Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of Rechallenge Treatment

From: Comparing the efficacy of regorafenib and 5-fluorouracil-based rechallenge chemotherapy in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

 

Rechallenge (n = 128)

Chemotherapy, n (%)

 Oxaliplatin based treatment (FOLFOX/XELOX)

60 (46.8)

 Irinotecan based treatment (FOLFIRI/XELIRI)

39 (30.4)

 Irinotecan and oxaliplatin based treatment (FOLFIRINOX)

23 (17.9)

 Othersa

6 (4.6)

Rechallenge chemotherapy regimen (n = 128)

 Same as first-line, n (%)

71 (55.5)

 Same as second-line, n (%)

29 (22.6)

 Both oxaliplatin and irinotecan in rechallenge, n (%)

22 (17.2)

 Only FU-based, n (%)

6 (4.7)

Biological agent combined with chemotherapy, n(%)

 Anti-VEGF

76 (59.3)

 Anti-EGFR

30 (23.4)

 None

22 (17.2)

Prior exposure of the biological agent used in rechallenge, (n = 106, %)

 Yes

73 (68.9)

 No

33 (31.1)

 Anti-VEGF in third-line

10 (30)

 Anti-EGFR (cetuximab/panitumumab) in third-line

23 (70)

Prior response to chemotherapy used in rechallenge, n(%)

 CR + PR + SD

112 (70.8)

 PD

16 (29.1)

  1. XELOX capecitabine and oxaliplatin, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD disease progression, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, EGFR endothelial growth factor receptor
  2. aOthers include capecitabine monotherapy, 5-FU/Leucovorin infusion