Skip to main content

Table 3 Acceptable travel time to healthcare institutions under different travel modes

From: Is low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening conveniently accessible in China? A spatial analysis based on cross-sectional survey

Type of healthcare institutions

Travel mode

Travel Time (min)

Classification

Number (%)

Classification

Number (%)

0–15

15–30

30–60

> 60

Healthcare institutions above provincial-level

869

(34.36%)

Walking

69(7.94%)

40(57.97%)

25(36.23%)

4(5.80%)

0(0.00%)

Bicycle/Electric vehicle

45(5.18%)

14(31.11%)

23(51.11%)

7(15.56%)

1(2.22%)

Driving/Public transportation

755(86.88%)

39(5.17%)

214(28.34%)

264(34.97%)

238(31.52%)

Municipal-level healthcare institutions

1419

(56.11%)

Walking

286(20.16%)

124(43.36%)

117(40.91%)

42(14.69%)

3(1.05%)

Bicycle/Electric vehicle

151(10.64%)

54(35.76%)

87(57.62%)

9(5.96%)

1(0.66%)

Driving/Public transportation

982(69.20%)

201(20.47%)

495(50.41%)

213(21.69%)

73(7.43%)

County-level healthcare institutions

203

(8.03%)

Walking

74(36.45%)

23(31.08%)

45(60.81%)

5(6.76%)

1(1.35%)

Bicycle/Electric vehicle

41(20.20%)

16(39.02%)

21(51.22%)

3(7.32%)

1(2.44%)

Driving/Public transportation

88(43.35%)

17(19.32%)

36(40.91%)

22(25.00%)

13(14.77%)

Other healthcare institutions

38

(1.50%)

Walking

15(39.47%)

12(80.00%)

3(20.00%)

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

Bicycle/Electric vehicle

7(18.42%)

2(28.57%)

4(57.14%)

1(14.29%)

0(0.00%)

Driving/Public transportation

16(42.11%)

3(18.75%)

6(37.50%)

5(31.25%)

2(12.50%)