Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Breast and other cancer dormancy as a therapeutic endpoint: speculative recombinant T cell receptor ligand (RTL) adjuvant therapy worth considering?

BMC Cancer201010:251

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-251

Received: 15 December 2009

Accepted: 2 June 2010

Published: 2 June 2010

Abstract

Background

Most individuals who died of trauma were found to harbour microscopic primary cancers at autopsies. Surgical excision of the primary tumour, unfortunately, seems to disturb tumour dormancy in over half of all metastatic relapses.

Presentation of the hypothesis

A recently developed immune model suggested that the evolutionary pressure driving the creation of a T cell receptor repertoire was primarily the homeostatic surveillance of the genome. The model is based on the homeostatic role of T cells, suggesting that molecular complementarity between the positively selected T cell receptors and the self peptide-presenting major histocompatibility complex molecules establishes and regulates homeostasis, strictly limiting variations of its components. The repertoire is maintained by continuous peripheral stimulation via soluble forms of self-peptide-presenting major histocompatibility complex molecules governed by the law of mass action. The model states that foreign peptides inhibit the complementary interactions between the major histocompatibility complexes and T cell receptors. Since the vast majority of clinically detected cancers present self-peptides the model assumes that tumour cells are, paradoxically, under homeostatic T cell control.

The novelty of our hypothesis therefore is that resection of the primary tumour mass is perceived as loss of 'normal' tissue cells. Consequently, T cells striving to reconstitute homeostasis stimulate rather than inhibit the growth of dormant tumour cells and avascular micrometastases. Here we suggest that such kick-start growths could be prevented by a recombinant T cell receptor ligand therapy that modifies T cell behaviour through a partial activation mechanism.

Testing the hypothesis

The homeostatic T cell regulation of tumours can be tested in a tri-transgenic mice model engineered to express potent oncogenes in a doxycycline-dependent manner. We suggest seeding dissociated, untransformed mammary cells from doxycycline naïve mice into the lungs of two mice groups: one carries mammary tumours, the other does not. Both recipient groups to be fed doxycycline in order to activate the oncogenes of the untransformed mammary cells in the lungs, where solitary nodules are expected to develop 6 weeks after injection. We expect that lung metastasis development will be stimulated following resection of the primary tumour mass compared to the tumour-free mice. A recombinant T cell receptor ligand therapy, starting at least one day before resection and continuing during the entire experimental period, would be able to prevent the stimulating effect of surgery.

Implications of the hypothesis

Recombinant T cell receptor ligand therapy of diagnosed cancer would keep all metastatic deposits microscopic for as long as the therapy is continued without limit and could be pursued as one method of cancer control. Improving the outcome of therapy by preventing the development of metastases is perhaps achievable more readily than curing patients with overt metastases.

Background

Two out of three humans never develop cancer [1]. Nevertheless, most individuals, with no apparent pathology, but who died of trauma, were found to harbour microscopic primary cancers revealed at autopsies [2]. This phenomenon is related to the so-called tumour dormancy, a reference to latent cancer cells. It has been defined as 'the disease free period' between clinical 'cure' of the primary cancer and its subsequent local or distant recurrence/metastasis. Tumour dormancy is a reversible process [3].

Breast cancer, for example, may recur as long as 50 years after surgery [4]. One third of patients, 7 to 22 years after mastectomy and without any evidence of disease, had circulating tumour cells (CTCs). Since the half-life of these CTCs is probably 1 to 3 hours, a precise balance between replication of tumour cells and cell death seems very likely. It has been suggested that the dying CTCs require getting replenished every few hours by replicating tumour cells somewhere in the tissues [5]. Presumably, in a major population of clinically cured patients, 'dormant' breast cancer may be thought of as a chronic disease, which is kept in check by the patients' own physiological mechanisms [6].

Such findings may be explained by the so-called tumour homeostasis paradigm [7], which considers tumours as an organ-like structure assuming a dynamic and reciprocal relationship between genetically damaged cells and their microenvironment. The original seed and soil hypothesis [8] was refined recognizing that metastases of solid tumours require collaborative interactions between malignant cells and a diverse assortment of "activated" stromal cells at both primary and secondary tumour locations [9].

