Skip to main content

Table 2 The performance comparison of different models in internal- and external- test set

From: Deep learning-assisted diagnosis of benign and malignant parotid tumors based on ultrasound: a retrospective study

Model

 

AUC (95% CI)

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

F1

Kappa

Resnet 18

Internal-test

0.947(0.915,0.979)

0.885(0.840, 0.930)

0.782(0.673, 0.891)

0.927(0.883, 0.971)

0.811(0.706, 0.917)

0.914(0.867, 0.960)

0.796

0.717

 

External-test

0.925(0.857, 0.992)

0.898(0.821, 0.975)

0.833(0.535, 1.132)

0.906(0.827, 0.984)

0.500(0.190, 0.810)

0.980(0.940, 1.019)

0.625

0.570

Resnet 50

Internal-test

0.908(0.867,0.979)

0.797(0.740, 0.854)

0.491(0.359, 0.623)

0.920(0.874, 0.965)

0.711(0.566, 0.855)

0.818(0.757, 0.879)

0.581

0.452

 

External-test

0.896(0.818, 0.974)

0.864(0.777, 0.952)

0.833(0.535, 1.132)

0.868(0.777, 0.959)

0.417(0.138, 0.696)

0.979(0.937, 1.020)

0.556

0.486

Vgg 11

Internal-test

0.902(0.860,0.944)

0.839(0.786, 0.891)

0.691(0.569, 0.813)

0.898(0.847, 0.949)

0.731(0.610, 0.851)

0.879(0.824, 0.933)

0.710

0.598

 

External-test

0.887(0.806, 0.968)

0.847(0.756, 0.939)

0.833(0.535, 1.132)

0.849(0.753, 0.945)

0.385(0.120, 0.649)

0.978(0.936, 1.020)

0.526

0.450

Vgg 16

Internal-test

0.907(0.866,0.948)

0.839(0.786, 0.891)

0.764(0.651, 0.876)

0.869(0.812, 0.925)

0.700(0.584, 0.816)

0.902(0.851, 0.952)

0.730

0.616

 

External-test

0.887(0.806, 0.968)

0.814(0.714, 0.913)

0.833(0.535, 1.132)

0.811(0.706, 0.917)

0.333(0.095, 0.572)

0.977(0.933, 1.021)

0.476

0.387

Mobilenetv2

Internal-test

0.878(0.832,0.925)

0.839(0.786, 0.891)

0.709(0.589, 0.829)

0.891(0.838, 0.943)

0.722(0.603, 0.842)

0.884(0.831, 0.937)

0.716

0.603

 

External-test

0.858(0.770, 0.947)

0.797(0.694, 0.899)

0.667(0.289, 1.044)

0.811(0.706, 0.917)

0.286(0.049, 0.522)

0.956(0.895, 1.016)

0.400

0.300

  1. AUC area under the curve, PPV positive prediction value, NPV negative prediction value