Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Cancer

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A randomized phase II clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin compared with gemcitabine and carboplatin as first-line therapy in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of lung

  • Jin-Ji Yang1,
  • Cheng Huang2,
  • Gong-Yan Chen3,
  • Yong Song4,
  • Ying Cheng5,
  • Hong-Hong Yan1,
  • Qing Zhou1 and
  • Yi-Long Wu1Email author
BMC Cancer201414:684

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-684

Received: 20 May 2013

Accepted: 17 September 2014

Published: 20 September 2014

Abstract

Background

Recent advances have shown that histology and genetic biomarkers are important in patient selection, which have led to significantly better outcomes for lung cancer patients. However, most new treatments only apply to adenocarcinoma or non-squamous, and in squamous carcinoma there is little breakthrough. In a phase III trial nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin showed superior response rate over paclitaxel and carboplatin. In subgroup analysis the squamous histology appeared to be a predictive factor to nab-paclitaxel treatment.

Methods/Design

This is an open-label, randomized, active controlled phase II trial. A total of 120 untreated advanced squamous lung cancer patients are randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive nab-paclitaxel (135 mg/m2, d1, 8, q3w) plus carboplatin (AUC 5, d1, q3w) or gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m2, d1, 8, q3w) and carboplatin (AUC 5, d1, q3w). The primary endpoint is objective response rate and the second endpoints are progression free survival, overall survival, safety and biomarkers associated with nab-paclitaxel. The treatment will continue up to six cycles or intolerable toxicity.

Discussion

This ongoing trial will be the first prospective randomized trial to explore the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel as the first-line treatment specifically in squamous carcinoma of lung.

Study number

CTONG1002

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov reference: NCT01236716

Keywords

Nab-paclitaxelCarboplatinGemcitabineSquamousCarcinomaLung

Background

For both men and women, lung cancer is the leading cause of death and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents more than 80% of all lung cancer cases [1]. Compared with best supportive care, platinum-based doublet chemotherapy not only prolongs the survival, but also improves symptom control and the quality of life. It has been the standard of care for advanced NSCLC [2]. Available data suggest that different platinum/third generation chemotherapy agent combinations have similar efficacy in the first line setting [3].

Traditionally, the choice of chemotherapy is based on performance status, age, etc, and histology has not influenced the treatment options. Recent years, personalized treatment has developed rapidly with the emerging of new chemotherapy agents and targeted therapies. Pemetrexed has favorable efficacy and safety profiles in non-squamous NSCLC but not in squamous population [4]. The benefit of bevacizumab is also limited to the non-squamous subtypes [5]. Moreover, most targeted drugs need molecular markers to distinguish patients who would likely to gain survival advantage from treatment, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) [6, 7], EGFR amplification for cetuximab [8] and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion-positive for ALK inhibitor crizotinib [9]. Molecular-targeted drugs have the advantages of prominent therapeutic efficacy and moderate adverse reactions, prolonging patients’ survival time and improving the quality of life at the same time. EGFR-TKIs such as erlotinib and gefitinib have been recommended as the first -line treatment in EGFR mutation patients by clinical practice guidelines [2].

Despite all the progress in adenocarcinoma and biomarker positive patients, the treatment breakthroughs for squamous histology are few. Although the EGFR mutated squamous lung cancer patients can be treated with EGFR-TKIs as well, the mutation rate in this population is much lower than that in the non-squamous subtypes (around 10% in Caucasian adenocarcinoma patients, 30% in Asian adenocarcinoma patients, but only around 3% in squamous patients [10]). Thus major part of squamous patients remains on platinum-based doublet with an average objective response rate (ORR) around 20% and overall survival (OS) no longer than 12 months.

Nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) is a nano-technology developed albumin bound paclitaxel. With the natural affinity of albumin to tumor cells, it enables paclitaxel to be concentrated in cancer lesion to exert bigger anti-neoplastic effect. In a phase III trial of Abraxane plus carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel [11], Abraxane arm shows significantly higher ORR than the solvent-based paclitaxel arm (33% vs 25%, p = 0.005) and equivalent progression free survival (PFS) and OS. The ORR benefit is especially bigger in squamous subtype (41% vs 24%, p < 0.001) and the OS beneficial trend is bigger in this group too.

With these promising findings of subtype analysis in the phase III trial, this trial is designed to prospectively explore the efficacy of Abraxane specifically in the squamous population by a head to head comparison to current standard of care.

Methods/Design

This study is a multicenter, randomized, active controlled, open label phase II clinical trial. The objective is to study the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin compared with gemcitabine and carboplatin as first-line therapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of lung. All patients in this study have locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of lung which has been histologically confirmed. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized in Table 1. This study was approved by the ethics committees of Guangdong General Hospital, Fujian Province Cancer Hospital, Heilongjiang Province Cancer Hospital, Nanjing General Hospital and Jilin Province Cancer Hospital respectively.Recruitment for this study is currently ongoing in 5 sites in China. Written informed consent must be provided by all patients before any trial-related procedures are carried out. 120 patients are randomly assigned to treatment group A: receiving nab-paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, d1, 8 and carboplatin AUC 5, d1 every three weeks; or group B: receiving gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2, plus carboplatin AUC 5, d1 every three weeks. Both group A and B receive up to six cycles of chemotherapy.
Table 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

• Previously untreated, histologically documented stage IIIB to stage IV or stage IIIA that is not amenable to regional therapy (7th Edition of TNM Staging Criteria) squamous cell carcinoma of lung. Previously untreated, histologically documented squamous cell carcinoma of lung with stage IV or locally advanced disease that is not amenable to radical regional therapy (7th Edition of TNM Staging Criteria).

