Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Gallbladder adenocarcinoma with sarcoid-like reaction in regional lymph nodes: report of a case

  • Yota Kawasaki1Email author,
  • Kosei Maemura1,
  • Hiroshi Kurahara1,
  • Yuko Mataki1,
  • Satoshi Iino1,
  • Masahiko Sakoda1,
  • Shinichi Ueno1,
  • Hiroyuki Shinchi1,
  • Sonshin Takao1 and
  • Shoji Natsugoe1
BMC Cancer201414:946

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-946

Received: 18 August 2014

Accepted: 6 December 2014

Published: 13 December 2014

Abstract

Background

Sarcoid-like reaction is often seen in various types of carcinoma, not only in the primary tumor, but also in regional lymph nodes, and can occur at any time, not only at the time of diagnosis, but also after treatment. However, few cases of hepatopancreatobiliary carcinoma, and no cases of gallbladder cancer with sarcoid-like reaction involving the lymph nodes have been described. This report is the first report of a sarcoid-like reaction involving the lymph nodes in a case of gallbladder cancer.

Case presentation

We encountered a rare case of gall bladder cancer with sarcoid-like reaction in the lymph nodes. Since regional lymph node swelling that was difficult to differentiate from metastasis was found preoperatively, swollen nodes were examined histologically using frozen sections. Based on this histology, the swollen nodes were diagnosed as showing sarcoid reaction and therefore extended lymphadenectomy was avoided. The patient did not receive any adjuvant chemotherapy and has shown no recurrence of disease as of 4 years after surgery.

Conclusion

Distinguishing between metastasis and sarcoid-like reaction in lymph nodes by preoperative imaging is still difficult. The present case shows that it is important to histologically examine swollen nodes by biopsy or by sampling before deciding on the treatment strategy for gall bladder cancer with swollen lymph nodes.

Keywords

Sarcoid-like reaction Gallbladder cancer Multiple swollen lymph nodes

Background

Sarcoid-like reaction is known to occur in patients with malignant disease and can occur at any time, not only at the time of diagnosis, but also after treatment [1]. Sarcoid-like reaction can be found in the stroma of the primary tumor itself, in lymph nodes draining the area of the primary tumor, and even in organs such as the liver, spleen, stomach and lungs [13].

Pathologically, sarcoid-like reaction includes non-caseating epithelioid cell granuloma that is comprised of a focal accumulation of epithelioid cells and multinucleated giant cells, and patients with sarcoid-like reaction show no clinical symptoms of systemic sarcoidosis. The non-caseating epithelioid granuloma is a result of antigen-specific cell-mediated immunity caused by macrophages and T-lymphocytes [4]. Although the pathogenesis of sarcoid-like reaction has been reported, no consensus has been reached on a complete definition. Sarcoid-like reaction is hypothesized to represent an antineoplastic immune phenomenon caused by antigenic factors derived from the tumor, with the high reactivity of the host immune system against such antigenic factors leading to the development of non-caseating epithelioid granuloma [2, 5].

Although many authors have reported sarcoid-like reactions in cancer patients, this finding appears to be very rare in patients with hepatopancreatobiliary cancer [6]. We report herein a rare case of gall bladder cancer with sarcoid reaction in the lymph nodes and no systemic sarcoid phenomenon.

Case presentation

A 73-year-old Japanese woman was referred to our institution after a gall bladder mass was detected on screening ultrasonography (US).The patient had no complaints, and both physical examination and laboratory findings (including carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19–9, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor) were unremarkable. When we performed US, a mass measuring 23 × 22 mm was identified at the fundus of the gall bladder. This broad-based, sessile mass showed preservation of the outer hyperechoic layer, suggesting gall bladder cancer. According to a previous report, these findings corresponded with a Type B image [7]. Tumor invasion seemed limited to the muscularis propria (cT1b) [7]. Computed tomography (CT) revealed several lymph nodes that were swollen to 7–15 mm, located at both the hepatoduodenal ligament and in the para-aortic area. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) showed a signal-hyperintense gallbladder mass, but signal hypointensity for all detected swollen lymph nodes (Figure 1). Based on such findings, the swollen nodes were diagnosed as metastases. As a preoperative summary, we regarded this tumor as clinically stage IIB (cT1b, cN1, cM0) based on the 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC).
Figure 1

Pre- and intraoperative images. a-c) Ultrasonography (US) shows a highly echoic mass in the gallbladder. The size was φ30 mm. The widespread lesion showed irregular, gross progression, corresponding to gallbladder cancer. Because the outer layer of the gallbladder was clearly preserved (especially on intraoperative US), indicating Type B, tumor depth was estimated as extending to the muscularis propria. Computed tomography (CT) also shows a mass in the gallbladder, with no invasion to other organs. d) US shows multiple swollen lymph nodes in the hepatoduodenal ligament. e-g) CT shows swelling of not only lymph nodes at the hepatoduodenal ligament, but also para-aortic lymph nodes. h,i) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) shows signal hyperintensity for the gallbladder mass, but signal hypointensity in all detected swollen lymph nodes.