In the above context, century old observations that surgery of malignant tumours may be the reason for enhancement of growth of metastases with fatal outcome perhaps make sense [7, 1012]. In fact, such experiences often prevented surgeons from touching the tumour if it was not absolutely necessary. Particularly, data in fourteen separate databases from different countries indicated the existence of two peaks in relapse frequency for distal plus local relapses among early stage breast cancer patients, who were untreated with adjuvant therapy (see for references in [12]). As suggested earlier [13], this complex relapse pattern cannot be explained simply by unrestrained continuous cellular growth. Rather the dominant mode of relapse in early-stage breast cancer could be the iatrogenic interference with and most unfortunately terminating dormancy at the time of surgery, precipitating accelerated relapses [14]. In fact, over half of all metastatic relapses seem to be induced by such iatrogenic events [12]. Paradoxically, it has also been shown that a primary tumour may inhibit the growth of metastases in the liver [15].

Compounding the above problem that despite complete resection of the tumour with tumour free margins in all patients, during the following 3 to 4 days, in 85% of treated patients epithelial cells started increasing up to a thousand fold. After resection of tumours, even if they are small and resection is complete, cells can remain in the circulation over long periods of time [16].

Since dormant tumour cells are highly refractory to chemotherapy, leading to uncertainty in the prognosis for patients already treated for primary cancer, a NIH workshop envisioned tumour dormancy as a therapeutic endpoint [17]. Such an objective however requires chronic therapy.

Importantly, the surgical reactivation of metastasis is just one of many other possible theories explaining surgery-induced immune suppression, which increases with larger incisions [18]. In fact, concerns of tumour dissemination related to tumour manipulation led to the explosion of the minimally invasive surgery in the 1990s. Almost every procedure traditionally performed via laparotomy has been performed successfully by laparoscopic methods, including pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer [19].

Presentation of the hypothesis

If the majority of humans harbour microscopic cancer and the switch of these tumours to the angiogenic phenotype is so infrequent, then this "Achilles' heel" of cancer progression could be exploited to prevent the growth of many harmless early lesions to the few lethal tumours, currently detectable and treatable [20]. In fact, recently in this journal, Retsky et al. [21] suggested such a therapy for early stage breast cancer. To prevent micrometastatic angiogenesis resulting from surgery or at any time later, they suggest employing the primary antiangiogenic Endostatin starting at least one day before surgery and continuing indefinitely since no acquired resistance develops.

Persistent pro-tumour immune responses (inflammation), now generally accepted as potentiating primary tumour development, are being recognized as mediators of cancer metastasis [22]. Therefore, inhibition of metastases at secondary sites by fostering maintenance of immune and tissue homeostasis offers promising approach for cancer therapy when dormant malignant disease might be suspected to occur. In order to prevent the kick-start growth of micrometastases by surgical resection of the primary tumour, we propose a predictably feasible new 'physiological' therapy approach, which is based on the homeostatic role of T cells model [23]. We believe that crucially the virtue of our hypothesis is that the evolutionary pressure driving the creation of a T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire was primarily the homeostatic surveillance of the genome. The TCR repertoire appears to provide a complementary image of the host proteins expressed such that it facilitates the formation of a homeostatic coupled system that restricts variation of T cells and host cells. The TCR repertoire is maintained by continuous peripheral stimulation via soluble forms of self-peptide-presenting major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules governed by the law of mass action [24] [see Fig. 1, Fig.2 and video clip in additional file 1 and also in [23, 25].
Figure 1

Strong medicine. The human T cell, a multitasking agent in the immune system, is normally activated only when two receptors are stimulated (left). But the "superagonist" used in a London clinical trial can activate T cells by stimulating a single receptor (right). Credit: (illustration) C. Bickel/Science. Reproduced with permission from Marshall E. Drug trials. Violent reaction to monoclonal antibody therapy remains a mystery. Science 2006;311(5768):1688-9.

Figure 2

A single frame is presented from the video clip of the Homeostatic Role of T cells model. Reproduced with permission of S. Karger AG, Basel from Bakacs T, Mehrishi JN, Szabados T, Varga L, Szabo M, Tusnady G. T Cells Survey the Stability of the Self: A Testable Hypothesis on the Homeostatic Role of TCR-MHC Interactions. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2007;144:171-82.

Additional file 1: Video clip. The body is constantly attacked by infections and defended by a collection of antibodies. The infections are represented by 'lightings' that have colours: light or dark blue and silver. The antibody filter has the same colours. The circle is the body containing a tube, which is the lymphoid vessel. The tissue cells (coloured red, yellow, white, brown and purple) are in the central upper part. T cells are located in the lymph node at the edge of the lymphoid vessel. A large APC is located in the lower part. Tissue cell-derived peptides determine TCR specificity. Colours of T cells designate the self pMHCs, which rescued them during positive selection. Complementary self pMHCs and TCRs have identical colours. For the sake of simplicity, in the animation the many different self pMHCs in a single cell are neglected. One T cell recognizes only one self pMHC. The animation shows how the whole system is capable of determining whether a given pMHC is self or non-self. An individual T cell is unable to make such a decision. Together, however, they can because there is a complementary TCR for every self pMHC in the immune system that recognizes an individual peptide fragment. The self pMHCs are presented, one by one, as they flow via the lymph into the lymph node. Eventually, all soluble self pMHCs are captured by complementary TCRs. In this way all tissue cells remain intact. Finally, a viral infection, designated by green colour, enters the body and infects a cell changing its self peptide into a foreign peptide (fpMHC). The soluble f pMHC molecule (the danger signal in the Homeostatic Role of T cells model) freely crosses the lymphoid tissue because no complementary TCR is present. Eventually, fpMHC is captured by an APC, which initiates 2 independent processes. Firstly, the APC activates cytotoxic T cells to locate and eliminate the infection. The T cells travel via the blood vessel into the tissues. In the meantime the virus infects other cells in the body and is also released to the environment represented by small green dots. Secondly, the APC initiates hypermutation in B cells represented by coloured dots at the lower right part of the screen. Eventually, the green colour will appear as a new B cell clone and also become part of the extended immune defence filter. (AVI 357 KB)

The homeostatic T cell model states that only foreign peptides inhibit the complementary TCR-MHC interactions. Since the vast majority of clinically detected cancers present self-peptides - because they lack tumour associated antigens - the homeostatic T cell model assumes that tumour cells are, paradoxically, controlled by homeostatic T cells. The novelty of our hypothesis therefore is that resection of the primary tumour mass is perceived as loss of 'normal' tissue cells. Consequently, T cells striving to reconstitute homeostasis stimulate rather than inhibit the growth of dormant tumour cells and avascular micrometastases. An example that may enlighten our hypothesis is liver resection for metastatic (colorectal carcinoma) tumours, often followed by a significant incidence of tumour recurrence. This might indicate that factors involved in liver regeneration may also stimulate the growth of 'sleeping' tumours and the reactivation of dormant micrometastases [26].

We suggest therefore that such homeostatic T cell stimulation could be prevented by a recombinant TCR ligand ("RTL"), which is composed of a naturally processed peptide product from normal mammary cells covalently ligated to a major histocompatibility complex class I molecule. Appropriate normal (non-tumour-type-specific) peptides may be identified by genomic and proteomic methodologies using cell-displayed peptide libraries carrying intrinsic fluorescent marker allowing for sorting and characterization with quantitative flow cytometry [27].

RTLs - the peptide binding/T cell recognition domains of MHC class II molecules - have emerged as a new class of therapeutic agents with potent clinical efficacy in a diverse set of animal models for multiple sclerosis [28]. The RTL molecule consists of the peptide-binding beta1alpha1 domain of MHC class II covalently ligated to a peptide separating it from the alpha2beta2 domain that may provide additional signalling through CD4 or other cell surface molecules. RTL can bind directly to the TCR and present native antigenic peptides in the context of MHC - i.e. an optimal signal 1 - without costimulation from antigen presenting cells (APCs). This way, RTL modifies T cell behaviour through a partial activation mechanism that accounts for the inhibitory effects of RTL on encephalitogenic CD4+ T cells. Here we suggest that an RTL therapy would be able to inhibit the homeostatic T cell stimulation of disseminated tumour cells (after resection of the primary tumour) through a partial activation mechanism. It would prolong the natural tendency for dormancy in the early stages of the disease, keep all metastatic deposits microscopic for as long as the therapy would continue without limit and could be pursued as one method of cancer control. Breast cancer is the most obvious target, but this idea could be applied to other cancers as well.

Clearly, an RTL therapy cannot substitute the antigen specific immunotherapeutic strategies aimed at activating the immune system to recognize and destroy tumour cells (e.g. cancer vaccine to stimulate p53-specific T cells using autologous dendritic cells pulsed with various HLA-A*0201 binding wild-type p53 derived peptides used in HLA-A2+ patients with progressive late-stage metastatic breast cancer [29]). Rather the two approaches would probably complement each other. A good place to start such combined efforts is melanoma, which has long been recognized to be immunogenic; furthermore, the clinical facts confirm the metastatic dormancy of melanoma. Definitive proof is available that the immunogenic character of this cancer is associated with dormancy. Melanoma cells persisted in a dormant state in the kidney of a donor for 16 years and upon transplantation to two different but immune-suppressed hosts, they emerged from dormancy [30]. In fact, clinical and experimental data on melanoma indicate that some aspects of melanoma biology imitate traits recently associated with dormancy in other solid cancers [31]. Cutaneous and uveal melanoma, in spite of being of the same origin, differs profoundly in their clinical progression. Between 40 and 50% of uveal melanoma remain undetected for longer than a decade, while less than 5% of cutaneous melanoma show this behaviour. This difference may also have immunologic origin. The eye, the site of uveal melanoma, is rich in immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory factors, which dampen both innate and adaptive immune responses [31].

Testing the hypothesis

The protective effect of RTL therapy on the iatrogenic effect of primary tumour resection could be tested in a tri-transgenic mouse model engineered to express potent oncogenes in a doxycycline-dependent mammary-specific manner [32]. Such animals develop diffuse autochthonous tumours only after doxycycline exposure within 3 to 4 weeks. Podsypanina et al. [33] demonstrated that in the absence of oncogene activation untransformed mammary cells are capable of travelling to and surviving in the lungs for up to 16 weeks, grow slowly and remain clinically undetectable. Such cells, however, may assume malignant growth upon oncogene activation.

We suggest therefore seeding of dissociated primary mammary cells from doxycycline naïve mice, via the lateral tail veins, in the lungs of two groups of mice: the first group unexposed to doxycycline and the second one with primary mammary tumours developed following doxycycline exposure. Now both recipient mice groups are administered doxycycline to activate the oncogenes of the untransformed mammary cells in the lungs, where solitary nodules are expected to develop 6 weeks after injection [33]. At the start of this feeding animals in both the groups would undergo a sham resection in the first group and resection of the primary tumour in the second group. Based on the prediction of the homeostatic T cell model we would expect that lung metastasis development will be faster in animals from which the primary tumour mass had been removed.

We envisage that an RTL therapy, starting at least one day before surgery and continuing during the entire experimental period, would be able to prevent the growth stimulating effect of surgery.

Implications of the hypothesis

Jørgensen and Gøtzsche [34] recently reported 52% overdiagnosis of breast cancer in a population offered organised mammography screening - that is, one in three breast cancers is over diagnosed. Others [3537] judged that screening for cancer, while beneficial, might lead to over diagnoses and over treatment, thus perhaps it is best to leave it alone. Sadly, this would mean that 'one in 400 women not screened for any potential treatment for tumour remaining undiagnosed will die within the next 10 years' [38].

Leaving the choice to patients rather than to highly experienced professionals in a matter of almost 'life and death', would place an intolerable burden on those already distressed and looking for sound decisions. Using adjuvant RTL therapy, however, one may not have to choose between the evils of undiscovered primary tumours in unscreened patients and induction of metastases in treated ones - like Odysseus having to choose between two life-threatening evils, Scylla and Charybdis, but managing to avoid both.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor John Trowsdale, Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK for valuable comments.

Note added in proof: Since submission of the revised manuscript supporting ideas were expressed in Science and J Med Screen respectively:

"Understanding the extent to which tumor-induced lymphoid tissue-like structures are plastic will go a long way toward determining if blocking CCL21 and/or LTi cell function can disrupt immune tolerance of the tumor-induced structures, thereby releasing host immunity to aid in eliminating the malignant cells." (Zindl CL, Chaplin DD. Immunology: Tumor immune evasion. Science 2010 May 7;328(5979):697-8).

Whereas, Zindl and Chaplin refer to this phenomenon as "immune tolerance of tumors", we suggested that such a cross-talk between tumours and lymphoid tissues is a physiological homeostasis in the majority of tumours, which however can be influenced by recombinant T cell receptor ligand therapy to the benefit of patients (even if malignant cells cannot be eliminated).

"The benefit of mammographic screening in terms of lives saved is greater in absolute terms than the harm in terms of overdiagnosis. Between 2 and 2.5 lives are saved for every overdiagnosed case." (Duffy SW, Tabar L, Olsen AH, Vitak B, Allgood PC, Chen TH et al. Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England. J Med Screen 2010;17(1):25-30).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Probability, Alfred Rényi Institute of Mathematics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
(2)
University of Cambridge
(3)
The Cambridge Blood Cell, Stem Cells, Spermatozoa and Opioid Research Initiatives

References

  1. Klein G: Toward a genetics of cancer resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 859-863. 10.1073/pnas.0811616106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Black WC, Welch HG: Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy. N Engl J Med. 1993, 328: 1237-1243. 10.1056/NEJM199304293281706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguirre-Ghiso JA: Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007, 7: 834-846. 10.1038/nrc2256.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Meltzer A: Dormancy and breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1990, 43: 181-188. 10.1002/jso.2930430312.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Meng S, Tripathy D, Frenkel EP, Shete S, Naftalis EZ, Huth JF, Beitsch PD, Leitch M, Hoover S, Euhus D, Haley B, Morrison L, Fleming TP, Herlyn D, Terstappen LW, Fehm T, Tucker TF, Lane N, Wang J, Uhr JW: Circulating tumor cells in patients with breast cancer dormancy. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 8152-8162. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Marches R, Scheuermann R, Uhr J: Cancer dormancy: from mice to man. Cell Cycle. 2006, 5: 1772-1778. 10.4161/cc.5.16.2995.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Demicheli R, Retsky MW, Hrushesky WJ, Baum M, Gukas ID: The effects of surgery on tumor growth: a century of investigations. Ann Oncol. 2008Google Scholar
  8. Paget S: The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. Lancet. 1889, 1: 571-573. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)49915-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. DeNardo DG, Johansson M, Coussens LM: Immune cells as mediators of solid tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008, 27: 11-18. 10.1007/s10555-007-9100-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Demicheli R, Terenziani M, Valagussa P, Moliterni A, Zambetti M, Bonadonna G: Local recurrences following mastectomy: support for the concept of tumor dormancy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994, 86: 45-48. 10.1093/jnci/86.1.45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Demicheli R, Miceli R, Moliterni A, Zambetti M, Hrushesky WJ, Retsky MW, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G: Local recurrences following mastectomy: support for the concept of tumor dormancy. Ann Oncol. 2005, 16: 1449-1457. 10.1093/annonc/mdi280.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Retsky MW, Demicheli R, Hrushesky WJ, Baum M, Gukas ID: Dormancy and surgery-driven escape from dormancy help explain some clinical features of breast cancer. APMIS. 2008, 116: 730-741. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2008.00990.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Norton L: A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth. Cancer Res. 1988, 48: 7067-7071.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Retsky M, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W: Premenopausal status accelerates relapse in node positive breast cancer: hypothesis links angiogenesis, screening controversy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001, 65: 217-224. 10.1023/A:1010626302152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Peeters CF, de Waal RM, Wobbes T, Westphal JR, Ruers TJ: Outgrowth of human liver metastases after resection of the primary colorectal tumor: a shift in the balance between apoptosis and proliferation. Int J Cancer. 2006, 119: 1249-1253. 10.1002/ijc.21928.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Camara O, Kavallaris A, Noschel H, Rengsberger M, Jorke C, Pachmann K: Seeding of epithelial cells into circulation during surgery for breast cancer: the fate of malignant and benign mobilized cells. World J Surg Oncol. 2006, 4: 67-10.1186/1477-7819-4-67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Vessella RL, Pantel K, Mohla S: Tumor cell dormancy: an NCI workshop report. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007, 6: 1496-1504. 10.4161/cbt.6.9.4828.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nelson CJ, Lysle DT: Severity, time, and beta-adrenergic receptor involvement in surgery-induced immune alterations. J Surg Res. 1998, 80: 115-122. 10.1006/jsre.1998.5429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kooby DA: Laparoscopic surgery for cancer: historical, theoretical, and technical considerations. Oncology (Williston Park). 2006, 20: 917-927.Google Scholar
  20. Folkman J, Kalluri R: Cancer without disease. Nature. 2004, 427: 787-10.1038/427787a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Retsky MW, Hrushesky WJ, Gukas ID: Hypothesis: primary antiangiogenic method proposed to treat early stage breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 7-10.1186/1471-2407-9-7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC: Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 563-572. 10.1038/nrc865.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bakacs T, Mehrishi JN, Szabados T, Varga L, Szabo M, Tusnady G: T Cells Survey the Stability of the Self: A Testable Hypothesis on the Homeostatic Role of TCR-MHC Interactions. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2007, 144: 171-182. 10.1159/000103282.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sykulev Y, Cohen RJ, Eisen HN: The law of mass action governs antigen-stimulated cytolytic activity of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 11990-11992. 10.1073/pnas.92.26.11990.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Mehrishi JN, Szabo M, Bakacs T: Some aspects of the recombinantly expressed humanised superagonist anti-CD28 mAb, TGN1412 trial catastrophe lessons to safeguard mAbs and vaccine trials. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 3517-3523. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.078.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Christophi C, Harun N, Fifis T: Liver regeneration and tumor stimulation-- a review of cytokine and angiogenic factors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008, 12: 966-980. 10.1007/s11605-007-0459-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dane KY, Gottstein C, Daugherty PS: Cell surface profiling with peptide libraries yields ligand arrays that classify breast tumor subtypes. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009,Google Scholar
  28. Burrows GG: Systemic immunomodulation of autoimmune disease using MHC-derived recombinant TCR ligands. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2005, 4: 185-193. 10.2174/1568010053586363.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Svane IM, Pedersen AE, Nikolajsen K, Zocca MB: Alterations in p53-specific T cells and other lymphocyte subsets in breast cancer patients during vaccination with p53-peptide loaded dendritic cells and low-dose interleukin-2. Vaccine. 2008, 26: 4716-4724. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.085.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Penn I: Malignant melanoma in organ allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1996, 61: 274-278. 10.1097/00007890-199601270-00019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ossowski L, Aguirre-Ghiso JA: Dormancy of metastatic melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2010, 23: 41-56. 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2009.00647.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gunther EJ, Belka GK, Wertheim GB, Wang J, Hartman JL, Boxer RB, Chodosh LA: A novel doxycycline-inducible system for the transgenic analysis of mammary gland biology. FASEB J. 2002, 16: 283-292. 10.1096/fj.01-0551com.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Podsypanina K, Du YC, Jechlinger M, Beverly LJ, Hambardzumyan D, Varmus H: Seeding and propagation of untransformed mouse mammary cells in the lung. Science. 2008, 321: 1841-1844. 10.1126/science.1161621.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC: Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. BMJ. 2009, 339: b2587-10.1136/bmj.b2587.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Moss S: Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: overdiagnosis in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7: 230-234. 10.1186/bcr1314.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Day NE: Overdiagnosis and breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7: 228-229. 10.1186/bcr1321.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, van der Cruijsen IW, Damhuis RA, Schroder FH, de Koning HJ: Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003, 95: 868-878. 10.1093/jnci/95.12.868.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Beral V, et al: Screening for Breast Cancer in England: Past and Future. 2006, Sheffield: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, 61Google Scholar
  39. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/251/prepub

Copyright

© Bakács and Mehrishi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.