Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of the low AIMMV group

From: Automated evaluation of masseter muscle volume: deep learning prognostic approach in oral cancer

Variables

 

Univariate analysis

 

Multivariate analysis

 

(Fisher’s exact test)

(Cox proportional hazards model)

Cutoff

HR

p-value

HR

p-value

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

Age

77

2.018

0.068

  

(0.919–4.268)

  

Sex

Male or female

0.927

0.871

  

(0.468–1.857)

  

Stage

I and II or III and IV

10.875

< 0.001

6.267

< 0.001

(4.714–28.304)

(2.785–14.100)

CRP (mg/dL)

1.15

3.259

0.021

0.733

0.615

(1.044–9.314)

(0.219–2.454)

Alb (g/dL)

4.3

2.090

0.035

0.704

0.374

(1.041–4.329)

(0.325–1.525)

A/G ratio

1.58

3.015

0.004

1.258

0.621

(1.315–7.802)

(0.507–3.122)

T-cho (mg/dL)

143

1.504

0.510

  

(0.349–4.984)

  

mGPS

2

12.55

0.005

2.942

0.169

(1.736–143.109)

(0.632–13.710)

CONUT

2

4.682

< 0.001

2.093

0.040

(2.143–10.115)

(1.035–4.229)

CAR

0.033

2.703

0.065

  

(0.920–10.839)

  

NLR

2.398

2.676

0.003

0.995

0.988

(1.337–5.496)

(0.485–2.039)

PLR

189.507

1.493

0.263

  

(0.688–3.114)

  

PNI

53.888

3.428

0.005

1.619

0.405

(1.371–10.281)

(0.521–5.028)

BMI (kg/m2)

20.233

3.375

< 0.001

2.044

0.023

(1.680–6.959)

(1.102–3.793)

AIMMV (cm3)

Male, 45.030

 

< 0.001

 

0.036

4.346

2.231

Female, 31.752

(2.042–9.946)

(1.055–4.719)

  1. Low AIMMV was an independent poor prognostic factor, along with stage, CONUT score, and BMI (HR, 2.231; 95% CI, 1.055–4.719; p = 0.036)