Based on the above evidence of gallbladder cancer, we planned to perform radical cholecystectomy involving removal of the gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary tract with en-bloc subsegmental resection of the adjacent hepatic parenchyma of segments 4B and 5, and regional lymphadenectomy involving complete removal of the hepatoduodenal ligament lymph nodes, common hepatic artery nodes and retropancreatic nodes [8]. During surgery, we detected swollen lymph nodes. Four of these lymph nodes were dissected and frozen sections were histologically examined. Unlike typical metastatic lymph nodes, these nodes showed a smooth, round shape with clear margins, and were easy to dissect (Figure 2). Histological frozen-section examination revealed that none of the lymph nodes showed tumor involvement but instead they showed non-caseating epithelioid cell granuloma (Figure 2). We therefore only performed simple cholecystectomy, and some of the swollen nodes in the hepatoduodenal ligament were not dissected. Histological examination of the resected gall bladder showed papillary carcinoma with invasion limited to the muscularis propria. None of the dissected lymph nodes showed tumor involvement and all were diagnosed as showing non-caseating epithelioid cell granuloma. Accordingly, the patient was diagnosed with papillary adenocarcinoma of the gall bladder, stage IA (pT1b, pN0, pM0) (Figure 3). Because of the early stage of gall bladder cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy was not performed. As of 4 years postoperatively, the patient has shown no disease recurrence. During follow-up examination, the size of swollen nodes remaining in the hepatoduodenal ligament has gradually decreased compared to the initial size at the time of surgery (Figure 4).
Figure 2

Intraoperative findings. a) Macroscopically, no invasion to the serosa is evident. No shrinkage derived from invasion to the subserosa is seen. b,c) Swollen lymph nodes are easily dissected out, and the margins are clear. d) Frozen-section examination of swollen nodes shows only non-caseating epithelioid cell granuloma.

Figure 3

Macro- and microscopic findings. a) Macroscopic appearance of the gall bladder mass located in the fundus. b) Tumor infiltration to the muscularis layer is evident macroscopically. c) Tumor infiltration to the muscularis propria is evident microscopically. d) Final pathological examination of swollen lymph nodes shows only non-caseating epithelioid cell granuloma, with no evidence of metastasis in any dissected lymph node.

Figure 4

Course of remaining swollen lymph nodes. a) CT 5 months after surgery shows a remaining swollen lymph node (No. 12). The size is 15 × 11 mm. b) CT 46 months after surgery also shows the remaining swollen No. 12 lymph node. The size (11 × 8 mm) appears to be reduced compared to the initial examination.

Discussion

Sarcoid-like reaction related to a tumor was first reported in the early 19th Century [5]. Since then, such reactions have been reported with various carcinomas, such as those of the stomach, lungs, uterus and breast [3, 9, 10]. Brincker et al. [5] reported that sarcoid-like reactions may occur in 4.4% of cancer patients, 13.8% of patients with Hodgkin’s disease, and 7.3% of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In cases of carcinoma, sarcoid-like reaction is found in regional lymph nodes, particularly in non-metastatic lymph nodes. Few cases of hepatopancreatobiliary carcinoma with sarcoid-like reaction involving the lymph nodes have been described. Fong et al. [6] summarized 15 cases of hepatopancreatobiliary tumor with sarcoid-like reaction in 2012. However, only 19 cases in total have been reported to date (Table 1), and there have been no reports regarding sarcoid-like reaction in gallbladder cancer.
Table 1

Reports of sarcoid-like reactions in patients with hepatopancreatobiliary malignancy

Author

Year published

Journal

Age

Sex

Primary disease

Location of sarcoid reaction

Herxheimer G [11]

1917

Z Tuberk

N/A

N/A

Cholangiocarcinoma

Liver

Gherardi G [12]

1950

Arch Pathol

61

F

Cholangiocarcinoma

Peri-hepatic LN

Nadel EM [13]

1950

Am J Clin Pathol

64

M

Ampullary adenocarcinoma

Peri-pancreatic LN

Ten Seldam RE [14]

