Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Increased serum sTRAIL levels were correlated with survival in bevacizumab-treated metastatic colon cancer

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
BMC Cancer201212:58

  • Received: 10 May 2011
  • Accepted: 7 February 2012
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody developed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for the treatment of metastatic cancer. The parameters of RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors) are not adequate to detect important treatment effects and response. Our goal was to evaluate the possibility of using sTRAIL (serum-soluble TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) and VEGF as markers of treatment efficacy and prognosis in patients with metastatic colon cancer.


sTRAIL and VEGF levels were measured by ELISA in the sera of 16 bevacizumab-treated metastatic colon cancer patients and 10 presumably healthy age-matched controls. The measurements were taken before and after treatment for comparison purposes.


Elevated levels of sTRAIL were found in seven out of 16 patients after bevacizumab treatment. Although these patients had a median survival time of 20.6 months, the remaining bevacizumab-treated patients who did not show an increase in sTRAIL had a median survival time of 9.4 months. As expected, serum VEGF levels were decreased in all patients who received bevacizumab therapy and showed no correlation between serum VEGF levels and patient survival (data not shown).


Serum sTRAIL levels might be a useful predictor of prognosis in metastatic colon cancer, in the early evaluation stages following bevacizumab treatment.


  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
  • Bevacizumab
  • MCRC Patient
  • Bevacizumab Treatment
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Concentration


Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death [1]. Overall, the 5-year survival rate is <10% for stage IV cancer [2]. The cure rate with surgery alone is very low and chemotherapy and radiotherapy are usually needed in patients with untreated metastatic colon cancer. The development of colorectal cancer is characterized by a sequence of events during which normal colonic epithelium gradually transforms to carcinoma tissue, in most cases, via the development of colorectal adenomas [3]. This sequence of events is driven by an accumulation of molecular (epi)genetic alterations causing progressive disorders in cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis [4, 5]. Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, plays an important role in the development and maintenance of tissue homeostasis but also represents an effective mechanism by which abnormal cells, such as tumor cells, can be eliminated [68]. Abnormalities in apoptotic function or resistance to apoptosis have been identified as important events in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer and its resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and radiotherapy [9, 10].

In recent years, bevacizumab, a novel humanized monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has found widespread clinical use as an angiogenesis inhibitor for certain types of metastatic cancers [11]. Treatment with bevacizumab with/without the combination of other chemotherapeutic agents inhibits VEGF receptor activation and vascular permeability, which eventually lead to tumor cell apoptosis [12, 13]. Apoptosis can be induced passively, through the lack of essential survival signals, or actively, through the ligand-induced trimerization of specific death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family, such as Fas, the TNF receptor, or TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) receptor [14].

TRAIL (APO-2 ligand) is a transmembrane (type II) glycoprotein that also belongs to the TNF superfamily. The extracellular domain of TRAIL is homologous to that of other family members and shows a homotrimeric subunit structure. Like TNF and Fas ligand (FASL), TRAIL also exists physiologically in a biologically active soluble homotrimeric form, serum-soluble TRAIL; sTRAIL [15]. Several recent studies have indicated that sTRAIL is involved in the pathophysiology of different disease states such as cancer, viral infections, autoimmune diseases and inflammation, and defective apoptosis due to its interaction with its ligand preventing signaling for apoptosis may contribute to these diseases [1621].

Several studies have shown that both the membrane-bound TRAIL and sTRAIL can induce apoptosis in a wide variety of tumor types by activating death receptors [2224]. sTRAIL is also used as a positive marker for apoptosis [25]. However, it has been observed that the cytotoxic effects of antiangiogenic agents are increased in clinical phase II and III studies when these agents are combined with TRAIL-related therapies [2628]. Another study with human glioblastoma cells has indicated that TRAIL inhibits angiogenesis stimulated by VEGF expression [29].

However, recently used RECIST parameters (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors; responders vs. non-responders) are not adequate to document the differences in treatment response [30]. Therefore, there is a need for a sensitive, specific and reliable serum marker to monitor the therapeutic response.

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the possible use of sTRAIL as a marker for bevacizumab treatment efficacy at the cell apoptosis-linked step.


The amount of released sTRAIL and VEGF was measured by ELISA in the serum of 16 metastatic colon cancer patients with liver metastases, who also received bevacizumab therapy, and 10 age- and sex-matched healthy control individuals who did not receive the treatment. Serum samples were obtained before bevacizumab-based chemotherapy regimens and 3 months after. Serum samples were kept between 2 and 8°C, centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, and then frozen at -81°C until assayed.

ELISA was done using the Diaclone sTRAIL ELISA kit (Gen-Probe, Besancon, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Group comparisons were made using the independent samples t test. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the period from the beginning of chemotherapy until documented progression or death from any cause. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period from the first day of treatment until the date of last follow-up or death.

Written informed consent relating to the Declaration of Helsinki was obtained from all patients. The study was approved by Akdeniz University Local Committee on Ethics.


The baseline clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. The serum sTRAIL concentrations before therapy were similar to those of the controls (Figure 1). Serum sTRAIL levels in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients before bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and healthy controls were 1.12 ± 0.04 ng/ml and 1.17 ± 0.08 ng/ml, respectively. After bevacizumab treatment, seven out of 16 patients' post-treatment sTRAIL ratios were significantly increased as shown in Figure 2.
Table 1

Colon cancer patients versus healthy individuals.


Healthy Controls

(n = 10)

Colon Ca patients

(n = 16)


51, 8

55, 18



8 (%80)






Age and sex distribution of metastatic colon cancer patients (n = 16) and healthy control individuals (n = 10)

Figure 1
Figure 1

Serum sTRAIL levels. No difference between two groups (P = 0.50) before bevacizumab treatment: 1.12 ± 0.04 ng/ml in metastatic colon cancer patients and 1.17 ± 0.08 ng/ml in healthy control individuals.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Serum sTRAIL levels after treatment. Elevated levels of sTRAIL were found in seven out of 16 metastatic colon cancer patients whose serum sTRAIL concentrations were similar to those of healthy age- and sex-matched control individuals (n = 10) before bevacizumab therapy, as seen in Figure 1. These increases were significant compared with pretreatment measurements (P < 0.001). The increase or decrease in the serum levels were shown as percentage change in serum sTRAIL.

Nine patients had progressive diseases, resulting in an overall response rate (56.2%). Median overall survival was 9.4 ± 0.9 months in non-responders. Interestingly, these nine patients were the same ones who showed no increase in sTRAIL levels after bevacizumab treatment. Therefore, we wanted to know whether there was any correlation between sTRAIL levels and overall survival rates. Our study demonstrated that elevated sTRAIL levels after bevacizumab treatment were significantly associated with increased median overall survival of up to 20.6 months (Table 2).
Table 2

Change in serum sTRAIL levels and association with survival.

Response Status



Serum sTRAIL Level (ng/ml)

Alive (n = 7)

20,6 ± 0,5

1,38 ± 0,10

Dead (n = 9)

9,4 ± 0,9

0,92 ± 0,05

Statistical analysis (unpaired


p < 0,05 (p = 0,0001)

p < 0,05 (p = 0,0002)

Metastatic colon cancer patients who were treated with bevacizumab, and had increased levels of serum sTRAIL after treatment, had an extended median survival time up to 20.6 months. In contrast, median survival was 9.4 months for patients with decreased or unchanged sTRAIL after the bevacizumab therapy

Not surprisingly, the serum VEGF levels were decreased in all patients who received bevacizumab therapy (data not shown). Serum VEGF levels in MCRC patients before bevacizumab-based chemotherapy were 211 ± 189 ng/ml, and 3 months after treatment, they decreased to 117 ± 18.9 ng/ml, similar to healthy controls (119.5 ± 35.1 ng/ml).

Discussion and conclusions

MCRC is mainly treated with combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The role of TRAIL and another apoptotic marker FAS/FASL systems in CRC patients treated with chemotherapeutic agents has been discussed previously [3133]. The use of sTRAIL is a novel concept for which few data exist. We evaluated sTRAIL ratio as a marker of chemotherapeutic responsiveness in MCRC patients. This is believed to be the first study in which changes in levels of sTRAIL after bevacizumab treatment have been estimated in overall survival of MCRC patients.

In this study, we compare the levels of sTRAIL in responders versus non-responders to bevacizumab therapy. In responding patients, sTRAIL level increased, but the level decreased or was unchanged in non-responders. This significant change may be a result of the effect of bevacizumab on cancer cells via apoptosis. Another study has found that, although there was no significant difference between sTRAIL, soluble death receptor (sDR)4 and sDR5 levels in MCRC patients before and after treatment, significant correlations were observed between post-treatment sFASL and sDR4, post-treatment sFAS and sTRAIL, post-treatment sTRAIL and sFAS/sFASL ratio, and post-treatment sFASL and sDR5 [34]. This controversy may also have been due to the patients enrolled in the study. Although we chose newly diagnosed patients who had bevacizumab as first-line treatment, in the other study, patients were mostly treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in the second-line setting after failure of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

There have been many studies that have focused on identifying biomarkers for prediction of bevacizumab efficacy. The most obvious protein biomarker to select for testing bevacizumab efficacy is VEGF, but no studies have yet found changes in VEGF concentrations during therapy to have consistent predictive value [35]. One study has found that circulating levels of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 to be at least potentially predictive of survival benefit. Other studies have suggested that neutropenia might have a negative effect on bevacizumab efficacy. There have also been other studies that have concluded that polymorphisms in the VEGF pathway may have predictive value [36, 37]. However, although several candidate biomarkers have already been described, including tumor and plasma VEGF, circulating E-selectin, ICAM-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, much more work is needed to determine the most effective biomarkers and thus to select the patients that are most likely to benefit from bevacizumab therapy [36].

As a conclusion, our study gave a different perspective on MCRC and bevacizumab treatment efficacy in relation to apoptosis and serum sTRAIL levels. The present data highlight the potential importance of sTRAIL in this setting. Further study with a larger patient population and longer duration is warranted to clarify its value.


This study was supported by the Akdeniz University Scientific Research Project Administration Division and Health Science Institute.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Medical Genetics, Human Gene and Cell Therapy Center of Akdeniz University Hospitals and Clinics, Antalya, Turkey
Department of Medical Oncology, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Antalya Education and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey


  1. Valentini V, Coco C, Gambacorta MA, Barba MC, Meldolesi E: Evidence and research perspectives for surgeons in the European Rectal Cancer Consensus Conference (EURECA-CC2). Acta Chir Iugosl. 2010, 57 (3): 9-16. 10.2298/ACI1003009V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Palmer G, Holm T: Survival in locally advanced rectal cancer can be improved. Optimal management with centralized investigation and treatment. Lakartidningen. 2010, 107 (35): 2014-2017. ReviewPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jass JR, Whitehall VL, Young J, et al: Emerging concepts in colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2002, 123: 862-876. 10.1053/gast.2002.35392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Giardiello FM, Hamilton SR, Krush AJ, et al: Treatment of colonic and rectal adenomas with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 1993, 328: 1313-1316. 10.1056/NEJM199305063281805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nugent KP, Farmer KC, Spigelman AD, et al: Randomized controlled trial of the effect of sulindac on duodenal and rectal polyposis and cell proliferation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 1993, 80: 1618-1619. 10.1002/bjs.1800801244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Winde G, Schmid KW, Brandt B, et al: Clinical and genomic influence of sulindac on rectal mucosa in familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997, 40: 1156-1168. 10.1007/BF02055161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Steinbach G, Lynch PM, Phillips RK, et al: The effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 1946-1952. 10.1056/NEJM200006293422603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashkenazi A, Dixit VM: Apoptosis control by death and decoy receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999, 11: 255-2601. 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)80034-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rijcken FE, Hollema H, van der Sluis T, Boersma-van Ek W, Kleibeuker JH: Sulindac increases epithelial cell proliferative activity in the proximal colon of HNPCC patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005, 17: A56-A57.Google Scholar
  10. Reed JC: Apoptosis-targeted therapies of cancer. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3: 17-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ranieri G, Patruno R, Ruggieri E, Montemurro S, Valerio P, Ribatti D: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a target of bevacizumab in cancer: from the biology to the clinic. Curr Med Chem. 2006, 13 (16): 1845-1857. 10.2174/092986706777585059.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Puthillath A, Patel A, Fakih MG: Targeted therapies in the management of colorectal carcinoma: role of bevacizumab. Onco Targets Ther. 2009, 2: 1-15.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenab-Wolcott J, Giantonio BJ: Bevacizumab: current indications and future development for management of solid tumors. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009, 9 (4): 507-517. 10.1517/14712590902817817.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Opferman JT, Korsmeyer SJ: Apoptosis in the development and maintenance of the immune system. Nat Immunol. 2003, 4 (5): 410-415. 10.1038/ni0503-410. ReviewView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Holland PM: Targeting Apo2L/TRAIL receptors by soluble Apo2L/TRAIL. Cancer Lett. 2011, [Epub ahead of print] 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.11.001Google Scholar
  16. Wandinger KP, Lünemann JD, Wengert O, Bellmann-Strobl J, Aktas O, Weber A, Grundström E, Ehrlich S, Wernecke KD, Volk HD, Zipp F: TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) as a potential response marker for interferon-beta treatment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2003, 361 (9374): 2036-2043. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13641-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Han LH, Sun WS, Ma CH, Zhang LN, Liu SX, Zhang Q, Gao LF, Chen YH: Detection of soluble TRAIL in HBV infected patients and its clinical implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2002, 8 (6): 1077-1080.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Liabakk NB, Sundan A, Torp S, Aukrust P, Frøland SS, Espevik T: Development, characterization and use of monoclonal antibodies against sTRAIL: measurement of sTRAIL by ELISA. J Immunol Methods. 2002, 259 (1-2): 119-128. 10.1016/S0022-1759(01)00501-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lub-de Hooge MN, de Vries EG, de Jong S, Bijl M: Soluble TRAIL concentrations are raised in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005, 64 (6): 854-858. 10.1136/ard.2004.029058. Epub 2004 Nov 25View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bisgin A, Terzioglu E, Aydin C, Yoldas B, Yazisiz V, Balci N, Bagci H, Gorczynski RM, Akdis CA, Sanlioglu S: TRAIL death receptor-4, decoy receptor-1 and decoy receptor-2 expression on CD8+ T cells correlate with the disease severity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010, 11: 192-10.1186/1471-2474-11-192.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Aydin C, Sanlioglu AD, Bisgin A, Yoldas B, Dertsiz L, Karacay B, Griffith TS, Sanlioglu S: NF-κB targeting by way of IKK inhibition sensitizes lung cancer cells to adenovirus delivery of TRAIL. BMC Cancer. 2010, 10: 584-10.1186/1471-2407-10-584.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Shi J, Zheng D, Liu Y, Sham MH, Tam P, Farzaneh F, Xu R: Overexpression of soluble TRAIL induces apoptosis in human lung adenocarcinoma and inhibits growth of tumor xenografts in nude mice. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (5): 1687-92. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2749. Erratum in: Cancer Res. 2005 May 1;65(9):3966View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanlioglu AD, Dirice E, Elpek O, Korcum AF, Ozdogan M, Suleymanlar I, Balci MK, Griffith TS, Sanlioglu S: High TRAIL death receptor 4 and decoy receptor 2 expression correlates with significant cell death in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. Pancreas. 2009, 38 (2): 154-160. 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31818db9e3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koksal IT, Sanlioglu AD, Karacay B, Griffith TS, Sanlioglu S: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand-R4 decoy receptor expression is correlated with high Gleason scores, prostate-specific antigen recurrence, and decreased survival in patients with prostate carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2008, 26 (2): 158-165. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.01.022. Epub 2007 Nov 19View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Aukrust P, et al: J Infect Dis. 1994, 169: 420-424. 10.1093/infdis/169.2.420.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ding W, Cai T, Zhu H, Wu R, Tu C, Yang L, Lu W, He Q, Yang B: Synergistic antitumor effect of TRAIL in combination with sunitinib in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2010, 293: 158-166. 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.01.005. Epub 2010 Feb 6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ren B, Song K, Parangi S, Jin T, Ye M, Humphreys R, Duquette M, Zhang X, Benhaga N, Lawler J, Khosravi-Far R: A double hit to kill tumor and endothelial cells by TRAIL and antiangiogenic 3TSR. Cancer Res. 2009, 69 (9): 3856-3865. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2940. Epub 2009 Apr 14View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Plastaras JP, Kozak KR: A one, two punch for liver cancer: anti-angiogenesis with a death receptor agonist. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009, 8 (5): 463-464. Epub 2009 Mar 23View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cantarella G, Risuglia N, Dell'eva R, Lempereur L, Albini A, Pennisi G, Scoto GM, Noonan DN, Bernardini R: TRAIL inhibits angiogenesis stimulated by VEGF expression in human glioblastoma cells. Br J Cancer. 2006, 94 (10): 1428-1435. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603092.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Trillet-Lenoir V, et al: Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: accuracy of the RECIST criteria. Br J Radiol. 2002, 75 (899): 903-908.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nadal C, Maurel J, Gallego R, Castells A, Longarón R, Marmol M, Sanz S, Molina R, Martin-Richard M, Gascón P: FAS/FAS ligand ratio: a marker of oxaliplatin-based intrinsic and acquired resistance in advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 4770-4774. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. van Geelen CM, Westra JL, de Vries EG, Boersma-van Ek W, Zwart N, Hollema H, Boezen HM, Mulder NH, Plukker JT, de Jong S, Kleibeuker JH, Koornstra JJ: Prognostic significance of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and its receptors in adjuvantly treated stage III colon cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 4998-5004. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Granci V, Bibeau F, Kramar A, Boissière-Michot F, Thézénas S, Thirion A, Gongora C, Martineau P, Del Rio M, Ychou M: Prognostic significance of TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R3 expression in metastatic colorectal carcinomas. Eur J Cancer. 2008, 44: 2312-2318. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.06.042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yildiz R, Benekli M, Buyukberber S, Kaya AO, Ozturk B, Yaman E, Berk V, Coskun U, Yamac D, Sancak B, Uner A: The effect of bevacizumab on serum soluble FAS/FASL and TRAIL and its receptors (DR4 and DR5) in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010, 136 (10): 1471-1476. 10.1007/s00432-010-0803-1. Epub 2010 Feb 13View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jubb AM, Harris AH: Biomarkers to predict the clinical efficacy of bevacizumab in cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11: 1172-1183. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70232-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang SX: Bevacizumab and breast cancer: current therapeutic progress and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009, 9 (12): 1715-1725. 10.1586/era.09.153.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Beatty GL, Giantonio BJ: Bevacizumab and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008, 8 (5): 683-688. 10.1586/14737140.8.5.683.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Bisgin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.