- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
High nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of Cdk1 expression predicts poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients
- Wen-Wei Sung†1,
- Yueh-Min Lin†2, 3,
- Pei-Ru Wu2,
- Hsu-Heng Yen1, 4,
- Hung-Wen Lai2, 5,
- Tzu-Cheng Su2,
- Ren-Hung Huang2,
- Chun-Kai Wen1,
- Chia-Yu Chen2,
- Chih-Jung Chen1, 2, 3Email author and
- Kun-Tu Yeh1, 2Email author
© Sung et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014
- Received: 8 July 2014
- Accepted: 11 December 2014
- Published: 15 December 2014
Cdk1 (cyclin-dependent kinase 1) is critical regulator of the G2-M checkpoint. Cyclin-dependent kinase pathways are considered possible targets for cancer treatment; however, the prognostic role of Cdk1 in colorectal cancer is still controversial. Therefore, we attempted to determine the impact of Cdk1 on the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients to further identify its role in colorectal cancer.
Cdk1 immunoreactivity was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 164 cancer specimens from primary colorectal cancer patients. The medium follow-up time after surgery was 3.7 years (range: 0.01 to 13.10 years). The prognostic value of Cdk1 on overall survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models.
All samples displayed detectable Cdk1 expression with predominant location in the cytoplasm and nucleus. A high Cdk1 nuclear/cytoplasmic (N/C) expression ratio was correlated with poor overall survival (5-year survival rate: 26.3% vs 46.9%, N/C ratio ≥1.5 vs N/C ratio <1.5, log-rank p = 0.027). Accordingly, a Cdk1 N/C expression ratio ≥1.5 was identified as an independent risk factor by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 1.712, P = 0.039).
We suggest that Cdk1 N/C expression ratio determined by IHC staining could be an independent prognostic marker for colorectal cancer.
- Cyclin-dependent kinase 1
- Colorectal cancer
Colorectal cancer is one of the major causes of cancer deaths in the world, and identifying reliable prognostic markers is still an important issue for improving patients' outcomes . The clinical outcomes and treatment of patients with colorectal cancer mainly depend on tumor location and stage at diagnosis. Cancer metastasis, either before or after surgical resection, leads to significantly poor survival . Successful metastasis requires that the cancer cells enter the blood circulation, attach to the endothelium, invade the target distant organs, and subsequently form tumors [3, 4]. Recently, we found that cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) was overexpressed at the RNA level in circulating tumor cells of colorectal cancer when compared with control cells. This prompted us to investigate the role of Cdk1 in the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients.
Molecules involved in cell cycle regulation have been attracting considerable attention as potential prognostic and therapeutic cancer markers [5, 6]. Cdks are key regulators of cell cycle and RNA transcription  and cell cycle defects in tumors are often mediated by altered Cdk activities that result in unscheduled proliferation and genomic and chromosomal instability . Among Cdks, Cdk1 is sufficient for driving the cell cycle in all cell types, identifying its master role in regulating cell proliferation . Cdk1, formerly called cell division control protein 2 (Cdc2), interacts with cyclin B1 to form an active heterodimer that drives cells through mitosis [7, 8].
Cdk1 has been identified as a clinically useful prognostic marker in non-small cell lung cancer, colon cancer, and breast cancer [9–15]. However, its prognostic role is still controversial and more evidence is needed for further clinical application. A high specific activity of Cdk1 measured on 254 fresh-frozen tumor samples from stage II colon cancer patients was associated with short distant-metastasis-free intervals and poor prognosis . An association between high specific activity of Cdk1 and microsatellite-stable tumors provided molecular evidence to further support this finding . However, Meyer and colleagues revealed that patients with an ‘absent’ score for Cdk1 had poor cancer-related 5-year survival, indicating the absence of Cdk1 to be an independent prognostic marker in stage UICC II colon carcinoma . These conflicting results led us to investigate the role of Cdk1 in our patient population.
Interestingly, Zhang and colleagues found that Cdk1 was highly expressed in non-small cell lung cancer tumor tissues, but its loss from the cytoplasm could predict poor prognosis . This finding prompted us to consider that the prognostic role of Cdk1 might depend on its expression in the nucleus and cytoplasm. The aim of the present study was to clarify the prognostic implications of Cdk1 expression in the nucleus and cytoplasm in colorectal cancer.
In this study, we enrolled de-linked tissue specimens from 164 colorectal cancer patients and the written and oral consent was not obtained. Tissue collection was retrospective and all tissue was obtained from hospitals archives. The Institutional Review Board waived the need for consent. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Ethics Committee of the Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan (IRB no. 121008).
This study enrolled 164 colorectal cancer patients. The tumor tissues were collected from patients with confirmed histological diagnosis at Changhua Christian Hospital between 1997 and 2000. No patient underwent preoperative radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or any other treatment. Cancers were staged according to the AJCC Colon Cancer Staging, 7th edition (2009). Clinical data including sex, age, stage, T, N, and M stages, and follow-up information were obtained from medical records and the cancer registry.
Immunohistochemistry staining and evaluation of Cdk1 immunoreactivity
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed at the Department of Surgical Pathology, Changhua Christian Hospital, as previously described [16, 17]. IHC analyses were performed on tissue microarray sections (4 μm) of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, pre-chemotherapy primary colorectal tumors. The sections were placed on coated slides, washed with xylene to remove the paraffin, and rehydrated through serial dilutions of alcohol, followed by washings with a solution of phosphate buffered saline, PBS (pH = 7.2). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% H2O2. Antigen retrieval was performed by boiling in citrate buffer (10 mM) for 20 min. After incubation with the anti-human Cdk1 antibody (Cdc2 p34 antibody, 1:180 dilution; sc-166135, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 20 min at room temperature and thorough washing (three times with PBS). The immunoreaction was visualized using polymer-based MACH4 DAB Detection Kit (Biocare Medical) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to obtain optimal immunoreactivity and least background artifact. The slides were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)/Fab polymer conjugate for another 30 min. The sites of peroxidase activity were visualized using 3,3'-diamino-benzidine tetrahydrochloride as the substrate for 300 seconds and hematoxylin as the counterstain. Pathologically verified normal colon specimens were used as positive control (Additional file 1: Figure S1). PBS was used instead of primary antibodies as a negative control (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Immunoreactivity scores were analyzed by pathologists using scores defined as previously described [17, 18]. In brief, immunoreactivity scores were defined as the cell staining intensity (0 = nil; 1 = weak; 2 = moderate; and 3 = strong) multiplied by the percentage of stained cells (0–100%), leading to scores from 0 to 300. Cdk1 immunoexpression was assessed semiquantitatively by 2 pathologists (YML and CJC), who independently scored coded sections based on the staining score without knowledge of clinical and follow-up information. A final agreement was obtained for each score by using a multiheaded microscope (Olympus BX51 10 headed microscopes).
The Student t test, Fisher's exact test and the χ2 test were applied for continuous or discrete data analysis. The associations between the Cdk1 and patient survival were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and assessed using the log-rank test. Potential confounders were adjusted by Cox regression models, with the Cdk1 fitted as indicator variables. Overall survival time was defined as the interval between the date of surgery and the date of last follow-up or death. All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS statistical software program (version 15.0) (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). All statistical tests were 2-sided, and the values of P <0.050 were considered statistically significant.
Cdk1 is expressed in the majority of colorectal specimen and locates to both the cytoplasm and nucleus
Relationships of cytoplasm and nucleus Cdk1 expression with clinical parameters in colorectal cancer patients
Cytoplasm Cdk1 expression
Nucleus Cdk1 expression
64.1 ± 12.4
65.2 ± 13.9
64.5 ± 13.3
64.6 ± 12.7
The prognostic role of Cdk1 expression in the cytoplasm and nucleus of colorectal patients
We further verified the prognostic role of Cdk1 expression in colorectal patients. Overall survival data were collected and no data were missing among 164 patients. The mean and median follow-up times after surgery were 5.1 and 3.7 years (range from 0.01 to 13.10 years), respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 44.5%. During the survey, 138 patients died. We evaluated the possible correlation of Cdk1 expression and clinical outcome by grouping patients into four subgroups according to the quartile and median values of Cdk1 expression in the cytoplasm and nucleus (cut-off points were 180, 200, and 285 for the cytoplasm; and 150, 180, and 255 for the nucleus). Patients' survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cdk1 expression in cytoplasm and nucleus was not a significant prognostic marker in our study (log-rank test: p = 0.565 for cytoplasm expression and p = 0.688 for nucleus expression, Additional file 2: Figure S2). We further analyzed the prognostic value by Cox regression model, as shown in Additional file 3: Table S1. Neither cytoplasmic nor nuclear Cdk1 expression could predict clinical outcome in 5-year survival, univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis. Thus, we found no prognostic role of Cdk1 expression when examined separately in the cytoplasm and nucleus.
High nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of Cdk1 expression predicts poor prognosis in colorectal cancer
Relationships of nucleus/cytoplasm ratio (N/C ratio) of Cdk1 expression with clinical parameters in colorectal cancer patients
Cdk1 N/C ratio
65.3 ± 12.6
58.8 ± 14.5
Univariate analysis of the influence of various parameters on overall survival in colon cancer patients
5-year survival (%)
II + III + IV/I
Cdk1 N/C ratio
Multivariate analysis of the influence of various parameters on overall survival in colon cancer patients
5-year survival (%)
II + III + IV/I
Cdk1 N/C ratio
Cdk1 is a catalytic subunit that promotes the M-phase process and is essential for G1/S and G2/M phase transitions during cell proliferation [6, 20]. In addition, cyclin B-Cdk1 has been implicated in cell survival during the mitotic checkpoint (also known as the spindle assembly checkpoint) . Cancer cells with high Cdk1 expression appear to have greater cell proliferation capability, so that patients with this type of tumor might have poor outcomes . Thus, the use of small-molecule Cdk1 inhibitors could improve arrest at the G2-M boundary and prevent the entry of cancer cells into mitosis, thereby resulting in enhancement of apoptosis and tumor regression [21, 22]. These results suggest that Cdk1 might be more than just a therapeutic target but might serve as a predictor of the prognosis of cancer patients.
Cdk1 has been identified as a clinically useful prognostic marker in non-small cell lung cancer, colon cancer, and breast cancer [9–15]. High Cdk1 expression was associated with poor prognosis for cancer relapse, especially in node-negative breast cancer patients . Non-small cell lung cancer patients with high Cdk1 expression levels also had poorer overall and recurrence survival than those with lower Cdk1 expression . Interestingly, Zhang and colleagues found that although Cdk1 was highly expressed in non-small cell lung cancer tissues, its loss from the cytoplasm predicted poor survival and conferred resistance to chemotherapy both in vivo and in vitro. This result suggested that Cdk1 might have different biological roles depending on its expression in the nucleus and cytoplasm and this might give rise to different clinical outcomes.
The prognostic role of Cdk1 in colon cancer is still controversial. For example, Zeestraten and colleagues identified that Cdk1 but not Cdk2 can predict distant-metastasis-free survival and cause-specific survival in stage II colon cancer . Patients with high Cdk1 specific activity had significantly shorter distant-metastasis-free intervals compared with those with low Cdk1 specific activity . Although the Cdk1 expression had no association with ki-67 mitotic index, the prognostic results were further supported by the enhanced expression of Cdk1 in microsatellite-stable tumors . These findings were further supported by poor prognosis of colon cancer patients with microsatellite-stable tumors . However, Meyer and colleagues reported that the absence of Cdk1 expression by immunohistochemistry staining of tissue arrays was associated with significantly poor cancer-related 5-year survival in stage UICC II colon carcinoma . This study included patients with stage UICC II, III, and IV, and the prognostic role of Cdk1 in cancer-related 5-year survival risk was only observed in stage II but not in the other stages or when all stages were combined . These conflicting results prompted us to investigate the prognostic role of Cdk1 in our patient population.
Considering the report that loss of cytoplasmic Cdk1 expression predicts poor clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancer patients, we scored Cdk1 expression separately in the nucleus and cytoplasm . In our cases, all specimens had Cdk1 expression in cytoplasm and only 2 cases had no Cdk1 expression in nucleus. No Cdk1 expression was found in adjacent normal tissue. Cox regression analysis of our data indicated no significant association of tumor Cdk1 expression in the nucleus and cytoplasm with clinical outcome (Additional file 3: Table S1). Kaplan–Meier analysis gave a similar result (Additional file 2: Figure S2).
The nuclear translocation of cyclin B/CDC2 complexes, which is required for the initiation of mitosis, is inhibited by 14-3-3σ. The 14-3-3 σ gene undergoes frequent epigenetic silencing in several types of cancer due to aberrant CpG methylation of specific promoters. Therefore we combined cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of Cdk1 as the N/C ratio for further analysis . Interestingly, patients with high N/C ratios had lower 5-year survival rates than those with low N/C ratios (Table 3). Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic role of Cdk1 when grouped by N/C ratio (Table 4). This might reflect the poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients with tumors that lost cytoplasm Cdk1 expression .
The present study reveals a novel strategy for the use of the Cdk1 N/C ratio rather than the Cdk1 expression in the entire cancer cell for predicting prognosis of colon cancer patients. Our results suggested that Cdk1 might have a different prognostic role depending on the cancer type and the location of Cdk1 expression.
In this study, we found no prognostic role of Cdk1 expression in the cytoplasm and nucleus, respectively. However, Cdk1 N/C expression ratio determined by IHC staining could be an independent prognostic marker for colorectal cancer.
This work was jointly supported by grants from IBMS-CRC96-P04 (Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan) and 103-CCH-IRP-091 (Changhua Christian Hospital, Taiwan).
