Skip to main content
Download PDF

Immunohistochemical expression of mitochondrial membrane complexes (MMCs) I, III, IV and V in malignant and benign periampullary epithelium: a potential target for drug therapy of periampullary cancer?

BMC Cancer volume 10, Article number: 80 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mitochondrial membrane complexes (MMCs) are key mediators of cellular oxidative phosphorylation, and inhibiting them could lead to cell death. No published data are available on the relative abundance of MMCs in different periampullary cancers. Therefore, we studied the expression profile of MMCs I, III, IV and V in periampullary cancers, reactive pancreatitis, normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis.

Methods

This was a retrospective study on tissue microarrays constructed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from 126 consecutive patients (cancer = 104, chronic pancreatitis = 22) undergoing pancreatic resections between June 2001 and June 2006. 78 specimens of chronic pancreatitis tissue were obtained adjacent to areas of cancer. Normal pancreatic tissue was obtained from the resection specimens in a total of 30 patients. Metastatic tumours in 61 regional lymph nodes from 61 patients were also studied.

Results

MMCs I, III, IV and V were highly expressed (p < 0.05) in all primary periampullary cancers compared with metastatic lymph nodes and adjacent benign pancreas. MMCs III, IV and V were highly expressed in all cancers regardless of type compared with chronic pancreatitis (p < 0.05). Higher expression of MMCs I and V was associated with better survival and may, in part, relate to lower expression of these MMCs in poorly differentiated tumours compared with well and moderately differentiated tumours.

Conclusions

Differential expression of MMCs III, IV and V in primary periampullary cancers compared with adjacent benign periampullary tissue and chronic pancreatitis is a novel finding, which may render them attractive anticancer targets.

Peer Review reports

Background

The mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes or mitochondrial membrane complexes (MMCs) I, II, III and IV are proteins responsible for electron transport and the associated proton pumping which generates a proton gradient and mitochondrial membrane potential which is then used (via ATP synthase, complex V) to generate adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP), the central energy currency of the cell. Mitochondria also play a key role in apoptosis, through the modulation of membrane potential and the co-ordinated release of mitochondrial proteins such as cytochrome c [1]. Mitochondrial complexes have also been shown to be specific targets for drug therapy in cancer and drugs called "mitocans" [2–5] can disrupt the integrity of mitochondria causing cytosolic release of modulators of apoptosis and activation of mitochondria-dependent cell death signalling pathways inside cancer cells [6–8].

Although the concept of mitocans as novel anticancer agents is interesting, their safety and efficacy are dependent on their selectivity in targeting malignant tissue over normal tissue in inducing apoptosis [7, 9–11]. A key approach to targeting mitochondrial components involves blocking the electron transport chain by inhibiting MMCs I, II, III, IV and V [11, 12]. What is key to effecting some paradigms of mitochondrially-mediated apoptosis is the ability to induce a sufficiently large decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential, which may be made possible by inhibiting any one specific mitochondrial membrane.

Several classes of drugs are capable of achieving this in vitro [12–15], but before these agents are investigated clinically in specific cancers it is critical to ascertain the relative expression of these target membrane complexes in malignant tissue compared to benign tissue. Such a mechanistic approach would enable selection of mitocans that are target specific with least toxicity and optimal efficacy.

Periampullary cancer is a collective term used for cancers arising from or near the ampulla of Vater and include ampullary cancers, duodenal cancers, pancreatic head cancer and distal cholangiocarcinoma. As the relative expression of MMCs in malignant and benign pancreatic epithelium has not yet been characterized, we performed this study to determine the immunohistochemical expression of MMCs in tissue microarrays (TMAs) of formalin-fixed archived specimens of periampullary cancers (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, ampullary adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma and duodenal adenocarcinoma), chronic pancreatitis, and normal pancreatic tissue, and to determine any association of MMC expression in cancer with survival.

Methods

Study design, setting and ethics

This immunohistochemical study was performed on archived formalin-fixed pancreatic tissues from all patients who underwent pancreatic resections between June 2001 and June 2006 at Nottingham University Hospitals, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. The Ethics Committee of Nottingham University Hospitals approved the conduct of this study.

