Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance evaluation of different CNN models on test images

From: Convolutional neural network-based magnetic resonance image differentiation of filum terminale ependymomas from schwannomas

Input

Model

Sensitivity

Specificity

Accuracy

AUC

Kappa

T1-WI

Resnet-50

55.9%

76.9%

66.9%

0.714

0.331

T2-WI

Resnet-50

40.0%

78.8%

60.9%

0.649

0.193

CE-T1

Resnet-50

74.2%

80.9%

77.6%

0.855

0.552

T1-WI

Efficientnet-b2

86.4%

69.2%

77.4%

0.854

0.552

T2-WI

Efficientnet-b2

72.9%

72.7%

72.8%

0.769

0.455

CE-T1

Efficientnet-b2

81.8%

76.5%

79.1%

0.890

0.582

T1-WI

Inception-v3

76.3%

76.9%

76.6%

0.844

0.532

T2-WI

Inception-v3

74.1%

82.5%

78.6%

0.874

0.568

CE-T1

Inception-v3

83.3%

75.0%

79.1%

0.871

0.583