Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (CIP2A) is an independent prognostic marker in wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy

  • Kuen-Feng Chen5, 6,
  • Chueh-Chuan Yen1, 4,
  • Jen-Kou Lin2, 4,
  • Wei-Shone Chen2, 4,
  • Shung-Haur Yang2, 4,
  • Jeng-Kai Jiang2, 4,
  • Yuan-Tzu Lan2, 4,
  • Chun-Chi Lin2, 4,
  • Hui-Chuan Yu5, 6,
  • Hui-Mei Hsu2, 4,
  • Wen-Ling Lin2, 4 and
  • Hao-Wei Teng1, 3, 4Email author
BMC Cancer201515:301

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1300-3

Received: 18 March 2014

Accepted: 31 March 2015

Published: 17 April 2015

Abstract

Background

The impact of KRAS signaling on cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (CIP2A) expression has not yet been explored. We investigated the impact of KRAS on CIP2A expression in colorectal cancer patients after colorectal liver metastasectomy.

Methods

We examined CIP2A expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and used direct sequencing to identify the mutational status of KRAS exon 2 (codon 12 and 13). The association between CIP2A expression, KRAS genotype, clinicopathological parameters and survival were examined by the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. A combination of immunoblotting and proliferation assays were employed to elucidate the role of CIP2A in signal transduction pathways in wild-type KRAS Caco-2 cells.

Results

A total of 220 colorectal cancer patients who had undergone colorectal liver metastasectomy were included in the study. The mutant KRAS genotype was associated with CIP2A overexpression. CIP2A expression was an independent prognostic marker in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy (relative risk = 1.873, P = 0.019). Targeted silencing of CIP2A in Caco-2 cells (wild-type KRAS) led to decreased expression of pERK/ERK and decreased cell proliferation. Overexpression of mutant KRAS G12D in Caco-2 cells led to an increase in CIP2A expression and cell proliferation. In Caco-2 cells with the KRAS G12D, KRAS overexpression preserved the regulation effect of CIP2A in KRAS and abrogated the impact of CIP2A regulation on pERK/ERK and cell proliferation. CIP2A inhibition also increased the efficacy of cetuximab in Caco-2 cells.

Conclusions

CIP2A is an independent prognostic marker in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy.

Keywords

CIP2A Colorectal neoplasm KRAS Liver Metastasectomy

Background

Approximately one-third of patients with colorectal cancer develop metastatic disease, with metastases commonly occurring in the liver [1,2]. The standard treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastasis is colorectal liver metastasectomy [2]; however, the rate of recurrence is high (~70%) for first-time colorectal liver metastasectomy patients [3-5]. Thus, the identification of novel oncogenes or targets as biomarkers for colorectal liver cancer recurrence is necessary.

Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (CIP2A) is a recently identified oncoprotein that is overexpressed in several malignancies, including leukemia, breast, gastric, prostate, lung, ovarian, head and neck carcinoma, and colorectal cancer [6-21]. CIP2A plays an important role in cell proliferation, transformation, drug resistance and maintenance of a malignant cellular phenotype [22]. Notably, CIP2A is associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway (Figure 1). CIP2A expression is positively correlated with EGFR expression and amplification in serous ovarian cancer [23]. Furthermore, in hepatoma cells, CIP2A expression is also associated with resistance to the anti-EGFR bio-agent, erlotinib (Tarceva), in vitro [24]. It is well documented that EGFR signaling is the most important pathway in treating metastatic colorectal cancer [25,26]. Therefore, the interplay between EGFR signaling and CIP2A in metastatic colorectal cancer warrants further investigation.
Figure 1

Model of CIP2A involvement in the EGFR-RAS signaling pathways. ETS1 mediates CIP2A overexpression in human cancers with increased EGFR-MEK-ERK pathway activity. A positive feedback loop of CIP2A and MEK/ERK signaling pathways is shown.