Subjects

We included 126 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic resections (104 for cancer and 22 for chronic pancreatitis) [16]. Additional specimens of chronic pancreatitis tissue were obtained from areas of inflammation adjacent to cancers. Normal pancreatic tissue was obtained from the resection specimens, adjacent to areas of cancer or chronic pancreatitis. Metastatic lymph nodes from patients with cancers were also studied.

Construction of tissue microarrays

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks containing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, ampullary adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, duodenal adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreatic tissue were identified on haematoxylin and eosin stained slides, marked by a single histopathologist (AMZ) and tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed in triplicate by a method previously used by us [16].

Immunohistochemical staining

Slides were deparaffinized in xylene, then hydrated via graded dilutions of alcohol followed by running tap water. Following a rinse in de-ionized water, the sections were pre-treated with boiling sodium citrate 10 mM pH 6.0 for 23 min to unmask antigenicity. Subsequently, a Labelled Streptavidin Biotin (LSAB) immunoperoxidase procedure was performed using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) as the chromogen on a TechMate 500+ automated stainer (Dako UK Ltd., Ely, UK). The staining protocol consisted of incubating the sections with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase, washing in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer, and incubation in goat serum for 20 min. After washing, the slides were incubated with mouse anti-mitochondrial, OXPHOS complexes I, III, IV and V antibodies (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) at an optimal dilution of 1:20, 1:20, 1:20 and 1:100, respectively, in an antibody diluent (S2022; Dako) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by further washing in PBS. Sections were then incubated with a biotin linked secondary antibody for 30 min followed by washing in PBS and then streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (30 min) using a reagent kit from Dako (K5001). Immunostaining was visualized using DAB present in the above kit for 10 min, followed by light counterstaining with haematoxylin. Negative controls were also performed on TMAs using diluent only. The control TMAs did not stain positively, confirming the positive staining observed using this protocol was that of MMCs I, III, IV and V. Liver sections were used as positive controls.

Immunohistochemical scoring

MMC expression was calculated by combining an estimate of the percentage of immunoreactive cells (quantity score) with an estimate of the staining intensity (staining intensity score) as follows: no staining was scored as 0, 1-10% of cells with positive staining were scored as 1, 10-50% as 2, 50-70% as 3, and 70-100% as 4. Staining intensity was rated on a scale of 0 to 3 as follows: 0 = negative (no colour); 1 = weak brown, 2 = moderate brown, and 3 = strong brown. The raw data were converted to the immunohistochemical score (IHS) by multiplying the quantity and staining intensity scores. Therefore, the score could range from 0 to 12. An IHS ≥ 2 was considered as positive expression [17]. Staining was further categorized as high (score >8) or low (score ≤ 8), based on the median staining score of 8 for all MMCs. Immunohistochemical scoring was performed independently by two observers (MMA and AMZ) and the inter-observer variability was <3%.

Proliferative capacity

Proliferative capacity of the cancers was evaluated using a well established method and represented as the volume corrected mitotic index (VCMI) [18]. This was also performed by 2 independent observers (MMA and AMZ) and the inter-observer variability was <3%.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v16.0 for Mac (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Means were compared using the Student t-test. One way ANOVA was used when comparing 3 or more groups. Results were considered significant at p < 0.05. Correlations were performed using Pearson's correlation test. Survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method with log rank Mantel Cox comparison.

Results

Of the 126 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic resections 104 (62 male) with a median (IQR) age of 64 (59-72) years had cancer and 22 (15 male) with a median (IQR) age of 55 (41-61) years had chronic pancreatitis. Specimens of chronic pancreatitis tissue were obtained from areas adjacent to cancer in 78 patients. Normal pancreatic tissue was obtained from the resection specimens, adjacent to areas of cancer or chronic pancreatitis in a total of 30 patients. Sixty-one metastatic lymph nodes from 61 patients were also studied [16]. Of the 104 patients with cancer, 31 (15 male) had ampullary adenocarcinoma, 24 (15 male) had cholangiocarcinoma, 44 (29 male) had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 5 (3 male) had duodenal adenocarcinoma. The ratios of well:moderately:poorly differentiated tumours were 7:16:8, 1:18:5, 5:28:11 and 0:5:0 for ampullary adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and duodenal adenocarcinoma respectively. Vascular invasion was present in 13 (42%), 8 (33%), 22 (50%) and 1 (20%) patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and duodenal adenocarcinoma respectively. Corresponding figures for perineural invasion were 12 (39%), 14 (58%), 30 (68%) and 2 (40%) and those for lymphatic invasion were 12 (39%), 14 (58%), 26 (59%) and 4 (80%). Tumours were ≥ 2 cm in diameter in 12 (39%), 7 (29%), 15 (34%) and 2 (40%) patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and duodenal adenocarcinoma respectively. AICC disease stage distribution (Ia:Ib:II) was 12 (39%):11 (35%):8 (26%) for those with ampullary adenocarcinoma, 7 (29%):7 (29%):10 (42%) for cholangiocarcinoma, 15 (34%):12 (27%):17 (39%) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 2 (40%):2 (40%):1 (20%) for duodenal adenocarcinoma.

MMC by grade of the tumour

The immunohistochemical scores for MMCs I, III, IV and V, categorized as high or low expressors by tumour grade for various periampullary tumour types, are summarized in Table 1. Across tumour grades the ratios of high to low expressors of MMCs I, III and IV were comparable. However, for MMC V the ratios were reversed for poorly differentiated tumours compared to well or moderately differentiated tumours, i.e. poorly differentiated tumours tended to show low expression of MMC V, compared to well and moderately differentiated tumours (Table 1). Moreover, high MMC V expression showed a statistically significant inverse correlation with the number of lymph node metastases (Pearson's correlation coefficient of -0.314, 2 tailed significance of p < 0.001). Volume corrected mitotic index (VCMI) showed an inverse correlation with enhanced MMC I expression (Pearson's correlation coefficient of -0.231, 2 tailed significance of p < 0.001).

Table 1 Distribution by immunoscore of mitochondrial membrane complexes (MMC) I, III, IV and V among all periampullary cancers.
Full size table

MMC expression by tissue type in the same tumour and by diagnosis

MMC I expression in cancer was not significantly higher than in benign tissue. A significantly greater expression of MMCs III, IV and V was noted in cancer cells compared with surrounding benign tissue (reactive pancreatitis or normal pancreas) (Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4). The pattern of expression is summarized in Figure 5. In contrast to differential expression within tissues of the same tumour, MMC expression across a range of periampullary cancer types showed an increased expression in all of them compared with chronic pancreatitis MMCs III, IV and V (Figure 6).

Figure 1
figure1

Expression of MMC I. (a and b) Normal pancreatic acini showing weak expression; (c) Chronic pancreatitis tissue showing weak acinar expression but no expression in the pancreatic duct (arrow); (d and e) Pancreatic cancer showing strong expression; (f) Metastatic cancer in lymph node showing strong expression (Magnification for all images ×40)

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

Expression of MMC III. (a) Strong expression in pancreatic cancer (×60); with weak expression in adjacent benign pancreatic duct epithelium (arrow); (b) Strong expression in pancreatic cancer (×40); (c) Chronic pancreatitis (×60) showing weak expression in the acini but no expression in the ductal epithelium (arrow); (d) Normal pancreas (×40) showing very weak expression.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure3

Expression of MMC IV. (a and b) Weak expression in benign pancreatic acini (×40); with no expression in the ductal epithelium (arrows); (c and d) Strong expression in pancreatic cancer (×40).

Full size image
Figure 4
figure4

Expression of MMC V. (a) Lack of expression in a benign pancreatic ductal epithelium (×80); (b-d) strong expression in pancreatic cancer (×80); (b and c) well differentiated adenocarcinoma (×80); (d) poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (×80).

Full size image
Figure 5
figure5

Expression of MMCs observed in various tissues within resection specimens. (a) Mean (SE) immunoscore across various tissue types in the same tumour specimen for MMC I; (b) Mean (SE) immunoscore across various tissue types in the same tumour specimen for MMC III; (c) Mean (SE) immunoscore across various tissue types in the same tumour specimen for MMC IV; (d) Mean (SE) immunoscore across various tissue types in the same tumour specimen for MMC V. All comparisons were made with the primary tumour (*p < 0.001, # not significant).