• At least one measurable tumor lesion as defined by RECIST criteria.

• 18 to 85 years of age.

• ECOG performance status 0-1.

• Patients have no previously malignant tumors or history except cured cervical carcinoma in situ, basal cell carcinoma or superficial bladder cancer (Ta, Tis or T1).

• Patients should not have been treated with chemotherapy such as gemcitabine, platinum and taxane. But patients who have received chemotherapy for neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment at least 12 months before the study treatment are eligible.

• Patients’ blood test must meet the following requirements:

o ANC ≥ 1.5 x 109/L

o Platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L

o Hb ≥ 90 g/L (9 g/dL)

• Patients’ clinical biochemistry examination must meet the following requirements:

o ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) without liver metastasis, ALT and AST ≤ 5 x ULN with liver metastases

o Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN

o Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN

• Urine pregnancy test is negative for women, within 14 days before study treatment.

• Estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months.

• Patients will comply with the clinical trial protocol.

• Patients voluntarily participate in clinical trial and the informed consent must be signed.

Exclusion criteria

• Patients who are currently undergoing other anti-tumor therapies.

• Patients who were enrolled into any other clinical trial within 4 weeks of study entry.

• Any clinical laboratory findings give reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of any study medication or render the subject at high risk from treatment.

• Primary brain tumor or central nervous system metastatic tumor.

• Serious mental disorder.

• Serious dysgnosia or cognitive dysfunction.

• Other serious comorbidities.

• Alcohol or drug dependence.

• Previously allergic to drugs used in the study.

 

• Patients who are deemed unsuitable to participate in the study

Study objectives

The primary objective of this study is to compare the ORR of Abraxane plus carboplatin to gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Secondary objectives include PFS, OS, safety and biomarker parameters. Exploratory endpoints include expression of secreted protein acid rich in cysteine (SPARC) and caveolin-1 in NSCLC tissue and their predictive value in PFS and OS. Tumor samples will be collected from all randomized patients and tested in the central lab of Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences.

Statistics

The sample size calculation assumes that in advanced squamous lung cancer, Abraxane + carboplatin has an ORR of 40% [11] while gemcitabine + carboplatin has an ORR of 19% [3]. With inequality test using ratios of two independent proportions, the sample size is 120 patients in total, which will be randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio between two treatment arms (60 in each). This sample size will provide 80% power with two-sided type I error of 0.05 to reject the primary efficacy null hypothesis that Abraxane + carboplatin/gemcitabine + carboplatin hazard ratio for ORR is equal to 1.0.

The primary objective will be analyzed by chi-square test. Secondary endpoints of PFS and OS will be evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method with a 95% confidence interval. The log-rank method will be used to compare the difference between the survival curves of two arms. Multifactorial Cox regression analysis will be used to determine the prognostic factors of the survivals including PFS and OS.

Ethical considerations

Prior to initiation of the study, each of the participating sites must obtain local or central ethics committee approval from the appropriate body. All research will conform to the Declaration of Helsinki, as well as local legal and ethical requirements.

Discussion

Previous researches have shown comparable efficacy and good safety profile of Abraxane-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, compared to other standard platinum-based doublets. In a phase III trial, the ORR of Abraxane plus carboplatin is significantly higher than solvent-based paclitaxel and the survival time is equivalent in two groups [11]. The most common adverse events of interest in Abraxane arm are hematological toxicity and neuropathy. The incidence of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and anemia are higher in Abraxane group than solvent-based paclitaxel arm, while the incidence of neutropenia is higher in solvent-based paclitaxel arm. Generally, the majority of hematological toxicities in both arms are Grade 1-2 and manageable. Grade 3-4 sensory neuropathy occurred more frequently in solvent-based paclitaxel arm than Abraxane arm (12% vs 3%) and the median time to improvement of Grade 3-4 neuropathy to Grade 1 is much less for Abraxane arm than solvent-based paclitaxel arm (38 days vs 104 days). Thus Abraxane seems an optimal choice of third generation chemotherapy agents to be combined with platinum as the standard treatment due to its high activity and favorable safety profile.

Moreover, retrospective subgroup analyses showed that in squamous histology group, there were more significant ORR benefit and OS improvement trend. Squamous cell carcinoma consists approximately 30% of all NSCLC but new treatment options are few. There is huge unmet medical need to increase the prognosis of this patient population. Abraxane has the active agent of paclitaxel, which is an approved agent for treatment of squamous cell lung cancer, as well as the albumin-bound property which increases the drug distribution and concentration to a new level. Furthermore, studies have showed that SPARC is an albumin-bound protein that is rich in tumor matrix and may plays an important role in absorbing Abraxane into the tumor site [12]. SPARC may serve as a predictive or prognostic biomarker of Abraxane-based therapy. Thus Abraxane has the potential to be the optimal treatment choice in squamous carcinoma of lung to achieve better response and survival.