V-Ki-Ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene (KRAS) is the most important downstream effector in the EGFR pathway. Approximately 40% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer carry KRAS mutations affecting codons 12 and 13 in exon 2 [5]. Indeed, mutation of KRAS is a predictive marker of cetuximab efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients [26,27]. However, to date, the prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer remains inconclusive [5,28-33]. Our previous study in colorectal cancer cell lines revealed that the KRAS G12D mutation decreased the impact of CIP2A on downstream effectors of the EGFR signaling pathway, when cells were treated with temsirolimus [34]. To the best of our knowledge, the interaction between KRAS mutant status and CIP2A has not been previously explored following colorectal liver metastasectomy.

In this study, we therefore investigated the association of CIP2A expression and KRAS genotype in the context of colorectal liver metastasectomy. We found that CIP2A only acts as an independent prognostic marker in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy.

Methods

Patients and tissue blocks

A total of 220 patients undergoing colorectal liver metastasectomy at Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan, were enrolled in our study between January 2000 and January 2010. Disease stage was assessed based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, 6th edition. Clinicopathological staging and clinical course were determined by searching a computer database containing detailed information. The medical residual samples of patients came from residual sample bank of Taipei Veterans General Hospital and this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Veterans General Hospital (VGHIRB No 2012-03-027BC). Thus, The VGHIRB waive the requirement of inform consent form. The decision to perform hepatic resection was made by a multidisciplinary specialist committee. After hepatic resection, decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy were made on an individual patient basis at the discretion of the attending physicians. Patients were followed until the end of assessment (March 2012) or death, whichever occurred earlier. Patient follow-ups occurred at least every 3 months from the time of hepatic resection for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for the next 5 years, and subsequently annually until the patient’s death. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period from liver surgery to death due to cancer.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

CIP2A expression was assessed by IHC using monoclonal antibodies to CIP2A (NB100-74663, 1:1200; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA). IHC staining was performed as previously described [10]. Negative (no primary antibody) and positive tissue controls (colon carcinoma) were stained in parallel with each set of tumor specimens studied.

IHC staining was evaluated by two pathologists who were unaware of the patients’ clinical information. The intensity of stained cells was scored as 0, 1, 2 or 3. Percentages of stained cells were counted, and a final immunohistochemical score (H-score) was calculated by summing the products of the staining intensities (0–3) and distributions (0–100%). H-scores ranged from 0–300. For CIP2A staining, an H-score of  ≥ 150 points was defined as strongly positive, whereas an H-score of < 150 points was defined as weakly positive.

DNA extraction and KRAS mutation analyses

Tumor regions were macrodissected and examined to confirm that at least 80% of the cells in the tissue were cancer cells. DNA extraction was performed using a Nucleon HT DNA extraction kit (Piscataway, NJ, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Exon 2 of KRAS was separately amplified as previously described [35]. Purified PCR products were sequenced using the BigDyeR Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and analyzed using a 3730 ABI capillary electrophoresis system (Applied Biosystems).

Cell culture and transfection

The Caco-2 human colon cancer cell line, harboring wild-type KRAS (American Type Culture Collection; ATCC) was maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Gibco, Grand Island, USA). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of air and 5% CO2. Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, USA). The KRAS wild type genotype in Caco-2 cells was confirmed by analysis of KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations.

Cell viability assay

Caco-2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (10,000 cells/well) and after incubation for 12 h, cells were treated with cetuximab (Merck, Taiwan). Cell viability was then assessed using the TACS MTT cell proliferation assay kit (TREVIGEN, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The dose–response or time-response curves were analyzed using GraphPad Software (Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA, USA).

Immunoblot analysis

Immunoblot analysis was performed as previously described [10]. The following proteins were evaluated by immunoblot: CIP2A (1:500; Novus Biologicals, CO, USA), pERK (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA), ERK (1:5000; Zymed, Grand Island, NY, USA) and β-actin (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). β-actin was used as a loading control. Immunoblot quantification was performed using Image J software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html).

Knockdown of CIP2A and KRAS in colon cancer cells

The siRNA construct targeting CIP2A (pLKO.1-shCIP2A, TRCN0000135532, target sequence: (5′-CCACAGTTTAAGTGGTGGAAA-3′) and non-targeting siRNA control (pLKO.1-shLuc) were obtained from the National RNAi Core Facility, Taiwan (http://rnai.genmed.sinica.edu.tw/index). Lentivirus production and infection were performed as previously described [10]. The KRAS G12D mutant construct (pCMV6-Entry-KRAS G12D, RC400104) and control vector (pCMV6-AC-GFP, PS100010) were purchased from Origene (Rockville, Maryland, USA).