1956

Med J Australia

N/A

N/A

Cholangiocarcinoma

Lesser Omental LN

Muto Y [15]

1982

Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg

62

F

Cholangiocarcinoma

Hilar and pericystic LN

Schmidt D [16]

1985

Virchow Arch A Othhol Anat Hitopathol

N/A

N/A

Hepatoblastoma

Liver

Schmidt D [16]

1985

Virchow Arch A Othhol Anat Hitopathol

N/A

N/A

HCC

Liver

Van Steenbergen W [17]

1987

J Clin Gastroenterol

30

M

Cholangiocarcinoma

Liver and Hilar LN

Klein M [18]

1994

Chest

61

M

Cholangiocarcinoma

Hilar and paratracheal LN

Nakao A [19]

1996

Biliary Tract Pancreas

69

F

Cholangiocarcinoma

Peri-ductal LN

Shito M [20]

1997

Jpn J Surg

69

F

Cholangiocarcinoma

Peri-ductal LN

Onitsuka A [21]

2003

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg

74

F

Cholangiocarcinoma

Peri-ductal LN

Mao JT [22]

2000

Am J Med

71

M

PDA

Lung

Kurata A [23]

2005

Hum Pathol

44

M

PDA

Peri-pancreatic LN

Kurata A [23]

2005

Hum Pathol

60

M

PDA

Peri-pancreatic LN

Chowdhury FU [2]

2009

Clin Radiology

62

M

PDA

Sub-pleural LN

Fong ZV [6]

2012

J Gastrointest Surg

59

F

Cholangiocarcinoma

Spleen

Fong ZV [6]

2012

J Gastrointest Surg

68

F

IPMN

liver and bone

Mastroroberto M [24]

2012

Journal of the pancreas

52

M

NET, pancreas

Hilar and paratracheal LN

PDA: pancreatic adenocarcinoma, IPMN: intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, NET: neuroendcrine tumor F: female, M: male, LN: lymph node.

Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm of biliary tract cancer, and unfortunately the prognosis is well known to be very poor [25]. In many cases, gall bladder cancer is already at an advanced stage by the time of detection and diagnosis [8]. Lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor for this tumor, as it is for other malignant tumors. Preoperative diagnosis of the presence or absence of nodal metastasis is thus important when planning a surgical strategy. In the case of node positive gallbladder cancer (except for positive para-aortic lymph nodes), although there is certainly some controversy, it is considered that “aggressive” radical surgery such as combined resection of the liver and the common bile duct together with extended lymphadenectomy might contribute to better prognosis [26, 27]. In the present case, we preoperatively diagnosed multiple nodal swellings observed by imaging as positive evidence of metastasis. Distinct radiographic patterns that can distinguish sarcoid-like reaction, sarcoidosis and carcinoma have not yet been identified [1]. If the differential diagnosis of lymph node swelling is difficult, intraoperative histological examination of frozen sections is essential. In this case, we were able to avoid extended lymphadenectomy, because the histological results showed a sarcoid-like reaction. Some authors have reported that preoperative biopsy through endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may represent a useful method for analysis of such nodes [1, 28, 29].

The medical records of this patient included no symptoms or signs related to systemic sarcoidosis, such as erythema nodosum, uveitis, acute polyarthritis, respiratory illness, fatigue, malaise, weight loss or fever [30]. Moreover, no serum abnormalities such as hypercalcemia or elevated levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme were seen. Accordingly, we speculate that the development of non-caseating epithelioid cell granuloma in this patient was not caused by systemic sarcoidosis, but rather by a sarcoid-like reaction related to gallbladder cancer. Sarcoid-like reactions are comprised of different inflammatory cells, mature dendritic cells and T lymphocytes in non-caseating epithelioid cell granulomas [23]. Infiltration of tumors by dendritic cells reflects a host immune defense mechanism [31]. It is well known that the presence of dendritic cells and T lymphocytes in tumors is associated with better prognosis, reduced tumor recurrence and fewer metastases [3236]. Although no consensus has been reached, these evidences seem to suggest that patients with a malignant tumor that shows a sarcoid-like reaction may have a better prognosis [37]. Indeed, our patient has shown long-term survival and no recurrence after surgery.

Few reports have focused on the course of swollen nodes after resection of a primary cancer. Interestingly, in this case, the residual swollen nodes gradually decreased in size after resection of the gallbladder cancer. This phenomenon clinically supports the view that sarcoid-like reaction results from high reactivity of the host immune system against antigenic factors from the primary cancer.