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013, 63 (1): 11-30. 10.3322/caac.21166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolpin BM, Meyerhardt JA, Mamon HJ, Mayer RJ: Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007, 57 (3): 168-185. 10.3322/canjclin.57.3.168.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Craene B, Berx G: Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013, 13 (2): 97-110. 10.1038/nrc3447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thiery JP, Lim CT: Tumor dissemination: an EMT affair. Cancer Cell. 2013, 23 (3): 272-273. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.03.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shapiro GI: Cyclin-dependent kinase pathways as targets for cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24 (11): 1770-1783. 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.7689.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malumbres M, Barbacid M: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9 (3): 153-166. 10.1038/nrc2602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi L, Nishioka WK, Th'ng J, Bradbury EM, Litchfield DW, Greenberg AH: Premature p34cdc2 activation required for apoptosis. Science. 1994, 263 (5150): 1143-1145. 10.1126/science.8108732.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castedo M, Perfettini JL, Roumier T, Kroemer G: Cyclin-dependent kinase-1: linking apoptosis to cell cycle and mitotic catastrophe. Cell Death Differ. 2002, 9 (12): 1287-1293. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SJ, Nakayama S, Miyoshi Y, Taguchi T, Tamaki Y, Matsushima T, Torikoshi Y, Tanaka S, Yoshida T, Ishihara H, Noguchi S: Determination of the specific activity of CDK1 and CDK2 as a novel prognostic indicator for early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008, 19 (1): 68-72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Nes JG, Smit VT, Putter H, Kuppen PJ, Kim SJ, Daito M, Ding J, Shibayama M, Numada S, Gohda K, Matsushima T, Ishihara H, Noguchi S, van de Velde CJ: Validation study of the prognostic value of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-based risk in Caucasian breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2009, 100 (3): 494-500. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604870.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim SJ, Nakayama S, Shimazu K, Tamaki Y, Akazawa K, Tsukamoto F, Torikoshi Y, Matsushima T, Shibayama M, Ishihara H, Noguchi S: Recurrence risk score based on the specific activity of CDK1 and CDK2 predicts response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancers. Ann Oncol. 2012, 23 (4): 891-897. 10.1093/annonc/mdr340.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perumal D, Singh S, Yoder SJ, Bloom GC, Chellappan SP: A novel five gene signature derived from stem-like side population cells predicts overall and recurrence-free survival in NSCLC. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (8): e43589-10.1371/journal.pone.0043589.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang C, Elkahloun AG, Robertson M, Gills JJ, Tsurutani J, Shih JH, Fukuoka J, Hollander MC, Harris CC, Travis WD, Jen J, Dennis PA: Loss of cytoplasmic CDK1 predicts poor survival in human lung cancer and confers chemotherapeutic resistance. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (8): e23849-10.1371/journal.pone.0023849.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zeestraten EC, Maak M, Shibayama M, Schuster T, Nitsche U, Matsushima T, Nakayama S, Gohda K, Friess H, van de Velde CJ, Ishihara H, Rosenberg R, Kuppen PJ, Janssen KP: Specific activity of cyclin-dependent kinase I is a new potential predictor of tumour recurrence in stage II colon cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012, 106 (1): 133-140. 10.1038/bjc.2011.504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyer A, Merkel S, Bruckl W, Schellerer V, Schildberg C, Campean V, Hohenberger W, Croner RS: Cdc2 as prognostic marker in stage UICC II colon carcinomas. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45 (8): 1466-1473. 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen CJ, Sung WW, Lin YM, Chen MK, Lee CH, Lee H, Yeh KT, Ko JL: Gender difference in the prognostic role of interleukin 6 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (11): e50104-10.1371/journal.pone.0050104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen CJ, Sung WW, Su TC, Chen MK, Wu PR, Yeh KT, Ko JL, Lee H: High expression of interleukin 10 might predict poor prognosis in early stage oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2013, 415: 25-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sung WW, Wang YC, Cheng YW, Lee MC, Yeh KT, Wang L, Wang J, Chen CY, Lee H: A polymorphic -844 T/C in FasL promoter predicts survival and relapse in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 17 (18): 5991-5999. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lodygin D, Hermeking H: The role of epigenetic inactivation of 14-3-3sigma in human cancer. Cell Res. 2005, 15 (4): 237-246. 10.1038/sj.cr.7290292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murray AW: Recycling the cell cycle: cyclins revisited. Cell. 2004, 116 (2): 221-234. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01080-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Connor DS, Wall NR, Porter AC, Altieri DC: A p34(cdc2) survival checkpoint in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2002, 2 (1): 43-54. 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00084-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Motwani M, Rizzo C, Sirotnak F, She Y, Schwartz GK: Flavopiridol enhances the effect of docetaxel in vitro and in vivo in human gastric cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003, 2 (6): 549-555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogino S, Shima K, Meyerhardt JA, McCleary NJ, Ng K, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Schaefer P, Whittom R, Hantel A, Benson AB, Spiegelman D, Goldberg RM, Bertagnolli MM, Fuchs CS: Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803. Clin Cancer Res. 2012, 18 (3): 890-900. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/951/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.