Full size image
Figure 6
figure6

Expression of MMCs across tumour types. (a) Mean (SE) immunoscore across different diagnoses for MMC III, cancers, chronic pancreatitis; (b) Mean (SE) immunoscore across different diagnoses for MMC IV; cancers (5.4-7.0, 95% CI), chronic pancreatitis; (c) Mean (SE) immunoscore across different diagnoses for MMC V; cancers, chronic pancreatitis. Comparisons of each tumour type made with chronic pancreatitis were significant at p < 0.001).

Full size image

There was a tendency to better survival in patients who showed high expression of MMC I in their cancer compared with those who had no or low expression of MMC I, although this did not reach statistical significance (Kaplan Meier, Mantel Cox p = 0.08). However, higher expression of MMC V in the cancer, was associated with better survival (Kaplan Meier, Mantel Cox p = 0.005). This may, in part, relate to lower expression of these MMCs in poorly differentiated tumours compared to well and moderately differentiated tumours (Table 1, Figure 7). In addition, high expression of MMC V showed inverse correlation with lymph node metastases (r = -0.314, p < 0.001) and high VCMI (r = -0.231, p = 0.018).

Figure 7
figure7

Survival. (a) Disease specific survival of high versus low expressors of MMC I. A trend for better survival was observed in high expressors compared with low expressors (p = 0.08); (b) Disease specific survival of high versus low expressors of MMC V. High expressors survived significantly longer than low expressors (p = 0.005).

Full size image

Discussion

This study has shown that MMCs I, III, IV and V are highly expressed in periampullary cancers compared with metastatic cancer in lymph nodes or benign periampullary tissue for MMCs III, IV and V. MMC II expression was not studied because of non-availability of a suitable monoclonal antibody for immunostaining of formalin-fixed tissues. Normal ductal cells exhibit very low levels of staining, which may be to due to low levels of mitochondrial expression in these cells, and/or the limited sensitivity of the methods/antibodies used. This, to the best of our knowledge, is the first study demonstrating a differential expression of MMCs in malignant compared with benign periampullary tissue. In future studies, we will also correlate our data with the expression of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (Krebs' cycle) enzyme citrate synthase which has been used as a marker of mitochondrial mass and may allow detection of mitochondria in ductal cells due to its high level of expression in normal cells. Cancer cells are capable of withstanding an adverse microenvironment (hypoxia, acidosis, hypoglycaemia, and shortage of growth factors) by virtue of metabolic adaptation [19]. MMCs I and III, in addition to their role as proton carriers in the electron transport chain, are known to be crucial mediators for hypoxia induced reactive oxygen production [20–22]. Such a mechanism is crucial for cellular survival in adverse hypoxic conditions. Therefore, a differentially higher expression of MMCs in primary periampullary cancer, compared with metastatic lymph nodes or benign periampullary tissue may represent an adaptive mechanism to chronic cellular hypoxia.

Periampullary cancers carry a poor prognosis due to their insensitivity to most conventional therapies [23, 24]. Currently, surgical resection offers the only potential chance for a cure in these patients. The 5-year survival rate of all patients with pancreatic cancer is below 5%, and the median survival time after diagnosis is 6 months and only about 20% of patients who undergo curative resection survive longer than 5 years [25].

One mechanism of action of mitochondrial targeted anti-cancer drugs relies on their ability to disrupt the energy producing systems of cancer cell mitochondria, leading to increased reactive oxygen species and activation of the mitochondrial dependent cell death signaling pathways inside cancer cells. This emerging class of drugs called "mitocans" should act by altering properties of the mitochondria inside cancerous but not normal cells for instance by reducing the resting membrane potential by blocking the electron transport chain. It is clear from the present studies that mitocans offer great potential as effective and exciting new developments in cancer therapy, providing direct activation of cancer cell death by mitochondrial mediated apoptosis and that this complements the other pathways by which existing treatments kill cancer cells [2–5]. A proof of concept for MMC targeted therapy is the ability of clomipramine induced inhibition of MMC-III in cancer cells, as previous shown by our group [12]. Vitamin E analogues [4] have been shown to be an inhibitor of MMC II and tamoxifen, an inhibitor of MMC I [26].

Mitochondria-mediated anti-cancer therapy may also rely on manipulation of tumour suppressor proteins that are encoded by mitochondrial membrane complex genes. These genes include the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) encoder. SDH is part of the TCA cycle that connects glucose metabolism in the cytosol to oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria and is the only membrane-bound enzyme of the TCA cycle and is also a functional member (complex II) of the electron transport chain. Inherited or somatic mutations in SDH have been shown to lead to the development of phaeochromocytomas and paraganglionomas [27].

However, the clinical safety and efficacy of potential anti-mitochondrial therapies in periampullary tumours lies in the selective targeting of malignant epithelium with relative sparing of benign tissue. The prudent choice of a MMC targeting agent would depend on its differential expression between malignant and benign tissue.

Enhanced expression of MMCs III and V in tumours compared with chronic pancreatitis supports their mechanistic safety when administered to diagnostically uncertain pancreatic cancers, which may turn out to be chronic pancreatitis. Moreover, high expression of some of these MMCs (I and V) may be associated with better survival, by suppressing tumour biological factors like proliferative capacity and lymph node metastasis.

Conclusions

MMC III, IV and V targeting in periampullary cancers is mechanistically viable based on their characteristic expression profiles, indicating that such targeting strategies can be selective and therefore likely to be effective with minimal collateral damage to benign pancreatic tissue.

References

  1. 1.

    Newmeyer DD, Ferguson-Miller S: Mitochondria: releasing power for life and unleashing the machineries of death. Cell. 2003, 112: 481-490. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00116-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    D'Alessandro R, Roselli M, Ferroni P, Mariotti S, Spila A, Aloe S, Carone MD, Abbolito MR, Carlini S, Perri P, et al: Serum tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS): a complementary tumor marker to CA 15-3 in the management of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001, 68: 9-19. 10.1023/A:1017903724176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dias N, Bailly C: Drugs targeting mitochondrial functions to control tumor cell growth. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005, 70: 1-12. 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.03.021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Neuzil J, Dyason JC, Freeman R, Dong LF, Prochazka L, Wang XF, Scheffler I, Ralph SJ: Mitocans as anti-cancer agents targeting mitochondria: lessons from studies with vitamin E analogues, inhibitors of complex II. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2007, 39: 65-72. 10.1007/s10863-006-9060-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Neuzil J, Wang XF, Dong LF, Low P, Ralph SJ: Molecular mechanism of 'mitocan'-induced apoptosis in cancer cells epitomizes the multiple roles of reactive oxygen species and Bcl-2 family proteins. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580: 5125-5129. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.05.072.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Brenner C, Kroemer G: Apoptosis. Mitochondria--the death signal integrators. Science. 2000, 289: 1150-1151. 10.1126/science.289.5482.1150.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Galluzzi L, Larochette N, Zamzami N, Kroemer G: Mitochondria as therapeutic targets for cancer chemotherapy. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 4812-4830. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209598.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Green DR, Reed JC: Mitochondria and apoptosis. Science. 1998, 281: 1309-1312. 10.1126/science.281.5381.1309.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Don AS, Hogg PJ: Mitochondria as cancer drug targets. Trends Mol Med. 2004, 10: 372-378. 10.1016/j.molmed.2004.06.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fantin VR, Leder P: Mitochondriotoxic compounds for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 4787-4797. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209599.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Scatena R, Bottoni P, Botta G, Martorana GE, Giardina B: The role of mitochondria in pharmacotoxicology: a reevaluation of an old, newly emerging topic. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007, 293: C12-21. 10.1152/ajpcell.00314.2006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Daley E, Wilkie D, Loesch A, Hargreaves IP, Kendall DA, Pilkington GJ, Bates TE: Chlorimipramine: a novel anticancer agent with a mitochondrial target. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 328: 623-632. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.01.028.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Athanasiou A, Clarke AB, Turner AE, Kumaran NM, Vakilpour S, Smith PA, Bagiokou D, Bradshaw TD, Westwell AD, Fang L, et al: Cannabinoid receptor agonists are mitochondrial inhibitors: a unified hypothesis of how cannabinoids modulate mitochondrial function and induce cell death. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 364: 131-137. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.107.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Athanasiou A, Smith PA, Vakilpour S, Kumaran NM, Turner AE, Bagiokou D, Layfield R, Ray DE, Westwell AD, Alexander SP, et al: Vanilloid receptor agonists and antagonists are mitochondrial inhibitors: how vanilloids cause non-vanilloid receptor mediated cell death. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 354: 50-55. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.179.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dong LF, Freeman R, Liu J, Zobalova R, Marin-Hernandez A, Stantic M, Rohlena J, Valis K, Rodriguez-Enriquez S, Butcher B, et al: Suppression of tumor growth in vivo by the mitocan alpha-tocopheryl succinate requires respiratory complex II. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 1593-1600. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2439.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Aloysius MM, Zaitoun AM, Bates TE, Albasri A, Ilyas M, Rowlands BJ, Lobo DN: Complete absence of M2-pyruvate kinase expression in benign pancreatic ductal epithelium and pancreaticobiliary and duodenal neoplasia. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 327-10.1186/1471-2407-9-327.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Friedrichs K, Gluba S, Eidtmann H, Jonat W: Overexpression of p53 and prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer. 1993, 72: 3641-3647. 10.1002/1097-0142(19931215)72:12<3641::AID-CNCR2820721215>3.0.CO;2-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Imai Y, Sasaki T, Fujibayashi T: Volume-corrected mitotic index as a prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2001, 37: 72-76. 10.1016/S1368-8375(00)00061-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000, 100: 57-70. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Guzy RD, Hoyos B, Robin E, Chen H, Liu L, Mansfield KD, Simon MC, Hammerling U, Schumacker PT: Mitochondrial complex III is required for hypoxia-induced ROS production and cellular oxygen sensing. Cell Metab. 2005, 1: 401-408. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Guzy RD, Schumacker PT: Oxygen sensing by mitochondria at complex III: the paradox of increased reactive oxygen species during hypoxia. Exp Physiol. 2006, 91: 807-819. 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.033506.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Powell CS, Jackson RM: Mitochondrial complex I, aconitase, and succinate dehydrogenase during hypoxia-reoxygenation: modulation of enzyme activities by MnSOD. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003, 285: L189-198.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ghaneh P, Costello E, Neoptolemos JP: Biology and management of pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2007, 56: 1134-1152. 10.1136/gut.2006.113068.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Takhar AS, Palaniappan P, Dhingsa R, Lobo DN: Recent developments in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. BMJ. 2004, 329: 668-673. 10.1136/bmj.329.7467.668.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Schneider G, Siveke JT, Eckel F, Schmid RM: Pancreatic cancer: basic and clinical aspects. Gastroenterology. 2005, 128: 1606-1625. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cardoso CM, Custodio JB, Almeida LM, Moreno AJ: Mechanisms of the deleterious effects of tamoxifen on mitochondrial respiration rate and phosphorylation efficiency. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001, 176: 145-152. 10.1006/taap.2001.9265.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gottlieb E, Tomlinson IP: Mitochondrial tumour suppressors: a genetic and biochemical update. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005, 5: 857-866. 10.1038/nrc1737.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/80/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr Neil Hand from the Department of Molecular Pathology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Queen's Medical Centre for help with immunostaining. No external funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    Mark M Aloysius, Brian J Rowlands & Dileep N Lobo

  2. Department of Pathology, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    Abed M Zaitoun & Mohammad Ilyas

  3. New-Use Therapeutics Limited, BioCity Nottingham, Pennyfoot Street, Nottingham, NG1 1GF, UK

    Timothy E Bates

  4. School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    Dumitru Constantin-Teodosiu

Authors
  1. Mark M Aloysius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abed M Zaitoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Timothy E Bates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohammad Ilyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dumitru Constantin-Teodosiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Brian J Rowlands
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dileep N Lobo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dileep N Lobo.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MMA was involved with the design of the study, acquisition of data, data analysis and drafting of the manuscript. AMZ was involved with the design of the study, acquisition and interpretation of the data, and critical review of the manuscript. TEB, MI, DC-T and BJR were involved with the design of the study, interpretation of the data, and critical review of the manuscript. DNL was involved with the design of the study, interpretation of the data, critical review of the manuscript and overall supervision of the work. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aloysius, M.M., Zaitoun, A.M., Bates, T.E. et al. Immunohistochemical expression of mitochondrial membrane complexes (MMCs) I, III, IV and V in malignant and benign periampullary epithelium: a potential target for drug therapy of periampullary cancer?. BMC Cancer 10, 80 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-80

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chronic Pancreatitis
  • Cholangiocarcinoma
  • Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
  • Pancreatic Resection
  • Benign Tissue

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us