Statistical and survival analyses

The correlations between clinicopathological variables and genomic alterations were analyzed by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test was used for comparison of survival curves as well as for univariate analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied for multivariate analyses. Variables with P-values ≤ 0.010 in the log-rank test were entered in multivariate analyses. The t-test was used to compare data from the proliferation studies. A two-sided P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS software (version 16.00, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Patient characteristics and association of clinical parameters with CIP2A expression

A total of 220 patients who had undergone colorectal liver metastasectomy were enrolled in our study (Table 1). The median age at diagnosis was 62.0 years (range: 30–87 years). The median OS after colorectal liver metastasectomy was 51.0 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 52.7%. To investigate the association between CIP2A expression and patient clinical parameters, CIP2A expression was examined in colorectal liver metastases sections by IHC staining (representative images are shown in Figure 2a and b). Ninety-one patients (41.4%) exhibited strong CIP2A expression. CIP2A expression was not significantly correlated with sex, age, initial stage at diagnosis, location of primary tumor, pathology, grade, margin, distribution of liver metastasis, number of liver metastases, size of liver metastasis or extrahepatic metastasis. However, CIP2A overexpression was associated with KRAS mutation status (P < 0.001). Among patients with KRAS codon 12 mutations, 57.6% exhibited strong CIP2A expression. Among patients with KRAS codon 13 mutations, 54.5% exhibited strong CIP2A expression. Only 30.5% of patients with the wild-type KRAS genotype exhibited strong CIP2A expression.
Table 1

Association between clinicopathological parameters and CIP2A expression in patients after colorectal liver metastasectomy

n = 220

CIP2A

 
  

Weak expression

Strong expression

 
  

n

(%)

n

(%)

P-value

Sex

Female

44

(53.7)

38

(46.3)

0.248

 

Male

85

(61.6)

53

(38.4)

 

Age (y/o)

≤65

80

(63.5)

46

(36.5)

0.090

 

>65

49

(52.1)

45

(47.9)

 

Initial stage at diagnosis

I-III

57

(44.2)

30

(33.0)

0.094

 

IV

72

(55.8)

61

(67.0)

 

Location

Colon

88

(57.5)

65

(42.5)

0.610

 

Rectum

41

(61.2)

26

(38.8)

 

Pathology

Adenocarcinoma

127

(59.6)

86

(40.4)

0.101

 

Mucinous adenocarcinoma

2

(28.6)

5

(71.4)

 

Grade

Low

121

(93.8)

90

(98.9)

0.060

 

High

8

(6.2)

1

(1.1)

 

Margin

R0-1

125

(96.9)

88

(96.7)

0.935

 

R2

4

(3.1)

3

(3.3)

 

Distribution

Unilateral

113

(59.8)

76

(40.2)

0.392

 

Bilateral

16

(51.6)

15

(48.4)

 

Number

≤3

101

(60.1)

67

(39.9)

0.422

 

>3

28

(53.8)

24

(46.2)

 

Size (cm)

≤5

107

(59.8)

72

(40.2)

0.473

 

>5

22

(53.7)

19

(46.3)

 

Extrahepatic metastasis

No

107

(82.9)

74

(81.3)

0.756

 

Yes

22

(17.1)

17

(18.7)

 

KRAS

Wild-type

91

(69.5)

40

(30.5)

<0.001

 

Codon 12 mutation

28

(42.4)

38

(57.6)

 
 

G12D

13

(40.6)

19

(59.4)

 
 

G21V

7

(41.2)

10

(58.8)

 
 

G12C

5

(41.7)

7

(58.3)

 
 

G12R

1

(100.0)

0

(0.0)

 
 

G12S

2

(50.0)

2

(50.0)

 
 

Codon 13 mutation

10

(45.5)

12

(54.5)

 
 

G13D

9

(45.0)

11

(55.0)

 
 

G13C

0

(0.0)

1

(100.0)

 
 

G13V

1

(100.0)

0

(0.0)

 
 

Codon 14 mutation

0

(0.0)

1

(100.0)

 
 

V14I

0

(0.0)

1

(100.0)

 

Abbreviations: CIP2A Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A, KRAS v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog.

