection for this study: Wojciech Baran, Lena Drozdowska-Rams, Joanna Góra-Tybor, Anna Jachalska, Agnieszka Kopacz,,Magdalena Kubitzka, Edyta Subocz, Alina Świderska, Piotr Kostka, Jadwiga Dwilewicz-Trojaczek, Andrzej Helmann, Krzysztof Warzocha, Kazimierz Kuliczkowski.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Haematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw Medical University
(2)
Department of Physiology, Wroclaw Medical University
(3)
Department of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine
(4)
Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine
(5)
Department of Oncological Hematology, Carpathian Oncology Centre
(6)
Department of Hematology and Transplantology, Medical University of Gdansk
(7)
Department of Hematology, Warsaw Medical University
(8)
Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Silesian Medical University
(9)
Department of Internal Medicine, Occupational Diseases and Hypertension, Wroclaw Medical University
(10)
Department of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine

References

  1. Hasserjian R, Le Beau MM, List AF. Myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated del(5q). In: Swerdlow S, Campo E, Harris NL, editors. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC; 2008. p. 102–3.Google Scholar
  2. Butrym A, Dzietczenia J, Mazur G. Low risk myelodysplastic syndromes with del5q. Acta Haematol Pol. 2012;43:331–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Padron E, Komrokji R, List AF. Biology and treatment of the 5q-syndrome. Expert Rev Hematol. 2011;4:61–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Patnaik MM, Lasho TL, Finke CM, Gangat N, Caramazza D, Holtan SG, et al. WHO-defined myelodysplastic syndrome with isolated del(5q) in 88 consequtive patients: survival data, leukemic transformation rates and prevalence of JAK2, MPL and IDH mutations. Leukemia. 2010;24:1283–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Mukherjee S, Tiu RV, Sekeres MA. Blood consult: treating del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;119:342–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Himmelmann A, Tchinda J. Long-term transfusion independence in del(5q) MDS patients after short term therapy with lenalidomide: 2 new cases. Leuk Res. 2012;36:656–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Butrym A, Mędraś E, Potoczek S, Wróbel T, Dzietczenia J, Mazur G. Long-term remission after lenalidomide treatment in del(5q) syndrome - single center experience. Acta Haematol Pol. 2011;42:325–30.Google Scholar
  8. Fenaux P, Giagounidis A, Selleslag D, Beyne-Rauzy O, Mufti G, Mittelman M, et al. MDS-004 Lenalidomide del5q Study Group. A randomized phase 3 study of lenalidomide versus placebo in RBC transfusion-dependent patients with Low-/Intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with del5q. MDS-004 Lenalidomide del5q Study Group. Blood. 2011;118:3765–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. List A, Dewald G, Bennett J, Giagounidis A, Raza A, Feldman E, et al. Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1456–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Oliva EN, Cuzzola M, Aloe Spiriti MA, Poloni A, Laganà C, Rigolino C, et al. Biological activity of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes with del5q: results of gene expression profiling from a multicenter phase II study. Ann Hematol. 2013;92:25–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zeidan AM, Gore SD, Mc Nally DL, Baer MR, Hendrick F, Mahmoud D, et al. Lenalidomide Performance in the real World. Patterns of use and effectiveness in a Medicare Population with myelodysplastic Syndromes. Cancer. 2013;119:3870–388.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kantarjian H, Pinto A, Schiffer CA, Nimer SD. Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2000;96:3671–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, Buresh A, Mahadevan D, Fuchs D, et al. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:549–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Adès L, Le Bras F, Sebert M, Kelaidi C, Lamy T, Dreyfus F, et al. Treatment with lenalidomide does not appear to increase the risk of progression in lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion. A comparative analysis by the Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies. Haematologica. 2012;97:213–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Le Bras F, Sebert M, Kelaidi C, Lamy T, Dreyfus F, Delaunay J, et al. Treatment by Lenalidomide in lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome with 5q deletion–the GFM experience. Leuk Res. 2011;35:1444–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Göhring G, Giagounidis A, Büsche G, Kreipe HH, Zimmermann M, Hellström-Lindberg E, et al. Patients with del(5q) MDS who fail to achieve sustained erythroid or cytogenetic remission after treatment with lenalidomide have an increased risk for clonal evolution and AML progression. Ann Hematol. 2010;89:365–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. List AF, Bennett JM, Sekeres MA, Skikne B, Fu T, Shammo JM, et al. Extended survival and reduced risk of AML progression in erythroid-responsive lenalidomide-treated patients with lower-risk del(5q) MDS. Leukemia. 2014;28:1033–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Butrym et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement