Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of PR on respiratory responses to exercise

From: Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and cardiopulmonary function in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

 

Pre-PR

Post-PR

Mean difference

p

FEV1/FVC (%)

81.0 ± 8.6

84.6 ± 27.1

3.6 ± 25.9

0.304

FEV1 (L/min)

1.9 ± 0.4

2.0 ± 0.9

0.1 ± 0.8

0.333

FEV1 (%) (predicted)

84.8 ± 18.3

85.5 ± 19.7

0.8 ± 11.7

0.619

FVC (L)

2.4 ± 0.5

2.4 ± 0.6

0.0 ± 0.4

0.866

FVC (%) (predicted)

84.6 ± 16.7

84.8 ± 19.1

0.2 ± 11.6

0.872

MIP (cmH2O)

69.5 ± 24.3

75.1 ± 24.2

5.6 ± 17.4

0.019

MEP (cmH2O)

111.3 ± 32.4

110.8 ± 25.8

 − 0.4 ± 20.4

0.870

VT (mL) (at rest)

503.2 ± 156.0

487.4 ± 145.0

 − 15.8 ± 139.0

0.399

VT (mL) (during exercise)

1,129.8 ± 277.2

1,211.3 ± 357.4

81.5 ± 265.9

0.026

RF (breaths/min) (at rest)

19.0 ± 5.3

18.5 ± 5.0

 − 0.5 ± 5.2

0.489

RF (breaths/min) (during exercise)

35.8 ± 8.4

35.1 ± 7.5

 − 0.7 ± 7.3

0.490

SpO2 (%) (at rest)

96.6 ± 1.7

97.0 ± 0.9

0.4 ± 1.5

0.057

SpO2 (%) (during exercise)

95.8 ± 3.0

95.8 ± 2.4

0.0 ± 1.7

0.874

VEQ

36.5 ± 5.1

35.1 ± 4.6

 − 1.3 ± 4.9

0.048

  1. p = comparison between pre- and post-PR
  2. Abbreviations: FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC Forced vital capacity, MEP Maximal expiratory pressure, MIP Maximal inspiratory pressure, PR Pulmonary rehabilitation, RF Respiratory frequency, SpO2 Arterial oxygen saturation, VEQ Ventilatory equivalent, VT Tidal volume