Figure 2

Immunohistochemical (IHC analysis of CIP2A expression in patients with colorectal cancer. Representative examples of CIP2A expression: (a) strong expression in colorectal liver metastasis, (b) weak expression in colorectal liver metastasis, (c) staining in paired colon cancer, (d) colorectal metastasis tissues, and (e) H-score in paired colon cancer and liver metastasis samples. CIP2A was not consistently overexpressed in colon cancer compared with colorectal liver metastasis in paired tissue specimens.

The intensity of CIP2A staining in paired colon cancer and colorectal liver metastasis samples was also compared in 24 patients (representative images are shown in Figure 2c and d). CIP2A expression was similar between paired colon cancer and colorectal liver metastasis samples, with no significant difference in H-score between primary and metastatic tumors (Figure 2e).

Prognostic factors for OS according to univariate and multivariate analyses in patients after colorectal liver metastasectomy

To clarify the role of CIP2A in patients following colorectal liver metastasectomy, the Cox proportional hazards model was applied (Table 2). In the univariate model, initial stage at diagnosis, number of colorectal liver metastases, margin and CIP2A expression (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.447, P = 0.049) were prognostic factors. However, in the multivariate model, CIP2A expression was not an independent prognostic factor after controlling for other risk factors (HR = 1.373, P = 0.096).
Table 2

Prognostic factors for overall survival according to univariate and multivariate analyses in patients with both wild-type and mutant KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy

n = 220

Univariate

 

Multivariate

 

Variable

Hazard ratios (95% CI)

P-value

Hazard ratios (95% CI)

P-value

Age > 65 (y/o)

1.055 (0.729–1.526)

0.778

Initial stage IV at diagnosis

1.668 (1.129–2.462)

0.010

1.336 (0.885–2.016)

0.168

Bilobar liver metastases

1.494 (0.902–2.475)

0.119

Size > 5 cm

1.268 (0.803–2.002)

0.309

Number > 3

1.932 (1.287–2.903)

0.002

1.753 (1.151–2.670)

0.009

High grade

1.385 (0.915–2.096)

0.123

Margin R2

3.112 (1.350–7.172)

0.008

2.087 (1.200–6.567)

0.017

Extrahepatic metastasis

1.462 (0.937–2.282)

0.094

1.255 (0.798–1.973)

0.326

CIP2A overexpression

1.447 (1.001–2.092)

0.049

1.373 (0.946–1.992)

0.096

Abbreviations: CIP2A Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A, KRAS v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog.

Impact of CIP2A levels on OS in patients after colorectal liver metastasectomy according to KRAS genotype

OS after colorectal liver metastasectomy was significantly worse in patients with strong CIP2A expression compared with those with weak CIP2A expression, in patients with wild-type KRAS (Figure 3a, P = 0.035). In contrast, we observed no difference in OS between strong and weak CIP2A expression in patients with mutant KRAS (Figure 3b, P = 0.759).
Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier survival plot of overall survival (OS) by KRAS genotype. (a) OS was significantly worse in patients with wild type KRAS and strong CIP2A expression, compared with patients with wild type KRAS and weak CIP2A expression (P = 0.035). (b) No difference in OS associated with CIP2A expression was observed in mutant KRAS patients (P = 0.759).

Prognostic factors for OS according to univariate and multivariate analyses in patients with wild-type KRAS after colorectal liver metastasectomy

To clarify the role of CIP2A in patients exhibiting the wild-type KRAS genotype, the Cox proportional hazards model was applied (Table 3). In the univariate model, the number of colorectal liver metastases, grade, margin and CIP2A expression were prognostic factors, whereas age, initial stage at diagnosis, distribution, size of colorectal metastases and extrahepatic metastasis were not. Significant factors in the univariate model were subsequently used in the multivariate model. After controlling for other risk factors, CIP2A expression was still an independent prognostic factor in patients with wild-type KRAS genotype (HR = 2.109, P = 0.006).
Table 3

Prognostic factors for overall survival according to univariate and multivariate analyses in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy

n = 131

Univariate

 