This trial will be the first study to prospectively compare Abraxane-based regimen with a currently standard treatment for squamous histology patients. A total of 120 patients will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive Abraxane 135 mg/m2, d1,8 plus carboplatin AUC 5, d1, or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 5, d1, both in a cycle of three weeks and up to six cycles. The choice of Abraxane dosage and schedule is based on previous researches and the phase III trial result. Weekly Abraxane has been proved to have better efficacy and safety than every three week schedule [13]. Compared to 100 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15 in a four-week cycle in the phase III trial, we implement a modified 135 mg/m2 , d1, 8 in a three-week cycle schedule to ensure a similar dose intensity but more timely treatment break in order to further reduce toxicity.

This study, together with findings from other phase I/II/III studies of Abraxane in NSCLC, will provide valuable insight to the role of Abraxane in the optimal treatment choice for squamous carcinoma of lung.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This trial is supported by Celgene Corporation. The authors take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
(2)
Fujian Province Cancer Hospital
(3)
Heilongjiang Province Cancer Hospital
(4)
Nanjing General Hospital
(5)
Jilin Province Cancer Hospital

References

  1. National Office for Cancer Prevention and Control & National Central Cancer Registry, Disease Prevention and Control Bureau, Ministry of Health: Chinese Cancer Registry Annual Report 2010: Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Chinese Cancer Registration Areas in 2007. 2011, No. 27 Taiping Road Haidian District, Beijing, China (Postcode: 100850): Military Medical Science Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Fort Washington, PA: NCCN; 2011. Ver. 2.2012. [http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf]
  3. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J, Johnson DH, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 92-98. 10.1056/NEJMoa011954.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, Biesma B, Vansteenkiste J, Manegold C, Serwatowski P, Gatzemeier U, Digumarti R, Zukin M, Lee JS, Mellemgaard A, Park K, Patil S, Rolski J, Goksel T, de Marinis F, Simms L, Sugarman KP, Gandara D: Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 3543-3551. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, Lilenbaum R, Johnson DH: Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 2542-2550. 10.1056/NEJMoa061884.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y, Nishiwaki Y, Ohe Y, Yang JJ, Chewaskulyong B, Jiang H, Duffield EL, Watkins CL, Armour AA, Fukuoka M: Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 947-957. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, Palmero R, Garcia-Gomez R, Pallares C, Sanchez JM, Porta R, Cobo M, Garrido P, Longo F, Moran T, Insa A, De Marinis F, Corre R, Bover I, Illiano A, Dansin E, de Castro J, Milella M, Reguart N, Altavilla G, Jimenez U, Provencio M, Moreno MA, Terrasa J, Muñoz-Langa J, et al: Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicenter, open-label, ransomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13 (3): 239-246. 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70393-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Vynnychenko I, Park K, Yu CT, Ganul V, Roh JK, Bajetta E, O'Byrne K, de Marinis F, Eberhardt W, Goddemeier T, Emig M, Gatzemeier U, FLEX Study Team: Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomized phase III trial. Lancet. 2009, 373: 1525-1531. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60569-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kwak EL, Bang YJ, Camdge DR, Shaw AT, Solomon B, Maki RG, Ou SH, Dezube BJ, Jänne PA, Costa DB, Varella-Garcia M, Kim WH, Lynch TJ, Fidias P, Stubbs H, Engelman JA, Sequist LV, Tan W, Gandhi L, Mino-Kenudson M, Wei GC, Shreeve SM, Ratain MJ, Settleman J, Christensen JG, Haber DA, Wilner K, Salgia R, Shapiro GI, Clark JW, et al: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010, 363: 1693-1703. 10.1056/NEJMoa1006448.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Forbes SA, Bharma G, Bamford S, Dawson E, Kok C, Clements J, Menzies A, Teague JW, Futreal PA: The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer (COSMICS). Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2008, 4: 1-32. chapter 10: unit 10.11Google Scholar
  11. Socinski MA, Bondarenko I, Karaseva NA, Makhson AM, Vynnychenko I, Okamoto I, Hon JK, Hirsh V, Bhar P, Zhang H, Iglesias JL, Renschler MF: Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012, 30: 2055-2062. 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5848.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Brekken R, Sivridis E, Gatter KC, Harris AL, Sage EH: Enhanced expression of SPARC/osteonectin in the tumor-associated stroma of non-small cell lung cancer is correlated with markers of hyposia/acidity and with poor prognosis of patients. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 5376-5380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Socinski MA, Manikhas GM, Stroyakovsky DL, Makhson AN, Cheporov SV, Orlov SV, Yablonsky PK, Bhar P, Iglesias J: A dose finding study of weekly and every-3-week nab-paclitaxel followed by carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2010, 5: 852-861. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d5e39e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/684/prepub

Copyright

© Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement