Malignant degeneration of burn scars has been reported as early as in the first century by Celsus. However, the classic description was published by Jean-Nicholas Marjolin in 1828, who indeed did not regard the lesion as malignant [1]. The entity „Marjolin's ulcer“, which is commonly used for carcinoma arising in post-traumatic scars, has been applied ever since the report of Da Costa in 1903, who first used the term [2]. Today the term "Marjolin's ulcer" is generally used for squamous cell carcinoma arising in posttraumatic scars. However squamous cell carcinoma has recently been reported to arise also from other skin lesions such as Fournier's gangrene[3]. There have been some case reports of burn scar carcinomas of the scalp [4–6], a localization not as common as the lower extremity but still making up approximately 14% of burn scar carcinomas[7]. Due to involvement of the skull and brain, wide excision can require complex reconstructions including free flap transfer. Utilizing previously anastomosed recipient vessels of an earlier transposed free flap as new donor vessels, may serve as an ideal tool for secondary free flap surgery in cases of local recurrence, as in the reported case.

In this case report we describe a surgical approach to a recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp that resulted in particular problems for recontructive surgery. Our approach involved the sequential transfer of a free radial forearm flap after first tumour resection and the subsequent use of the radial vessels as recipient vessels for a free latissimus dorsi flap after second tumour resection. In general treatment of squamous cell carcinoma developing in scars and chronic wounds includes wide local excision, which in many cases demands either extensive soft tissue coverage or even amputation if extremities are involved. Burn scar carcinomas of the scalp are relatively rare compared to extremity localization and primary intracranial malignancies have been falsely mistaken for those lesions [8].

When there is clinical involvement, lymph node dissection is necessary [9]. Marjolin's ulcers have been described as aggressive and are associated with high rates of nodal metastases and a poor prognosis. Two clinical types with different growth patterns are distinguished: on one hand the flat, indurated, infiltrative, ulcerative carcinoma, and on the other hand the exophytic papillary form, which is infrequent and generally less severe. It has also been advocated to subdivide the "Marjolin's ulcers" into 2 variants: acute with a latency of > one year and chronic with an average latency of 36 years[10]. A current meta-analysis determined an average interval between injury and development of Marjolin's ulcer of 32 years (+/- 19 years) [7]. The interval between the initial trauma and the onset of malignacy in our patient confirms this disease pattern of type one, variant two Marjolin's ulcer.

If an old burn scar begins to break down and ulcerate, it has been advocated to consider prophylactic wide local excision and simple skin grafting of the area [5]. For a long time Marjolin's ulcer had not been reported to arise from the site of a skin graft. However, burn scar carcinoma in a previously skin grafted area was described [11]. Deep second degree and in particular third degree burns should be grafted immediately, which can be addressed by different means like split and/or full thickness skin graft transplantation or in very extensive lesions by keratinocyte transplantation [12, 13]. Thus lower contracture rates and more sustainable wound healing can be achieved. Burns with unsuccessful grafting procedures are more susceptible to scar cancer formation than burns which have been fully successfully grafted. In the reported case the patient had not received skin grafting during acute phase of the trauma, neither was he treated for chronic wound healing impairment by skin grafting during the following years. Especially in cases of electrical burns, like in the presented case, early estimation and appropriate treatment would have been crucial [14]. Skin grafts would also not have been an option at the stage the patient presented to our clinic. Due to depth of infiltration, resulting in a post-excisional defect that needed durable and immediate soft tissue coverage to seal the subdural space and protect underlying structures, transfer of vascularized soft tissue was mandatory. This concept is similar to other indications in problem wounds as previously reported [15, 16].

In general, both size and depth have been recognized to be important factors conjuring up the need for free flap transplantations [17]. In our patient the free radial forearm flap was chosen because of the length of its vascular pedicle and the desirable flatness of a fasciocutaneous flap. Suitability of this flap for the given defect was advocated by other authors [18, 19].

After the rapid development of the relapsing tumor we had to create an even larger defect after to achieve complete tumour resection. Thus we were facing the demand for a larger soft tissue cover than after the first tumour resection. The favoring of the free latissimus dorsi muscle flap and its coverage with split thickness skin grafts was based on three advantages of this muscle flap: first all muscle flaps may solve defect problems even under extremely difficult local conditions by their vascularization. Secondly the large diameter of the vessels of the latissimus dorsi flap and its long, anatomically constant vascular pedicle promote safety of this operative procedure. Thirdly, the dimensions and thickness of this large, but flat free muscle flap can be nicely adapted to the convex surface of the skull. Covering the surface of the muscle flap with split thickness skin grafts leads to resistance against chronic mechanical stress and has a better aesthetic result. The particular problem in the presented case was to obtain a sufficient pedicle length, since the contralateral temporal artery was not available for anastomosis after the first tumour resection. Therefore, besides using the latissimus dorsi free flap with its long pedicle, it had to be combined with the preservation and use of the former radial flap vessels as new donor vessels. The concept of utilizing the vascular pedicle of a previous free flap while removing the rest of the flap is an interesting alternative to gain length and freedom of positioning a second required microvascular free flap. One disadvantage in the case of neoplasms involving the first flap might be an increased risk of local recurrence when preserving parts of the first pedicle. In the presented case, we tried to avoid this possibility by only preserving the proximal part of the pedicle.

Only few case reports have described one-step reconstruction with different free flaps sequentially connected in mandibular reconstruction: a fibular osseous free flap was combined with either a radial forearm flap or a lateral arm flap in six patients, with the latter flaps being connected to the distal peroneal vessels [20]. This approach demonstrated the versatility of sequential free flap coverage in cases where vascular access is limited, such as following head and neck surgery and radiation [20]. Sequential free flap transfer has twice been described as an approach to hand reconstruction [21, 22]. Serial multiple flap transfers as an operative sequence have also been described as an option in extensive burn reconstruction. In this case series, 2–3 flaps were preferably used from one donor site and transferred to one or two (extensive) defects during one operation [23]. However, these authors did not have to discard the first free flap and he flaps had not been connected consecutively but to two independent donor vessels.

In this case we demonstrate the feasibility of serial microvascular transplantations with removal of the primary flap while preserving the vessels to connect a secondary free flap in complex reconstructions of the scalp. The radial artery and concommitant vein were available as relatively large vessels, matching the thoracodorsal vessels. This approach might therefore be taken into account when planning complex microsurgical reconstructions, especially when discard of the first flap is mandatory like in the presented case.