Conclusion

We encountered a case of sarcoid-like reaction related to gallbladder cancer. Distinguishing between metastasis and sarcoid-like reaction in lymph nodes by preoperative imaging is still difficult. The present case shows that it is important to histologically examine swollen nodes by biopsy or sampling before deciding on the treatment strategy for gall bladder cancer with swollen lymph nodes.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of this written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. This study was approved by the institutional ethics review board of Kagoshima University Hospital (reference number 25–39).

Abbreviations

US: 

Ultrasonography

CT: 

Computed tomography CT

DWI: 

Diffusion-weighted imaging DWI

UICC: 

Union for International Cancer Control

EUS-FNA: 

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine needle aspiration.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We declare that each author received no funding for this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kagoshima University

References

  1. Craun JB, Banks KP, Clemenshaw MN, Moren RW: Sarcoidlike reaction of neoplasia causing hypermetabolic thoracic adenopathy in setting of extrathoracic malignancy: report of two cases and a review of the differential diagnostic considerations. J Nucl Med Technol. 2012, 40 (4): 231-235. 10.2967/jnmt.112.102814.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chowdhury FU, Sheerin F, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV: Sarcoid-like reaction to malignancy on whole-body integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT: prevalence and disease pattern. Clin Radiol. 2009, 64 (7): 675-681. 10.1016/j.crad.2009.03.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Murata Y, Tachibana T: Sarcoid reactions in malignant tumor. Kekkaku: Tuberculosis. 1979, 54 (10): 510-511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sugiyama Y, Oshikawa K: Mechanism of sarcoid granuloma formation–participation of cytokines and chemokines. Nihon Rinsho. 2002, 60 (9): 1728-1733.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brincker H: Sarcoid reactions in malignant tumours. Cancer Treat Rev. 1986, 13 (3): 147-156. 10.1016/0305-7372(86)90002-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fong ZV, Wong J, Maley WR, Sandorfi N, Winter JM, Koniaris LG, Sauter PK, Yeo CJ, Lavu H: Sarcoid-reaction mimicking metastatic malignant hepatopancreatobiliary tumors: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012, 16 (6): 1245-1250. 10.1007/s11605-011-1820-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sadamoto Y, Kubo H, Harada N, Tanaka M, Eguchi T, Nawata H: Preoperative diagnosis and staging of gallbladder carcinoma by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003, 58 (4): 536-541. 10.1067/S0016-5107(03)01961-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Reid KM, Ramos-De la Medina A, Donohue JH: Diagnosis and surgical management of gallbladder cancer: a review. J Gastroint Surg. 2007, 11 (5): 671-681. 10.1007/s11605-006-0075-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregorie HB, Othersen HB, Moore MP: The significance of sarcoid-like lesions in association with malignant neoplasms. Am J Surg. 1962, 104: 577-586. 10.1016/0002-9610(62)90399-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kamiyoshihara M, Hirai T, Kawashima O, Ishikawa S, Morishita Y: Sarcoid reactions in primary pulmonary carcinoma: report of seven cases. Oncol Rep. 1998, 5 (1): 177-180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Herxheimer G: Uber Karzinom und Tuberkulose. Z Tuberk. 1917, 27: 251-Google Scholar
  12. Gherardi G: Localized lymph node sarcoidosis associated with carcinoma of the bile ducts; report of a case. AMA Arch Pathol. 1950, 49 (2): 163-168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nadel E: Lesions resembling Boeck’s sarcoid in lymph nodes draining an area containing a malignant neoplasm. Am J Clin Pathol. 1950, 20 (10): 952-957.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ten Seldam R: Sarcoid-like lesions in lymph nodes draining carcinoma. Med Aust. 1956, 43 (22): 916-919.Google Scholar
  15. Muto Y, Uchimira M, Waki S, Hayashi T, Sameshima Y, Okamoto K: A case of common duct carcinoma with sarcoid reaction in the regional lymph nodes. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg. 1982, 15: 512-515. 10.5833/jjgs.15.512.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Schmidt D, Harms D, Lang W: Primary malignant hepatic tumours in childhood. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1985, 407 (4): 387-405. 10.1007/BF00709986.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Steenbergen W, Fevery J, Vandenbrande P, Desmet V, Ponette E, Kerremans R, de Groote J: Ulcerative colitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, bile duct carcinoma, and generalized sarcoidosis. Report of a unique association. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1987, 9 (5): 574-579. 10.1097/00004836-198710000-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein M, Kaminsky P, Deibener J, Cocciale MP, Duc M: Sarcoid reactions in cystic duct carcinoma. Chest. 1994, 106 (4): 1304-1305. 10.1378/chest.106.4.1304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakao A, Sato Y, Nakashima A: A case of bile duct cancer with sarcoid reaction in the regional lymph nodes. Biliary Tract Pancreas. 1996, 17: 963-966.Google Scholar
  20. Shito M, Shintoku J, Miyazaki H: Primary caricnoma of the cystic duct associated with sarcoid reactions: report of a case. Surg Today. 1997, 27: 1177-1181. 10.1007/BF02385690.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Onitsuka A, Katagiri Y, Kiyama S, Mimoto H, Nakamura T, Toda K, Shima H: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma associated with sarcoid reaction in the regional lymph nodes. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003, 10 (4): 316-320. 10.1007/s00534-002-0817-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mao JT, Fisnbein MC: Metastatic pancreatic cancer masquerading as pulmonary sarcoidosis. Am J Med. 2000, 109 (7): 598-599. 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00537-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kurata A, Terado Y, Schulz A, Fujioka Y, Franke FE: Inflammatory cells in the formation of tumor-related sarcoid reactions. Hum Pathol. 2005, 36 (5): 546-554. 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.02.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mastroroberto M, Berardi S, Fraticelli L, Pianta P, Ercolani G, Cancellieri A, Sama C: Sarcoidosis and sarcoid-like reaction associated with pancreatic malignancy: are you able to read a riddle?. JOP. 2012, 13 (4): 454-457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Carriaga MT, Henson DE: Liver, gallbladder, extrahepatic bile ducts, and pancreas. Cancer. 1995, 75 (1 Suppl): 171-190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Foster JM, Hoshi H, Gibbs JF, Iyer R, Javle M, Chu Q, Kuvshinoff B: Gallbladder cancer: defining the indications for primary radical resection and radical re-resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007, 14 (2): 833-840. 10.1245/s10434-006-9097-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kondo S, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Uesaka K: Regional and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in radical surgery for advanced gallbladder carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2000, 87 (4): 418-422. 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01384.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Durkalski V, Eloubeidi MA, Etamad R, Matsuda K, Lewin D, Van Velse A, Hennesey W, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ: Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001, 54 (4): 441-447. 10.1067/mge.2001.117764.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams DB, Sahai AV, Aabakken L, Penman ID, van Velse A, Webb J, Wilson M, Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience. Gut. 1999, 44 (5): 720-726. 10.1136/gut.44.5.720.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunsaker AR, Munden RF, Pugatch RD, Mentzer SJ: Sarcoidlike reaction in patients with malignancy. Radiology. 1996, 200 (1): 255-261. 10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657922.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Banchereau J, Steinman RM: Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998, 392 (6673): 245-252. 10.1038/32588.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, Gimotty PA, Massobrio M, Regnani G, Makrigiannakis A, Gray H, Schlienger K, Liebman MN, Rubin SC, Coukos G: Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348 (3): 203-213. 10.1056/NEJMoa020177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsujitani S, Kakeji Y, Watanabe A, Kohnoe S, Maehara Y, Sugimaghi K: Infiltration of S-100 protein positive dendritic cells and peritoneal recurrence in advanced gastric cancer. Int Surg. 1992, 77 (4): 238-241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Iwamoto M, Shinohara H, Miyamoto A, Okuzawa M, Mabuchi H, Nohara T, Gon G, Toyoda M, Tanigawa N: Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells expressing CD83 in human breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2003, 104 (1): 92-97. 10.1002/ijc.10915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ishigami S, Aikou T, Natsugoe S, Hokita S, Iwashige H, Tokushige M, Sonoda S: Prognostic value of HLA-DR expression and dendritic cell infiltration in gastric cancer. Oncology. 1998, 55 (1): 65-69. 10.1159/000011837.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Inoue K, Furihata M, Ohtsuki Y, Fujita Y: Distribution of S-100 protein-positive dendritic cells and expression of HLA-DR antigen in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder in relation to tumour progression and prognosis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1993, 422 (5): 351-355. 10.1007/BF01605452.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Yamamoto T, Tateishi H, Nishimura Y, Watanabe M, Ukyo S, Miyake T, Uchino H, Matsumoto Y, Ishii K, Takahashi K: A study of gastric cancer with sarcoid reaction as observed in the regional lymph node. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1980, 77 (10): 1555-1561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/946/prepub

Copyright

© Kawasaki et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement