Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John Stehle |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ines Gütgemann |
16 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth A. Repasky |
3 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Stehle |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth A. Repasky |
17 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ines Gütgemann |
19 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Stehle |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Stehle |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
28 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Stehle |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
28 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
3 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
3 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-179 |
You can find further information about peer review here.