Multivariate

 

Variable

Hazard ratios (95% CI)

P-value

Hazard ratios (95% CI)

P-value

Age > 65 (y/o)

1.045 (0.627–1.742)

0.865

Initial stage IV at diagnosis

1.660 (0.999–2.757)

0.050

1.445 (0.856–2.439)

0.168

Bilobar liver metastases

1.049 (0.477–2.308)

0.905

Size > 5 cm

0.865 (0.411–1.820)

0.703

Number > 3

2.045 (1.167–3.586)

0.013

2.084 (1.200–3.621)

0.009

High grade

1.863 (1.032–3.362)

0.039

2.031 (1.101–3.744)

0.023

Margin R2

3.559 (1.092–11.600)

0.035

3.701 (1.111–12.330)

0.033

Extrahepatic metastasis

1.472 (0.782–2.771)

0.231

CIP2A over-expression

1.751 (1.041–2.946)

0.035

2.109 (1.236–3.600)

0.006

Abbreviations: CIP2A Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A, KRAS v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog.

Association of CIP2A expression, KRAS genotype, cetuximab and proliferation in wild-type KRAS Caco-2 colon cancer cells

To explain our clinical findings, we conducted additional studies in Caco-2 colon cancer cells, which express wild-type KRAS. Targeted silencing of CIP2A using shCIP2A led to decreased expression of CIP2A, KRAS, and pERK (Figure 4a), and a concomitant decrease in cell proliferation (Figure 4b, P = 0.013). Overexpression of mutant KRAS (pCMV6-KRAS G12D, Figure 4a) led to increased expression of KRAS, CIP2A, and pERK, and increased cell proliferation (Figure 4b, P = 0.043). While targeted silencing of CIP2A also led to decreased CIP2A expression in cells transfected with pCMV6-KRAS G12D (Figure 4a), we did not observe a decrease in the expression of pERK/ERK or a significant decrease in proliferation. Last, the efficacy of cetuximab in Caco-2 cells increased after CIP2A knockdown compared with control (Figure 5).
Figure 4

Interaction between CIP2A, KRAS genotype and proliferation in the Caco-2 KRAS wild-type cell line. The result of immunoblot and proliferation assay is shown in (a) and (b), respectively. Column 1 vs. 2: CIP2A knockdown by shCIP2A resulted in decreased CIP2A, KRAS, and pERK expression as well as decreased proliferation; Column 1 vs. 3: KRAS overexpression by pCMV6-KRAS G12D resulted in increased KRAS, CIP2A, and pERK expression, as well as increased proliferation; Column 3 vs. 4: in Caco-2 cells with KRAS overexpression by pCMV6-KRAS G12D, knockdown of CIP2A by shCIP2A resulted in decreased CIP2A and KRAS expression. However, it did not cause significantly decreased pERK expression or decreased proliferation (*P < 0.05).

Figure 5

Silencing of CIP2A in Caco-2 cells leads to decreased resistance to cetuximab. Immunoblot analysis of CIP2A expression in control (shLuc) and CIP2A knockdown (shCIP2A) cells.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between CIP2A expression and KRAS genotype in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy. After adjusting for other confounding factors, we found that CIP2A acts as an independent prognostic marker in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy.

Overexpression of CIP2A is associated with tumor aggressiveness, lymph node and lymphovascular involvement, and advanced stage colon cancer, which may partially explain why CIP2A functions as a prognostic marker in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy [10,36]. CIP2A overexpression is also associated with colon cancer cell proliferation, tumorigenesis in vitro, and resistance to cetuximab, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and SN38 (an active metabolite of irinotecan) [10,34]. Cetuximab, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan are commonly used for post-operative chemotherapy after colorectal liver metastasectomy or for salvage chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer [3].

In our analysis, the value of CIP2A as a prognostic marker was limited to patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer after colorectal liver metastasectomy. This observation may be explained by multiple previous reports. First, Zhao et al. investigated Helicobacter pylori infection-induced CIP2A expression, and determined that it was dependent on RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathways, indicating that EGFR pathway activation increased CIP2A expression [37]. Khanna et al. [38] further concluded that CIP2A overexpression was dependent on the EGFR-ERK-ETS1 signaling pathway. Both studies illustrate that the EGFR pathway interacts with CIP2A in vitro and that the interaction is bi-directional. Furthermore, studies by Bockelman et al. demonstrated that EGFR protein expression and amplification were associated with CIP2A overexpression in vivo [23]. Similarly, we observed that a mutant KRAS genotype was associated with CIP2A overexpression. Finally, in colorectal cancer, the EGFR/RAS pathway is an important signaling pathway. KRAS is well established as an important downstream effector of the EGFR signaling pathway, and mutational activation of KRAS by further active downstream effectors like ERK induces drug resistance to EGFR antagonists (for example, cetuximab) [39]. The results of our cellular experiments support this finding. Indeed, we observed that targeted silencing of CIP2A in Caco-2 cells expressing mutant KRAS G12D led to decreased expression of CIP2A expression but not pERK/ERK. Overexpression of mutant KRAS G12D impaired the suppression of pERK/ERK and effects on cell proliferation mediated by CIP2A silencing. Based on the above results, CIP2A acts as a prognostic marker in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer following colorectal liver metastasectomy, because the mutational activation of KRAS weakens CIP2A regulation on cell survival.

One constraint of our study is that a limited number of patients received cetuximab (EGFR antagonist) as a bio-chemotherapy throughout the entire course of treatment. Thus, we could not demonstrate that CIP2A expression is a predictive marker of response to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with wild-type KRAS. Further studies are therefore required to investigate this relationship.

Conclusions

Mutant KRAS is associated with CIP2A overexpression. CIP2A is an independent prognostic marker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer exhibiting wild-type KRAS after colorectal liver metastasectomy.

Abbreviations

CIP2A: 

Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A

EGFR: 

Epidermal growth factor receptor

ETS1: 

v-ets avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 1

KRAS: 

v-Ki-Ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

MAPK: 

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

ERK: 

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Division of Experimental Surgery of the Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital (102DHA0100184 V101E2-006) and by the Taiwan Clinical Oncology Research Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
(2)
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
(3)
Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University
(4)
National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine
(5)
Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital
(6)
National Center of Excellence for Clinical Trial and Research, National Taiwan University Hospital

References

  1. Khatri VP, Petrelli NJ, Belghiti J. Extending the frontiers of surgical therapy for hepatic colorectal metastases: is there a limit? J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8490–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Primrose JN. Surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:1313–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Poston GJ, Adam R, Alberts S, Curley S, Figueras J, Haller D, et al. OncoSurge: a strategy for improving resectability with curative intent in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7125–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cummings LC, Payes JD, Cooper GS. Survival after hepatic resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Cancer. 2007;109:718–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Teng HW, Huang YC, Lin JK, Chen WS, Lin TC, Jiang JK, et al. BRAF mutation is a prognostic biomarker for colorectal liver metastasectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106:123–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Katz J, Jakymiw A, Ducksworth MK, Stewart CM, Bhattacharyya I, Cha S, et al. CIP2A expression and localization in oral carcinoma and dysplasia. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;10:694–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang LP, Adelson ME, Mordechai E, Trama JP. CIP2A expression is elevated in cervical cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2010;8:309–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Vaarala MH, Vaisanen MR, Ristimaki A. CIP2A expression is increased in prostate cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:136.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kerosuo L, Fox H, Perala N, Ahlqvist K, Suomalainen A, Westermarck J, et al. CIP2A increases self-renewal and is linked to Myc in neural progenitor cells. Differentiation. 2010;80:68–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Teng HW, Yang SH, Lin JK, Chen WS, Lin TC, Jiang JK, et al. CIP2A is a predictor of poor prognosis in colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1037–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Xue Y, Wu G, Wang X, Zou X, Zhang G, Xiao R, et al. CIP2A is a predictor of survival and a novel therapeutic target in bladder urothelial cell carcinoma. Med Oncol. 2013;30:406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tseng LM, Liu CY, Chang KC, Chu PY, Shiau CW, Chen KF. CIP2A is a target of bortezomib in human triple negative breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R68.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Come C, Laine A, Chanrion M, Edgren H, Mattila E, Liu X, et al. CIP2A is associated with human breast cancer aggressivity. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5092–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. He H, Wu G, Li W, Cao Y, Liu Y. CIP2A is highly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma and predicts poor prognosis. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2012;21:143–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang J, Li W, Li L, Yu X, Jia J, Chen C. CIP2A is over-expressed in acute myeloid leukaemia and associated with HL60 cells proliferation and differentiation. Int J Lab Hematol. 2011;33:290–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Qu W, Li W, Wei L, Xing L, Wang X, Yu J. CIP2A is overexpressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oncol. 2012;29:113–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li W, Ge Z, Liu C, Liu Z, Bjorkholm M, Jia J, et al. CIP2A is overexpressed in gastric cancer and its depletion leads to impaired clonogenicity, senescence, or differentiation of tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3722–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fang Y, Li Z, Wang X, Zhang S. CIP2A is overexpressed in human ovarian cancer and regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:2299–306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dong QZ, Wang Y, Dong XJ, Li ZX, Tang ZP, Cui QZ, et al. CIP2A is Overexpressed in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Correlates with Poor Prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;18:857–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin YC, Chen KC, Chen CC, Cheng AL, Chen KF. CIP2A-mediated Akt activation plays a role in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:585–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yu G, Liu G, Dong J, Jin Y. Clinical implications of CIP2A protein expression in breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2013;30:524.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Junttila MR, Puustinen P, Niemela M, Ahola R, Arnold H, Bottzauw T, et al. CIP2A inhibits PP2A in human malignancies. Cell. 2007;130:51–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bockelman C, Lassus H, Hemmes A, Leminen A, Westermarck J, Haglund C, et al. Prognostic role of CIP2A expression in serous ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:989–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen KF, Pao KC, Su JC, Chou YC, Liu CY, Chen HJ, et al. Development of erlotinib derivatives as CIP2A-ablating agents independent of EGFR activity. Bioorg Med Chem. 2012;20:6144–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Park JH, Han SW, Oh DY, Im SA, Jeong SY, Park KJ, et al. Analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PTEN, IGF1R, EGFR intron 1 CA status in both primary tumors and paired metastases in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in colon cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;68:1045–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, Makhson A, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann JT, de Braud F, Schuch G, Zubel A, et al. Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1535–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Andreyev HJ, Norman AR, Cunningham D, Oates JR, Clarke PA. Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the multicenter “RASCAL” study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:675–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. French AJ, Sargent DJ, Burgart LJ, Foster NR, Kabat BF, Goldberg R, et al. Prognostic significance of defective mismatch repair and BRAF V600E in patients with colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3408–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kakar S, Deng G, Sahai V, Matsuzaki K, Tanaka H, Miura S, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics, CpG island methylator phenotype, and BRAF mutations in microsatellite-stable colorectal cancers without chromosomal instability. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:958–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, Kawasaki T, Meyerhardt JA, Loda M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability, BRAF mutation and clinical outcome in colon cancer. Gut. 2009;58:90–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Roth AD, Tejpar S, Delorenzi M, Yan P, Fiocca R, Klingbiel D, et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60–00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:466–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yokota T, Ura T, Shibata N, Takahari D, Shitara K, Nomura M, et al. BRAF mutation is a powerful prognostic factor in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:856–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang HW, Yang SH, Huang GD, Lin JK, Chen WS, Jiang JK, et al. Temsirolimus enhances the efficacy of cetuximab in colon cancer through a CIP2A-dependent mechanism. J Can Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:561–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Tol J, Nagtegaal ID, Punt CJ. BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:98–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Peng XY, Chen W, Zhou K, Fu JP, Fu P. Zeng QL: [Expression of cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A in tissue microarray of colorectal cancer and its clinical significance]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013;16:1102–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao D, Liu Z, Ding J, Li W, Sun Y, Yu H, et al. Helicobacter pylori CagA upregulation of CIP2A is dependent on the Src and MEK/ERK pathways. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:259–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Khanna A, Okkeri J, Bilgen T, Tiirikka T, Vihinen M, Visakorpi T, et al. ETS1 mediates MEK1/2-dependent overexpression of cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (CIP2A) in human cancer cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17979.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Arena S, Saletti P, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5705–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement